NCR on Kindle - NCR classifieds - YouTube - Twitter - Facebook - Email Alerts - RSS
Of all people, Cardinal Kasper?
LONDON -- In the abstract, if you were to pick the Vatican personality least likely to cause a diplomatic and media row on the eve of a papal trip, it would probably be Cardinal Walter Kasper, who recently retired after a decade as the pope’s top official for ecumenism and relations with Jews.
Time and again in recent years, Kasper, now 77, was the Vatican’s go-to guy to soothe hurt feelings and to smooth over a crisis. So entrenched was that reputation that some wags actually dubbed him "Kasper the Friendly Cardinal."
When the Vatican document Dominus Iesus caused a firestorm a decade ago by asserting that non-Christians are in an “objectively deficient situation,” it was Kasper who assured the world that the church’s commitment to inter-faith harmony was intact. Last year, when the lifting of the excommunication of a Holocaust-denying bishop threatened to derail Catholic-Jewish relations, it was Kasper who worked the phones to reassure Jewish leaders that the church’s commitment to fighting anti-Semitism endures.
Most recently, when the preacher of the papal household compared criticism of Pope Benedict to anti-Semitism during a Good Friday service in Rome, Kasper once again stepped into the breach.
At least in terms of public image, Kasper has sometime seemed a kinder, gentler version of Joseph Ratzinger, the man who is now Pope Benedict XVI. Both are accomplished German theologians, both profoundly committed to the church’s teaching and mission. Yet where Ratzinger has been a sometimes polarizing figure for his outspoken defense of Catholic orthodoxy, Kasper was always the diplomat, finding ways to express the same ideas in language that defused tense situations.
One imagines that Benedict XVI must therefore be astonished to find that it was Kasper, of all people, who threatened to overshadow the opening act of the pope’s Sept. 16-19 trip to the United Kingdom with some ill-chosen and explosive language.
In an interview with a German magazine this week, the cardinal said that “When you arrive at Heathrow you think at times that you’ve landed in a Third World country.” That line received huge play today in the British press and was widely taken as a slight. (My proof is that a cab driver on the way in from Heathrow today, upon learning that I was here to cover the pope, asked me: “Third world country? Who does that bloke think he is?”)
Kasper’s secretary, Monsignor Oliver Lahl, has told media outlets that the cardinal doesn’t intend to apologize, because he only meant to say that the U.K. is an increasingly multi-cultural society.
“He was simply saying that Britain is no longer a mono-cultural country,” Lahl told reporters. “There was nothing racist or xenophobic in that. He can’t understand why this has become such a big issue in the past. He is in bed so he can’t check the internet to look at the coverage, but he has been informed.”
Kasper, who was originally set to be part of the delegation accompanying Pope Benedict to the U.K., dropped out due to illness before the contretemps over his comments erupted.
Fr. Federico Lombardi, the Vatican spokesperson, also applied a bit of gloss on Kasper’s behalf. The cardinal was referring to "a cosmopolitan reality,” Lombardi said, “a melting pot of ordinary humanity and all of its diversity and its problems.”
To be clear, anyone who knows Kasper realizes he didn’t intend to give offense. He’s an admirer of English literature and culture, and has a special fondness for the Anglican Communion (another constituency with whom Kasper has long played the role of papal trouble-shooter.)
Yet the toxic fallout from his interview can be glimpsed from the reaction of Scottish Cardinal Keith O’ Brien, who more or less called on Kasper to apologize.
“That was unfortunate, and each and every person's aides sometimes do make awkward, difficult remarks,” O'Brien told BBC Radio Scotland. “Sometimes we make awkward, difficult remarks ourselves.
“And simply, if we do that sort of thing we apologize for it, and I'm sure Cardinal Kasper will apologize for any intemperate remarks which he made some time ago,” O’Brien said.
Vatican officials, of course, sometimes seem to have a genius for saying exactly the wrong thing at exactly the wrong time. The fact that this time it was the guy whose specialty has always been solving PR problems, not creating them, might nevertheless be taken as a new low.
[John L. Allen, Jr. is NCR senior correspondent.]
John Allen will be filing reports throughout the Papal visit to the U.K. Sept. 16-19. Stay tuned to NCR Today for updates.






Try as I might, I fail to see
Try as I might, I fail to see how Cardinal Kasper's unfortunate comments merit more than two or three sentences at the most. A whole article on this? Really? And this is a MAJOR news story in the UK?
Unbelievable.
I take it that Cardinal
I take it that Cardinal Kasper really did not mean to offend, just spoke off the cuff. Sometimes some folks are just looking for an excuse to throw stones.
On the other hand he could have been sent in to fall on his sword.
I was wondering about that
I was wondering about that sword thing myself. It certainly diverted the British press.
"Vatican officials, of
"Vatican officials, of course, sometimes seem to have a genius for saying exactly the wrong thing at exactly the wrong time. The fact that this time it was the guy whose specialty has always been solving PR problems, not creating them, might nevertheless be taken as a new low."
Considering how many public lows the Catholic hierarchy has had over the last decade, that is very low indeed.
So, Kasper said something
So, Kasper said something about landing at Heathrow and the British media got its nose out of joint. And John Allen, of all people, is falling for the interpretation of these comments, offered by the British media, which for months now, consistently and in a sustained manner attacked, belittled and caricatured everything that is Catholic, Christian and/or religious. How can John Allen take so uncritically seriously the “outrage” of the British media under these circumstances? Never in my life have I seen this amount of sectarian, anti-Catholic, anti-Christian and anti-religious attitude and rhetoric in any other national media; or, as some British writers pointed out, Catholic and Pope bashing is a British national pastime, How can Jon Allen not take more seriously the context within which Kasper’s comments were made, and give more credence to what he intended to say? Or the journalistic “principle of suspicion” is only to be applied to the people the story is about and never to other journalists? Is this not bias?
Hmmm, perhaps the comment is
Hmmm, perhaps the comment is a big deal because the comment is, in fact, racist?
Hmmmm ... the comment is
Hmmmm ... the comment is racist? Only, if you believe that a third world country is inferior to Britain or the US. Kapser never said this, but obviously you think so. So, who is in fact the racist?
The papal preacher was
The papal preacher was quoting a Jewish friend who compared criticism of the pope with anti-Semitism. I thought that had been cleared up already.
Is John Allen an experienced
Is John Allen an experienced news reporter ? The Cardinal's comment has no substance and quite obviously this Cardinal bloke intended no offense to anyone. This is a new low ???? Please. God bless us all.
Well put.
Well put.
Hey, what's wrong with being
Hey, what's wrong with being a third world country? If those brits feel offended by that they are a bunch of classicist racist people.
It doesn't matter what you do
It doesn't matter what you do or say, if someone hates you, they will misinterpret everything to arrive at a negative conclusion.
It is truly wonderful to see
It is truly wonderful to see so many commenters giving Cardinal Kasper the benefit of the doubt...which he most certainly deserves. Now, if only they would do so for Pope Benedict too!
Kasper calls the land of bad
Kasper calls the land of bad teeth, warm beer and cold soup Third World?
We in the Third World must feel hurt by this insult to us . . .
especially in light of British colonial history, which created a third world to begin with . . .
Actually, photos on the
Actually, photos on the Internet of many 3rd world countries' airports seem to be more monocultural than in the 1st world...
But if the Cardinal meant that Britain is really like an Asian or African 3rd world country, where the Catholic Church is florishing, then why does the Vatican denounce it for being rampantly secular??
Can't have it both ways!!!
I repeated Kasper's line to a
I repeated Kasper's line to a couple of Brits, who both shrugged and admitted that it was true. You see so many ethnic minorities at Heathrow that it can seem that you have landed in Africa. It seems like a non-story to me.
Post new comment