NCR on Kindle - NCR classifieds - YouTube - Twitter - Facebook - Email Alerts - RSS
Pope to Muslims: 'Religion rejects all violence'
Cameroon's Christian-Muslim harmony alternative to the 'clash of civilizations'
Mar. 19, 2009
Yaoundè, Cameroon
For a sound-bite sense of the point Pope Benedict XVI wanted to make in his meeting with 22 African Muslims, think of it this way: A shorter version of Regensburg, without the poke in the eye.
Regensburg, of course, refers to the pope’s famous 2006 address at the University of Regensburg in Bavaria, in which he took up the relationship between reason and faith. Reason shorn of faith, he suggested, becomes skepticism and nihilism, which is the typical pathology of the West; faith divorced from reason, meanwhile, becomes fundamentalism and intolerance, which one sees in some currents in the Islamic world.
That carefully reasoned argument, however, was overshadowed by how the pope began. He opened the Regensburg address with a citation from a 14th century Byzantine emperor, to the effect that Muhammad, the founder of Islam, “brought things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached.” That line triggered a firestorm of protest in the Islamic world, and in some ways the Vatican has been in damage-control mode ever since.
Today saw a pope who has carefully honed his message to Muslims, distilling the essence of the 5,000-word Regensburg address into a few phrases – the heart of which was a paean to the “vast potential of human reason.”
“Genuine religion widens the horizon of human understanding and stands at the base of any authentically human culture,” the pope said. “It rejects all forms of violence and totalitarianism: not only on principles of faith, but also of right reason.”
“Indeed, religion and reason mutually reinforce one another, since religion is purified and structured by reason, and reason’s full potential is unleashed by revelation and faith,” the pontiff.
This was the essence of Regensburg: Benedict’s suggestion that Christians and Muslims have something to offer one another. Christians can contribute centuries of experience of reflecting on faith in the light of reason, leading to a spirit of tolerance; Muslims can share vibrant religiosity and insistence that empirical logic alone is not enough, thus rejuvenating a sometimes spiritually enervated West.
In other words, the point of Regensburg was to suggest that on the contemporary cultural scene, Christians and Muslims ought to be natural allies – a point that was all but lost in the polemics that followed, but which seemed much clearer this morning after the pope’s session with local Muslims as the residence of the papal ambassador in Yaoundè.
NCR: February 3-16, 2012
Subscribe to NCR to get all the news and special features that aren't always available online. In this issue:
- US News: Bishops Host Conference on Immigration
Conference fields advocates' questions on law, policy
- Special Section: Deacons. Serving as parish administrator; roles of wives; and more
- Study: Black Catholics are more engaged
New study by Notre Dame researcher about parish involvement in America
Also clear was Benedict’s preference for Christian-Muslim cooperation at the political and social level, in defense of shared values, rather than strictly theological exchange.
The pope suggested that dialogue between Christians and Muslims should “enhance mutual understanding and assist in the building up of a stable and just political order.”
In a recent preface to a book by Italian philosopher and politician Marcello Pera, the pope asserted that inter-religious dialogue, “strictly speaking, is impossible,” because it means setting aside one’s own religious identity. “Inter-cultural dialogue,” on the other hand, is “urgent and necessary,” Benedict said – by which he meant, in part, a search for common ground on how religious values can shape political and social life.
Among other things, the pope doubtless has in mind the defense of human life and the family, including opposition to abortion and homosexuality – values he shares with Muslim leaders.
During his open-air Mass in a downtown sports stadium this morning, Benedict XVI delivered a strong pro-life message.
“Every human being, every tiny human person, however weak, is created ‘in the image and likeness of God,’” the pope said. “Every person must live! Death must not prevail over life! Death will never have the last word!”
A Vatican spokesperson afterwards described the session with Muslims as “cordial and friendly,” and said the pope was grateful for the welcome from local Muslims. Cameroon, with a population of 19 million, is roughly 20 percent Muslim, 30 percent Christian, and the rest are followers of traditional African religions.
Jesuit Fr. Federico Lombardi also said that when the pope and Muslims were exchanging handshakes, several Muslims told the pontiff, “You are not alone.” (Though Lombardi said they meant it as an expression of desire for good relations, Vatican-watchers could not help but connect the remark to recent speculation in the Italian press that Benedict XVI has been isolated, even within the Vatican, by the recent controversy over a Holocaust-denying bishop. The pope’s number two official, Cardinal Tarcisio Bertone, recently took the unusual step of assuring reporters that “the pope is not alone.”)
In part, the warm atmospherics of today’s encounter can be explained by the strong tradition of Muslim-Christian harmony in Cameroon, which stands in contrast to the experience of some of its neighbors. In Nigeria, for example, violent Muslim/Christian clashes in recent years following attempts to impose shariah, meaning Islamic law,in some majority Muslim states have left hundreds dead. In Cameroon, by way of contrast, observers say the two communities live in peace. Even in the north, where Muslims often form a majority, there has been no attempt to impose shariah.
In many parts of Cameroon, Christians, Muslims and followers of traditional religions live in mixed communities, working together and often belonging to the same local tribes. The pope paid tribute to that tradition this morning.
“Cameroon is home to thousands of Christians and Muslims, who often live, work and worship in the same neighborhood,” he said, saying that such solidarity “advances the common good.”
Vatican sources said that in part, the pope hopes examples of Christian-Muslim harmony such as Cameroon will provide an alternative narrative to the “clash of civilizations,” referring to the hypothesis of an inevitable rivalry between the two monotheistic faiths and the cultures they have shaped.
(Allen is NCR senior correspondent. His e-mail address is jallen@ncronline.org.)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
John Allen is in Africa covering Pope Benedict XVI’s March 17-23 trip to Cameroon and Angola. Watch the NCR web site for his daily reports.
Reports he has already filed include:
- Pope unveils African Synod preparation paper
- Imam speaks of Christian-Muslim peace
- Pope demands halt to sexual, financial scandals
- Pope's condom message resonates with many
- Pope addresses corruption, conflict in Africa
- 'Africa in miniature,' warts and all, awaits Benedict
- Five reasons the papal trip to Africa is important
- Cameroon journalist warns of 'cheap political points' from pope’s visit
- Benedict needs to show that he 'gets' Africa
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~







Well, at least the Pope has
Well, at least the Pope has the nonviolent Crusades to back his words!!
AND IN THE MADISON DIOCESE
AND IN THE MADISON DIOCESE UNDER MORLINO:
"faith divorced from reason, meanwhile, becomes fundamentalism and intolerance, which one sees in some currents in the Islamic world"
"... faith divorced from
"... faith divorced from reason, meanwhile, becomes fundamentalism and intolerance, which one sees in some currents in the Islamic world."
One sees this in some currents in the Christian world as well.
The article states: 'In a
The article states:
'In a recent preface to a book by Italian philosopher and politician Marcello Pera, the pope asserted that inter-religious dialogue, “strictly speaking, is impossible,” because it means setting aside one’s own religious identity.'
Well, first of all, why is Ratzinger so directly throwing the Seat of Peter behind this Italian politician? Is this like the way Chaput and others tried in vain to sway the American elections?
Second of all, what is written here flies in the face of everything evolved through and since the Second Vatican Council and its spirit of ecumenism, whose acceptance Ratzinger did not present as a pre-condition for those he recently so unconditionally reverse excommunicated, circumventing in this way the proper procedures of repentence laid out in Canon Law. He did more of a W Bush Presidential Pardon than any kind of formal de-excommunication, and here he again expresses his locomotive thrust back to the Fifties.
I will read Phan instead, and Dupuis, and the rest sooner than this, which is to despair and cry out loud in anguish: "Dude! Where's MY Church?!"
Or I will read once more His esteemed Eminence Richard Cardinal Cushing, Archbishop of Boston, who, in a private interview with Albert J. Menendez in the process of that writer's preparing John F. Kennedy: Catholic and Humanist (Prometheus Books, NY, 1978) declared: "John F. Kennedy and Pope John XXIII were the great pioneers of what we now call the ecumenical spirit which is intended to wipe away all forms of bigotry by knowing, respecting, and esteeming the religious beliefs of all peoples . . .I always felt that JFK was a forerunner in this field . . .because he never allowed his faith to interfere n any way with his relations with others. He was the greatest representative of brotherhood."
I guess now all involved would be rushed out of Madison on a rail, and not receive any papal prefaces to their published treatises. Once more in our Church, bigotry is big; bigotry is back. Bigotry is blessed.
Dude. Where's my Church?
I not sure the Holy Father is
I not sure the Holy Father is right when he says that religion rejects violence. I know some religious people who support abortion rights.
Once more, we find ourselves
Once more, we find ourselves in seeing evil outside the system while being blind to injustice and violence within. How does a Church who has condoned the death of untold millions in the name of Jesus have the gall self-righteously to accuse another religious system of violence? This Church officially stood by in silence while 6,000,000 Jews and more than 5,000,000 were exterminated by the Nazi machine; will it now wring its hands over the wrongs of others?
When will Jesus become central to this Church whose main function seems to have been, as Tolstoy pointed out, to give villains, thieves, and power mongers permission to oppress others for their gain in the name of Jesus--or rather in the teeth of Jesus own vision? The beams in our own eyes are legion; once we begin to admit that they are there and then begin to remove them--only then will we be a credible witness to peace, justice, and non-violence. We ought to be ashamed of the message of a man who should know much better since his own nation has yet to repent of the Holocaust and who has raised suspicion about his own attitude toward that horrendous event by embracing those who deny its very existence.
Scapegoating is the tool of cowards and of those who wish to wrap themselves in a cloak of good to hide the corruption within. In this time of Lent, can we finally admit to the sinfulness of the Church itself and then we may have some slight justification for pointing out the faults of others?
Bob Sauerbrey
SE Indiana
With regard to agreement on
With regard to agreement on abortion: The Muslim faith allows abortions up to a certain date; I think it notes it as up to the time of "quickening." Please correct me if I am incorrect on this.3L6xj
"Genuine religion...rejects
"Genuine religion...rejects all forms of violence and totalitarianism." This from the head of the institution that launched the Crusades and burned "heretics" and "witches" at the stake. I keep hearing how brilliant Benedict is supposed to be, but it seems to me that he rarely, if ever, thinks through anything he is about to say. On the other hand, perhaps he does not count it as violence when the Church kills, but as an act of "love".
OR perhaps he's aware that
OR perhaps he's aware that the buring of heretics was 5 centuries ago and the Crusades were 10.
Dear orion 71 You make an
Dear orion 71
You make an intersting point about the crusades, but they are getting a bit dated. If you are looking for a modern example of a vioilen organization, try the Democratic party. They "unequivocally support" the killing of 47 million children, and they want to force all us to pay for millions more.
If the Pope fully believes as
If the Pope fully believes as he preaches that religion rejects all violence he needs to rethink his and the Vatican's response to the horror of clergy sexual abuse. Each day that the all too many bishops remain unpunished for their failure to act, the hierarchy in the Catholic Church continues to commit violence against us.
all human beings have
all human beings have committed violence, before, during and post religion.People reguardless of our religion and culture, we know a better way. Let's learn from our violent history and adjust to modern times.Let's lay down our stones, stop blaming each other and try peace.Now.
Post new comment