65 million reasons to be thankful

Bishops struggling to promote their narrow vision of marriage

Nov. 27, 2009
Gay marriage supporters watch election results in Maine (CNS photo)
Printer-friendly versionPrinter-friendly versionSend to friendSend to friendPDF versionPDF version

Commentary

This Thanksgiving comes one week after the United States bishops released a document that, among other things, condemned same-gender marriage and three weeks after the bishops helped defeat marriage equality in Maine. Friends often ask how I remain Catholic. I respond that there are millions of reasons that I am thankful to be a Catholic—and not a Catholic bishop.

On Nov. 3, Maine suffered a profound setback in its march towards marriage equality for its state’s citizens. The loss came after Maine’s Catholic diocese waged a lengthy and costly battle against the rights of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) people to have the same legal protections as heterosexual couples. The state’s Commission on Governmental Ethics and Election Practices has since revealed that the Diocese spent $553,608.27 on the campaign. Nearly half of the funds came not from anti-gay parishioners in Maine, but from anti-gay Catholic bishops around the country. (See the NCR story here.)

Fifty-seven different bishops ranging from the Diocese of Phoenix to the Diocese of Pittsburgh contributed money, either personally or under the auspices of the diocese or a diocesan fund, to the Catholic Diocese of Maine’s campaign against marriage equality.(To see if your diocese gave money to defeat marriage equality, click here.)

But while certain bishops are contributing money to defeat the potential for all families to have equal protections under law, many Catholic laity are exemplary in their espousal of equality. In fact, of all Christian denominations, Catholics are the most favorable toward LGBT acceptance in the U.S. with 58% of Catholics believing that homosexuality should be accepted by society (Public Religion Research, 2008).

And while Catholics overall are evenly divided on the question of marriage equality with a provision for religious exemptions, in a few short years that is certain to change. The youngest generation of Catholics between 18 and 29 years of age are 60 percent in favor of full marriage equality (Public Religion Research, 2008). And the corresponding numbers across other generations are also growing.

The bishops know this and are struggling to promote their narrow vision of marriage. Last week the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops issued a “pastoral letter” on marriage that was anything but pastoral.

Instead of looking at the very real problems modern couples face, such as economic hardship, lack of health care and other obstacles to a healthy and life-giving union, the bishops decided to condemn practices that in their minds lead to the degradation of heterosexual marriage such as contraceptive use and same-gender marriage, among other things. Although one wonders from where the bishops are drawing their conclusions: Massachusetts, the first state to legalize same-gender marriage, was recently found to have the lowest divorce rate of any state!

While the bishops attempt to impose their circumscribed views on Catholics, most of the faithful have made up their own minds on these issues. The majority of Catholics believe that the final moral authority on beliefs about gays and lesbians rests not with the bishops, but with their own conscience. In 1987, 26% of the Post-Vatican II Generation felt that the bishops had the final moral authority on the question of “homosexual behavior.” By 2005, the number had dropped to a mere 19% (American Catholics Today, 2007).

Perhaps even more surprising is the shift happening among the Pre-Vatican II Generation. During the same time period, 13% of the oldest generation of Catholics changed their views so that now only 33% believe that the bishops hold the final moral authority on attitudes towards gays and lesbians.

Just this week I saw firsthand the way that the bishops’ pastoral, while devastating, does not reflect the growing sentiment of equality that is held by the majority of Catholics. I received a call from a campus minister in Ohio who was trying to find a welcoming Catholic Church for a young bisexual woman who was headed home to Iowa. Our office was able to put her in touch with a local chapter leader so that the young woman would be able to find a faith community she could call home. While the bishops may issue a “pastoral letter” every now and again, millions of other Catholics are being pastoral each and every day.

When one stops gazing only at the 258 active Catholic bishops, but instead takes a good look at the approximately 65 million Catholics in the United States and their growing acceptance of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people, there emerges much hope for the future of our church and society.

So this Thanksgiving, I am proud to call myself Catholic and I am counting my reasons: all 65 million of them.

[Nicole Sotelo is the author of Women Healing from Abuse: Meditations for Finding Peace, published by Paulist Press, and coordinates www.WomenHealing.com. A graduate of Harvard Divinity School, she currently works at Call To Action.]

My bad... I thought this

My bad... I thought this article was going to be about being thankful about things that are truly Catholic such as the Eucharist, our Liturgy, Jesus Christ, the Saints, Our Mother Mary, the Rosary, the Holy Trinity, and many more.

I can't imagine ever being thankful for people that take it upon themselves to decide what is Good and Evil (i.e. Adam and Eve).

Ana Worry when when religious

Ana

Worry when when religious or political leaders sit like birds of prey on the "Tree of the Knowledge of good and evil"(the perogative of ancient kings) and consider it their bloody duty to prune of the "Tree of Life".

The wisdom of Jesus is much greater. Let the wheat and the tars grow together, he said. The Sun shines on the just and unjust, alike.

Don't weed the crop, don't snuff out the sun for some. We never know, nor should we presume to. We are only human and no amount of projecting our arrogant qualities onto our Church however happy it may be to embody them, changes that.

"The Lord God", said the greatest of the 20th Century theologians, Karl Barth, "may be be more liberal than we think or like".

According to Mark's Gospel the seeds of the Word grow in ways that become unrecognizable even for the one who planted them. It's really none of our business and woe to them so possessed as to presume to make it theirs.

Former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger, a Jewish refugee from Nazi Europe, knew what what Jesus meant. The great problem, Kissinger said," is not so is much the control of wickness as it is the limitation of righteousness".

Christianity,unfortunately,has evolved or perhaps declined to the point where asking the Church to give up moralism is like asking a bank to give up money.

What is good? Barth asked. "Good", he said, "is to be grateful for God's grace." What is evil? "Evil" , Barth said, "is not to be grateful for God's grace." Anything else? "No", Barth said,"Nothing else!".

And this, from a man who not only stood up to the Nazis and looked evil in the eye, but whose Church Dogmatics consists of some 6 million words. That is the greatness of Karl Barth. That is also the Veritatis Splendor, the splendor of truth.

No birds of prey here and no scribes taking a moral erasure the scroll of creation.

But rather what,from a Catholic point of view, might be called a Eucharistic ethic- a word that means "thanks giving".

So I hope you had a good one -

Michael McIntyre

Ottawa, Canada

It is because of articles

It is because of articles like this that I won't subscribe to NCR. I don't want in any way to support with my money the alternative magisterium proposed by overly self-confident--and sadly over-assimilated--northeast and left coast "catholics".

If you don't subscribe to NCR

If you don't subscribe to NCR then why are you reading this article online. I think there is a real saddness out there in the Catholic Church. We are to judge not so that we will not be judged. Do you really believe that someone chooses to be homosexual? They are born into that life and God is their creator.

This can be said about any

This can be said about any other deviate behavior.

Dude, I am like, so,

Dude, I am like, so, SouthWest, if I were any more SouthWest I would be in the great Chihuahuan state of Mexico (which I was, for dinner tonight, as every night, in solitude, as each and every night, with a cold plate of guacamole, as I do, well, like, you get the picture . . .).

Northeast? "Left coast?" Pull-Ease!

The National Catholic Reporter is the only English language Roman Catholic periodical to which we true and faithful Roman Catholics may in all confidence subscribe and wholeheartedly support. In fact, having already sent in my annual appeal envelope to the NCR a month back, I am wondering whether they might accept a second envelope so soon, from an old and poor desert hermit whose solitude is so overflowingly filled with NCR's Love light and joy-filling grace a Faith community of which I am deeply grateful, now a near half century.

Wonderfully hopeful article

Wonderfully hopeful article to those who struggle with belonging to a church which is fighting to regain top down dominance. I guess the message is an affirmation that the Holy Spirit is alive and inspiring Her people from the bottom up. Hopefully those at the top will see that real morality is accomplished one person at a time, the model that Jesus used, not what happened after his church set up headquarters in Rome.

Gay marriage has been

Gay marriage has been defeated everywhere it has been put to a vote, despite you finding "majorities" supporting it. What you seem to mean by "welcoming Catholic Church" is also disturbing in that you seem to mean one that will look the other way when people are living sinful lifestyles.

We are all sinners. We all

We are all sinners. We all live sinful lifestyles. We are not to judge each other, but to leave that up to God alone. We are to minister to each other, even though they (and we) continue to sin. We are to invite sinners into our homes (and into our Church) and pray with them, pray for them and pray that our own sins will be forgiven. We do not get to judge which sin is more offensive to God: our inability to minister to the sinner or their sin itself. I do not ask my Church to offer the sacrament of marriage to a gay couple. But as an American, I believe in the separation of church and state. Civil unions, even among heterosexuals, do not degrade what the Church has made holy for me. Many will eat bread, yet not receive the Eucharist. Many will celebrate Christmas without celebrating the birth of Jesus (The) Christ. But I will invite the lesbian relative to my Christmas celebration, break bread with her and include her in the prayer at my table, I will invite her to Midnight Mass. I am not looking the other way, but I am not judging her sins.

You will not judge her, but

You will not judge her, but will you offer guidance? Would you invite the male relative you have known to be cheating on his wife? If you did, would you admonish him for his adultery? Liberals wont judge because they cannot tell right from wrong. They are mired in their "tolerance" which will drag their souls to hell

Hmmm, I have invited such a

Hmmm, I have invited such a male relative to my table. And darn, if I look around that table, everyone has multiple sins. I can judge right from wrong. I feel quite comfortable admonishing myself and my children as they are still children. I can confess and ask for forgiveness and repent, as can my children. However, I do not invite others into my home to shame them. My grandparents were lovely Christians; my dad is an angry atheist. However, in my home, we hold hands around the table to pray before our meals and my dad holds hands, bows his head and sits quietly. I am commanded to honor my father (and mother...who often attends these meals, though she is a divorcee, yet another sinner, and no I do not counsel them to make amends) though he does not keep his commandment to honor God. I pray that by offering a Christian example, he will find his way back to God, before his final hour. I try to follow the Ten Commandments and the two that Jesus reminded us encompasses all ten, ‘“You shall love the Lord your God with your whole heart, and with your whole soul, and with all your mind.” This is the greatest and first commandment. The second is like it: “You shall love your neighbor as yourself.” On these two commandments the whole law is based, and the prophets as well.’ —Matthew 22:37-40 Saint Joseph Edition. I am a "liberal" and I am offended that you would consider that my "tolerance" would drag my soul to hell.

All of those votes are

All of those votes are illegitimate. In a society based on natural rights, you do not put the rights of others to a vote.

Our hierarchy has been

Our hierarchy has been exhibiting profoundly partisan, anti-Gospel values. The idea of the bishops spending ANY money on this-ESPECIALLY in this economy when there are so many fundamental needs, like food, shelter and healthcare, going unmet is evidence that my Catholic Church is being led into sin. "Follow the smoke of homophobia, and inevitably you will find the fire of unconscious, unintegrated, homosexuality." Disgusting.

Matthew 25 41"Then he will

Matthew 25
41"Then he will say to those on his left, 'Depart from me, you who are cursed, into the eternal fire prepared for the devil and his angels. 42For I was hungry and you gave me nothing to eat, I was thirsty and you gave me nothing to drink, 43I was a stranger and you did not invite me in, I needed clothes and you did not clothe me, I was sick and in prison and you did not look after me.'

44"They also will answer, 'Lord, when did we see you hungry or thirsty or a stranger or needing clothes or sick or in prison, and did not help you?'

45"He will reply, 'I tell you the truth, whatever you did not do for one of the least of these, you did not do for me.'

46"Then they will go away to eternal punishment, but the righteous to eternal life."

Should the Bishops and the

Should the Bishops and the Church spend money and get involved in the political situation in Uganda to repeal the new law that provides for the Death Penalty for certain homosexual acts? By your logic, the Bishops should stay out of that issue too. And they should not speak out on the healt care bill either, or immigration, or any other issue since there are political consequences. Just tell everyone that Jesus loves them and they will all get to heaven as long as they don't judge anything and be a good person.

Good point, but here's the

Good point, but here's the problem: When I put money in the collection basket, I expect that money to be spent maintaining my parish and its staff, for educational purposes, and for helping the needy--wherever they may be. I do NOT expect my money to be given to an outside political action group of ANY kind. Once that money is given to a PAC (in this case, the group that successfully overturned the gay marriage law in Maine), that group is free to give it to any politician it deems friendly to their cause. Using political "middle-men" destroys transparency. Transparency is necessary for our democracy to function the way it is supposed to.

Giving money to outside political groups could also jeopardize the church's tax exempt status. This does not mean that the church cannot or should not speak out on public policy. A diocese or archdiocese is free to pay its own lobbyist directly. It should keep an honest accounting of how that money is spent and register according to the laws of the state in which it is located.

Deeply disappointing to

Deeply disappointing to discover my local US diocese in Las Cruces through in even a token $200, when our families are in such great need.

Even more shocking are the tens of thousands of dollars sent from Phoenix, where families are being ripped apart by the "toughest sheriff in America" and where so many suffer from the coming cold, and homelessness, and hunger. Fifty thousand dollars could have bought a lot of little kids a lot of winter coats in that cold high desert; instead all of that money goes to Maine, where children also suffer deep poverty and extreme cold and hunger, unknown.

Can't you just hear the old boys having what lawyers call a pissing contest claiming I am more Catholic than you because I wasted more thousands of diocesan dollars to this lobbyist will-o'the-wisp? Philadelphia also coughed up fifty thousand dollars instead of helping the homeless, jobless, families suffering there this winter.

Diocesan dollars wasted in this way hurts heterosexual families as well as those seeking legal protection at probate court.

See? There IS equity! Everyone gets hurt!

What would Jesus do?

Remember the parable of the buried talents. Jesus teaches how several stewards handled money left in their care. Some heard from the Master for their wise handling of what was left in their care: "His master said to him, 'Well done, good and faithful slave. You were faithful with a few things, I will put you in charge of many things; enter into the joy of your master.'"

Please see the Reverend Father John Dear SJ's excellent and edifying commentary upon this text over at

www.fatherjohndear.org/sermons_homilies/welldoneservant.html

What will the Master say to these hierarchical stewards who answer, "No. I did not give it to the poor. Not to peace. I gave it to political lobbyists!"

I want to commend Nicole

I want to commend Nicole Sotelo for her insightful statement. I am one of those 65,000,000 Catholics (yes, even one of the Pre-Vatican II generation) who believe that our Catholic-formed consciences are far better guides to Catholic and Christian morality than the views of our narrow minded bishops, whose only interest is retaining their own power -- a power, by the way, which allowed them to continue the sexual abuse of our children by Catholic priests for the better part of the last half century.

I have long since recognized that Our Blessed Lord would not act the way the bishops are acting -- that WE are the true followers of Jesus, not the bishops. So with Nicole, I too express my gratitude for the true Catholics who follow Jesus. God bless us all and God help us to remake our society to make it more in conformity to The Divine Plan.

Ummm, the "Catholic-formed

Ummm, the "Catholic-formed conscience" that you claim to have can only exist if your conscience has been formed by the teachings of the Catholic church. You can't make that claim when you dissent from church teaching and form your conscience based upon your own feelings and opinions. That's called moral relativism.

When you refer to the views

When you refer to the views of the “narrow minded bishops”, what you mean but may not realize is “and the views of that narrow minded Jesus Christ” – for it is His Church and His will that you are so fervently fighting against.

The writer's reasoning is

The writer's reasoning is specious at best. The bishops are not "struggling to promote their narrow vision of marriage." They are vigorously promoting their agenda with impunity and with the financial support of the 65 million Catholics to whom the article refers. Most important is the fact that there are no authoritative Catholic voices publicly admonishing them. And there is not a shred of evidence that the bishops' pronouncement doesn't reflect the Church's institutional stance. Quite the contrary, it is the Church's institutional stance at the highest level.

Ms. Sotelo is kidding herself if she thinks her own disagreement and tepid criticism provide any sort of meaningful counterweight to what the bishops are doing. Perhaps the institution will someday reflect the more enlightened views of the laity. But how long will that take if it happens at all? And what about the damage that's done by the institution and its leaders in the meantime? And, by the way, are there examples Ms. Soleto might cite about instances where the Church changed its institutional position to reflect more progressive values of the people in the pews?

She can rationalize however much she wants but as long as she is a Catholic, the values of the Church as expressed by its bishops are the values she is ultimately supporting.

"SQ2S" That's textspeak for

"SQ2S" That's textspeak for "snickering quietly to self."

George is right of course,

George is right of course, when he says "as long as she is a Catholic, the values of the Church as expressed by its bishops are the values she is ultimately supporting."

So there is really only one way, and that is to leave this corrupt, criminal, organisation, neither supporting it with your presence or your money.

It is quite possible to be a loving Christian, supporting the poor, the downtrodden, the outcasts of this society, as Jesus would want you to do, without being a member of a church that does not reflect these values.

Do George and Michael here

Do George and Michael here deny the doctrine of Free Will?

Then they deny the Tridentine Decree on Justification, which is "grounds for expulsion from membership in the Catholic Church (HarperCollins Encyclopedia on Catholicism, article on Free Will)."

Thank you for the perspective

Thank you for the perspective you offer.
As I scan the list of donors, I once more am glad to be in the diocese of Rochester, NY.

Have you no poor this winter

Have you no poor this winter in Rochester? Have you no children without coats, without food, without health care, without love, without homes, without family?

Have you no elderly with no one to care for them, to visit them?

Have you no imprisoned with no one to visit them as Jesus commands near the end of Matthew 25?

41"Then he will say to those on his left, 'Depart from me, you who are cursed, into the eternal fire prepared for the devil and his angels. 42For I was hungry and you gave me nothing to eat, I was thirsty and you gave me nothing to drink, 43I was a stranger and you did not invite me in, I needed clothes and you did not clothe me, I was sick and in prison and you did not look after me.'

44"They also will answer, 'Lord, when did we see you hungry or thirsty or a stranger or needing clothes or sick or in prison, and did not help you?'

45"He will reply, 'I tell you the truth, whatever you did not do for one of the least of these, you did not do for me.'

46"Then they will go away to eternal punishment, but the righteous to eternal life."

Have you in Rochester no Roman Catholic nuns such as these?

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/11/24/AR200911...

I am still always amazed, as

I am still always amazed, as this article shows, that when it comes to matters of trust, trust the young people! How anyone could be opposed to people in love making love, confounds me. I am convinced that the Jesus I know, looks at our hearts and not our genitals! May God help those entrapped in their age and morbund concepts and bless those with open minds.

Excellent!!! Imagine being

Excellent!!! Imagine being one of the 258 bishops --- with very little respect!

Chuck in Minneapolis

"Massachusetts, the first

"Massachusetts, the first state to legalize same-gender marriage, was recently found to have the lowest divorce rate of any state!"

An interesting fact, but one that fails to prove anything. Take a course in logic.

"The majority of Catholics believe that the final moral authority on beliefs about gays and lesbians rests not with the bishops, but with their own conscience."

I suppose one could then question whether that "majority" is even Catholic at all.

"When one stops gazing only at the 258 active Catholic bishops, but instead takes a good look at the approximately 65 million Catholics in the United States and their growing acceptance of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people, there emerges much hope for the future of our church and society."

When one stops following Jesus of Nazareth and His Church, but instead takes a good look at mammon, there emerges much sadness for the future of our church and society.

I do believe that we as Christians need to break down walls of injustice, even those committed against homosexuals. We as Catholics do need to accept and love all people. As Catholics though we accept them for the fact that they are created in the image of God, not because they are "lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender." When I see editorials like this I understand that the author cares, but all they are going to do is create more harm.

"Massachusetts, the first

"Massachusetts, the first state to legalize same-gender marriage, was recently found to have the lowest divorce rate of any state!"
An interesting fact, but one that fails to prove anything. Take a course in logic."
It's the same logic used by certain (too many) bishops and priests, who denounce same-gender marriage, because it would result in all sorts of moral calamity, particularly threatening heterosexual ("normal") marriage.

There is an inherent, ordered

There is an inherent, ordered nature in Marriage. For this reason, "Fathers and Daughters are not demeaned, their equality is not rejected, their Love not denied, when they are barred from Marrying one another."-Amherst Professor Hadley Arkes

Marriage equality already exists since all Persons must meet the same standards to be Married. Barring same-sex couples from Marriage is not discrimination, nor is refusing to condone homosexual sexual acts or any sexual act that does not respect the Sacredness and Dignity of the Human Person to begin with.

What did Jesus say on the

What did Jesus say on the matter?

Matthew 25 gives a clue:

41"Then he will say to those on his left, 'Depart from me, you who are cursed, into the eternal fire prepared for the devil and his angels. 42For I was hungry and you gave me nothing to eat, I was thirsty and you gave me nothing to drink, 43I was a stranger and you did not invite me in, I needed clothes and you did not clothe me, I was sick and in prison and you did not look after me.'

44"They also will answer, 'Lord, when did we see you hungry or thirsty or a stranger or needing clothes or sick or in prison, and did not help you?'

45"He will reply, 'I tell you the truth, whatever you did not do for one of the least of these, you did not do for me.'

46"Then they will go away to eternal punishment, but the righteous to eternal life."

Any Catholic bishop who has

Any Catholic bishop who has raised money to defeat equal rights for LGBT human beings should be investigated by the IRS for crossing over the line of separation of church and state. The bishops are actively campaigning for removal of BASIC rights of people who are or are not Catholics. This should lead to a loss of TAX EXEMPT status. If a few cases go to the courts and win, it could radically change the tune these right wing bishops are singing. Bigotry, hatred and disenfranchisement are the key elements behind the bishop's actions to prevent marriage equality. These are the opposite of the love Christ expressed for all of us. The cult like following of reactionary right wingers in the Catholic Church is mirrored in the Protestant Fundamentalist Churches like those of Pat Robertson and the late Jerry Falwell. The same kind of thinking and the same hate filled and violent motives. Most, but not all Catholic bishops do not know how to exercise pastoral care to human beings who come from the LGBT community. This is a pathetic indictment of the crop of hierarchy that John Paul and Benedict have created. They are talking heads for the Vatican line. There are always a few courageous bishops out there who stand up for what is fair and use good ethics but we all know that they are few in number. The corruption of the majority of the cardinals and bishops is so wide spread that the imperial model of the Latin Rite Churches is about to implode. Ignorance is no excuse for the unethical and violent behavior of the hierarchy. They must be taken on and I can think of no greater way to serve Christ and His Church than to drag them to Court and expose and prosecute them for their criminal behavior regarding the cover up of child sex abuse by clergy and some members of the hierarchy itself. They haven't spent a day behind bars in a prison for their crimes. This should also apply to their active campaign to cause great harm to gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgendered people by denial of equal rights under the law. Expose these hypocrites, the time for action is NOW.

Pray, be specific, in what

Pray, be specific, in what document of America's founding, in which the basic rights of all citizens are outlined, would one find the right for a gay man or lesbian woman to marry another gay or lesbian? You see, I have checked but cannot locate that particular right.

Also, the bishops HAVE NOT stepped over any such line as "separation of church and state" (also, a term not used in any founding document, but why should that stop us from making stuff up?). The bishops have, in no way, told their people who to vote for, or even what to vote for. Rather, they outline the Church's teachings (as they are supposed to do!) and informed the faithful in their dioceses that Catholics are obliged to uphold, accept and support those teachings. No one is going to force one to vote in a manner consistent with Catholic belief, and if one chooses not to, then they have made that choice and will accept those consequences, if any. No one is forced to be Catholic.

Mr. Smith echoes what is the usual mantra, trotted out every time the bishops, the Church, take a public stand on a moral issue: the sexual abuse crisis; a crisis which was resolved back in 2002. It represents the typical attacks of those who long to see the Catholic Church become what the mainline Protestant communities already are: toothless and decayed, accepting as Gospel truth any new idea or belief in morality and ethics and never standing in opposition to anything.

I can see that many folks are fired up or passionate about the "right" to marry whomever, or whatever, one wishes. Would that they were fired up, passionate, about something that is morally right and praiseworthy, rather than something that is intrinsically immoral. I suppose the fact that it is condemned by both the Old and New Testaments, by 2000 years of Christian teaching and doctrine, by all the major religions "Of the Book" -- Christianity, Judaism, and Islam means nothing compared to the fact that the majority of people, according to some poll or another, in the United States support gay marriage. Opinion polls, in other words, carry more moral weight for some than does Scripture and 2000 years of Sacred Tradition. Talk about pathetic...

Finally, I simply ask why people remain "Catholic" in name, when they are clearly not Catholic in belief? They want to pick and choose what they will believe, what they will accept, just as many of the Lord's followers wanted to do. However, at least those folks, when confronted with a teaching (such as the teaching on eating Jesus' Body and drinking His Blood in John's Gospel, or the rich young man who refused to sell all his possessions and follow Jesus) that they simply refused to accept, had the integrity to walk away.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Separation_of_church_and_state

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Bill_of_Rights

and especially

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Life,_liberty_and_the_pursuit_of_happiness

You cannot see the difference between civil and canon law. We do not impose our Church law upon civilians who do not choose our Church to settle their personal probate matters, which is really all this civil arrangement is, a matter for probate.

Our Church's sacraments remain inviolate, and above such minor civil matters. We do not presume the power of dictating through civil and criminal law the lives of those who do not now chose our morality, having never effectively heard the Word nor been received in a perceptible manner into this loving and pastoral Communion of Saints.

These politicized bishops through wasting our precious church resources upon lawyers rather than upon pastoral matters such as our elderly nuns in their distressing, abominable abandonment (perhaps you did not have the time to read well the Reverend Sister Maureen Fiedler's recent column on the Oblates) further demonstrate the paucity of their pastoral ministry, the poverty of our pulpits, the emptiness of our pews, the impotence of their preaching and example to impart morality to our society, but in vain resort to paying political lobbyists to enforce ineffectually morality through civil law.

What would Jesus have us do?

Read once more and weep in the English translation of your own choosing Matthew 25:41ff

Judge not lest ye be judged.

Thank you for the link to the

Thank you for the link to the list of contributors. It is impossible to tell what it means about the dioceses or bishops that did not contribute, but it does provide an indication of where some orthodox Catholics can be found.

Civil marriage should be

Civil marriage should be regulated by civil law, unbiased by religion.

If a couple wishes to have a religious ceremony & have their marriage recognized by a specific religion/denomination, then they should be able to do that following their civil marriage. Their choice, not an obligation.

Many countries do marriage contracts in this manner...

Marriage may be an outmoded as such...it only served to make sure that a man got control of the woman's financial/real estate assets...

As a straight Catholic male,

As a straight Catholic male, I am so embarrassed that our archbishop, Joseph Kurtz, was the major drafter of the recent bishops' "pastoral" (lolol) on marriage.

He also donated personal money to the Maine bigotry initiative, not to mention authorizing archdiocesan funds to this shameful cause.

He ordered the installation/reinstallation of kneelers in Louisville archdiocesan churches (never mind that Jesus and his Jewish disciples would have stood at prayer).

Pope Bennie: If you're reading this thread, please --- I beseech you --- give this out-of-state hierarch a red hat and --- I beseech you further --- a "do nothing" job inside the bowels of the Vatican.

Thank you, sir.

God knows, Kurtz can only inflict more crap on the Catholics of Central Kentucky!

KNEELERS?! IN A CHURCH?!

KNEELERS?! IN A CHURCH?! SCANDAL!!!!

Get down from your high horse.

"Every kneel shall bend and every tongue confess that Jesus CHrist is Lord."

Kneeling before our Lord is what expresses devotion and humility! Get down from your "power to the people" 1960's theology. Kneeling and showing humility and respect to Christ is why we kneel. What right do priests have to take kneelers out of churches?!

A person can just as easily

A person can just as easily be astride their high horse whilst on their knees, which is more in line with the focus of what Jesus came to remind people. A person can indeed be prostrating themselves before man and God whilst judging his neighbor. That is where the important point is: what is in the heart.

I concur that what is in the

I concur that what is in the heart is important. I'm not saying that a person who kneels is neccessarily better than a person who does not.

Yet what is in the liturgy is EXTREMELY important. How we act in the liturgy is so important. The music, the atmosphere, the motions and prayers said...it is all so important that it can never be understated. Abbot Suger believed that when one walks into a Church it should be as if walking into another world! Interesting words, would you not say?

Liturgy cannot be viewed as merely some subjective community experience. It is where we come to see God! The duty of the Catholic Church is to pay God the worship He deserves from us! It is to use our frail bodies to pay homage to God in the most beautiful way possible! Kneeling before God, showing humility and submission to God, is why having kneelers is so important.

Therefore, when the ancient

Therefore, when the ancient Jews --- including Jesus --- stood at prayer/worship, they did not demonstrate "humility and submission to God?"

Are you serious???

"What right do priests have

"What right do priests have to take kneelers out of churches?"

What right do they have to put them in???

Nicole this is a very

Nicole this is a very encouraging column in very discouraging times. Here in Phoenix, our bishop has contributed $50,000 to the Maine campaign against equality in marriage, and has signed the now infamous 'Manhattan Declaration'. Many of us pray that he will soon be made a Cardinal and sent
to Rome. There is immeasurable harm being done by all this within and outside the Church. God help us.

well, at least that diocesan

well, at least that diocesan money did not go into funding Rode's political inquisition of our Roman Catholic religious women . . .

There is nothing to be

There is nothing to be thankful for here. If one hopes in evil or the potential triumph of evil, not only does he not truly hope at all but if he know he is acting contrary to the will of God he is among the lowest of the low. It might give people the warm and fuzzies to play the "I'm OK, you're OK" game, but in the end everyone involved is sorely mistaken if they seek to cling to what appears to be good in the darkness rather than embrace what is truly good in the light.

In this case, It is a cause for shock and sorrow that people are losing the ability to realize equal respect for persons who are afflicted with terrible disorders as for those unafflicted does not mean that we need tom indeed we should NEVER, act in such a way as to normalize the impulses caused by such disorders.

Lord knows I have my own sins, but I fully expect that my sins be condemned as evil, I sure do. There is shame and sorrow for the pebbles and stones that weigh me down, because they make me less Christian, less truly human, every time I surrender to them. If every anyone tried to tell me my vices are not so bad, that would be a supreme act of unlove no matter how warm and fuzzy they made us both feel.

What if homosexuality is not

What if homosexuality is not a disorder? What if it's simply part of God's plan?

My brother is gay. He doesn't seem disordered to me at all. He's just as he's ever been.

You wrote: "On Nov. 3, Maine

You wrote: "On Nov. 3, Maine suffered a profound setback in its march towards marriage equality for its state’s citizens."

That is a lie. What happened was that Maine failed in it's attempted lie to claim that any union not between a man and a woman could be a marriage. From the creation of the human race ("male and female He created them") only that union is the proper one, is possible as a "marriage."

What happened in Maine is simply that the bishops were succesful in defending the truth.

civil law is not sacramental

civil law is not sacramental theology.

The "marriage" defined in the proposed civil code is in no way equivalent to our sacrament of matrimony.

The "marriage" described is simply a way through other civil law, including what is encountered in probate court.

In no way is our sacrament violated.

It is in fact apples and oranges.

Does your Church really recognize a simply civil marriage? Do priests not still consider for sacramental purposes those married by the state to be merely cohabiting?

I am a new Catholic and would

I am a new Catholic and would be very interested in knowing what these percentages are among practicing Catholics who attend Mass weekly, etc.

I don't know that including everyone who calls themselves "Catholic" is really honest, since many seem almost to see "Catholic" as an ethnicity (like Jews vs. Judaism).

It appears that the current

It appears that the current crop of bishops are working overtime to make themselves irrelevant to the laity. We long for the generation of bishops who produced the pastorals on War and Peace and the Economy 30 years ago.

The information you have

The information you have publicize is sad but thank you for helping us nderstand what the Bishops are doing. My question: where does the money come from? I contribute money to the Church to support the church's legitimate activities, mainly help to the poor. Certainly not to promote the bishop's narrow political views, just as not to pay out billions in the abuse cases where the bishop's shielded offenders.

How refreshing to look at the

How refreshing to look at the real faith of the beleivers and in contrast with the narrow view of apparachnics who use people money to promote objective that seem so far from the action of Jésus.

So what? Divine revelation is

So what?

Divine revelation is not dictated by votes or popular opinion. Get over it.
You think statistics really move those of us Catholics who adhere to the Catholic faith in its entirety? You offer no theological or philosophical counter-arguments against the Catholic position. You merely play on emotional strings.

I do not believe in discrimination against gays. Honestly I care little about the gay marriage being accepted in society. The Church will not be permitting the sacrament of holy matrimony to be confered on gays. Its not about prejudice, it is about doing the will of God.

I also question what the word "pastoral" means to you. Apparently, and do correct me if I am wrong, a whole "do as you deem correct" attitude? Nicole, faith can not be something that is subjective and based on what one feels. If you know people who are gay or are themselves and have seen discrimination I am sorry. The CCC states that hatred of homosexuals is a sin. Yet please do understand that we Catholics cannot accept gay marriage for various theological and philosophical reasons.

Often when people look to

Often when people look to them selves and their own understanding to discern God's will, The devil jumps in and grabs victory for himself to the hurt of the very people God is helping. I'm so sorry TPTB are trying to fight against a natural and harmless behavior that God really never condemned. Homosexuals do not pose a problem for the church the church poses a problem for innocent homosexuals who want to marry the one they love.
With the divorce rate as high as it is in the Christian Right,How dare they point the finger at Gay men and women? Glean up your own house first! Get the lumber out of your own eye, then you will be able to see what is causing such a disgraceful divorce rate among your own people. Tend to your own sins first.
Were you serving God when you condemned so many to burn at the stake for the heresy of believing the earth was round? How many *witches* did you burn who turned out to be harmless if crabby old women who had no one to protect them from the church. How many people did you condemn as heretics for believing The earth circled the sun?
Your reasoning is just as unsound and just as self serving now. Do you think God will miss your sin, Because you accuse others so vehemently?

I'm sad that Nicole Setelo

I'm sad that Nicole Setelo writes as if she is the only Catholic with the correct understanding on this matter and that everyone with a different understanding is somehow, a dinosaur.
Nicole does not address any of the matters which the Church uses to explain its teachings on why same-sex people are excluded from marriage.
Gender.
The rights of the child for an environment in which to grow up, an environment that can naturally and adequately address all the psycho-sexual-spiritual-physical needs.
etc

"The rights of the child for

"The rights of the child for an environment in which to grow up, an environment that can naturally and adequately address all the psycho-sexual-spiritual-physical needs."
And all that, somehow, is guaranteed by a heterosexual marriage and family.
And all that, somehow, happens in a heterosexual family.
This is the catholic party-line, but is it true? I know lots of kids whose rights to grow up in a nurturing environment, are sadly and often fatally* violated.
* It just so happened that two days ago two siblings (13 and 9) were murdered by their father, who also tried to kill his wife, the mother's childeren; this happened in our neighborhood.
Anecdotal? Yes, Rare? Unfortunately not.

"The rights of the child for

"The rights of the child for an environment in which to grow up, an environment that can naturally and adequately address all the psycho-sexual-spiritual-physical needs."
This is so true! Two days ago, a father in my neighborhood killed his two children, and then tried to kill his wife, the kids' mother.
Anecdotal? Yes. Rare? Unfortunately not.
Not far from my home, there lives a same-gender couple with three kids (2 girls and a boy). The kids are happy, well-adjusted, obviously living in a nurturing environment.
Anecdotal? Yes. Rare? Fortunately not.

What can you possibly know

What can you possibly know about a child's sexual needs Fr Mick when you have repressed yours, or did you have none?

When so many of your ilk have failed, surely more humility is required from the priesthood.

Your article, Nicole,

Your article, Nicole, indicates that Catholics are growing up and realizing that they can make their own decisions by using their God-given gift called a conscience. As a married person, I agree that the new pastoral letter on marriage is lacking anything of real substance for married couples. I wonder what a pastoral letter on marriage would look like if the bishops actually confered with a wide variety of married Catholics and then draw on the wisdom of these couples to write about married life.

Yes, we are to follow our

Yes, we are to follow our conscience, but we first have to make sure that we have properly formed our conscience. As a God-given gift, the conscience must be nurtured and cared for. It must be shaped with the truth, as revealed through Sacred Scripture and Sacred Tradition. A conscience formed by the secular world is an abuse of the gift.

And, please, tell us how you have come to discover that the Bishops did not consult with married persons when writing this pastoral letter? You seem to have some insight that suggests they work in a vacuum, even though I'd be willing to bet that most arch/diocesan and USCCB department staffs are comprised largely of married persons.

At this point I do not

At this point I do not believe that the state should force any religious body to recognize same sex marriages.

But, as a woman very happily married to a man, it is beyond my comprehension how homosexual marriages or civil unions can in any way threaten heterosexual marriages.

If our U.S. Catholic bishops really want to support families, they should work toward an economic renaissance not only in this country but throughout the world.

My son, a seventh grader,

My son, a seventh grader, recently came home from school with a really nice ribbon, recognizing his achievement of the "A Honor Roll". The school thought that the award deserved to be called something more distinguished, so they changed the name to "The Congressional Medal of Honor". Soon thereafter, other schools and school districts adopted the name change, and before you know it (after more than a few lawsuits demanding "award equality"), schools all across the country are awarding "The Congressional Medal of Honor" to students who earned all A's on their report cards. And who really cares, it's just a name; just a man-made institution, right?

Perhaps this example seems a bit ridiculous, but it clearly illustrates that just because we want to call something by a particular name, that doesn't make it so.

But perhaps more importantly, and to the point that SBeth and so many others have raised, that referring to the "A Honor Roll" as the "Congressional Medal of Honor" does in fact harm those recipients, past and future, of the real Congressional Medal of Honor.

And so it is with marriage. We can not arbitrarily refer to any relationship as "marriage" just because we want to. And we must accept that to do so causes confusion and scandal, and at the same time weakens the time-honored institution of marriage as the covenant union between one man and one woman. The effects are felt by those currently in a marriage, as well as those to follow.

jean save

jean save

I too am grateful to be

I too am grateful to be Catholic and likewise fail to comprehend why the bishops focus on Marriage which they do not understand instead of focusing on priestly celibacy which they only pretend to be committed to. But they are very clever at trying to control the lives of the laity. BISHOPS SHOULD HEAL THEMSELVES. I do feel badly for the good priests for believing that they had to relinquish their own consciences in favor of their boss-bishop. Another form of mind control that bishops are so "clever" at.

I am sick and tired of the

I am sick and tired of the "clergy shouldn't talk about marriage because they are celibate" and "there were abusive priests so no one ever has to listen to the bishops again." Such a position betrays a very misguided understanding of the vocations of the clergy and laity in the Church.

They are our bishops. Ontologically endowed with the mission and power to teach sanctify and govern. Individual men may or may not do that well, as history shows, but they do not cease to be worthy by their very nature of respect and obedience. If there is a serious breach on their part, yes, the people of God may respectfully challenge them. However, I have never seen any reason to do so in my diocese, and I see no reason in the vastest majority of dioceses to do so. This is not the middle ages. I submit that those who seize on the mistakes made in handling the scandals of the past decade as a reason not to listen to the successors of the apostles are very disingenuous; few are truly so appalled they lose the capacity to hear the Gospel from these men, most are using it as an excuse not to listen to hard sayings.

As for Celibate clergy. 1. how does it hurt you? why do so many dissidents hate the concept of celibate clergy so viscerally?! Is it sort of like media getting more and more graphic, the culture hates innocence and purity? Yes, some priests have violated their promise, shame on them, but most priests are very faithful and many many of them see their celibacy as a charism. You wouldn't want to stifle the spirit, would you?

As for marriage, any priest worth his salt would not demand that the laity live their marriages in a very particular way, save the bounds of morality, which it is the priest's responsibility to help his people with. As for proper knowledge, Priests come from families, they have that perspective. Priests also do a lot of counseling, marriage or otherwise, they are on a practical basis experts of humanity. The vocation of a priest is to bring the Gospel fuller into view for the people of God, so they can go evangelize the culture, thus they are the bearers of Christ to the bearers of Christ, thus they are ideally experts in humanity with reference to the perfect human. The things the Church says about marriage are drawn from the dictates of the natural order and divine revelation. Priests don't want to run your life, they want to teach and support thier people so that we can all enjoy God's friendship; it is a vocation utterly devoted to service to those called to service, and because of that they are the ones entrusted with leading those called to be leaders in the world.

A bishop couldn't have said

A bishop couldn't have said it any better.........lacks all understanding of the thoughts of Vatican Council II. Totally misses the "new" understanding of the 20th and 21st Centuries given to us by post-Middle Ages theology, philosophy, and science! You must be a priest! [My apologies to modern priests who are up-to-date on their theology!]

What do modern and

What do modern and enlightened people think a priest is? what does he do? why is his life of constant service worth the trouble? how can he fulfill his vocation to spread the gospel and strengthen the people of God if the people of God refuse to listen to the Gospel? How is he to help people cast out their illusory idols and apparent goods and embrace the message of God, the performance of which is selfsame with a happy and flourishing human life?
What is a priest? a celibate social worker?

To teach sanctify and govern are indeed the core components of his vocational mission of servant leadership.

"Ontologically

"Ontologically endowed...."???????????

lolololololololol......................

Last I knew, these guys cr@p just like the rest of us!!!

It's a very sad commentary

It's a very sad commentary that Catholics would accept the notion of "gay marriage" which is an oxymoron. The Church clearly teaches that homosexual activity is immoral and intrinsically evil. The Church has always taught this truth. It is a part of the Catholic tradition and it cannot change. It doesn't matter what the poll numbers are about a majority of Catholics accepting something evil as this.

All that really matters is what God thinks on the matter. God has made his view known through Revelation and the Magisterium of the Catholic Church. When the Catholic Church speaks on a matter of faith or morals through her Magisterium, Christ speaks.

The fact of the matter is that homosexual activity always constitutes the matter for mortal sin. Those "Catholics" who do not accept this truth sin against faith. And sins against faith remove the theological virtue of faith from the soul. Once this virtue is gone, the person is outside the Mystical Body of Christ from which vantage point he or she (in this case) cannot be saved.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <font> <swf> <swf list>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You may use <swf file="song.mp3"> to display Flash files inline

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This is prove you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions. Solve the simple math problem.
9 + 7 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.