Scandal and confusion?

I just read the NCR story on the 8th Day Center for Justice in Chicago and the pressure brought to bear by Cardinal George over a Sept. 8 event in which they showed the film, "Pink Smoke Over the Vatican", and sponsored a talk by Maryknoll priest, Fr. Roy Bourgeois, who has been ordered to recant his public support for women in the priesthood.

According to the story, "George stated the event could lead to scandal and confusion among the faithful over the church's teaching on ordination."

Scandal and confusion? Really? The hierarchy loves to use these words to describe events or statements or publications with which they disagree. And they are ludicrous.

Let's be clear: no one is confused. Every thinking Catholic knows that the Vatican opposes women's ordination, and most know that the vast majority of the laity support it.

And let's be clear about this as well: What we have here is not a "scandal." It's a disagreement. Granted, the hierarchy is outnumbered by Catholics who disagree, and that might be an embarrassment for the hierarchy. But it's not a scandal; it's an issue for serious dialogue and ultimately, change.

The real scandal in the church today is the denial of equality to women, especially in light of the teaching of the Second Vatican Council: "Every type of discrimination based on sex is to be overcome and eradicated as contrary to God's intent." (Church in the Modern World, #29). This is compounded by the attempt to stifle freedom of conscience at the 8th Day Center for Justice and the freedom of the laity to make their concerns about church life and practices known to each other and church leaders.

After years of coddling sex abusers (a real scandal), the hierarchy has lost all credibility even when it comes to using the word.

Maureen, with respect, the

Maureen, with respect, the "vast majority of the laity" do NOT support the ordination of women. If you were to write that the majority of laity in America support this, then, perhaps you would be correct. However, globally that is not the case.

There are 67 million Catholics in the United States, there are 1.2 billion globally. The vast majority are located in South America and Africa, where this is a non-issue. The hierarchy is not "outnumbered" by laity who believe in the ordination of women. Rather, those who support women's ordination are outnumbered by the hundreds of millions who do not as well as the weight of history, tradition, doctrine, and the example of Christ Himself.

Game, set, match.

I dwell, my dearest colleague

I dwell, my dearest colleague Clint, transcending daily our border with Latinamerica (yet you here faciley eradicate the millions of Roman Catholics in Central America, and here in Mexico, which is in North America, despite what Sean Winters wrote). You refer only to South America.

If we limit our conversation only to South America, I urge you, friend Clint, to read the brilliant works in Roman Catholic theology from our beloved Franciscan Friar Boff, now, for this Feast of Saint Francis, particularly upon those points which weigh gender equality and our Faith, as a counterpoint to your unsourced argument to the contrary.

Yet if we may for the nonce extend your inclusiveness to all of what we call Latin America, (which we must admittedly extend quite far northwards to its traditional Hispanic regions of California and points east) we might advantageously view once more these under-exposed photographs from the Cathedral in Ciudad Juarez, where I regularly assist at the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass, and in which we may view a very nice young lady serving as acolyte, as she does each Sunday at the noontime Mass, including, pointedly, the Bishop's Mass, and no one expressing any distress at all, and in fact much pride and affection. In fact she is very welcomed by all, and loved and admired, as is the very nice nun who conducts the paraliturgical celebrations of the Holy Eucharist on those mornings Father is indisposed.

Kindly let me produce these then as case in point, game, set and match; this photographic evidence refuting your bold and unproven yet comfortable claims.

South of here it is not an issue that women run the liturgies, but a blessing and the preservation of our Faith at all, throughout the Latin American mountains, in the absence of the priest who may only visit a few times a YEAR, and also to participate fully in the liturgy in the urban centers even in the presence of a priest. In fact, the norm is for women to run things, in Latin American churches.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/charlesjscanlon/sets/72157627241910949/detail/

http://www.flickr.com/photos/charlesjscanlon/5714205775/in/set-721576262...

Our dear and Reverend Sister Fiedler here advises us that it's a topic for serious dialogue. Notice well this, her phrase, please, and in context. For serious dialogue. Adult, logical and based in fact, not fantasies. Not dissent, but dialogue. We cannot label one thing dissent and the other truth, as we see you here do not speak the truth, my brother. Rather, in truest adherence to our integral and authentic ecclesiology, we must enter into serious dialogue, Clint, serious dialogue, not reinventing the world according to our mistaken paradigms, not even South America.

Dialogue, Clint. I find no evidence supporting the theory you here propose, and find your alluded demographical statistics nonexistent, finding much ethnographical evidence emerging to the contrary, as your friends in Opus Dei acquire episcopal thrones and refuse to service the poor Pilgrim People of God, in the mountains, the barrios, the favelas, where no OD priest enters, and no other priest now ordained, creating a crying need amongst us for our integral liberation.

This is no game, Clint, and you have nothing "won;" it is an opening and opportunity for serious dialogue.

You claim that all "Latin

You claim that all "Latin American Catholics" are hard core Trads who are opposed to the ordination of women, married men, etc. This is not true. If you travelled to "Latin America" or should we say, Mexico, Central America and South America and actually talk to the people, you will be very surprised.
Religion is not a tennis match, and we shall all find out the truth, soon enough.

Game, set, match. Really?

Game, set, match. Really? Scripture actually supports the fact that there were woman deacons. Jesus did not ordain women or men!

You go, Maureen! Thank you

You go, Maureen! Thank you for pointing out, again, that the emperor has no clothes.

Let's be clear maureen: You

Let's be clear maureen: You can't be a priest so stop wasting out time.

Out time? I find the Reverend

Out time? I find the Reverend Sister Maureen Fiedler ALWAYS right IN time, and love to read her each time she can share here, with her other professional broadcast duties.

If you on the other hand find your anonymous time wasted here, why come?
What did you bring to this party?

just asking, out of concern . . .

If anything is "confusing,"

If anything is "confusing," it's how the Church hierarchy has consistently taken Jesus's radical message and distorted it, blunted it, watered it down, and made it conform to a cozy, structured, conventional view so that the bishops and cardinals do not have to experience any jolt to their worldview.

Sister Fiedler, thank you for

Sister Fiedler, thank you for noting the absurdity of our hierarchs' practice of labeling disagreement with official teaching as creating "scandal and confusion".

Unfortunately, too many Catholics today are not "thinking Catholic[s]". They are the weekend pew potatoes who blindly drop their shekels into the collection plate while their hierarchs continue to chip away at the dignity of the laity. These people are the "sheople". If they don't willingly accept papal and episcopal statements "lock, stock, and barrel", they don't bother to challenge official teaching, either, and thus enable continued ecclesial dysfunction.

"Ignorance is bliss" for the hierarchs as they continue to count on most of the "lay faithful" to at least tolerate noninfallible teaching that puts human integrity to shame.

Jesus said, "I am the good shepherd".

Unfortunately, our bishops in Rome and elsewhere believe the Lord was including them in the "I", as well. History, however, has strongly demonstrated otherwise.

Yes, the bishops have lost all moral credibility, but I suspect still too many Catholics still don't "get it".

Sad.

iF YOU DON'T LIKE cATHOLIC

iF YOU DON'T LIKE cATHOLIC TEACHING as "who hears you hear me", then get out, and found a new denomiation!
-- We live under church guidance, and try to be a saint. For you,joining in the church is for a position, you don't have any other place to make known yourself?
Go ahead, either a good Catholic or fight for a position but no in the Catholic Church.

It is truly the leadership

It is truly the leadership that is in schism with the People of God. You want us anonymous "to get out" if we will not follow these fellows that themselves are not following Jesus Christ. They have proven themselves in so many ways not true Christians. It is not a question of getting out, it is a question of informing Catholics what are leadership has become. It is not pretty! So we do not ask you to get out, we the people of God ask you to wake up or share the complicity of this evil leadership.

Learn to spell and organize

Learn to spell and organize your thoughts, if you can.

Anonymous, "Wake up and smell

Anonymous, "Wake up and smell the coffee." There are a lot of things wrong in our church- like priests who abused children and bishops who covered it up, like misuse of church funds, like a hierarchy who thinks "power over" is Christlike and on and on and on. Those of us who "smell the coffee" feel we have to remain in the Church and attempt to change what is so unlike Christ. Excluding women from the priesthood is a man made rule, no one Christ made.

Making yourself and your

Making yourself and your little group seem more powerful than you are, aren't you. 1 bil Catholics in the world and you think that most of us want women for priests. No, the majority will not join in your little rebellion. The independent Catholic movement will eventually form itself into its own pseudo catholic church, that I do not doubt. You keep it. Rah, rah, shish koom ba. The one that makes the most noise wins!

To the moderators. Does that

To the moderators. Does that mean nothing will be posted which might conflict with this woman's absurd statements?

Right on, Maureen! The

Right on, Maureen! The Vatican's arguemnt for denying women priests is so flimsy they have to halt all discussion of it lest they look even more ridiculous.

These anti- women posters

These anti- women posters have the langusge and polls to back up their claims all around the world... NOT

I first saw Ms Fiedler in

I first saw Ms Fiedler in 1980 on television bemoaning the fact that there were no women priests. I listened because I had never seen a nun with blond hair and gold jewelry. Thirty one years later, Ms Fiedler is approaching seventy, and she is still singing the same song. Women will never be ordained in the Catholic Church, One of the reasons the Episcopal church is in schism is because of women's ordination. Why would anyone male or female stay in a church that one feels is oppressive?

I have never seeen Sister

I have never seeen Sister Fiedler, but I find it hard to believe that she would wear jewelry, especially gold jewelry because sshe has taken a vow of poverty.

Ms. Fiedler abandoned her

Ms. Fiedler abandoned her vows of poverty and obdience years ago.

Joe, Do you know that for a

Joe,
Do you know that for a fact or is it just your judgement?

Right on Maureen! You ladies

Right on Maureen! You ladies outlive us men and many women have substantial estates. Remember that there are many worthy charitable entities which do not discriminate against women when you write your will!

As a Catholic woman I don't

As a Catholic woman I don't support women's ordination. Although the "hierarchy" is suspect, I find that there really is scandal in the alternative Church being built, especially when there are alternatives if you don't like the Catholicism.

"Let's be clear: no one is

"Let's be clear: no one is confused. Every thinking Catholic knows that the Vatican opposes women's ordination, and most know that the vast majority of the laity support it."

You're indeed confused and prove the Cardinal's point, the Vatican doesn't "oppose" women ordinations, it recognizes that it has no authority to ordain women. Perhaps its time to recognize your power hungry madness for what it is and repent.

Cardinal George smokescreen.

Cardinal George smokescreen. The good cardinal might remember that when he points a finger at someone else accusing them of "scandal and confusion" he has three fingers pointing back to himself. Nothing has caused more scandal and confusion than the sex abuse scandal that cardinal George presided over. Womens ordination is a drop in the bucket when compared to the harm done by this scandal.
Finally, cardinal George, we're not children, and we're intelligent enough to not be confused. This isn't the 18th century or earlier when the ignorant masses looked to the hierarch for advice.

I never ceased to be amazed

I never ceased to be amazed by the level of vitriol some of the writers express regarding the ordination of women in these blogs. One would think that the fear some of them manifest is worthy of time with a competent therapist. Have no fear you who are opposed to the ordination of women, the sign of the times is quite evident, the ordinations of men to priesthood has continued to decline for decades now, not just in the USA but around the globe. When there are no priests to celebrate Eucharist then we will continue to violate the very essence of the sacrament by distributing pre-consecrated hosts in a para-liturgical service.....one important note......that will not be a Eucharistic celebration! Imagine losing the Eucharistic celebration just because of celibacy! Maybe we can have drive thru Churches, simply order the required number of hosts desired and drive away, no need to meet as a community just take, eat and drive on.

The Pope has forbidden God to

The Pope has forbidden God to love women. The Pope has forbidden God to love married priests. The Pope has championed Bishops who protect pedophile priests and sexually active homosexual priests. The Vatican has paid billions in hush money to victims of clergy abuse. But, in the name of God, the Pope has ended all discussion of women priests and married men in the priesthood. We are asked to believe the Pope claims that God doesn't love women and married men as much as the Pope loves pedophiles, as this is infallible doctrine that can never be questioned.

Only Jewish believers are allowed to question God and their rabbis. Catholics are never allowed to question the Pope who talks to God and forbids God to love women and married men,... or children....

There can be no "dialogue" on

There can be no "dialogue" on matters of doctrine, which is what the Church's 2,000-year-old teaching that the priesthood, since the first priests were installed by Jesus Christ is open to men alone, constitutes. The Church is not a democracy (and neither is the United States, for that matter). There can be no "opinions" regarding doctrine, only faithful Catholics in obedience to Church teaching or heretics. Choose one, not both. It would be beneficial if those prone to heresy would simply make it official and leave our Church physically (as they have already don spiritually) and join another whose views more closely match their own.

Not to allow discussion or

Not to allow discussion or dialogue on a topic or idea renders it even more of an issue. A married clergy or women's ordination will not ride off in the sunset or simply evaporate in thin air. The measure of any culture or society can be ascertained by it's treatment of women. Denying women an equal place at the altar seems more Christlike than anything I'm hearing from the opposition. There is sooooooooo much fear amongst those who oppose even the possibility of dialogue about such topics. What does it tell you about the character of any organization when people are not permitted to even speak about an issue? History has clearly demonstrated that those regimes perish with the development and evolution of humanity. For God's sake, we in the United States consider ourselves a very advanced and educated nation and consider how long it took us to give women the right to vote (cf. 19th Amendment, a mere 91 years ago).

Thank you again Sister

Thank you again Sister Maureen Fiedler for giving us another example of the confused hierarchy in the Catholic Church. Many of the people who have defended our intelligent Sister Fiedler have said many of the ideas that I have been thinking when I read her article. Many of the bishops in the vatican and this country are really afraid of women who might be more truthful and intelligent than they are. I agree with those who indicated that the real scandal in the Catholic Church is the the way the Vatican and many of the conservative, republican catholic bishops in this country tried to keep the sexual scandal hidden from the laity. I pray to the Holy Spirit that he will awaken the Catholic Laity to the scandalous behavior of some of our church leaders.

Here is a part of the article

Here is a part of the article from Oct.17.11:

"The Vatican says women cannot be ordained priests because Jesus Christ willingly chose only men as his apostles.
Advocates of a female priesthood reject this position, saying Jesus was merely conforming to the social customs of his times."

Who is Jesus? Jesus is God and he knew the future - sorry but there was no any woman as His apostle.

Helloooo anon Junia

Helloooo anon Junia Foremost Apostle Among The Apostles WOMAN Romans, NT

Mary Magdala Apostle WOMAN Jesus chose her to reveal, teach His Resurrection.

Samarian well woman John4 Jesus told the returning men she was a better apostle to Samaria than they were. He was so thrilled with her he had no need of the food they had gone to procur.

WOMEN Apostles... yep, you just gotta get to actually read the bible.
Anonymous, your claims there were no women apostles just show complete ignorance of the bible and what Jesus did and said.

Lots of women were Jesus's highly significant, highly praised apostles.

Only WOMEN anointed our Messiah, again with his praise and defence.
Mary Bethany, at which no one complained, and another time, woman of the city, at which Jesus defended her to all present at that communion meal.
Women placed in the role of Bishop, anointers, by Jesus.

Post new comment

NCR Comment code:

  1. Be respectful. Do not attack the writer. Take on the idea, not the messenger.
  2. Use appropriate language. Avoid vulgarities and slurs.
  3. Keep to the point. Deliberate digressions don't aid the discussion.

For more detailed guidelines, visit our User Guidelines page.

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
(if you have one; if not, leave this blank)
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <font> <swf> <swf list>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You may use <swf file="song.mp3"> to display Flash files inline

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This is to prove you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.