A new Catholic horizon

Printer-friendly versionPrinter-friendly versionSend to friendSend to friendPDF versionPDF version
10302009p22pha.jpg

THE FUTURE CHURCH: HOW TEN TRENDS ARE REVOLUTIONIZING THE CATHOLIC CHURCH
By John L. Allen Jr.
Published by Doubleday, $28

Perceptive, evenhanded, thought-provoking, horizon-expanding, remarkably well informed--words like these popped into my head as a read John L. Allen Jr.’s new book, The Future Church: How Ten Trends Are Revolutionizing the Catholic Church. I thought I detected in his introduction a note of apology for writing as “a journalist, not a priest, theologian or academic.” His credentials, as NCR readers know, are just fine. If you had doubts, the book will dispel them.

---------------------------------------

To read an except from The Future Church by John L. Allen Jr. click here.

Join Allen in discussing his book on his blog The Future Church.

---------------------------------------

The title tantalizes by promising more than anybody can deliver. Allen has too much sense to try to deliver it. He provides no blueprint for the future, no church design. He does just the opposite.

Preschoolers Amanda Keheller and Jack Ignowski, with help from teacher Michelle O’Gara, search for worms in a soil sample at St. Monica Academy in Chicago in 2008. Ecology is one of the 10 trends revolutionizing the Catholic church, according to a new book by John L. Allen Jr. (CNS/Catholic New World/Karen CallawayPreschoolers Amanda Keheller and Jack Ignowski, with help from teacher Michelle O’Gara, search for worms in a soil sample at St. Monica Academy in Chicago in 2008. Ecology is one of the 10 trends revolutionizing the Catholic church, according to a new book by John L. Allen Jr. (CNS/Catholic New World/Karen CallawayHis analysis of the trends makes two things clear. First, we are on the brink of changes that, taken together, will radically reshape the church. “Revolutionize” is Allen’s word. Second, the trends will pursue their own course, interacting with one another and with culture at large in ways that make it impossible to say what the final results of the revolution will be. How radical a revolution? It’s anybody’s guess, I suppose. The trends present challenges whose novelty and magnitude make the heart skip a beat. They in their cumulative import -- I speak as a historian -- portend shifts in Catholic patterns without parallel in the past. Allen lays them out evenhandedly and, as he says, descriptively, not prescriptively. By that he means he does not present the trends as either good or bad for the church. He presents them simply as the way things are moving.

The trends are of course not unrelated to one another. “World-Church,” not surprisingly the first Allen deals with, is closely related to “The New Demography,” to “Multipolarism,” and to “Globalization.”

By midcentury, Nigeria, Uganda and the Democratic Republic of the Congo will be among the 10 largest Catholic nations in the world, displacing from the list Poland and Spain. But this newly world church, a result, in part, of the demographic shift, is affected by globalization. It shoves into prominence cultural values and priorities different from those of the North Atlantic world that still frame our Catholic sensibilities, which raises the multipolar issue. One trend tempers or intensifies another, as does globalization with affirmation of indigenous values and priorities.

Some of the nearly 3,000 Muslims from around the United States gathered outside the U.S. Capitol Sept. 25 are seen participating in “jummah,” a congregational prayer held on Fridays. (CNS/Daniel Sone)Some of the nearly 3,000 Muslims from around the United States gathered outside the U.S. Capitol Sept. 25 are seen participating in “jummah,” a congregational prayer held on Fridays. (CNS/Daniel Sone)“Evangelical Catholicism” and “Pentecostalism” are also closely related, and they to some extent tie in to “Islam.” These three together make the future look more conservative on sexual and gender issues. But then there is the “Biotech Revolution,” which, along with other developments in the scientific world such as “the expanding universe,” challenges fundamental principles of Catholic teaching as we have known them. Besides human cloning, embryonic stem cell research and related issues we often hear about, the biotech revolution drills deep into the foundations of religion itself when it thinks it’s discovered a God gene. In comparison, the “Ecology” trend might seem tame, but, as Allen shows, it too overturns established patterns of thinking, behaving and theologizing.

Readers may be surprised to find “Expanding Lay Roles” among the trends, which raises the question of how a trend makes it to the top 10. Allen developed six criteria: A trend must be global, have impact at the grass roots, involve official leadership, have potential to explain a variety of factors, contain predictive power and not be ideologically driven. These criteria allowed Allen to eliminate some usual suspects, such as the sexual abuse crisis, John Paul II and women. The chapter on “Trends That Aren’t,” short though it is, will engage you as much as the others.

For the trends that are, Allen divides each of the 10 chapters into two sections. The first, “What’s Happening,” does what it promises. It presents and analyzes information. These sections are, for me, the most satisfying and impressive in the book. Allen has done his homework. He propels the reader into a crash course about what’s happening not only in the church but in economics, diplomacy, global politics and similar matters. I’m not sure how experts in those fields will judge Allen’s analysis. All I can say is that I learned a lot and I think you will too.

The second section, “What It Means,” speculates on consequences of the trends in descending order of certainty -- from near certain, to probable, to possible, to long shot. The subjunctive mood dominates this section. “Could be” and “might be” appear often, along with fellow travelers like “maybe” and “conceivably.” The demographic trends might seem solid, but such trends have reversed themselves in the past. A pandemic or two could do the same in the future.

An embryologist removes frozen embryos from a storage tank at the Smotrich IVF Clinic in La Jolla, Calif., in this 2007 file photo. (CNS/Sandy Huffaker)An embryologist removes frozen embryos from a storage tank at the Smotrich IVF Clinic in La Jolla, Calif., in this 2007 file photo. (CNS/Sandy Huffaker)The subjunctive diet can get tedious. It makes clear, however, that forces are at play out there in utterly unpredictable ways. They are truly big forces, with an erratic charge at their core. Jokers and wild cards abound in this game. Maybe the trends are not, after all, going to generate the ecclesial equivalent of the Big Bang, but they just might come close.

The book validated what I believe is the most lasting significance of the Second Vatican Council (1962-65). In its largest scope the council tried to make the church face the world as it is and then deal with it as it is. It tried to dispel nostalgia for the medieval “ages of faith,” for the perfect world order that prevailed before the French Revolution, and for other historical illusions.

The church decided to face the facts of the “modern world,” which included cultural and religious pluralism and all the conundrums that modern science thrust upon us regarding our origins, our survival, and our well-being.

Facing the facts is precisely what Allen is asking the church -- asking us -- to do.

The book also confirms a basic truth about the historical trajectory of the church: What happens outside the church is more important for it than what happens inside it. Church reforms such as the Investiture Controversy in the 11th century, the Council of Trent in the 16th, and Vatican II in the 20th were changes introduced into church life and practice by leaders in the church and made operative by them. Such changes, important though they were, can seem almost insignificant in comparison with the impact of things like Constantine’s recognition of the church in the fourth century or something as mundane in the 19th as the invention of the telephone.

The Future Church is not casual bedtime reading. Its message requires an alert mind, ready to digest information and grasp complexities. Allen believes, and I do too, that the impact of the trends, whatever that might concretely turn out to be, requires a new kind of courage on our part. It requires courage “to think beyond the interests of one’s own Catholic tribe,” the courage to rise to a new Catholic horizon, which is also Catholic. Reading the book is itself a first step.

Jesuit Fr. John W. O’Malley, a church historian, is professor of theology at Georgetown University in Washington. His latest books are What Happened at Vatican II (Harvard) and A History of the Popes (Sheed and Ward).

Section: 
I. Book Reviews

There is no one with his ears

There is no one with his ears to the ground and his eyes so resolutely trained on the horizon like John Allen. A review like this from Fr John O'Malley, who is as astute about history as John Allen is about the present makes this a must read for me.

I was at a talk by Robert Imbelli of Boston College, arranged by the unsinkable Ken Woodward on 9 November in Briarcliff Manor, New York. Bob's talk was on the four key issues in Benedict's theological vision. Ken's title was: "Benedict XVI: What's He Up To?" Imbelli cited John Allen at a crucial point. Ken's eyebrows arched then and up several other points, signalling to me the skepticism of one of the most acute and important members of the Catholic intelligentsia in this country about Benedict. I'm no defender of everything Benedictine these days, but what Imbelli's talk came down to was Benedict's insistence that Christ is the Center and there is no church without Christ; the church is not just a sociological body.

How does one square that with Catholic patriarchal traditions and their aftermath on the one hand, and with official views on sexual identity, on the other -- if one is convinced the tradition needs to grow? For many Catholics, conservatism on those issues drives them into a frenzy not unlike Bush derangement syndrome on the Left from 2000 through 2008 and Obama derangement syndrome on the Right today. But it remains a fact that what is seen as a question of giving justice to women and homosexuals on the one side is seen as a violation of fundamental Biblical teaching on the other side.

I suspect that a thorough reading of John's book by Americans, many of whom sometimes forget we are only six percent of the world's Catholics, will make us aware of just how much plurality there is in the church -- and perhaps how the two issues I raise above seem so little important in much of the global South. More importantly, I suspect John's book will help us realize that Benedict is a canny leader of the world church, attempting --albeitly imperfectly and sometime with incredible clumsiness and insensitivity-- to draw us to the Center.

The question for me is whether the Christic Center will be recognized as our living Center ... or will the centripetal forces of convictions moving outwards make that Benedictine goal impossible.

I agree, Bill, that cooler

I agree, Bill, that cooler heads - on both "sides" of the extreme - need to prevail as the Church stumbles through these difficult times. But I disagree that Pope Benedict XVI is attempting to "draw us to the center." A review of his pontificate thus far shows that he is pulling as much of the Church as he can to the far right, and if it means trampling on Vatican II, his predecessor John Paul II, the laity, women religious in the US, homosexuals in the seminaries and priesthood, and so on, then so be it. He invites back into the Church those excommunicated previously by JP II for their refusal to acknowledge the reforms of Vatican II, ultraconservative reactionary Anglicans, and other fanatic fringe groups that function as if they were time-warped from the 16th century to the present. And all the while, he refuses any discussion with other less reactionary center and left of center groups. So what "center" could you be referring to? His "insistence," as you call it, is not really about being Christ-centered (what Catholic of any stripe would dispute that?), but it has everything to do with being Ratzinger-centered. And if some Christians are bound to "fundamental Biblical teaching," they best not be Catholics, since the Church has decreed that the Bible is not to be taken literally. This, too, is something Ratzinger/Benedict has seem to have "forgotten." So for me, the hope is that the expanding forces of convictions in the thoughtful, Spirit-centered renewal of the Church will indeed thwart Pope Benedict's goals for us.

Are we talking here a

Are we talking here a evolving Suprareligion of which the pope will over see? Sort of a one world religion? Jesus said that He was the way, the truth, and the life and that no one comes to the Father except through Him. Was Jesus narrow minded? He also said that narrow is the way that leads to life and broad is the way that leads to destruction and few there be that find it.

The interpretation of "No one

The interpretation of "No one comes to the Father except through HIm" is narrowly, indeed very narrowly interpreted by both Catholic and Fundamentalist churches. The greatest commandment of God is loving God and loving others as we love ourselves and ----that is----- the lens by which we see "....coming to the Father", and not an exclusionary take that the far right war mongering church attendants wish others to see.

It is never the easy and frankly lazy thinking of us vs, them that lies at the heart of Jesus' message. It is an inclusive, welcoming beckoning to follow his example in how we regard others, christian or otherwise.

"Judge not lest ye be judged" ought to ring some bells here.

0John Allen has his ear to

0John Allen has his ear to the ground on the changing church of today, but no one can assess what the future will be, and it takes more than the historical sense of Father O'Malley to make a reasonable assessment. This assessment overlooks the seeds laid by Vatican II, which have not yet been hammered into policies, and historical figures who have not yet arrived on the scene. In this country, the organs of communication are in the hands of those who lean to the right or to the left, the broad middle is simply content to work quietly and effectively in ways that do not make headlines. This broad middle is "doctrinally traditional, socially liberal, theologically progressive, eminently pastoral - and highly critical". They will create the future in ways that simply cannot be envisioned. I sense a pessimism in this book and in these assessments, a pessimism drawn chiefly from reservations about the Vatican or the bishops. Some who will shape and determine this future are already on the scene, and others will arrive in due time. This book is a fair journalistic assessment based upon the forces operative in the Church at the present time, but journalism is not and never has been the thermostat of what is really happening at present or what the future will be.

Father Clifford Stevens
Boys Town, Nebraska

Oh, Father Clifford

Oh, Father Clifford Stevens!
As a journalist I wonder which is the profession that can claim to be the thermostat of what is really happening at present or what the future will be.
To be fair, sometimes a journalist has worked out precisely that. Perhaps Alvin Toffler. It is so dark to write the words "is not and never has been"!
My job is to try to break, daily, your condemnation to our capacities.
Nicolas Luco
Santiago, Chile

Nichaolas Luco - I have the

Nichaolas Luco - I have the greatest respect for journalists since I am a bit of a journalist myself and I certainly want a free press,in the church and in society as a whole. I was not disparaging journalism or John Allen, for whom I have the greatest respect. He is a careful, superb, fair, well-informed and even witty journalist. My point was that there is a broad middle ground that is not in the spotlight, not interested in headlines, and bringing about changes in their own territory that will mightily affect the future.
Who could have predicted a Pope John XXIII or even a John Henry Newman? I am not so sure Alvin Toffler was that prophetic, I would say that Josef Pieper was more of a prophet, but in ways that do not make headlines. I am convinced that the future is not influenced by "trends" but by persons and most of the persons who will shape the future are simply not on the journalists horizon.

Father Clifford Stevens

This is just a lot of

This is just a lot of baloney! The large majority of Catholics have departed already and embraced the world. You only have to read the bulk of posts here to see that is true. The Church will continue to shrink but as Christ told Peter, the gates of hell shall not prevail against it. And as St Thomas Aquinas says fully half of humanity falls into the pit of hell. Modern man will reap the evil he sows.

Nicholas Luco - I have the

Nicholas Luco - I have the greatest respect and admiration for journalism, since I am a bit of a journalist myself, but journalism is not the thermostat of the future, since the future is dependent upon human beings, and human behavior is unpredictable. I also have huge respect for John Allen and he is a superb reporter, honest, objective, insightful and even witty. But the future of the Catholic Church is not dependent upon "trends", but upon individuals, in particular those who break the mold. Who could have foreseen the election of Pope John XXIII, or a Newman, or a Leo XIII. There are forces at work that are simply not discernible at this time, and what factors or persons will create the future cannot be predicted. The 2nd Vatican Council created "theological journalism", which is more than just reporting facts, it is judging those facts in the light of theology. I see little of that kind of journalism around today; instead Catholic journalism has broken up into factions, right and left, and perhaps several other categories. I have little hope in that kind of journalism, and I will state that John Allen is not that kind of a journalist. My point was that the broad middle ground has not been heard from, since it is too busy fashioning a future in its own home territory.

Father Clifford Stevens
Boys Town, Nebraska

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <font> <swf> <swf list>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You may use <swf file="song.mp3"> to display Flash files inline

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This is prove you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions. Solve the simple math problem.
1 + 1 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.