Twitter - Facebook - Email Alerts - RSS
Vatican, traditionalists name dialogue questions
VATICAN CITY -- In an atmosphere described as "cordial, respectful and constructive," Vatican officials opened a dialogue with representatives of the traditionalist Society of St. Pius X and scheduled twice-a-month meetings over the coming months.
In a statement issued after the first meeting at the Vatican Oct. 26, the Pontifical Commission "Ecclesia Dei" said the process would focus on key doctrinal issues arising from the teachings of the Second Vatican Council.
"The questions due to be examined concern the concept of tradition, the Missal of Paul VI (the post-Vatican II Roman Missal), the interpretation of Vatican Council II in continuity with Catholic doctrinal tradition, the themes of the unity of the church and the Catholic principles of ecumenism, the relationship between Christianity and non-Christian religions, and religious freedom," the statement said.
Jesuit Fr. Federico Lombardi, Vatican spokesman, said the meeting lasted about three hours and dealt primarily with setting an agenda and a schedule for the talks.
While he gave no idea how long the process would take, Lombardi said semimonthly meetings represented a "rather intense rhythm" and a serious attempt to heal two decades of separation between the traditionalists and the rest of the church.
In July Pope Benedict XVI placed the pontifical commission under the authority of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith and said the commission would be responsible for talks aimed at restoring "full communion" with members of the Society of St. Pius X, founded by the late Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre.
Lombardi said the meeting Oct. 26 "marked a new phase in the relationship" between the society and the Vatican and he said that the dialogue was possible "thanks to the fact that the excommunications were lifted."
In January, Pope Benedict lifted the excommunications of four bishop members of the society, who were ordained against papal orders in 1988, and said he hoped the move would open the way for a serious dialogue about doctrinal differences between the church and the traditionalist group.
The pope later said that full communion for the group's members would depend on "true recognition of the magisterium and the authority of the pope and of the Second Vatican Council."
Lombardi said the commission's positive description of the climate of the meeting meant there was "a sense of trust that accompanied this meeting and its prospects."
"Finally, doctrinal questions are beginning to be discussed by competent people, representatives who are authorized by the two sides," Lombardi said.
The head of the Society of St. Pius X, Bishop Bernard Fellay, who was not at the Vatican for the meeting, repeatedly has said he and the other members of the society have serious concerns about the way the teachings of the Second Vatican Council have been interpreted and implemented, particularly the teachings regarding religious liberty, ecumenism, liturgy and relations with other religions.
The delegation of the Society of St. Pius X was led by Argentine Bishop Alphonso de Galarreta, who was one of the four bishops originally excommunicated by Pope John Paul II. Lombardi said Bishop de Galaretta and the other representatives of the society lodged in the Domus Santa Marta, a hostel inside the Vatican, which houses cardinals during a papal conclave.
Religion News Service Adds:
Vatican hosts talks with ultraconservative group
Francis X. Rocca, Religion News Service
VATICAN CITY -- Representatives of the Society of St. Pius X (SSPX) met at the Vatican on Monday (Oct. 26) for the first of a planned series of talks aimed at reconciling the breakaway ultra-traditionalist group with the Catholic Church.
No details of the discussions were released, but a Vatican statement said they took place “in a cordial, respectful and constructive climate.”
Founded by the late Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, the SSPX is the largest and most vocal group of ultra-traditionalist Catholics who reject the modernizing reforms ushered in by the Second Vatican Council (1962-65), including the council's teachings on religious freedom and subsequent changes to the Mass.
The talks that started Monday will be held over coming months, probably twice a month, according to the Vatican, and will focus on the “doctrinal differences still outstanding” between the SSPX and the Holy See, in areas that include liturgy, “ecumenism, the relationship between Christianity and non-Christian religions, and religious freedom.”
The meetings are the fruit of significant concessions by Pope Benedict XVI designed to bring the group back into the fold. Benedict lifted restrictions on the so-called Traditional Latin Mass in 2007, explicitly as an overture to the SSPX, then readmitted four excommunicated SSPX bishops earlier this year.
Jewish groups were outraged after one of the readmitted bishops, Richard Williamson, told Swedish television that no more than 300,000 Jews “perished in Nazi concentration camps ... not one of them by gassing in a gas chamber.” On Monday, a German judge ordered Williamson, who made the statement in Germany, to pay a fine that could rise as high as $18,000 (12,000 euro), depending on his income, for breaking the country's law against Holocaust denial. Williamson, whose lawyer told a reporter that he would probably fight the penalty, was given two weeks to file an appeal.
Another of the readmitted bishops, Alfonso de Galarreta, who is leading the SSPX delegation to the Vatican talks, recently told one of his group's publications that “we have several years of discussions ahead of us.”




Religious Liberty needs to be
Religious Liberty needs to be clarified in this way. Can a person stand before God and claim religious liberty in the objective sense, i.e., before God? The answer is no since no one has a right to embrace falsehood before God and all of the religions save Catholicism contain some error.
Each person must seek the truth which is Christ. Error may never be embraced in the objective sense, i.e., before God. However, a person will not be held accountable before God for embracing error if he does so in good conscience. So religious liberty is only valid in the subjective sense.
This is similar to the moral law & sin. All humans must follow God's moral law in their life. However if in good conscience they believe that something is not wrong, i.e., does not violate the moral law, then they do not sin when committing that act. A good example is contraception. This is against God's moral law, like it or not. But if a married couple in good conscience believe it is not wrong, they do not sin when using it.
Humans must seek the Truth which is Christ and they must follow God's moral law. If in good conscience they do not find the complete Truth or clearly see all the precepts of the moral law, they will not be held to account.
This dialogue is largely
This dialogue is largely "theatre of the absurd" staged for the reactionary thinkers who have held the power since the far right papacy of John Paul II began in 1978. It only worsened with the "election" of Benedict as Bishop of Rome. It's hard to see how this will advance the teachings of the Second Vatican Council because Benedict has continued the program instituted by his predecessor to unravel all of the teachings and benefits of the Council. The foxes: (Pope, College of Cardinals, archbishops and bishops), are the ones who are guarding the hen house. Yes, there are a few exceptions in this group, a few who still believe in the teachings and spirit of the Council, but they are in such a small minority that there will be very little or no impact. The decks have been stacked against any progressive thinkers like the ones that emerged during Vatican II. The far right elements have largely controlled the discussion for the last three decades and for many centuries prior to the Second Vatican Council. The shills of these reactionary elements are fighting a losing battle with the hearts and minds of the vast majority of Catholics both pre and post Vatican Council II. They know the imperial Roman model is in a final stage of decay but they will fight for their narrow views until the present structure implodes. It will happen sooner than most think. This dialogue with the SSPX wing nuts should surprise no one. Benedict will come down on their side because he has very similar views. Pathetic situation that it is, it will only advance the decay and usher in a new Church.
why is the Church negotiating
why is the Church negotiating with a group of formerly excommunicated anti-vatican II rebels who want nothing but to turn the clock back to pre-vatican II rules and traditions?.
follow the money
follow the money
Precisely. For the same
Precisely. For the same reason it likes Old Order Knighthoods.
Post new comment