The Independent News Source
NCR on Kindle - NCR classifieds - YouTube - Twitter - Facebook - Email Alerts - RSS
PDF versionBenedict, Obama meeting marked by clarity, respect
Pope sets aside politics, favoring education, persuasion
Jul. 10, 2009
CNS photo
The meeting of the Holy Father with President Barack Obama has come and gone, and the Apostolic Palace is still standing. To be sure, the pope and the president were far from being on the same page on every subject. What two heads of state are? The Holy Father teaches that abortion is an intrinsically evil act that should never be permitted. President Obama sees abortion as a tragedy in every instance, which the law should seek to limit but not prohibit.
On this topic and a few others, they evidently agreed to disagree, not in polemical anger, but in a clear understanding that such issues are difficult ones in a pluralistic society, in which well-meaning people, “exercising the right to abide by one’s own conscience,” in the words of the post-meeting Vatican press release, might have different moral solutions to the same problem.
The remarks of Cardinal Georges Cottier, Dominican theologian emeritus of the papal household, published early last week, in which the Cardinal praised the president’s position in seeking a common ground “to reduce the number of women seeking abortion,” were an obvious Vatican-planned prelude to this result.
But the sensitivity of these topics was not a bar to the pope and the president’s agreement on so many other issues. At the start of the week of their meeting, Pope Benedict issued his third encyclical, Caritas in Veritate.
This encyclical is a clarion call “to manage the global economy; to revive economies hit by the crisis; to avoid any deterioration of the present crisis and the greater imbalances that would result; to bring about integral and timely disarmament, food security and peace; to guarantee the protection of the environment and to regulate migration....” (§ 67)
If he been a credentialed reporter to the G8 sessions in L’Aquila, the pope could not have better described the positions that President Obama took at the G8 meetings. On these vital issues, the two world leaders are very much in sync. If anything, on these issues, the pope may even lean to the left of the president.
What is going on here? The pope welcomes to the Apostolic Palace a political leader whom some of his priests have characterized as an “abortionist” or worse, they talk seriously about this and other issues, they agree that they can work together for the benefit of mankind, they exchange gifts and they part, with the pontiff saying, “I thank you for all your work! I’ll pray for you!”
NCR: February 3-16, 2012
Subscribe to NCR to get all the news and special features that aren't always available online. In this issue:
- US News: Bishops Host Conference on Immigration
Conference fields advocates' questions on law, policy
- Special Section: Deacons. Serving as parish administrator; roles of wives; and more
- Study: Black Catholics are more engaged
New study by Notre Dame researcher about parish involvement in America
According to the Catholic neo-cons, it was not supposed to happen this way, if it was supposed to happen at all.
Actually, this result was well-telegraphed in advance to anyone paying attention. I have already mentioned Cardinal Cottier’s conciliatory remarks, but there were other indications as well. The fact that the audience was scheduled at 4 p.m. to fit the president’s schedule is more important than one may realize. Not only are such afternoon audiences against papal protocol, nobody does anything serious in Rome in July after 1 pm. It is too hot. Both sides really wanted this meeting.
And there were the other well-marked indicators before this: the even-handed approach of L'Osservatore Romano, with its flattering coverage of the election results and its balanced evaluation of Obama’s first 100 days in office; the pope’s congratulatory telegram to the president immediately upon his election and not, as is customary, on his swearing-in months later.
And then there is that language in Chapter 9 of Caritas in Veritate that the neo-cons and other creators of wedge issues wish was not there: “The Church does not have technical solutions to offer and does not claim ‘to interfere in any way in the politics of States.’” The interior quote is from Paul VI’s Populorum Progressio. These words of the encyclical were singled out by Cardinal Paul Josef Cordes at the press conference on July 7 launching Caritas in Veritate.
In explaining the pope’s thought, Cardinal Cordes said, “The Church is not a political party, nor is it an actor in the political process. Woe to those who reduce the mission of the Church to a worldly pressure group seeking political results.”
The pope, perhaps unlike some other members of the cloth, does not want to play politics. He wants to educate hearts and minds. He wants to bring people, freely and on their own, to faith in the entire Christian message.
He even gave the president some homework to do. He wants him to read Dignitatis Personae, the recent Vatican document on bioethics. And I bet that the president will read it, so that the next time that pontiff and president meet, their mutually respectful conversation can continue. We should all go and do likewise.
Nicholas P. Cafardi is a civil and canon lawyer, and a professor and former dean at Duquesne University School of Law in Pittsburgh.
“The Church is not a
“The Church is not a political party, nor is it an actor in the political process. Woe to those who reduce the mission of the Church to a worldly pressure group seeking political results.”
**EDIT THE ABOVE WITH RED PEN**
HA! What deaf ears Cardinal Cordes' words will fall on considering the sizeable and influential US media industry that styles itself "Catholic" (501c3) and is dedicated precisely to "seeking political results" through a laserlike focus on the single issue of abortion. Some go so far as to proclaim with certainty that it is a "mortal sin" not to vote in accordance with their instructions. Obviously this sickening level of corruption that has crept into the American church over the past few decades is of great concern to the Vatican or we would not be seeing statements like the one above. Unfortunately the very people it's aimed at would not recognize themselves in a mirror. Raymond Arroyo, are you listening? Fr. Frank? Drew Mariani? Al Kresta? Deal Hudson? Just to name a very very few. Ring any bells with you guys? Naw, I thought not. Time to reach for the Red Pen.
American Presidents and their
American Presidents and their families have always respected protocol, it good to see that President Obama and his family continue the noble tradition. Unlike the Irish Head of State Mary Robinson who acted like an ignoramus a few years ago...
Snowdrop, it was wonderful to
Snowdrop, it was wonderful to see President and Mrs. Obama respect protocol. Unfortunately, Hillary Clinton did not respect protocol when she was first lady. The Obama's do have more class than the Clinton's.
And for those American RC
And for those American RC Churches and vocal neo-con USCCB members who CHOOSE to openly endorse political parties and candidates as actors in the political process, you should also be ready to surrender your tax-exempt status with the IRS. Just because the Diocese of Bridgeport dodged a bullet in Connecticut does not mean that the legal challenges will not continue.
“The Holy Father teaches that
“The Holy Father teaches that abortion is an intrinsically evil act that should never be permitted. President Obama sees abortion as a tragedy in every instance, which the law should seek to limit but not prohibit.
On this topic and a few others, they evidently agreed to disagree, not in polemical anger, but in a clear understanding that such issues are difficult ones in a pluralistic society, in which well-meaning people, “exercising the right to abide by one’s own conscience,” in the words of the post-meeting Vatican press release, might have different moral solutions to the same problem.”
This meeting is a perfect example of the problem. I speak as a laywoman, so I’ll give this my best try. Death comes in many forms. Who lives and who dies, when, and for what reason has been the perennial issue of the human condition for eons. The best that the sciences can offer and the best reasoning power of philosophy’s repertoire may bring many answers and a scientific-philosophical precision to at least narrow the gap between the papal and presidential agreement to disagree. This knowledge asset can also enhance one’s exercising the right to abide by one’s own conscience, because our functioning conscience may be vastly improved through knowledge. In a far, far, far from perfect world, often times it seems that the best we can do is to respect the adage: the perfect is the enemy of the good. But if we try harder to embrace the good, we may move closer to something called “the perfect.”
Dear Snowdrop What did Irish
Dear Snowdrop What did Irish PM Mary Robinson do that you wrote she was an ignoramus.... I am not familiar with her, what she did that annoyed you .
from the ray of sunshine, Sunray.
Uh oh, the pope providing a
Uh oh, the pope providing a booklet about science to Obama??? Hmmm. The pope is hardly coming from a papal position of accuracy and truth on the topic of science.
Hmmm, serious moral problems and theological problems abound regarding the pope too! Benedict XVI issued the directives to the bishops and priests to stall, silence, ignore the victims of the pedophile priests and bishops, to cover-up the sex crimes and to move the offending pedophile priests from parish to parish. He put Law and Levada in the Vatican and has still not laicized pedophile priests, pedophile bishops and the enabling bishops, archbishops who allowed the crimes to continue.
The darkness of the Vatican must come to light. The light of Jesus must shine.
"On this topic and a few
"On this topic and a few others, they evidently agreed to disagree, not in polemical anger, but in a clear understanding that such issues are difficult ones in a pluralistic society, in which well meaning people 'exercising the right to abide by one's own conscience',in the words of the post meeting Vatican press release, MIGHT HAVE DIFFERENT MORAL SOLUTIONS TO THE SAME PROBLEM.
Pope Bendict does not believe that Respect for the Sacredness and Dignity of every Human Life is a problem nor does he consider abortion to be a moral solution.
Can you explain how you came to the conclusion that Pope Benedict believes that abortion could be a moral solution to any problem after you have already stated that Pope Benedict teaches that abortion is an intrinsically evil act that should never be permitted?
Post new comment