NCR on Kindle - NCR classifieds - YouTube - Twitter - Facebook - Email Alerts - RSS
Eucharistic adoration: peaceful, despite the squabble
These days, some things may still be impossible to find online, but adoration chapels are not among them. Go to www.therealpresence.org, pick out your state on the big map and click. Up will pop a list of churches that expose the consecrated host for adoration, along with hours of operation and contact numbers.
Regardless of the city, the list should be striking for its length.
In the metro Phoenix area, where I live, no fewer than 45 churches make some kind of arrangements for adoration. Of these, eight have perpetual adoration chapels, and quite a few others have chapels that stay open limited hours, but which were built -- and appointed quite lavishly -- for the purpose.
In the developing world, adoration seems to be even more of a crowd-pleaser. According to a news item that ran last June through Catholic Exchange, the flood of worshipers who adore the Blessed Sacrament at Uganda's Holy Trinity monastery has prompted Aid to the Church in Need to endow the tiny community with $7,000 -- enough to support 12 additional professed nuns and one novice. Nuns credit the practice of adoration with reconciling feuding neighbors and spouses.
But here, apparently, is the rub. Perhaps because of its appeal to the less literate, or because of its association with the highly regulated life of contemplative orders, eucharistic adoration enjoys the reputation in some circles of an embarrassing throwback to some best-forgotten dark age. In a column posted to NCRonline.org Sept 8, Fr. Richard McBrien calls it "a doctrinal, theological, and spiritual step backward."
Having entered the church at Easter in 2008, I'm lucky to be unburdened with any such prejudice. I enjoy adoring the host and find it spiritually enriching. Being somewhat monkey-minded -- to steal a friend's wonderful expression for a style of thinking that lacks focus but not force -- I find sitting or kneeling before the Blessed Sacrament a powerful incentive to shut down and shut up.
Though it's a battle I sometimes lose, the brilliance of the monstrance and the whiteness of the host itself beguile me, more often than not, into a mood of pure reverence. For a South Park fan, this is a rare and wonderful thing.
This trek toward serene communion is never a purely personal one -- quite the opposite. In an adoration chapel, no one is ever alone, literally or figuratively. Whether kneeling in one of the prie-dieus or sitting in the pews, one becomes aware by the smallest signs -- a scraping foot off to the side, a muffled cough to the rear -- of being part of an ad hoc community, joined in purpose.
Preview NCR's Family Life Issue
Watch this video from NCR Editor Dennis Coday for highlights from our annual Family Life special section.

You won't find these articles on our website. Subscribe now to receive all the content from each biweekly issue.
On especially good days, when I enter the chapel with my brain buzzing less than usual, these small sensory cues, together with some other, more mysterious agent, bring me into a liminal space where the unity becomes one of spirit.
Adoration also has its more tangible benefits. Dark and cool by design and silent by convention, adoration chapels are some of the most profoundly still places to be found in any urban area. For overscheduled, over stimulated people who wish to extend their Communion experience beyond the single weekly Mass they can make, they can serve as vital spiritual oases.
Defending adoration from critics who condemn it on theological grounds is, frankly, beyond my abilities. Yet it seems to me that criticism of adoration, however it may be expressed, ultimately emerges from a fear quite common among Catholics whose lives in the Church have straddled the Second Vatican Council. That fear, boiled down, is that reversion to any antique practice will lay out a welcome mat for all manner of superstition and excess.
I sympathize. When it comes to ecumenism and the individual's right to exercise his or her own conscience, my knee jerks as quickly to protect the church's recent gains as anyone else's. But really, I wonder if the slope is quite that slippery. My generation took up swing dancing without re-fighting the zoot suit riots; I trust Catholics can adore the host without, say, forming the Fr. Coughlin Society.
The proof exists in my very own parish. Though fiercely liberal and generally low-church, it's also home to a chapter of Adore Ministries, an outreach group for young people, whose devotions include -- you guessed it -- eucharistic adoration.
These are the Millennials you've read about. They are by no means the Catholic Right's answer to Mao's Red Guards. They're into social justice. Some vote Democrat. They may adore the host, but they're sophisticated enough to know there's no danger in chewing it. They even precede their evenings of adoration with 45 minutes of Christian college rock.
The last might count as an aesthetic sin. But a little tackiness, judiciously applied, could keep the Vatican II spirit alive forever.
[Max Lindenman is a freelance writer based in Phoenix, Ariz. He entered the church in 2008, and covers Phoenix's Catholic beat for Examiner.com.]





Dear Max: With the exception
Dear Max:
With the exception of a few of the remarks you made toward the end, I really loved your article. As a "theologically backward" Gen-X-er, I hold spending more time before the King of Kings and the Source of All Grace as a necessary step in my quest to "put on Christ"(Romans, 13:14).
For additional thoughts on visits to the Blessed Sacrament, I recommend Father Michael Mueller's "The Blessed Eucharist".
In Christ,
Smooches
Dear Smooches, I, too, loved
Dear Smooches,
I, too, loved this article. I think Max has claimed Eucharistic Adoration as one of his effective prayer forms, as have many people. He has also articulated a very balanced view of how this prayer form is able to provide a meditative "space" for people who sometimes have a difficult time recognizing that they are always in the presence of God and his Son Jesus through the power of the Holy Spirit.
My problems with Eucharistic Adoration stems from the poor formation of those who often promote it. It is not the "most important thing you will ever do," as I heard one individual comment. It does not replace people receiving the Eucharist and becoming, what they literally are, a living monstrance [It is not uncommon for me to see people who have just received the Eucharist to then go right to the Eucharistic Adoration chapel forgetting they are in direct communion with Jesus - they kneel to adore that which they have just taken internally.] There is also a tendency among some who spend hours in Eucharistic Adoration to forget to see Jesus in others and to be Jesus for others. There are many who approach Jesus in the monstrance as though they are not God's beloved creation but a scaborous sinner who is insignificant in God's eyes [God would not have sent His Son to redeem a creation He considered insignificant]. These people have a tendency to promote Eucharistic Adoration as an obligatory step to avoiding the fires of hell and become so wrapped up in it that they fail to engage in Jesus' mission of discipleship.
If people find that Eucharistic Adoration brings them into a closer relationship with Jesus, then more power to them. I think the central issue here is balance. We cannot only spend time in Eucharistic Adoration. We are meant to also go out and bring Jesus to the world; being Christ for others and seeing Christ for others. Remember, we serve Christ best when we serve him in the person of our neighbor. That is not just my opinion, it is what Jesus told us to do.
These are very nice and
These are very nice and well-said comments.
A very kind and well-balanced
A very kind and well-balanced approach.
mh
An excellent explanation of
An excellent explanation of the beauty of Eucharistic Adoration, and its appeal for many people. The quiet, the reverence, the prayerful and peaceful attitude, all serve to quiet the senses. It is exactly what is needed in this time of constant sensory overload -- a time to turn off the TV, turn off the XM Radio, turn off the Blackberry, turn off the cell phone, turn off the iPod, and just *be* with the Lord.
It is amusing to me that in a day and age when many are touting the importance of meditation and quieting oneself, the Church has a means to do just that, and there are those who would condemn it.
I agree that Christan college rock is probably an aesthetic sin, but so is much of the music that purports to be liturgical music of the last couple of decades. Songs like "Gather Us In" and "Open Wide the Doors to Christ", "All Are Welcome" and "City of God", "Sing a New Church Into Being" and "What is This Place", not to mention nearly everything in that hideous hymnal "Glory and Praise" ("Like a Sunflower" -- YIKES!), constitute, I think, aesthetic sin, and since God is the very definition of Beauty, how that must horrify Him!
Finally, the "Spirit of Vatican II" alluded to by Mr. Lindenman is fading fast, praise God. It is being replaced by the authentic interpretation of Vatican II, as explained and articulated by Popes John Paul II and Benedict XVI, and by the Catechism of the Catholic Church.
Thanks for mentioning some of
Thanks for mentioning some of my favorite hymns. They echo deep into my soul.
I cannot understand your comment about the beautiful hymnal, Glory and Praise.
Those hymns have gladdened and encouraged so many hearts and souls. This world is richer for them.
Like A Sunflower Comes from
Like A Sunflower
Comes from the Young People's Glory & Praise.
Chorus:
Like a sunflower that follows every movement of the sun,
So I turn torward You to follow You, my God.
Vs. 1
In simplicity, charity, I follow
Vs. 2
In simplicity, honesty, I follow
Vs. 3
In simplicity, fidelity, I follow
And this is an "aestheic sin" that "horrifies God"? Clint, you might try following God, like a sunflower follows the sun, and practicing charity, as suggested in verse 1 of this hymn.
See also Song of Songs, Chapter 2, Verse 12
The flowers appear on the earth,
the time of singing has come,
and the voice of the turtledove
is heard in our land.
God Bless.
Hey Clint, Allow me to throw
Hey Clint,
Allow me to throw back at you the same line of reasoning that people of your ilk are so fond of using against Vatican II-minded Catholics:
SHOW ME WHERE VATICAN DOCUMENTS SAY THAT THESE SONGS ARE NOT CONSISTENT WITH A PRAYERFUL, LITURGICAL EXPRESSION OF PRAISE TO GOD! GIVE ME DOCUMENT NAMES AND PARAGRAPH NUMBERS! SINCE YOU ARE SUCH AN EXPERT ON THE (reform of the) REFORM, THIS SHOULD BE EASY FOR YOU.
Really, what is your deal? This article (which, by the way, I really appreciate even though I don't like or support Eucharistic adoration) isn't even about liturgical music. Quit using every single NCR article as an opportunity to grind your axe.
Very glad you posted this. I
Very glad you posted this. I work with lots of Millennials and am constantly amazed again at how Eucharistic adoration 'speaks' to them. In general, I find children and adults thirsting for an experience of meditative/contemplative prayer. To besmirch one form because it was practiced for centuries as old-fashioned just seems silly to me.
Great article!
Great article!
There is no theological
There is no theological "problem" with Adoration of the Blessed Sacrament"...it is a beautiful and acceptable PRIVATE devotion to which some folks are "legitimately" attracted. However my fear is that folks will come to consider Eucharistic Adoration as the REASON Jesus gave us the Eucharist. Jesus gave us the Eucharist to eat and drink...to become united with Him and with one another. He did not give it to us to adore. Adoration became popular when historical circumstances "took away" active participation of the laity in the celebration of the Paschal Mystery.
aidan, i believe you are
aidan,
i believe you are being sincere, but...
of all the COUNTLESS catholics i have met in the various parishes i've been at in my life accross this nation of ours (some would be considered very conservative by the posters here, others much more liberal) i have never ONCE met ANYONE who had the idea that Eucharistic adoration supplanted receiving the Body and Blood of Christ. Fr. McBrien's article was the first time I've ever heard such a thing. ever.
I SERIOUSLY doubt you will find someone who thinks Eucharistic adoration is a substitute for receiving our Lord in Communion. Ask around! I doubt you will find a single person either.
It would be like expecting people to demand the Rosary as a substitute for Holy Mass. You aren't going to find people like that. At least not anyone who is actually a Catholic. A non-catholic who in ignorance doesn't know what either one is would be your only situation, I'd bet.
You shoudn't worry, as your fear is unfounded. You would have a better chance of getting skin cancer, winning the lotto AND getting struck my a meteorite all at the same time.
"It would be like expecting
"It would be like expecting people to demand the Rosary as a substitute for Holy Mass."
"Back in the day" when I attended and served the Tridentine mass, it was not at all uncommon to find little old ladies (and, yes, men on occasion) praying their rosaries during the liturgy. These people did not "demand" the substitution of rosary for mass; they just did it!
Adoration and Benediction is
Adoration and Benediction is not a private devotion. First, there must always be more than one person there. Second, there is a liturgical book for the practice, thus making it official Church liturgy, thus by its very nature public worship.
01. Someone once sent me a
01. Someone once sent me a note regarding the US TV's famous Archbishop Fulton J Sheen. It's said that he made a promise to himself to pray an hour daily before the Eucharist. And he kept it religiously. Of course, the proof is in the pudding. The Bishop was profound in his words (when one silently listens, one receives solid stuff to speak about!)as well as his commitment to the millions in the mission lands all over the world. Christian adoration must lead to charity. Or else, it's all just clanging cymbals of which Paul spoke so voluminously. Sort of six water jars in the marriage of Cana. Standing there naked and empty and incapble of feasting the needy.
02. Also, Eucharist must not be dissociated from the Jewish Passover.
Passover is not a private warming up. It's a celebration of the "tribe" in us. Adoration thus is partially fine. However, the main focus of Eucharist is that it's a communitarian celebration of reconciliation, leveling of differences, social upbuilding and, again as Paul reminded, not eating and drinking my death! Narrow reading Eucharist as an adoration-piece is highly insulting
to the Lord.
03. I am writing this from the Orient, about 12000 miles away from Kansas, USA. I am afraid of the many who tend to elevate the Eucharist to the high altar, between 2 candles, the thurible and the buring incense. I have many "gods" about here, demanding incantations and litanies. They have eyes to see; but don't see. They have ears to hear, but don't care to hear. They don't see and hear the cries of the bleeding millions on the streets. what I need is a suffering, healing, and thus redeeming Jesus.
Max your column was heartfelt
Max your column was heartfelt and pastoral in response. Thank you
It ain't my thing - but it's
It ain't my thing - but it's an opportunity for prayer. Go for it.
Thank you, Max, for a good
Thank you, Max, for a good article. I like Fr. McBrien but really disagreed on his Adoration article. As Catholics we believe the Euchristic Bread IS Jesus, so how can you be wrong spending time with Him? Even the most "liberal" ( I hate that word) among us readily acknowledge the importance of spending time with God in prayer. What is so wrong about spending that time in His Eucharistic Presence? Almost everyone I know in the two parishes I frequent, who go to Adoration, are also involved in some kind of apostolic work including service to the poor and homeless. I think Fr Richard just missed it on this one.
"I think Fr Richard just
"I think Fr Richard just missed it on this one." -- Frank D.
"Fr Richard" never "misses it!" Fr. Richard teaches at Notre Dame University. Some who read his articles do not understand what he is trying to impart. It is these readers who have been taught years ago and by recent popes that they become holy by worshipping a piece of unleavened bread enshrined in a very expensive gold, silver, platinun, bejeweled environment. I do not recall any scriptural account of Jesus in word or action ever promoting anything like this devotion. It was just not his style. It still isn't.
Lighting a candle and making an intention to be in the presence of Jesus brings the same peace and communion with Jesus. Friends could gather in homes and call upon Jesus to be present. Expensive vestments, altar servers and all the other institutional trappings are not needed to fulfill Jesus' promise that "where two or three are gathered in my name, I am there among them." (Gospel of Matthew 18.20)
Associate; You know what
Associate;
You know what drives Domers crazy? When someone talks with assumed authority about the University of Notre Dame, and refers to it as Notre Dame University. Sorry, but true.
I've known McBrien for almost 30 years and enjoyed his classes and his writing. Admittedly he's always been a bit proud of himself and seems to have managed to become crankier as time goes on.
But I agree with Frank D. on this one and don't see this practice as leading us backward. This was kind of a wayward missile on McBrien's part and I was taken aback. I've tried the adoration stuff a couple of times, but it didn't take with me either. But, I freely admit that I'm just not very good at praying in any case. My wife loves it though, and she's definitely a progressive -- no harm, no foul in my book.
I guess, "Man who loves" that
I guess, "Man who loves" that this terrible practice of placing "University" after "Notre Dame" (no doubt the most 'mortal' of sins) originated when I attended and graduated from Loyola University. Humblest apologies!
I know Richard McBrien personally. When I served on a pastoral team in Michigan in the 70s, McBrien was our archdiocesan theologian. He was the first priest that I was aware of who cautioned members of the archdiocese about the poor psychological quality of many of those studying for priesthood in the nation's Catholic seminaries. He gave every indication that in the years to come, there would be much to deal with as those seminarians were ordained and placed in parish ministry. I have only the greatest respect and appreciation for McBrien's scholarship. I admire his courage to speak out especially in these times when the church so desperately needs an informed, honest voice.
"'Fr Richard' never 'misses
"'Fr Richard' never 'misses it!' Fr. Richard teaches at Notre Dame University."
Oh WELL, then. That settles it!
mh
The fear is that Jesus in the
The fear is that Jesus in the host is of greater value than Jesus in the person(s) by/around us and throughout the world. And, when did Jesus ever seek worship in the form of kneeling, bowing or prostration? He never once sent the disciples out into the world for that. He sent them out to teach, baptize, heal and care for the people of the world, Jew and non-Jew. Prayer and communion with God came in the desert, away from anything that might interfere with quiet comtemplation and conversation with God, not with "the brilliance of the monstrance and the whiteness of the host."
Did you ever think that
Did you ever think that someone might someone sitting in front of Jesus Himself in the Blessed Sacrament may hear God talking to his or her soul, asking the soul to get involved in helping others or evangelizing or a vocation. Why be against something that no one is forcing you to do. There are no Church precepts requiring private or public devotions.
*GASP*!!! Fr. McBrien must be
*GASP*!!!
Fr. McBrien must be horrified at the massive step backward these people are doing by adoring the Eucharist. I'm sure he's shocked that so many people would waste time adoring Jesus Christ, truly present in the Holy Sacrament.
"I'm lucky to be unburdened with any such prejudice."
- Good for him! Because that's exactly was Fr. Mcbrien's last serving of tripe was, prejudice.
Dear Pete, Your sarcasm is
Dear Pete,
Your sarcasm is totally unnecessary!
This is a welcome, welcome
This is a welcome, welcome article! We've got spiritual treasures in our church tradition -- Eucharistic Adoration, the rosary, the practices of novenas, litanies, Gregorian chant, etc., all of which are enjoyed by the right wing, anti women's ordination arm of the Church. These treasures belong to all Catholics, liberal and conservative -- let us use and enjoy them all.
YES! They are also enjoyed by
YES! They are also enjoyed by many in the left wing, anti-war, women for priests bunch. For the Love of God, literally, finding ourselves and our mission becomes clearer when we use our beautiful traditions and couple them with contemporary awareness. Present day Buddhists do this, as do Sufis, and Hindus. Why not Christians?
Well said.
Well said.
Regarding the way in which
Regarding the way in which Protestants regard adoration: In Pittsburgh, which is about to host the G-20 Summit, a Catholic lay group got the bishop's support to hold 40 Hours of Eucharistic adoration at the diocesan seminary, for anybody who wanted to pray for the work of the G-20. Local evangelical Protestants (normally considered the group most hostile to such particularly Catholic practices) were so inspired by this that they organized their own 40 Hour prayer vigil -- minus the adoration -- during the summit. This is not a case of competition. These evangelicals were genuinely moved by what the Catholics were doing, and wanted to borrow as much from it as they could. I think that the conversations over some of these spiritual practices shifted a long time ago, without anyone really noticing it.
Max: Thank you for your
Max: Thank you for your opinion piece. I agree there is a validity to Eucharistic Adoration. I am also aware of its need in many places. However, I also believe the Blessed Sacrament may be adored by Its Presence in the Tabernacle.
With the exposition of the Blessed Sacrament abuse is possible more so than it being the tabernacle....I think this option needs to have greater explanation
"I also believe the Blessed
"I also believe the Blessed Sacrament may be adored by Its Presence in the Tabernacle."
- very true. This is a good option for those who don't have the Eucharist exposed for adoration.
"With the exposition of the Blessed Sacrament abuse is possible more so than it being the tabernacle....I think this option needs to have greater explanation"
- a very understandable concern! At the two parishes that I have been at that offered it, the times available for Eucharistic adoration were a little odd. The reason was because they only scheduled it when there were enough people going to be there. Under NO circumstances should the Blessed Sacrament be left out in an empty, open church, and the places I've been take good care in this regard!
Amen, Max. It's often the
Amen, Max. It's often the only quiet, contemplative prayer time in people's lives. And no complicated system needed, no books. Just sit and be with Jesus. How wonderful
Meg Hogan
Personally, I appreciate a
Personally, I appreciate a church that offers various tools for people to get in touch with the Divine Presence in their lives. That may be contemplative prayer in the presence of one's own homes or quiet time in church in front of the Blessed Sacrament. We all have our personal preferences, which should be honored and respected - not any one being better than the other.
My own concern - and you may view me as a heretic for saying this - is that Adoration of the Blessed Sacrament (or participating in Communion for that matter) may end up setting limitations within our minds as to where God can be contacted. Let us not forget that God is omnipresence and as such is always present within our hearts.
So, whether we are in the quiet atmosphere of the Blessed Sacrament or sitting quietly on a park bench in Golden Gate Park, know that the presence of God is always with you - and in you.
Bob
Just so it doesn't get
Just so it doesn't get overlooked, I'd like to point out that there are many, many ways for people to have quiet, contemplative time in their lives without having to find a church or chapel with Ecushaisic Adoration, complicated systems or books of any kind. Just quiet your body and mind and open your heart to Jesus' presence with you at every moment and you can have all of the contemplative time you want.
How refreshing! To read that
How refreshing! To read that a new convert to the Faith can embrace both
Vatican II and Eucharistic Adoration in the same breath. Pope John XXIII
would highly approve.
Celebrating the Liturgy of
Celebrating the Liturgy of the Eucharist and adoration of the Eucharist are central to Catholicism. I see no problem with the adoration of the Eucharist in the morning - Monday through Friday. I have a problem with the adoration for twelve hours or fifteen hours or 24/7. We are a nation of hate-filled people who will find reasons to blame and strike out against their perceived demons. Whether we like it or not the USA is anti-Catholic. The Catholic hierarchy has been silent on many moral issues, such as universal health insurance for everyone and a decent salary for our workers. One priest in Grand Rapids, Michigan has written an article claiming that minimum is socialism. Our church wants more contributions for the CSA but the American wages buying power is that of mid-nineteen 70s.
I miss your logical
I miss your logical connection to longer periods of adoration leading to ignoring moral issues.
This is a wonderful article.
This is a wonderful article. My youngest daughter, who is 14, recently went on a Youth weekend with our church's youth group. The weekend included Eucharistic Adoration. I was skeptical that the teens would want to participate, but after their return, the teens all shared the joy,inner peace and renewed faith that they achieved from this experience. I think it is a wonderful tradition of our Church and at these difficult times, it is one we may all need.
Let me expose my own
Let me expose my own reservations about the reservation, exposition and adoration of the Eucharist. I believe I can honestly state that they are not fear based at all. Rather, they are based on my understanding that communion is a relational act, and not about the host alone (or even primarily). It is mutuality I understand God to seek relationships, not adoration. That is the scandal of the Gospel and the primary reason for the crucifixion of Jesus. Our God is incarnate. If adoration means growing in knowledge of God, the I choose to do that in prayer, meditation, but mostly in relationship and service with others. If prayer and meditation before the monstrance or host is meaningful to some, so be it. There are many ways to serve the Lord. But Jesus did it through people.
I totally agree. I frequently
I totally agree. I frequently set in the church alone to pray but when I receive the host I know I am becoming one with Jesus as I partake in this beautiful miracle.
Right. Eucharist is an
Right. Eucharist is an activity, not a thing. It invites participation, not being put on a pedestal and gazed at from afar. There is enough of that in Catholicism as is.
I agree with Steve. While I
I agree with Steve. While I respect those who practice adoration in a chapel, I think they miss the point that feeling the presence of Jesus can only be found in the Eucharist. We see, if we look, God in every person we encounter.
Anonymous said, "While I
Anonymous said, "While I respect those who practice adoration in a chapel, I think they miss the point that feeling the presence of Jesus can only be found in the Eucharist."
Who says? Are you absolutely sure this is true?
Remember, He didn't spend
Remember, He didn't spend 24/7 healing and feeding. Jesus also withdrew from time to time with his apostles, sometimes without, to pray in solitude with his Father.
No one does, that I know of, say that Eucharistic adoration should SUBSTITUTE for acts of charity. But you're right, many either can't get to it, or have other responsibilities, and that's perfectally fine! :-)
We should all just remember: The means which Jesus, through His Church, offers grace to aid us in our lives are LEGION! Whatever is most helpful toward our slavation in addition to receiving Him in Communion, we should remember to take advantage of when we can. Afterall, God offeres it to us for FREE!!
As a CSC you would know about
As a CSC you would know about all of those who participate in this on the campus of Notre Dame and are still involved with social action.
Thank you for stating so well
Thank you for stating so well what I was thinking.
Max good job Eucharistic
Max good job
Eucharistic adoration appeals to the less literate, making me think this is just the right place to have a religious experience. You stated it often puts you "into a mood of pure reverence" and I think this is exactly how Eucharist adoration attracts, rather than repels others.
For we are not peddlers of God's word like so many; but in Christ we speak as persons of sincerity, as persons sent from God and standing in his presence.
- 2 Corinthians 2:17
I have many criticisms of the
I have many criticisms of the present Roman Catholic church and am a strong advocate of Vatican 2 but Eucharistic Adoration is not one of them.
Eucharistic Adoration is a lovely time for meditation on the spiritual part of our makeup. We as humans do not take enough time for quiet meditation and just quiet time to "be still and know that I am God".
I strongly approve and it is not a threat to Vatican 2 nor my beliefs.
No matter how you try to
No matter how you try to paint it, Eucharistic Adoration in a monstrance is ABUSE of the sacrament. It carries no theological validity at all. You can say it brings people to a quiet spiritual place but it also brings people to a backward and ignorant approach to Christ's real presence.
There's no theological
There's no theological validity to spending time with Jesus? You can only come to this conclusion if you do not believe in the Real Presence of Jesus Christ in the Eucharist. Yes, Jesus is present in other forms: in the word, in each other, etc. But his presence in the Eucharist is quite different; it's a presence "par excellence". That is, a presence above and beyond any other. That's why we genuflect before the tabernacle, but not before each other or the Bible. If you don't get that, then you are missing out on a very fundamental part of the Church's teaching, unchanged for 2000 years. There's no going backwards here.
Thank you, Max, for your
Thank you, Max, for your testimony. Your description of the actual experience of Eucharistic Adoration, as opposed to an exposition of its theology, offers a means of reconciliation between the traditional and the progressive. Everyone today needs a time to find stillness, to recover from the brutal cacophony assaulting our senses every waking hour. The exposition of the Blessed Sacrament presents Christians with an opportunity to place themselves outside of time, to focus on the Eternal Center of existence, much in the same way our brothers and sisters of Eastern faiths practice. For us that Center is a person, Jesus, whose presence we acknowledge in the Sacred Host. Its circular form surrounded by radiating beams of gold creates a Christian mandala, reminding us that we all participate in His Body, everywhere and always. When we truly empty ourselves in adoration the veil separating us from one another dissolves, and we see not divided, waring entities, but fellow members of the Body before us. Here we directly experience the basis for compassion, selflessness, and justice. Surely here we have our common, sacred ground.
Max, Thank you for your
Max,
Thank you for your simple, yet extremely eloquent defense of Eucharistic Adoration. Our world today is in need of more quiet, more time in quiet prayer, and more appreciation of the Presence of God in our world. Rather than composing a theological treatise in defense of Eucharistic Adoration, I endorse your notion of "try it, you'll like it!" Thank you for your insights.
Thank you, Max, for your
Thank you, Max, for your reflection on prayer before the eucharist.
This laudable practice of our tradition is one that has been a "life line" for many who are seeking a center, a focus, the Holy Other, in the midst of the disconnect and disorder found often in daily living.
I hope that we can give new (re-newed) and deepened expression to the Gospel life through this form of prayer. As we seek to "sing a new church into being" we are given the noble task of giving new impetus to ancient practice.
See the Body of Christ gathered at the Table to be nourished by the Body of Christ upon the Table!
There is a place for
There is a place for devotion; there is a need for contemplative prayer and for affective prayer. And Mr. Lindenman is correct about the need for oases in an urban and hectic environment. Just one point: Twice the author makes reference to "adoring the host." It is NOT the "host" that's being adored in Eucharistic Adoration. I don't think this is nitpicking. It is always and only God who is being adored.
Thank you.
Thank you for an opportunity
Thank you for an opportunity to hear how new memebers of the church find comfort in the presence of the Eucharistic Adoration practice.
Unfortunately, those of us with "baggage" (sometimes) do see this as a movement back to pre-Vatican II spirituality. But just what that is, is
most likely dependent on our ability to separate reality from superstition.
Depending on our experience of God in our life we will approach religious
practices from love and reverance, or from fear and ignorance.
We certainly have ample opportunities for seeing God in our world. I see God in the eyes of children, the people waiting for the bus, the homeless men and women downtown in Chicago. I see God in all the beauty of nature and the excitement of spectators at Wrigley field. I see God in the creative beauty of art work in our art museums.
And, Yes, I most certainly see God in the Eucharist each day at Mass.
Having time to sit in the quiet presence of the Eucharist in an adoration chapel is a gift to be teasured.I am happy you have found it to be so.
Contrary to Clint Green's
Contrary to Clint Green's understanding of the Spirit of Vatican II, I disagree, as do millions of other Catholics. It is only beginning to take hold and the greatest impact will be seen in this century. Sorry to disappoint the right wingers but your era is coming to an end. Old Catholicism prior to Vatican II can't sustain itself because so much of it is based on magical myths and very poor theology that doesn't remotely represent Christ's teachings! It's decaying rapidly and a new Church is emerging. Thanks be to God!
"understanding of the Spirit
"understanding of the Spirit of Vatican II"
as opposed to, you know, the actual DOCUMENTS on Vatican II, which in no was say what you are saying.
"Old Catholicism prior to Vatican II can't sustain itself because so much of it is based on magical myths"
this is ignorant rubbish. give me a SINGLE 'magical myth' that the vatican ii council marked for rejection. give me a document name and paragraph number. i mean, you must have obviously studied them to make a statement like that honestly, right? so this should be very easy for you.
i'll check back for your reply.
Just because millions may
Just because millions may diagree doesn't make it right. As Pete the Greek said, there is a grave misunderstanding, misinterpretation, and misapplication of the actual documents of Vatican II, which is just now finally being recognized and corrected. It's not all that unusual, actually, as history has shown that in the 40 - 50 years following a church council, there is much confusion as the faithful come to understand and appreciate the teachings of the church fathers. We're at the tail end of the time now, in case you hadn't noticed.
There's no such thing as "old Catholicism prior to Vatican II". The reality is that Vatican II didn't do away with anything. It simply made the rich traditions and practices of our faith more understandable and accesible to the common man. It didn't do away with the Latin Mass; it added Mass in the vernacular. It didn't do away with habits for religious communities; it opened up the option to wear "civilian" clothes. And it certainly didn't give the functions proper to the priest over to the laity; rather, it called the laity to greater participation in the roles that are theirs by virtue of their baptism.
Why do so many people reduce
Why do so many people reduce the act of Eucharistic Adoration a "step backword"? I totally disagree with Fr. McBrien. Have we stooped to a new low by making Eucharistic Adoration part of the "conservative vs liberal" discussion? This has absolutely nothing to do with old fashioned or back in the dark ages. Come on people, open your eyes. THIS IS THE VERY LIVING PRESENCE OF JESUS THAT WE SQUABLE ABOUT. THE SO-CALLED ENLIGHTENED PEOPLE HAVE THROWN OUT ANY SENSE OF HUMILITY. WE NEED TO REALIZE WHAT A BEAUTIFUL GIFT OF CHRIST'S PRESENCE WE HAVE!!! Yes, Christ is present in the Word, the Assembly and the person of the priest as well. However, in the Euchartist, He is present to us in a very special way. The Eucharistic Adoration is an extention of the Mass. It points us back to the celebration of Mass. Every spiritual practice we as Catholics engage in, grounds us in and points us to this sacred celebration of the Mass. How can people like Fr. McBrien and others be so shallow as to consider it something from the dark ages. This is NOT a liberal or conservative act. It is an act of falling in love over and over again with Christ. Lets not reduce this to something old fashioned but something that engages us in a deeper more contemplative prayerful relationship with God.
Here, here! Yes, can we
Here, here! Yes, can we please stop making this a "Liberal versus Conservative" non-issue? Adoration isn't mandatory, so if certain Catholics don't agree with it/enjoy it/like it, then they don't have to participate. Leave the people alone that actually do get some peace out of it.
This article is not about Fr.
This article is not about Fr. McBrien's opinions of Eucharistic Adoration. This lecture is completely out of place, given the comments which preceded yours.
Perhaps you just came here with a proconceived opinion and never bothered to read any comments. In any event, your comment is not in the spirit of this discussion.
Eucharistic adoration in the
Eucharistic adoration in the 1950's.
I participated in Eucharistic adoration in my Jesuit high school in the 1950's, but I wasn't sure what the devotion was about. To me it did not fit with Sunday liturgy. In college days I joined the Liturgical Movement and learned from contemplative Benedictines. The Eucharist is to be 'shared' (modern Greek 'evcharisto' is 'thank you'). The Eucharist as adored was a later addition to Church practice. Vatican II brought out the meaning of Church as community in its liturgical life.
You 'sit' and pray in silence before the altar in a monastic church. The altar, the place of meeting and prayer for the community, becomes the focal point for concentration. You try to quiet the 'monkey noise'. And when you are done with the 'sitting' prayer, you go out to do your work. And so with us lay people. We 'sit' in prayer, and then go out to our regular work, following the words of St James to show the Kingdom of God in our work.
If some people do this in Eucharistic adoration, wonderful for them!
I would never suggest that I
I would never suggest that I could speak for Fr. McBrien in response to the concerns of these posts, but I think he would concur that balance is the key, as well as a careful distinction between what is core and what is peripheral. Certainly, I do think Father would agree with adoration as a private devotion and as an occasion for personal reflection and prayer.
I have a problem with this statement: "Celebrating the Liturgy of the Eucharist and adoration of the Eucharist are central to Catholicism." Celebrating the Liturgy is central; adoration is peripheral, though uniquely Catholic.
And Jesus said, " Take this
And Jesus said, " Take this and look at it!"
Please add Mission San Luis
Please add Mission San Luis Obispo,California to your list of sites for Eucharistic Adoration. This is a tourist destination and we are visited by people from all over the world. Adoration is from 9am. to 5pm. ,the first Friday of the month, in the chapel For information call 805-781-8220.
The Church herself fosters a
The Church herself fosters a call to Eucharistic adoration, but in her wisdom, she attempts to bring a sense of balance and purpose to the exercise. there is an inherent pitfall of over emphasizing the Eucharist as 'thing' and 'thing in itself' without the larger scope of meaning of Eucharist as verb, or action of the body of Christ. We are still infested with the early Church heresy of professing everything corporeal as evil adn unworthy, yet it is God who redeemed and wedded humanity to the very essence of divinity by the gift of the Incarnation. No longer can the flesh of humanity be thought unworthy to bear the imprint of the divine, not because of anything we have done, but because God so wills it. Those critics are not fearful of opening the door to superstition, but they are fearful of the diminishment of the fullness of the gift of the Eucharist which by its very nature,commissions us to act to bring about the kingdom of God in our midst. As St. Augustine said, and I loosely bastardize his expression, the body of Christ, eats the body of Christ, to become the body of Christ, to og into the world to be the body of Christ. This other aspect by and large has been lost in the privitization and individualization of Eucharistic Adoration.
Thanks, Max, for putting this
Thanks, Max, for putting this in another context. As a theologian who fears the institutional penchant for returning to pre-Vatican II practices, I found myself agreeing with Fr. McBrien's critique of Eucharistic adoration. But your perspective is a valid one and one with which I, too, at age 75 can be comfortable. The reverent, meditative silence one experiences in front of the Blessed Sacrament is a welcome relief from the noises of the world. I appreciate your comments.
At the risk of repeating my
At the risk of repeating my earlier comments...
The statment "returning to pre-Vatican II practices" makes absolutely no sense, as Vatican II didn't do away with any practices. Everything we did prior to 1962 continues to be a valid and beautiful way to express our faith. Vatican II gave us some new ways (e.g. Mass in the vernacular), but those in no way invalidated the earlier practices.
I have no objections to
I have no objections to Eucharistic adoration. It can serve as a wonderful opportunty for meditation and contemplation. I would hope that in the midst of Eucharistic adoration some of us involved would from time to time consider that the Word of God is present in all matter and therefore the kind of adoration done by such mystics as Teilhard de Chardin, adoration of the whole earth as a sacrament of God's presence, is also to be commended. We also need to remember, as some of the earlier commentators have inferred that the word "this" in the phrase "This is my body," does not, according to most exegets, refer to the element of bread. Rather the object of this pronoun is the same as that of the "this" in the following phrase, "Do this....." Jesus was, in effect, saying, "When you share bread in my name, I am in your midst and you are my Body." The Host is indeed the medium of Christ's presence but when we in our worshp confine the presence of Christ to the Host, we fail to appreciate the fullness of Christ's sacramental presence in our lives.
Post new comment