NCR on Kindle - NCR classifieds - YouTube - Twitter - Facebook - Email Alerts - RSS
Institute hosts Catholic conversations
In my column, I have tried to highlight some of the wonderful people who, in different ways and with different charisms, make us proud to be Catholic. From the Franciscan Action Network, to the personal witness of Ambassador Doug Kmiec, to the intellectual endeavors of Pax Romana, the church has some great stories to tell. This month, I want to talk about a project with which I am engaged.
Since the start of the year, I have been a visiting fellow at The Catholic University of America’s Institute for Policy Research & Catholic Studies. The institute is Catholic University’s on-campus think tank, highlighting and often funding the work of our fellows, and hoping to shape public debate in light of the research we produce and the Catholic values that are at the heart of the university’s intellectual mission. Since Stephen Schneck became the director six years ago, he has ramped up the institute’s profile with conferences and symposia on a range of important issues. In my eight months working there, I have reached one central conclusion: The institute moves a lot of intellectual lumber.
Next month, the institute is hosting a speech by British political philosopher, Phillip Blond, author of Red Tory: How Left and Right Have Broken Britain and How We Can Fix It. British Prime Minster David Cameron, announcing his “Big Society” agenda that seeks to remove some of the rough edges of modern capitalist society, has frequently cited Blond’s ideas. Responding to Blond at the institute will be William Galston, senior fellow at the Brookings Institution and one of America’s foremost political thinkers, as well as Congressman Jeff Fortenberry, R-Neb. At a time when the United Kingdom’s Conservative Party is moving away from the excesses of Thatcherism, and the conservative party in the U.S. is doubling down, this will make for a fascinating discussion.
Also in October, the institute is cosponsoring a three-day conference on Catholic identity in parochial elementary and high schools. That conference will include a presentation by Bishop David O’Connell of Trenton, N.J., who during his tenure at The Catholic University of America focused the entire university on the issue of Catholic identity and now is charged with running 50 Catholic elementary and high schools. His talk alone will be worth the price of admission.
On Oct. 26, the institute is cosponsoring a daylong conference on efforts to combat human trafficking with the Franciscan Action Network. The keynote address will be given by Joy Ngozi Ezeilo, the United Nations Special Rapporteur on Trafficking. One panel will feature various advocates on the issue, addressing what can be done, and another panel will feature victims of human trafficking telling their stories. This horrible crime of trafficking in human beings has been gaining increased attention both in secular and religious circles.
Preview NCR's Family Life Issue
Watch this video from NCR Editor Dennis Coday for highlights from our annual Family Life special section.

You won't find these articles on our website. Subscribe now to receive all the content from each biweekly issue.
On Nov. 1, institute fellow William D’Antonio will be the featured presenter at an event at the National Press Club, cosponsored by NCR. D’Antonio will be presenting findings from his ongoing research into Catholic attitudes, with data from 1987 to the present. This will be the most exhaustive survey of Catholic attitudes on a range of topics. Importantly, D’Antonio’s survey includes a sampling of Latino Catholics, opening a window into their attitudes and opinions. Often, polling outfits do not have a sufficiently large sample of Latino Catholics to assess the data so D’Antonio believes his findings will be especially important for this growing segment of both the Catholic and broader U.S. populations.
Rounding out the semester, the Catholic Association of Latino Leaders will be coming to Catholic University’s campus to cosponsor an event on tuition tax credits. The conference will examine the state of current laws in various states, and help Catholic advocates and the staffs of state Catholic conferences find ways to promote legislation that helps parents afford Catholic schools.
These conferences are the most visible part of what institute does, but for me, the best part of being a visiting fellow is my interaction with the other fellows. Writers lead solitary lives, and it is so refreshing to be back on campus, surrounded by that unique energy that young people bring to intellectual endeavors. The institute has three splendid graduate student fellows who not only ask the most pointed questions on any given topic, they help this computer Luddite navigate the world of technology!
Every semester, there are four or five brown bag lunches to which all the fellows are invited. One of the fellows gives a short presentation on the areas of research he or she is exploring. These lunches cut against the hyperspecialization that has afflicted the modern academy for decades. Additionally, in the age of Google, serendipity is more and more difficult to experience. Search engines are designed to narrow the focus, not enlarge it, and this cast of mind shapes our intellectual outlook in unhealthy ways. Sitting down for lunch with very smart professors who explain their research in areas about which I know absolutely nothing is a profoundly countercultural and intellectually challenging experience.
Too often, discussions of “Catholic identity” at Catholic colleges and universities are reduced to a defensive posture -- for example, barring pro-choice speakers from campus. But, at the institute, every day I see that there is a positive way to bring our Catholic faith to important intellectual debates. We Catholics have a good tale to tell, and at Catholic University, that tale is being told.
[Michael Sean Winters writes about religion and politics on his Distinctly Catholic blog on the NCR site, at NCRonline.org/blogs/distinctly-catholic.]





Fellows and brown-bag
Fellows and brown-bag lunches....yawn....
"Charisms" and "magisterium,"
"Charisms" and "magisterium," relatively new and overused terms that only attempt to add majestic mystery to the story about Jesus and his message in the gospels--and other writings that were left out of the canon because they were insufficiently politically correct for those early church leaders who selected that canon. Angelica, of EWTN memory, couldn't get through a single humorous segment without bandying about the term "magisterium" as if it meant we should just sit there and listen all those male bosses. Well, that's exactly what it does mean.
If I recall correctly, after his coronation, Paul VI removed the papal triple tiara and placed it on the altar in St. Peter's as a symbol that his papacy was taking first steps to also doff the last vestiges of the only remaining absolute monarchy of the West. It was such an inappropriate symbol of all that had gone bad with one of the main communions of those who considered themselves followers of the humble rabbi of Israel who was attempting to bring his own "church" to heel for all its hypocrisy. Paul VI also put an end to the use of the ostentatious "sedia gestatory," that parading obscenity that raised royal popes above the mobs for their viewing and screaming, "Viva il Papa!"
John Paul II and Benedict have been doing all that is possible to try to reform the reform represented by those moves and numerous others. That wise, necessary, Jesus-like reform came from Good John XXII's Second Vatican Council. No church council in history has so quickly been undone. So where's the conversation? As soon as some theologian like Hans Kung, Charles Curran, or Elizabeth Johnson say or write anything that has not first passed Benedict's censors, they are crudely and cruelly put down as theological idiots. Even like sinners who are as good as excommunicated and prevented from any discourse, any conversation, at a "Catholic" institution. Everything is done officially in an effort to destroy them. Very Christian!
What's this "Catholic identity" that is to be clarified by Bishop David O'Donnell so well that it is worth a "price of admission?" I guess dropping money in church baskets is a price of admission, too. I wonder if Jesus charged admission to any of those who gathered to hear him speak--or those who happened to be on that hillside waiting to share in the miraculous "loaves and fishes." Did the Apostles have to pay for their Last Supper? My parish, directed by diocesan headquarters, is daring to inaugurate a huge capital fund collection in the middle of this Second Great Depression. The carpet in the center aisle needs to be replaced, the tabernacle moved (to a high altar against the back wall, I guess), the pews reconditioned, and money is needed for a pre-school. Get 'em young. Brain-washing is wisely started earlier in these times that harken back to deciding how everyone thinks and believes. Those men really believe they have control over that.
How are "Catholic" attitudes and opinions, in general, different than other Christian attitudes and opinions--and yes, who decides what they should be? As for promoting "legislation that helps parents afford Catholic schools," why do we dare to violate the Constitution of the United States with the presumption that it is a public responsibility to pay for Catholic education? Why must we concede that our homes and churches are inadequate venues for sharing the ideas of Jesus?
And why bother with "areas of research" pursued by graduate student fellows, when freedom of conscience is not respected, when all must be cleared with Cardinal Levada at the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (The Holy Office of the Inquisition) or it won't fly, anyway? Why bother to pretend we display wide acceptance and respect for those "splendid graduate students" and their "areas of research" in one sentence, and in the very next sentence announce the gatherings to which they are graciously invited "cut against hyperspecialization that has afflicted the modern academy?" You can't have it both ways! You think or you don't. You form your beliefs or you don't. Conversation? Make sure you check with Benedict and his cabinet concerning the topics you have discussed before you give a thought to publishing any of them.
Post new comment