Billy the bully is bad for the church

May. 11, 2010
Catholic League president Bill Donohue makes a point on CNN.

Commentary

It’s good to be William Donohue, president of the “Catholic League for Religious and Civil Rights.” For one, there’s money in fighting bigotry: Donohue earned $372,501 in salary and deferred compensation in 2008, according to the group’s most recent IRS disclosure report.

Plus, no heavy lifting. Produce serious research on the impact of antichurch prejudice on the lives of the nation’s 70 million Catholics? No way. Despite assets exceeding $22 million, no one could fairly accuse the Catholic League of engaging in such laborious, potentially useful, but expensive endeavors.

A campaign to educate Americans on Catholic contributions to the country and the culture? Get serious. The league’s efforts, such as they are, remain focused largely on highlighting intrachurch squabbles, silliness such as “the war on Christmas,” and defending the indefensible.

Hopping by cab from your office on Manhattan’s Seventh Avenue to midtown network and cable news studios to obnoxiously opine on the latest church controversy seems to be the toughest aspect of the job.

But the best part of being president of the Catholic League is you can say almost anything, impugn nearly anyone, make the most outlandish public statements, and you’re never held accountable.

“Hollywood is controlled by secular Jews who hate Christianity in general and Catholicism in particular,” Donohue declared in 2004. Fr. Charles Coughlin, the 1930s-era radio priest, could not have said it better.

In 1997, journalists Jason Berry and Gerald Renner broke the story of Fr. Marcial Maciel’s long-standing rape and abuse of young Legion of Christ seminarians. “Several [of the seminarians, including one who was a 12-year-old at the time Maciel abused him] said Maciel told them he had permission from Pope Pius XII to seek them out sexually for relief,” the two wrote in the Hartford Courant.

Donohue offered this belligerent non sequitur in response: “To think any priest would tell some other priest [sic] that the pope gave him the thumbs up to have sex with another priest -- all for the purpose of relieving the poor fellow of some malady -- is the kind of balderdash that wouldn’t convince the most unscrupulous editor at any of the weekly tabloids.”

There’s more.

In 2004, NCR revealed that the chairman of the Republican National Committee’s “Catholic Outreach” effort, when he was working as a philosophy professor at New York’s Fordham University, invited a vulnerable 18-year-old freshman (she grew up in foster care and could not legally drink alcohol in New York) for an Ash Wednesday-eve night of carousing that resulted in an booze-driven exchange of sexual favors. The poor professor, explained Donohue, fell victim to a “drunken female he met [sic] in a bar.”

NCR: February 3-16, 2012

Subscribe to NCR to get all the news and special features that aren't always available online. In this issue:

- US News: Bishops Host Conference on Immigration
Conference fields advocates' questions on law, policy

- Special Section: Deacons. Serving as parish administrator; roles of wives; and more

- Study: Black Catholics are more engaged
New study by Notre Dame researcher about parish involvement in America

Subscribe now!

And now, Billy the Bully has solved the clergy sex abuse crisis.

In repeated recent public forums, Donohue says that since “most” or “the vast majority” of the abuse involved post-pubescent males, then the cause of the crisis is gay priests.

Donohue’s argument is baloney.

According to the 2004 study by the John Jay School of Criminal Justice commissioned by the U.S. bishops, nearly half of the cases of abuse by clergy in the United States involve victims ages 12 or younger -- and about 20 percent of the victims were girls. Add 13- and 14-year-olds to the mix and 73.4 percent of the clergy molesters and rapists are accounted for.

Bottom line: Nearly half of the victims were sixth-graders or younger, while three-quarters were junior high age or younger. These victims, barks Donohue, are not “kids.”

Meanwhile, Donohue keeps some strange company. According to the league’s Web site, Donohue is a member of the board of advisors of Catholic Citizens of Illinois, a group whose founder and chairman, Tom Roeser, “has taken in recent years to writing essays that are filled with factual errors and misrepresentations about events in the archdiocese of Chicago,” according to Cardinal Francis George. “At times when the pope or the bishops’ teachings or activities do not conform in every detail to his political convictions, he descends to hate-mongering,” George wrote in a March 2010 letter to board members.

Surely, the condemnations and statements of contempt that fly off the league’s Web site faster than a Jonathan Broxton fastball reaches home plate have been issued against Roeser. Oops, apparently not. Lesson: Right-wing attacks on the church and its leaders get a pass from the “Catholic League.”

Years ago, in her beautifully crafted memoir, Private Faces/Public Places, Abigail McCarthy, wife of Minnesota Sen. Eugene McCarthy, wrote that their namesake senator, anticommunist demagogue Joe McCarthy, had a point: There were communist spies working in the government who aimed to bring harm to the United States. But Joe McCarthy’s guilt-by-association tactics, his over-the-top rhetoric and his clownish behavior, wrote Abigail, were so irresponsible that they actually harmed those who were serious about U.S. security. How can the threat be serious if the messenger is such a fool?

Donohue, too, has a point: Anti-Catholicism exists. It is real, though far more nuanced than in the days of “No Irish Need Apply.” Instead, as New York Times columnist Nicholas Kristof noted this month, “There is often a liberal and secular snobbishness toward the church as a whole -- and that is unfair.”

The Catholic community’s response to this frequently subtle bigotry is a buffoonish bully, a carnival barker posing as a defender of the faith. Such behavior might make for good television (which prefers heat to light) but it does nothing to help the church. In fact, it does considerable harm because it plays to the worst stereotypes of triumphalism, homophobia, misogyny and intolerance the church long since abandoned.

But it’s good work if you can get it.

[Joe Feuerherd is NCR publisher. His e-mail address is jfeuerherd@ncronline.org.]

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Bill Donohue writes back: Catholic League president responds to NCR column

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Send in the clowns. They're

Send in the clowns. They're all over Fox News.

Amen.

Amen.

In all this mess real God has

In all this mess real God has beed already forgotten, that sad...
Cheers qlwik.

THANK YOU, Joe for finally

THANK YOU, Joe for finally writing something about this baffoon. Can anyone please talk to the networks and offer them an alternative to this guy. He has long been an embarassment to all of us. Surely he has a Board of Directors that should hold him accountable, or is it his own show. Perhaps an IRS investigation is necessary to assure that the Catholic League meets all the standards for a not for profit status.

If you want an IRS audit,

If you want an IRS audit, then audit Sister Keehan of the Catholic Health Care Association also. At least Bill, who is a PHD, does not claim to be a religious. Bill unlike sister supports the Bishops. Bill unlike the NCR and it's ilk, defend Jesus Christ! Bill believes that Jesus Christ is Lord and God. I'd rather stand next to William Donohue on Judgement Day than your columnists on NCR.

God Bless you Bill

Bill believes that Jesus

Bill believes that Jesus Christ is Lord and God. I'd rather stand next to William Donohue on Judgement Day than your columnists on NCR.
_________________________________________________________________
Wrong!!! Bill and the rest of the heirarchs believe Jesus is their puppet.
If there is ever a judgment day and Jesus judges the living and the dead I'd get as far away from Bill the pill as possible.

If there ever is a judgement

If there ever is a judgement day? Believe Catholic doctrine much?

And I guess you'll stand next

And I guess you'll stand next to him proudly and Anonymously?

According to Tradition, court

According to Tradition, court jesters are a needed component in a monarchial situation.

A well-written article Joe!

A well-written article Joe! I have been engaged in researching Pope Pius XII for the last ten years of so. Donohue's website maintains much of the fiction material so beloved by the "canonise him now" lobby groups. Donohue's "no-evidence needed" attacks on those he deems as attacking the Church does nothing to help those who seek the truth about the war-time Pope and the work of the Church in rescue or desertion of the Jews of Europe. I also recognise that on the scale of issue importance, Pius is not the most important issue, but Donohue's a-historical, a-theological and hysterical behaviour serves noone but his own clique and gives the rest of the world, and a good part of the Church, a bit of a giggle. Here in Australia there are many of us who are very glad Donohue is "over there" and not "over here".

Paul Very well said. Until we

Paul

Very well said. Until we get the truth on Pius XI(Reichskonkordat of 1933) and his advisor Pius XII we will never have a chance of making any sense out of any of those awful years that resulted in the deaths of 6 million Jews and the death totals of 60 million human beings. AND, exactly how is that representative of the Churches Pro-life and Family Values agenda.

For me the only solution is for the Vatican to open its archives, including the popes secret archives, to EVERYONE. If ten thousand Jewish scholars and researchers pronounce the Vatican free from sin and error than the world will truly know the facts. Even if it is revealed that the Vatican, not the faithful, was just self-serving and totally stupid I can accept that because we are all that way.

Embarassed to say I don't

Embarassed to say I don't know "Billy the Bully, but he looks (and sounds) a lot like Rush Limbaugh.

I'm afraid I don't know

I'm afraid I don't know "Billy the Bully". It strikes me , though, that he looks (and sounds) a lot like Rush Limbaugh.

Mr Feuerherd: It's the

Mr Feuerherd:
It's the ultimate irony that you write such an article. Donahue might be a little belligerent, and have his foibles, but any ill byproduct pales in comparison to what this rag publishes and spews on a daily basis. You encourage hatred and disdain for the Church (in it's full meaning, head (hierarchy) and members).

Save for Mr. Allen NCR is one of the great scandals in the US Church today.

Great scandals? The NCR is

Great scandals? The NCR is hardly on par with the pedophilia crisis. Sounds to me like you and Billy have much in common.

Joe: Who says the "worst

Joe: Who says the "worst stereotypes of triumphalism, homophobia, misogyny and intolerance" have been abandoned by the church? Not in my diocese they haven't.

Hopefully this is not some

Hopefully this is not some sort of life-time appointment!

"It plays to the worst

"It plays to the worst stereotypes of triumphalism, homophobia, misogyny and intolerance THE CHURCH HAS LONG SINCE ABANDONED." Really? With Cardinals and Bishops in long capes, with another Cardinal, the number two in the Vatican, blaming homosexuality for all the pedophilia problems of the Church, with Church authorities running away from women religious in Rome, well... has the Church really abandoned triumphalism, homophobia, misogyny and intolerance? Lets get real here! Many thanks!

The headline says it all! I

The headline says it all! I agree 100% - he's bad for the Church!

A couple of years ago South

A couple of years ago South Park lampooned Donahue in their Easter episode where he is made out to be holier than the Pope, which in his diatribes is not far from the truth.

He takes the most extreme positions for what I believe his is own personal ego and the Church as a whole is worse off for it. The Catholic League has never had credibility in my eyes.

Hmm ... South Park ridiculed

Hmm ... South Park ridiculed Mr Donahue in their "Easter" episode? A better
better endorsment for Donahue is hard to find. He must be doing something terribly right and actually defending the faith for those wingnuts to take notice.

Be real, Joe. Using a

Be real, Joe. Using a satirical cartoon's criticism as a basis to support Donahue is senseless. Donahue and his ilk in CUF do damage by supporting people like Maciel as if any admission of personal wrong doing reflects on the whole church. If we return to following the teachings of Christ, instead of worrying about the image we will become the church we are supposed to be.

I'd be interested to know

I'd be interested to know where the money comes from. Is this IRD at it again?

At last, someone has had the

At last, someone has had the courage to say it. Not a Cardinal or bishop; just a good Catholic layman who has to work for his salary.

Where does the money for

Where does the money for Donahue's salary and deferred compensation come from?

Probably from tax-free

Probably from tax-free donations! That's my guess.

What's his name is full of

What's his name is full of it, baloney, that is.

The worst of it is that so many people in the pews believe he is some kind of a representative voice for the Roman Catholic Church.

Good Gawd, don't we have enough problems?

Sister Maureen Paul Turlish
New Castle, Delaware
maureenpaulturlish@yahoo.com

With "friends" like him, who

With "friends" like him, who needs enemies? Sadly, Sister Maureen is correct-many people do believe him to be a responsible representative of the Roman Church. He is an embarrassment to all Christianity, as intolerant to any who would disagree with his verbal pugilistics as he feels "they" are toward Roman Catholicism.

There are plenty of secular knee-jerk reactionaries, buffoons, and blowhards on the airwaves without his contributions.

H.G. Bishop TIMOTHY (MacLam)
Pilgrim Prayer & Healing Ministries

Sr. Maureen, Once again you

Sr. Maureen,

Once again you said it, perfectly. Also, I would include with Billy the Bully as not being good representatives of/for the Catholic Church the likes of: O'Reilly, Hannity, Scalia, Thomas, Roberts, Alito, Kennedy, Ingraham, Malkin, Jeb Bush, Newt Gingrich, Buchanan, Noonan, Weigel, Weyrich, Gaffney, Bennett, Armitage, Monaghan, Voinvoich, DeWine(I always voted for them, silly me and never again) and about a thousand others who belong to the Repub party, the Heritage Foundation, the American Enterprise Institute, etc, ad nauseam.

OR, is the tribulation upon us because so many things advocated by the Vatican, not the faithful, is in it's endless support of the Repub party and it's endless agenda of profits, death, and its endless violation of anything even coming close to the REAL Pro-life and Family Values concept.

Something is wrong: very, very, very wrong.

Could it be that Jesus warnings to not merge church and state("Render unto Caesar...) is revealing the inherent dangers and the huge amount of damage done by those who merge church and state despite those warnings. ALSO, could it be that absolute power corrupts, absolutely.

Sr. Maureen, I would surely like to hear your opinions on the aforementioned issues.

Just thinking and wondering---

Thank you for an excellent

Thank you for an excellent article on this man who is doing great harm to the church, and it amazes me that he is totally unaware of the damage he is doing.
Unfortunately, many people in my age bracket (latter 70s) believe in him. I guess it is easier to be a pray, pay, and obey catholic than a thinking catholic.

"....thinking Catholic"? If

"....thinking Catholic"? If word of that gets around, you might find yourself tied to a stake with lots of kindling around your feet.

Amen to all that. His

Amen to all that. His behavior shames all Catholics.

$372,501, nice work if you

$372,501, nice work if you can get it. But does that include expenses? If Cardinal George can complain about Donohue's associates how about New York's Archbishop Dolan. Take a look at his blog http://blog.archny.org. Especially his guest George Weigel's comments. Some of Dolan's and Weigel's remarks could have easily come from the pen of Donohue.

JF: You have some excellent

JF:
You have some excellent suggestions for Catholic League projects.
I just cant believe the Catholic League has $20 Million in assets.
And how can they afford to pay Wm. Donahue's huge salary and an office in New York?
When the office was in Milwaukee they could barely make payroll.
The contributors were mostly small donations.
Is there any way to discover who contributes to CL?
Are they receiving donations that have political connections? Or from the hierarchy of the Church?
Excellent article.
Thanks.

I love this site!! It's good

I love this site!! It's good to see that I am not the only one who thinks William Donahue is a bully and a liar. His take on blaming the clergy sex abuse on gays is outrageous. thanks for a great article!

When Mr. Feuerherd declares

When Mr. Feuerherd declares Donahue's job to be "good work if you can get it,"
I think he means it. If it were as he describes it, the job would be one for
which he is entirely suited. His own record at NCR proves that he has the requisite tact, taste and ethical standards.

If my words are too subtle for any reader, what I mean is that Feuerherd has
proven over and over that he himself is a bigoted buffoon.

Mr Donahue is not alone as

Mr Donahue is not alone as THE carnival barker posing as a defender of the Faith.

Look at the comments that came from Rome following the NYTimes articles.

Rome's Theme: "Shoot the Messenger."

I have solved the problem as far as 'leadership' is concerned. Catholic hierarchy has shown none so they have no legitimate authority.

Maybe I am waiting for Pope Benedict to show me his birth certificate.

I agree with everything in

I agree with everything in this article except the last line: the church has not abandoned triumphalism, homophobia, misogyny or intolerance-- and that's why people like Donohue can continue to blabber so. He has a lot of clerical support with those tactics. For shame!

"Donohue’s argument is

"Donohue’s argument is baloney."

Oh, you are SO right about "Billy the Bully." I saw one of his non sequitur tirades on CNN's Rick Sanchez show and was furious about it. I commented on it by saying that Bill Donohue would serve the church best by selling hot dogs at baseball games.

Is the Catholic League THAT hard up for members that they put Bill Donohue as their leader? This guy always seems so 'pleased' with himself after he has insulted several categories of good and holy human beings.

"But the best part of being president of the Catholic League is you can say almost anything, impugn nearly anyone, make the most outlandish public statements, and you’re never held accountable."

The way he twists facts and indicts innocent people is matter for the confessional. Here is a guy with apparently no conscience. Anything to protect the Pope? I think not.

I do hold Mr. Donohue accountable. Everyone else should, too. He is way out of control.

You are totally correct, Mr. Feuerherd: Billy the Bully is BAD, really B-A-D for the church.

Billy the Bully - perfect

Billy the Bully - perfect description. But you know what? He's just an opportunistic slob like the other one over at the Cardinal Newman Society. That is what you expect from cannibals.

The real issue I have is that none of the hierarchy in this country (or elsewhere) have the b**ls to tell people that he has no ecclesiastical authority - he doesn't speak for the Church - and he delivers a message inconsistent with our faith.

I don't really care so much what non-Catholics think of him, it's the fact that Catholics themselves by and large are led to believe that the "Catholic League" somehow speaks from a chair of authority.

I understand how the crowd of blowhards like Burke and Chaput would favor him, but exactly why are all the other red-hats so unwilling to speak up? And they wonder why so many Catholics won't accept them as teachers....

I am sure the many in the

I am sure the many in the hierarchy are happy to have a "hatchet man" doing their dirty work for them, bloodying their critics, yet providing them with "plausible deniability" since he is doing it without official sanction.

Man Who Loved Cat

Man Who Loved Cat Dancing,

Sorry about my error regarding you name in my other reply. You can't be more right. He must be silenced. He embarrasses us. He attacks people and institutions that he has no business criticizing. He has no authorization from the USCCB. "NO ECCLESIAL AUTHORITY" is exactly right. In the absence of ccclesial authority he should shut up. The bishops won't say this, but at least NCR does. No criticism of these institutions without ecclesial authority!

Wonderful. It is great that

Wonderful. It is great that someone is able to articulate the feelings and thoughts of, I am sure, many of us. I refuse to pay any attention to him under any circumstanced, but find it amazing to see what he actually receives for his invective and clownish behavior. Sadly, I believe that he actually speaks for many bishops and others in positions of authority. He and Limbaugh are blood brothers, making an excellent living by stirring up hatred and fear.

I subscribed to the Catholic

I subscribed to the Catholic League's publication for one year and found it to be a waste of time and paper. I have rolls of paper in my bathroom which are more useful. Donohue has been a buffoon and a bully for many years and whenever you want a quote which shows Catholics as ignorant, uncaring or even racist the good doctor can always be counted on to provide the needed quote.

Its about time someone stood

Its about time someone stood up to and exposed Bill the Bully. For many years I thought him to be an embarrassment to the Church and cringed when his angry face appeared asd a talking head.

I recall my dismay when Donahue spearheaded a drive to force network TV and advertisers to drop "Nothing Sacred" an excellent series about an inner city priest. I don't recall if Donahue objected to the fact that the young, long haired and socially conscious priest and his pastoral associate nun were too soft on struggling "sinners" or too hard on the pompous prigs at the diocesan chancery. But this excellent drama series was plummetted by Billy the Bully who objected apparently that a Catholic priest was being portrayed as dealing with serious moral and social issues in a grown up way. I don't know who this paranoid group of pseudo Defenders of the Faith represent - but it isn't me.

I was about to comment on the

I was about to comment on the same thing: it was Donahue and the Catholic League who persuaded ABC to drop its excellent TV series, Nothing Sacred, dismissing it as a ploy of enemies of Catholicism to spread lies about the Church. In fact, Nothing Sacred is one of the truest portrayals of "the Church on the ground" that I've ever seen. I used the few episodes a friend recorded for me as the basis for a Lenten study group in 1998 and it had a very good reception, even in a rather conservative group in a parish in Japan. I've been trying to figure out a way to get ABC to release this series for publication on DVD, including the five episodes which were produced but never broadcast. Writing to ABC is like dropping a bit of water into a deep dark well. We need someone "in authority" who could persuade ABC that this series is not the writing from Satan that Donahue has made it out to be, and that there is a significant market for the broadcasts if they would release them for publication on DVD. It's too bad that an unauthorized bigoted loudmouth like Donahue can spoil it for the rest of us, as if he had some authority to patrol commercial productions and ban the ones he sees as contrary to what he believes. Can't we start a campaign for signatures asking for the show on DVD?

the gray face of anglo

the gray face of anglo Catholicism in anglo America

get real.
turn off that darn TV.
come to the Spanish Mass.

Catholicism in English is just a nonstarter
Henry the Eighth and Elizabeth Regina first knew that.

Frere Charles: no one,

Frere Charles: no one, INCLUDING YOURSELF, has a God given right ie a free pass to be racist against blacks, browns, whites or POKADOTS. Well maybe pokadots unless of course they are freckles.
Whatever color whatever ethnicity sweeping ie blanket negative statements regarding entire groups including gender, and sexual orientation, for that matter are unnacceptable, hatefully dysfunctional, and a bunch of CRAPPA MAGNA!!!

thank you very much, and in

thank you very much, and in this spirit of inclusiveness I look forward to seeing you at the Spanish Mass, howsoever anonymously

Some people will believe mr.

Some people will believe mr. donahue,however it does not absolve the 'pope and his minions' for their evil deeds. What does the number of victims have to climb to in order for legislation to be passed that will provide the victims justice ? Is this the cost of doing business, the children are expendiable just as long as the image of the church isn't tarnished. Shame on the 'pope' and all those who enabled and protected the perps rather than the children !

Amen to this article. It

Amen to this article. It embarasses me as a Catholic that the secular media regularly portrays this loud, angry, arrogant man as some sort of a spokesperson for the Church; a go to guy for the "Catholic" viewpoint. Donahue does not speak for the Church at large. Unlike Donahue, most Catholics do not exist in a perpetual state of egotistical fury over the trivial. The great majority of the alleged incidents of anti-Catholicism the "Catholic" League brings attention to are silly trifles, magnified by the League to near-apocalyptic heights of importance.

Everything you write matches

Everything you write matches my understanding of this cardboard character. And, for all that cardboard, I think he has much more influence over the US bishops than your piece intimates. This screaming, red-faced blowhard on national TV has lots of influence; no one wants to irritate him. No one will shut him up or tell him how much he embarrasses the church.

Guilt by association still works. Easier to cave to Donohue's screeching that confront him with his hot air approach. Somebody needs to make this guy retire. Seems like he has enough of a pension, more than most, so he won't go hungry.

Add Donohue to the current crisis, and the black pot boileth over right into the even blacker kettle.

He sucks all the air out of hope.

He is a fear-monger who takes the low road of intimidation to earn his really big salary.

He is a humorless, joyless man. More the pity. More to pity.

God help us.

PS He doesn't speak for me. Ever.

Why isn't anyone else doing

Why isn't anyone else doing this kind of work?

I've had a lot of issues with the way Mr Donohue does things. I've been frustrated with how he argues and how his brand of jingoistic Catholicism doesn't reflect who I am as a Catholic.

But who else is there? And who else will be covered in the media?

The truth of the matter is that he's probably invited on news programs precisely BECAUSE of his over-the-top personality. It's the same reason we keep getting Christopher Hitchens on news shows. When people like them are on the air, their personalities will take over and it will make for good TV.

Find a more palatable personality and they aren't going to get the same airtime.

And, on the other hand, those critical of Mr Donohue may also be too tolerant of expressions of anti-Catholicism, of remaining quiet when the faith of Catholics is attacked, misrepresented, mocked, and discriminated against in the public square. We've tolerated a lot of this in the name of free-expression and art, ready to defend the sacredness of meta-critical expression over the mystery of God and the Church. Combating this is a matter of justice, worth the time and the effort. To allow attacks on our faith betrays our own sense of sacredness and mystery, something to which we are all called to be witnesses to.

So we have Bill Donohue, a talking head among other boisterous and exaggerated talking heads, speaking out of love for Christ and His Church, a Church that he correctly perceives as often being singled out for insult, who often doesn't speak in an exaggerated style the does not reflects the temperament of most Catholics, but who ironically stands out because of that same style.

Let's see someone do better.

Tom Acemoglu, Your point is

Tom Acemoglu,

Your point is well take about there not being anyone taking his place. But the answer isn't complicated - all it would take is for a couple of Bishops to come out and publicly challenge him.

But they don't say a word.

Tom, you could not be more

Tom, you could not be more right. We need to get rid of him. We don't need a replacement for him. Don't we agree everybody he disagrees with? Why would we need someone to do what he's doing? How could we ever support somebody who attacked the New York Times, The Nation, CBS News, even if that person was somewhat more respectable than Donohue? Donohue's distrust of these leading institutions shows he's no true conservative. He has no respect for Burkean principles.

We do need the bishops to shut him up. They should stop trying to police important civil leaders like Nancy Pelosi, Kathleen Sebelius and Joe Sestak, and take on the true problems. They've got to drop this insincere, useless and already lost "pro-life" crusade and take on the people who actually embarrass us.

Tom, the bishops should listen to you. We have to focus on the real problems.

AMEN!!!

AMEN!!!

He's horrid and shouldn't be

He's horrid and shouldn't be allowed to represent the church in any way.

Thank you, thank you for

Thank you, thank you for finally standing up to this bully. I live in the South where Catholics are in the minority and considered a might satanic. When this Bill Donohue is shown on CNN or other talk shows I realize that my many friends think this is the face of Catholicism and I cringe at the thought.
Until your article I have never heard anyone talk about the buffonary of his talk, so again I say thank you, thank you....

"nearly half of the cases of

"nearly half of the cases of abuse by clergy in the United States involve victims ages 12 or younger" doesn't this mean that more then half were over 12? Thus making Donohue's arguement when he says the most of the problem was a homosexual one?

Your problem is that you

Your problem is that you equate gayness with the abuse and targeting of CHILDREN and teenage minors. Such behavior is equally wrong whether the target is male or female.

Gay men are not any more likely to be predators than heterosexual men are. The only difference is that heterosexual men who prey on middle school age girls aren't considered sexual deviants by the church...just poor slobs who let their natural hormones do their thinking for them.

Ugh. Until the church learns to see homosexuals as individuals rather than as all members of a group that is by nature predatory, we'll never be able to screen candidates for the priesthood effectively. It's a mistake to believe that just kicking out all the gays will solve the problem--or even half the problem. Sexual predators are great deceivers. Our church leaders helped them stay under cover for a long, long time.

The celibacy requirement provided an effective cover for men who knew they were gay when they entered the priesthood but also knew their families would never accept it. Or, for men who had no particular desire to marry, the priesthood may have seemed a logical choice--until later when they realized they were gay.

I'm not saying the celibacy requirement has to go; I'm only saying that the abuse problem is a complex one with many contributing factors. To simply "blame it on the gays" as some conservatives seem bent on doing will only delay the repair and healing of the church.

Nice article. For the record, I am Catholic and Donahue does not speak for me. He gets so much TV exposure because he's good for an entertaining soundbite. Nuanced views do not play well on TV news programs built around 30 second sound bites.

Of course people and the

Of course people and the media listen to a guy like him, it suits their anti Catholic purposes.

Well, there IS another way to

Well, there IS another way to look at this whole idea of a Christian response to very real persecution of the Church. We follow the Master. We let it happen and we suffer it gladly.

The Church probably does not need a PR guy to defend it in the manner of a henchman who is out to break metaphorical legs in a melee with dissenters or adversaries. Would Jesus act like this or would He witness the Spirit with his behavior?

It was so good to see the

It was so good to see the comment by Deacon Ray defending the TV drama "Nothing Sacred". It was a program that depicted the Church in a wonderful way.

I was a member of the Council of Catholic Women when the notice came from the Catholic League encouraging the women to protest the program. Many of them had never seen it, knew nothing about it... but because the Catholic League spoke, they got on the bandwagon at the diocesan level and spread the word.

Wonderful article about a

Wonderful article about a person who is really full of "hot air." I agree with the comments about Mr. Donohue. Too bad he cannot float away into the sky.

It may interest your readers

It may interest your readers to know how this person and his over the top bellowing and demagoguery appear to a non RC Christian like myself. He gives your church a belligerent, defensive and decidedly right-wing image. I get the impression that conservative or "orthodox" RC may find him a bit pugnacious but they take the view that pit bulls are useful at times.

It is always a pleasure to listen to rare TV appearances by John Allen or one of the Jesuits from your "competition", America magazine. No snarling or sneering, but intelligent discussion. Mr. Donahue is a symptom of a larger problem with cable news. They want shouters or as the author of this piece wrote, heat not light. They require soundbites, preferably in 10 seconds or less and their motto is "Dumb it Down". Can you really blame the suits who run cable news? We are a nation where a minority of us have a 4yr. college degree and where many proudly state they never read a book, have never gone to a museum (except on a school field trip) and believe in flying saucers and an earth less than 12 thousand years old. In this milieu Bill the Blowhard fits, as my late father would say, in like Flynn.

Thanks so much for clearly

Thanks so much for clearly articulating this idiot spokesperson...who voted him in anyway?
Also, Kudos to your website...finally a place where I fit in...certainly not the church of Bill...

Predictable article When will

Predictable article

When will some of NCR writers push off the staleness that plagues the content here. Almost without exception, I can fill in the tiresome phrases on almost all of these articles.

Write with the light and joy of Jesus. None of the recent articles reflect faith, hope or charity. It isn't that hard.

Dig a new rut somewhere else.

Spot on! But, as other

Spot on! But, as other respondents have indicated, Feuerherd’s comment that "it plays to the worst stereotypes of triumphalism, homophobia, misogyny and intolerance the church long since abandoned." is less than accurate. With its never ending vituperative invective, the hierarchy daily does violence to homosexuals and women. I've never heard a red hat publically disclaim any statement made by Billy the Bully.
Anonymous

I suspect that precisely

I suspect that precisely because Donahue is so over the top and outrageous that he is invited as an "expert". He fosters anti-catholicism by his approach. I would bet that many non-catholics see him and say "Those Catholics must be crazy". We are being hoisted on our own petard by this loud rude fellow, and it hurts the church.

i don't get the anti

i don't get the anti homosexual stance of the catholic church when so many of their bishops, cardinals priests,nuns are gay..
In fact i remember reading that a high percentage of jesuits and other priests are gay.. i have an old article about how catholic priests and aids.

I think the catholic church is a hypocrit.

have watched Donohue and was embarassed the same as i am embarassed for shaun hannity and rush limbaugh when i hear them..

It is sad to me that these men make their living (millions??) off of trashing. the president, the democrats women , and anyone else who doesnt fit their playbook.
How can anyone believe anything said by anyone who is getting paid to say it or make it up..

Post new comment

NCR Comment code:

  1. Be respectful. Do not attack the writer. Take on the idea, not the messenger.
  2. Use appropriate language. Avoid vulgarities and slurs.
  3. Keep to the point. Deliberate digressions don't aid the discussion.

For more detailed guidelines, visit our User Guidelines page.

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
(if you have one; if not, leave this blank)
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <font> <swf> <swf list>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You may use <swf file="song.mp3"> to display Flash files inline

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This is to prove you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.