Religious leaders denounce Arizona immigration bill

Apr. 22, 2010

WASHINGTON -- Arizona's three bishops and Los Angeles Cardinal Roger M. Mahony have joined those urging Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer to veto legislation that the cardinal called "the country's most retrogressive, mean-spirited and useless anti-immigrant law."

The Arizona Legislature on April 19 sent Brewer a bill that would require police to ask people they encounter in routine activities for immigration documents. It also would, in Arizona at least, make it a crime to be in the country illegally. Federal law considers that a violation of civil codes, not a crime.

The bishops joined in a letter from a dozen religious leaders urging Brewer to veto the bill that they said "may actually scare off potential employers and employees looking to come to Arizona," and threaten public safety by making immigrants afraid to have contact with police, even to report crimes.

It was signed by Bishops Gerald F. Kicanas of Tucson, Thomas J. Olmsted of Phoenix and James S. Wall of Gallup, N.M., whose diocese includes parts of northern Arizona, as well as the Rev. Jan Olav Flaaten, a Lutheran minister who is executive director of the Arizona Ecumenical Council. Also signing the letter were leaders of Arizona Presbyterian, Episcopal, Disciples of Christ, United Church of Christ, Methodist and Jewish organizations.

Brewer had five days to sign or veto the bill. As of April 21 she had not tipped her hand as to her intentions but said April 19 that she had concerns about the bill. She did not elaborate but said she would review the legislation and seek advice about its constitutionality and other aspects, Arizona newspapers reported.

In their letter, the clergy told Brewer they were concerned the bill "could make felons, not only out of dangerous criminals (as is warranted), but also the many undocumented immigrants who have come to this country at a very young age and have no familiarity with any other country but the United States. We are concerned for these children and for families that may have a mother and a father, one of whom is a citizen and the other of whom would now be considered a criminal."

The letter acknowledged that "a veto of this bill would require great political courage on your part. We want you to know, however, that we are willing to stand behind you in taking such an action, so that our state is better served."

Under the headline "Arizona's dreadful anti-immigrant law," Cardinal Mahony wrote on his blog April 18 that "the tragedy of the law is its totally flawed reasoning: that immigrants come to our country to rob, plunder and consume public resources. That is not only false, the premise is nonsense."

Preview NCR's Family Life Issue

Watch this video from NCR Editor Dennis Coday for highlights from our annual Family Life special section.

You won't find these articles on our website. Subscribe now to receive all the content from each biweekly issue.

"What led the Arizona Legislature to pass such a law," he continued, "is so obvious to all of us who have been working for federal comprehensive immigration reform: The present immigration system is completely incapable of balancing our nation's need for labor and the supply of that labor.

"We have built a huge wall along our southern border, and have posted in effect two signs next to each other. One reads, 'No Trespassing,' and the other reads, 'Help Wanted.' The ill-conceived Arizona law does nothing to balance our labor needs," he wrote.

Cardinal Mahony said the bill wrongly assumes that Arizonans, including local law enforcement personnel, "will now shift their total attention to guessing which Latino-looking or foreign-looking person may or may not have proper documents. That's also nonsense."

Federal law does not require immigrants or citizens to carry identification or proof of their legal status at all times.

Various cities and states "have tried such abhorrent tactics over the decades with absolutely no positive effect," the cardinal continued. "Such laws have all been struck down by courts or repealed by wise citizens. Sadly, such laws lead to a new round of immigrant-bashing -- usually in times of economic downturn."

He called for efforts to "bring calm and reasoning to discussions about our immigrant brothers and sisters."

From Arizona and across the nation, civil rights, law enforcement and immigrant-aid organizations denounced the legislation. The president and general counsel of the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund said the organization would sue to stop the law from taking effect if Brewer should sign it.

Some of the support in Arizona for passing the legislation heated up after the late March murder of southern Arizona rancher Robert Krentz, who was shot on his ranch near the Mexican border. No arrest has been made, but police suspect drug traffickers who traverse the border were responsible.

Bishop Kicanas presided at the funeral Mass for Krentz, writing about it on his weekly blog.

He quoted Krentz's wife, Susan, noting that "people who attended the funeral Mass may have come with anger and fear, but I know they left with a powerful message from Susan, 'We cling to forgiveness, demand justice and stand strong in faith.'"

Finally, I am proud of these

Finally, I am proud of these American bishops--they represent all that is good in my church. I hope the bishops in
Colorado join them.

It is and has been against

It is and has been against the law to support "ILLEGAL" immigrants.
Legal immigrants are welcome and should be helped.

Everyone including Cardinals and Bishops must adhere to the law.
The real problem is and has been lack of security at the border by the Federal Government.
I don't hear ultra-liberal Mahoney and others asking for the Federal law to be enforced regarding illegal border crossings - including drug runners and others.

Not only did Mahoney bankrupt his own LA Diocese due to hiding those involved in child abuse; and supports illegals who are bankrupting California, now he is trying to tell other States what to do.

When is Mahoney going to encourage obeying the immigration laws? He can always send money to Mexico to help the poor there. That is justice.

It's sad that the natural

It's sad that the natural consequence of the American bishops making so many stupid comments lately (regarding clerical abuse, women's involvement in the church, gay/lesbian issues, healthcare, etc.) is that when there's an issue that they could actually influence, nobody is interested in what they have to say. As many have said here before me, when they've lost their moral authority, it's simply not possible to selectively regain it.

Perhaps their time would be better spent finding criminal defense attorneys. They're going to need them.

"The ill-conceived Arizona

"The ill-conceived Arizona law does nothing to balance our labor needs," he wrote."

Despite progressive and conservative slogans, the labor needs of the United States are very difficult to define. Thought the U.S. continues to need workers, the sheer numbers of immigrants has collpased wages in the construction, meat packing, and hospitality industries.

The Church has made another

The Church has made another misjudgement. We saw this type of misguided catholicism gone awry with the national health care crisis and now again with illegal immigration. Catholics who cry "SOLIDARITY!" and quote Leviticus 24:22 or Deut. 10:19 (I'm referring to those rare Catholics who actually know their Bible) for the fair treatment and love of the stranger and the foreigner, have perhaps not comprehended the other Church precept of the promotion of the common good. With the support of illegal immigration the Church instead blesses the violation of the sovereignty of our nation and the depression of American workers' wages. It encourages the growth of the most violent gangs in the United States, it blesses driving up black unemployment rates, and leaving the Third World helpless. I suggest the reading of Fr. Patrick Bascio's book, On the Immorality of Illegal Immigration. Immigration is not the problem, it is rather America's greatest gift. Supporting ILLEGAL immigration does NOT support the precepts of catholic morality, nor catholic charity.

Post new comment

NCR Comment code:

  1. Be respectful. Do not attack the writer. Take on the idea, not the messenger.
  2. Use appropriate language. Avoid vulgarities and slurs.
  3. Keep to the point. Deliberate digressions don't aid the discussion.

For more detailed guidelines, visit our User Guidelines page.

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
(if you have one; if not, leave this blank)
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <font> <swf> <swf list>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You may use <swf file="song.mp3"> to display Flash files inline

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This is to prove you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.