Gay group director responds to cardinal's criticisms

New Ways Ministry planning March weekend gathering in Chicago

Feb. 07, 2010
Francis DeBernardo

Francis DeBernardo, executive director of New Ways Ministry, responding to sharp criticisms regarding his organization’s ministries, said the group will continue its bridge-building work between lesbian/gay Catholics and the Catholic church.

His statment came after Chicago Cardinal Francis George unexpectedly isssued a statement Feb. 5 questioning the organization's Catholic identity.

DeBernardo said George's remark “will not impede or slow us in our efforts to work for justice for lesbian/gay people in the church and society.”

The Maryland-based organization defines itself as “a gay-positive ministry of advocacy and justice for lesbian and gay Catholics.” It says it works for “reconciliation within the larger Christian and civil communities.”

“We are astonished that Cardinal George released such a statement, since New Ways Ministry has never been contacted by the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops to discuss the nature of our work. We were not even extended the basic courtesy of being informed of the statement as it was being released to the press. Instead, we learned about it only by reading a press account.

“When dealing with such a sensitive topic as homosexuality, it is not surprising that questions will arise from individual church leaders. Yet, for more than three decades, New Ways Ministry has had its programs reviewed by scores of Catholic bishops, theologians, and pastoral leaders, and we have always been found to be firmly in line with authentic Catholic teaching.

“If the USCCB had concerns about our ministry, why didn’t they contact us before a judgment was made? Why was New Ways Ministry not given an opportunity to explain our positions?

“For almost 33 years New Ways Ministry has been sustained spiritually by the prayers of millions of Catholics, and we owe it to these supporters to continue the work to which God has called us.

In the unexpected statement, George, who is the president of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, denounced New Ways for its criticism of Catholic efforts to defend marriage as the union of one man and one woman and said it does not offer “an authentic interpretation of Catholic teaching.”

George said that since the founding of New Ways Ministry in 1977, “serious questions” have been raised about the group's adherence to church teaching on homosexuality.

“No one should be misled by the claim that New Ways Ministry provides an authentic interpretation of Catholic teaching and an authentic Catholic pastoral practice," George said. “Like other groups that claim to be Catholic but deny central aspects of church teaching, New Ways Ministry has no approval or recognition from the Catholic Church and ... cannot speak on behalf of the Catholic faithful in the United States,” he added.

Preview NCR's Family Life Issue

Watch this video from NCR Editor Dennis Coday for highlights from our annual Family Life special section.

You won't find these articles on our website. Subscribe now to receive all the content from each biweekly issue.

The George remarks might be related to a program New Ways Ministry plans for the Chicago area March 12-14, 2010. The program describes its purpose as following:

-How can Catholic communities respond compassionately and faithfully to the gifts, needs, and life experiences of lesbian/gay people and their families?

-What skills, knowledge, and talents are needed to address lesbian/gay issues in Catholic environments?

-What role can pastoral leaders play in building bridges between faith communities and those who feel alienated and ostracized because of sexual orientation issues?

This weekend of prayer, presentations, dialogue, and planning is designed to assist those seeking ways to include lesbian/gay people and issues in their home parishes, schools, or other ministerial settings.

The New Ways Ministry web site says that staff members DeBernardo and Matthew Myers "will facilitate prayer, presentations, and dialogue throughout the weekend."

New Ways Ministry was co-founded in 1977 by then Notre Dame (now Loretto) Sister Jeannine Gramick and Salvatorian Father Robert Nugent, who were ordered by the Vatican in 1999 to stop their ministry because “ambiguities and errors” in their approach caused confusion for the Catholic people and harmed the church community.

After they continued to speak and write about homosexuality, the two were directed in 2000 not to speak publicly or write about the topic or about the Vatican actions. Nugent accepted the discipline and is in parish ministry. Gramick continues her ministry to gays and lesbians.

Because she defied the Vatican ban and faced expulsion by the School Sisters of Notre Dame, she left the order and joined the Sisters of Loretto in 2001. She made her final vows with her new order in June 2004, and her activities are still associated with New Ways Ministry.

[Catholic News Service contributed to this story.]

Related stories

Speaking truth to power:

Speaking truth to power: Francis DeBernardo, Sr. Jeanine Gramick, and Fr. Robert Nugent. How disheartening it must be to see your own supposed Brothers and Sisters in Christ prefer dogma over love, and doctrine over understanding. They couldn't be more out of line with the teachings of Jesus. God forgive them and continue to give you the grace and courage to continue in your ministry.

Just a couple of quick

Just a couple of quick questions, for the sake of clarity, Examine.

Did the Lord ever, at any point in His public ministry, or at any time in the Gospels, Epistles, or Old Testament, say that homosexual relationships were praiseworthy and morally right?

Did the Lord ever say that it was okay to live your life however you want because, no matter what, even if you commit grave and persistent sin, you will get to Heaven?

Did not the Lord tell the woman caught in adultery that, while He did not condemn her, she nonethess should go and "sin no more"?

Isn't it loving and understanding to tell people the truth, even when it is hard, for the good of their eternal souls (and our own as well), rather than let them live in lies and sin, thereby risking their souls?

Clint, Clint, yes Clint again

Clint, Clint, yes Clint again and as usual condemning people to hell. How comfortable it must feel, Clint, to be so sure of what our Lord said. Yes, Clint, you are the one who knows what the Lord said and what he certainly would have said to gay sinners, sin no more. Yes, Clint, for our sake you instruct us, as you have done so many times. Like your favorite Cardinal George, when you need a head-line "round up the gays."

I did not read any

I did not read any condemnation to hell in Clint's post and Clint simply pointed out that nowhere in the gospels does Jesus say anything to support same sex sexual activity as good. Remember Jesus said He did not come to do away with mosaic law which stated clearly that adultery was forbidden in other words sexual activity outside lawful marriage and the only lawful marriage was between a man and a woman.If Jesus had felt this was too narrow a definition would He not have said something? After all He was not afraid to refuse to participate in the stoning or to cure on the Sabbath?
None of us can condemn another to hell. One day each one of us will meet God in final judgement and He will read our hearts and minds with Perfect Justice and Perfect Love and I have no doubt at all that there will be many same sex attracted people in Heaven because they lived chaste lives despite temptation or because although they failed to maintain chastity at all times they did try to be kind and loving ,were misled into believing it was okay to live a gay lifestyle and had the prayers of devout friends and relatives throughout their lives

Clint, as to count 1 in your

Clint, as to count 1 in your indictment: Jesus constantly and consistently encouraged the brethren to love [never distinguishing as to gender].
Count 2: Jesus only asked for our hearts in relationships to one another and to himself; he despised being a slave to a law and abandoning love in the process.
Count 3: Jesus never advocated sinning; you assume that some forms of love are sinful from the get-go [as the legalists would say "ipso facto"]. Two people deeply committed in love are by nature and by God's grace encouraged to express it. When the woman was caught in adultery, she was just that "caught in adultery"-------there is the sinful behavior [breaking her vowed promise to the committed other]; has nothing to do with gender.
Count 4: absolutely! That is why Jesus severely reprimanded the hierarchs of his day when he told them that they should stop putting onerous burdens on the people when those burdens had nothing to do with love and relationship with our loving God.
Our God is a lover, NOT a lawyer..........we thank Him.

>Did the Lord ever, at any

>Did the Lord ever, at any point in His public ministry, or at any time in the Gospels, Epistles, or Old Testament, say that homosexual relationships were praiseworthy and morally right?

No, but Our Lord never specifically condemned them either.

Such an interesting related

Such an interesting related issue to what you raise, Jason:

Did the Lord ever, at any point in His public ministry, or at any time in the Gospels, Epistles, or Old Testament, say that heterosexual relationships were praiseworthy and morally right?

Hmmmmm...don't really think I can think of any, other than he went to a wedding and sure made sure there was some good wine when asked by his mother to do something...

Just a few answers to Mr.

Just a few answers to Mr. Green's questions:

a. Did Jesus ever say homosexual relationships are wrong?

b. No, but what do same-sex relationships have to do with "grave and
persistent sin"?

c. Yes, but Jesus also told his listeners to forgive indefinitely.

d. Maybe, maybe not.

In light of a few other

In light of a few other comments, I should remind Mr. Green that the Son of God was the epitome of forgiveness. Jesus, indeed, encouraged his followers to forgive indefinitely! The Lord forgave his executioners, no less!

If we are made in the image and likeness of God, might not this belief suggest --- if not denote --- that God gives each of us the capacity to forgive indefinitely, no matter how difficult such a task may appear at the outset? Psychology suggests that the act of forgiving primarily benefits the one forgiving, not the one forgiven. Talk about a God-given aid to better health!

If God is Love, where is damnation in light of Jesus' request and example that we forgive without limit?

Whenever I see fundamentalist portrayal of a judging and condemning God, I'm reminded of the phrase "...and Jesus wept..."

Did he ever say they were

Did he ever say they were morally wrong. As I have studied the Gospels, it appears that Christ is mute on the subject.

Just a quick comment to

Just a quick comment to defend Jesus, Clint.

Wasn't his ministry an example of meeting people where they were and showing them unconditional love?

Didn't Jesus empahsize the importance of love and never once say anything about the mechanics of that love?

Didn't Jesus have a beloved who was not of the same gender as himself.

It's accepting people for who they are, and not passing judgement on them because who they are scares you a lot better way for you to live out your Christian faith than waisting your time hating sin.

If you don't hate sin what is

If you don't hate sin what is the alternative-to embrace it and pretend it is not sin?
We must hate sin because sin diminshes our capacity to love God who deserves our love.
Hating sin is not a negative life draining preoccupation but simply an awareness of how limited and ugly we make ourselves by choosing the dark over the light.
Every time we overcome sin we grow in our capacity to love.

Hating (sin)? Is that your

Hating (sin)? Is that your definition of the Church of Jesus Christ, Son of God?

Hatred through the ages, be it against the Jews - Jesus own people, the Muslims who today hate us in return for the crusades in which 10s of millions were murdered "with Cross in one hand and sword in the other, the Christian hordes came and laid waste to our land, our cities, our families.....

No wonder these people hate us in return.

If this is the church of Jesus, speaking about "Hate", then it, and all who do so, deserve to be excommunicated. And when you look at it, it will be not the people who will be excommunicated, but possibly the church itself.

An expected knee-jerk

An expected knee-jerk reaction to the word "hate".

Mr. James, no one said anything about hating individuals or groups of people. The statement was that we "hate sin" -- we oppose sin, we fight sin, we close the doors to sin. We do not hate the sinner; if we did, we would hate ourselves because every single person who lives, ever has lived, and ever will live (with the exception of the Blessed Virgin Mary, and Our Lord Jesus Christ, Who was "a man like us in all things but sin", of course) is a sinner. We have all fallen far short of the glory of God.

But, that is not to say that we embrace or even tolerate sin. Just because I am a sinner does not mean that I should tolerate sin in others. No. If I truly am Christian, then I have the duel obligation to address and repent of my sin, and strive to do better, while at the same time helping those around me, in a spirit of fraternal correction, to address and repent of their sins. To help others while not addressing my own makes me a hypocrite; to address my own and care nothing for others is the sin of omission.

I do hate sin, but I love the sinner. I hate sin because it is the means by which I separate myself from the grace and love of my God. I hate sin because it hurts me, those I love, those around me, the Church and the world. I hate sin because it is nothing short of the selfishness of me and all mankind opposed to the love of God. I do not tolerate sin, I do not support sin, I do not encourage sin.

Christ is the exemplar of this. He hated sin, but desperately loved the sinner, loved the sinner so much that He chose to die for all of us, me being the first. How can I do any less?

Stephen the point was we

Stephen the point was we should all hate sin but we must never hate people or fail to love them as ourselves Hate is the opposite of love. Sin reduces your capacity to love. Therefore it is logical to hate sin because it diminshes your capacity to love. The alternative would be to love sin which I am sure you would never advocate!

Jesus' love was pure same sex

Jesus' love was pure same sex atracted people can love chastely with the help of God's grace.

Chastity as you describe it

Chastity as you describe it is heroic. Heroism cannot be required under natural law morality.

Just a couple of quick

Just a couple of quick questions, for the sake of clarity, Examine.

Did the Lord ever, at any point in His public ministry, or at any time in the Gospels, Epistles, or Old Testament, say that homosexual/lesbian relationships were to be subject to condemnation? How did the teaching about sexual orientation from the 1969 Catholic Catechism become so militant and judgmental?

Didn’t the Lord say that we were to live our lives to the full, including living free of judgment and condemnation? Did the Lord actually ever deny anyone heaven?

While the Lord did indeed tell the woman caught in adultery that He did not condemn her it is important to note that He did firstly invite her accusers to cast the first stone?

Isn't it loving and understanding and bringing healing more important than condemning our limited perceptions of other people’s supposed shortcomings? How and when did it become acceptable to judge when Jesus clearly warned us against that? When and how did eternal souls become vulnerable to human scrutiny?
1

Did the Lord ever say that

Did the Lord ever say that being homosexual was "intrinsically disordered"? On the other hand, did He not say "Stop judging and you will not be judged. Stop condemning and you will not be condemned". Luke 6:37 (For the sake of clarity.)

The catechism was drawn up by

The catechism was drawn up by the Magisterium to set out Christ's teaching to help the members of Christ's mystical body. Whether we follow that teaching is up to us.
We will not be beheaded or given a thousand lashes if we do not follow the Church's advice on how to live and the Church leaves final judgement to God who alone can read our hearts and minds.
What God has put together let no man put asunder. God created the male and female body to fit together.Same sex couplings go against this design in other words man has put asunder this coupling.It is simple logic.

Mr. Green, I am so happy my

Mr. Green, I am so happy my God is a God of love, compassion and mercy. I am sorry to hear your God is such a judgmental and condemning God. The Good News of Jesus, in part was about his message of what a wonderful God we have. Remember also that Jesus came to change the Old Testament’s ideas of a judgmental and punishing God. Then Jesus left us one commandment, (notice it is only ONE and not all the TEN that had been already violated. Only one this time), TO LOVE ONE ANOTHER, as HE loved us….without any interest or conditions…. God loves you with an incomparable and unconditional love and nothing can change that fact. Saint Augustine said that everything that exists exists in the love of God and that which is not love by God does not exists. Isn’t wonderful to know that ALL that exists is because God LOVES US? I think it is awesome. Cheer up Mr. Green!

Joana, if you believe in a

Joana, if you believe in a God who does not care what we do, Who lets us do whatever we want, whenever we want to, without any concern for how our actions affect ourselves and others, then you do not believe in a God of love. You believe in a God of license, and the God you believe in is not the God of Abraham, Isaac, Jacob and Jesus.

You say that your God is a "God of love, compassion and mercy". But, it seems as if you have forgotten that God is also a God who has given us the Law, and that Jesus said, "Do not think that I came to destroy the Law or the Prophets. I did not come to destroy but to fulfill. 18 For assuredly, I say to you, till heaven and earth pass away, one jot or one tittle will by no means pass from the law till all is fulfilled" (Matthew 5: 17-18). In other words, Jesus did not come to take away the Law.

In addition, parents demonstrate their love by setting boundaries for their children. They are not being judgmental or condemning when they do this, but rather loving. They want the best for their children (which is the definition of love) and so want to protect them. This is what God does for us, He gives us boundaries and sets limits because He loves us and knows that we, at times, make decisions that are incorrect, even dangerous, for us. In setting those limits, He demonstrates His great love. If He did not love us, He would not care what we did or how we lived.
Children show their love for their parents by obeying their rules. We, in turn, demonstrate our love for God by obeying His reasonable commands and constraining our behavior to within the boundaries that He has set.

There is a wrong-headed tendency in our society to believe that love means letting someone do whatever he or she wants to and then telling that person that what he or she has done is just great, and, if there are negative consequences, blaming an overly strict and unloving and uncompassionate society for the consequences. This is not love, it is license. God does not grant us license, He gives us His immeasurable love. I would much rather have the latter, even if it means that I sometimes cannot do everything I want to do, than to have the former.

Consider, Clint: from the

Consider, Clint: from the book "That Man is You" by Fr. Louis Evely:

"All the dead had gathered outside the gates of Heaven, hoping to enter, when the rumor began to spread that Jesus was going to forgive everyone, and let everyone into heaven. The "good" began to murmur, 'That isn't fair, that isn't right, we worked so hard to be good!' At that very moment they were condemned to Hell because LOVE had appeared, and they refused to accept it."

Clint, did you notice the

Clint, did you notice the words of Cardinal George? “No one should be misled by the claim that New Ways Ministry provides an authentic interpretation of Catholic teaching and an authentic Catholic pastoral practice,"
Cardinal George, among many others, believes that the members of the clergy are the only ones who can provide an authentic interpretation of Catholic teaching. A position they have usurped within the Church for centuries now. They seem to thereby claim an exclusive access to the life of the Holy Spirit within the Church.
The Holy Spirit works where it chooses and within those who open their minds and lives to its inspiration. The clerical hierarchy does not have exclusive access to the wisdom of the Spirit. It is very credible that it may inspire to give a proper interpretation in this matter to New Ways Ministry and other lay people within the Mystical Body. The Cardinal, and others, should learn to listen.

Lets not create false

Lets not create false oppositions. Christian dogma is not contrary to love. Church doctrine is not contradicted by understanding. We can maintain Catholic moral principles regarding sexuality and Catholic doctrinal teaching regarding sacramental marriage and at the same time love our brothers and sisters who struggle with homosexual feelings. I just wish Francis DeBernardo was not so disingenuous with his statements to NCR trying to appear so surprised that the Church might oppose New Ways. I encourage everyone to go to the New Ways website and look at just one of their news letters. No matter what you think of the issue, I think one must at least admit that is NOT compatible with Church teaching...the Cardinal does have a job to do, after all.

"...our brothers and sisters

"...our brothers and sisters who struggle with homosexual feelings..."

As a single, divorced, white male, I still "struggle" with heterosexual feelings.

Why? Because God gave me a heterosexual orientation. It's not something I chose.

As for behaviors, well, that's been at times another thing :)

And, yet, Jesus wants us to forgive indefinitely, without limit, just as he did on the cross.

If forgiving is good for God, we can only rationally conclude that it's good for us, too! The Son of God apparently took into account our fallible human nature.

JPII once said that we create our own hells: We can, indeed, be our own worst enemy.

"Why? Because God gave me a

"Why? Because God gave me a heterosexual orientation. It's not something I chose."

So, God did that to you. Thusly, you suggest God gave others their homosexual orientation. It's not something they chose either. So much for God and choice. So much for what God hath wrought. Does God love its created orientations, all of them.

Ray, it has been my

Ray, it has been my consistent experience in my clinical work that it is not the homosexual persons who are stuggling with homosexuality: it is all of those who are trapped by their own bigotry and oppressive attitudes who struggle with it.

Would you also say it is not

Would you also say it is not the adulterous person who is struggling with adultery but the faithful spouse trapped by her own absurd expectations of fidelity?
Or it is not the pedophile who struggles with pedophilia but the bigots who fail to understand his/her "love"?

Although No Consistency's

Although No Consistency's examples may seem extreme, I think there is a good point here. Just because someone who is living a disordered lifestyle does not feel its burdens at the moment does not negate the fact that the lifestyle disordered. That it affects others first is no surprise.

Much of what you have said is

Much of what you have said is true. However, just to set the record straight, no pun intended, I don't think any of us are going against church "dogma" by advocating for same-sex civil marriage. On the other hand, we certainly are going against the current thought and teaching of many of our church's leaders. That might mean we're going against church doctrine, if doctrine is defined as current teachings of the majority of our leaders.
Nevertheless, we shall all be judged by God, and I have no doubt that God would not bar me from heaven because I wish to extend to the homosexuals the right to civil marriage. Sadly, if I'm wrong or right, I will probably find out well ahead of any change in the church's current campaign against our homosexual brothers and sisters.

For people who experience

For people who experience same sex attraction I suggest they contact the organisation called Courage for love and support in their life journey

For a church that demands

For a church that demands Don't Ask Don't Tell as it's official statement of policy, Courage is entirely misnamed. It should be called Craven.

If courage is facing up to

If courage is facing up to the Truth without running away from it or trying to change it into something that allows one to live a lie then every member of Courage have that quality in bucketloads and are the saints of our time. To live out same sex attraction is to live a lie. To remain chaste is to be pure of heart and trust God knows what He is about. The sexual gift is consummated between a man and a woman God did not design for consummation between 2 males or 2 females. It is His Design.Why some souls have the temptation to act outside that design is a mystery but all temptation to act outside God's design should be resisted and with the help of God's love can be.

Jesus promised His Truth

Jesus promised His Truth would last till end times and that the Holy Spirit would ensure that His Beloved Church would teach that Truth.
Sometimes Truth hurts but it always is Love.
If you see a child begin to eat a beautifully coloured sweet smelling lolly wrapped in a gorgeous wrapping would you not warn the child that what they were being offered was in fact not what it seemed? The Cardinal is simply warning people that this group are not teaching in the name of the Church or of its Christ

Cardinal George's unfortunate

Cardinal George's unfortunate statement questioning the Catholic bona fides of New Ways Ministry is just one more example of the increasingly desperate attempts of the Roman hierarchy to silence and marginalize gay and lesbian Catholics. One wonders what sort of demons must be behind these repeated and almost hysterical attacks. Sadly, the cardinal and his fellow bishops are gradually painting themselves into a corner and bringing opprobrium upon the Church, not to mention denigrating and binding heavy burdens upon a large number of their own faithful.

As a man who has worked for

As a man who has worked for some 29 years in a pastoral role among my homosexual brothers and sisters and later in clinical work with people affected by HIV-AIDS, let me say that it is my experience that the unfortunate statements made by Cardinal George and other Church leaders is doing vastly more harm to the Church than anything New Ways Ministry could possibly have done. And this is not to mention the harm and suffering it is causing gay and lesbian Catholics to this day. It is monstrous.

James Lodwick, you wrote "One

James Lodwick, you wrote "One wonders what sort of demons must be behind these repeated and almost hysterical attacks." imo, what is immediately behind them and causing the increasing stridency and vehemence, was the hierarchy's irrational decision sometime in the past few years to blame their clerical pederasty outrages on homosexuality. Scapegoating. Witch-burning. Very primitive stuff.

To point out that a group

To point out that a group that a group is making statements that go against the teachings of the Church is not hysteria but pointing out a fact. It might be a fact that some people do not wish to hear but it remains a fact.

But it seems to me that it is

But it seems to me that it is the teaching of the Church in this matter that is being questioned.

Cardinal George is a really

Cardinal George is a really nice guy. He just has to regularly denigrate ministry to Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual and Transsexual Persons clearly and in print so that the Holy Father can read it and know that Cardinal George is on board with the Vatican's policies. You cannot blame Cardinal George for trying to secure his ecclesiastical future, can you?

"Cardinal George's

"Cardinal George's unfortunate statement questioning the Catholic bona fides of New Ways Ministry is just one more example of the increasingly desperate attempts of the Roman hierarchy to silence and marginalize gay and lesbian Catholics. One wonders what sort of demons must be behind these repeated and almost hysterical attacks. Sadly, the cardinal and his fellow bishops are gradually painting themselves into a corner and bringing opprobrium upon the Church, not to mention denigrating and binding heavy burdens upon a large number of their own faithful." Quote

Yes, this is true. So many of my friends no longer attend or contribute to the church. Instead of Christian Love, we find the church driving a hatred of the many wonderful gay people I know, Catholic and of other faiths.

The church seems to be "circling the wagons". Instead of admitting it has failed re His Teachings, most notably the hatred of the Jews in times past, it has instead found a new group to denigrate and hate. With totally sly, but on second reflection, comments of condemnation that appear to the many Godless people among us, to license violence against gay people.

God will Judge. And he will see through the obfuscations to the meanness of the church run by Benedict. And God will Judge. And we can only pray that before it is too late, the cardinals and bishops wake up. Or its going to be ugly.

And am I not right that all the church sexual abuse, in the USA, Ireland, italy also, the church attempted to blame gay priests. But the Bishops own multimillion $$ report on the endless violations of the children it is sworn to protect, showed that gay prists were no more likely then str8 priests, to commit vile crimes on the children, our most precious.

If the church does not come to its senses, fully admit its crimes, including falsely accusing our gay brothers and sisters in Christ, and admitting the church's culpability, there will no longer be a Catholic church.

And perhaps Jesus will no longer have to weep for the crimes committed in HIS Namne.

Here is a perfect example of

Here is a perfect example of RCC actual NO-public- debate policy. Look how silencing tactics are used to shut down any real public debate. The two founders, Father Nugent and Sister Gramick are ordered to not speak or write about homosexuality and the Vatican actions.

The same silencing tactics are used against brilliant forward-thinking theologians too , such as Hans Kung.

Closeted, secretive homosexual clergy is tolerated. The pope tolerated decades of abuse by pedophile clergy as long as it was kept 'hidden'. He cared not at all for thousands of victims of heterosexual and homosexual pedophile priests.

It is better to marry than to burn wrote st. Paul. Marriage is holy too and should be allowed for both homosexual couples and heterosexual couples. God makes them both. Abuse of children and youths is not acceptable. Adults should be allowed to marry. Mercy, justice for all. We are all community. We are all children of God. Homosexuals exist in all species since time began. No discrimination comes from Christ. He welcomed the Ethopian eunach and did not cast him out as 'deficient' or 'disordered.'

The western world has limited

The western world has limited marriage to one man and one woman since time of Roman Republic even before Christ. While it wrong to judge and anyone can repent, but at the same it wrong to approve of sin and say in is ok. What is next allowing one Man to have several wives as in the Middle East, or one woman to have several husbands as some parts of Asia? As you see in 1 Corinthians 6 9 thru 17 9Do you not know that the wicked will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: Neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor male prostitutes nor homosexual offenders 10nor thieves nor the greedy nor drunkards nor slanderers nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God. 11And that is what some of you were. But you were washed, you were sanctified, you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and by the Spirit of our God. 12"Everything is permissible for me"?but not everything is beneficial. "Everything is permissible for me"?but I will not be mastered by anything. 13"Food for the stomach and the stomach for food"?but God will destroy them both. The body is not meant for sexual immorality, but for the Lord, and the Lord for the body. 14By his power God raised the Lord from the dead, and he will raise us also. 15Do you not know that your bodies are members of Christ himself? Shall I then take the members of Christ and unite them with a prostitute? Never! 16Do you not know that he who unites himself with a prostitute is one with her in body? For it is said, "The two will become one flesh." 17But he who unites himself with the Lord is one with him in spirit.

"The western world has

"The western world has limited marriage to one man and one woman since time of Roman Republic even before Christ."

Using your logic, we need to reinstate slavery as a bona fide human practice in the western world.

I think it was God that

I think it was God that started the whole one man one woman thing with Adam and Eve!
As for slavery the world has always wanted to have it but it has never been part of Jesus' teaching we are all free men in Catholicism it just took the world a long time to catch up to us.

The sexually immoral,

The sexually immoral, idolaters, adulterers, male prostitutes, thieves, the greedy, drunkards, slanderers and swindlers all have the right to a civil marriage. So, exactly why should our state governments discriminate against the “homosexual offenders”? The church should marry whomever it pleases according to its understanding of God's law. Likewise, state governments should create civil marriage for their citizens as they deem appropriate.
In the end, God will decide which souls will be let into heaven. I daresay there will be a number of clergy left at the gates.

"In the end, God will decide

"In the end, God will decide which souls will be let into heaven. I daresay there will be a number of clergy left at the gates."

On the contrary, I suspect God will allow these fundamentalist/reactionary/"orthodox" clergy INTO heaven --- just to demonstrate the unconditional love that these sorry clergy refused to show others (LGBTs) deemed "disordered" by Rome.

I trust God will surprise these fellas. I just hope they don't get pissed off at their Creator's generosity of spirit and action at the Pearly Gates!

You are correct many sinners

You are correct many sinners may not get into heaven reguardless of there position in life; But it is not discrimination for only one man and one woman marriage to exist. Everyone is free to marry someone of the opposite sex. By your logic the state should allow civil marriage for one man to marry several woman, or one woman to marry several men, or groups of people to marry each other just because some people want the right to do it.

Marriage is a union between a

Marriage is a union between a man and a woman. Same sex unions are not marriages. They are the union of people of the same gender.The state does not have to change anything and they would be very foolish to do so.There is enough sadness and damage when marriages break down and end in divorce.Let us not add yet another human error to the mix.

Marriages are about how the

Marriages are about how the couple relates to society. Same sex couples have a right to be treated with the same respect as married heterosexual couples unless there is a compelling reason to treat them otherwise. Fertility is not such a reason, since hetro marriages do not face such a condition (even in canon law). Indeed, since Lawrence v. Texas, the morality of the associated sexual act can no longer be used to justify different treatment. All that remains in animosity, and that is not a justifiable reason. Anyone who has watched reports coming out of the Proposition 8 trial knows that state prohibitions on gay marriage will not last the year.

Legally, yes marriages are

Legally, yes marriages are about how the couple relates to society. This begs the question, why cannot Christian principles prevail in an overwhelmingly Christian society? Would seem logical.

Jesus clearly warned us not

Jesus clearly warned us not to pronounce judgment on anyone. This allows Catholics to embrace the Rite or Sacrament of Reconciliation individually knowing that it is held under an oath of total confidentiality through the celebrant.

The question of same-sex marriage and perhaps all of our other concerns about what or where people are going wrong, should be of little concern to us as individuals, as long as we believe that were are following God's will ourselves. Furthermore, if we truly believe in God's unconditional love these questions could be more compassionately centered to minister to others rather than to condemn. Only this path can lead us to transformation.

For still another view on this matter you are invited to visit: http://whenreligionfails.blogspot.com/search/label/fear%20of%20God

Hans Kung,Father Nugent or

Hans Kung,Father Nugent or Sisier Grammick are free to speak as loudly and often as they want their tongues won't be removed but they do not have the right to claim their ideas and opinions are the Truth of the Catholic Church they are not free to pretend any longer that they speak for the Church and if they really believe they must continue to speak out the honest thing to do is follow Henry the 8th, Luther, Calvin, etcetera and leave to establish their own church.

Bridge-building? The Bridge

Bridge-building? The Bridge is already there. New Ways simple has to get on it. The problem is that instead of getting on the bridge they want to build their own bridge or tunnel.

Amen and well said. The

Amen and well said. The Bridge is Christ and we can either follow His teachings and cross over into eternal life, or we can ignore His teachings, live as we want to, and risk the eternal loss of Heaven. It is a simple choice.

Clint, the problem is: Are

Clint, the problem is: Are these teachings we are getting from Rome really the teachings of Christ? I think not. They are divisive and hateful.

Yes the bridge is Christ but

Yes the bridge is Christ but many of our brothers and sisters do not realise this and do need our prayers and the help of Courage to help them on their spiritual journey

Mr. DeBernardo is

Mr. DeBernardo is "astonished" that Francis Cardinal George would issue such a statement without giving his organization a chance to "explain our positions". He then proceeds to say that this selfsame org. has been in existence for 33 years and has been "sustained... by the prayers of millions...". Does Mr. DeBernado really believe that His Eminence and the USCCB have no idea of the organization's philosophy after being known by so many for so long? Then he immediately proceeds to state that "for more than three decades, New Ways Ministry" has been "reviewed by scores of Catholic bishops, theologians, and pastoral leaders". There seems to be an evident contradiction.

What is it exactly that is up

What is it exactly that is up for debate? The homosexual act has always, is, and will always be morally repulsive. The Church rightfully decrees its sinful nature. The loving action of Jesus allows ALL sinners to repent and be forgiven. We need to stop putting people into a category based on thier sinful failings. We are all God's creation. It is not our sins that divide us from each other, but our sins alienate us from God. Christ redeems our fallen nature IF WE REPENT!

This is where, I am sorry to

This is where, I am sorry to say to you, Tom, you're wrong. Some people have used the Bible to defend unconscionably un-Christlike behavior toward gays and lesbians, just as they once used it to defend slavery! We came to recognize how wrong we were about slavery, and one day, we will come to that realization about the Church's shameful discrimination against gays and lesbians. God created gay and lesbian people just the same as God created me and you, Tom. How can it be sinful to act in concert with God's creation?

As a Church, we will one day apologize and atone for our behavior. I am one voice within the Church praying and acting to make that day happen sooner than later. So is New Life Ministries. So is Dignity. So is Call to Action. There are many of us, and we are Church. Do not dare to say we are not Church, for you do not know what you say.

I will pray for you, Tom, and all others like you.

I think you are sadly

I think you are sadly mistaken if you think the Church can one day say homosexual acts are sinful and then the next day say they are not. For if that were to happen what other teaching would be changed next? God also created mass murderers and child molesters, that does not mean their actions are moral. Your statement that God created homosexuals so therefore their actions are moral is absurd and undefendable. I am just as big a sinner as the next. The only difference between you and me is I do not call my immoral actions moral. I confess my sins in the confessional, I do not march down Main Street wearing my sins as a badge of pride. For the sake of your immortal soul, repent. Hell is forever, why take a chance. Stick with Church teaching and you will be saved. Defy Church teaching and you place yourself outside. PS-- the Church never taught that slavery was either moral or immoral.

God created the human body to

God created the human body to accomodate love making between a male and a female. If He had wanted same sex attracted people to make love He would have altered the body design to accomodate this but He did not.
There are physical side effects from sexual activity outside the monogonmous norm of a marriage which the ever rising rates of sexually transmitted diseases attest to.
Our fallen natures mean we are all prone to temptation.To be same sex attracted is a particularly difficult form of temptation and I firmly believe that any soul tempted in this way who lives a celibate lifestyle is a great saint because the world constantly urges them to indulge in the lifestyle.
We must all try to be pure of heart .There is no discrimination against same sex attracted people in the Church. Every Catholic is called upon to be chaste until they enter into the sacrament of marriage. I am a single female I am called to be chaste it is irrelevant whether I am attracted to men, women or both I am called to be pure of heart and to forgo sex until I ever find it to be God's will that I enter into the married state.

God knows God must get sick

God knows God must get sick and tired of all those who, God knows, know more about what God knows than God Himself knows.

The whole Judaeo/Christian/Islamic teaching on sexuality is without any scientific or moral foundation whatsoever. The only issue around sexuality that seemed to excite Jesus was Divorce, and, I suspect, this was because of his concern for the proper treatment of women.

Yes, St. Paul, that great case study for psychoanalysts everywhere, does have a few things to say about homosexual acts, but one should be very wary of reading him out of his historical and social context.

Always remember that great contemporary of Jesus, Rabbi Hillel, who, when challenged by some smart buckos to recite the Torah while standing on one leg accepted the challenge, stood on one leg and said: 'Love the Lord your God, and do nothing to your neighbour which is repugnant to yourself. That is Torah. The rest is commentary!'

I am sorry Catherine I know

I am sorry Catherine I know your heart is in the right place and you are sincere in your concern but if you follow your logic we should accept the premise of pedophiles who claim they are acting out of instincts of love or the adulterer who tells his extra mistress that he /she is acting out of love.
God did not create homosexuality just as He did not create adultery or pedophilia They are human acts of volition to misuse the God given gift of sexuality outside of its natural God created context which is the coupling of a man and a woman with the natural consequence of the sexual act usually being a new life.In some cases this does not occur. Some couples find themselves unable to have children and they know for some reason God has different plans for them perhaps adoption or working in professions that care for children.We have become so immersed in the world's view of sexual activity as a recreational right and need we have lost our understanding of it as part of God's Creation and gift.
Why so some souls struggle with same sex attraction? Partly because our society has encouraged people to indulge their sexual appetite and the only "crime" in secular culture is to not prevent the natural consequence of sexual activity by making sure you use contraceptives or condoms.
Any appetite if indulged grows hence the sad spectacle of sexual addiction in some souls.
Yes homosexual behaviour has existed since the beginning of time because we are born into original sin and have a fallen nature. However it is a weak love that tells someone with same sex attraction that the only way they will be happy is to live the lifestyle It is the same as telling an alcoholic that the only way they will find peace and fulfillment is to drink alcohol.
Jesus never abandons any one of his sheep He knows a same sex attracted soul needs grace to help them stay chaste and He will provide that grace in abundance and they are capable of becoming great saints whose heroic virtue in maintaining chastity will bring much needed grace and strength into the Mystical Body of Christ which is so sorely wounded at present.
Our same sex attracted brothers and sisters in Christ need our prayers and love so that they can develop the strength to see they can reject the lifestyle without feeling unworthy .We are all sinners in need of God's mercy and love.

You are wrong. Homosexuality

You are wrong. Homosexuality is a natural God given God created sexual preference. Ancient Biblical worldviews, dark age science, and outright prejudice, that informs the RCC position does not compare with what we know today. Modern science both qualitatively and quantitatively refutes the church's position that homosexuality is not a natural orientation and preference.

If Jesus was a shepherd He knew as do modern day sheperds know, sheep, ewes and rams in a herd, universally express ac/dc orientations.
Jesus the shepherd would only discourage that kind of behavior for economic reasons ie taking a greater number of lambs to market. More lambs = more profitability for the shepherd. So too is it more profitable for the RCC to have a generous crop of new cradle catholcs.
When it comes to real people Jesus gave no indication about homosexuality per se save we are not to judge one another, we are to love our enemies, and gather in.
The mystical body of Christ has been wounded for a long long time. Those who have been and are perpetrating that wound are now noticing a feeling of woundedness themselves. Perhaps this is because the tables are turning on them. The oppressed are standing up to prejudicial and unfounded judgmentalism where they find it. Most of it is found, sad to say, in religiously conservative circles.

Blessed are the pure of heart

Blessed are the pure of heart for they shall see God

Tom, as a human being and

Tom, as a human being and presumably a Christian, how can you say that an act of love "will always be morally repulsive"! Then you go on to write "The Church rightfully decrees its sinful nature"; how can a true act of love be of "sinful nature"? Finally, you talk about "we are all God's creation" and "the loving action of Jesus". From where I stand, none of your later comments and nothing from Jesus would condemn an act of love, be it heterosexual or homosexual. To be clear, no one is talking about promiscuous sex, but rather love between two committed individuals; this is what is usually referred to as marriage. However, some among us get all bent out of shape when the genitals don't match up with their preconceived notions. I believe that God looks at our hearts, not at our genitals! Try to think beyond what you memorized. God bless you.

It is not I who says that a

It is not I who says that a homosexual act is immoral. The Church says it. If I made up the rules, there would be no rules and we would all get to heaven no matter what we did or didn't do. But I did not make up the rules, God did. And He says, through Holy Mother Church, that homosexual acts are immoral and heterosexual acts outside of the bonds of marraige are immoral, and the use of contraception immoral. You ask how can a true act of love be sinful? Simple, a homosexual act has no chance of procreation and therefore can never cooperate in God creative nature. That is why the homosexual act is called a sin against nature and an abomination. Again, not me talking, but the Church. So if you have a problem with it, take it up with the Magisterium. Believe me, I came from where you are. I used to rationalize my sins away all the time. You will find much peace when you accept the Churches teachings (all of them) even though they are extremely difficult to obey and live. I fail constantly.

That's funny Tom. I've spent

That's funny Tom. I've spent a lot of my life trying to deal with the rationalizations called Church teaching. I failed constantly,

Post new comment

NCR Comment code:

  1. Be respectful. Do not attack the writer. Take on the idea, not the messenger.
  2. Use appropriate language. Avoid vulgarities and slurs.
  3. Keep to the point. Deliberate digressions don't aid the discussion.

For more detailed guidelines, visit our User Guidelines page.

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
(if you have one; if not, leave this blank)
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <font> <swf> <swf list>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You may use <swf file="song.mp3"> to display Flash files inline

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This is to prove you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.