NCR on Kindle - NCR classifieds - YouTube - Twitter - Facebook - Email Alerts - RSS
How Fr. Maciel built his empire
Mexico City: the flashpoint in the deepening Legion scandal
Apr. 12, 2010
Second of Two Parts
Rome in 1946, following World War II, was in an economic shambles when an obscure young priest with deep pockets arrived seeking meetings with Vatican officials. The scion of a provincial Mexican aristocracy, Marcial Maciel Degollado had been a priest only two years, yet when a cameraman filmed his ordination he was already leading his own religious order, the Legion of Christ.
Maciel had gone to Rome by way of Madrid, Spain, where he sought scholarships the Franco government had offered for Latin American seminarians to study in Spain. The Spanish foreign minister, Alberto Martín Artajo, told him he needed Vatican approval for the "apostolic schoolboys" back home to qualify.
With funds from several of Mexico's wealthiest families and its president, Miguel Alemán Valdés, he wrangled a meeting with Clemente Micara, a newly named cardinal and veteran papal diplomat. Micara, 67, was obsessed with rebuilding Rome. Maciel, tall and lean with fair brown hair and searchlight eyes, spoke no Italian, but Micara spoke Spanish. Maciel gave Micara $10,000, "a huge sum in a city reeling from the war," said a knowledgeable priest.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Related story, April 13: Commissioner likely to oversee Legion of Christ
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Legion of Christ: A History, dictated by Maciel and published by a Legion imprint in 2004, doesn't mention the payment to Micara, but the book says that Maciel traveled with "a confidential document and a sum of money" from Mexico's papal nuncio for delivery to Cardinal Nicola Canali, the governor of the Vatican city-state. The two cardinals helped Maciel gain an audience with Pope Pius XII, who proved sympathetic. Maciel went back to Madrid with letters of approval. In August 1946, Maciel and 34 apostolic schoolboys from Mexico sailed to Spain.
Why would the Holy See, with established channels to transmit documents, entrust sensitive material to a priest without diplomatic passport? The other part of the story — "a sum of money" — was the shape of things to come.
Maciel forced all Legionaries to take private vows, never to speak ill of Maciel or any superiors, and to report to their superiors anyone who did. The vows ensured his cult of personality. Juan Vaca and seven other early victims of Maciel who first spoke publicly, in the 1997 Hartford Courant report by Gerald Renner and this writer, gave graphic accounts of how, in Spain and Rome in the 1950s, they watched Maciel inject himself with a morphine painkiller called dolantin, as the drug was called at the time. In 1956, a strung-out Maciel entered Salvator Mundi Hospital in Rome. Cardinal Valerio Valeri, a reed-like former diplomat and prefect for Congregation of Religious, was furious over letters from an older seminarian in Mexico City who had seen Maciel self-inject and worried about his overly affectionate behavior with boys. The priest who ran the Legion high school was also concerned about Maciel's drug use and advances on youths. Valeri suspended Maciel and arranged for Carmelite priests to assume control of the Legion house. They began questioning the boys, who admitted years later how they lied to protect him, and themselves. "We didn't know what to do," Vaca, now a psychology professor in New York, reflected. "Our lives would have ended." They feared the investigating priests would deem them sinners.
Preview NCR's Family Life Issue
Watch this video from NCR Editor Dennis Coday for highlights from our annual Family Life special section.

You won't find these articles on our website. Subscribe now to receive all the content from each biweekly issue.
Valeri did not publicize Maciel's suspension. Maciel traveled between Spain and Latin America, raising money for a big project underway in Rome: Our Lady of Guadalupe Basilica. Maciel got his break in 1959 when Pius XII died. Micara, by then the vicar of Rome, signed an order reinstating Maciel — something for which, in the interregnum between popes, he had no authority to do. Canon law puts official duties in abeyance in the interim. What were Valeri and other officials who were offended by Maciel to do? Expend what capital they had with the new pontiff, challenging Micara over a druggy priest with a vice for boys but cash lines to build a basilica? Maciel was redeemed by an illegitimate order from a cardinal to whom he had given $10,000 13 years before, according to a priest with access to Legion files. Micara, who had blessed the cornerstone, wanted infrastructure. Maciel had the money.
Like the captured U.S. soldiers brainwashed by Chinese communists in "The Manchurian Candidate," a Cold War film, the seminarians from Mexico carried traumatic scars of Maciel's psychological tyranny for decades. Unlike the movie characters, Maciel's victims never forgot. In 1998, José Barba, a Mexico City college professor and former Legion seminarian with Vaca, went to Rome with another of the original victims and filed a canon law appeal in the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, then under Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, requesting a Vatican prosecution of Maciel.
Targeting women of wealth
Maciel's financial strategy targeted the wives of wealthy men. A crucial supporter was Flora Barragán, the widow of an industrialist in Mexico's steel-producing city of Monterrey. After Barragán's death, her daughter told Barba that she had donated $50 million to the Legion. Barba, who teaches at the Autonomous Technical Institute of Mexico, said that he cannot verify the $50 million figure but said "Flora's support was substantial."
Barba entered the Legion in 1948, at 11, and left in 1962. He earned a doctorate at Harvard in Latin American literature.
"Maciel was in the habit of buying things in cash," Barba told NCR during a March 4 interview in Mexico City.
Barba continued: "Maciel was 27 when he purchased the [first seminary] estate. In 1950 he began construction on the Instituto Cumbres, the first prep school, in Mexico City, the land for which Flora provided. That summer he also inaugurated Collegio Massimo in Rome. He was 30. In 1953 he tried to start construction of a college in Salamanca. I was there," said Barba. "The bishop was sick; he failed to lay the cornerstone. He began the work in 1954 and completed it five years later. It was also in 1954 that he [Maciel] purchased the old spa in Ontenada, Spain, which had its own lake, for another seminary. Again, he paid cash. Fr. Gregorio López, a Legion priest, told me he delivered the money, wrapped in thin paper, to Leopoldo Corinez," who represented the family that owned the property. "I do not know the exact amount."
In 1958 he built a seminary in Salamanca, Spain, thanks to the largesse of Josefita Pérez Jiménez, the daughter of a former Venezuelan dictator.
Maciel reaped lasting dividends in Monterrey with the Garza-Sada families. The dynasty dates to 1890, when Isaac Garza and his brother-in-law, Francisco Sada, opened a brewery. Isaac's sons, Eugenio and Roberto Garza Sada, both graduates of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, built a bottling factory in 1943. As they branched into other industries, the Garza brothers founded a university, TEC — the Technical Institute of Superior Studies in Monterrey.
Maciel launched private schools in Monterrey, one for boys, one for girls. He exported to America a model for prep schools to attract well-heeled families who would join Regnum Christi, which organized study groups to discuss Maciel's letters. Lay celibates, the highest level of Regnum Christi members, live in communities and work relentlessly on fundraising. The Web site www.Life-after-rc.com, run by a former Regnum Christi leader, documents the cult-like dynamics with messages of people who have lost loved ones to "the Movement."
Monterrey was Maciel's financial springboard. After Dionisio Garza died in 1991, his wife and several of his children donated to the Legion. Media reports have likened the Garza family wealth to that of the Rockefellers.
"One of my aunts gave Maciel a house," said Roberta Garza, 44, the youngest of the eight siblings, and editor of Milenio newspaper's magazine in Mexico City. In a March 2 interview in Mexico, she described her late father as "a conservative Victorian gentleman, incredibly well loved. Our family rarely watched TV. We came together after dinner and we talked."
After the patriarch's death, Maciel courted the widow for support. "My mother gave him jewels and a lot of money," said Roberta Garza. Her mother, now quite aged, "never learned about his kids. He targeted women in Mexico of a certain class who were not allowed to work. I had to fight to go to college. For cultured women who were bored, Maciel offered a sense of purpose."
Roberta Garza studied as a boarder at Catholic schools in France and Germany, reading voraciously, "developing a critical mind that got me into trouble back in Monterrey." She returned in 1980 for a Legion high school but found it "rigid, highly traditional, and not analytical. One of my in-laws had a daughter who was not learning English. She complained to the Legionary priest. He actually told her: 'The final judgment will not be in English.'
"They were grooming us for Regnum Christi — the Movement. If your family had money, power, influence, they wanted you. They kept telling me, 'God gave you everything, you must give back by fighting the forces of evil.' … Their whole discourse was this paradise of moral rectitude. After France, where I could think freely, I was crying every night, thinking this is my family, my home, I don't want to be here. I almost cracked up."
Two of her siblings joined the Movement. Paulina, now in her 50s, is a Regnum Christi consecrated woman in Rome. A brother, Fr. Luis Garza Medina, graduated from Stanford University in California in 1978 with a degree in industrial engineering and entered the Legion. At 32 he became vicar general, the second highest position. Through the two siblings, Maciel secured a continuing flow of money from the family. Fr. Garza donated $3 million of his inheritance to the Legion, according to a colleague at the time. In an e-mail exchange, Fr. Garza would neither confirm nor deny the amount or the donation.
Today, the Garza family is splintered. "One of my brothers hates the Legion more than I do," said Roberta Garza, who abandoned religion after college.
The eldest sibling, Dionisio Garza Medina — paternal namesake and CEO of Alfa, the multinational founded by the grandfather — told The Wall Street Journal: "The Legion is the only Mexican multinational in the world of religion."
When the Garza siblings gather as a family, they use good manners to avoid discussing the Legion. At Christmas 2009, she said, Luis hung his head, and to Roberta seemed deeply depressed.
In an exchange of several e-mails, Fr. Garza refused to answer questions.
Flashpoint of the scandal
Mexico City has become the flashpoint in the deepening Legion scandal. The catalyst in both the media coverage and the legal saga is attorney José Bonilla.
The revolution in his life began in 2006 when he sued the Legion for the sexual abuse of his 5-year-old son by a lay teacher at the Legion's Oxford School in Mexico City. The boy told his mother that a male teacher had bitten his penis. After getting the child medical care, Bonilla and his wife, Lisset Aldrete, also a lawyer, met with the principal. He said the principal took no action. They filed criminal charges against the teacher, Joaquín Francisco Mondragón Rebollo, who disappeared and is a fugitive from justice. The family has won initial rounds in a civil case against the Legion school, said Bonilla.
Bonilla, 50, earned his bachelor's and law degrees from the Jesuit-run Ibero-American University in Mexico City. Sitting in a sun-dappled parlor, he spoke tenderly of his child (the youngest of five). Bonilla's blog — conlajusticia.wordpress.com — is a moral excavation of the Legion. "The blog," he said, "is how Raúl found me."
Raúl -- José Raúl González Lara, 29, the Maciel middle son -- asked Bonilla for legal help against the Legion. After his father's death, priests at Anáhuac, the Legion's flagship university in Mexico City, guided Raúl to a trust account Maciel supposedly established for the family, but it was empty, said Bonilla.
"The Legion gave Raúl a copy of a trust they told him was taken away from Norma [the daughter in Spain]," said Bonilla. He believes the Legion officials in Mexico were trying to make the half-siblings get into a legal conflict over Maciel's estate. Raúl's efforts for a family settlement failed.
On March 3, the family did a one-hour interview on MVS Radio with Carmen Aristegui, who also hosts a CNN Mexico newsmaker show. Aristegui won a Columbia University 2008 Maria Moors Cabot Prize. (Disclosure: Aristegui did the Spanish narration for my film "Vows of Silence.") The radio program, simulcast on video and posted on YouTube, made international news. Raúl; his mother, Blanca Lara Gutiérrez; and his brother, Omar, 33, spoke traumatically of life with Maciel.
Bonilla's interview adds additional details of the family history.
In 1977, Blanca, 19, was working in Tijuana as a domestic when she met "Raúl Rivas," 57, a self-described widower and international detective for oil companies. Despite his travels, he wooed her by buying a house in Cuernavaca, a colonial town outside Mexico City. Though they didn't marry, he became adoptive father of her 3-year-old son, Omar, from a previous relationship. Bonilla said that the adoption paper and the birth certificates for their natural sons, Raúl, and Christian, now 17, are "legally a mess. Maciel made up his name and gave it to the younger boys." He was away long stretches as the boys grew. But Blanca Gutiérrez, who grew up poor, had a house and income. "I loved him very much," she told Aristegui. "I never suspected."
On the program, Raúl bristled: "When I was 7 years old, I was lying down with him like any boy, any son with his father. He pulled down my pants and tried to rape me."
Self-effacing in Cuernavaca, careful to not be photographed, "Rivas" began taking Omar and Raúl on trips to Europe, molesting them between the ages of 8 and 14. "As teenagers they began pushing him off," said Bonilla.
A few years after buying the house for Blanca, Maciel met Norma Hilda Baños, in Acapulco. In 1987, age 26, she had his child, also named Norma Hilda. What little is known of them comes from Spanish reporters Idoia Sota and José M. Vidal, who located them in an upscale Madrid apartment building, eliciting brief comments for an article last year in El Mundo. "When I met this man I was underaged," the mother, Norma Hilda Baños, identified as 48, is quoted. "Neither my daughter nor I knew who this man really was until the very end." The daughter "was abused by her father, Maciel," the mother is quoted in El Mundo. "She suffers from severe trauma from her childhood and I don't believe she is ever going to get over it."
The article said that Maciel left Baños "two homes in her name in the exclusive Madrid building where she lives and three [other] places, all valued at about 2 million euros."
According to the Spanish reporters, Maciel also had three children with another Mexican woman, who now lives in Switzerland, which would make six natural children by three women, and the adoptive Omar as a seventh.
When Raúl was 6, Maciel sent him to boarding school in Ireland for several years. In 1991, when Raúl was 10 and Norma 4, Maciel took them to the Vatican; they received Communion from Pope John Paul II, according to Bonilla. His Web site has a photograph of the two children holding hands with a Swiss Guard. Many priests and bishops have taken children to meet the pope. More interesting is how Maciel got them to receive Communion. Presenting his children to John Paul suggests a reckless cynicism in Maciel's behavior, gambling with his public image as a priest by showcasing the progeny of his private life, putting both of his lives on simultaneous display.
In America the major media ignored the Feb. 23, 1997, Courant investigation until the 2002 Boston scandal. But in Mexico, a daily paper ran a series and a cable TV station did a documentary. In spring 1997, Maciel called Raúl, 16, and told him to buy up all available copies of Contenido magazine and get rid of them. On the cover, Raúl saw his father in a Roman collar with a different name. The older boys refused to let Christian, 4, be alone with their father. As Maciel became more distant, he still supported them financially, said Bonilla.
About that time, Maciel moved Norma and 10-year-old Normita to Spain. Within a year or so, he sent Raúl to live with them for several months as the teenage boy saw a pyschotherapist for issues caused by incest and discovery of his father-as-Father.
Both families had to keep the secrets for financial survival.
Several years ago, said attorney Bonilla, Normita, the daughter, studied at Anáhuac University in Mexico City. "The Legion knew who she was," insisted Bonilla.
"I don't know whether that's true or not," said Legion spokesman Jim Fair. "We wouldn't comment on former students, if they were former students. You'd have to get that from her."
The day after the Rivas family's radio interview, the Legion released a Jan. 5 letter that rebuffed Raúl's demand for $26 million, for which he had reputedly promised silence in return. Bonilla withdrew as legal counsel, citing professional ethics over a client bargaining silence for money. He has 70 other clients who were abused or have children who were abused, not just by religious figures. As the Legion engages in a financial chess game with Raúl, his demand for the family's compensation has become a Vatican issue. In November, Bonilla and the family met with Bishop Ricardo Watty, the Mexican visitator in the Legion investigation. "I have met with Watty twice," Bonilla told NCR. "He was very concerned about the children not having support. He tried to bring the parties together to resolve this. I saw him as having instructions from the pope or [Vatican Secretary of State Cardinal Tarcisio] Bertone to solve the problem."
Fr. Marcial Maciel Degollado, wearing glasses at center left, is pictured with young Legion of Christ students in this photo believed to be taken in Mexico in the mid-1940s. (CNS photo)
Sodano, the patron in Rome
The centerpiece of Maciel's plan to secure his legacy in Rome was the Legion's university, Regina Apostolorum, where Harvard Law Professor Mary Ann Glendon, the former U.S. ambassador to the Vatican, taught courses. She has been an advisor to the Legion, which has expanded in America with the University of Sacramento in California.
Cardinal Angelo Sodano, Vatican secretary of state from 1990 to 2006, was a pivotal figure in the university's growth in Rome.
Maciel and Sodano forged a friendship in Chile in the 1980s during the Augusto Pinochet dictatorship. The Legion needed Cardinal Raúl Silva Henríquez's permission to function. Haunted by the regime's torturing and abducting of people, Silva had a tense relationship with Sodano, who as papal nuncio appeared on TV in support of Pinochet. Several Chilean bishops implored Silva not to admit Maciel's group, which had a tainted reputation as "millonarios de Cristo" for their obsessions with fundraising. "In a society as polarized as Chile," Andrea Insunza and Javier Ortega wrote in a book on the Legion in Chile, "the Legionaries found a key ally: the apostolic nuncio, Angelo Sodano." Silva approved the Legionaries' presence in Chile.
Back to Rome in 1989, Sodano, in preparing to become secretary of state, took English lessons at a Legion center in Dublin, Ireland. He vacationed at a Legion villa in Southern Italy. An honored guest at Legion dinners and banquets, Sodano became Maciel's biggest supporter. Glenn Favreau, a Washington, D.C., attorney and former Legionary in Rome, said: "Sodano intervened with Italian officials to get zoning variances to build the university" on a wooded plateau of western Rome. Maciel hired Sodano's nephew, Andrea Sodano, as a building consultant. Pontificial Athenaeum Regina Apostolorum is the name of the complex.
But Legionaries overseeing the project complained to Maciel that Andrea Sodano's work was late and poorly done; they were reluctant to pay his invoices. To them, Maciel yelled: "Pay him! You pay him!"
Andrea Sodano was paid.
In 2008, a flashy Italian businessman, Raffaello Follieri, was indicted in New York on fraud and money-laundering charges for his business that bought shuttered church properties and parishes for commercial resale. Andrea Sodano was Follieri Group's vice president. Cardinal Sodano attended the company's 2004 launch party in New York, accorded to press reports. As NCR reported March 3, 2006, the firm's literature trumpeted its "deep commitment to the Catholic church and its long-standing relationship with senior members of the Vatican hierarchy."
After the company secured major backing from billionaire Ron Burkle's Yucaipa development company, Follieri spent wildly on his jet-set romance with movie star Anne Hathaway. As the Follieri-Yucaipa partnership found properties, Follieri sent payments to Andrea Sodano's office in Italy by bank wire transfer.
Documents obtained by the FBI show that Follieri fabricated backdated invoices from Sodano to justify a two-month flurry of payments in 2005 that Follieri had already obtained from the investors. These included: $75,000 on Aug. 22, for "Engineering Services"; a Sept. 12 invoice for $15,000 for work in Atlantic City, N.J., and $80,000 in Orland Park in the Chicago archdiocese; Oct. 21, for $70,000 in Canyon City (no state given in the invoice); another $50,000 for Orland Park; and $75,000 for unspecified "Engineering Services," making a tidy $225,000 net on that single day. None of the single-page invoices has a paragraph on work done.
In the weekly conference calls with Burkle's company, Follieri escalated his request for funds to pay Sodano, stressing that the Vatican needed the engineering reports in order to grant approval for the sales of church property. Yucaipa paid $800,000 to that end, with Follieri providing fabricated, backdated invoices to document payments purportedly made to Andrea Sodano.
On March 8, 2006 — two months before Maciel was banished from the priesthood — Cardinal Sodano sent a letter of complaint to Follieri. "I feel it is my duty to tell you how perturbed I am," he wrote, "to hear that your company continues to present itself as having ties to 'the Vatican,' due to the fact that my nephew, Andrea, has agreed on some occasion to provide you with professional consulting services. I do not know how this distressing misunderstanding could have occurred, but it is necessary now to avoid such confusion in the future. I do, therefore, appeal to your sensibility to be careful with respect to this matter. I shall accordingly inform my nephew Andrea as well as anyone else who has asked me for information regarding your firm. I take this opportunity to send you my regards."
The letter came just after NCR's report by Joe Feuerherd that quoted an unnamed religious order official on Follieri Group saying, "This thing smells."
As Andrea Sodano was promoting the business, Cardinal Sodano — having lent his sacred office to handshakes and chatting up potential backers at the Follieri Group's launch — began backpedaling. Follieri had begun bragging to potential investors that he was the chief financial officer of the Vatican. Nevertheless, four months after the cardinal's letter, Raffaello and Andrea Sodano flew to Latin America on a property-scouting trip. Follieri handed a check for $25,000 to one archbishop and a check for $85,000 to another archbishop. "The recipients of these donations did not know that Follieri had stolen the money to give to them," states an FBI sentencing memorandum on the Follieri case.
In spring of 2007, Burkle wanted to see the engineering reports. Follieri made a secretary stay up all night writing the reports, which he backdated and disgorged to Burkle's people.
"The reports were in Italian," explains FBI agent Theodore Cacioppi. "Each one was about two to five pages long. None of them contained any schematics, technical drawings, diagrams, or anything that appeared to relate to engineering." The reports "were almost worthless, did not reflect any engineering work, and were certainly not worth over $800,000."
Burkle's Yucaipo Companies had its own investors, notably the New York State Common Retirement Fund, the California Teachers' Retirement Fund and California Public Employees' Retirement Fund. Yucaipo sued Follieri for $1.3 million. Follieri scrambled to repay the partnership, but was indicted.
On Oct. 23, 2008, he pleaded guilty to 14 counts of wire fraud, money-laundering and conspiracy, and is now serving 54 months in a federal prison.
"We believe Studio Sodano [Andrea's corporate name] took in fraudulently earned money," stated Cacioppi. "We considered these people unindicted co-conspirators."
Cacioppi continued, "We did not need to put those people on the stand. We did get intimations from the State Department that they were not inclined to talk with us. As a matter of resource allocation it was not worth trying to get them."
Andrea Sodano was safely back in Italy at the time of Follieri's arrest. The government document that accuses him of receiving payments also says that the Vatican itself received "donations" from Follieri's scam, an assertion that raises a question about Cardinal Sodano's judgment. What explains his trust in a flimflam man like Follieri?
The government sentencing memorandum on Follieri by the U.S. Attorney, Southern District of New York, further explained: "Follieri created the false impressions that he had ties to the Vatican, which enabled him to obtain church properties at below-market values, through his relationship with Andrea Sodano, the nephew ("Nephew") of the then-Secretary of State of the Vatican Cardinal Angelo Sodano … and making unauthorized donations to the Vatican with investor money. Follieri misused investor funds to pay the Nephew for 'engineering' services that the Nephew never performed so that the Nephew could travel with Follieri when visiting church officials and help Follieri obtain access to the grounds of the Vatican. It was through this connection that Follieri was able to attend one of the Pope's services and, along with many others, get his picture taken with the Pope … show the private gardens of the Vatican to Follieri's friends and associates, and arrange for guided tours of a museum at the Vatican."
The sentencing memorandum continues: "Follieri also falsely represented that he needed over $800,000 to pay for the engineering reports prepared by the Nephew. Follieri claimed that the Vatican needed to review these engineering reports before Vatican could make any decision about whether to sell the properties to Follieri."
While Follieri found a friend in Andrea Sodano, Maciel had found one in Andrea's uncle, the cardinal. But Maciel's resource allocation ran into problems with the building of the university, Regina Apostolorum. He was hungry for Vatican approval for the highest level of recognition as a full pontifical academy, to put the freshly minted university on equal footing with the much older Lateran and Gregorian universities in Rome. To secure that standing, sources told NCR, the Legion in 1999 offered a Mercedes Benz to the late Cardinal Pio Laghi, who was prefect of Congregation for Catholic Education (and former papal ambassador to the United States). Appalled, Laghi rejected the offer, according to a priest who witnessed the exchange.
Laghi's successor, Polish Cardinal Zenon Grocholewski, refused the authorization too. Cardinal Sodano secured a status below the prestigious level Maciel and the Legion had sought.
Maciel died in a surreal drama where his life pieces converged with shuddering fall. In late January 2008, he was in a hospital in Miami, according to a Jan. 31, 2010 report by reporters Sota and Vidal of El Mundo. Although the article (available in English on exlcblog.com) is layered in opinion about Maciel's character, it provides a detailed look at the crisis he created for his followers. In the hospital gathered Alvaro Corcuera, Maciel's successor as director general; the Legion's general secretary, Evarista Sada; and numerous other associates. Maciel reportedly refused to make a confession, stirring such concerns that someone summoned an exorcist, though the article does not describe a ritual. The men around Maciel were jarred when two women appeared: Norma the mother, and Normita, 23. At that point, Maciel reportedly said of the Normas: "I want to stay with them."
The El Mundo article continues:
[Garza's] indignation could be read on his face. He faced the once-powerful founder and threatened him: "I will give you two hours to come with us or I will call all the press and the whole world will find out who you really are." And Maciel let his arm be twisted.
After the priests got Maciel to a Legion house in Jacksonville, Fla., he reportedly grew belligerent when Corcuero tried to anoint him, yelling, "I said no!" The article says Maciel refused to make a final confession, and states flatly that he "did not believe in God's pardon."
That is an opinion that Maciel's sordid life might well support, but for which, in fact, we have no proof. In announcing his ascent to heaven, immediately following Maciel's 2008 death, the Legion high command took propaganda to a level beyond category.
Support independent Catholic journalism. |
Luis Garza, in a March 15, 2010, e-mail response to an NCR request for comment on the El Mundo article, replied as follows: "I understand that you have many questions. But as I said in my earlier mail, at this point in time with the situation as it is, there really isn't more I can provide. I am sorry.
"I will continue to pray for all who suffered from Fr. Maciel's actions. And I hope you and your readers will keep us in their prayers. I pray for you and your mission as a journalist."
[Jason Berry is author of Lead Us Not into Temptation and other books. His film Vows of Silence explores the Vatican investigation of Maciel. An investigative grant from The Investigative Fund at The Nation Institute supported research for this article. www.VowsofSilenceFilm.com.]
Part I: Money paved way for Maciel's influence in the Vatican







WOW! Great article. One
WOW! Great article. One wonders how many other "groups" within the hierarchical system of the church are perpetrating similar schemes. Could the secretive visitation of American religious by Cardinal Rode be a way of garnering funds and properties to replenish support for the Vatican's financial dealings?
Not likely, but I am certain
Not likely, but I am certain it is about finding more religious frauds. Without their habits they are harder to spot.
Thanks for this fascinating
Thanks for this fascinating reporting.
I liked the phrase "searchlight eyes". I suspect Maciel's brilliance stems from a suite of skills similarly possessed by charismatic villains like Stalin, Ted Haggard and David Miscavige (the Scientology boss). The charm, intelligence, memory, confidence, the capacity to deceive, to engender loyalty, and to colonize people's wishful aspirations.
The species is certainly a work in progress.
I wonder how close we are to figuring out the means of raising children unlikely to succumb to such personalities, or the means of reducing the probability that such personalities will emerge in the first place.
Astounding, but not
Astounding, but not surprising. Con men, bullies, willing dupes all figure in this saga. Very human and victims (sometimes gullible, sometimes a bit skeptical but still willing) galore are found everywhere. The really, really discouraging part is the final denial of forgiveness on the part of Maciel and attempts at coverup by Cardinal Sodano and the order. Immediate ascent to heaven! I wonder who had the chuzpah to dream that one up and promulgate it? What is he doing today? Thank God this mess is coming to light.
What we don't learn by
What we don't learn by failing to read slowly, closely, and with full attention: "Maciel forced all Legionaries to take private vows, never to speak ill of Maciel or any superiors, and to report to their superiors anyone who did." So much of our Catholic paraphernalia corresponds so closely as a meta-text to familiar but ill-studied Great Works.
We went to a clump of bushes, and Tom made everybody swear to keep the secret, and then showed them a hole in the hill, right in the thickest part of the bushes. Then we lit the candles, and crawled in on our hands and knees. We went about two hundred yards, and then the cave opened up. Tom poked about amongst the passages, and pretty soon ducked under a wall where you wouldn't a noticed that there was a hole. We went along a narrow place and got into a kind of room, all damp and sweaty and cold, and there we stopped. Tom says:
"Now, we'll start this band of robbers and call it Tom Sawyer's Gang (See John A. Murrell's gang). Everybody that wants to join has got to take an oath, and write his name in blood."
Everybody was willing. So Tom got out a sheet of paper that he had wrote the oath on, and read it. It swore every boy to stick to the band, and never tell any of the secrets; and if anybody done anything to any boy in the band, whichever boy was ordered to kill that person and his family must do it, and he mustn't eat and he mustn't sleep till he had killed them and hacked a cross in their breasts, which was the sign of the band. And nobody that didn't belong to the band could use that mark, and if he did he must be sued; and if he done it again he must be killed. And if anybody that belonged to the band told the secrets, he must have his throat cut, [and his bowels took out and burnt up before his face] and then have his carcass burnt up and the ashes scattered all around, and his name blotted off of the list with blood and never mentioned again by the gang, but have a curse put on it and be forgot forever.
Everybody said it was a real beautiful oath, and asked Tom if he got it out of his own head. He said, some of it, but the rest was out of pirate-books and robber-books, and every gang that was high-toned had it.
Some thought it would be good to kill the families of boys that told the secrets. Tom said it was a good idea, so he took a pencil and wrote it in.
The Legion of Christ always had something quite sinister in its Mafia-like oath of secrecy.
I can hear the doors closing
I can hear the doors closing in the Vatican. As there is a statue of limitations for claims in law so should be a statue of limitations for working in the Vatican Curia. Some have been there since childbirth it seems. Old men continuing to hold together an outdated from of bureaucracy. For the glory of God! No for the glory of themselves masqurading as servants!
The Legion must be disbanded immediately.
Thanks for the article. The
Thanks for the article. The internal links aren't working.
"Money talks and bullsh--
"Money talks and bullsh-- walks."
---Danny DeVito in "Twins"
Jason Berry, you and the
Jason Berry, you and the late-Gerald Renner are the Woodward and Bernstein of the Catholic world. Thank you for your heroic work of investigative journalism. In a time when much of what passes for journalism is little more than press releases from the powers that be, you show everyone what real journalism looks like. I know you, along with Maciel's victims, have suffered slander and character assassination from the Legion and its web of confederates. God Bless you for standing up for the truth.
As for Maciel and the Legion, what a miserable story that is. The sooner that sick organization is disbanded, the better off everyone will be. It has been a disgrace to the Catholic Church long enough.
Steve
Anyone who gives money to to
Anyone who gives money to to the Catholic Church is a fool!
Its true that the press is
Its true that the press is bad, some made worse, and sadly, evil has haunted the most sacred in such scandal.
Still.. there are so many of 'us' out there.. those that love the sacramental life of the church, still Priest, and brothers, and sisters of the poor, and Friars, and those in the trenches, teachers, so many who are hanging in there.
It is not any more a fool to give to the church as it is of you to say such a horrid and broad statement. One that dismisses the rest of us - even a history of service to he poor, this hospital here, and there, this school, this mission, as Catholics have so often been in the very thick of it - trying to get the mission of Jesus out there.
The percentage of all of this has yet to be compared to other religious and even secular institutions, even public schools, and so forth. No matter, it does NOT lessen the seriousness of this problem or the evil that has lived in it.
Its a mess. Reminds me of the Middle Ages. Yet there are people like St Francis, and St Clare, and so many - that are walking the walk, and working very hard to be who they say they are.
Ever met the Friars of the Renewal, the Sisters of Life, the Little Sisters of the Poor, the Sisters of Mother Teresa, the folks taking care of the sick in so many places.. Lourdes, on and on..
please, give some of us a break.
Your comment reminded me of
Your comment reminded me of something that has been bothering me for a while. I make this comment with the caveat that it is not solely intended toward your post.
But I am so tired of the comparison argument. I don't care how many more pedophiles there are in other religious traditions or other social groups. The priests who are pedophiles/ephebophiles need to be removed from active ministry and prosectued to the fullest extent the law allows. Period. The hell with the comparisons. Let's just advocate for doing the right thing for the children.
How can you all stay Catholic
How can you all stay Catholic with all of the evidence that the Catholic
church is simply the Roman Empire mixed with apostate christian doctrines?
It's a fact. Your church came into existence in the 4th century as a result of the Roman Empire making a distorted form of Christinaity the state religion. Now...we see it's infested with homosexual pedophiles. Does a house have to fall on you all before you wake up?
Good question, Anonymous. I
Good question, Anonymous. I can only speak for myself. I stay because I am called, and because I have found a community of decent, caring people in my home parish. Do not judge all of us by the actions of the criminals, cheats, and enablers among us.
If all of us who dare to question authority and demand accountability leave, who will be left to protect the children who remain behind? Abuser priests like Maciel gained great power and did terrible damage, in part, because good priests and laypeople did not want to face the horror of child sexual abuse.
We cannot simply turn away, although it would be easier. I don't blame anyone who has chosen to leave; they are my brothers and sisters in Christ and I wish them the best.
Peace to you,
--MB
I admire you willingness to
I admire you willingness to be honest while on your journey. The only thing you said with which I would take issue is; "We cannot simply turn away, although it would be easier". For many, turing away has been anything but easy. As a matter of fact it often is one of the most difficult things that thay have had to do.
from archangel To fashion
from archangel
To fashion only one reply to your question "Anonymous"....
how can anyone stay family with all the evidences that the family is made up of bums, hags and crazy people? It is because most of us bums, hags and crazy people are striving to become holy... not only through loving family when it's easy, but also to remain loving when it is most difficult as well. Such is a pathway, "Anonymous..." what I would call a 'rough road,' but nonethless, an ancient and holy pathway back to True Home.
It matters not when church nor family came into existence. It can be said the First family came into existence in Eden in timeless Time... and as you know, through circumstances literal or metaphorical-- it matters not which, for each speak to the exact foibles of human nature-- the First People were expelled.
Since then, all families are blessed and striving, at different speeds, to approximate on earth, True Home.... a Home of peace and love and care, so that all things might go right, so that all things that have gone wrong can be rowed toward, reached, and healed.
I'd just remind too, 'Anonymous," that we dont live in a house; we live in Creator. And remembering this, we are ever awake.
Peace be with you.
Dr. E
Dr. Clarissa Pinkola Estés
Columnist, National Catholic Reporter
Archived last: "They Tried to Stop Her at The Border"
The answer to this might be
The answer to this might be related in some way to why / how people in the USA can remain proud and loyal to a country with leadership of the class and moral integrity of people like Nixon, George W, and Rumsfeld.
It is very belittling to smear the general rank and file people with the same brush as those who seek out power and wealth by deception and duplicity.
Finally Anonymous, maybe ... just maybe, there is a hell of a lot more to being a Catholic than what is seen and reported about the political elite of the organisation.
Cheers
Bob
STUPID COMMENT Homosexuals
STUPID COMMENT
Homosexuals and Pedophiles are NOT one in the same.
The Pedophile is most always someone that has been abused very very early in life usually even before the age of 5, or moral reason, so that the damage is done, and so far as anyone knows, not repairable. BAD stuff among us. VERY STUPID of some church officials also to think that a move, or a sincere confession, or whatever would stop it.
"Your church" =
well.. it happened to be also most possibly the foundation of YOUR Bible? Shall we do on in this stupid conversation.
We are suffering human mistakes of some because of the evil doings of a few -
but one is too many, and there your argument stands on solid ground. Keep it there, and like Jesus, pray for the forgivness, the healing, of so many by so few
We "remain" Catholic because
We "remain" Catholic because there is no other way we can receive the Body and Blood of Christ. The Catholic Church was instituted by Christ but is filled with human beings. The Holy Spirit will always protect the Church as it is the Bride of Christ, and human beings will always be involved being the sinners we all are.
"We 'remain' Catholic because
"We 'remain' Catholic because there is no other way we can receive the Body and Blood of Christ."
This is an error. According to Rome herself, the Eastern Churches, though in schism, have valid apostolic succession, and therefore valid Eucharist.
Personally, I have not
Personally, I have not remained in the church, although I can understand the strong pull on someone to do so. Your statement about the roman empire and distorted form of christianity really makes no sense, how are any other forms of christianity less "distorted". Distorted, how?
My choice to leave was based on the church scapegoating gays and now jews and even TV and the internet for their problems and scandals. Homosexuals don't abuse children; priests do. I believe the problem with the church is inherent in it's authoritarian structure--the demand that believers "check their brain at the door". There is no accountability with that kind of system. The bigger part of the scandal is not the abuse, but the shielding and transferring of abusers from church to church and even to other countries. It is racketeering and should be prosecuted as a crime.
Sorry, but this part is very
Sorry, but this part is very poorly rewritten, terribly organized and with errors scattered through. Hope the author could be a thorough re-writing.
Thank you for your
Thank you for your contribution to the world wide catholic inernet.
This is incredible. Thank God
This is incredible. Thank God it is being brought to the surface.
In view of the sordid goings-on between Maciel and Rome that dates back to the papacy of Pius XII and continues to the present time, it now becomes clear why Pope John Paul II let his twisted worldview show itself in his mean-minded move to crush Liberation Theology. Pope Benedict seems yet to be of the same JP2 mind. The church is in a colossal mess beyond cleaning up except for a total systemic change.
If I were an episcopal appointee of John Paul II, I would be as embarrassed as hell. I'm not sure I would feel any better if I were appointed by Pope Benedict XVI. Now I better understand how the full blown schism between Vatican I and Vatican II got started and why it is raging. All the rotten clerical linen in the Vatican has got to be removed even though it means the exposure of people who own it. It's time for the ascendancy of the People Church.
Mary Ann Glendon could not
Mary Ann Glendon could not accept the Laetare Medal last year because of Notre Dame's invitation to President Obama. I wonder what she has to say for herself this year now that her connections to Maciel are public.
>>Mary Ann Glendon could not
>>Mary Ann Glendon could not accept the Laetare Medal last year because of Notre Dame's invitation to President Obama. I wonder what she has to say for herself this year now that her connections to Maciel are public.<<
Probably because she was fooled by Maciel's false piety, as were so many other good people. And Obama is not pure evil as Maciel was; but his callous disregard for babies who survived abortion is chilling in its own right.
Hypocrisy is never out of
Hypocrisy is never out of fashion with those who are sometimes the worst offenders against the very things they hold sacred.
I sincerely hope that all
I sincerely hope that all this sordid activity is published as widely as possible and any other actions of the Legion and RC in any cases of abuse made known, but more especially the alliances with the Legion and Macial of Cardinals such as Sodano and Rode. It puts the Pope in a strong and good light as he rejected the advances of money etc from Macial and the Legion. Why, given Rode's involvement is he still in his position ( as also Sodano and dare one say Cardinal Law!)?I hope, for the Church, and for the sake of the honest Legion members and the RC movement that they are suppressed and incorporated into other structures, it is obvious that any continuance of their present modus vivendi and operandi needs to be stopped, including the TV and media appearances of Legionary Priests. Their involvement with Notre Dame Centre in Jerusalem should be terminated instantly. Justice demands that they give financial assistance and restitution to both Macial's families and victims and I hope the financial scandal surrounding Vatican officials is made clear and public immediately and constantly , what the Churc needs is another Council and a thorough reform of the Institutional strucutures and the 'old boy networking' that has brought disgrace and ooprobrium on our Catholic Church. it is becoming more and more obvious that Benedict, ineffectual as he seems against the modern world, tried to do something and that his predecessor, far from stopping the rot got hoodwinked and did little to halt what the Gospel Christ tells us is one of the worst sins, that of leading the little ones astray. I also hope that this peculiar desire to canonise any recent Pope 'subito'is stopped now, even that process has been distorted and JP II now seems to have left a very mixed legacy- history needs a bit of distance before any cultus is observed. We face difficult times and the faithful are truly scandalised and hurt!
Finally, a constructive
Finally, a constructive response from someone who is trying to understand what's going in in the church, rather than someone who just wants to shut it down!
Four children? They ought to
Four children? They ought to get rid of celibacy - it is only a practice that could end tomorrow. Priest are able to adopt children, and even father them out of wedlock, but to have a wife? No. And for what?
If St. Peter wanted to enter a seminary today, he would not be accepted. Peter was married.
Read Edgar Davie's book "Illicit Celibacy and the Deposit of Faith" - on Amazon.com and published in 2009. It is an eye-opener. Everyone should demand that the practice of celibacy be stopped. Someone like St. Peter would make a great priest, bishop or pope.
You are sadly misled. What
You are sadly misled. What would getting rid of celibacy do? Wil it stop pedophiles from being pedophiles? Will it stop a priest from having more than one wife and fathering illicit children? Will it stop them from abusing their own children?
Besides Celibacy is a discipline and there already are married Catholic Priests. For example those in the Orthodox or who were married Anglican priests and converted to Catholicism. And some priests like St. Peter had wives in the past, who died and later they became priests.
Maybe you ought to take St. Paul's advice about the value of Celibacy... Or for that matter how about Jesus Christ who said that some men live celibately for the sake of serving God and the Kingdom of Heaven, so let those who can accept it, accept it?
Celibacy has served the Chrch well, far better than any other institution which has far higher rates of abuses and scandals from schools to government. No I think the Church should wisely do what it has done and survived on for 200 years, contrary to you 'Cradle Catholics' who just got here and have a lack of insight into history and reality.
I think you continue to frame
I think you continue to frame the argument about celibacy incorrectly. To want to end mandatory celibacy for Catholics is not to devalue celibacy. The key word here in "mandatory". I am one, like many, who sees the value for a celibant witness in The Church and would not want it taken away. But, I also see the mandatory part as being very distructive to many individuals and to The Church itself.
Also, your reference to the former Orthodox and Anglican men who converted to Catholism and were accepted into the Catholic priesthood to me shows that, even, The Church recongizes that one can be a priest while not being celibant. So, why not allow those who are Catholics the same option?
By the way, I am a "cradle Catholic" but one, like all cradle Catholics, did not "just get here". Also I do appriciate that you have a different insight into history and, what you call, reality, but I would not be so certain that your insight is the only one worth any weight. The Holy Spirit so often does, indeed, work thru those with whom we disagree. Peace and prayers for your journey.
EXCELLENT article! The fact
EXCELLENT article!
The fact that the man fathered FOUR children with two women and never married, ought to get people's attention. At least he supported them financially - if only with donor's money. Imagine if he had to go out and get a REAL job to pay the kid's and the multiple mother's bills.
Celibacy needs to be stopped. If St. Peter wanted to be a priest today, no seminary would take him because he was married. We need more priests like St. Peter - emotionally mature that results from the growth of a solid marriage relationship.
Read Edgar Davie's book, "Illicit Celibacy and the Deposit of Faith" for an eye-opener that explains why celibacy needs to go.
Since the Bible refers to
Since the Bible refers to Peter's mother-in-law and not his wife, he was likely a widower. Widowers are accepted into seminaries today (see Bl John XXIII National Seminary in Weston, MA; older men including widowers go there)
Graft, corruption and bribery
Graft, corruption and bribery (la mordida). It will never change because it's in the genes.
I have long since left the
I have long since left the church but like many others i am a 'cultural catholic' and i have tended to defend the church against what i consider to be anti-catholic bigotry disguised as fair criticism (see comment above 'how can you all stay catholic' as an example.
However, between the failure of the church to address the paedophilia crisis
and these revelations i found even my 'cultural' faith tested.
Is the catholic church a force for good in the world? Or its opposite?
Would we all be better off if the church disappeared into history?
The only hope i can see (or perhaps, my fantasy solution) is for a council to be called where the church embraces the changes so clearly necessary.
-The abolition of compulsory celibacy in the priesthood
-The ordination of women
-The acceptance of homosexuals
-The removal of the various absurd restrictions on the use of contraception.
- The absolute commitment to the rooting out of any priests/brothers and other religious involved in the abuse of children, with a full apl;ogy and necessary reparation to all victims.
None of these changes would take us away from the basic beliefs of the Catholic church and a demonstrated commitment to the core values of Christ would give the church a future.
But i really don't think these things will happen, rather the church will wither away over the next few decades and end up an historucal irrelevance and so much that has been good in our faith's history will be lost.
I suppose that in the end the real question is; who 'owns' the church, the faithful (especially the laity) or the pope, cardinals and bishops?
Who owns the Church depends
Who owns the Church depends on which Church you are referring to. The material assets are owned by the Hierarchy and the laity will never have any real say in that Church. Except for the donation end of things.
The Spiritual end of the Church is owned by the laity even though we are taught that too is owned by the clergy and we laity are dependant on them for our spiritual sustenance.
If the abuse crisis has taught me anything, it's that the clerical fantasy of 'owning' the spiritual aspect of the Church is just that a fantasy, and that too many members of the hierarchy are willing to sell their souls to keep that fantasy in tact because it's the source for their material wealth.
They can have the material church, I'll take the spiritual church.
Nicely said! Please include
Nicely said! Please include me as a member of the church of the spiritual!
-aboliton of celibacy? what
-aboliton of celibacy? what would that accomplish; if you are naive enough to believe that cures a pedophile, then think again - to follow your logic, the only reason a pedophile would marry would be for one of two reasons: 1)to have a sexual outlet - which means you are reducing the concept of wife to a sex object - or 2)to breed and grow his own victims.
there is no link between celibacy and paedophilia as numerous statistics have repeatedly shown. The overwhelming majority (some say over 60%) of paedophiles are married men.
- ordination of women - what like other Christian denominations? you mean like all of the other mainstream churches that are dying by degrees more rapidly in numbers than the Roman Catholic Church? Puh-leeze....if that was the solution to all ills, don't you think that people would be banging down the doors of the other denominations that have women ministers?
The only thing I can completely agree on with you is the rooting out and removal of all (get that ALL -not just priests but laypeople too) who are involved in any kind of heinous act such as abuse of children. The Church must not simply always do the right thing, she must always appear to be doing the right thing!
aboliton of celibacy? what
aboliton of celibacy? what would that accomplish; if you are naive enough to believe that cures a pedophile, then think again - to follow your logic, the only reason a pedophile would marry would be for one of two reasons: 1)to have a sexual outlet - which means you are reducing the concept of wife to a sex object - or 2)to breed and grow his own victims.
there is no link between celibacy and paedophilia as numerous statistics have repeatedly shown. The overwhelming majority (some say over 60%) of paedophiles are married men.
- ordination of women - what like other Christian denominations? you mean like all of the other mainstream churches that are dying by degrees more rapidly in numbers than the Roman Catholic Church? Puh-leeze....if that was the solution to all ills, don't you think that people would be banging down the doors of the other denominations that have women ministers?
The only thing I can completely agree on with you is the rooting out and removal of all (get that ALL -not just priests but laypeople too) who are involved in any kind of heinous act such as abuse of children. The Church must not simply always do the right thing, she must always appear to be doing the right thing!
________________________________________
Puh-leeze yourself anon! Cause that's all you're doing just pleasing yourself. Too many institutional prigs are always in the "no". It's evident the RCC and its attentant 'bots don't give a rat's a... about anything deeper than a face lift!
Not only is optional celibacy an older tradition than mandatory celibacy, priests who marry would have an "inhouse" witness that might not put up with her holy husband's atrocities. As long as the institutional church bans men of the cloth from having wives and children and bans women from ordination there won't be any checks and balances for the ole boys "in house". So nothing will change and you can feel good as a true 'no' it all cath. that helps the heirarchy continue turning the Church of Rome into an even bigger disaster than it already "appears" to be!!
Married priests, women
Married priests, women priests, recognition that homosexuality is not a sin, a post-19th Century contraception policy; these are matters of natural justice and commmon sense. Why does the Church need to exist as a late medieval structure (because that is what the present policies on celibacy, women etc reflect)? Is there something especially sacred about the year 1250 that we need to emulate it in our morals and worship?
And when you consider these issues, whay are they all about sex? Why is the Church so obsessed with sexuality?
You suggest that married priests and women priests would not reduce the incidence of pedophilia among the clergy. I would suggest that the whole Zeitgeist of clerical life would be altered by such changes, it surely could not be any worse.
And we do not 'bang on the doors of other denominations' that have women clergy because we remain Catholics, but I am sure that in the case of many (and ask our sisters about this) it is despite, not because of, the present policies.
Pedophelia is a psychological disorder and i feel sorrow for these men and my anger is more directed at those who have concealed their crimes. But an organisation based on secrecy, access to children and poorly monitored power over such children is a magnet for pedophiles.
You point out that pedophilia is not linked to sexuality; please let the church spokesmen (for they are all men) blaming these crimes on homosexuality know about this information ASAP because they are promulgating falsehoods as we speak.
But, dear and incredibly prolific anonymous, i am glad that we share revulsion towards those who have concealed these crimes.
Somehow this controversy has reinvigorated my faith, the reason I 'lapsed' was the awful conservatism and irrelevance of the heirarchy and the sad history of the Catholic Church over the past 1000 or so years in 'Earthly' matters. Perhaps a rising up the laity over this matter will lead to a better church.
Maybe we need to stand up in Mass and say "enough, we have had enough, we lay claim to our Church and we say to those of you who have brought shame to our Faith - go, you are not welcome here anymore".
We are too ROMAN Catholic and
We are too ROMAN Catholic and not Catholic enough!
As a once catholic "conservative" and "traditionalist" I believed that the whole world was meant to be RC. Then, in my late 50's I grew up! Having studied theology, Biblical studies and Church history etc (and I have a degree to prove it)I had to leave my childish ways and become an adult Catholic. The paternalistic nonsense that emanates from the Vatican; the sight of seeing grown men dressing up (notice all the lace and finery that is reappearing); the inability of the present hierarchy to connect with reality makes me wonder just how much longer it will be before Jesus judges this branch of his vine....is it happening now? Are we not in need of a massive pruning (the vine does need to be pruned!).
I am not surprised at any of
I am not surprised at any of this. There needs to be a major reformation of the church, beginning with the papacy. But this article also makes me wonder about that other fair haired child of JPII, Opus Dei. What secrets do they and their founder have hidden?
Opus Dei's founder, Josemaria
Opus Dei's founder, Josemaria Escriva, has been canonized in 2002. Please don't think that there were such scandals in Opus Dei!!! The institution was divinely founded, and its human founder was a true model of holiness.
I can't think of anyone who
I can't think of anyone who is anti-Semetic and close to fascist dictators as a "A true model of holiness". My impression is that, like the LC founder, the founder of Opus Dei, Josemaris Escriva, was very skilled in fundraising, the politics of the Vatican and the spiritual vanity of those in charge.
"I can't think of anyone who
"I can't think of anyone who is anti-Semetic"
There is no indication from St. Josemaría's writings or lectures that he was racist towards Jews or any other racial group. The existence of minimal hearsay "evidence" does not somehow "prove" racism on Josemaría's part. I doubt that John Paul II, one of the greatest friends to Jews ever to sit in Peter's chair, would have so enthusiastically supported the cause for beatification and canonization of a hater of Jews and a supporter of Nazis.
"and close to fascist dictators"
There is no evidence, none at all, that St. Josemaría was "close" to Franco or other fascists. His letter to Franco does not implicate him as an adviser to, assistant of, or friend of the Spanish dictator. Josemaría insisted in his writings that priests stay out of politics, and was deeply critical of any sort of clerical involvement in political activity. Indeed, in his letter to Franco Josemaría identified himself as a "stranger to any political activity".
I am not aware of St. Josemaría ever having been accused of sexual impropriety. His critics argue that he was temperamental, authoritarian, arrogant, etc. not that he was a pedophile or pervert. If you argue otherwise, you would do well to either provide proof or to admit that your assertion is unfounded and libelous.
That's pretty much what the
That's pretty much what the Legion thought about Fr. Maciel.
This was another fast track
This was another fast track to sainthood that only weakens the the RCC and is a defensive manuver to try to explain away what is nothing more than a cult within the Church. This cult is up to serious financial transgressions and probably will be next in the sexual scandal
I'm glad that Opus Dei's
I'm glad that Opus Dei's early, similar problems (not the sexual ones but the others) have been somewhat fixed. It doesn't reflect well on OD that they're not more forthright about them. Does OD still have lay SD for children? That was a big red flag for me.
Since OD's founder was canonized under JPII's lowered standards (BXVI re-raised them as soon as he took office), he'll probably keep his Roger-Maris-like asterisk unless and until he has a lot more miracles attributed to his intercession.
You couldn’t make this up! I
You couldn’t make this up! I was reading and laughing.
Jason, make sure you have film rights.
Shame on you for writing with
Shame on you for writing with such a negative spirit. I am extremely disappointed in this article and hope that the next time you decide to write an article about your own brothers in Christ, you say a little prayer. You have failed to write objectively and have erred on the side of slander.
Pray and sacrifice for sinners.
Let him who is without sin cast the first stone.
God bless.
How can you write about a man
How can you write about a man who bribed church officials, sexually abused children, and fathered four children out of wedlock with a POSITIVE spirit? Good grief! Objectively speaking, you can't even say Maciel repented his sins at the end of his life. Tough to put a good spin on this story.
My only beef with Mr. Berry's journalism is his use of some anonymous sources. "A priest who is knowledgeable" and a priest who had "access to the files" are rather vague descriptions. I hope Berry's sources will eventually go on the record.
Anyone who has spoken up
Anyone who has spoken up about the Legion of Christ knows how good the Legion is at making your life miserable. Come back after you've endured a few years of their attacks on your character or escaped from one of their many lawsuits. I don't blame them for wanting to be anonymous.
I think that a few anonymous
I think that a few anonymous sources are okay for this story. 99% of the story has names, places, and dates that can be verified. The anonymity of a few people is to be expected in a story as explosive as this. After all, what they say will effect their standing with the Vatican. We, who have sat in the pews of the RC Church for years know how hard it is to "respectfully object" to our parish priests. Think about what it would be like if we had to "respectfully object" to the Vatican. On that note, I believe that there is an unreasonable amount of fear that ia spread to everyone in the RC Church by the Vatican - holding our eternal salvation as hostage if we speak against the Church. Salvation is through Christ but the Church would like for you to believe that it through Christ AND living according to the rules laid out for you in the Catechism of the Catholic Church and Canon Law.
"Truth is stranger than
"Truth is stranger than fiction" ~ this reads like the plot of trashy dime novel, yet it's investigative
journalism at it's best! I can't wait to read the sequel about another group who's foundation
was based on "cult of personality". Hint: one of it's Mexican-born members just became coadjutor
Archbishop of LA. It's all about the dinero!
I weep! Jesus did not give up
I weep!
Jesus did not give up his life for this.
Some years ago a good man told me you can have white power or you can have black power but at the end of the day it is green power that counts. Once again his words ring true, our church leads as those from all groups are blinded by the Green!
When it comes to men so often "If it is too good to be true, more than often it is not."
God Bless
On the contrary, Jesus gave
On the contrary, Jesus gave up his life for precisely for THAT sinner, and for Judas, and Stalin, and Hitler, and even for you and me. No one deserves redemption. The scandal of the Cross is that Christ died for all our sins, to bring light, hope, mercy and love to those who live in darkness.
Yes Jesus did die for ALL
Yes Jesus did die for ALL including Judas, et al... And his ministry of compassion which culminated in his death is meant to pull down the mighty from their thrones and raise up the lowly.
Sure that photo at the head
Sure that photo at the head of this article was taken in Mexico City? Surely it was taken in St Peter's Basilica.
Corporate Idolatry: For
Corporate Idolatry: For reasons of self-interest, humankind corporately compounds sin in pretending to be God-favored. Corporate self-arrogation is a cultured habit, an idolatry still favored. The Roman Catholic Church’s long-in-place culture of hyped institutional valuation is now having its come-uppance for its cover-up culture of clerical sexual abuse crimes. This arrogant mentality, the Catholic mind of “corporate idolatry”, arguably prejudiced the recent U.S. Supreme Court decision that sought the opportunity (against precedence) to give to corporations rights and standing equal to the human person when it comes to campaign advertising.
To this day the Roman Catholic Church still covers up sexual abuse crimes of its clerics. The Court decision to give equivalent personal standing to corporations enables cover up of corporate overreach of people. The Court might well expect to get and arguably deserves come-uppance from the public that the RCC is presently getting. It is germane to note that prior Court prejudice exists because the Justices are predominantly Roman Catholic. (I am a Roman Catholic who believes my Church is demonstrably wrong to claim infallibility and needs to be held accountable for its crimes of cover-up, and, that the U.S. Supreme Court is equally wrong to enable corporations to overreach people.)
What is even more mind boggling is the RCC’s recent likening its grief (from cover-up exposure) to that suffered by the Jewish people being blamed for causing the crucifixion of Jesus. This comparison is over-the-top; the comparison of Supreme Court prejudice favoring corporations is more to the point of common prior prejudice of the RCC now causing its disgrace. Institutions that devalue human rights and over value corporate rights deserve exposure and challenge.
The crash of Catholic Church credibility didn’t just happen, it is self-caused. Corporate self-advantaging over the human person, pretending in God’s name, is in all forms a kind of idolatry that flies in the face of divinely arranged natural order, and supplants human judgment for divine as script in the Laws of the “Naturalis Sacramentum Ordinis.” The sin of corporate super-arrogation is idolatrous, blaspemous and culturally corrosive.
As I mentioned in the first
As I mentioned in the first article, it is of interest to note that some Fatima writers had singled concern about Angelo Sadano as the Vatican Secretary of State having too much influence over the Church and the Pope. They believe that Sadano himself as well as others in the heirarchy had a hand in preventing the 3rd Secret of Fatima from being made public becuase perhaps the 3rd Secret that Our Lady was warning of was the corruption and evil things that some members of the clergy were doing that would harm the Church along with the worldwide apostacy that would follow.
And to address two other moronic comments here. For those wondering why we are still in the Catholic Church despite all this is becuase if you want to play tit for tat with abuse numbers and corruption then the Church is absolutely the best place to be, better than any Protestant Denomination, better than public schools, better than any government who have a horrifying history of scandals, greed, corruption, abuse and cover-ups. So sorry if you continue to live outside the Church or give your money to any government or send your kids and endanger their lives by leaivng them open to sexual predator teachers and staff at school, then who is the bigger fool?
This is not to make light on the absolutely terrible things that are happening within the Church. But perhaps it is you opportunists who ought to be more considerate of the victims, rather than use these occasions to push your own false beliefs and agendas. Absolutely disgusting!
The Catholic Church is the Church founded by Christ. It survived Christ Himself being betrayed by Judas and denied by Peter and persecutions against her that continue today around the world. And it will survive this and be better once its deserved chaastisments are finished with regards to these recent scandals which if you live in the real world, as bad as they are, are a tiny drop in the ocean compared to everything else out there that commits and covers up these exact same crimes.
Can we have some sense of
Can we have some sense of proportion?
In defence of Mary Ann Glendon: do you really imagine that she knew all this?
President Obama, however, has publicly stated his opposition to restricting late term abortions. Abusing children and deceiving others and corruption is horrible, but so is killing them. Why are we so righteously outraged by child abuse, and yet we condone late term abortion, dismemberment?
This article sounds like
This article sounds like damage control. It was bound to come out since trash papers like the New York Times will print anything, detraction or calumny without checking the facts.
In The Secret of the Rosary by St. Louis de Montfort, he states that when peoples pray the rosary, the culture comes back, but when they fail to pray the rosary, the culture fails into worldliness. What concerns me most is I don't hear the parishes calling for the daily rosary or even sounding an alarm as our world is in grave danger. I guess everyone is too busy with "daily duties?"
This makes for a fabulously
This makes for a fabulously engrossing story, it's got all the goodies, and I have no doubt it's true.
But everybody gets so caught up in the ugly sex & money parts that they don't look at the bigger picture: this guy Maciel, as troubled & evil as he was, truly was amazing for what he accompished -- building dozens of respected schools & universities (one of which I attended) & churches; creating a wildly successful & growing new religious order, the first in many generations; raising boatloads of money for charitible works, and training rich people to be financially supportive of such works. An unbelievable vision & energy -- as well as other massive appetites -- that drove him to this huge level of accomplishment, rare by any standard in any era!
To me, the best part of the story is that he vehemently refused confession & annointment in his last days... clearly he knew exactly what he was selling to the masses, rich or poor. Amen!
I agree with you. Maciel's
I agree with you. Maciel's life (at least that portion of it that we know about...I doubt we will ever have the full picture of this evil genius) should be made into one of those TELENOVELAS. It has all the elements and more to be a blockbuster that could run for years and years. I am sure that in Latin America millions and millions of TV addicts would not miss one episode.
You are absolutely right: we
You are absolutely right: we Latin Americans are a bunch of babbling idiots (true troglodytes indeed) addicted to telenovelas, real ones, not those General Hospital type ones. All of us. So, we would be glued to our TV sets watching the saga of Maciel's life, no doubt about it.
Oh, and we all look alike too.
There is a clear and certain
There is a clear and certain way for the laity to begin the necessary "reform" of the Catholic Church: as has been suggested by a few commentators above, the "money spigot" that the laity--and especially the enormously influential American Catholic laity--provides for the Vatican and its various causes needs to be entirely turned off for at least one whole fiscal year--EVERYTHING, including "Catholic Charities." That, and that alone could bring Pope Ratzinger into early retirement and elicit a call for a third Vatican Council to reform the structures of the Church in the lines that were merely adumbrated by Vatican II. Any American lay Catholics who continue to fund with their contributions this now-scandalous institution are BETRAYING CHRIST.
The church needs some serious
The church needs some serious purging. I know that will never happen, but it is needed.
It is so awful that my beloved church is filled with such power crazed men. They value their position and power
more than confronting abuse of its youngest and most helpless members. Sick! I am confused-can I believe
anything they say? Can the pope be trusted? I dont know.
"The church needs some
"The church needs some serious purging. I know that will never happen, but it is needed."
Perhaps there IS a way to bring it about:
cf. my suggestion in the April 26 edition of AMERICA magazine, page 44.
What is really astounding is
What is really astounding is to see that there is still many catholics that fear to denounce those who perpetrated criminal acts. How can you continue within an institution that has lost the moral authority?
I was born and lived in South America and I remember similar stories that were never denounced by the victims or the family members. I'm not surprise that these radical movements such La Legion de Cristo in Mexico or El Sodalitium in Peru ended accumulating to much power within the Vatican. After all, they were bringing money and creating links to the powerful conservative elites of South America.
Post new comment