NCR on Kindle - NCR classifieds - YouTube - Twitter - Facebook - Email Alerts - RSS
John Howard Yoder's Political Jesus
One of my earliest teachers of Jesus' nonviolence was the great Mennonite theologian John Howard Yoder.
I remember discovering in the fall of 1982 his seminal work, The Politics of Jesus, and devouring it. There I found for the first time someone who integrated my passion for Gandhian nonviolence with my devotion and discipleship to Jesus. Yoder answered all my questions. He outlined a theological way to understand the Gospel that made sense.
In the early 1990s, I met Yoder when he visited the Graduate Theological Union in Berkeley, Calif., where I was living and studying at the time. He was quiet, reserved and serious -- and as brilliant as I expected. He continued to teach the nonviolence of Jesus until his death in 1997.
Orbis Books has just published an excellent anthology of his works called John Howard Yoder: Spiritual Writings (edited by Paul Martens and Jenny Howell). Yoder has been called "one of the most passionate, eloquent and effective exponents of Christian nonviolence in the late twentieth century." This new collection makes that clear. His writing broke new ground and led to many new insights into the Gospel. He sowed the seeds for a theology and spirituality of peace and nonviolence that I hope will one day be widely embraced. I urge everyone interested in Christian nonviolence to read this book and study Yoder's wisdom. We're all indebted to him.
In their introduction, the editors tell of Yoder's life. Born to a modest Ohio Mennonite family in 1927, Yoder traveled in 1949 to war-torn France with a church service program to help provide basic services to those in need. After his return, he married his wife, Anne; eventually they had seven children. An active member of the International Fellowship of Reconciliation, Yoder became connected with many Christian peacemakers. His teaching career began at Goshen Biblical Seminary and led him to Notre Dame in 1977, where he taught until his death in 1997. Although he traveled the world giving scholarly lectures on ethics and scripture, he spent most of his life teaching and writing books.
His masterpiece, The Politics of Jesus, appeared in 1972.
"Yoder provided a coherent and compelling account of a political Jesus," the editors write, "a Jesus actually tempted by the Zealot option yet also a Messiah whose very suffering and death on the cross constituted a political act in solidarity with the poor and oppressed of this world, a Jesus whose kingdom was not some transcendent reality beyond this life, a Jesus who demanded imitation in the form of replacing dominion with servanthood and hostility with forgiveness."
NCR: February 17-March 1, 2012
Subscribe to NCR to get all the news and special features that aren't always available online. In this issue:
- Conscience Roundup
Hear what theologians, commentators, and our editors have to say about the contraception mandate
- Special Section: Religious Life
Work of missioners, past and future; African meetings; and more
- Tribute to a Peacemaker
New York's Pax Christi fetes Daniel Berrigan
Best known for his theological ethics, Yoder taught a communal vision of the church rooted in the life and teachings of the nonviolent Jesus, the editors write in their introduction.
For Yoder, one is not asked to believe in Jesus but to follow and participate in the life of Jesus (as if, in some way, belief could be separated from following).
Because Christ died on the cross, patiently allowing others to choose evil over obedience, so too Christians are called to follow Christ in nonviolence.
Yoder bravely writes: "The cross of Jesus is the extreme demonstration that agape seeks neither effectiveness nor justice, and is willing to suffer any loss or seeming defeat for the sake of obedience. In short, Christians are to live and love like Jesus, (and) know that in spite of the way things appear, God's purposes will prevail with the coming of God's kingdom: the resurrection of Jesus is proof that love cannot be conquered even if evil does its worst. With this assurance, Christians do not need to seek control, to make things come out right."
Yoder lived a quiet, scholarly life that directly influenced our nation's leading theologian, Stanley Hauerwas. But I wonder what influence Thomas Merton and the Berrigans had on Yoder. He was one of the rare few Merton invited to attend a small retreat at the Abbey of Gethsemani in 1964. Along with the Berrigans, A.J. Muste, Jim Forest and others, Yoder spent several days discussing the Christian roots of peacemaking. That retreat changed the lives of each participant. Maybe it spurred Yoder to write The Politics of Jesus.
This new anthology offers insights into ethics, community, church, history, national identity, the just war theory and hope. But three themes stand out for me: Yoder's teachings on nonviolence, Jesus and the cross.
"Before it is a social strategy, nonviolence is a moral commitment," Yoder writes. "Before it is a moral commitment, it is a distinctive spirituality. It presupposes and fosters a distinct way of seeing oneself and one's neighbor under God. That 'way of seeing' is more like prayer than it is like a shrewd social strategy, although it is both. It is more a faith than a theory, although it is both."
It was rare then and it's rare now to hear theologians espouse the wisdom of nonviolence. But Yoder understood it well. He tried to explore its spiritual roots.
"Nonviolent action is costly," he wrote. "It includes readiness at least for prison and a degree of risk of loss of life. (The willingness to take this risk) can only be rooted in a religious vision of the congruence between suffering and the purposes of God."
His writings on Jesus were original and visionary. He was one of the first to study Gandhi and King and read the Gospel through their eyes. Yoder's insights sound obvious now, but at the time, they were unheard of.
"The first thing to say about the biblical picture is that Jesus is a public figure," he writes. "He uses political language. The authorities perceive him as a political threat and put him to death because of it. The legal basis for his crucifixion in the Roman record books was the charge that he was an insurrectionist."
Few theologians write so explicitly about the political threat of Jesus and what that means for his followers. Here are other excerpts:
- "Jesus gave (his followers) a new way of life to live. He gave them a new way to deal with offenders -- by forgiving them. He gave them a new way to deal with violence -- by suffering. He gave them a new way to deal with money -- by sharing it. He gave them a new way to deal with problems of leadership -- by drawing upon the gift of every member, even the most humble. He gave them a new way to deal with a corrupt society -- by building a new order, not smashing the old. He gave them a new pattern of relationships between man and woman, parent and child, master and slave, in which was made concrete a radical new vision of what it means to be a human person. He gave them a new attitude toward the state and toward the 'enemy nation.'"
- "At the heart of the Christian faith properly understood is not dogma or ritual, but Jesus. At the heart of the meaning of Jesus is his teaching of the kingdom of God. At the heart of that teaching is the Sermon on the Mount. At the heart of the Sermon is the contrast between what had been said by them of old and what 'I now say to you.' At the core of these antitheses is the love of the enemy and nonresistance to evil. The result is what Tolstoy calls simply the 'key' to the scripture message: the cure for evil is suffering. Not only is this one dramatic and scandalous teaching of Jesus internally accredited as the key to the scriptures, it is also the key to what is wrong with the world."
- "What is wrong with the world is most fundamentally that people respond to evil with evil and thereby aggravate the spiral of violence. The key to the good news is that we are freed from prolonging the chain of evil causes engendering evil effects by action and reaction in kind. By refusing to extend the chain of vengeance, we break into the world with good news. This one key opened the door to a restructuring of the entire universe of Christian life and thought."
- "Jesus is saying (in Matt. 5:44-48) that we should not love only our friends because God did not love only his friends. We are asked to 'resemble God' just at this one point: not in his omnipotence or his eternity or his impeccability, but simply in the undiscriminating or unconditional character of God's love. This is not a fruit of long growth and maturation; it is not inconceivable or impossible. We can do it tomorrow if we believe. We can stop loving only the lovable, lending only to the reliable, giving only to the grateful, as soon as we grasp and are grasped by the unconditionality of the benevolence of God."
- "This is one of the keys to the problem of war and legitimate defense. Every argument that would permit the taking of life is in one way or another based on calculations of rights and merits. I prefer the life of those nearest me to that of the foreigner, or the life of the innocent to that of the trouble-maker, because my love is conditional, qualified, natural, just like that of everyone else. Jesus does not condemn this normal, self-seeking quality -- for Gentiles, but he says there is nothing new, nothing special, nothing redemptive or healing about it. 'What reward can you expect?' Not only is 'perfect love' not limited to those who merit it; it goes beyond the unjust demands of those who coerce compliance with their will. 'Do not (violently) resist one who does evil.' The alternative is creative concern for the person who is bent on evil, coupled with the refusal of his goals."
Because Yoder put together the practice of nonviolence with the life of Jesus, it is no wonder that much of his writing is focused on the meaning of the cross, and these reflections are unmatched. Forty years later, he still has much to teach of about the way of the cross. For example:
- "The believer's cross is no longer any and every kind of suffering, sickness, or tension, the bearing of which is demanded. The believer's cross is, like that of Jesus, the price of social nonconformity. It is not, like sickness or catastrophe, an inexplicable, unpredictable suffering. It is the end of a path freely chosen after counting the cost … The cross of Christ was not an inexplicable or chance event that happened to strike him, like illness or accident. To accept the cross as his destiny, to move toward it and even to provoke it, when he could well have done otherwise, was Jesus' constantly reiterated free choice. The cross of Calvary was not a difficult family situation, not a frustration of visions of personal fulfillment, a crushing debt, or a nagging in-law; it was the political, legally-to-be-expected result of a moral clash with the powers ruling his society."
- "Christ is agape; self-giving, nonresistant love. At the cross, this nonresistance, including the refusal to use political means of self defense, found its ultimate revelation in the uncomplaining and forgiving death of the innocent at the hands of the guilty. This death reveals how God deals with evil; here is the only valid starting point for Christian pacifism or nonresistance. The cross is the extreme demonstration that agape seeks neither effectiveness nor justice and is willing to suffer any loss or seeming defeat for the sake of obedience. But the cross is not defeat. Christ's obedience unto death was crowned by the miracle of the resurrection and the exaltation at the right hand of God."
John Howard Yoder deserves to be widely read, and this book is a good place to start. I hope all Catholic and Christian peace and justice activists will join me in studying Yoder's work to gain new insights into the nonviolence of Jesus and our own Gospel nonviolence.
***
John Dear's new book, Lazarus, Come Forth!, is available from Amazon.com. Next year, John will undertake a national book tour to discuss this Gospel confrontation of the God of life and peace against the culture of death and war. To host John for an evening talk, send an email through his website. His other recent books, including Daniel Berrigan: Essential Writings; Put Down Your Sword and A Persistent Peace, are also available from Amazon.com. To contribute to Catholic Relief Services' "Fr. John Dear Haiti Fund," go to: donate.crs.org/goto/fatherjohn. For more information, go to John Dear's website.
| We can send you an e-mail alert every time an On the Road to Peace column is posted to NCRonline.org. Go to this page and follow directions: E-mail alert sign-up. If you already receive e-mail alerts from us, click on the "update my profile" button to add On the Road to Peace to your list. |







Thanks for reporting on this
Thanks for reporting on this book. It's now on my Kindle waiting to be read.
All you ever need to know
All you ever need to know about the Christian (Catholic) religion is what would Jesus do.
Thanks Father John, I will
Thanks Father John, I will have to get myself a copy right away!
discuss theology at the well
discuss theology at the well with a Samaritan women many times wed
present a Samaritan, in fact, as generous epitome of loving our neighbor
heal the sick
feed the hungry
go for broke
go forth with nothing but the robe tied around your waist, unarmed, to bring real, actual, truly Good News to the poor
drive the corrupting commercial interests and profiteers out of church
. . . I agree, John, and I
. . . I agree, John, and I look forward to reading this new collection. I had read fully or parts of dozens of books on justice and peace-making before reading 'The Politics of Jesus.' I found it so insightful and so well written that I mentally cleared the decks before reading each evening to give it my full attention. I found it electrifying.
There are very, very few books that have had the same earth-shaking effect on me: Wink's 'Engaging the Powers' (or the shorter 'The Powers That Be'), Branch's 'Parting the Waters,' King's 'Where Do We Go From Here,' Joan Bondurant's "Conquest of Violence," a number of books on Gandhi and King, notably the two written by Richard Deats, a number of books and passages by Gutierrez, Bonino, Sobrino... and Brown's bio of Gutierrez, the collection of Nouwen insights in "Show Me the Way," Robertson's bio of Bonhoeffer, Pema Chodron's "Practicing Peace in Times of War," and an equally short list of fiction, e.g. Barker's Resurrection trilogy on WW I.... Thank you for reminding us of, and lifting up reading with serious clout....
John, Thanks once again for
John, Thanks once again for sharing this. I certainly will get a copy pronto
and continue to share with others in any way possible.
As usual,I deeply
As usual,I deeply apreciated
your comment about John Howard Yoder's writings. But I dare to recommend,also, a very inspiring meditation that is available right here, in NCR: Bishop Thomas Gumbleton's "Everything belongs to God, even Caesar's coins".
Interesting to see from
Interesting to see from whence Father Dear's theology, such as it is, proceeds, not from Catholic teaching and tradition, but from the example of Gandhi, a Hindu, and Mennonite thought. Slowly, but surely, the pieces of the puzzle are fitted together.
Meanwhile, I thank Father for his suggested reading, but I don't think I'll be reading this book.
A quote from Bishop
A quote from Bishop Gumbleton
homily (is a Muslim, or an Animist?):
There's a kind of modern example that I think is very powerful for us to reflect on. Back in 1976 for the World Day of Peace, Jan. 1, 1976, Pope Paul VI wrote what we call the Peace Day Message. In that message, he reflects at one point on the incredible evil of the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and he calls that a butchery of untold magnitude, this total destruction of two whole cities and all of their people. Then he says, "Who is the model for our time?" In the midst of this kind of violence, this kind of killing that you can describe as a butchery of untold magnitude, who is the model?
Do you know who Paul names? Gandhi, a Hindu, not a Christian. There is the model for our time because God is acting through Gandhi. Gandhi shows us the way that Jesus would reject violence, killing, brutality and butchery. God acts through everyone and everything. God has to be present in every aspect of our lives. So when Jesus says, "Give back to God what is God's," it means every part of our life. In our circumstances today, if we want to apply this teaching of Jesus, we can again go back this time to 1971, when Pope Paul VI called together Church leaders from around the whole world and told them, "We need to discuss the question of justice in the world."
We live in a world where there is so much injustice. So few have so much. So many have so little, and billions of people are living in destitution, and many of them in absolute poverty in a situation in a world where, according to God's ways, everyone has a right to a full, human life and to all that you need for a full, human life. That's God's justice. So these church leaders gathered and discussed, and at the end of the document that they produced, they said, "Action for justice and participation in the transformation of the world, these are in our judgment, constitutive dimensions of the preaching of the Gospel."
Justice is served when the
Justice is served when the dictators no longer have the power to oppress their people, and all people enjoy liberty. Justice is served when people have the freedom of economic initiative without government interference in that initiative.
Justice is served when people stop trying to take from those who have earned what they have and give to those who have not earned it. Justice is served when all people have the freedom to enjoy the profits of their just labors without being made to feel guilty about enjoying those profits.
I fight for justice for those who suffer unjustly -- those who daily go to work to earn a living for their family, or themselves, who are engaged in honest efforts to earn a living, who help build society and our economy, and who do all this without complaint; yet who suffer constant attack because others claim that they are greedy or selfish, are not paying "their fair share", are "lucky" or "fortunate" and are guilted into agreeing to confiscatory taxation, resulting in their earnings being taken from them without their consent and being given to those who did absolutely nothing to earn it and who contribute little if anything to society.
THAT is injustice.
Injustice is served when
Injustice is served when people have the freedom of economic initiative without government interference in that initiative.
It is also our rapid decline and ultimate downfall
Read
And Economic Justice For All
from the USCCB
and the pastoral social encyclicals of Pope John XXIII and of Pope Paul VI, as well their successors and predecessors.
For instance, please see from the present supreme pontiff
Deus Caritas Est
Caritas in Vertitate
and especially the second half of the Postsynodal Apostoloic Exhortation
Sacramentum Caritatis
which are all opposite what you find to be injustice here
The Gospel themselves declare what you embrace here unjust.
Clint, are you Catholic?
How?
your loss, Clint, and it
your loss, Clint, and it shows.
Clearly the Reverend Father John Dear SJ, who unlike you or I completed his seminary training in Roman Catholic theology all the way to ordination in a very demanding Jesuit school, has since continually kept current with enriching and deepening his knowledge, wisdom and living our Catholic Faith in her fullness through continual study, prayer, reflection and application. Please read then the book Persistent Peace for an introduction to the Roman Catholic theological pilgrimage undertaken by the Reverend Father John Dear SJ, and continue reading his other works in Roman Catholic spirituality and our integral life process.
His citation here in this one article of other sources and other believers in no way diminishes nor defines nor indicates his own belief, and living, our Roman Catholic Faith integrally. Rather this deepens and informs our Faith. The Faith of the Reverend Father John Dear SJ clearly does not proceed from these three present illustrations, as you falsely allege, but finds reflection and amplification within them. The Faith of the Reverend Father John Dear SJ proceeds from his belief in Jesus Christ, and the Reverend Father John Dear SJ faithfully lives this each day of his life despite all the uncharitable trials and scornful tribulations members of our Church such as yourself pile upon this faithful Servant of God.
Learn, Clint, our Faith, here, with the Reverend Father John Dear SJ.
Attend a retreat with the Reverend Father John Dear SJ at your earliest possible opportunity, as I have, and come to know fully our theology.
Thanks, but I'll stick with
Thanks, but I'll stick with the Reverend Father Robert Sirico and the late Reverend Father Richard John Neuhaus and the imminent theologian Michael Novak and the imminent theologian and political thinker George Weigel, the late Roman Catholic economic thinker Friedrich Hayek and the imminent Catholic political and economic philosopher Edwin Feulner. These are serious Catholic thinkers and writers, many of them are members of the prestigious Mont Pelerin Society. These are men of learning who have spent their lives in study of the political and economic realities of human freedom, the relationship of these with faith and with the teaching of Christ, particularly in the realm of the "preferential option for liberty". They are men of faith, intellect and reason, not given over to emotionalism or the dictatorship of feelings. I would trust their serious, objective study over someone like Father Dear and his utopian dreams any day.
Let me recommend that you take some time to examine seriously their writing and their thought. You might grow somewhat in mature faith and understanding.
Hey CWG, would you trust
Hey CWG, would you trust “their serious, objective study over someone like” Jesus “and His utopian dreams any day”??? It sounds like you should be studying the words of Jesus, not the words of “the Reverend Father Robert Sirico and the late Reverend Father Richard John Neuhaus and the imminent theologian Michael Novak and the imminent theologian and political thinker George Weigel, the late Roman Catholic economic thinker Friedrich Hayek and the imminent Catholic political and economic philosopher Edwin Feulner.”
Ah, but these men do indeed
Ah, but these men do indeed study and pass on the words of Our Lord. Father Dear does not have a monopoly on the message of Our Lord, and the Church herself, the repository of all divine revelation, does not call for an end to all war, nor does she set forth any specific means by which the poor are to be served. Those are prudential matters, something so many "primacy of conscience" folks never understand. The care for the poor is left to each of us, and we accomplish this in the best manner we know how.
However, certain things are indeed absolute, such as, stealing is always wrong...thus stealing from those who earn their just profits and in turn giving it to those who have not earned those profits, and who have no moral claim on those profits, is always wrong.
People have a moral right to the profits of their just labors; if this is true for those working in minimum wage jobs and/or union jobs, why is this not true for the person working as an executive at Microsoft, or GE, or Ford, or JP Morgan Chase? Did Our Lord ever tell us how much money was too much for a person to earn? Did He ever tell us that the government has the power or the right to determine when a person has made "too much" money and thus take a percentage of that money away and give it, like a modern Robin Hood, to the poor? Did Our Lord ever say that we are called to care for the poor, but so long as the government does it for us, we are okay? If you answer in the affirmative to any of those questions, then perhaps you need to return to a closer study of Our Lord's words, and the teaching of the Church as well.
No one person has a monopoly on the Church's social teaching, no one person has a monopoly on how one serves the poor and the needy. And, just in case you forget in the hustle and bustle of "social justice", Our Lord did not preach or minister only to the poor. He also preached and ministered to the wealthy and the powerful. Indeed, He said that it is "easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle than for a rich person to enter the Kingdom of Heaven". In other words, the rich desperately need evangelizing, since the ultimate goal of this life is not to make everyone equal or happy, the ultimate goal of this life is to reasonably happy here, and supremely happy with God in Heaven.
This is an excellent article
This is an excellent article about a John Howard Yoder who has found the message that Jesus was teaching during his public life on this earth. Unfortunately, the leaders in the Catholic Church today seem to be more interested is protecting their power over the people in the pews rather than following Jesus message of love for your neighbor and your enemy. I pray that the Holy Spirit will guide the Church toward the message of Jesus. I have often thought that Mennonite and the Amish people have been a good example of following Jesus' message of non-violence and his command to lead a simple life.
Post new comment