Disarm Now Plowshares

It was Nov. 2. Five friends trudged four hours onto the nuclear weapons naval base at Kitsap-Bangor, Wash. Their destination: SWFPAC, the Strategic Weapons Facility-Pacific. They came to the perimeter, lifted hammers against fences, scattered sunflower seeds and poured their own blood to symbolize the blood spilt by these weapons. They carried banners that read: "Disarm Now."

Security officers appeared in a hurry. And when they reached their quarry they unleashed raw abuse. The peacemakers were put to the ground, handcuffed tight, and reminiscent of America's desert wars, shrouded in hoods. Then off they went blindly for questioning.

They expected a ride to jail, and in the months ahead, a sentence of many long years. But they were met with a favoring wind. Each instead was handed a "ban and bar letter," saying in effect: "Never come around here again. Or else." Undeterred, the peacemakers are out and about, at the gate, leafleting the base's employees.

There have been nearly 100 such "Plowshares" disarmament actions around the world since the first one on Sept. 9, 1980. They are civilly disobedient, nonviolent actions. And they are driven by a single vision, the one made famous by the great oracle of Isaiah 2: "They shall beat their swords into plowshares and study war no more."

The Seattle peacemakers went to the naval base to bring the oracle to fulfillment. They included Susan Crane, 65, of Baltimore, Md., Lynne Greenwald, 60, of Bremerton, Wash., Sacred Heart Sr. Anne Montgomery, 83, of New York City, and two Jesuits, Fr. Steve Kelly, 60, of Oakland, Calif., and Fr. Bill Bischel, 81, of Tacoma, Wash.

With them they brought a statement:

The manufacture and deployment of Trident II missiles, weapons of mass destruction, is immoral and criminal under International Law and, therefore, under United States law," their statement said. "As U.S. citizens we are responsible under the Nuremberg Principles for this threat of first-strike terrorism hanging over the community of nations, rich and poor. Moreover, such planning, preparation, and deployment is a blasphemy against the Creator of life.

The Trident submarine base at Bangor, just 20 miles from Seattle, is home to the largest single stockpile of nuclear warheads in the U.S. arsenal, housing more than 2000 nuclear warheads. In November 2006, the Natural Resources Defense Council declared that the 2,364 nuclear warheads at Bangor are approximately 24 percent of the entire U.S. arsenal. The Bangor base houses more nuclear warheads than China, France, Israel, India, North Korea and Pakistan combined.

Preview NCR's Family Life Issue

Watch this video from NCR Editor Dennis Coday for highlights from our annual Family Life special section.

You won't find these articles on our website. Subscribe now to receive all the content from each biweekly issue.

Nuclear weapons can never be guardians, defenders, or upholders of peace. By their very existence they are endangering the environment, threatening the indiscriminate destruction of life on earth, and depriving the hungry, homeless, and jobless of billions of dollars that could supply human needs throughout the world. They are sheathed in stainless steel and metal coverings that conceal the evil incarnate lying within. They are filled with death-dealing agents that tear apart humans and leave survivors scarred for life. They leave no place for human care for the thousands who suffer and die in agony. Nuclear weapons are a lie. Their protection is an illusion. They must be abolished.

This week I spoke with my Jesuit brother Bill Bichsel about the action. Known as "Bix," he was born and raised in Tacoma, and in 1946 entered the Jesuits. He served for years in nearby parishes and schools.

Thirty years ago, he co-founded the Tacoma Catholic Worker, which offers hospitality and housing to the homeless. And there he continues to live. All told, he has spent two years in prison for other civil disobedience -- at the School of Americas at Fort Benning, Georgia, and, recidivist that he is, at the naval base at Bangor, site of his present action. In 1988, he famously stood up and challenged the lies of George Bush, Sr., running for president and speaking at Seattle University, a Jesuit institution. He was laughed at by Bush, booed by the crowd, and hauled off in handcuffs.

Bix has had two open-heart surgeries, lately, the second of which, he says, "didn't really work." He lives day by day, he says, amazed to be alive, by and large feeling fine but prone to fatigue and reliant on nitroglycerin. Still, he presses on—pouring out his life at the Catholic Worker, traveling this past August to Hiroshima and Nagasaki to participate in peace events there, and now this, at 81, a Plowshares action.

The Hiroshima Peace Park overwhelmed him, he said. He spent much time there meditating on the destruction of Aug. 6, 1945. The commemoration ceremonies in Nagasaki also moved him deeply. "The feeling of sorrow and horror for what the U.S. had done and the resolve to work for abolition of nuclear weapons was strengthened by the experiences," Bix wrote afterwards.

So resolved was he that, on his return home, he wrote his Jesuit provincial. Might he be granted a blessing to participate in this Plowshares action? His provincial wrote back:

We had thought that perhaps your days of protest were over and that you might be able to live the remainder of your life with some rest from civil disobedience. But in Nagasaki you once again heard God calling you into action. I know you have listened hard to that call, praying and discerning for over a year to make sure it truly was from God. Now there is no doubt. Go with my blessing and my prayers, Bill.

Here was a surprising answer. Bix seized permission and made all preparations to proceed.

He went, he said, to confront America's "Auschwitz place," and there witness to Jesus' nonviolence and resurrection. These, he writes, "can turn hearts of stone into hearts of flesh and compassion." More, they can "expel the demon of violence from the hearts and minds of people possessed by the need for nuclear weapons." The power of resurrection will trump the nuclear death machine.

He and his fellow protestors -- "we're not exactly a spring chicken gathering," he wrote -- reflected and prayed for a year. And then they set out for their 4-hour trek, trudging toward the base along a road seldom used. The pace was slow in deference to Bix's frail heart. Steve quipped, "We moved so slow we were invisible."

Finally, they arrived, he said, their destination illuminated like the light of Mordor, the evil headquarters of The Lord of the Rings. They came to a rise and gazed down at the vast byzantine complex, enclosed by a series of fences. "It was a sobering and frightening view."

They stopped and prayed and then proceeded to an outer fence. Bix and Steve cut a hole in the chain links, while Lynne, Anne and Susan hung a banner and planted seeds. Through the hole the five of them squeezed and moved the 10 yards to the second fence, this one festooned with barbed wire sensors.

They cut through this one, too, as dawn was beginning to break. Through the second fence they went, carrying another banner, hammers, and bottles of blood. By now the Marines knew something was amiss, and presently, near the first hole, their humvees lurched to a stop and out they emerged toting automatic weapons.

Anne and Lynne unfurled the banner: "Disarm Now." Susan and Steve hammered on the fence -- their hammers engraved with "love your enemies" -- and sprinkled the blood, a kind of casting of aspersions to name the base as an "Auschwitz place."

Presently more humvees arrived and more marines armed to the teeth. As one, they lifted their weapons and trained them on the five. "We were a stone's throw from the nuclear weapons bunkers," Bix says.

The Marines moved in hard and snapped the handcuffs on tight. "Shut up," barked the soldiers, as the five tried to speak of the lie of nuclear weapons. Then over each of the peacemakers' heads was placed a Guantanamo hood. With the prisoners of Guantanamo and Abu Ghraib, Bix says he felt as one. "What I experienced was a sense of freedom and thanksgiving." He felt a sense of fulfillment of his faith in Jesus' resurrection, such fulfillment, of course, being most possible in a place of hopelessness and death. He said:

For many years, I have had a quiet longing to somehow stand in that place of death with the belief in the transforming power of resurrection. I believe the power of Jesus' resurrection made real by faith can expel the demon power of death which holds Americans in bondage to nuclear weapons.

To those who might regard Bix, 81 and ailing, as headstrong and reckless, Bix counters: "Jesus is not cautious. He doesn't have to mull things over. There are so many things that we church people are cautious about. But I don't hear Jesus being cautious. Jesus is a companion who says ‘I'm with you' as you do these things. And I'm so thankful for that."

I regard it as a miracle they got as far as they did. I'm so grateful, to put it mildly, that the soldiers refrained from opening fire. And I marvel that they are back among us.

But more, I ponder the gift these friends offer, and I'm compelled to ask myself anew, me a Plowshare veteran myself: what steps am I willing to take for the abolition of nuclear weapons? Not everyone is called to do a Plowshares action. Not everyone is called to commit civil disobedience. But everyone is called to do something for the disarmament of the world. Everyone is called to work for the liberation of the oppressed, justice for the poor, nonviolence in place in this disastrous world of violence.

The five are now talking about ways to pressure the United States and the United Nations during the Non-Proliferation Treaty review on May 2 in New York. Perhaps all of us can study the issues, write to the media, demand a date to see the end of nukes.

Maybe even go to New York to let our voice be heard. It will only happen if all of us stand up, step forward, speak out and, like our friends in Seattle, insist together: "Disarm Now!"

***

This week, John's new book, Daniel Berrigan: Essential Writings, appears from Orbis Books. With other recent books, A Persistent Peace and Put Down the Sword, along with Patricia Normile's John Dear On Peace, it is available from www.amazon.com. For information, or to schedule a speaking event, visit: www.johndear.org

It's nice to see those who

It's nice to see those who are willing to speak out against nuclear weapons, something I am very much applaud them for (although their methods are a little counter productive).

I would like to also know, what advocacy and 'civil disobedience' does our Fr. Dear do about the horrible violence that goes on in this country against the unborn? Considering there have been no nuclear attacks since 1945, but there are tens of thousands of unborn children butcherd every year, many simply for the sake of mere convinience, I would like to know what he has done to speak out against that form of violence, as he doesn't seem to think it worth mentioning here.

Does he take any action on this at all? Perhaps those who follow him closely could let me know.

In the past, Fr. Dear has

In the past, Fr. Dear has mentioned doing a sit in at an abortion clinic. He has also routinely expressed his strong opposition to abortion in these columns. You can view his past columns both at this site and at his own website, www.johndear.org For a fuller view of Fr. Dear's understanding of what it means to be "pro-life," please see http://ncronline.org/blogs/road-peace/nonviolence-and-presidential-campaign

Thanks for the links! I'll

Thanks for the links! I'll take a look when I get off of work.

Fr John just barely mentions

Fr John just barely mentions abortion on this site, since most of the contributors here support or grudgingly oppose. He is the typical liberal, may they all soon pass from the scene

My dear Pete the Greek, My

My dear Pete the Greek, My initial reaction to your words is to tell you what a pain in the ass you are, but that wouldn't be very kind would it? So, I will just tell you that I take this personally----- and it hurts. Still, I do wish you peace.

That's too bad. However, i

That's too bad. However, i feel it is a valid concern.

Quick question: How many people have died from nuclear attacks since WWII?

Answer: Zero.

Question: How many children have been murdered by abortion since WWII?

Answer: Millions in the US alone. God knows how many more worldwide.

I heard John Dear speak when

I heard John Dear speak when he came to St. Susanna's Parish in Dedham, MA. In his talk he advocated the position of the Catholic Church: pro-life from conception to natural death. Read John's book, A Persistent Peach, and you will realize this. When John went with a group to the Vatican, Pope John Paul II looked for him in the group, and greeted him warmly, saying, "John Dear, Peace! Peace! Yes!" And he took John's hand in his. No less a pro-life advocate than Pope John Paul II supported John Dear's nonviolent work

Dear Pete the Greek: I am

Dear Pete the Greek: I am glad to note that you find these peacemakers courageous and would wish their zeal to be applied to the protection of life in utero. I would also like to challenge you to advocate for universal health care, that is, for life outside of the womb. I am sure there are as many lives destroyed in your country because of the lack of affordable health care as there are from abortions, so this is not something that can be construed as a hypothetical mushroom cloud scenario; just as with abortions, the evils of a health care system that views health as a commodity rather than a right are happening everyday to real human beings, and they are no less a violation of the right to life. I am sure you will agree that faithful Catholics should be committed as absolutely to life outside of the womb as they are to life in the womb.

As for Fr. Dear, I have no doubt that he supports universal health care.

"I am glad to note that you

"I am glad to note that you find these peacemakers courageous and would wish their zeal to be applied to the protection of life in utero."
- courageous? Not so much. Don't get me wrong, I think their heart is in the right place, but it takes very little courage to do what they did, as they fully know that the WORST that could happen is a night in county lockup. They know full well none of them would get shot for trespass, or anything of the sort. How many times has Fr. John been arrested? TONS. How many years has he served? Last count, I think NONE. Contrast them with the famous picture of the Chinese man standing in front of the advancing tank. He had no assurance that he would even survive (in fact, he only survived because at the last moment, the tank driver couldn't bring himself to run him down. He just as easily could have and I SERIOUSLY doubt he would have suffered consequences for it.)

People protest outside American bases all the time. It's a fairly safe endevor, really. And besides, no one really thinks the US is going to nuke anyone anyway.

How many people try to go to Iran to protest outside their bases? How about Russia? I'm guessing few here do. Afterall, there are REAL consequences to that. The Russians might very well gun you down for cutting wire, or the Iranians might just have you 'vanish'.

In short, I admire the courage it takes for one to stand in front of an advancing T-72, or face being machinegunned or beaten to death, along with your family, for what you beleive in. Facing an evening in lockup for splashing fake blood and planting flowers... yeah, sorry, not exactly storming the barricades there.

Their actions also, in my mind, are counter productive. It makes good theatre, but little else. The average joe, reading about the incident in the paper, will simply shake his head and mutter "don't those hippies know the 70's are over?" The same theatrics fail to serve both PETA and those opposed to abortion. More would be accomplished with prayer, reason and debate than with such silly antics, antics which can many times serve to HARDEN the very hearts they hope to change.

"I would also like to challenge you to advocate for universal health care"
- I believe we should take care of those in our midst who can't take care of themselves. This does NOT mean that I will jump instantly on the bandwagon of any bill they says does this, particularly when many are trying to force abortion coverage into it. In a similar fashion, I support national defense, but I will not jump on the bandwagon of policy that also means running about and invading soverign countries willy-nilly either.

"views health as a commodity rather than a right are happening everyday to real human beings, and they are no less a violation of the right to life."
- not necessarily. Not being able to get dental insurance, for example, is not the same as a human being being cut to pieces while alive. Get a little perspective.

"I am sure you will agree that faithful Catholics should be committed as absolutely to life outside of the womb as they are to life in the womb."
- Of course, but the current administration (and the old) seem to be pushing more for benefits for those outside and to heck with those who are not born.

It boggles my mind, actually. I honestly beleive that if teh Democratic party dropped all their support for abortion, and in fact became totally ANTI-abortion, just doing that, I doubt they would ever lose another election.

The answer to your inquiry

The answer to your inquiry lies within the action, within the message of non-violent protest, but you seem to have your answer already. Maybe you could ask what you yourself are doing, and instead of seeing yourself as separate, see you and Bix and having a common goal. Yes, it is nice to have others willing to speak out, I too applaud him, and I wonder what exactly it accomplishes, as well. The violence to our unborn is an awful, and I will quote Bix, and say that the that the Disarm Now Plowshares Action group believes that " in effect the existence of nuclear weapons is already killing thousands of people who are already deprived of of necessary resources such as food, housing, medical and health resources, employments, education. The money for these resources is going to destructive weapons rather that to necessary things to sustain human lives. They bring death to body and spirit and are used to threaten nuclear death to other people of the world". This culture of death is real, if only by threat of nuclear weapons or by abortion. These are the same issue.

The answer to your inquiry

The answer to your inquiry lies within the action, within the message of non-violent protest, but you seem to have your answer already. Maybe you could ask what you yourself are doing, and instead of seeing yourself as separate, see you and Bix and having a common goal.

Yes, it is nice to have others willing to speak out, I too applaud him, and I wonder what exactly it accomplishes, as well. The violence to our unborn is an awful, and I will quote Bix, and say that the that the Disarm Now Plowshares Action group believes that " in effect the existence of nuclear weapons is already killing thousands of people who are already deprived of of necessary resources such as food, housing, medical and health resources, employments, education. The money for these resources is going to destructive weapons rather that to necessary things to sustain human lives. They bring death to body and spirit and are used to threaten nuclear death to other people of the world". This culture of death is real, if only by threat of nuclear weapons or by abortion.

These are the same issue.

The answer to your inquiry

The answer to your inquiry lies within the action, within the message of non-violent protest, but you seem to have your answer already. Maybe you could ask what you yourself are doing, and instead of seeing yourself as separate, see you and Bix and having a common goal.

Yes, it is nice to have others willing to speak out, I too applaud him, and I wonder what exactly it accomplishes, as well. The violence to our unborn is an awful, and I will quote Bix, and say that the that the Disarm Now Plowshares Action group believes that " in effect the existence of nuclear weapons is already killing thousands of people who are already deprived of of necessary resources such as food, housing, medical and health resources, employments, education. The money for these resources is going to destructive weapons rather that to necessary things to sustain human lives. They bring death to body and spirit and are used to threaten nuclear death to other people of the world". This culture of death is real, if only by threat of nuclear weapons or by abortion.

These are the same issue.

The answer to your inquiry

The answer to your inquiry lies within the action, within the message of non-violent protest, but you seem to have your answer already. Maybe you could ask what you yourself are doing, and instead of seeing yourself as separate, see you and Bix and having a common goal.

Yes, it is nice to have others willing to speak out, I too applaud him, and I wonder what exactly it accomplishes, as well. The violence to our unborn is an awful, and I will quote Bix, and say that the that the Disarm Now Plowshares Action group believes that " in effect the existence of nuclear weapons is already killing thousands of people who are already deprived of of necessary resources such as food, housing, medical and health resources, employments, education. The money for these resources is going to destructive weapons rather that to necessary things to sustain human lives. They bring death to body and spirit and are used to threaten nuclear death to other people of the world".

This culture of death is real, if only by threat of nuclear weapons or by abortion.

These are the same issue.

I think Bix has demonstrated

I think Bix has demonstrated what it is to "lose" oneself. He is a powerful and honorable figure, a truly Christlike figure. I think he has already 'seen the promised land" I thank him and you for modeling this for those of us who are still muddling along. God bless!

Another commentary from a

Another commentary from a priest whose heart and best intentions are in the right place, but who clearly does not understand reality. Saying "Disarm Now!" is tantamount to saying to every tinpot dictator, every lawless regime on the planet, "Please, come invade us!"

Nuclear weapons have kept the peace for 65 years. During the Cold War, the only thing that prevented the Soviets from launching a full-scale invasion and conquest of West Germany, West Berlin, and Western Europe (not to mention the continental US) was the sure and certain knowledge that such actions would result in full-scale warfare, which would, inevitably, have led to nuclear war. The knowledge that this could, and probably would, be the case kept the peace during the Cold War on both sides.

The continued existence of the State of Israel is due mostly to their neighbors' knowledge that Israel has nuclear weapons and is not afraid to use them. This certainty has limited the attacks and atrocities on Israel committed by their enemies and insured that, despite loss of life that is serious and awful, the State of Israel remains secure for the most part.

The knowledge that the US, France, Britain and their allies have nuclear arms prohibits rogue states from launching full-scale attacks on third world and second world nations. The fact that the US and her allies possess only one type of weapon of mass destruction (nuclear devices) insures that those nations possessing chemical and biological weapons of mass destruction do not use them on the US and her allies, since they recognize that a proportionate response would include use of nuclear weapons.

In short, nuclear weapons provide defensive capabilities for the US, her allies, and have done so since they were first invented. Further, the hundreds of millions of innocent people whose governments would not hesitate to use violence against their neighbors and enemies are protected from such needless suffering by the sure and certain knowledge that the US and her allies possess the ultimate weapon.

Without the nuclear deterrence force of the US and her allies, millions of the poor would be engaged in and suffering from warfare; millions of people would be oppressed by their governments and the Soviet Union and Warsaw Pact would still exist; millions of innocents would have died, and be dying, from increased violence; the State of Israel would likely not exist and the Cold War would almost certainly be white hot. Granted it would be wonderful to accomplish all of this without the need for a nuclear deterrent, but for the present moment, in the real world that we live in and not the fantasy world of Fr. Dear and his compatriots, the nuclear deterrence is the only protection that many have from total tyranny, oppression, war and death.

Finally, I do not find anything laudable or peaceable about violating federal law. People who break onto army, naval, or air force bases in order to bang on walls and fences and throw blood on the fences and grounds as some sort of "protest" are criminals, pure and simple.

"Finally, I do not find

"Finally, I do not find anything laudable or peaceable about violating federal law. People who break onto army, naval, or air force bases in order to bang on walls and fences and throw blood on the fences and grounds as some sort of "protest" are criminals, pure and simple."
- you bring up a good point, Clint. People here applaud such actions done by these 'peace protestors'.

BUT

I wonder if they would support or condemn such actions taken by abortion protestors.

I think we all know the answer.

Here is what Arun Gandhi said

Here is what Arun Gandhi said obout the "plowshares actions":

Arun Gandhi said: "You can quote me as saying Mahatma Gandhi would disagree with the Plowshares actions because they employ tactics of secrecy and destruction of property. I also think locking up the most courageous and devoted peace leaders for long prison terms is a way of weakening the peace movement. Those leaders could do much more for peace outside of jail than in it." ( The Jesus Journal - Summer 1995 - No. 77 - page 44 )

This will really help me with

This will really help me with my preparations for Advent - Jesus began his nonviolent career in a stable in occupied territory. If we are not called to civil disobedience we can be in solidarity in our prayer and supporting those called in practical ways as well as re-telling their stories and being witness to the birth of new life that comes from the work of liberation, justice and peace.

Thank you to Fr. John Dear,

Thank you to Fr. John Dear, and the other good Jesuits and protesters listed in today's article against the nukes.

I will try to do whatever I can in this work against nuclear arms. Even if it's only mentioning today's NCR article to as many as possible.

And constant prayers for peace and for our tax money to be spent for food and medical care, not stupid American Weapons of Mass Destruction!

Fulfill the intended

Fulfill the intended

Once again, another good

Once again, another good accounting of nonviolent civil disobediene.
Americans love to support violence because God will has not struck back at our ignorance.
As one trained in the Roman Catholic church, I feel that the death of Jesus was more proof that Jesus was for the nonviolent people.

I forgot who said it but the "the problem is not civil disobedience, the problem is that we are civilly obedient."

Peace

One thing I do like about Fr.

One thing I do like about Fr. John is that he doesn't seem, at least from what I've seen, to bend his beliefs to form the mold of the repubs or the demos, unlike so many have. Remember all those peace protests, 'end the war now' marches, etc. that took place during Bush's reign? Where are they now? Nothing has changed except who is issuing the orders. This proved to me that most of those 'anti-war' groups were merely 'anti-Bush', nothing more.

Fr. John seems to go after all the politicians. I'm sure he will have plenty to say on THIS, the latest act of the secular left's messiah.

Notice to Fr. John Christ was

Notice to Fr. John Christ was not a pacificist, did say lay down and let your enemies crush as you would do.

Pete the greek points out a

Pete the greek points out a serious flaw of the "prolife" movement in this country in that the full "seamless garment" is disregarded; that life extends beyond the womb. Witness the general support of the war in Iraq, the resistance to meaningful healthcare reform, and the opposition to full equal status to everybody.
Fr John Dear seems to be almost unique in his consistency to living the Gospel of the non-violent Jesus.

Actually, I would think many

Actually, I would think many people here violate their own 'seamless garment' rule. People like brad evans, in the post directly below yours TJGray, seem very much against nuclear weapons, but is also very much against people trying to stop the legalized butchering of innocent children.

The 'seamless garment' arguement is applied very selctively and, I would say, in a VERY politically correct fashion around here it seems.

Stay the hell away from

Stay the hell away from abortion clinics!
Poor women have enough problems without having to dodge fanatics.

Thank God none of the young

Thank God none of the young marines were hurt in this infantile exercise.

The answer to your inquiry

The answer to your inquiry lies within the action, within the message of non-violent protest, but you seem to have your answer already. Maybe you could ask what you yourself are doing, and instead of seeing yourself as separate, see you and Bix and having a common goal.

Yes, it is nice to have others willing to speak out, I too applaud him, and I wonder what exactly it accomplishes, as well. The violence to our unborn is an awful, and I will quote Bix, and say that the that the Disarm Now Plowshares Action group believes that " in effect the existence of nuclear weapons is already killing thousands of people who are already deprived of of necessary resources such as food, housing, medical and health resources, employments, education. The money for these resources is going to destructive weapons rather that to necessary things to sustain human lives. They bring death to body and spirit and are used to threaten nuclear death to other people of the world".

This culture of death is real, if only by threat of nuclear weapons or by abortion.

These are the same issue.

I'm a new Catholic. I'm not

I'm a new Catholic. I'm not trying to be a jerk, so please be patient.

From what I understand, the Catholic Church is "officially" pro-life (in regards to abortion), and anti-nuclear war. This makes sense to me, and I agree with it.

But from reading the comments, I'm reminded that pro-life Catholics and anti-nuke Catholics are not on friendly terms. I've noticed in my own Church, too - soup kitchen and anti-nuke activites are highly respected, but if a person volunteers for "40-Days for Life," he/she is ostracized and harrassed.

These are ALL "life-related" topics, aren't they? I just don't understand the heavy opposition to pro-life activities.

Post new comment

NCR Comment code:

  1. Be respectful. Do not attack the writer. Take on the idea, not the messenger.
  2. Use appropriate language. Avoid vulgarities and slurs.
  3. Keep to the point. Deliberate digressions don't aid the discussion.

For more detailed guidelines, visit our User Guidelines page.

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
(if you have one; if not, leave this blank)
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <font> <swf> <swf list>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You may use <swf file="song.mp3"> to display Flash files inline

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This is to prove you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.