Ben Salmon and the Army of Peace

One of the inspiring Christians of the last century was Ben Salmon, the American Catholic conscientious objector to World War I. Whenever my spirits sag over the apparently dim prospects for peace, I think of Ben, layman, husband, and father, peacemaker and resister. His was a lonely, steadfast stretch of discipleship to the nonviolent Jesus. I’ve thought often of Ben and taken his example to heart.

Imagine! Long before Mahatma Gandhi, Franz Jagerstatter, Dorothy Day, Dr. King or Thomas Merton -- before the Catholic Worker or Pax Christi or NCR, before Archbishop Romero, Vatican II or the Bishops’ Pastoral Letter on Peace -- this lone man stood and said that because of Jesus, he would not be a soldier. Right here in the United States.

Ben came to my attention in 1990, during ceremonies for the Pax Christi Book Award, which I used to direct. Gordon Zahn had nominated a biography on Salmon, written by one of Zahn’s graduate students, Torin Finney. It’s titled Unsung Hero of the Great War (Paulist Press, 1989). Our committee awarded Torin the prize. Our thinking was that perhaps more people might come to know this singular man, Ben Salmon.

Just a few years ago, I was delighted to see Ben featured in The Sign of Peace, my favorite U.S. journal. I gleaned more on the man as I pored over the rare photos, as I took in the synopsis of his life, some of his writings and an interview with his daughter Elizabeth, today a Maryknoll sister in Nicaragua. (For the full issue, where I gleaned these details, and other information, see: www.catholicpeacefellowship.org.)

The story begins April 6, 1917. It was the day President Woodrow Wilson, the “peace president,” declared war on Germany, and the next day, Congress ratified the decision, bringing the United States. into World War I. Two weeks later, Cardinal James Gibbons of Baltimore, the de facto head of the U.S. Catholic church, issued a letter, to this effect: all Catholics were to support the war.

(Icon by Fr. William Hart McNichols)(Icon by Fr. William Hart McNichols)The letter was soon followed by the founding of the U.S. Bishops’ “National Catholic War Council,” which set out to mobilize Catholics for, what it called, “war work.” Peacework? Peacemaking? That was never an option. (According to historians, this War Council eventually led to the creation of the U.S. Catholic Conference of Bishops.)

Preview NCR's Family Life Issue

Watch this video from NCR Editor Dennis Coday for highlights from our annual Family Life special section.

You won't find these articles on our website. Subscribe now to receive all the content from each biweekly issue.

As the darkness descended, on June 5, 1917, 28 year-old-Ben Salmon took up his pen. He wrote the president, saying he would refuse to fight. “Regardless of nationality,” he wrote,

all men are my brothers. God is “our father who art in heaven.” The commandment “Thou shalt not kill” is unconditional and inexorable. … The lowly Nazarene taught us the doctrine of non-resistance, and so convinced was he of the soundness of that doctrine that he sealed his belief with death on the cross. When human law conflicts with Divine law, my duty is clear. Conscience, my infallible guide, impels me to tell you that prison, death, or both, are infinitely preferable to joining any branch of the Army.

A brave missive in those days. Congress, suddenly fervid for war, wasted little time getting a new law on the books. It outlawed activities “detrimental to the war effort” -- public anti-war statements, anti-war literature, utterances that might encourage draft resistance -- all these punishable by up to 20 years behind bars.

Under the law, the authorities arrested hundreds, harassed thousands. And when challenged, finally, the law was upheld by the Supreme Court. Necessary for “national security,” they decreed.

Salmon had voted for Wilson. Like most, he had expected the president to lead the country to peace. And when the brilliant and upright candidate came to power and unleashed war, Salmon’s disappointment burned deep. Wilson outdid even his hawkish predecessors in warmaking. (A pattern, need it be added, quite obvious today.)

Undeterred by the chill on the air, Ben rose to leadership in Denver’s “People’s Council for Democracy and Peace,” a national anti-war organization. In defiance of the law, he wrote letters, gave speeches, and distributed pamphlets. Soon, he caught the attention of The New York Times, which hotly denounced him. He had become notorious.

Meantime, the gears of war turned feverishly, with a kind of census going full tilt to unearth prospective recruits. On Christmas day, Ben’s Army registration questionnaire arrived. Ben returned it, unfilled-out, accompanied by a letter explaining why. “Let those that believe in wholesale violation of the commandment, ‘Thou Shalt not Kill’ make a profession of faith by joining the army of war. I am in the army of peace, and in this army, I intend to live and die.”

Jan. 15, 1918, Denver policemen arrived at his door. The papers hurled slander his way, all sulfur and fire. The Knights of Columbus, the prominent Catholic lay association, in a fit of indignation revoked his membership. In March he was tried and convicted. And then the sentence came down -- nine months in the county jail.

Matters, already grim, spiraled downward quickly. While out on appeal, his draft notice arrived. Report for induction, it ordered, in three days. A second refusal, a second arrest. And this time he found himself in the clutches of the military authorities, who hustled him into solitary confinement at Fort Logan, Colo.

At Fort Logan he was ordered to work. Again he refused. What to do about this, a trouble-maker in their midst? Guards and other prisoners nearly lynched him that night. And so the authorities put him in chains and trundled him to Camp Funston in Kansas. There, they told him, he would face court martial for “desertion and propaganda.” For desertion? “I’ve never actually been inducted,” he said. No matter.

The preliminary hearing was held in Iowa, and an offer of leniency proffered, a kind of quid pro quo. Again, no. He would make no deals with the military. He would rather face court martial -- and defend himself. It was held on July 24, 1918, and in his own defense he argued three points. 1) He had been inducted illegally; 2) he was responsible for a dependent wife and mother; and 3) conscription violated the First and Fifth Amendments.

The court found him guilty; the verdict came down in minutes. The sentence…was death.

Second thoughts came to the court, and before long they commuted the sentence to 25 years in prison at hard labor. More second thoughts came and lures and enticements. Be a legal clerk in an army office, they offered, and no more troubles. All charges dropped. His wife, having just given birth, urged him to accept, but the recalcitrant Ben again said no. Even non-combatant service, he said, entails cooperating with an institution “antithetical to Christianity.”

They hauled him under heavy guard to Leavenworth, Kan., He arrived Oct. 9, 1918, and a month later an armistice was declared. The war was over. But not for Ben; his imprisonment had just begun.

He was assigned to a unit comprised of hundreds of COs and there, with them, expected to work. He was quickly consigned to “The Hole” -- solitary confinement -- when he refused all orders. Five months he suffered in a dark, rat-infested cell. No toilet but a pail, bread and water his only food.

Matters grew worse yet when in June, 1919, the authorities transferred him to a military prison in Utah, where sadistic guards took a dim view of conscientious objectors. The guards inflicted beatings, withheld food, and kept prisoners underdressed against the cold.

Still, he refused to buckle, and instead pushed things to their logical conclusion. A hunger strike. He wrote to the Secretary of War: “Unless you [release me], you will cause my death from starvation, for I cannot honestly continue to support [the Greek war god] Mars as I have in the past. I now realize that even the tiny bit of assistance that I was rendering in the way of accepting your food was too much.”

And he added: “Christ’s doctrine to overcome evil with good” is the “most effective solution for individual and societary ills that has ever been formulated. It is a practical policy…My life, my family, everything is now in the hands of God. His will be done.”

Two weeks later, death loomed, and he asked to see a priest. The priest arrived, but refused to offer him Communion, hear his confession or anoint him. Two other priests arrived some days later. And, after sizing things up, one of them agreed to the request for Communion. The sacrament was done. When word made its way back to the diocese, a fury descended. The priest was sent packing. Off to minor and punitive assignments in Oregon for pitying a traitor. Another instance of church colluding with warmongering state.

Force-feeding followed -- 135 days of it -- then a one-way ticket to Washington, D.C., to St. Elizabeth’s Hospital for the Insane.

While there he refused to languish; he kept busy -- thinking, praying and writing. From the ACLU archives we have the fruits of Ben’s efforts, a 200-page, single-spaced essay on the fallacy of the just war. Much of it a refutation of the Catholic Encyclopedia’s article on war by Father Macksey, a Jesuit from the Gregorian University in Rome. Point by point Ben refutes the lofty scholar.

“Either Christ is a liar or war is never necessary, and very properly assuming that Christ told the truth, it follows that the State is without [in the words of Father Macksey] ‘judicial authority to determine when war is necessary,’ because it is never necessary.”

Much of Salmon’s thinking depended on the Apostle Paul. “Overcome evil with good,” admonished Paul. (Rom 12:21).

We do not attempt to overcome lying with lies; we overcome it with truth. We do not try to overcome curses with curses, but we overcome with silence or with words of friendship. Sickness is not overcome with sickness; it is overcome with health… Anger is overcome with meekness, pride by humility. And the successful way to overcome the evil of war is by the good of peace, a steadfast refuse to render evil for evil.

A sad matter when faithfulness, nonviolence, sanity, as it was in Jesus’ own day, is regarded as -- insanity.

Eventually, in the cultural mind there passed an assuaging of adamant feelings. The newly formed ACLU had ignored his many pleas for help, but gradually they changed their tune. The New York Times, previously Ben’s sharp detractor, wrote about his plight and hunger strike. The well-respected Msgr. John Ryan of Catholic University got wind of the news and personally lobbied the Secretary of War.

The War Department, in a feeble way, finally relented -- they would release 33 conscientious objectors. Ben would be among them. Thanksgiving 1920, he was released and, from the army he never joined, dishonorably discharged. The news made front pages across the nation.

Persona non grata thereafter, he struggled to find good work. And when the Depression set in, he and his family landed in deep poverty. His health never recovered -- the forced feedings had taken their toll -- and in 1932 he caught pneumonia and died.

The astonishing life and times of Ben Salmon, all but unheard of in our day and age.

A few years ago, my friend Bruce MacIntosh of Taos, N.M., wrote an inspiring screenplay based on Ben’s life. Bruce sent me a copy of Ben’s original manuscript, which I treasure as a kind of long lost Dead Sea Scroll. [If anyone knows a Hollywood producer who might be interested in Bruce’s screenplay, please contact me!]

Meanwhile, The Sign of Peace concludes that Ben Salmon isn’t just a faithful Catholic, but a “confessor of the faith.” I would go farther. I regard him as a saint for the ages. He took on the nation, he took on Christendom. He took them on in reverence toward the Christ of peace. He shows us what allegiance to the nonviolent Jesus looks like.

Since Ben’s days, decades have been born, decades have died. And sad to say, little has changed.

A handful of great peacemakers have been given us: Franz Jagerstatter and Dorothy Day, Philip Berrigan and Howard Zinn. Yet most bishops and priests, and following their lead, most of the laity, still cheer on state-sanctioned mass murder, especially when committed in Jesus' name. They go along, they rock few boats.

More, among our military, a third are Catholic. Vastly more theologians than not, like Father Macksey, pursue justifications for war. I get the feeling that the bishops wish they could start a new “National Catholic War Council;” they certainly haven’t formed a “Peace Council.” And today, as in Ben’s own day, an eloquent president, elected on promises of peace, has taken warmaking to new heights. The times, Ben’s and ours, run parallel. And that being the case, one of the brightest beacons we have is Ben.

His example urges us to refuse to cooperate with the warmaking state. Is the stand costly, are the stakes high? No matter. “Peacemaking is hard, hard almost as war,” to quote the poet. The vocation falls to us, Christians everywhere, to follow the nonviolent Jesus.

May we all be inspired to join Ben’s Army of Peace. It is the witness most required by our times.

************

To contribute to Catholic Relief Services’ “Fr. John Dear Haiti Fund,” go to: http://donate.crs.org/goto/fatherjohn. Next week, John will speak in Lexington, Ky., on March 4, and lead a retreat in Atlanta, Ga., “The Road to Peace,” on March 5-6 (see: www.paxchrististjude.webs.com He will also lead “The Gospel According to John,” April 30-May 2, near Stroudsburg, Pa., see www.kirkridge.org; and“Gandhi, King, Day and Merton,” at Ghost Ranch Center, Abiquiu, N.M., see www.ghostranch.org. John’s latest book, Daniel Berrigan: Essential Writings (Orbis), along with other recent books, A Persistent Peace and Put Down Your Sword, as well as Patricia Normile’s John Dear On Peace, are available from www.amazon.com. For further information, or to schedule a lecture, go to www.johndear.org

An interesting biography of a

An interesting biography of a deeply committed individual. Certainly, one can understand his confusion over, and refusal to participate in, World War I, which was a deeply flawed and unnecessary war.

However, I take exception to Mr. Salmon's attempt to "debunk" the just war theory. Great saints, including St. Augustine, postulated and supported the just war theory, knowing that sometimes St. Paul's statement to "overcome evil with good" means that good people have to fight evil. One can surely see that Hitler, for example, would not have been stopped by hunger strikes, protest rallies and sit-ins. Sometimes, one has to resort to the last possible resort, that of war, to stop evil. The Catholic Church understands this truth, great saints throughout the Church's history understand this truth.

I think the important thing

I think the important thing to keep in mind is that as saints go, the Church has BOTH: Warriors and Pacifists.

We have patron saints of peace:
St. Francis of Assisi
St. Norbert
ect.

And we have patron saints of soldiers:
St. Joan of Arc
St. Maurice
ect.

And praise be to God for it!

St Francis preached for men

St Francis preached for men to go to the crusades...

That is true. I actually

That is true. I actually wasn't saying that these were teachers of pacifism or were pacifists themsleves, but that the Church holds them up as patron saints of peace.

That is NOT true. In fact,

That is NOT true.

In fact, Saint Francis took direct action against the so-called Crusades by walking to sit and pray for peace with the Sultan, the same direct action which inspires us now, which inspires for example the Reverend Father John Dear SJ to go to Gaza.

It's when he got back to his own convents that he found discord, and ripped the roof off the joint.

There ought to be a requirement that every comment slapped upon NCR bear footnotes with substantial and reliable references to primary resources in order to stop these deliberate lies and calumnies and falsified hagiographies.

That would clean up much of the disciples of Fr. Z and these who make up truth to their own conveniences.
frère charles du désert OSB OBLAT (Congrégation de Subiaco)

A little more info on this

A little more info on this episode of St. Francis.

"At the second general chapter (May, 1219) Francis, bent on realizing his project of evangelizing the infidels, assigned a separate mission to each of his foremost disciples, himself selecting the seat of war between the crusaders and the Saracens. With eleven companions, including Brother Illuminato and Peter of Cattaneo, Francis set sail from Ancona on 21 June, for Saint-Jean d'Acre, and he was present at the siege and taking of Damietta. After preaching there to the assembled Christian forces, Francis fearlessly passed over to the infidel camp, where he was taken prisoner and led before the sultan. According to the testimony of Jacques de Vitry, who was with the crusaders at Damietta, the sultan received Francis with courtesy, but beyond obtaining a promise from this ruler of more indulgent treatment for the Christian captives, the saint's preaching seems to have effected little."

From the Catholic Encyclopedia.

Do you have a reference where it says he sat with the sultan and prayed for peace? I actually would like to read about that.

Hey, Pete! I have been busily

Hey, Pete! I have been busily reviewing the primary Franciscan documents and I fail to find where he writes in his constitutions (which are mainly Gospel citations after all) or anywhere else, anything at all resembling "If you meet a Muslim on the road, kill him!"

Can you please help me out here?

Would it be in Brother Ugolino's Little Flowers of Saint Francis? Would it be in Rossellini's 1952 film of these Flowers?

While admittedly noncanonical, might I in exchange suggest you meditate the various excellent commentaries of the beautiful "Prayer of Saint Francis" including, if not Cardinal Spellman's, that of Friar Boff published in 2001 by Orbis Books under the title oddly enough: The Prayer of Saint Francis: A Message of Peace for the World Today.

Perhaps we might even all join hands in singing it, excpet of course for the guitar player, whose hands are otherwise occupied.

Please see also from the same author the excellent Saint Francis: A Model for Human Liberation, first published by Crossroad in 1982 and reissued by Orbis in a deluxe 25th anniversary edition in 2006, the true spirit of Saint Francis of Assisi by a very faithful and learned son, though nothing about killing Muslims that I can find, as you insist without reference.

"Hey, Pete! I have been

"Hey, Pete! I have been busily reviewing the primary Franciscan documents and I fail to find where he writes in his constitutions (which are mainly Gospel citations after all) or anywhere else, anything at all resembling "If you meet a Muslim on the road, kill him!""
- That's because he never did that. I misread the source I was reading at the time, as I read in haste (never a good thing to do).

The incident I was reading about was when St. Francis was preaching to the crusaders at Damietta before battle, trying to convince them NOT to fight the enxt day as he had a vision that the battle would end in disaster. He was NOT successful, unfortunatly.

Not true! He was successful

Not true!

He was successful in the person of the Servant of God Benjamin Salmon.

May he be so successful within each one of us, even now in this darkening day.

frère charles du désert OSB OBLAT (Congrégation de Subiaco)

Yes, I too have often thought

Yes, I too have often thought about the points you are making in your comment. But I keep returning to the question of the power of prayer and fasting as expressed by Christ himself. Isn't war an admission of the failure of prayer? It is a question with which I struggle.

Also, You speak accurately of St Augustain and others who have supported the Just War Theory - a theory which is, more often than not, violated. But, when speaking of Augustian, please keep in mind that there are areas where today The Church would not be in agreement with Augustian positions (ie. his feelings towards the Jews). Therefore, why should his attitude towards war be automatically accepted and not reviewed? And, finally, there has been many great figures throughout the Church's history who have taken up the banner of pacifism. Are these people not to be respected as well? Or, perhaps, even seen as prophets?

I don't have an answer to these questions, but to see how willing most are to talk of the Church's Just War Theory and then be so silent when it is violated, makes me wonder all the more about their committment to The Chruch's teachings.

Peace and prayers

Clint please, we don't know

Clint please, we don't know that Hitler wouldn't have been stopped had people engaged in massive collective forms of non violent resistance. Communism fell when no one expected that to happen.

I suppose the underlying truth is that people do not really believe there is any practical power in walking the Gospel message of love. Better to walk the non Gospel message of fear, hate, and war.

Ultimately war suggests man's inability to trust in the truth of the God he professes to believe in. Catholicism is no different. Better to bless the bombs you can touch, than trust in the love your fear prevents you from feeling.

Granted we do not know for

Granted we do not know for certain whether or not Hitler would have been stopped by "massive collective forms of non violent resistance". However, we can guess, based on Hitler and his followers' methods, that the response to hunger strikes and other forms of demonstrations, sit-ins, etc., would likely to have been mass murder. I cannot imagine that Hitler or any of his followers, who demonstrated no compunction whatsoever to kill babies, little kids, old people, etc. would care one whit about the wholesale slaughter of non violent protesters. Granted, though, all we can do is guess because the world leaders, from the Pope, to the President of the USA, the Premier of the Soviet Union, the Prime Minister of Great Britain, etc. were wise enough to know that military intervention was necessary.

Communism fell as a direct result to a number of factors. First, the failure of the Soviet military in Afghanistan, a failure exacerbated by the supplying of military hardware to the Afghan resistance by the US (thanks, Charlie Wilson!). Second, the increased military expenditure by the US and her allies under President Reagan led the USSR to increase its military spending to keep up. The Soviet economy simply could not sustain such spending. Third, for forty years, the West effectively isolated the Soviet Union and its satellite nations, stopping its intended spread to other nations, and forcing the Warsaw Pact to look inward for economic survival and limiting the ability of Warsaw Pact nations to expand its economic base. Fourth, the intrinsic contradictions of Communism, most clearly expressed by a group of leaders who espouse equality and justice, while reserving for themselves luxuries impossible for the majority of citizens and imposing the most unjust society in the last 500 years, could not be sustained. Finally, and perhaps most importantly, the election of Pope John Paul II, the Great, an implacable enemy of Communism and his tacit and open support for Poland's union "Solidarity", the consecration of Russia to Our Lady, and the happy intersection of the Pope, President Reagan and Prime Minister Thatcher all led to a "perfect storm" which could end only one way.

On a related note, it is true that no one expected the rapidity of the fall of the Soviet Union and the Warsaw Pact. However, it cannot be disputed that Pope John Paul the Great, President Reagan, and many, many others never doubted that the Soviet Union would indeed collapse. It was never a question of "if" but just a question of "when".

Finally, warfare always constitutes a failure. No one ever wants war, but sometimes war is the final resort. Diplomacy was tried in World War II. Neville Chamberlain and the other European leaders gave Hitler everything he wanted in an effort to stem the war that they feared was coming. But, in this instance, the result was only to embolden Hitler, not to subdue him; even less to turn him from an enemy to a friend. War should never be the first option; neither should it ever be absolutely ruled out.

Clint, your analyis on the

Clint, your analyis on the fall of communism left out the contribution of Solidarity and the courage of those individuals who took a personal stand with no guarantee they wouldn't be killed or imprisoned.

You also ignored my last two paragraphs.

Actually, Hitler was stopped

Actually, Hitler was stopped without much or any killing in Denmark and Norway. If the churches in Germany had said no to him, he could have been stopped. But the main issue is faith, is it strong enough to stop evil without evil means. We can't stop hate with hate, and certainly the war was all about hate. We are called to be faithful, not successful. Could the Nazis have done more harm than WWII? Probably not. Should other nations have attacked us for what we've been doing to our natives since our nation's beginning? War has never brought good. Lets try something else, especially since peace is what God promised to those who really follow him and sacrifice themselves for his truth, as did Ben.

"We can't stop hate with

"We can't stop hate with hate, and certainly the war was all about hate."

We can't stop hate with hate, that is totally true. Which is why in the Church's teaching on war it also stresses that all hatred and dehumanizing of the enemy is to be avoided totally.

The Nazis occupied those

The Nazis occupied those nations from 1940 until 1945. He was not stopped there at all. And, many bishops in Germany spoke out against Hitler, including Archbishop Groeber and Bishop Berning, to name just two. The German bishops wrote several pastoral letters denouncing Hitler's tactics and his embrace of war and his murder of Jewish citizens and other political opponents.

God promised us peace, that is true, but He never specified where that peace would be. And, more than world peace, He was promising primarily inner peace. But, that's beside the point.

Thank you for your comments.

Thank you for your comments. Unfortunately, there are people who have spent their entire lives in religious communities, under the protection of others, who prefer to ignore this truth, as well as the long Catholic tradition concerning just wars.

Just as Pope JP II declared

Just as Pope JP II declared he could no longer find any circumstance under which in the modern world the death penalty can be applied morally, the same with the so-called "just war theory."

Read the USCCB's "Challenge of Peace: God's Promise and Our Response a Pastoral Letter on War and Peace" available in several editions and prices on amazon, which clearly lays out the requirements of a "just war." For a few examples, we no longer see the possibility of proportionality nor discrimination as we so clearly see in Gaza and in the Afghan and Iraq.

Before carelessly claiming the "just war theory" permits that which it condemns, study it.

There are no just war soldier-saints, especially not Saint Maurice and particularly not Joan. I notice Saint Martin of Tours does not make your muster here, Pete, and properly not.

But we have the Reverend Father John Dear SJ declaring courageously and faithfully Jesus' Gospel of Peace, and DEO GRATIAS!

Sooo.... St. Joan of Arc

Sooo.... St. Joan of Arc never led soldiers? Really? REALLY?

Actually, St. Martin IS a patron Saint of soldiers too. Why should he not be? If you have an issue with him being a patron saint of soldiers, you should take it up with the Church.

As for who 'made the list', I simply searched for the patron saints and grabbed the first two I found in each category.

As for the Just War Theory, we must remember NOT to treat it as if it is some kind of BARE MINIMUM list of requirements that, once met, allow an 'anything goes' mentality. That is totally wrong, as the Church teaches.

The Catechism (which JPII approved and promulgated) speaks first of how all that can possibly be done to avoid conflict and war must be done. The II Vatican Council speaks on this as well, as do many other documents.

Pete, dude, thanks for

Pete, dude, thanks for proving my point, except you are wrong as well about Sainte Jeanne D'Arc, and I suggest you begin by reading the transcripts of her "enhanced" interrogations by the British and her mistreatment (as usual) by the hierarchy.

Your point WAS that St. Joan

Your point WAS that St. Joan led soldiers?

I actually have read her history.

Robert, I am not quite sure

Robert, I am not quite sure what comments you are supporting, but I would like to add that I wish those who take the position of talking about the Catholic tridition concerning just wars would be willing to speak out against those wars that don't fit the just war theory. I just never seem to see that happening. It would at least be a begining and would narrow the number of wars Catholics participate in to a very few. Yes, a begining.

What a truly inspiring story

What a truly inspiring story - Ben Salmon - a true disciple of the Nazarene - the ultimate voice of peacemaking. At the same time what an indictment of the Catholic Church and its leadership - which helps to explain how even to today (with so few exceptions) the leadership of the church values patriotism over fidelity to the gospels, cooperation with evil over witness to equality and freedom of conscience. Ben Salmon should be seen not just as a witness but also as a martyr, one whose example must shine from the mountain tops.

I have always found it

I have always found it "interesting" that the Church had/needed a peace group--Pax Christi. The Peace of Christ should be the ENTIRE Church! But, Cardinal Spellman used to bless the bombs going to Vietnam at the harbor in NY, so many Bishops today support the war, they don't speak out against it. They truly do not follow the teachings of Christ.

"They truly do not follow the

"They truly do not follow the teachings of Christ."
- It is good to see someone who is without sin casting a stone. Congrats!

1st of all, the Church has many groups with many different focus. You might as well say "Why does the Church has groups that work in shelters and soup kitchens, we should all work in shelters and soup kitchens!" Or, "Why does the Church have groups that are devoted to hours of prayer? We should ALL be spending hours in prayer!"

Because not everyone can do every thing. As I mentioned before, one of the beautiful things about the Church is that we have saints of all kinds: Married and Religious, Pacifist and Warrior, etc. Perhaps you need to understand that the Churh teaches all men to seek peace, not that we must all be pacifists. Just like the Church teaches we must care for the poor, but not that we, every one of us, must abandon everything else we do in our lives, family, friends, any other responsibilities, and all devote every waking hour of every day working in a soup kitchen.

This isn't new.

I urge you to read the catechism of the Church on these matters, it will help you understand.

And then we had the brave and

And then we had the brave and brilliant Bishop Daniel Reilly in Groton promising to preach against the Trident subs at the blessing he was called to give.

The Vatican quickly hustled him to Worcester . . .

it is always dangerous for me

it is always dangerous for me to read this column, as it pinches my book budget but this is too fine to resist, and serves as excellent lectio divina this Lenten season.

Once more I shout Deo Gratias for the Reverend Father John Dear SJ and his persistently courageous witness to the Gospel of Jesus Christ in its integrity.

So true! Ben's witness is the

So true!
Ben's witness is the "MOST REQUIRED BY OUR TIMES."
May God inspire more of us to join Ben's Army of Peace.
God speed your pen John Dear.
The pen is a mighty weapon of peace.
In Solidarity,
Concetta Smart

Ben Salmon needs a Wikipedia

Ben Salmon needs a Wikipedia entry.

Seems I've heard about the

Seems I've heard about the use of solitary confinement and force-feeding more recently. Let me see now, what was the context? I think it had some something to do with Guantánamo detainees....

@Ken Maher Ha! you're right!

@Ken Maher

Ha! you're right! I started ... now you improve:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ben_Salmon

AS a Catholic I have been

AS a Catholic I have been troubled by the idea of JUST WAR theory, for it is in this context that we can be led easily down a path to war. Is it needed or is it a desired action by some. We are easily lead to these ends most recently with the lies of the bush administration and the Iraq war.

If I am in touch with the teachings of Jesus, I meditate asking myself to envision Jesus walking around Afghanistan with a rifle, shooting and killing other human beings. Or perhaps he is in Kansas and spending his day guiding the unmanned drones over some poor village in the middle east. Then he comes home at night to spend time with his heavenly Father and perhaps pray, meditate and go for a walk before sleep, only to get up refreshed in the morning to continue carrying his rifle to kill more people and or perhaps hop into his truck and drive to an unmanned drone center in a US city.
"THOU SHALT NOT KILL" its a big one when it comes to this discussion of making war or not to make war.
I look at my hero's Ben Salmon,Mahatma Gandhi, Franz Jagerstatter, Dorothy Day, Dr. King or Thomas Merton, John Dear and so many others and I know that I am called to be a peace maker 100% and at the same time I know we will always have war and think we have many reasons to go to war but I am convinced that war is never the answer. Because HE said it..

RIGHT! What part of Thou

RIGHT! What part of Thou Shalt Not Kill! do we NOT understand?

What part of Love thy enemy and do good to those who harm thee?

If someone requires your coat give your shirt as well.

What part of the Sermon on the Mount?

Of Saint James?

thank you very much, PS

And where does the church

And where does the church stand today on war? What happened to The Challenge of peace:God's Promise and our Response?

The world's largest archdiocese is the military archdiocese.

I don't know if either "Christianity" or the Churches of Constantine (AKA the Roman Catholic Church, and Protestant traditions) still assume that Jesus' death was like a pagan form of sacrifice to pagan gods.

Peace!

The Challenge of Peace: God's

The Challenge of Peace: God's Promise and Our Response a Pastoral Letter on War and Peace remains available for a penny over at amazon.com and remains the most important USCCB document for all anglo American Roman Catholics, along with And Economic Justice For All.

All who read will discover the just war theory no longer applies, and in fact never has.

What a moving story, John.

What a moving story, John. Thank you.
I read this and then think of EWTN and torture.
I think of the Iraq war and the tentative voice of the USCCB.
We do not know how to navigate what it means to give to Cesar what is Cesar's and to God what is Gods.
We misuse philosophy to reach the conclusion we want.
The Gospels are simple and we just can't handle the teaching.
Ben Salmon is my new hero, the one I needed for Lent. Peace starts with me.
I am moved to tears.

I think I can understand Ben

I think I can understand Ben Salmon, but not support him. He was a zealot, in his case a "peace zealot" to be sure, but a zealot none the less. We exist because sometimes we have to fight - and we do it - with ample precedent both in the law and in religious beliefs. God ordered people to war in the Old Testament. Someone suggested Hitler might have been stopped in non-violent ways. I wonder if they're read anything about Hitler and his gang of cutthroats. The Jews met him non-violently for the most part and suffered the Holocaust for their peacefulness. I have known CO's who believed war was wrong but at least they served their country in some capacity. My Vietnam era friend worked in a hospital doing every dirty job they gave him. In WWI a lot of CO's drove ambulances in war zones.

I see nothing in Ben Salmon to hold up as an example of anything but misplaced zeal.

And I see nothing in your

And I see nothing in your writings to uphold the sacred appellation of Brother.

and I the worst of all remain
frère charles du désert OSB OBLAT (Congrégation de Subiaco)

Your comment references mine

Your comment references mine Brother Ed and I have read a great deal into Hitler and his gang. The Jews did not engage in passive resistance. They didn't really resist at all until the Warsaw Ghetto uprising. In the main they went along to get along, or just left the country. They used the historic strategies they had always used to survive in Europe. Hitler bet his regime on these strategies, knowing full well the West would take their cue from the Jewish response.

The CO's you write about are the CO's of my experience. They determined that patriotism was of a higher moral value, or at least a safer strategy, than their objections to war. In other words they partially went along, to get along.

For me, the most telling part

For me, the most telling part of this article is how the priests withheld the sacraments of reconciliation, communion, and anointing of the sick from Ben Salmon in prison. And then a priest who gave him holy communion was disciplined.

What does this tell us about the church and its relation to power? When the chips are down, will the church stand by people trying to be like Jesus or will they cozy up to the power mongers? Are the church's sights and values on spiritual or secular things?

Why doesn't the church have an established policy to support conscientious objectors? Do I want my little boy to be enlisted and forced to kill or be killed to swell the bank accounts of the people who somehow profit by a perpetual state of war? Would the church stand up for him if he saw through the big lie and refused to sacrifice himself? Why not? Why not?

Address kindly your crucial

Address kindly your crucial questions to Bishop Burke, among others

"And I see nothing in your

"And I see nothing in your writings to uphold the sacred appellation of Brother.
and I the worst of all remain"

Ah, Frere, is it just me you judge, or everyone who disagrees with you?

Friends, for a superb

Friends,

for a superb commentary by the best teacher of Gospel Nonviolence in the U.S. see the free download of Fr. Emmanuel Charles McCarthy's "The Christian Just War Theory: Logic of Deceit". I can be found on the site www.centerforchristiannonviolence.org --- click on "RESOURCES" and then scroll down and click on "BOOKS" It's a free downlaod.

For how can we imitate the Christ by choosing means that are contrary and incompatible to His?

Thank you, I was deeply moved

Thank you, I was deeply moved and inspired by your writing here John. I come from a military family: my grandmother and grandfather served in WWI in the Navy, ancestors fought in the American Revolution and the Civil War, my father served on the USS Intrepid in WWII Pacific fleet. It is time that Catholics and all Christians who say they believe in Jesus Christ and an Almighty God to say no to War like Ben Salmon and turn their weapons into ploughshares.

We need an Army of Peace to dismantle all of the nuclear weapons in the world, to find and locate and get rid of land mines that maim and kill years after wars, to be a force to help people who have been devastated by earthquakes and storms, to help the poor and suffering. God created us to live as creators, not destroyers.

I've created a piece of music entitled Ben Salmon's Army of Peace. I hope many will join!! Here's a link to the music. Hit the play button for it to play.

http://www.reverbnation.com/tunepak/2428050

There are several instances

There are several instances of nonviolence working against nazi tyranny. If a country was occupied that does not negate nonviolence. Nonviolence can be used to keep an occupation from being successful. If christians had been willing to stand up and speak out for their neighbors regardless of religion or race the nazis could have been denied the support they needed to stay in power. If one reads Mein Kamp you can read that even Hitler knew that no regime can stay in power without the support of the people.
World War I was clearly immoral and Ben Salmon is one of the true heroes. The soldiers who served are not heroes but victims.

Post new comment

NCR Comment code:

  1. Be respectful. Do not attack the writer. Take on the idea, not the messenger.
  2. Use appropriate language. Avoid vulgarities and slurs.
  3. Keep to the point. Deliberate digressions don't aid the discussion.

For more detailed guidelines, visit our User Guidelines page.

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
(if you have one; if not, leave this blank)
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <font> <swf> <swf list>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You may use <swf file="song.mp3"> to display Flash files inline

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This is to prove you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.