Want to help? Accompany the poor

Are you familiar with the word “accompaniment” in connection with idea of foreign aid and other assistance to the poor? If not, then a recent article in the Foreign Affairs is worth reading. It was written by Paul Farmer, chairman of Harvard Medical School's Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, and a founding director of Partners In Health, an international charity that provides health care to and undertakes research and advocacy on behalf of the sick and poor. The July 29th article is actually adapted from Farmer’s May 2011 commencement speech at Harvard University's John F. Kennedy School of Government.

Farmer argues in his article that all the good intentions of all the good aid agencies, governments and NGOs, will come up short unless they involve “accompaniment,” meaning the ability to project, plan and stay with a development effort while essentially walking with those whom it is aimed to aid.

From my experiences many years back, in Vietnam, when I worked as a volunteer with war refugees, Farmer is right on the mark. The problem with so many aid projects overseas is the inability to stay with them, to “accompany” the needy, to stay flexible when it is required. More often than not, aid projects are determined from outside the country, or at least from outside the experiences and lessons of those for whom the aid is intended to help. In some ways, foreign aid gets too big, bringing too much “expertise,” and ends up on the short side of successful implementation.

“Accompaniment” is an elastic term, Farmer explains. It has a basic meaning: “To accompany someone is to go somewhere with him or her, to break bread together, to be present on a journey with a beginning and an end. There's an element of mystery, of openness, of trust, in accompaniment. … The companion says: ‘I'll go with you and support you on your journey wherever it leads; I'll share your fate for a while. And by “a while,” I don't mean a little while.’”

Unpacking the word, “accompaniment,” Farmer points out it comes from the Latin: ad + cum + panis, which, he notes, is one way of saying “breaking bread together.” Some Catholics, of course, are familiar with the word as it shows up in liberation theology. Farmer notes that the organization he founded, Partners In Health, was inspired, in part, by the writings of Latin American theologians.

Subscribe to NCR

Want to read more about important issues in the life of the Church? A subscription to NCR will keep you up to date and informed.

Subscribe now!

“The great failures of policy and governance usually result from failures of implementation, and accompaniment is good insurance against such failures, writes Farmer. “In other words, as institutions are rationalized, and as platforms of accountability are strengthened, the potential for accompaniment can be threatened, since it is open-ended, elastic, and nimble.”

Applying the idea of accompaniment to Haiti in the wake of the earthquake, the lessons are striking, says Farmer. “We all waited to be saved by expertise, but we never were. True accompaniment does not privilege technical expertise above solidarity, compassion, and a willingness to tackle what may seem insuperable challenges. It requires cooperation, openness, and humility.”

Dr. Farmer who knows about

Dr. Farmer who knows about accompaniment! He walks among those he is aiding. They know his work but more importantly they know his heart and his faith in them and hope for them. He is a healer.

We as a Church, community and country need to pay attention to this message.

A Spanish hymn, "Caminando

A Spanish hymn, "Caminando Juntos," sings:
"No camino solo, porque voy con Dios,
y saludo a todos con un gran adios
"Adios" quiere decir: "Vaya usted con Dios!"
Mi corazón se alegra, con tigo voy, Señor.

acompañando con
Paz y Bien, Rolando, SFO.

The following may seem not

The following may seem not germane, but I believe that it is, and profoundly so. This article is a good reminder. The Peace Corps and its domestic counterpart, VISTA, were also built on this philosophy (although the relatively short terms of service limited the amount of accompaniment); and so is mission work at its best. The Church, too, is meant to accompany us on our journey, but often becomes a "rationalized institution". I have been arguing for some time that the Church needs to become more of a rationalized institution, particularly "as platforms of accountability are [hopefully] strengthened". I still think that we need those things -- new structures and procedures, transparency, more local control, effective checks and balances, and accountability.
That said, we must guard against becoming too much of a bureaucracy, or too politicized. The structures and procedures are meant to help, not hinder. The Church (that is, all of us, whether or not we have any formal role in the organizational hierarchy) above all, must keep its eye on its mission, to be an instrument of love and compassion in this world, and to accompany us on our journey. We need to stay (or become) flexible and nimble in order to better show our love to this world.

Post new comment

NCR Comment code:

  1. Be respectful. Do not attack the writer. Take on the idea, not the messenger.
  2. Use appropriate language. Avoid vulgarities and slurs.
  3. Keep to the point. Deliberate digressions don't aid the discussion.

For more detailed guidelines, visit our User Guidelines page.

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
(if you have one; if not, leave this blank)
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <font> <swf> <swf list>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You may use <swf file="song.mp3"> to display Flash files inline

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This is to prove you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.