NCR on Kindle - NCR classifieds - YouTube - Twitter - Facebook - Email Alerts - RSS
Stupak Still in Negotiations
According to a report at Politico.com, negotiations between the House leadership and Congressman Bart Stupak are still on-going. While it looks increasingly like the Speaker will whip up the necessary votes for the measure, the report says that they want the dozen or so members committed to the Stupak approach to abortion restrictions on board.
I have never doubted that if push comes to shove, Speaker Pelosi would throw her pro-choice allies under the bus if that was what was needed to pass the bill. She did as much in November. But, this raises an interesting specter for pro-health care forces. Will they be willing to jettison their commitment to abortion rights in order to pass the health care bill?
I have argued that the Senate’s abortion language is sufficiently restrictive to warrant support for the bill. Indeed, there does not appear to be much of a difference between the two bills on this score. But, the argument works both ways. Just as I have criticized Stupak for risking the overall health care bill for minor differences on abortion, I would criticize pro-choice Democrats who would refuse to pass a bill that includes the Stupak language. Additionally, it is doubtful the Republicans would sign on to support the Stupak Amendment if doing so meant final passage of the bill. They did so in November. It is far from clear they would do so again. Finally, it will be interesting to see how the USCCB reacts if Stupak gets a conditional agreement, for example, that his concerns will be addressed in a subsequent vote. If the pro-life hero Stupak signs off, will the bishops?
So, stay tuned. This just may get curiouser and curiouser.





NYT on Saturday; 'But she
NYT on Saturday;
'But she [Pelosi] and the Obama administration are considering the idea of an executive order that would make clear that the legislation is not intended to change existing federal law or policy, which bans the use of taxpayer money for abortions'.
Not enough for A/B Chaput and Card. George;?
If not why should Laity believe them about abuse reform? we can't vote them out...
I just came across this in
I just came across this in the Vox Nova blogsite:
“Israel has universal health care, and Israel is able to do such in part because of all our funding. So why has none of the same voices raised concern about American money being used for the sake of abortion policies in Israel?” (http://vox-nova.com/2010/03/20/the-anchoress-doesnt-know-prayer/)
If I were a pro-abortion
If I were a pro-abortion Democrat (a somewhat redundant proposition, like a round circle) I would not be checking the bus schedule to see what Greyhound Nancy will be "shoving me under." If Winters thinks that Pelosi will pass Obamacare with pro-life provisions -- as opposed to the clear trajectory of Obama, Reid, and Pelosi to pull each and every trick, procedural and otherwise, constitutional and otherwise -- to get a pro-abortion bill (the Senate bill) enacted, then we finally know who in Washington smoked but didn't inhale.
Post new comment