NCR on Kindle - NCR classifieds - YouTube - Twitter - Facebook - Email Alerts - RSS
Pope launches council to fight secular 'Eclipse of God'
By JOHN L. ALLEN JR.
Rome
One classic way for bureaucracies to express their priorities is by which topics merit their own departments. By that logic, Pope Benedict XVI sent a clear signal tonight that the Vatican cares about the threat posed by secularization, announcing the creation of a brand new Pontifical Council devoted to the re-evangelization of the Christian West.
Benedict did not give a formal name for the new office, but reports indicate it will be called "Pontifical Council for the New Evangelization." Its job, according to the pope, will be to resist an "eclipse of the sense of God" in secular cultures.
Though Benedict did not reveal his choice to lead the enterprise, it’s widely expected that the new Vatican department, known as a “dicastery,” will be entrusted to Italian Archbishop Rino Fisichella, currently President of the Pontifical Academy for Life and a former chaplain to the Italian parliament.
If so, the move would amount to a papal vote of confidence for the embattled Fisichella, who has come under fire in his current post by pro-life groups for allegedly taking too soft a line on the question of excommunication for those involved in abortions.
When Ratzinger was elected to the papacy five years ago, many cardinals at the time said they had turned to him because they regarded him as the figure best equipped to respond to the crisis of secularization in the West, especially in Europe. His choice of name, “Benedict,” was in part a reference to St. Benedict, the founder of European monasticism.
In the intervening five years, a series of controversies and scandals during Benedict’s pontificate – most recently, the global sexual abuse crisis swirling around the Catholic church – has often obscured that aim, and arguably made it far more difficult to realize, at least in the short term. Nevertheless, the creation of a new council suggests that Benedict has not thrown in the towel.
During his homily this evening for a vespers service to open the annual feast of Sts. Peter and Paul, Benedict said he decided to create the new department to promote renewed evangelization of traditionally Christian nations “living through a progressive secularization of society and a sort of ‘eclipse of the sense of God.’”
That eclipse, Benedict said, ‘constitutes a challenge to find adequate means to re-propose the perennial truths of the Gospel of Christ.”
Aside from the overt logic of the new department, the creation of the new Council and Fisichella’s appointment to head it are striking for two other reasons.
First, the decision to create the new Pontifical Council is another indication of Benedict XVI’s fondness for the Communion and Liberation movement. The idea for a “Council for the New Evangelization” was first floated by Fr. Luigi Giussani, founder of the Communion and Liberation movement, in the early 1980s, but was not taken up by Pope John Paul II. More recently, Cardinal Angelo Scola of Venice, himself close to the Communion and Liberation movement, represented the idea to Benedict XVI.
Benedict’s affinity for the movement is well known. Then-Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger delivered the homily at Giussani’s funeral Mass in 2005, and a group of consecrated women who are part of the Memores Domini group within Communion and Liberation run Benedict’s papal household.
Second, if Fisichella indeed becomes the first president of the new council, it would be a show of papal support for compassion in pressing the church’s pro-life argument.
A philosopher by training, Fisichella and Ratzinger were primary advisors to John Paul II for his 1998 encyclical Fides et Ratio. In 2008, Benedict named Fisichella as President of the Pontifical Academy for Life, the Vatican’s primary pro-life body of scholars and activists. His role in Italian politics, his media savvy, and his background in philosophy rather than theology have all given Fisichella a profile as someone who knows how to talk to the secular world, making him a logical candidate to head a council dedicated to re-evangelizing the West.
Fisichella is also an ambivalent figure, however, for some of the church’s most staunchly pro-life forces, as a result of his role in a 2009 controversy from Brazil involving an abortion for a nine-year-old girl. The girl had become pregnant after reportedly being raped by her stepfather, and her mother arranged for an abortion. Archbishop Jose Cardoso Sobrinho of Olinda and Recife, upon learning of the case, announced that the mother, the doctor, and others involved in the abortion were excommunicated.
Sobrinho’s position aroused widespread protest in Brazil and around the world, but drew swift backing from Cardinal Giovanni Battista Re, prefect of the Vatican’s Congregation for Bishops. Fisichella, however, then penned a front-page essay in L’Osservatore Romano that appeared to criticize Sobrinho.
“Before giving thought to excommunication, it was necessary and urgent to safeguard the innocent life of this girl, and return her to a level of humanity of which we, men of the church, should be expert heralds and teachers,” Fisichella wrote.
What is needed now, he added, “is the sign of a testimony of closeness with the one suffering, an act of mercy that, even while firmly maintaining the principle, is able to look beyond the juridical sphere.”
That article brought protests both from bishops in Brazil and from pro-life activists all over the world, resulting in a July 10 “clarification” from the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith indicating that church teaching on abortion has not changed and will not change.
Within the Pontifical Academy for Life, a group of members led by Belgian Monsignor Michel Schooyans wrote a lengthy letter calling for Fisichella’s removal, arguing that he had falsely invoked the concept of “compassion” to justify actions contrary to Christian morality.
Nonetheless, Fisichella has remained on the job … and now appears headed for a new one, obviously close to the pope’s heart.
Related Stories
Seven days that shook the Vatican, Allen's Friday All Things Catholic column
Friday Vatican potpourri, a "reporter’s notebook" round-up of footnotes and nuggets from a dramatic week
Triumph of theologians over diplomats in Vatican
Three archbishops and the American Catholic future
Interview with Archbishop Jerome Listecki
Interview with Archbishop Dennis Schnurr





It is a good thing that the
It is a good thing that the Pope is appointing Archbishop Fisichella to lead the new Commission to evangelize the 'secular' West. He at least had compassion for the little Brazilian girl.
It is my contention, however, that the primary reason for the decline of the influence of the Catholic Church is its attitude toward women. After all, it is primarily the mothers who teach the faith, with the support of the fathers. In our Western culture where women have achieved the status of heads of state, as in Germany, and Secretary of State, as in America, for the church to consider women as expendable certainly does not inspire a great deal of confidence in women in the teachings of the church.
The most egregious current example is the Phoenix, AZ, Bishop who was perfectly willing to sacrifice what could probably be the many years remaining of a woman's life for a few more months of life for the fetus she was carrying, does not inspire women to teach their children that the church has any answers to anything.
If it can be called 'radical feminism' that women are finally realizing their own value and worth and refuse to be considered expendable by some in the hierarchy, then so be it.
The Pope can estasblish all of the Commissions he wants, but until he appoints a well-qualified woman to the leadership position, it will be a long uphil battle to re-evangelize Western culture, if at all.
You are quite confused about
You are quite confused about what the Church teaches about women.
First of all they are not believed to be expendable commodities as you claim.
"The most egregious current example is the Phoenix, AZ, Bishop who was perfectly willing to sacrifice what could probably be the many years remaining of a woman's life for a few more months of life for the fetus she was carrying, does not inspire women to teach their children that the church has any answers to anything. "
Christian life is sacrifice as well. One must make a choice, a new life or your own.... any decent mother, as far as I know, would give her life for his child!!!
"If it can be called 'radical feminism' that women are finally realizing their own value and worth and refuse to be considered expendable by some in the hierarchy, then so be it. "
Your attitude is 'Radical Femminism', yes... women realizing their valuem however, is not.
Women have great value in the Catholic Church, but many people apparently prefer to criticize from ignorance and misunderstandings.
"The Pope can estasblish all of the Commissions he wants, but until he appoints a well-qualified woman to the leadership position, it will be a long uphil battle to re-evangelize Western culture, if at all."
There are many women in positions of powern in the Church. The Church is not only 'priests 'n' bishops'. The lay people cover an important role as well!
Hence, you are actually OFFENDING many Catholic women and denigrating their value!
I fear you miss-take some
I fear you miss-take some facts ... The question was not whether the mother should be willing to sacrifice her own life for the sake of the birth of her child. The threat to her life was imminent. Thus the question was whether an abortion should be permitted to kill the child so as to avoid killing both mother and child. Should one die, or should both die?
One may never do anything
One may never do anything evil so that good may result. Aborting the child is murder, even if it is to save the life of another. It cannot be done.
In that instance, the Church teaches, according to the Catholic Encyclopedia that "If medical treatment or surgical operation, necessary to save a mother's life, is applied to her organism (though the child's death would, or at least might, follow as a regretted but unavoidable consequence), it should not be maintained that the fetal life is thereby directly attacked. Moralists agree that we are not always prohibited from doing what is lawful in itself, though evil consequences may follow which we do not desire. The good effects of our acts are then directly intended, and the regretted evil consequences are reluctantly permitted to follow because we cannot avoid them. The evil thus permitted is said to be indirectly intended."
Simply put, surgical operation to save the mother's life, even at the expense of the child's can be done, if all that is possible is done to try and save the child's life. This is not an abortion, because it is not a direct attack on the living fetus. A direct attack on the living fetus merits an excommunication.
In relation to the first comment about needing a female in power for people to begin listening to the Church, if what you say is true, than the world has hit a new low. The fact that the Truth of the Church is no longer listened to by the public unless it is said by a women is very sad. It should be listened to irrespective of who says it - the Truth is the Truth after all.
In relation to the article, this is good news. Battling secularism is an important part of the Church's duties. We, as Catholics, should pray that this works - God knows the world needs to change. Peace.
Exactly. Should one die, or
Exactly. Should one die, or should both die. Should the mother's life ultimately be sacrificed for a few more months of life for the fetus. Or should the fetus' life be shortened by a few months to prevent the death of the mother.
On a purely tangential,
On a purely tangential, quirky, humorous, light-hearted note, "Eclipse of God" sounds like the translated title of music track from a Japanese role-playing game.
Some examples of titles from those games in a similar vein: "Birth of a God," "One-Winged Angel" (Final Fantasy VII); "Wanderer of Time" (Final Fantasy VI); "Angel's Fear," "Faith Total Machine," "Return to Forever" (Seiken Densetsu 3); "Eternal Recurrence," "A Prayer and a Whisper" (Secret of Mana); "Scars of Time" (Chrono Cross); "The Beginning and the End" (Xenogears), etc. "Eclipse of God" would be a good final-battle song. :)
here is my tangent to the
here is my tangent to the tangent :
considering the source, a likely precedent for the phrase is Goetterdaemmerung, Twilight of the Gods.
his was done 50 years ago. It
his was done 50 years ago. It was called Vatican II.
A woman's rise in secular
A woman's rise in secular power is one thing and not to be confused with her moral fiber. Indeed, it is correct to state today as ever that the hand that rocks the cradle rules the world. I contend that Holy Mother Church is the singular place where a woman can go to understand her worth and dignity, and by doing so, she can pass this worth and dignity on via morality and in other ways to her children.
My career as a military officer, physician and mother has only been greatly enhanced by my humble practice of the virtues, particularly the Theological virtues of Faith, Hope and Charity.
I am specifically raising my children to be well-equipped enlightened rationalists, the flower of Creation to be sure.
As for the vehicle of Grace, prayer is supreme. Prayers for our loved ones, our nation, our world, our neighbors, our enemies and the list goes on. Here, we understand Jesus' words to his disciples, and I paraphrase: Be wise as serpents and gentle as doves. Watch and pray - always. God bless.
All the Vatican Commission
All the Vatican Commission has to do to fight the Eclipse of God is look in the mirror and say, "put up your dukes"!
"As for the vehicle of Grace,
"As for the vehicle of Grace, prayer is supreme. Prayers for our loved ones, our nation, our world, our neighbors, our enemies and the list goes on. Here, we understand Jesus' words to his disciples, and I paraphrase: Be wise as serpents and gentle as doves. Watch and pray - always. God bless."
I totally agree. I belong to a Catholic Community of Women where one of the requirements is not just to pray but also have a regular time for prayer and defend this time that we have set. The effect is a much deeper communication with God and equally deeper faith in Him.
The erosion of church-going
The erosion of church-going membership in Europe is extreme, and that in the United States is troubling. Were we not the [at least initial] church choice of immigrants populations, the RCC in the USA would also be declining in membership. In my own case my belief in Church understanding of Scripture and faith outweighs any disgust at how things have been mismanaged.
One problem the Church has is in being thought relevant by 'modern' people in Western society. There's a real attitude of 'why bother going to church -- a subset of 'what's in it for me' as the major factor of choice in America and elsewhere.
The Church's devotion to liturgy and to the 'who' of Christ, and its relative failure to speak to the evils of society other than the Lightning Rods: abortion, gay marriage, stem cell research and the like, is leaving many simply bored with the irrelevant.
For a huge majority of Americans, seems to me, the doings that are the Lightning Rods do not reflect anything done to 'me' or that "I" want to do; whereas jobs, health, living conditions,and just treatment by society are the core of done to 'me' or that "I" want to do. Christ taught a great deal our relations with each other and with the 'others,' which while talked about some is never given the priority given Christology and given the Lightning Rods. Until the Church dialogues with the people, not refusing to talk to them unless they first come to Church, but talking to them where they are found and about their concerns, erosion will be steady.
I sometimes think Christ would weep if He walked into the 'average' RC Church some Sunday, unless lucky enough to walk into one of the Churches whose Pastor, Pastoral Council, and membership really 'get it.' In this regard we may have some things to learn from our Latino newcomers about how to do relevant Church.
Christ would weep if He
Christ would weep if He walked into a mass thats focused on Him? You mean the way it should be? That's a foolish thing to say.
Devotion to Christ comes first; other things, second. Besides, the Church has already spoken on the issues of homosexuality, abortion etc. If people refuse to listen, then it's on their heads. We should keep trying, sure, but at the end of the day its up to them.
Somehow the expressions
Somehow the expressions "rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic" comes to mind.
This move is waaaaaaaayyyyyy overdue. The Church lost Europe many, many years ago. First came the working people. Then the intellectuals. Now it is a curiosity with nice tourist-attracting buildings of museum stature.
Once the US pew potatoes wake up to the sad state of how THEY are treated by the hierarchy, the doors will all be opening outwardly, with little if any influx. Each year the USCCB crows about the number of people received into the church at Easter. No one (if this is even known) has much to say about the numbers who simply get up, dust themselves off, and walk away. I suspect their numbers are legion compared to the relatively few who join the church. I'd also like to see stats on the retention rate of these folks after, say, 5 years.
If Benedict wants to
If Benedict wants to re-evangelize the West, he can start by rehabilitating the dozens of talented theologians he's silenced over the years and let them do what needs to be done: articulate the Christian message in a way that speaks to an educated segment of the laity tired of the theological pablum the magisterium tries to pass off as the Christian faith.
This would be a very good
This would be a very good start!
I also think that the empty pews do not signify an "eclipse of God". People are just going where they will be spiritually nourished. Unfortunately, for many of us, that no longer happens in the present RC structure.
The West will certainly not
The West will certainly not be re-evangelized by allowing those theologians who "woo" heterodoxy to further spread their errors - that's why we are in the mess we are in now! Moreover, there are many orthodox theologians whose writings are "intellectually" satisfying.
What good will this do? The
What good will this do? The RCC is dying and I dont think anything can be done to save it. The majority of its flock are mostly now in Africa where they have let them triple in numbers by demonizing population control but could not careless for the quality of the those lives.
I say let it die along with all the pedophiles it protected.
It's not so much that
It's not so much that secularism has within itself the power of significant impact in the modern world; it's that the response of Catholicism is so weak.
This is so,in my view, because most of our bishops and most of our priests, especially the seculars, do not know how to point out the errors of secularism. They are trained to enter into their culture of entitlement and rule over the laity. Dinesh D'Souza had to come from Jesuit training in India to give
American Catholics an intellectual voice. Sad.
Post new comment