Peace and Patience

Printer-friendly versionPrinter-friendly versionSend to friendSend to friendPDF versionPDF version

All the wringing of hands that surrounds President Obama’s Nobel Peace Prize reminds me of a very early morning breakfast I had thirty years ago with another Nobel Peace Prize recipient.

It was January of 1979, and I woke up at five o’clock on a dark bleak Moscow morning to hail a cab outside the enormous, Stalinesque Hotel Russiya. I was a senior in college at Columbia University then, and I climbed into the taxi with my friend Mitchell. We both ran the university daily newspaper and through a series of phone calls from supposedly secure lines, we had arranged an interview with Andrei Sakharov on behalf of Ivy League student newspapers.

He had won the Nobel Peace Prize in 1975 for his work on behalf of human rights in the Soviet Union. Sakharov spent his earlier years as a nuclear physicist, part of a team of scientists that developed the Soviet hydrogen bomb. That work lead him into a life of relative privilege in the USSR – but as time worn on, he could not look past the corruption and abuse that plagued his country’s political system.

Our car stopped outside a once-grand turn-of-the-century apartment building on Moscow’s Garden Street, one of the better parts of town despite its drab appearance back then. We climbed up four flights of stairs, past the sharp stares of two men fixing an elevator that did not seem broken. Their eyes followed us as we walked on.

We rang a bell, and explained who we were in very broken Russian to an old woman at the door. She looked at our Western-student attire and shook her head vigorously: “You want Sakharov,” she blurted out. “He’s one floor below.” She slammed the door in our faces.

Another door creaked open one floor down, and another old woman waved us in. She was Sakharov’s mother-in-law. (His wife was in the West for eye surgery, granted only after one of Sakharov’s frequent hunger strikes.)

Although our contacts swore all was arranged, no one in the apartment knew we were coming. Still, the Nobel Peace Prize winner, hair askew from sleep, a threadbare robbed wrapped around his pajamas, emerged from his bedroom to greet us.

As his mother-in-law made tea in a samovar and sliced up black bread, Sakharov spoke to us in fluent English. His manner was generous and relaxed, as he talked about his life and how he got to this place in it. Honestly, I remember now only a little of what he said that morning (and I can’t find my old copy of the interview we printed). But I remember vividly the kind of man he was: he seemed very, very patient.

If there is anything that binds Peace Prize laureates, it seems to be patience. They know that making war is fast, but the work of peace is slow. No one goes into the peace business because they need instant gratification.

Sakharov asked us a lot of questions about the U.S., Massachusetts in particular. His step-daughter had been allowed to emigrate there, and was living outside Boston with her husband and children. He showed us family photos, and said he hoped to visit them soon. Still, he seemed patient.

Within a year of our visit, the Soviets would drive Sakharov out of Moscow. He would spend years in internal exile in Gorky, away from friends, family, and things like modern medical care. But he continued to speak out, continued to work – and in 1986, Mikhail Gorbachev let him move back to Moscow. In 1989, Sakharov became a member of a democratic Soviet parliament.
He died later that year, but had lived to see his patience rewarded.

I think about this because of all the wagging tongues who say Obama got his Nobel too soon - - that he’d not done enough yet to earn the recognition. That much may be true, but to me Obama – on issues of conflict and peace -- exhibits that same sense patience. The same understanding that none of this is easy, and none of it gets done by people in a hurry. (They call it a “rush to war,” but I’ve never heard of a “rush to peace.”)

Maybe that’s what the Nobel committee saw, too – and raced forward to acknowledge that.

What I see is that the Nobel

What I see is that the Nobel Committee did not look at President Obamas eleven days in office that so many seem to think is the big deal. What they looked at is the man who worked for Social Justice as a young lawyer, who ran for state office and then national office but all the time working with that patient attitude as you say and finally reaching the White House while easing fears around the world. This award is not for what he has done as President of the U.S. but rather about who President Obama is and what his hopes have consistently strived for. He is a good man and many recognize it even if the far political right does not. He is a man who believes in people and peace. What more could we want in a President or Nobel Peace prize winner?

What countries did Mother Theresa change? What were her great monuments? They were that she did what no one else wanted. She took care of the dying people in the streets and reminded us we are their brothers and sisters. Well President Obama too, reminds us we are all in this world together and we are our brother's keeper. He and she have something in common besides patience. Maybe others do too. It reminds me of President Carter building homes for his brother who does not have one. Maybe there are a lot of similarities between Obama and other winners.

Remember this if little

Remember this if little else:
"If there is anything that binds Peace Prize laureates, it seems to be patience. They know that making war is fast, but the work of peace is slow. No one goes into the peace business because they need instant gratification."

and:
"I think about this because of all the wagging tongues who say Obama got his Nobel too soon - - that he’d not done enough yet to earn the recognition. That much may be true, but to me Obama – on issues of conflict and peace -- exhibits that same sense patience. The same understanding that none of this is easy, and none of it gets done by people in a hurry. (They call it a “rush to war,” but I’ve never heard of a “rush to peace.”)"

Let us walk together to peace, or die apart as fools.
(What Nobel Laureate said something similar to that?)

I regret that I also cannot find any trace of the report of Mr. Ferullo's interview . . .

Good article. And we do know

Good article. And we do know that President Obama is a real worker for the projects he takes on.

I don't hear much criticism these days about President Wilson's Nobel Peace Prize. This is so, even though the "Peace of 1919" led directly to the Nazism and Fascism that consciously worked to cause World War II. This is so because Wilson tried hard, first to keep America out of the War (World War I), and when America's involvement was finally necessary (April, 1917), he soon pushed for his Fourteen Points, and physically suffered as a result of his largely unsuccessful efforts abroad and in Washington for a peace that Europe might live with.

The Nobel Peace Prize apparently is not about the recipient's success at achieving particular peace, but it is about the peace that the world seeks and the hope that the recipient offers for that peace.

I hope some Columbia students dig and find that printed copy of your interview for you, Mr. Ferullo.

Vincent

October 12, 2009

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <font> <swf> <swf list>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You may use <swf file="song.mp3"> to display Flash files inline

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This is prove you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions. Solve the simple math problem.
5 + 10 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.