NCR on Kindle - NCR classifieds - YouTube - Twitter - Facebook - Email Alerts - RSS
Letter to Pax Christi members following bishop's resignation
In a statement this morning, the leadership of Pax Christi USA reacts to the news yesterday that their bishop-president, Los Angeles Auxiliary Bishop Gabino Zavala, has resigned from ministry after acknowledging he is the father of two teenage children:
It is with great sadness that we write to you today about the resignation of Bishop Gabino Zavala. Pax Christi USA learned of Bishop Zavala's resignation yesterday. In a letter addressed to Catholics in the Archdiocese of Los Angeles (where Bishop Zavala was an auxiliary bishop), Archbishop Jose Gomez stated that Bishop Zavala's letter of resignation was accepted by the Vatican after he had disclosed that he is "the father of two minor teenage children who live with their mother in another state."
Bishop Zavala has served as bishop-president of Pax Christi USA for the past 9 years and had been a bishop member for many years prior to his time in leadership. We are grateful for his past leadership and for his long-time witness to peace and justice as a member of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops. Bishop Zavala consistently brought the power of the gospel to bear on issues like immigration, worker rights, the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, and nuclear disarmament.
This past year saw the completion of Bishop Zavala's third term as bishop-president of Pax Christi USA. The search for his replacement was already underway and will continue. We hope to announce the selection of a new bishop-president in the coming weeks.
During this time of personal hardship, we offer our prayers for Bishop Zavala, his family, and all those affected by this news. We pray that the privacy of all those impacted will be respected and that all will experience God's mercy and compassion during this difficult time.
In peace,
Sr. Josie Chrosniak, HM
National Council Chair, Pax Christi USA
Sr. Patty Chappell, SNDdeN
Executive Director, Pax Christi USA





What difference does it make?
What difference does it make? He is a bishop. There are plenty of married Catholic priests. Leave him be and celebrate his heterosexuality.
Is it just me, or is there
Is it just me, or is there anyone else here who is troubled by the idea that there are two teenagers whose father has been denying his paternity for their whole lives until now? Which is worse? Pax Christi needs a new leader or Pax Christi has been run by a deadbeat dad? I'm glad they're at least respecting the teenagers' privacy if not their dignity.
No, it's not just you. We
No, it's not just you. We are merely reacting to what has been exposed. I wonder just how wide spread this behavior is that hasn't been exposed yet! It seems every week there is another top church official committing some crime against morality!
Yes, Celibrate His
Yes, Celibrate His Heterosexuality! On one hand, it's such a relief to see a bishop resign because he admits to having had a heterosexual relationship. On the other hand, there are probably many bishops, who have also acted on their heterosexual tendencies, who aren't as truthful. For the Church it seems that breaking the Vow of Celibacy is only a sin if it is in a heterosexual relationship. Go figure, but then if you do, why don't you also scratch your head and wonder why homosexual relationships in the priesthood are ignored and easily forgiven, and sexual relationships only appear to be a SIN if they are in relationship with a woman!
Does anyone believe that
Does anyone believe that Zavala is the only U.S. Bishop with a mistress? Maybe even with illegitimate kids? At least he doesn't seem to have raped any of our children! To bad the church cherry-picks St. Paul's epistles. Didn't he say a bishop could be married? Of course, he also said that, in God's eyes, in the new dispensation, there is neither male nor female. Someone should tell the good old boys who write the rules for ordination to reread that epistle.
Dear Sara TX2: The same
Dear Sara TX2:
The same thought about the two fatherless (so far) teenagers troubles me too. What effect will the sudden appearance of an unknown father have on them, their relationshops with their mother abd with their friends?
However there is also another lesson that their father may have learned and that Church authorities generally need to learn and apply to their own actions: You cannot solve problems by covering them up, you only make them worse.
Hmm so if it was Maciel or a
Hmm so if it was Maciel or a conservative it is evil but if it a darling of the Mahoney/Pax Christi crew it is natural?
Given how few priests and
Given how few priests and bishops apparently are actually able to live according to their vows of celibacy over the course of their lifetimes (see Richard Sipes' research, for starters), why it should be shocking that some of their liaisons result in children is beyond me. What's actually more shocking to me is how few apparently do; it does make one wonder if priests aren't just particularly good at making sure their women use contraceptives or if there aren't some abortions going on.
I do also wonder if one reason it seems the hierarchy has turned a blind eye to so much of the homosexual behavior in its ranks isn't because at least with homosexual relationships, there aren't any incovenient pregnancies to muck up the reputation of the Church. A quickie confession, and you are good to go. A baby, on the other hand, seems a permanent black eye for the priest or bishop who fathered him or her.
As for the difference between Zavala and Maciel---Maciel was a child sodomizer, raving drug addict, and fraud of the worst kind, and he founded a cult that was brainwashed to view him as a saint and has left thousands of people used and abused by both the Legion and Regnum Christi. The entire outfit was created as a system of deception and abuse. Trust me, as the spouse of somebody who worked for the Legionaries for nearly 15 years, I can assure you that Maciel's fathering of children (as terribly selfish of him as that was) was probably the least of his sins.
To compare Zavala to Maciel is grossly unfair.
The hierachy appears to feel
The hierachy appears to feel that heterosex is the worse sin compared to the molestation of males. Maciel was allowed to molest boys as long as he continued to pay the Vatican, but when it came out that he had fathered children, he was brought to ground.
In the Sacramento diocese we have a case of a priest who molested a girl and he was reported to the police at once. Not to sugar-coat damage done to the victim, but his behavior was essentially that of a child playing "doctor". As others have pointed out, the possibility of children causes more problems for the Church than homosexuality.
Maybe there's something deeper here--that the hierarchy has a fundamental fear and hatred of women, just as in the Middle Ages.
Ray Mac
Post new comment