The Independent News Source
Twitter - Facebook - Email Alerts - RSS
KC Nuke Plant: Lawsuit Dismissed, Opposition Continues
by Joshua McElwee on Oct. 22, 2009
Printer-friendly version
Send to friend
PDF version
Printer-friendly versionSend to friendPDF versionThe Kansas City Star reported Tuesday that a key effort by local community members to stop the construction of the new Kansas City Plant has been stalled.
On Monday a lawsuit filed by the National Resources Defense Council, Physicians for Social Responsibility, and others to stop the construction of the new plant was dismissed in Washington, D.C. The lawsuit had claimed that there was little public notice of the new plans and that the environmental assessment used to determine the impact of the new plant was overly broad.
Members of the local community are “upset that they didn’t give public notice, didn’t have a public hearing, and are not addressing existing contamination,” said Henry Stoever, a signer of the lawsuit who is a local attorney and board member of PeaceWorks Kansas City.
As reported on this site last week, the Kansas City Plant is a major nuclear weapons manufacturing center located about 13 miles south of downtown Kansas City, Mo. The plant is planned to be relocated to a newly developed facility.
Stoever, who drives within a mile of the proposed site to visit clients, has been active in opposing the new plant for over two years. He first became aware of the new plans from a notice in the Federal Register, the thousand-page daily journal of the U.S. federal government. The lack of public notice of the new plans was used as an argument in the lawsuit.
“I feel deep down that these are critical moral issues - as peace advocating people we want these issues out in public,” said Stoever. “Too often people want to sneak it by without public input.”
Land area of proposed KC Plant site from the environmental assessment
The lawsuit had also claimed that the new plant would have a considerable environmental impact. The environmental assessment being used to justify the construction of the new plant “is just so broad it could have pertained to anything in a 100 mile radius,” said Stoever. “It did not address that there are oil wells 7/10 of a mile from the site.”
Although Stoever said he did not know if they would appeal the ruling, the local community is continuing its opposition. An e-mail to supporters last night asked for letters to be written to The Kansas City Star, the mayor, the city council, and the Planned Industrial Expansion Authority.
“All we need to do is get folks to make wind tunnels and solar energy panels instead of nukes,” read the e-mail. “It's that simple.”
To see the report from the Kansas City Star on the dismissal of the lawsuit click here.
'All we need to do is get
'All we need to do is get folks to make wind tunnels and solar energy panels instead of nukes,' read the e-mail. 'It's that simple.'"
And with that, you can tell this person has no idea what he is talking about.
It is said that the plant is
It is said that the plant is planned to be relocated to a newly developed facility. Uh oh – this doesn't look good for Microsoft. Microsoft and T Mobile were named defendants in a class action lawsuit, as T Mobile and Microsoft had been hosting information from T Mobile smart phone customers, specifically Sidekick owners, on a server that went down on Friday, October 2nd, leading to users losing all of their information. This includes calendars, contacts, the whole shebang, and T Mobile customers were not amused. So, they sued – especially by one Maureen Thompson, from Atlanta, who among the plaintiffs was nonplussed, to say the least, about the server failure. Microsoft won't need any guaranteed payday loans for court costs, but it still is a blow to their reputation.
Post new comment