NCR on Kindle - NCR classifieds - YouTube - Twitter - Facebook - Email Alerts - RSS
Inequality is a moral dilemma for Catholics
The Census Bureau reported that the rate of poverty in the United States has significantly increased in the last several years.
Last year 2.6 million people fell into poverty. Some 46.2 million people now live in poverty, the highest number since the bureau began reporting poverty levels 52 years ago.
At the same time, median household income fell by 6.4 percent since 2007.
I don't want to dwell on all these statistics; readers can easily research them. What I want to do is to reflect on what this means morally and ethically especially for American Catholics.
While the Bible tells us that the poor will always be with us, this doesn't mean that we should stand by and do nothing. Let's remember that Jesus was a poor man and that he ministered especially to the poor and oppressed.
The foundations of the Catholic church are found in the Jesus story and that is the story of a church that prioritizes the needs of the poor -- and not just from a spiritual level but also from a material one.
Today American Catholics as well as Americans in general face a profound challenge and that is to confront the growing inequality of wealth and power in this country.
This inequality where the top 1 percent of Americans possesses some 20 percent of the country's income is unacceptable from a moral and ethical perspective.
The debate in Washington over whether the needs of the poor and the beleaguered middle class should come before the needs of the very wealthy is not just a political or economic issue, but a moral one. To his credit, President Obama has now come out calling for a fairer distribution of wealth that includes tax measures whereby the very wealthy pay their fair share of taxes.
This is not only rational but also just.
Yet his Republican opponents say no and argue that it's not fair to tax those who create jobs, meaning the very wealthy and the huge corporate interests.
Yet this is not true.
In the 1950s, for example, the marginal tax rate for the very wealthy was about 90 percent and yet much economic progress characterized that decade and into the 1960s. Tax rates were then cut, and under President George W. Bush the tax rate for the very wealthy was then under 30 percent.
However, this lower tax rate, rather than fueling economic growth, brought us the Great Recession. It is simply not historically true that higher tax rates especially for the wealthy brings economic decline. If this were the case, why isn't the current low tax rate for the wealthy bringing us economic prosperity now?
American Catholics need to support policies that are meant to bring about a more fair and just society. They need to do so not only for political and economic reasons, but because our faith calls for it.
It is difficult to believe Jesus would support an unfair tax system that prioritized the wealthy at the expense of the poor and those who are seeing their incomes decline every year.
The larger issues that we are confronting today are not just the specifics of the deficit, taxes, jobs, etc. The larger issues are the moral and ethical ones of whether we want a society that is fair and just to all including the distribution of wealth or a society with a small corporate elite hoarding much of the country's wealth and income.
But that question needs to be answered not politically, but morally.






Simplistic economics and even
Simplistic economics and even more simplistic theology.
For your consideration: The
For your consideration:
The incomes of the poor, working and middle classes have been falling for years while the rich increase their wealth and decrease their tax rates.
Holding political office used to be a finacial sacrifice for the sake of public servive. As a review of Congress now reveals, public office is now a means for becoming rich. So the millionaire Senators and Representatives, not surprisingly, support the private sector millionaires by passing laws that benefit both.
The rich stealing from the poor is a sin. The misery it is causing is widespread & real.
Therefore, I will suggest to you that supporting the Republican economic policy is a grevious sin. I leave it to you to work out with Christ if it a "mortal sin" for you.
I hope you enjoy your BMWs.
Thank you, Mr. Garcia! When
Thank you, Mr. Garcia!
When Jesus first announced the public ministry, he came to bring real Good News to the poor, to liberate the captives, etc.
In Matt 25 we read of the feeding of the hungry and the clothing of the naked and the sheltering of the homeless, with no exceptions due to immigration status, and the healing of the sick.
Nothing here about massive tax rebates and deferments
Of course, we as Catholics,
Of course, we as Catholics, or otherwise, should not fail to help with the very basic of needs of the truly poor who are legally in this country. Working through the parish system of charitable relief including food banks, we probably do that pretty well. There are some caveats, however. First of all, a poverty lifestyle in the US for those on food stamps, with government housing subsidy and access to charitable giving probably constitutes upper class living in most of the world. Secondly, we need to modulate our generosity to focus on those who truly cannot help themselves, such as the invalids, mentally incompetent and the very young. Currently, our corrupt welfare system encourages those on the dole to stay there. 40% of all babies are born to women on food stamps! Why are they having babies to make the situation worse?? The best and usually only charitable giving should be following some effort on the part of the able poor. This might include successful enrollment and completion of job training, community service work, etc. Otherwise our charity is merely creating a monster with an insatiable appetite for increasingly dwindling resources. Call it "tough love" or whatever, but please recall that the government only got into the charity business in the Great Depression. Now, entitlements are the major expenditure of government. That must end.
“The larger issues are the
“The larger issues are the moral and ethical ones of whether we want a society that is fair and just to all including the distribution of wealth or a society with a small corporate elite hoarding much of the country's wealth and income.”
Mario, I always enjoy reading your stuff, but until today I begin to realize that you still have some of our Latino revolutionary blood flowing through your veins. ¡¿How, in heavens name, are you ever going to convince us readers about that slob prophet Jesus of Nazareth wanting to set up his big plan for living and sharing with one another, just as brothers and sisters, so that everybody lives happily here on earth?!
According to some, Jesus even set up an organization to help us live HIS WAY, which he presents to us in his prayer: “OUR FATHER, THY KINGDOM COME, THY WILL BE DONE ON EARTH JUST AS IT IS IN HEAVEN.” THAT SAYS IT ALL: THE REASON FOR JESUS, LIVING, DYING, ARISING FROM THE DEAD AND CONTINUALLY GIVING US HIS SPRIT TODAY, WHICH OBVIOUSLY IS THE ONLY REASON FOR THAT ORGANIZATION, WHICH WE CALL “THE CHURCH”. Jesus was not worried about us saving our souls, that was in the hands of his loving Abbá “Daddy” Father. JESUS LIVED AND DIED TO CHANGE OUR WORLD HERE INTO THAT “OTHER POSSIBLE SOCIETY” THAT “OTHER POSSIBLE WORLD”, very unlike the one we have made for ourselves today, with wars, killings etc, etc., where every 4 seconds one of our sisters or brothers dies of hunger, and we continue merrily destroying our very own Mother Earth by our greed.
Today so many of us are still convinced that “being Catholic” is being “moral”, and that means to be against abortion, family planning, gay marriages, and of course get to church on Sunday on time for the collection, and it even used to include not eating meat on Fridays, all of which Jesus never even mentioned.
So Mario, with your pitch to change the world, best to start out by trying to change our “Catholic Moral Sense”, into something that gets us back closer to the essentials that Jesus spoke about and supposedly left in the hands of “his Church”.
Justiniano de Managua sep. 26.2011
Since the mid 1960's LBJ's
Since the mid 1960's LBJ's War On Poverty has transferred over $16 TRILLION dollars from people who earned it to people who did not earn it. Food Stamps, subsidized housing, Medicaid, etc... a total of 70 giveaway programs. Now we have even more poverty. Looks like we got what we paid for. Do we really want to pay for more of the same?
Since the mid 1960's LBJ's
Since the mid 1960's LBJ's War On Poverty has transferred over $16 TRILLION dollars from people who earned it to people who did not earn it. Food Stamps, subsidized housing, Medicaid... a total of 70 giveaway programs. Now we have even more poverty. Looks like we got what we paid for.
If this comment is being censored, please let me know.
My last comment: 1. Took on
My last comment:
1. Took on the idea, not the messenger.
2. Use appropriate language.
3. Kept to the point.
Not good enough, got censored anyway.
Post new comment