NCR on Kindle - NCR classifieds - YouTube - Twitter - Facebook - Email Alerts - RSS
Class warfare or economic justice?
At last, the Obama of 2008 has returned! On Monday, he gave a rousing speech in which he presented a plan for long-term deficit reduction.
As part of that, he advocated higher taxes on the wealthy, and he said he would veto measures that essentially charged the deficit to lower- and middle-income people and did not raise taxes on millionaires, or get rid of some of the most egregious loopholes.
The Republicans immediately cried, "class warfare!"
This is a phrase that has peppered American political speech for several decades now. But, I wonder, whenever I hear it, who is supposedly waging "class warfare" on whom?
In an age when poverty is increasing at an alarming rate, when the "wealth gap" between the rich and the poor is widening, and when the middle class is struggling to keep afloat -- it would seem that "class warfare" is being waged by corporate interests and their allies in Congress against those at the middle or bottom of the ladder.
What Obama articulated yesterday was not "class warfare." It was basic Christian social teaching.
It's not that his plan is a perfect embodiment of justice. But the principles he cited were about justice and fairness as the basis for economic policy.
Economic justice is not about charity; it is about structures of government, laws, policies, business, etc. that promote an equitable distribution of wealth, and even more important: an equitable distribution of opportunity.
The political rhetoric -- so common today -- that minimizes the role of government is ignorant of this basic principle of social teaching in Catholicism and in other faith traditions.





To the Left I ask "What part
To the Left I ask "What part of your income am I entitled to to meet what I consider my basic needs, courtesy of the coercive power of the State?"
To the Right I say "If you took better care of the needy yourself, no one would need to ask 'What part of your income am I entitled to to meet what I consider my basic needs, courtesy of the coercive power of the State?'"
Wasn't it GWB who said, "...
Wasn't it GWB who said, "... Some call them the haves. And the have mores. I call them "my base" "? In 2001?
It's all right to appeal to one side of the electorate, but not to the other? Then it's class warfare?
It is very unlikely that
It is very unlikely that Obama will get another piece of legislation through Congress which is not well liked by the GOP House. In the even more unlikely event that there is a tax hike on "the wealthy" enacted, it will get its teeth by limiting charitable, mortgage and other deductions that liberals claim now benefit "the wealthy". Allow me to suggest that most well off folks have NO mortgage and currently are the lifeblood of charities including the Catholic Church. If the Left slashes the ability to deduct charitable contributions, guess what is going to happen? Duh! I wish some of the Left Wing contributors to these blogs would use brain power instead of just finger power on the keyboard.
Post new comment