Charges dropped, anti-nuclear activists claim victory

KANSAS CITY, Mo. -- Success, it seems, is sometimes measured by what you don't have to put up with.

In a move that could be interpreted either as an indication of the full workload for local prosecutors or as a victory for activists, seven anti-nuclear organizers here were surprised Wednesday by a notification that a pending court case against them had been dropped for a lack of evidence.

The seven had been charged with disorderly conduct for a Sept 8. act of civil disobedience at the construction site of a major new nuclear weapons production facility being built here.

The new facility, known as the Kansas City Plant, which will make nonnuclear parts for nuclear weapons, is set to be the nation’s first new major nuclear weapons production facility in 32 years.

During the action the activists blocked access to the official groundbreaking ceremony for the new plant. They stepped in front of buses carrying local, state and federal officials and halted the flow of people into the ceremony for a few minutes.

The notification of the dropped charges comes about three weeks after two of the activists involved in the September action were arrested for interrupting a city council meeting Oct. 7 by unfurling a large banner while yelling.

In an email to activists, one of the organizers speculated that the builders of the new plant dropped the charges because they didn't want to "attract more publicity."

Currently a part of the Bannister Federal Complex, located about 13 miles south of the city’s downtown area, the Kansas City Plant is responsible for the production and assembly of approximately 85 percent of the nonnuclear components for the U.S. nuclear arsenal. The plant is set to be relocated beginning in 2012 to the new facility farther south.

The National Nuclear Security Administration, a division of the U.S. Department of Energy, has said the new facility will carry an estimated price tag of $673 million for construction and $1.2 billion over the next 20 years.

NCR has been following the Kansas City Plant for the past year. Here are some related stories:

I went along with much of the

I went along with much of the message in this blog having the emotions one might expect. However the last paragraph really made me sit up and take notice. To my mind, it's worth another whole story. First we're told that the pertinent portion of the Bannister complex produces/assembles 85%+/- of the nonnuclear parts for the US nuclear arsenal ("arsenal", notice). Then comes this factoid: the relevant governmental entity is a division of the U.S. Department of Energy! What a cockeyed world we live in. We posture, rant, rave, initiate sanctions because allegedly Iran and N. Korea are fronting nuclear arsenals by energy fixtures while our own Department of Energy is evidently doing the same in a sub-administration (the National Nuclear Security Administration)! Be afraid; very afraid of new budget requests for the Department of Energy.

Post new comment

NCR Comment code:

  1. Be respectful. Do not attack the writer. Take on the idea, not the messenger.
  2. Use appropriate language. Avoid vulgarities and slurs.
  3. Keep to the point. Deliberate digressions don't aid the discussion.

For more detailed guidelines, visit our User Guidelines page.

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
(if you have one; if not, leave this blank)
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <font> <swf> <swf list>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You may use <swf file="song.mp3"> to display Flash files inline

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This is to prove you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.