'Avatar': A theological movie

by Maureen Fiedler on Feb. 15, 2010

Sam Worthington and Zoe Saldana star in the animated movie 'Avatar.'Sam Worthington and Zoe Saldana star in the animated movie 'Avatar.'With snow piled high, and a movie theater nearby, I headed out yesterday to see "Avatar." It's been praised for cinematography (and that definitely is great), but I also found it a deeply theological movie.

First impression: it's one of the best anti-imperialist films I've ever seen. Whether one believes in the "just war theory" or not, this shows a clearly unjust war waged by earthlings in search of a precious mineral on the planet Pandora. And the crude earthlings leading the military assault are ready to destroy the civilization of Pandora to get what they want.

All this provides a thinly veiled analogy for U.S. wars in the Middle East, and it's not just because of a quest for mineral resources. "Avatar" portrays Pandora natives as having a "strange religion." For some Americans, Islam is a "strange religion." On Pandora, the strange faith is "tree worshipping." And except for a couple characters who cross over between the two worlds, there is no "interfaith dialogue," or anything close to it.

"Avatar" is also an adventure in ecological theology. The natives of Pandora explain the beauty of their creation to an earthling who eventually becomes one of them. They revere creation as a system, and they see themselves as part of that whole. The death of any creature brings sadness. (This might sound familiar to readers of Thomas Berry).

At one point, we are told that the earthlings had destroyed their own planet and came in search of others. And those earthlings are pursuing mineral wealth on Pandora with an openly-admitted greed that any moral theologian would condemn.

"Avatar" is far more than a movie; it's a theological adventure.

I agree with your take but

Submitted by RMP (not verified) on Feb. 15, 2010.

I agree with your take but did anyone tell the anonymous sources at the Vatican newspaper or Vatican Radio?

Would someone tell them?

http://www.thebostonpilot.com/article.asp?ID=11326

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/01/12/vatican-slams-avatar-prom_n_419...

Who is right?

When it comes to art, everyone can have an opinion.

The major difference between

Submitted by Fred2 (not verified) on Feb. 15, 2010.

The major difference between human religious ideology and the Na'vi's belief in Eywa, is that it's made clear in the movie that Eywa is not a deity, its not a stone idol, its not a totem pole, nor is it a crucifix, its presented as a biological entity.

I liked the movie a lot. But, I also wish Cameron had made the Na'vi a little less like human aborigines. That business with plugging into animals, trees, etc. Would have made their basic psychology quite different from human.

Post new comment

NCR Comment code:

  1. Be respectful. Do not attack the writer. Take on the idea, not the messenger.
  2. Use appropriate language. Avoid vulgarities and slurs.
  3. Keep to the point. Deliberate digressions don't aid the discussion.

For more detailed guidelines, visit our User Guidelines page.

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
(if you have one; if not, leave this blank)
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <font> <swf> <swf list>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You may use <swf file="song.mp3"> to display Flash files inline

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This is to prove you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.