Abuse crisis is actually a hierarchy crisis

The sex abuse crisis is not fundamentally about sex. The phrase is a convenient tag that has been applied to a deeper, ongoing problem that, at its core, has to do with power and authority and how it is used in the church.

The sex abuse crisis is actually a hierarchy crisis, it is a crisis of a culture that can no longer maintain its superiority by dint of office or by claim of some ontological difference from the rest of humankind. The overwhelming evidence shows that from parish priest to pope, those charged with protecting the community, on hearing that children were being sexually abused, acted first to protect the institutional church.

A central, sad truth runs through the story that has been unraveling for the past 25 years: When the community most needed its leaders to act as pastors they chose instead to act as princes, ignoring the problem all around them while employing every means available to spare the realm.

Church leaders have suggested an array of defenses. Most of them point to influences outside the clerical culture, to secularism, materialism, relativism, an oversexed society, hostile media, anti-Catholic lawyers, the reforms of the Second Vatican Council, and most absurd of all, the defense that what occurred in the church is being unduly highlighted since abuse of children occurs in every sector of society.

Surely some among the hierarchy must be figuring out by now that their response to the crisis is steeped in the very secularism and relativism that they condemn. Who among the bishops would stand in a pulpit and admonish a congregation to follow their example in dealing with serious sin: deny, attack the accuser, hide the crime, pay for silence if discovered, and admit “mistakes were made” only when public pressure makes disclosure inevitable?

One need not look outside the confines of the community for causes. It is beyond dispute now, as reporting of the crisis spreads worldwide, that the bishops used the secrecy of their privileged culture, the trust that those within the church and even the wider society conferred on them, as well as the labyrinthine and hidden protocols of their culture to shuffle offending priests and to avoid scrutiny by civil authorities.

The bishops’ strategy grew out of a model of governance owing more to the concept of royalty and to court behavior than to the demands of the Gospel. The royal model admits no wrong, requires absolute loyalty and is accountable to no one. Compassion has little place in the prince’s world.

Subscribe to NCR

Want to read more about important issues in the life of the Church? A subscription to NCR will keep you up to date and informed.

Subscribe now!

History shows, however, that kings and princes have a difficult time of it when the subjects become educated and understand that they have a right to know what’s going on, to be part of the governing process and to demand accountability of those in charge.

Fr. Donald Cozzens, who has written extensively about the clergy culture and its shadow sides, commented, “We are witnessing the collapse of the Roman Catholic empire -- not, I hope, of the Roman Catholic church. Empires, whether temporal or ecclesial, no longer work.”

The ecclesial empire no longer functions well because the people who do its work and project its message into the world no longer trust that their leaders will, perforce, do the right thing. It doesn’t work because the 21st century demands accountability of its institutions and leaders.

The fact that the crisis seems unending and in this latest round of reporting reaches to the papal apartment should come as no surprise given the Vatican’s record during the last papacy.

No better example exists of the corruption that extended to the highest levels of the church than the late Fr. Marciel Maciel Degollado, founder of the secretive order called the Legionaries of Christ.

In recent weeks NCR has documented some of the seamier elements of Maciel’s rise to power, a rise fueled by lavish gifts and an endless stream of cash for powerful figures in the curia. The late Pope John Paul II exemplified the blindness of the clerical culture, refusing for most of his long papal reign to acknowledge the persistent cries of abuse victims throughout the world. His action in the Maciel case was especially unfortunate. He aborted a Vatican investigation of Maciel, despite abundant warnings from a host of credible sources that Maciel had repeatedly sexually abused young seminarians in his charge. Instead, John Paul hailed Maciel as an “efficacious guide to youth” and bestowed special honors on the Legion. All the while, Maciel was making a mockery of the church and everything it should stand for, even as he manipulated the curia to his own ends.

Archbishop Diarmuid Martin of Dublin, Ireland, after reading the documentation assembled as part of an Irish government investigation of sexual abuse by priests in his archdiocese, predicted that we would become “a humbler church.” Martin arrives as a fresh voice, unencumbered by any involvement in the scandal. So far he has rendered a sober and honest assessment of the crisis and its causes. Perhaps Ireland, so thoroughly Catholic and so deeply shaken by the scandals there, could be the place where a new ecclesiology surfaces, one that is more inclusive and transparent than the royal model that is in decline. Perhaps it could be the birthplace of an ecclesiology that is humbler, not in a humiliated way, but in a way that takes stock of what a Christian community should be and how it should be present to the world.

Perhaps it could provide an example of the kind of serious and deep introspection that will be required of the clergy, especially the hierarchy, to get to the root causes of the scandalous behavior of the clergy culture and to discern what reforms are necessary to make it a culture of service and compassion.

Catholics want to walk with their leaders, not beneath them. We want to be deeply invested in the pilgrim’s search, not sent on a forced march. We want to be the people of God, not cowed serfs.

We want our pastors back. We’ve had quite enough of princes.

The hierarchy "problem" of

The hierarchy "problem" of protecting the image of the Church remains with us. The bishops act as if they have the "divine right of kings." We, the lay people should have a voice and a vote to elect all of our bishops LOCALLY and with term limits of five years with a renewable additional five years based on the service and how they acted as bishops. The Pope should not be involved in this process at all.

Bravo, I agree. Great to see

Bravo, I agree.
Great to see so many good comments from real NCR readers.

You know, by tomorrow, 5/3/10 the site will be inundated with "anonymous" comments sent over from the traddie sites.
To get an unadulterated sample of what people think you need to read the comments within 48 hrs of posting.

Sounds like all of you are

Sounds like all of you are arguing for something like an Anglican ecclesiology, more or less as found in the American Episcopal Church. Of course, you have nothing to learn from them. After all, they don't have the Blessed Sacrament, and their priests are just laymen (and, horrors, women!), dressed up in fancy clothes. Besides, they fight about everything, including you.

Thank you, thank you, thank

Thank you, thank you, thank you.

I wrote a letter in the same spirt of your editorial to the editor of our official Diocese newspaper in Wilmington, DE. My letter was written over four years ago when the reports of abuse in the US was becoming clear that this was a widespread problem - The gist of my letter that the failure was not the fact that priests may be guilty of pedophilia (a mental failure) but the bishops/cardinals were guilty of a far more serious offense - failure to properly manage their diocese, failure of following the tenants of faith, failure to guide their flock. You are so right that the flock, becoming more educated, will not be blindly led! (I am 61 years old and a practicing Catholic, active in my parish, and attended both Catholic grade schools and High School). Unfortunately this scandal has jaded the view of both of my adult children (both catholic schooled) regarding the church.

Would someone please nail the

Would someone please nail the above editorial to doors of the Vatican!?
The second reformation has begun.

I agree! The time has come

I agree! The time has come for the church to return to the Gosple mssage of Jesus Christ. Enough is ENOUGH!

Amen!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Amen!!!!!!!!!!!!!

AMEN,Amen, Amen! This

AMEN,Amen, Amen!

This editorial is right on. Wow!

Excellent editorial. The big

Excellent editorial. The big question is are the members the power-addicted hierarchy willing to change?

Mmm...I don't know about

Mmm...I don't know about wanting to go BACK to "our pastors;" I rather wonder if the Spirit isn't calling us to go forward into the very heart of Christ Consciousness and abandon the hierarchy all together. I am serious. Let's sit around the table and become Eucharist once again, which is ~ as Paul so often reminded us ~ our true identity.

Let's sit around the table as the priesthood we are all, male and female, called to be with the Holy Spirit as our guide. The medium IS the message!

Perhaps without a hierarchy, we can sell the Vatican and imitate Christ, feed the hungry, clothe the naked, establish ministries to comfort the afflicted...

Perhaps we can stop being a political institution that cries out loudly to protect the unborn and yet barely whispers a protest against the war based economy of the US.

Perhaps we might become Christ and follow Christ if we just disband the hierarchy all together. It might be worth a try...

Thank you Patty Kean. I think

Thank you Patty Kean. I think you hit the nail on the head when you suggested that the Roman Catholic Church not go back to the political institution that cries out to protect the unborn and yet shows little protest against war and social and economic injustice that leaves 80% of the world's population in poverty and at the mercy of charity. From the pulpit, that's all you will hear.

We cry out that God will have mercy but what our God cries out loudly for in all Scriptures is JUSTICE!!!!!!!!!!! Alas, justice is so much more challenging than charity, for most of us give only from our excess and that is NOT CHARITY! CHARITY is the "widow's mite"! Who of us gives their last dollar so someone else can eat?
Even if every Christian gave their last dollar, I don't believe we could eliminate poverty. It requires the firm will of people whose government is of the people, by the people and for the people, who can foster a system of economic and social justice for all.

Has it escaped you that the

Has it escaped you that the church has been at the forefront of social and economic reform for centuries now. Witness: the magnificent papal documents on justice, the missionary work among the poorest of the poor, the fight against oppression in the former Soviet Union, South America etc. etc.

A faith model that's

A faith model that's definitely worth exploring! Thanks, Patty. I for one would like to pursue this idea. I would suggest just one minor edit however; since only the hierarchy can disband itself why not just ignore it and maybe they'll simply go away.

If anyone is interested in discussing Patty's idea further, please feel free to contaqct me at rdemers@roadrunner.com

Patty, what, are you nuts!

Patty, what, are you nuts! Your idea is way too extreme; sounds like something Jesus would say! You are so right, Patty, thanks for your insight and let's pray that the Spirit enlightens all.

Patty the hierarchy is

Patty the hierarchy is disbanded. They are the only ones unaware of it!

...and Jesus would would say,

...and Jesus would would say, "Amen!"

Transparency leads to the

Transparency leads to the Truth.

Truth fosters Trust.

Trust brings forth followers searching for Truth.

Until there is transparency, accountability and democracy in electing popes and bishops for limited terms, there will be the strong likelihood of uncontrolled abuse of power by those in the Vatican hierarchy who think that they, and they alone, have the direct line of communication to God and Jesus as to what must be done for the good of the Church which consists of all Catholics world-wide. Human beings are flawed individuals as the Apostles and Saint Paul quickly learned after the Crucifixion and Resurrection.

History, experience, and constructive dissent have shown that until there is transparency in the actions of those in positions of power, the truth is hidden and can have damaging consequences affecting everyone who become the unknowing victims of secrecy until it is exposed and rectified. Truth is found in the light, not in the darkness, of all endeavors of mankind.
All Catholics—priests, nuns, and laity-- who are trying to follow the Commandments of Jesus suffer when the dark cloud of secrecy hovers over the Church.

Pope John XXIII was absolutely correct in calling for Vatican II with intelligent dialogue in creating common sense changes that would open the windows and let the winds of truth sweep throughout the Church. Those cardinals and bishops who were not happy rebelled against the changes of Vatican II when they finally came into power after the death of John XXIII. Instead of promoting Vatican II which would have lead to a friendly, transparent, serving church with efficient oversight, they instead created a handpicked hierarchy that wanted to go back to the good old days through “Reform” that smacked of royalty and servitude

Moral crises have flourished because of lack of prudent oversight and the fear by priests, nuns, and laity, of challenging the hierarchy and being ostracized. The troubles in the Church lay squarely on the shoulders of post Vatican II “Reformists.” Young people were already leaving the Church prior to Vatican II which is one of the reasons there was a call for Vatican II.

It’s time for the pope and hierarchy to go back to the Gospels, the letters of Saint Paul, and to dress and live in modern society not as relics of the Middles Ages. Discard princely clerical Robes and nuns’ Habits; they are nothing more than images of secular male royalty and women servitude of monarchies of centuries long past. Since when did Jesus and the Apostles dress as royalty and His women disciples wear habits instead of clothes of their day? If you were to listen to Jesus today on the “road to Emmaus”, you would be listening to Him in the clothing of today’s world, just as the two Apostles found out as they were talking to the “stranger” on the actual road to Emmaus.

If the hierarchies and the popes in the present and past had followed and practiced the Second Commandment that was clearly expressed by Jesus (Mathew 22. 34-40), in all likelihood there would have been no serious moral crises that have pervaded and still pervade the actions of the Vatican, such as the Inquisition and Reformation.

To truly follow in the footsteps of Jesus--by practicing His two Great Commandments--there must be no discrimination, no inequality against any human being. The Vatican has not yet learned the fullness of this truth—“Love Thy Neighbor as Thyself.”

Woe to those who think their proclamations are equal to these two great Commandments of Jesus.

Jesus is the Way the Truth and the Life.

WOW!!! So well written and

WOW!!! So well written and grounded in the words and actions of Jesus the Christ. Thank you for your words of love, truth, and justice.

I will be among the first to

I will be among the first to help burn and bury the trappings of the empire. Break apart the Curia and it's court-like environs, get rid of all those robes, mitres, and other royal attire. Start to look more like the Jesus you all claim to emulate, but wear common clothing, as he did. Then do what you say you are about - live the Beatitudes. Be real world leaders in the way you act, allow everyone to participate in the priesthood of the church, as proclaimed at Vatican II. Your humility will be most welcome. Those who choose to opt out of the reform may quietly find something else to do to serve God.
I agree with your last lines, "We want to be the people of God, not cowed serfs. We want our pastors back. We've had quite enough of princes."
I'd say, let the princes be for fairytales.

Jesus did not wear common

Jesus did not wear common clothes. He wore a seamless robe which in today's parlance would be designer clothes If he did wear common clothes then they would not have been worth the trouble of throwing dice to see who would get his robe.

as I remember it, the

as I remember it, the tradition was that Mary, Jesus's Mother wove that seamless robe. If the Blessed Virgin is a designer, OK.

"We want our pastors back.

"We want our pastors back. We've had quite enough of princes."

Good luck.

Without the support of this monarchical pope, his episcopal lackeys, and an entrenched curia, renewal including reform won't happen. They are too heavily invested in the existing system.

And most pewsitters will continue to dutifully put their shekels into the weekly collection plates.

Not a good prognosis.

I am afraid that you are

I am afraid that you are absolutely correct.

You let the abusers off too

You let the abusers off too easy. Regardless of what you think about the bishops, these priest abusers were the ones who stole the innocence of so many children. You are letting these pedophiles off too easy and shame on you!

Sexual abuse of anyone, let alone children, is about one's desire to have power over another. Never forget that. The bishops weren't the ones abusing these children, the priests were. You blaming the parent for what the child did because the parent did not handle things correctly.

Sometimes in your pursuit of "reforming the church" NCR sounds just plain silly and at times very offensive.

Of course it is about sex and how one uses their urges to control other people for their own self gratification regardless who their victims are.

If the "child" commits a

If the "child" commits a serious crime and the "parent" covers for the "child", and tries to intimidate witnesses to the crime or victims of the crime (as many bishops did) or to buy them off, then the "parent" is as guilty as the "child".

And you Mara are ignoring

And you Mara are ignoring where exactly those priests got their power to abuse, and the fact it was rarely taken away from them, and the fact they were all too often given fresh territory in which to abuse.

Mara, you are correct in

Mara, you are correct in stating "sexual abuse of anyone, let alone children, is about one's desire to have power over another." It is an abuse of power. Because the Bishops covered up these sexual crimes the priest perpetrators abused more children. The Bishops' secrecy caused more children to be sexually abused. The secrecy was an abuse of power,and all the children who were abused because of the Bishops' secrecy are the responsibility of the Bishops. This is why the Bishops are guilty of sexually abusing children. The fact is that if the Bishops had reported the original crimes to the police the would not be guilty. They have no training or expertise in how to inverstgate these kinds of charges. Your parent-child analogy does not apply to adults. Even if you are refering to obedience within the hierarchy's chain of command, obedience can never be used to cover up crimal activity. Anyone who covers up a crime is guilt of aiding and abbeting a criminal activity. The bishops involved would still be guilty even if the perpetrating piest never abused any child again after the cover-up, Of course we know that those priests who were reassigned did in fact abuse again. The bishops are all guity of the sexual abuse of children.

I don't agree with all you

I don't agree with all you say but you do point to the fact that the editor is on some sort of hobby-horse and rant again, trying to make the abuse crisis about power in shady vatican corridors. Sure, the reprehensible cover-ups were about self-protection by the few but don't forget that the abuse crisis is really about the vistims and those who abused them. These were obviously not fit to be pastors and should never have been given positions in the church. Screen ing of candidates has improved immensely (most of the cases surfacing are old ones) but we have a long way to go. I happen to think that we still have many good pastors as it happens, who don't seem to be obsessed with power at all!

Only a dolt could think that

Only a dolt could think that a crisis of sexual abuse is not fundamentally about sex. Priests and bishops have given in to sinful temptations of lust. Stop trying to rewrite history in order to advance your anti-hierarchy agenda in the Church. Stop playing the tired card of the "educated laity" versus the "ignorant hierarchy". As evidenced by many of the columns and agreeing comments on this website, the dissident laity is hardly well educated.

Of course sexual abuse is

Of course sexual abuse is about sex. However it is also about the abuse of power and it has been compounded by the abuse of power to protect those in power as much as the abuser.

Of course it's about SEX!

Of course it's about SEX! However, IF the church would have acted in the proper manner in the begining, prosecuting and removing the priests from mininstry several things would have been DIFFERENT. 1.) the same priest would not have been re-assigned only to continue the abuse. 2.) other pedophiles would be aware of the consequences and MAYBE think twice before acting. 3.) young men and women would be more aware and not be so "trusting of father". Of course it's about sex, but no matter what you want to believe about the hierarchy of the church, they have been "ignorant" and we, the "educated laity" are tired of them sitting on their laurels!
Even to this day, they have yet to admit that THEY MADE A MISTAKE...........ALL OF THEM! Ultimately I think that's all anyone wants. Quit placing blame on everyone else's back! Look in the mirror!16

Dysfunctional power and

Dysfunctional power and authority, clericalism and its golden calf of celibacy is what allowed the sex abuse scandal to be covered up and ignored for so long. Yes, it has to do with sexual deprivation also but that is not the essential reason why it festered and took so long for it to be discovered. It cannot be cured until the hierarchy is cured of its out of bounds clericalism. Celibacy is only there to protect and defend clericalism which is the high status of clergy. But it also tells us that celibacy is a lie for many priests and bishops. It is unnatural and unnecessary for most priests to be celibate. The married priesthood should be reinstated in the Latin Rite as it was in the time of Jesus, when the Deposit of Faith was set, and for the first twelve centuries. Celibacy must be a free choice not a mandated job requirement. The cause of the sex abuse crisis is complex but the way the church abuses power and authority is an essential cause. I is a hierarchy crisis. (Married Priests USA)http://www.orgsites.com/ny/married-priests-now/

Pedophilia is about power.

Pedophilia is about power. Read the scientific studies. Don't be a dolt!

James Kincaid argued in 1991

James Kincaid argued in 1991 that this "pedophilia is about power" meme is just a myth that needs to be deconstructed.

mmm....errr....ahhh...let me

mmm....errr....ahhh...let me get this straight. You are arguing that after all this evil, we should all still trust in the present organizational model for leadership in the Catholic Church? Is this a correct assessment of your views?

If so, I don't know what to say. I am truly dumbfounded. I just don't know what to think or your paradigms.

We STILL need a hierarchy based on present organizational structures? Is that what you are saying?

Rape is never about sex. It

Rape is never about sex. It is about power.

If it were about sex it would

If it were about sex it would be called abusive sex - it's about abuse, of power, trust, access, control of information and a whole raft of things. In the case of the perpetrators it is also about serious mental disorder, a not too uncommon thing in our high stress world.

It would seem well to remember that Christ created a Eucharistic community of faith, not a movement of personal piety, precisely so that we might minister to one another according to our genuine needs and not according to some idealized notion of human nature that could be actualized in an all-knowing, hierarchical, and increasingly secularized (i.e. pre-occupied with preservation of the status quo) enterprise.

Bravo!

Bravo!

Your editorial today about

Your editorial today about the 'royal model in decline' embraces a trope about the nature of hierarchy which relies on a secular notion of kingship which is not a profitable analytical tool when applied to the Church. Employed in the way in which it is, the point becomes a blunt and inaccurate tool in the hands of those who see the Magisterium as the problem. It is simply preposterous to ascribe the cause of the sexual abuse by clergy to the existence of hierarchy. You talk about 'deep intrispection and prayer that will be required of the clergy, especially the hierarchy' as if somehow the massive experience of the Church with prayer were absent. It is not the command to pray always which needs changing: it is the culture of intellectual disobedience (and the failure to pray) that has permeated the Church and a secular intellectual culture which wilfully fails to acknowledge objectivity that has got us to this point. As always, the problem with evil begins in the heart of man, not in the organisational chart of the Church. That is where your call to reform should begin.

If there id evil in the heart

If there id evil in the heart of man, shouldn't that man have those evil urges and desires checked by a system that mandates honesty, accountability, and transparency? Yes, it was the abusers fault. But isn't there something fundamentally wrong with a system that makes it so easy to cover these things up? If the bishops are responsible for oversight of pedophile priests, who has oversight of the - what? - 3000 bishops in the world? The Pope? That's a whole lot of reviewing to do!

Aha, but the structure won't change, will it? You and I both know that. And anyone who criticizes it is labeled an enemy of Holy Mother Church, even if they are trying to be a friend of the Gospel. So I'll tell you what. In leiu of a fundamental change in church governance, let's just keep supporting independent Catholic journalism such as NCR, even if they do smell of "anti-hierarchialism" at times. At least they have the guts to ask the tough questions of the Bishops and the Pope when no one else will. Sort of like the Prophet Nathan with King David. Oops, there I go using a an earthly "royalty" analogy from the Bible to describe the way we run the Holy Roman Catholic Church. How dare I?

It is a free country with

It is a free country with free speech -so far!
"we run the Holy Roman Catholic Church'?-I thought the Holy Spirit was in charge?
"shouldn't that man have those evil urges and desires checked by a system that mandates honesty, accountability, and transparency" by all means and the Church has begun the process of making sure religious training is overhauled and individual religious orders look into the discipline and mentoring within their orders. Benedict said on his first Friday homily as Pope that he had begun the task of cleaning out the filth but it is not an instant process it takes time to undo the damage and confusion.

John Thom on Apr. 30,

John Thom on Apr. 30, 2010.

You stated:

"Your editorial today about the 'royal model in decline' embraces a trope about the nature of hierarchy which relies on a secular notion of kingship which is not a profitable analytical tool when applied to the Church. Employed in the way in which it is, the point becomes a blunt and inaccurate tool in the hands of those who see the Magisterium as the problem. It is simply preposterous to ascribe the cause of the sexual abuse by clergy to the existence of hierarchy. You talk about 'deep intrispection and prayer that will be required of the clergy, especially the hierarchy' as if somehow the massive experience of the Church with prayer were absent. It is not the command to pray always which needs changing: it is the culture of intellectual disobedience (and the failure to pray) that has permeated the Church and a secular intellectual culture which wilfully fails to acknowledge objectivity that has got us to this point. As always, the problem with evil begins in the heart of man, not in the organisational chart of the Church. That is where your call to reform should begin."
----------------------------------

If it looks like a snake, crawls on its belly like a snake, hisses with a forked tongue like a snake---then it is a snake, John Thom.

Study Church History. Read about how the Popes after Constintine wanted to unite themselves with the secular state. Read about how Popes determined that they and they alone were to tell secular leaders how to govern their kingdoms. Read about how Popes wanted the luxury that the French kings could provide them and their relatives and moved to France for 60 years (the Babylonian Captivity). Read about how a Medici Pope spent, what would amount to $1,000,000 dollars in today's currency, on his installation party. He also stated that "It pleased God to bestow the papacy upon us to enjoy. And enjoy it, we shall." And of course, who could forget Pope Pius IXth? He did his darnest to return the Church to the time period of Innocent III.

It all comes down to governance, John Thom. Talk around the issue all you wish. If the Apostles remained in the Upper Room praying AFTER the Holy Spirit came----there would have been no preaching of the Gospel. We are to pray as if everything depends on God. And we are to work as though everything depends on us. It is time to get to work---and change the organization that has ignored Jesus' injunction to the Apostles. It is the role of the papacy and bishops to SERVE, not to RULE.

John Thom. Your defense of

John Thom. Your defense of the hierarchy seems to imply that there is nothing wrong with the way it functions. I do not understand how you can ignore the fact that the bishops of so many countries as well as the vatican have kept thousands and thousands of sexual abuse cases secret and that the secrecy of the hierarchy caused additioal thousands of children to be abused. The fact that policy of secrecy is so widespread clearly is enough evidence to deduce that it is a universal policy throughout the church. If this secrecy is not fully admitted and repudiated you can be sure future generations of children will be abused.(history has a way of repeating itself)All the bishops are guilty of abuses of power against children.Measures need to be taken to insure that the hierarchy is changed so that this scandal does not happen again. Reform of the hierarchy is essential. If you defend them out of blind ignorance you are in good company, but beware you are enabling their crimes against children. Blind faith in the hierarchy like blind obedience to the hierarchy is something that should only be given to God.It is a dangerous error to give such allegience to the hierarchy. Trust only in God.

When a priest uses his

When a priest uses his position of power to seduce a child and to use that child for his own sexual purpose, that priest demonstrates a complete lack of empathy for human beings and a total lack of respect for the teachings of Jesus Christ. The Roman Catholic Church claims to be the Church founded by Jesus Christ and led by the Holy Spirit. The fact that perpetrator priests have been and are being protected by members of the Church hierarchy creates a huge disconnect in the minds of many faithful Catholics who believe this claim.

If, indeed, the Church is founded on the teachings of Jesus Christ and led by the Holy Spirit, then one would be led by the inaction of the Church hierarchy to believe either that Jesus and the Holy Spirit approve of priests abusing little children or that the Church hierarchy is not doing what it is supposed to be doing and getting rid of those priests who are unfit for their offices. I am no theologian, but I have seen no Biblical evidence that would lead me to believe that Jesus would approve of His servants abusing little children or anyone else, for that matter. So why have the Pope, the bishops, and all the other members of the Church hierarchy been sitting around in their expensive robes, riding in their expensive vehicles, and doing little or nothing to get rid of the offending priests?

The clock is ticking, the Church is losing credibility, and still the hierarchy are just talking. Dump the Pope and dump the hierarchy. Use the money saved to bring some light into this dark world by implementing the teachings in Christ's Gospel and by doing what He asked when He said, "Feed my sheep." One bright light within the Roman Catholic Church is its strong belief in Peace and Justice. Now is the time for that light to brighten the world for all!

The priest abuser has learned

The priest abuser has learned how to abuse from the church's own abusive policies. Clericalism is an abusive system. It abuses the priest and the people alike. Neither priest or people have a voice in the church and cannot elect or impeach a pastor or bishop or pope. Until the abusive power and authority of the Church changes, nothing else will change. (Married Priests USA) http://www.orgsites.com/ny/married-priests-now/

" So why have the Pope, the

" So why have the Pope, the bishops, and all the other members of the Church hierarchy been sitting around in their expensive robes, riding in their expensive vehicles, and doing little or nothing to get rid of the offending priests? "
It is not true.
In all the press stories you and many others are forgetting all the faithful religious including bishops who are living holy lives.
This evil was well hidden Pedophilia thrives on secracy lies and manipulation.
You have only to read the case reported in NCR recently about the continued efforts of a bishop to rid the Church of an offending priest and how he managed to evade justice and exploit canon law.
The Pope has recognised the universality of this evil and he insisted one body deal with it as the first step to stop the bureaucratic size of the Church being exploited and used by abusers. Given time and support the Holy Father will complete the job.
Your suggestion of "Dump the Pope and dump the hierarchy" is music to the devil's ears because it is the Pope and holy bishops and religious who can put him to flight. He would be delighted if we abandon loyalty and obedience to our courageous commanders in this battle against him and the evil he wreaks amongst souls.

NCR does not share the

NCR does not share the ecclesiology taught in Lumen Gentium. The Church is Hierarchical. Get over it, it's divinely instituted and willed. Your snarky editorial shows contempt for the Catholic Church, not love for it. Let me guess, you'd replace the Magisterium with your panel of heretical "young voices"?

Do I understand you to say

Do I understand you to say that the Church is, to put it in a nutshell, the hierarchy and the Magisterium, and all of the rest of us great unwashed are merely ancillary, called to respect our betters and shell out our funds and our prayers for their support? If so, you are very much mistaken. The Church, as established by Jesus and entrusted to his followers, is the people of God, the Body of Christ, all of us who have been charged by our baptism to love one another and be responsible for all, including the least among us. Bishops and priests, up to and including the Holy Father, are supposed to be part of that servant People of God, not royal functionaries who place themselves on pedestals and expect to be treated like princes. I don't think that the apostles acted like that, and their modern-day successors shouldn't either.

"... it's divinely instituted

"... it's divinely instituted and willed."

There, in a nutshell, is the mythical premise upon which the sandals of Jesus have been turned into satin slippers shuffling along gilded hallways. A bottom-up Christology fails to find scriptural basis for such a hierarchical system. A top down Christology would seek to find it everywhere and happily succumb to the patriarchal remembrance of Jesus life and commands.

Debborah, The Church is the

Debborah, The Church is the people of God. We owe our loyalty to God alone;
yes, through the church when she leads toward God, but alone if she leads
toward human egoism, self-gratification, and sinfulness.

Deb,sin is sin.What does

Deb,sin is sin.What does "Hierarchical" have to do with it? You and I can't play with 15 year old boys, but it's ok for priests? It's all about what we were taught 60 plus years ago, No SCANDAL ALLOWED. Boy they sure blew that one, and no pun intended. Keep the faith, what's left of it

While I agree completely that

While I agree completely that this is a hierarchy crisis, I wouldn't go so far as saying that it's not also a sex abuse crisis. It's not an either/or. The thousands of cases of priests sexually abusing vulnerable children and adolescents created an enormous crisis for untold number of victims and their families irrespective of how shamefully the hierarchy handled the reported abuse. If those thousands of victims had come forward and reported the abuse and the hierarchy had handled every case perfectly, those children and their families would still have endured a horrific crisis. But the hierarchy crisis exacerbated the sexual abuse crisis and exposed a hierarchy crisis that, as your editorial says so well, needs to be addressed as forcefully as the sexual abuse crisis.

The dysfunctional hierarchy

The dysfunctional hierarchy of the Roman Catholic church is the cause of so much that is wrong with the institution. The priests and bishops who secured a position for themselves on pedestals of gold seem to have forgotten that this faith community began in a manger of straw in a stable two thousand years ago. The physical trappings, the power and the prestige that come with being a member of the church hierarchy at whatever level have clouded so many clergy mindsets. The rampant neo-conservatism and condescending attitude of “Father is right” being engendered in so many seminaries only leads to further problems. While bishop Martin of Ireland may be open to dialogue, it will be interesting to see where and when he imposes limits on that dialogue, which indeed he will. Renewal of the Roman Catholic church is unlikely to come from within the hierarchy because of its tendency toward self-preservation. Renewal will only when the laity are considered as full equal partners in church management and the parish priest becomes part of the team, instead of its defacto leader.

Nonsense. It has NOTHING to

Nonsense. It has NOTHING to do with such trite and overused sociology 101 type concepts of "power" and "authority". Man, it's almost like editors have this laminated card with "angles" to take on articles: power, authority, feminism, racism, class struggle. Yawn.

The lay are just as responsible for the priestly abuse problem. Our own infidelity to our own Faith has effects on priests over years and years. We are one body.

Well, maybe you have been

Well, maybe you have been unfaithful to your own Faith. However, I have been very faithful to mine which is why I am in complete agreement with this editorial. Nothing in the royal hierarchy of the church reflects the Jesus of the Gospels.

Great editorial. At last a

Great editorial. At last a realization that the culprit is not sexuality, homosexuality, "misinterpretations" of Vatican II, media (Masonic, Jewish, secularist -- take your pick) conspiracy. Nor is it a public relations crisis (as if a competent group of Madison Avenue wizards could fix it). The culprit may indeed be secularism, but if so, only because the Vatican resorts to secularist defenses and methods. (If Vatican II is being misinterpreted, maybe Vatican I, with its supposed vision of an absolutist papal monarchy is being misinterpreted even worse).

The culprit, I'm afraid, lies in the church's structures of governance, in the clericalist culture they promote, and in the view (dare one suggest it?) that presumed "Catholic" values might be at loggerheads with, and take precedent over, Christian values.

It's as simple as the math question NRC is now going to ask me: the sum od 1+0.

Excommunication of pope-kings

Excommunication of pope-kings and priests and bishops is the automatic requisite of the horrific abuses AND cover-ups; canon law requires that the perpetrators of these scandalous sins no longer be considered in communion with the organization. There is no legitimate pope; many bishops and priests are also dis-empowered for the very same reasons.

Catholics want to walk with

Catholics want to walk with their leaders,not beneath them. We want to be deeply invested in the pilgrim's search, not sent on a forced march. We want to be the people of God, not cowed serfs.
We want our pastors back. We've had quite enough of princes."
This has been my feeling/idea for a very long time. This sums it up for me for now.

Well I don't see any big

Well I don't see any big heads rolling yet. Law, Burke and Levada are indeed princes with a past. If bishops accountability.org is reporting the issues credibly, these three have had a lot to do with the cover-ups etc.
I don't understand why they were promoted up in light of all the problems re: sexually abusive clergy in their respective dioceses here in the US. The above article is a pretty acute assessment of the problem. Who wrote it?
Are they afraid to write their name?

How true, I will say; that I

How true, I will say; that I doubt this is a forerunner of the collapse of the Catholic Church. As a Church, we have weathered similar foolishness by our clergy, the Inquisition is one example.

I am a Roman Catholic; I worship within the Holy Roman Catholic Church. I do not worship any Holy Roman Catholic Clergy. I will accept the fact that they, through Holy Orders do give order to our worship. Not, orders. I think that some of our priests and bishops need to remember that they are called to their vocation as servants, not to be served. In the Seattle Archdiocese, from my perspective, our clergy for the most part understand the idea of service. There are some, who were formed many years ago, who do think of themselves as above the people, not through their word, but their actions.

What many in the world and unfortunately this will include many professed Catholics, do not understand; WE are the Church, the people. I will repeat; some are called through Holy Orders, to give order to our worship. We are all called through our Baptism to be priest, prophet and king.

We as a church knew of these despicable acts in some form, usually as they occurred, we did not cry out in anguish and pain at these acts. We need to cry out now and force an end to the lies and deceit some clergy have fostered. It is our responsibility as the Church to do so. It will be painful, it will be embarrassing, and it will be the Christ like thing to do. Also, we need to do this to support the clergy and religious who have served us for years and are now smeared by the disgusting few.

And then, we as a Church will be better followers of Christ.

Outstanding editorial. The

Outstanding editorial. The monarchical, hierarchical, aloof, secretive model of church is apparently in its death throes. We need a church where leaders are there to serve and not be served. Instead of "leaders" obsessed with their own rank, privileges, and gaudy vestments, we need people, both male and female, who represent the whole church and not just a tiny part of it. Then we can respond to the Gospel and not an imitation Roman Empire.

Interesting that you never

Interesting that you never mentioned how Cardinal Ratzinger/Pope Benedict XVI opposed Fr. Maciel Degollado. Interesting how you never mention the role of heretical prelates such as Archbishop Weakland and Cardinal Mahoney in the cover-up or the role of women Religious in the sex abuse. Interesting how you never mention how widespread sexual immorality among the liberal clergy of the late 1960s/1970s/and early 1980s has been/continues to be in the name of self-actualization and moral relativism. Interesting how you now try to use this crisis to do what you always do anyway, which is to attack God's priesthood and the holy Catholic faith. Interesting how you refused to admit that the modernism in Catholic theology and the Protestantism in Catholic liturgy that you continue to blindly champion is a huge part of this and the many other scandals that have buffeted Catholicism over the past 45 years since they are what leads to a loss of faith and the resulting infidelity to vows of chastity and promises of celibacy along with those of obedience. Interesting how you sanctimonously accuse the Magisterium and the divinely constituted hierarchical nature of the true Church of arrogance while refusing to honestly apologize and make humble amends yourself for all the destruction that you have wrought through this publication and the many allies that you have in corrupt chanceries, pseudo-Catholic universities, and Wiccan convents. It would be interesting if next time you want to point to the sliver in the eye of an orthodox priest you would just for a moment consider if there is a plank in your own. Years from now there will be outrage on the part of Catholics when they finally see what you progressives have been doing all along behind the scenes; what we have seen of your public dissent pales in comparison to the evil that you have brought forth in the very secrecy that you pretend to condemn.

As my favourite Laugh in

As my favourite Laugh in character used to say
"VEEEERY INTERESTING"!
Gus is spot on The Laity are beginning to wake up to what has been taking place and to quote Barnum
"You can fool some of the people for some of the time but you can't fool all of the people all of the time"

Gus, you are dead wrong. My

Gus, you are dead wrong. My husband was abused by his parish priest during the years of 1944-47, way before the "liberal 60's, 70's and 80's" and you are just trying to hang this terrible scandal on the changes of Vatican II that I think you do not approve of. This is a scandal in the church that goes way back further than your rant suggests. When my husband went to his spritural advisor, in a minor seminary, he was met with SILENCE. Why?, because it was not an isolated problem, as my husband as a young adolescent thought, but because it was widespread (see the story of Marcel Maceil which has it's beginnings at the same time. No, this is not the result of a "liberal" church; this is much more than that.

Gus, I find your circular

Gus, I find your circular logic interesting. I read the editorial as saying that the time for a monarchical model of being church is on its way out regardless of the decades-long variety of attempts to retain it by the people in various levels of that monarchy. I read the editorial as saying that these same people wedded to the monarchical model pointed (and still point) to anything, ANYTHING ELSE but an outmoded way of being church as causes of the scandal.

Personally this editorial made much sense to me. I'm reminded of something attributed to Gandhi "First they ignore you; then they laugh at (ridicule) you; then they fignt (in ever increasing harshness); then you win!" (Actually I prefer to read this as "then they capitulate"). I'm deeply struck by the parallel steps taken by this instititutional/monarchical campaign to maintain an outmoded model of church to the steps the Brits took in India and that Gandhi cataloged.

Agreed; Weakland, Cummins,

Agreed; Weakland, Cummins, Hubbard, Mahoney, Daneels, Bernardin...

The grim roll call of the enabler and even abuser bishops, infused w/ the 'spirit of VII'.

Not seeing Bruskievitz on the Wall of Shame. Maybe a lesson there in that...

Not seeing Bruskievitz on the

Not seeing Bruskievitz on the Wall of Shame. Maybe a lesson there in that...

What is going on in the darkness of the Diocese of Lincoln, Nebraska will come out someday, too...wait for it.

How come you always leave

How come you always leave Dupree and Law and Groer and Spellman off your list?

Amen, brothers! 100% on the

Amen, brothers! 100% on the mark.

This is the best commentary

This is the best commentary I've seen so far! Totally agree. Thanks NCR editors!

Post new comment

NCR Comment code:

  1. Be respectful. Do not attack the writer. Take on the idea, not the messenger.
  2. Use appropriate language. Avoid vulgarities and slurs.
  3. Keep to the point. Deliberate digressions don't aid the discussion.

For more detailed guidelines, visit our User Guidelines page.

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
(if you have one; if not, leave this blank)
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <font> <swf> <swf list>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You may use <swf file="song.mp3"> to display Flash files inline

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This is to prove you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.