Over at RNS, Mark Silk takes issue with my point about not rushing to shout "hypocrite" in the Colorado hospital case in which lawyers for a Catholic Hospital argued that a wrongful death suit on behalf of two unborn children was not recognizable at bar because Colorado law does not recognize unborn children as persons. He makes a good point that we who consider ourselves pro-life should be willing to demonstrate our commitment even - I would say especially - when it conflicts with our own material interests. I hope the hospital made a good faith offer to settle the suit to the bereaved father. But, my point was not that lawyers are permitted to make the best legal argument available, even if that argument makes their client look hypocritical. But, this was not an extravagant, creative legal argument that was put forward. The lawyers simply stated the legal facts before the court. I still don't think the hypocrisy charge applies in this case.
NCR Email Alerts
Sign up to get NCR updates by email. Existing users: change your preferences here. Enter your email address in the box below and click “Go.”
In This Issue
- Editorial: Seize this moment of encounter
- History reveals the long view of marriage
- Synod to be culmination of two years' preparation, consultation
- Special Section (in print only): Fall Books
Some articles are only available in the print newspaper and Kindle edition.
Schönborn: New synod procedure a 'huge step forward' compared to 'frustrating experience' of former synodsby Christa Pongratz-Lippitt NCR Today
by NCR Staff The Francis Chronicles