Not sure how I missed this, but the U.S. Supreme Court has decided to hear the case involving the Susan B. Anthony List and former Congressman Steve Driehaus. The SBA charged that Driehaus' vote for the Affordable Care Act was a vote for taxpayer funded abortions. An Ohio law forbids political ads that contain a known lie. It appears the Supreme Court will decide the case on procedural grounds, but would it not be fascinating if they get to the heart of the issue: Who decides what, in political debate, constitutes a lie?
NCR Email Alerts
Sign up to get NCR updates by email. Existing users: change your preferences here. Enter your email address in the box below and click “Go.”
In This Issue
- Napa Institute gathers US church's well-heeled and high-ranking devout
- Vatican asks for wide input on 2015 synod, not based on doctrine
- Letter calls on Vatican to investigate Milwaukee bankruptcy
- Special Section: Theology
Not all of our content is online. Subscribe to receive all the news and features you won't find anywhere else.