A modern Adam and Eve re-enter paradise

They would never have thought about themselves in this way. In fact, they didn't think much about themselves at all. That is what made them both great and good at the same time, a combination that is elusive in what we might call the Age of the Drone that refers not to silent airborne weapons that blow people up suddenly, but to the grating windblown political pundits who bore people to death slowly.

I refer to Sr. Anita Caspary and Marty Hegarty, who broke free of the shackles of time within a few days of each other, symbolizing a fresh incarnation of Adam and Eve for our time. They were cast out of the institutional Garden of the highly clericalized Eden of pre-Vatican I American Catholicism.

Marty, a distinguished Chicago priest who embodied the spirit of Vatican II, had to leave because the clerical garden had no room for him after he fell in love with his beloved Carole. The then reigning, emphasis on reigning, archbishop, John Cardinal Cody, who took no prisoners, thought that former priests, like Old Testament scapegoats, should be driven out to wither in the wilderness to spare Chicago from their bad influence.

Sr. Anita was the distinguished head of the Immaculate Heart Order of nuns after serving as president of their Los Angeles College. She also embodied the spirit of Vatican II, but, because she implemented the modernization of religious life that the Council had urged, was barred, along with her community, from teaching in the Los Angeles Catholic schools by the then-reigning, underscore the emphasis on reigning, archbishop, James Francis Cardinal McIntyre, who might have been inclined to shoot prisoners in his determined suppression of any Vatican II transformation of religious life that he viewed as the moral equivalent of The Russians Are Coming.

Marty remained in Chicago, as did many former priests, while Cody railed from his North Side mansion whose tables, chairs and sofas sagged under bags of unopened mail. That 19-chimneyed edifice was chronically dark, sparking wagers about whether Cody paid his electric bill or lived somewhere else. For Cody, no fate was bad enough for ex-priests, whom he urged employers not to hire and with whom, as I can tell you from my own experience, he refused even to shake hands at a casual meeting.

Marty not only remained in Chicago, but he remained to the end of his days a true priest. He also worked as an industrial psychologist, but he somehow found time to establish an organization, WEORC, the Old English for work, that served as an exchange and a network to find jobs for men and women who had left the ministry or other Church work. He not only undermined the Cardinal's efforts to keep ex-priests from finding employment in Chicago (I add parenthetically that he vainly tried to get the valiant then-president of Loyola University to fire me) but created an organization that, although he turned it over to others, is still operating today.

Subscribe to NCR

Want to read more about important issues in the life of the Church? A subscription to NCR will keep you up to date and informed.

Subscribe now!

One can sing joyful songs of Marty's work as a mediator, ever helping others to reconcile or keep in touch, but mournful strains arise from the declining conflicted years of poor Cardinal Cody, who would have succeeded imperially if he had become archbishop of Chicago in 1935 instead of 1965, and who died alone with a hired nurse in attendance after enduring stormy years of newspaper investigations into his finances. That his successor, Joseph Cardinal Bernardin, opened the books to prove the charges wrong came too late to comfort him in his beleaguered last years.

Sr. Anita was attacked by Cardinal McIntyre, who brought his earlier businessman's experience to his shrewd balancing the books and building the physical plant of the Los Angeles archdiocese after World War II. He had no patience, however, for anyone, bishop, priest or nun, who dared to exercise the new freedom to function in the modern world encouraged by Vatican II. McIntyre wanted to force a priest he thought rebellious to go through a medieval ceremony recanting his modest independence by ceremonially kissing the cardinalatial shoe.

He also hounded the late Bishop James P. Shannon, one of the brightest and most able of American bishops, into resignation after Shannon had discussed the possibility of questioning such disciplines as celibacy on a nationally televised program on the Church. In a swift strike against the Immaculate Heart Sisters, who had served for decades in their teaching mission in Los Angeles, he cut them loose rather than tolerate them as independent and educationally qualified women who were more dedicated to the Church as a people than to the Church as an organization.

McIntyre, whose career, dedicated to circling the same dusty track despite fiery crashes and multicar pileups now and then, was not prepared to deal with the valiant woman, Anita Caspary, who led 300 sisters, after they lost an appeal to Rome, to seek release from their vows and to form an independent ecumenical group to carry on their work. McIntyre fulminated, but there was nothing he could do to interfere with Anita Caspary's readiness to leave the institutional Eden for the real world outside. The community continues today with 160 members.

Marty and Anita lived out a contemporary version of the Myth of the Garden. The difference is that they did not sin but were sinned against and were driven into exile not because they wanted to be like gods but because they wanted to serve God's people with goodness and purity of heart. Which of these, do you think, went home to Heaven justified: Marty Hegarty, who did so much good, or Cardinal Cody, who had fantasies that Marty could only work harm? Anita Caspary, who freely and bravely gave up the shield of the institution that tried to eclipse her work, or Cardinal McIntyre, who was willing to drive the healthiest of his flock off the grazing lands he preserved for the institution that, tragically, has since suffered the devastation visited on the clerical culture whose hidden unhealthiness he never understood or ignored?

[Eugene Cullen Kennedy is emeritus professor of psychology at Loyola University, Chicago.]

God bless Cardinal Cody. A

God bless Cardinal Cody. A good man maligned by his enemies because he chose to stand up against the forces of modernization and secularism that were attacking the Church in his day. In my breviary I have one of Cardinal Cody's holy cards from his installation as Archbishop of Chicago. It reminds me daily to pray for him.

CWG you spoke truly when you

CWG you spoke truly when you said Cardinal Cody stood against modernization, but this is only partially true. Modernization, in his eyes, was good if it didn't cost much and it mainly appeared in the guise of the tangible and in the form of bricks/mortar. Being "maligned" happens to public figures. It comes with the territory. However one problem was that Cardinal Cody contributed to the atmosphere with a siege attitude (much like some US and European prelates today). With difficulty, most Chicago priests gave him respect even though, as one chancery official told me, "With the Cardinal, whoever gets to him last prevails." He had a long term plan, but it wasn't for the People of God in Chicago except that they were to be the tool for his more personal plans.

True. Cardinal Cody did

True. Cardinal Cody did indeed embrace some forms of modernization. It can never be forgotten that the hideous "renovation" of Holy Name Cathedral, once a spectacular Catholic cathedral, now a white-washed, iconoclastic cavern, this sin against beauty, art, culture, history, liturgy, God and man, was his responsibility and done under his watch.

I've always felt a sympathy for Cardinal Cody. I see him as a prelate of the "old school" if you will, being confronted by reform in all corners. Some prelates were able to function in that situation and minimize the chaos that reigned in the years and first couple of decades following the Council (Cardinal Carberry in St. Louis, for example). Some prelates embraced the chaos and used it to further their own agenda for stripping Catholicism from the Church (Archbishop Hallinan of Atlanta, for example). Cardinal Cody, I believe, did what he could to keep control over a rowdy clergy, while at the same time trying to bring what was best of the Council to Chicago (except in the case of Holy Name Cathedral, then he brought all that was worst) while trying to maintain some control, some semblance of Catholicity. But, he did not have the temperament for that for long.

I see him as a person who was sincerely trying to do his best in an out-of-control situation. His response to this situation was not perfect, but I cannot fault him for trying. It's possible that not even Cardinal Mundelein, were he to have lived in that post-Conciliar age, would have been able to do much better than Cody did.

I agree with you in

I agree with you in principle. I think the telling phrases are: "keep control overe a rowdy clergy," and "trying to maintain some control [over Catholicism, at least in Chicago]. While I think he is certainly in heaven, having done his best - all that is required of any of us - I think he missed the boat in trusting in his own efforts to "control" things and not trusting in the Holy Spirit, who is the only one really in control anyway.

GOD'S CANDLES

GOD'S CANDLES .....Thanks, Gene, for that encouraging article about two more Chicago martyrs who witnessed faithfully and fully the true Gospel message under oppressive circumstances. Marty and Anita lit their candles brightly, rather than hiding them under bushels, as too many have done and still seem to do. It must be something in the Chicago drinking water: Marty, Anita, Andrew Geeley, Patsy Crowley, you and so many more staunch Chicago witnesses to the Gospels, notwithstanding unrelenting hierarchical brutality.

In the mid-1970's I had unforgettable professional experiences of dealing with separate legal matters involving Cody and MacIntyre. You are too charitable in your recollections of them.

Unfortunately, the lust for power so evident in Cody's and MacIntyre's coercive episcopal style remains alive and well among the current US puppet bishops and their Roman clique puppet masters.

The witness and example of these Chicago Catholics are still percolating in the Chicago water coolers. Please note the NCR comment to Chicago's Bob McClory's excellent recent NCR article, "Who made the decisions for the Church through the years?", under the comment heading "RCC--MIGHT OR RIGHT?", accessible by clicking on at

http://ncronline.org/blogs/ncr-today/who-made-decisions-church-through-y... .

For more information on indications of US bishops' current lust for power, please note the NCR comment under the comment heading entitled,"MOVERS & SHAKERS?", accessible by clicking on at

http://ncronline.org/news/us-capuchins-punch-above-their-weight .

Mr. Slevin ... Can't believe

Mr. Slevin ... Can't believe that you included the egotistical, mean, vindictive, self-centered and self-promoting Andrew Greeley to the pantheon of Chicago saints such as Marty, Gene Kennedy, Patty Crowley, Gerry Sloyan, Jack Egan, etc., etc. You obviously never had personal dealings with the man.

ANDREW GREELEY ... Fred,

ANDREW GREELEY ... Fred, I met Andrew briefly and pleasantly once, but read many of his non-fiction works, which in my view were often unique and valuable to the cause of Church reform. I was alluding in my comment to my understanding of the difficult treatment Greeley received from Cody, whom I only dealt with through his very aggressive lawyers. I never met any of the others mentioned above, and give you the benefit of the doubt about Greeley. Thanks for reading my comment so closely.

Good article, but bad

Good article, but bad metaphor and exegesis. Adam and Eve are portrayed in scripture and tradition as symbols of foolish disobedience, not new-found freedom, and -- at least in Catholic theology, left us all to pay the tab for their foolishness. Bad exegesis is typical of the pre-Vatican II era, not its reforms.

That may still be the story

That may still be the story you want to hold on to, but my take has become: God gave Adam and Eve the chance to stay as children or leave Eden and take responsibility and THINK for themselves. I am glad with this choice. God gave me a brain and Adam and Eve gave me a chance to use this brain, not to be a child and just follow some one else's ways.

This is good pagan theology.

This is good pagan theology. Neither Judaism nor Christianity accept this interpretation.

Nope. It's ----adult----

Nope.

It's ----adult---- theology.

My love for your work has

My love for your work has grown greatly because of your defense of the needs of all catholics being the most important message for the church to address .MY LIFE and the lives of my family are inspired by this hope of change from greed at the top and consern for the needs of people in system .We as a group need to look again at the what we stand for as catholics in todays world . Respectfully, r. musser

I believe as r. musser

I believe as r. musser states. You have been a light in the darkness for me all these many decades. Thank you for keeping hope alive by telling the facts and the truths of matters ecclesiastical.

"By their fruits you shall

"By their fruits you shall know them"

Both men were blinded by power and the dazzle
of their status as hierarchy who enjoyed absolute
power. Both failed to show Christ's loving compassion for his followers.

Im sorry the author was

Im sorry the author was misteated by cardinal Cody. This explains alot of his bitterness and even hatred.

I think the bitterness and

I think the bitterness and hatred run deeper than his relationship with Cody. I think it's self-hatred projected onto everyone who doesn't agree with him.

Mona Fuller, I cannot read

Mona Fuller, I cannot read any bitterness definitely no hate. There are only facts which you obviously ressent being made public. So you have to victimize the the victim. That is a common practice among those Catholics, who cannot face the truth. Do you consider this Christian?

I enjoyed your article and

I enjoyed your article and agree with it. However, I an a bit confused by your stating that Marty Crowley tried to get you fired from Loyola University. Were you refering to Cody? If it was Crowley, could you explain the circumstances.

I, also, was confused by the

I, also, was confused by the parenthetical remark. It didn't seem likely that the man being defended/praised (Crowley) would have tried to have the author removed from office and yet that is how the sentence flowed.

I never knew McIntyre, but I

I never knew McIntyre, but I knew Cody well. He could keep 3 or 4 psychologists busy full time with his paranoia, his suspicions, and his general craziness. Most of the priests who worked most closely to him left the ministry discouraged and bitter. They saw what he did to priests. The only priests Cody had a genuine affection for were graduates of Guest House. He had a soft spot in his cold heart for alcoholic priests. That may be his only redeeming quality.

I was a Chicago priest during

I was a Chicago priest during the Cody era. Still now, after 40 years,it is hard to describe the enmity that existed between the cardinal and large numbers of his clergy. It was a scandal in the true theological sense of the word, although even worse lay ahead. Suffice it to say Gene Kennedy's description of Cody could easily have been far more toxic, and it would all have been true. It took the saintly Cardinal Bernadine to bring grace and healing back to the church in Chicago.

Gene, I was your student at Loyola. Your teaching went far beyond the dry textbooks in psychology that were par for the course. You taught us to RESPECT people as the absolute prerequisite for anyone going into the healing professions. It was an awakening and you were the prophet in our midst. So, keep it up and remember the prophets of the OT were not nice, but then neither were the peope.

Denis Quinlan

When is the hierarchy going

When is the hierarchy going to change? It's so disheartening to see that the Bishop of KCMO could be indicted for failing to keep a pedophile priest away from kids. According to the NY Times, this priest had pornographic photos of children on his computer.

And in the diocese were I grew up, there are not nearly enough priests to say Mass on Sunday. In my little hometown, which has been struggling for ages, now has one priest left, who covers I don't know how many parishes in the county. Solution? Priests have to be rented from St. Louis at $500 per weekend to come and say Mass...

This is not exactly what wrote about in relation to the bishops, but it does point to poor "management of resources."

I read the "he" in the remark

I read the "he" in the remark in parenthesis as referring to Card. Cody who tried to have the president of Loyola fire Kennedy! The context would support this!

I think the "he " refers to

I think the "he " refers to the Cardinal 's trying to get Kennedy fired .

Post new comment

NCR Comment code:

  1. Be respectful. Do not attack the writer. Take on the idea, not the messenger.
  2. Use appropriate language. Avoid vulgarities and slurs.
  3. Keep to the point. Deliberate digressions don't aid the discussion.

For more detailed guidelines, visit our User Guidelines page.

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
(if you have one; if not, leave this blank)
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <font> <swf> <swf list>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You may use <swf file="song.mp3"> to display Flash files inline

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This is to prove you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.