Top 10 under-covered Vatican stories (plus a bonus feature)

By now, it's an "All Things Catholic" tradition to run down the top under-covered Vatican stories of the year. The idea is not to flag the year's most celebrated events or personalities, because plenty of other news agencies do that. Rather, I try to lift up storylines that otherwise flew below radar but that were actually fairly important.

If I were compiling a list of the biggest Vatican stories of the year, for instance, the beatification of Pope John Paul II on May 1 would probably be near the top. Yet it doesn't make the cut as an "under-covered" event, because it's hard to believe anybody who picked up a newspaper in May 2011, or who watched TV that day, could have missed it. Similarly, a document from the Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace on reform of the international economy, as well as the Vatican's diplomatic spat with Ireland, both were important stories, but they were hardly overlooked.

Conversely, if this were a list of "over-covered" stories, probably the No. 1 entry would be the Vatican's on-again, off-again reconciliation with the traditionalist Society of St. Pius X. Aside from the fact that we've been down this road before -- enticed by breathless reports of a deal, only to watch it unravel -- the group's sociological footprint doesn't justify the attention. We're talking about less than one-tenth of 1 percent of the global Catholic population, yet their negotiations with Rome are sometimes covered as if it's Roosevelt and Stalin at Yalta.

Instead, what follows is a run-down of 10 stories during 2011 that didn't have much echo, especially in the States, but which tell us something significant. In other words, this is the kind of stuff that armchair vaticanisti everywhere need to know.

By the way, be sure to read on to the end for a bonus feature on the year's top "non-story."

10. Scola to Milan

Cardinal Angelo Scola, 70, was already in the top tier of papal candidates before his June 28 appointment as the new Archbishop of Milan, but that move certainly put a slammer on his status. During the 20th century, two popes were elected from Milan, Pius XI and Paul VI, and several other archbishops of Milan were considered formidable runners. Scola comes off as an extroverted, optimistic, Italian-speaking version of Benedict XVI -- a ferocious defender of Catholic identity, but someone who likes to put the accent on what the church is for rather than what it's against. As a footnote, the appointment also confirms that Communion and Liberation is Benedict XVI's favorite movement. Scola has lifetime ties to the ciellini and is an intellectual disciple of its founder, the late Monsignor Luigi Giussani.

Subscribe to NCR

Want to read more about important issues in the life of the Church? A subscription to NCR will keep you up to date and informed.

Subscribe now!

9. Courtyard of the Gentiles

Although it didn't have much traction in the English-language press, the March 24-25 "Courtyard of the Gentiles" event in Paris was a major hit in the Francophone world. Organized by the Vatican's Pontifical Council for Culture, under hyper-erudite Italian Cardinal Gianfranco Ravasi, and co-sponsored by UNESCO, l'Institut de France and the Sorbonne, the gathering brought Christians and secularists into serious dialogue. One sign of success is that a celebrated French agnostic philosopher, Jean Luc Ferry, was so impressed that he requested an urgent meeting with Ravasi to propose that the two collaborate on a book on the Gospel of John. The Paris gathering was the first of what Ravasi conceives as a series of "Courtyard of the Gentiles" events in various parts of the world, intended to demonstrate that religion and secularism need not be enemies.

8. Assisi

Understandably, Benedict XVI's Oct. 27 gathering of 300 religious leaders in the birthplace of St. Francis didn't draw anything like the interest that surrounded Pope John Paul II's first inter-religious summit in 1986. (For that matter, John Paul's own follow-up gatherings in Assisi, in 1993 and again in 2002, didn't generate the same buzz.) Yet Benedict's choice to mark the 25th anniversary of John Paul's historic event with an interreligious summit of his own was arguably just as important as the original because of what it symbolizes: That convening the religious leaders of the world on behalf of peace was not simply a personal whim of John Paul II. Instead, it's become part of the job description of the papacy, something future popes will be expected to repeat. Given Benedict's reputation as a guardian of Catholic identity, it's also significant that he explicitly endorsed interreligious dialogue, and acknowledged "great shame" for occasions when violence has been committed in the name of Christian faith.

7. The Benin Trip

In the absence of a new flap over condoms and AIDS in Africa, Benedict XVI's Nov. 18-20 trip to Benin wasn't a media sensation. Yet popes vote with their feet, meaning that their pastoral and geopolitical priorities are often revealed by where they choose to travel. This was Benedict's second trip to Africa, making it his second most-visited continent after Europe. While in Benin, Benedict unveiled a document containing conclusions from a 2009 Synod of Bishops for Africa, representing a papal game plan for the continent where Catholicism grew by almost 7,000 percent during the 20th century. Benedict endorsed the socio-political agenda of African Catholicism, especially the struggle against corruption, and challenged the bishops to get their own house in order in terms of accountability, transparency and good government. He also extended his outreach to Islam, calling on the church "in every situation, to persist in esteem for Muslims." A telling moment came at Benin's Presidential Palace, where Chancellor Koubourath Osseni, a Muslim woman, hailed Benedict XVI as "an authentic friend of Africa."

6. Viganò to the States

The Oct. 19 appointment of Italian Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò as the new papal nuncio, or ambassador, to the United States has both a negative and a positive significance. During his run in the government of the Vatican city-state, Viganò carved out a reputation as an effective financial reformer, ramming through streamlined accounting procedures among the Vatican's notoriously independent little fiefdoms. His exile from Rome, as a result of some rather nasty office politics, arguably illustrates what some observers call a "governance gap" under Benedict XVI -- good intentions that sometimes aren't matched by astute administrative choices, which in this case might have meant allowing Viganò to finish what he started. Yet the fact that he's now in the United States means that Viganò is positioned to help the American bishops move the ball on good money management at a time when some observers worry that financial scandals could become the second round of the sexual abuse crisis in terms of a chronic source of turmoil.

5. Tagle to Manila

Like Milan in Italy, Manila in the Philippines is another one of those mega-dioceses whose leader automatically becomes a global point of reference, and usually draws at least a look as a papal contender. That alone would make the Oct. 13 appointment of Archbishop Luis Antonio Tagle, 54, an important move. Yet the choice is revealing for other reasons too, not least that Tagle flies in the face of conventional stereotypes about the type of leader who usually prospers on Benedict's watch. Tagle is a theological and political moderate, associated with a controversial history of the Second Vatican Council (1962-65) whose progressive interpretation Benedict has spent much of his career contesting. Yet Tagle is also known as a talented theologian, a remarkably un-clerical personality, a good listener and someone utterly uninterested in building ecclesial empires -- in other words, not unlike the reputation of Joseph Ratzinger prior to his election to the papacy. In any event, at the tender age of 54, Tagle is positioned to be a major face and voice for Asian Catholicism for a long time.

4. Benedict's four-volume tour de force

Benedict XVI is a teaching pope, a point that's been crystal clear during his 22 foreign trips. By now, papal observers know that the peak moment of every trip is likely to come during a speech to the "world of culture" that usually includes political, intellectual and spiritual dignitaries. These speeches play to terrific reviews, even among those least inclined to sympathy for what Benedict represents. This year brought another case in point in the form of Benedict's Sept. 22 speech to the Bundestag in Berlin. The role of religious groups in a democracy, the pope suggested, is not to "propose a revealed law to the state and to society," but rather to hold up "nature and reason" as reliable sources for moral choices -- including, he stressed, respect for pluralism and diversity. Benedict even threw in a plug for the environmental movement, calling it "a cry for fresh air," a realization that nature contains a moral compass. Der Spiegel called the speech "courageous" and "brilliant," while the left-wing London Guardian encouraged secular greens to see past stereotypes of the pope as "a prissy and repressed German professor." Bundled with earlier speeches in Regensburg in 2006, the Collège des Bernardins in Paris in 2008, and Westminster Hall in London in 2010, the Bundestag address completes a four-volume tour de force of papal reflection on faith, reason and democracy.

3. The 'Pope of Agnostics'

Improbably enough, the constituency that felt the most love from Benedict XVI during 2011 was the secular agnostic crowd. Probably the biggest headline from his September trip to Germany was Benedict's praise for "agnostics who ... suffer because of our sins and are desirous of a pure heart." Such folk, the pontiff said, are actually "closer to the Kingdom of God than 'routine' believers who only see the apparatus of the church without their hearts being touched by faith." Likewise, Benedict's signal innovation during the Assisi gathering was his decision to invite not just spiritual leaders but also agnostics. In his speech that day, Benedict said genuine agnostics are "inwardly making their way towards [God], inasmuch as they seek truth and goodness," and even thanked them because they "challenge the followers of religions not to consider God as their own property, as if he belonged to them, in such a way that they feel vindicated in using force against others." Who would have predicted that a pontiff who was supposed to be "God's Rottweiler," the ultimate cultural warrior, would turn out to be the "Pope of Agnostics"?

2. The crucifix case

In a stunning and utterly unexpected development, the European Court of Human Rights in March reversed its own 2009 ruling and upheld Italy's right to display crucifixes in its public school classrooms. The ruling means that public expressions of religious belief have been found not to conflict with European standards of human rights and freedom of conscience. Although it may not have burned up airwaves in the States, the story has significance far beyond the borders of Europe. Vis-à-vis what Christian tradition talks about as "the world," there have always been two basic schools of thought. One is an "open door" policy, emphasizing dialogue with the world, presuming its goodwill and meeting it halfway. The other is a "fortress" instinct, seeing the world as fundamentally hostile and seeking a more inward-looking church capable of staying true to itself. The ruling by the Court of Human Rights provided a powerful boost for the "open door" approach, suggesting that detente with secularism may be possible after all. The victory also generated fresh ecumenical and interfaith momentum, as it drew support from a cross-section of Christian denominations as well as European Muslims and Jews.

As a footnote, if I were proposing candidates for top religion newsmakers of the year, I would nominate the lawyer who won the crucifix case -- a New York-based expert on European constitutional law and Orthodox Jew named Joseph Weiler. The sight of Weiler standing in the well of the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights in his kippah, passionately defending Italy's right to keep the crucifix on the wall, has got to rank among the more remarkable bits of interfaith imagery of the year. Weiler also spent much of 2011 working on a new book on the trial of Jesus, which promises to be a major cause célèbre in Catholic/Jewish relations. Among other bombshells, he'll try to persuade fellow Jews that their efforts over 2,000 years to reject the charge of deicide have been misplaced. In a sense that Weiler carefully unpacks, he believes "the Jews" did indeed put Jesus to death, and they were doing exactly what the Lord expected. (His aim is to offer a reading of the trial that renders both Jewish and Christian responses consistent with Scripture -- a project, he readily admits, destined to stir fierce reactions on both sides.)

1. The global war on Christians

2011 opened with the bombing of a Christian church in Alexandria, Egypt, on Jan. 1, which left 23 people dead, and it closed with Christmas Day attacks on three Christian churches in Nigeria, including a Catholic parish where at least 27 people died. In between were numerous other assaults on Christians, including the Oct. 9 "Maspero Massacre" in Cairo, where the Egyptian army opened fire on unarmed Coptic protestors, killing 27 people and injuring hundreds of others. (Adding insult to injury, the state-controlled media in Egypt briefly tried to blame the Copts for the violence, but that effort quickly collapsed in the face of eye-witness testimony.)

Although these episodes were widely reported as they occurred, they were generally interpreted as localized and isolated events, or as part of another narrative -- the aftermath of the Arab Spring in Egypt, or inter-ethnic and sectarian tensions in Nigeria. Yet taken together, what emerges from these atrocities is a picture of a global war on Christians. Today, Christians are by far the most persecuted religious group on the planet; according to the secular Institute for Human Rights, based in Germany, fully 80 percent of all acts of religious intolerance today are directed at Christians. The Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe estimates that about 200 million Christians now suffer discrimination, harassment and outright violence.

The global war on Christians is also a Vatican story, because the events of 2011 cemented religious freedom as the Vatican's signal social and political concern in the early 21st century. That shift has consequences across the board, including in ecumenical relations. Cardinal Kurt Koch, the Vatican's top official for relations with other Christians, gave a little-noticed but important speech in September proposing "ecumenism of the martyrs" as the new foundation of Christian unity, given that all churches these days are witnessing the rise of a new generation of martyrs.

Sadly, it's a safe bet that the global war on Christians will remain a top storyline in 2012. Whether it continues to be under-covered depends on how thoroughly the rest of the world, perhaps especially those of us in the West, wakes up.

* * *

Bonus feature: top Vatican non-story of 2011

Sometimes a year is remarkable not just for what happened, but for what didn't. In that spirit, I propose "the dog that didn't bark" as the year's top Vatican non-story, by which I mean that 2011 was largely spared the massive public relations debacles which have marred other years of Benedict's papacy.

Consider this brief stroll down memory lane:

    2006 saw massive Islamic protest over a September speech by Benedict XVI in Regensburg, Germany, that appeared to link Muhammad with violence. The blowback included the firebombing of churches in the West Bank and Gaza Strip, and the shooting death of a nun in Somalia.

  • Early 2007 brought the resignation in disgrace of Benedict's choice as the new Archbishop of Warsaw in Poland, following charges that he had been a Communist collaborator. Later in the year, Benedict stirred protest in Brazil by appearing to suggest that the natives of the New World should be grateful for European colonialism and oppression.
  • 2008 brought a crisis in Jewish/Catholic relations over use of the traditional Latin prayer on Good Friday for the conversion of the Jews. Benedict eventually amended the prayer in response to Jewish sensitivities, but only after a lengthy public debate.
  • 2009 featured a contretemps over the lifting of the excommunications of four traditionalist bishops, including one who's questioned whether the Nazis used gas chambers. It also saw a flap over Benedict's trip to Africa, when the pontiff seemed to suggest that condoms make the AIDS crisis worse.
  • 2010 brought the explosion of the sex abuse crisis in Europe, aggravated by a series of ill-timed and explosive comments from Vatican officials. It also saw the surreal "Boffo case" in Italy, in which the Vatican remained inexplicably silent while national media outlets openly asserted that the Cardinal-Secretary of State, the editor of the Vatican newspaper, and the head of the Vatican security service were all involved in a plot to defame a noted Italian Catholic journalist by suggesting he had harassed a woman in order to carry on a homosexual affair with her fiancé.

Those who have been paying attention realize this is not a complete list, but it's enough to make the point: In previous years, Benedict's Vatican team has occasionally demonstrated a genius for shooting itself in the foot.

Given that history, 2011 was remarkable because the dog of PR meltdowns basically didn't bark.

There was controversy during the past year, of course. Outrage continued to percolate in Ireland over the sex abuse crisis, and a nonprofit legal foundation based in the States announced an appeal to the International Criminal Court seeking to indict the pope and the Vatican over the scandals. Liberal Catholics groused about the new translation of the Roman Missal, and the Vatican's outreach to the traditionalist Society of St. Pius X; conservatives grumbled about the Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace's document on the global economy, especially its support for stronger world governance, including the idea of a global central bank.

Yet to govern is to choose, and inevitably during any 12-month span, the Vatican will make choices that leave somebody unhappy. The striking thing about 2011 is that there was no big-ticket PR miscue that exacerbated these policy debates or that created gratuitous distractions. Benedict XVI did not, for instance, fall into the "condoms trap" during his November trip to Benin, nor was there any new eruption in interfaith relations.

Whether the non-barking dog of 2011 was the result of a new savvy, or simply dumb luck, is perhaps open to debate. Nonetheless, it's the year's top non-story, and one for which Benedict XVI ought to be grateful.

[John L. Allen Jr. is NCR's senior correspondent. His email address is jallen@ncronline.org.]

Unmentioned and maybe

Unmentioned and maybe forgotten was the issue of certain African priests who acted as though the
Catholic nuns were their harem. It fell to other more urgent problems such as massacres but resurged recently in the story of a priest who refused to cooperate with nuns who ran a college and worked in parishes. Power and money were key issues. The courts took the side of the priest.

True and not mentioned, as of

True and not mentioned, as of little consequence, anonymous, the wombs of those vulnerable religious women desecrated, many to live with the shame forever, bringing to mind those forced out of their religious communities who gave birth to their children.

I noticed not one word on the

I noticed not one word on the Vatican Banking scandal...

Maybe it's time to admit that

Maybe it's time to admit that there is very little happening in/coming from the Vatican that is of any interest to the large majority of people - Catholic and otherwise - in the world.

When you concentrate on the

When you concentrate on the call to holiness, there is alot to read from the Holy Father. His words are always edifying and you can feel the presence and know the presence of God.

Because when it comes down to

Because when it comes down to the facts, it was a non-scandal.

Ditto! I also noticed not

Ditto! I also noticed not one word on the burgeoning crisis of the Priest Pedophilia SCANDAL in Holland and Ireland! Sure Ireland has had revelations of Priest Pedophilia for years, and the new Raphoe Diocese Report was just another sickening, criminal report on Priest Pedophiles and the bishops, who covered up for them and transferred them from parish to parish, so they could abuse, rape and sodomize another fresh group of kids, but some mention should have been made of it, just for the purpose of acknowledging the years of suffering of the abused! Also, there wasn't a mention made of one of the leading stories of the year: Ireland removing its ambassador to the Holy See!

OXYMORONIC ALERT? "Rather, I

OXYMORONIC ALERT?
"Rather, I try to lift up storylines that otherwise flew below radar but that were actually fairly important."

It is not an oxymoron. Most

It is not an oxymoron. Most news outlets put more emphasis on sensationalism than significance. Hence, some important stories get ignored, and lots of drivel gets headlines.

John Allen does not mention

John Allen does not mention that Joseph Weiler received no payment for his defence of the crucifix in Italian class rooms, though offered a considerable sum to do so. When praised for his generosity during a lecture he gave in London's Westminster Hall, he responded he had no choice but to act pro bono. "Can you not see the headlines", he explained: "for money this Jew will even defend the cross".

I hope Mr. Allen will advise

I hope Mr. Allen will advise us of the publication of Atty. Weiler's book on the Trial of Jesus.

Apparently an article about this trial by the same author appeared in the June/July 2010 issue of some "Monthly Journal of Religion and Public Life" and I would like to read the full book exegesis.

I believe that John reported

I believe that John reported that statement in an earlier post.

If Joseph Weiler ever writes

If Joseph Weiler ever writes a book expanding of his lecture that included the trial of Jesus,I'd love to read it.

Just finished A People of

Just finished A People of Hope. Great stuff. Ann C. Hall, Ohio Dominican.

How about an update on the

How about an update on the large German "porn" publisher that was found to be owned by the German Bishops (for the past 30 years)>

wow!! now i like this one,

wow!! now i like this one, otherwise who really cares its just another ancient show for the world to see. I never considered them important however whatever floats your boat.

Jophn's articles aree always

Jophn's articles aree always stimulating and thoughtful. I'm excited about the possibilities Cardinal Ravasi and Archbishop Tagle offer to the futurechurch. Scola would be more of the same as a Pope, but the other two offer us a whole new way to be Church. Please God...

What about the 4th

What about the 4th anniversary of bishops resistance on implementing the Motu Proprio Summorum Pontificum?

If we are looking for a bit

If we are looking for a bit of a Vatican stuff-up for 2011, then the warm embrace Robert Mugabe received when he turned up for the beatification of John Paul II might merit mention.

Many objected to Mugabe being there in first place, since the Secretariate of State would have had to make arrangements with Italy to ensure Mugabe's passage, seeing as Italy has a travel ban on Mugabe. Others objected to that man receiving Communion. But to my mind, on these issues one can give the Vatican the benefit of doubt.

The trouble was the warmth of the reception Mugabe was given -- down to a hug by some prelate -- with Mugabe and entourage photographed strutting through a claered St Peter's basilica. That just a few weeks after Mugabe called the Catholic bishops of Zimbabwe liars and agents of the West. In short, the Vatican created an impression that it sides with the brutal Mugabe over the bishops. And that is a pretty bad stuff-up.

Pity it didn't make bigger headlines.

John: Very happy to have read

John: Very happy to have read your column just now because it shows just how out-of-touch our Chicago Cardinal George is with the Pope's thinking. Inj your 4th top under-reported story you write, "The role of religious groups in a democracy, the pope suggested, is not to "propose a revealed law to the state and to society," but rather to hold up "nature and reason" as reliable sources for moral choices -- including, he stressed, respect for pluralism and diversity." If you haven't read today's lead Chicago Tribune editorial, here's the link: http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/opinion/editorials/ct-edit-cardinal-2.... Here's the headline, "The Cardinal's Bizarre Analogy". And here's the first sentence in the editorial which details his analogy: "You don't want the gay liberation movement to morph into something like the Ku Klux Klan, demonstrating in the streets against Catholicism." — Cardinal Francis George, in a Fox Chicago newscast.

Of course, the incongruity of

Of course, the incongruity of the year was on Christmas day with BXVI standing in a gold lame outfit toped with a gold crown and telling us not to look for glitter.

I loved it! If he's going to

I loved it! If he's going to talk about glitter, the least he could have done was to wear his little ermine shawl!

I find it interesting that

I find it interesting that you felt the necessity to denigrate the SSPX in the introduction. I am not an SSPX member, but as a Catholic, I would like to see those half-million souls reunited to the One True Church. Remember that old axiom: Don't throw mud - you are only losing ground!

Yeah, I see what you mean

Yeah, I see what you mean about the satanic ads.

On coverage of the on again

On coverage of the on again off again "negotiations" with the heretical and sectarian Society of Pius X, you write, "the group's sociological footprint doesn't justify the attention. We're talking about less than one-tenth of 1 percent of the global Catholic population, yet their negotiations with Rome are sometimes covered as if it's Roosevelt and Stalin at Yalta..."

These "negotiations" are of vital and ongoing importance to all of us. The miniscule Pius X tail is wagging the 1 billion and more members of the RC dog - re. the latinisation of the English "translation" of the Mass into atrocious English, the refusal to have prayer in public at the so-called "inter-faith" gathering at Assisi (not so much continuing Assisi 1986 as hi-jacking it), the identification of "Catholic identity" with a romantised (and sexually-abused cleansed) version of the European Church of the beginning of the twentieth century (the Church of the French and German Empires?) The extremist Pius X sect has shifted "mainstream" Catholicism sharply to the right.

## It's more accurate to say

## It's more accurate to say that the SSPX stands where the Church stood in 1960; it is the rest of the Church that has changed position. The result is the same, in that the two don't agree. What this means, is a different question - it does not decide which party to the disagreement is in the right: if either is. It is also possible that each is right in part and wrong in part. Be that as it may, they need each other to be healthy.

Thank you for this wonderful

Thank you for this wonderful article.

Might there be some good

Might there be some good reasons why those stories received the attention they deserve? Outside view looking in is different than author's inside view looking out.

Thank you for this, John.

Thank you for this, John. You got 99% right. One miss is your suggestion that the Pope implied that "the natives of the New World should be grateful for European colonialism and oppression". Do you really think he would make such a serious error in the history of the New World? In one speech Pope Benedict did imply that the New World should be grateful for being introduced to Christianity at a time when their religious rituals often comprised adult and child sacrifice. Of course, this did not justify the brutality of the Spanish crown toward the natives.

I think the removal of Bishop

I think the removal of Bishop Morris from his Australian post was the most significant sign of 2011 for the Vatican. When they sent Chaput in to "investigate" and then removed Bishop Morris summarily - they began the brother against brother reaction to dysfunction that will bring down Rome by cementing their irrelevance to the modern world. Practices which stifle thought, discussion, scholarship and reflection are un-Catholic and contradict Christ's teaching and example. I notice that thinking, progressive (ordained, religious and lay) Catholics often believe their particular actions have outsmarted their particular hierarchy. They explain Sr. Elizabeth Johnson, Sr. Louise Akers, Bishop Morris or Fr. Roy Borgious as examples of those who have gone too far or not gone about things in the most clever way. What they don't realize yet, is that anyone of us could be the next victim of the thought police: excommunicated, fired, forced to resign, banned from teaching, forced to sign a confidentiality agreement to get owed salary and benefits...there is no just protection from thought police. There is no recourse to just treatment. It may not yet be too late for transformation but we can't wait and we must care now.
Kathleen

One point of concern: "2009

One point of concern:

"2009 featured... a flap over Benedict's trip to Africa, when the pontiff seemed to suggest that condoms make the AIDS crisis worse."

This comment "seems to suggest" that the Pope didn't intend to make that suggestion, when he clearly did. He said "the distribution of condoms, which even aggravates the problems." Translation "condoms aggravate the AIDS problem." Perhaps there are still some who disagree with the Church's stance on the issue, but the Pope isn't one of them (obviously, he REPRESENTS the Church and her teachings) and it is of no benefit to Benedict XVI to portray him as conceding even a single inch on this moral teaching. If someone disagrees with the Pope, they should say so, but they shouldn't try to misread the Pope's statements to meet their own ideas.

Further, to give credibility to the correct reading of the Pope's comments, read this:
http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/archive/ldn/2009/mar/09031906

Anyway, please try to be consistent and honest about what the Pope actually says. We all agree that the media takes things out of context (some examples of which you even pointed out in this article),but please don't be another part of that problem.

Great column! Very

Great column! Very informative! Thank you!

Will I be attacked if I say I

Will I be attacked if I say I enjoyed and agree with the writer's comments and conclusions?

Peace, Love and Joy to you and Let us Pray.

Interesting. Some other

Interesting. Some other stories little covered, and not mentioned:

16. Opus Dei. Catholic “movements”, who were supposed to be the vanguards of “new evangelization” had a rough year. But they certainly showed that they can learn tricks from one another. First Father Maciel’s Legionnaires learned how to create a cult-like structure from Escriva, with systems to keep lay in non-canonical spiritual bondages, to generate $$$. Then the Legionnaires used strong arm tactics to protect their “trade marked” methods of brain washing, by suing and closing an ex-legionnaire website a few years ago. OD now took this same trick back from LC, and sued a website in Spain for same reasons (Opuslibros). OD also won another law suit: a case was dismissed in France on technicalities, in which a numerary assistant sued for labor exploitation. However this case exposed the non-canonical spiritual exploitative bondage numerary assistants are brain washed to live in. In a separate case, OD lost a lawsuit and was forced to delete personal files of an ex Spanish member. The film, “There Be Dragons”, that Mr Allen predicted would be huge, was a huge, multimillion dollar, financial flop. The half of the film that described the life of the self appointed saint of the ordinary, showed a man that, indeed, was very ordinary. The second half of the film depicted a fictional evil counter part of Escriva. What people missed is that the film director, Mr Joffe, cleverly used this second half to show the “hidden half” of OD. Indeed as the film was released, stories of stolen children in the aftermath of the civil war, by forced adoption by conservative Catholics, including OD members, broke out in the Spanish press. The fictional evil counterpart’s story was in large part about that.

15. The Legionnaires of Christ. Finally the Vatican appointed delegate flexed his tinny muscles and dismissed Fr Garza. He also gave greater autonomy for the non canonical (a la OD) “consecrated” women, but what this “autonomy” means is clear as mud at this point. But not to worry, all is rosy in LC/RC land, according to official sources.

14. The Neocatechumens. The power of money reared its head, as the Vatican went against Catholic teaching on subsidiarity and imposed this 60’s style Spanish right wing hippy movement, complete with a multivolume “secret” catechism written by a narcissistic lay “artist” founder, his paintings, guitar/tambourine songs and non standard liturgy, on poor Japanese Bishops. But the Bishops fought back and brought this scandal to the attention of the world. Unfortunately, the terrible earthquake and tsunami overshadowed this story.

13. Comunione e Liberazione lost influence on Italian corrupt patronage politics, with the resignation of Berluscone. But the Vatican will continue try promoting such “Movements” as they are great gravy trains. They even included a passage from Escriva in the new guide for “spiritual direction”, that we lay don’t need to pray formally anymore (as prescribed by Church Doctors for 2000 years), because now, all we need to do is to follow the self appointed saint of the ordinary instructions, that “everything is prayer”...I guess as long as one follows “Movement’s” prescribed $$$ generating schemes. Fortunately even usually careful journalists, like Sandro Magister took notice, that similar movements are given a too easy pass (hopefully, our dear John Allen, as he grows older, will resist the temptation to play it safe, to go to meetings in fancy hotels with nice dinners, rather than stay on the beat).

12. The death of Kenya’s greenbelt movement and Nobel prize winner, Wangari Maathai. Few people know, that as a Catholic, she tried to emulate nuns that educated her, as a young girl. Few people know that she won one of her major political battles, after being sheltered for weeks in the Cathedral, in Nairobi. She was a pioneer that brought the idea of faith, science and effective grass roots activism in the developing world. But I guess she in not “European” enough to make it on any Catholic lists, right or left. Unfortunately, “liberal white western educated” know it all “activist” like Clinton and Obama usurped her truly heroic efforts to make Kenya more democratic, to now push down the throats of Kenyans the western Anglo elite world view, that killing children is ok (abortion) as a means to promote of what people like the Clintons see as “adult rights”. This is a lesson for the rest of Africa, and the Church: don’t shy away from protecting and promoting people like Maathai. But this is now unlikely, as Caritas, the Catholic Charity arm is now firmly in control of backward looking Vatican appointees, and will be used to promote pet projects of the well connected with services to sell. Hopefully one day, when the Vatican office of promoter of Faith is restored, and there is once again an accountable process of nominating saints, she will be beatified.

11. Further commoditization of “holiness”. The Vatican rightly tried to promote “adult stem cells”, but the effort backfired, as the supposedly “scientific” meeting on the subject was everything a medical/scientific meeting should not be: no accountable peer review, financial connections were not disclosed (why is the Vatican funding a company with close ties to China? How was that decision made? How was scientific merit reviewed, and by whom?). There was no call for abstracts. Basically this meeting gave the appearance of an influence peddling bazaar, to self promote pet projects. So much for “ethics” and scientific accountablilty (but then again, Vatican “bioethics” is now principally in the hands of groups like OD and LC, so no surprises there).

Happy New Year!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ID7o5L3CaRU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mq-ZGktYWWA

I was somewhat disappointed

I was somewhat disappointed with a few things in the article: 1)A most underreported story (I'd place it in the top five somewhere) is the announcement of, manning of & inaugurating a curial New Evangelization dicastery, the instrument of a campaign Benedict has been on since his first day as Pope. 2)The fact that the Benin trip with its "papal game plan" for Africa is #7 rather than among the top seems to me to be a misreading of the importance of the 2009 African Synod and its aftermath. The September German trip rated two mentions (both in the top five). 3)Speaking of Germany calls to mind German-speaking theologians, those from the U.S.A., priests in Germany, Ireland & Australia, laity from all these continents. In each and all of these places (and others) events, movements and connections emerged to call for reclaiming a People-of-God faith. Again, this should have been in the top-five "significant" underreported (ignored?)stories re Vatican relationships (perhaps even #1). Every day the thematic question of a German theological work not yet published in USA takes on new importance: CAN THE CHURCH STILL BE SAVED? (if I recall its title correctly).

As for the "non-story" list referring to papal PR gaffes it seems that in the USA this is moot because Pope Benedict's foot-shooting was replaced in 2011 by the Doctrinal Committee of the USCCB as well as Cardinal Francis George early in the year and very recently.

All this is inside

All this is inside baseball.
Anything of God?
Big boys making big noise with their big toys.

I think that the YouCat

I think that the YouCat affair deserves a mention. And, even more important perhaps, the denunciation of the Vatican in Ireland:

http://insightscoop.typepad.com/2004/2011/04/youcat-and-contraception.html
http://catholicinformation.aquinasandmore.com/2011/08/17/why-we-are-disc...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mo5MXrqbDeA
http://uk.reuters.com/article/2011/11/03/uk-ireland-vatican-idUKTRE7A27G...

As story 1 of 2012 - the re-organisation of US dioceses.

After readings most of the

After readings most of the comments -- Not all, thank goodness, I don't want a session with the psychiatrist -- I cannot but agree strongly with Allen and Benedict on agnostics: Such folk, the pontiff said, are actually "closer to the Kingdom of God than 'routine' believers who only see the apparatus of the church without their hearts being touched by faith." Too many apparatus in the contributions. Take camomilla, fellows

Post new comment

NCR Comment code:

  1. Be respectful. Do not attack the writer. Take on the idea, not the messenger.
  2. Use appropriate language. Avoid vulgarities and slurs.
  3. Keep to the point. Deliberate digressions don't aid the discussion.

For more detailed guidelines, visit our User Guidelines page.

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
(if you have one; if not, leave this blank)
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <font> <swf> <swf list>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You may use <swf file="song.mp3"> to display Flash files inline

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This is to prove you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.