A key to reading Benedict's social encyclical

Printer-friendly versionPrinter-friendly versionSend to friendSend to friendPDF versionPDF version

Also: the Vatican on Galileo, a hidden treasure in Rome, and more

Italians have a wonderful phrase, chiave di lettura, which literally means a "key to reading." It refers to some core idea, or perspective, that can help make sense of a complex mass of material. Since Benedict XVI's long-awaited encyclical on the economy is finally set to appear next Tuesday, it seems a good time to float a possible chiave di lettura for the document, which I can express in one word: synthesis.

Titled Caritas in Veritate (the English title is "Love in Truth,") the encyclical will be presented Tuesday in a Vatican news conference. I'll be on hand for it, as well as for Pope Benedict's meeting with President Barack Obama next Friday.

Though the pope may not spell it out quite this way, much of Caritas in Veritate could well shape up as an attempt to synthesize three of the most persistent -- and, Benedict would doubtless say, artificial -- dichotomies in recent Catholic experience:

  • Personal conversion versus social reform;
  • Pro-life versus peace and justice commitments;
  • Horizontal versus vertical spirituality.

All three points can be understood as partial versions of one "grand dichotomy," that between truth and love.

To be sure, that idea is unlikely to figure in many news headlines on Tuesday, which will probably focus on the pope's policy recommendations, and/or his condemnations of greed. On the blogs, meanwhile, a slugfest will almost certainly erupt over whether the encyclical skews closer to the political right or left. (Its release just three days before President Barack Obama meets Benedict will probably fuel that cycle of spin.)

For those interested in drilling down, however, I suspect "synthesis" will prove a helpful way of pulling the document's strands together.

Inspiration for this chiave di lettura comes from Benedict himself, in a Q&A session two years ago with priests from the dioceses of Belluno-Feltre and Treviso in Italy. On that occasion, Benedict said: "Catholicism, somewhat simplistically, has always been considered the religion of the great 'et et': not of great forms of exclusivism, but of synthesis. The exact meaning of 'Catholic' is 'synthesis'."

Scrutinizing what's already on the record about Caritas in Veritate, it seems this "both/and" spirit is likely to pulsate through the document.

Personal conversion and social change

Perhaps no single idea is likely to loom larger than the insistence that a real fix to the global economic crisis -- which, of course, has to involve looking at structural matters such as trading relationships, tax policies, lending practices, and so on -- must first be rooted in personal conversion. Unless individual human beings act ethically, and see themselves as accountable to the common good, any system can be hijacked, subverted and corrupted, however noble its design.

A few days ago, unofficial extracts from Caritas in Veritate were published in the Italian press, and this idea figured heavily in those passages.

"Development is impossible without just human beings, without economic and political leaders who live the appeal to the common good strongly in their own consciences," the pope was reported to have written.

We don't need leaks, however, to get a sense of what's on the way, because most of Benedict's public remarks during the past week have seemed like a preview of the encyclical.

In a homily on Monday, Benedict reflected on the link between the personal and the social: "Lack of care for the soul, the misery of the interior person, not only destroys the individual, but it threatens the destiny of humanity in its entirety. … Without healing of the soul, without healing of the person from within, there can be no salvation for humanity."

The day before, during a vespers service at the Basilica of St. Paul Outside the Walls to mark the close of the "Pauline Year," Benedict offered another version of the same point: "Paul tells us [that] the world cannot be renewed without new human beings," he said. "Only if there are new human beings will there be a new world, a renewed and better world."

To some extent, this emphasis on holding the personal and the social together reprises a key idea from Benedict's first encyclical, Deus Caritas Est, in which he argued that programs of social justice can never eliminate the need for individual acts of charity. In a sense, Caritas in Veritate is likely to apply the same insight to the economy: There's no economic justice without individual morality -- rooted, ultimately, in truth.

Pro-Life and Peace-and-Justice Commitments

As he has elsewhere, Benedict is likely to reject any attempt to pick and choose among the church's social teachings, particularly when it comes to the wearily familiar tendency among Catholics to splinter into pro-life and peace-and-justice camps.

During the Sunday vespers service at St. Paul Outside the Walls, Benedict delivered a homily which called to mind his famous "dictatorship of relativism" speech on the cusp of the conclave that elected him to the papacy. Just as four years ago, Benedict on Monday was reflecting on Paul's letter to the Ephesians, urging Christians not to be like infants "tossed by waves and swept along by every wind of teaching arising from human trickery."

In that spirit, Benedict said that spiritual renewal requires "non-conformism," an unwillingness to "submit oneself to the scheme of the current epoch." Benedict recalled Paul's insistence upon an "adult faith," mocking the use of that phrase to justify dissent from official Catholic doctrine.

"The phrase 'an adult faith' in recent decades has become a diffuse slogan," the pope said. "It's often used to mean someone who no longer listens to the church and its pastors, but who chooses autonomously what to believe and not to believe -- a 'do-it-yourself' faith. This is then presented as the 'courage' to express oneself against the magisterium of the church."

"In reality, however, courage isn't needed for that, because one can always be sure of public applause," the pope said. "What takes courage is adhering to the faith of the church, even if it contradicts the 'scheme' of the contemporary world."

Benedict specifically highlighted opposition to abortion and gay marriage.

"Part of an adult faith, for example, is a commitment to the inviolability of human life from its first moment, radically opposing the principle of violence, precisely in the defense of the most defenseless of human creatures," the pope said. "Part of an adult faith is also recognizing marriage between a man and a woman for life as part of the design of the Creator, newly reestablished by Christ."

The leaked portions of Caritas in Veritate suggest that Benedict will come back to this point in the encyclical.

"Openness to life is at the heart of true development," the pope writes, according to the reports. "If personal and social sensibility for welcoming new life is lost, then other forms of welcome which are also useful for social life dry up."

Horizontal and Vertical Spirituality

A third recurrent tension in Catholic life runs between a primarily "vertical" spirituality, focused on the believer's personal faith life and relationship with God, and one that's more "horizontal," emphasizing the community of the faithful and broader engagement with the world. This tension sometimes ends up putting missionary efforts and social justice activism at odds, as if preaching the gospel were a distraction from building a better world.

On other occasions when Benedict XVI has touched upon social themes, he's argued that not only can vertical and horizontal spiritualities be reconciled, but that the former is a sine qua non for the latter. There can be no just world, the pontiff has insisted, without Christ, who is the source of justice.

That theme came across most clearly during Benedict's 2007 trip to Brazil, when he reflected at length on the idea of Latin America as a "continent of hope."

"Not a political ideology, not a social movement, not an economic system," the pope said, "but faith in the God who is love -- who took flesh, died and rose in Jesus Christ -- is the authentic basis for this hope."

Benedict acknowledged that a vertical spirituality "must not serve as an excuse for avoiding the historical reality in which the church lives as she shares the joys and hopes, the grief and anguish of the people of our time, especially those who are poor and afflicted." Yet Benedict insisted that social solidarity likewise must not dislodge proclamation of Christ, participation in the sacraments, and the promotion of holiness.

According to the extracts making the rounds, Benedict will make this point too in Caritas in Veritate.

The truth and love of Christ, the pope is reported to have written, is "the principal resource at the service of the true development of every single person and of all humanity."

* * *

Two footnotes.

First, the line-up for Tuesday's press conference includes Italian Cardinal Renato Martino, president of the Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace; German Cardinal Paul Cordes, president of Cor Unum, the Vatican office that oversees charitable activity; Bishop Giampaolo Crepaldi, the number two official at Justice and Peace; and Stefano Zamagni, a professor of political economy at the University of Bologna, who was consulted in the preparation of the encyclical. Cordes was perhaps the key Vatican influence on Benedict XVI's first encyclical, Deus Caritas Est, and both he and Martino were involved in Caritas in Veritate. Notably, American Cardinal William Levada of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, who was present at the press conference for Deus Caritas Est, won't be on hand this time -- suggesting that even less than Benedict's first encyclical, this one is not seen by the Vatican as treating strictly doctrinal questions.

Second, it would be silly to suggest that the Vatican somehow timed the release of Caritas in Veritate to coincide with Obama's visit (which will probably not stop someone from doing it), but even so the coincidence does lend the document a particular relevance. On the subject of that July 10 encounter, one thing seems clear: To say that Obama is going out of his way to see the pope is, in this case, not just a political figure of speech. He'll arrive at the Apostolic Palace directly from the Abruzzo region of Italy, where earlier in the day he'll wrap up a G8 summit and also hold bilateral meetings with other leaders. After his session with the pope, Obama will be wheels up within moments -- en route to Ghana for a two-day visit, his first trip to sub-Saharan Africa since his election.

The White House's determination to put a meeting with Benedict on Obama's calendar on such a complicated day, even before the new U.S. ambassador to the Holy See has been confirmed, is striking. Likewise, the Vatican generally schedules meetings with heads of state in the late morning, so its willingness to accommodate Obama's arrival in the afternoon can also be read as a sign of eagerness.

In addition to seeing the pontiff, Obama is also expected to meet briefly with Cardinal Tarcisio Bertone, the Vatican's Secretary of State, and other senior Vatican diplomats. Those meetings are closed, though typically the Vatican issues a brief statement afterwards.

* * *

The big Vatican stories in early July are the encyclical and the meeting with Obama, which means that everything else tends to fall through the cracks.

Under other circumstances, a press conference on Thursday with Bishop Sergio Pagano to present a new edition of a book on Galileo might have been a hot ticket. Not only is Galileo interesting, but Pagano, the prefect of the Vatican's Secret Archives, is also the point man on the release of documents from the era of Pope Pius XII, the wartime pontiff whose alleged silence during the Holocaust remains an explosive subject in Catholic-Jewish relations and elsewhere.

As things stand, however, "electric" would not quite be the word to describe the event. In fact, it took the vice-director of the Holy See Press Office, Passionist Fr. Ciro Benedettini, to even pop a question about Pius XII, when it become clear that the handful of gathered journalists weren't going to do so.

That said, the news conference still produced a number of insights worth recording -- in part because Pagano is always open and direct, not to mention a world-class scholar who knows his stuff.

He was on hand to present a new edition of Vatican Documents of the Trial of Galileo Galilei (1611-1741), the 1984 volume which Pagano edited at the request of the late Pope John Paul II. Pagano said the new edition is the "most complete" and "most careful" collection of material from Galileo's case, including 20 new documents discovered after 1984. (The new material, however, is not exactly a blockbuster; several of the texts are versions of a Vatican edict refusing to grant permission to read Galileo's books. (For the record, Pagano said the requests came from Dominicans.)

The volume has a 208-page introduction by Pagano which steps through the events between 1611 (when Cardinal Robert Bellarmine first asked Jesuit scientists to look into Galileo's scientific theories) and 1633 (when Galileo was imprisoned for two weeks in an apartment in the headquarters of the Inquisition, today the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, while being interrogated. He was eventually sentenced to prison, but allowed to live under house arrest.)

Pagano stressed that his introduction is a work of history, not apologetics, because "the best defense of the church is always the truth." He went on to say that he's not fond of "empty and useless" attempts to paper over the Galileo case. He pointed to a recent book in Germany, which asserted that Galileo was not targeted by the church for his scientific views but rather as a heretic (because he had allegedly denied the omnipotence of God).

Pagano called that claim a "pure fantasy," for which "there's not a shred of evidence" in the documentary record.

Commenting on Galileo himself, Pagano said that the scientist saw himself as a "good and faithful Catholic." Pagano pointed out, for example, that while he was under house arrest, the Netherlands wanted to present him with a fairly valuable gift. Because Holland was a Protestant nation, however, Galileo refused to see the ambassador or to take the gift -- a decision, Pagano said, that was well-received in Rome.

Introducing Pagano, Benedettini had called the Galileo case a "painful chapter for the church." Later on I asked Pagano if he agreed, and if so, what we ought to learn from it.

"Not only was it painful for the church as a whole," Pagano replied, but also "for the people of the church." For example, Pagano said that while some Jesuits at the Roman College had it out for Galileo, probably because of jealousy, other Jesuits were "certainly on his side, but they remained silent" -- out of fear, Pagano said, of the Holy Office.

In terms of what we ought to learn, Pagano said the basic point is to be "very careful" about drawing conclusions about science on the basis of scripture and tradition, without first being sure those points of reference have been correctly understood and interpreted.

That, Pagano suggested, is a point with contemporary relevance.

"When I look at some of what's being said today about stem cells, for example, or about genetics, I sometimes have the impression that it's burdened with the same preconceptions that happened with Galileo."

As for Pius XII, Pagano confirmed what the Vatican has already announced, which is that it's likely to take five to six years to prepare all the remaining material for release, and then it will the pope's decision when to open it up. Pagano called Pius XII "a great pope," and said the Secret Archives a preparing a volume documenting the pope's extensive charitable activity during World War II -- a volume, he said, which will contain "some pleasant surprises."

* * *

On Wednesday I was a guest for lunch at the Lay Centre, a residence for lay students from around the world, Catholic and non-Catholic, who are studying at one of Rome's pontifical universities. It also functions as a center for various meetings, courses, and presentations throughout the year. This week it was hosting a seminar for lay ecclesial ministers from the States, accompanied by Rick McCord, executive director of the U.S. bishop's department for Laity, Marriage, Family Life and Youth.

I gave a presentation focusing among other things on navigating the "cultural gap" between America and Rome.

I'll repeat here a point I made on Wednesday: the Lay Center is one of the "hidden treasures" of Rome. Run by an American lay woman named Donna Orsuto, a professor of spirituality at the Gregorian University, the Lay Centre has no sponsorship by a diocese or a religious order, and thus operates on a shoestring budget. Nonetheless, it manages to carve out a unique space for dialogue and formation for laity in what is still very much a clerical environment.

The Lay Centre is currently moving to a new location, which should allow it some room to breathe. Its Web site can be found here: www.laycentre.org. Anyone looking for a good cause in Rome, worthy of their support, would do well to check it out.

* * *

On Monday this week, I was in St. Peter's Basilica to watch Pope Benedict XVI bestow the pallium, a band of woolen cloth that symbolizes both the authority of an archbishop and his bond with the pope, upon 34 new archbishops named during the past year, including five Americans:

  • Gregory Aymond of New Orleans;
  • Robert Carlson of St. Louis;
  • Timothy Dolan of New York;
  • George Lucas of Omaha;
  • Allen Vigneron of Detroit.

I've already written a fair bit about the pallium, both on-line and in print, so here I'll simply append two footnotes.

First, the North American College, the residence for American seminarians studying in Rome, does a marvelous job of making Americans who come over for festivities such as the pallium feel at home. After the ceremony on Monday, they hosted a large reception for the various delegations who accompanied their archbishops, as well as for other Americans in Rome. The food and drink were plentiful, and the seminarians and faculty, as always, were infinitely gracious, even though we were essentially ruining their day off. (June 29, the feast of Sts. Peter and Paul, is a holiday in Italy). I repeatedly found myself muttering "God bless the United States," if for no other reason than that the NAC, unlike most ecclesiastical facilities in Rome, has great air conditioning. (By way of contrast, I was in the Sala Regia inside the Apostolic Palace on Tuesday for an event, and nearly got tennis elbow fanning myself.)

Second, if they gave an award for best quip during the pallium event, this year's prize would probably have to go to Vigneron. He's got an intellectual's wit, which didn't happen by accident; he holds a doctorate in philosophy from The Catholic University, where his dissertation was on Edmund Husserl, the father of phenomenology.

On Monday, the five American archbishops held a brief session with reporters before scuttling off to the NAC reception, where Dolan kicked things off by declaring he was glad Carlson had been in the basilica that morning, because he sweated even more heavily than Dolan did. Then Dolan added that he saw the pope sweating too.

Without missing a beat, Vigneron told Dolan that the pope doesn't sweat: "The Holy Father 'dews,' " he said.

That was a joking reference to debates within the U.S. bishops' conference about whether or not to use the word "dew" in the new English translation of the Mass. Some people thought it had an appropriately sacral touch, while others found the term obscure and likely to be misunderstood. It was clear throughout that the Vatican is keen on "dew."

Those on hand Monday who'd sat through some of those sessions, which at times could seem endless, found Vigneron's line uproarious.

* * *

Visit NCR's blog, NCR Today, to read more of Allen's reporting from Rome this week.

"The exact meaning of

"The exact meaning of 'Catholic' is 'synthesis'"

and yet even here we see an "et, et" as he repeats the same things which has destroyed synthesis in the past, and drove a stake through our Church for nearly thirty years, severing forever some very precious limbs.

Perhaps it is only the incompleteness of the excellent John's preliminary sources which fail to mention any actual Peace and justice (One remembers the great Pope Paul VI decalring there is no peace without justice; one remembers Progressio populi and Evangelii nuntiandi; one remembers even earlier Pacem in Terris) issues. The strong presence nevertheless of the heads of the Pontifical Office of Justice and Peace, and the absence of the Holy Office, are hopeful signs for Truth and Charity. We can only hope to see an encyclical as clear as the final third of Sacramentum caritatis, which is pure liberation theology, as most readers were already over-satiated with what they sought in the first third's vertical spirituality. Perhaps His Holiness seizes an opportunity for greater clarity, for the majority of humanity, who are trapped in unrelenting and hopeless poverty.

John, it is your voice, your

John, it is your voice, your stance, your attitude that is the hope for those of us fatigued by the endless "war footing" on which so many in our church steadfastly remain. Yours is the voice of respect for all sincerely held and rigorously developed views.

People, some day we'll learn that the sniping is futile, that we must be about making ours a faith of invitation and not invective. Does anyone really believe that preoccupation with this Catholic version of the culture wars will convince anyone other than the converted? Or, is this distraction so gratifying that it will never give way to something more loving - and more productive? Please keep up your work, John.

Thank you again, John Allen.

Thank you again, John Allen. Now I believe Pope Benedict actually does have it right. I wish he were our president, and I didn't always feel this way. Unfortunately we have a president that is the same old deal. We do not have change, it's just said differently. People have to change spiritually to govern for all the people, not their own interests, as our Holy Father put it. Obama will meet the Pope. Will it change him?

Another great column John.

Another great column John. The meeting between the president and the pope will be one for the ages. We are very much looking forward to your coverage of this event.

Steve

I have to question whether it

I have to question whether it is possible for one person to live in the middle of these three tensions. Maybe it's the difficulty of holding these together that impels people toward one side or the other.

My adult faith requires that "the church and its pastors" listen to me in the same way that it wants me to listen to them and therein lies the difficulty. Ironically, Galileo is an example of someone who refused to submit himself to the scheme of his epoch.

The vertical-horizontal dichotomy seems the easiest one to resolve: "the believer's personal faith life and relationship with God" and "the community of the faithful and broader engagement with the world" are questions of emphasis in the areas of liturgy and architecture and personal faith expressions. Although it is possible to become out of balance.

It seems there is room for argument about when the "first moment of human life" occurs. Certainly there is historical evidence of the discussion.

It makes sense that there can be "no economic justice without individual morality". But to define justice as solely Jesus Christ ("There can be no just world, the pontiff has insisted, without Christ, who is the source of justice.") denies the possibility of morality and justice to countries where the predominant religion is not Christianity, and I can't follow the logic to that conclusion.

Interesting analysis re: the

Interesting analysis re: the new encyclical. Thanks.

As a former diocesan social ministries director, I reject the split between "prolife" efforts and "justice and peace"--although I acknowledge that the division exists in the thinking and attitudes of some folks. At the same time, I must say that there is, in the principial and practical orders, a legitimate distinction between the effort to secure the de facto and de jure right to life for unborn children, which in principle and practice every Catholic should support, and the various ways in which justice and peace may reasonably be pursued among Catholics across a wide range of issues, even though Catholics must, in principle and practice, support social justice. Being a Catholic who supports social justice does not predetermine one's specific political position on, for instance, Mr. Obama's tax policy or the extent of deficit spending or bilingual education or how best to ensure universal access to health care, or any number of other issues, while being a Catholic must determine one's stance on the issue of the legal right to life of unborn children.

Some Catholics need to learn to see the right to life as a "justice and peace" issue. Meanwhile, some Catholics need to see certain issues, such as the legal right to life of unborn children, as leaving little or no room for differences of prudential judgment among Catholics, while seeing that other issues admit of a variety of different Catholic approaches, even while those Catholics are convinced of the soundness of their own approaches on those issues.

I share John's love of good

I share John's love of good air cinditioning. I'm also excited about the 5 new pallium owners. B16 is doing much better than JPII on bishop appointments!

New Human Beings/reNEWed

New Human Beings/reNEWed World

One of the stunning things about God, (for me, as a constant wanna-be artist) is God's constant newness, constant massive creativity, "See, I make all things new."

So with this NEW ECONOMIC CRISIS, it's a chance to be new human beings. Besides we don't have a choice. Probably the Holy Spirit thinks it's a bit humorous to watch us, watch each other (online/high-tech wise)in a world-wide economic reshuffling.

If we can be BRILLIANT enough/illuminated enough to work smarter not harder on World Hunger, that would be the coolest of NEW human achievements in the 2000s.

There must be some new secrets to the FEEDING THE PLANET PROBLEM waiting out there, that the Holy Spirit has "hidden" for us to find, like an Easter egg hunt.

And genetically modified food is so NOT it!

LOVED THE laycentre.org web site. Naturally I'm most curious about the (artistic) lecture coming up right after this 4th of July weekend:

Uncovering a Baroque Perspective on the Laity

What a thrill for me to finally find out about actual, specific, classes, current and NEW in the great Rome, and the great "new" ecumenical studies approach there!

As usual, marvelous

As usual, marvelous reporting. Thanks for the story. I especially appreciated the Vigneron line.

Thank you for this succinct

Thank you for this succinct and informative article. Hopefully the both/and mindset will gain precedence over the either/or approach that so cripples both dialogue and understanding.

Why does the Vatican have

Why does the Vatican have "SECRET" Archives? Jesus said what He told the Apostles was to be shouted rooftop to rooftop. What is the point of being secretive. I've never understood this.

For the same reason that no

For the same reason that no country (or almost no institution) allows full access to archived documents for a certain period of time (75 years in the case of the U.S.). It protects the right to privacy of individuals who are mentioned in those documents.

What a great summary. Well

What a great summary. Well done John Allen!

i would also say that it is

i would also say that it is very important to READ IT and not try to read your own personal agenda INTO IT.

sadly, i don't think many will do this on either side of the political divide.

John thank you for your

John

thank you for your informative articles posted each week. We, here in the UK, receive the information usually 3 weeks after you have posted it. Your insight is valued and you judgement offers great reflective insight. I note that you were one of the few (no disrespect to other interested agencies or journalists) who followed the Pope to Africa. That, too, was very necessary and important. Thank you for your committment to the catholic cause and most importantly, for your contribution to the mission of the Church in the modern world. All too often we are subjected to narrow vision of fundamentalism in our church today.

Thank you for giving us an insight into the workings of Rome which helps us all in our interpretations.

I note that the Holy Father had no problem receiving President Obama amn his wife and children despite the misgivings of some of the US Bishops. Where was Bp Burke for the audience?????
Thanks you for all you do. God bless you, Fr Tom Ryan SMA

I especially enjoyed reading

I especially enjoyed reading Bishop Sergio Pagano's comments on Galileo. They relate to my interest in Padre Antonio Jose Martinez of Taos whom Bishop Jean Baptiste Lamy twice censured: 1858 suspension, and 1856 excommunication. The Territorial Legislalture of New Mexico called Padre Martinez, upon his death in 1867, LA HONRA DE SU PAIS, the honor of his homeland. In the Jubilee year 2000, I had the opportunity to research the Vatican Archives, including the those of the Secretariat of State including the "Secret Archives," as well of those of the Congregation for the Evangelization of Peoples, formerly called the Propagation of the Faith. I made some interesting finds, but nothing earthshaking. However, I recall with gratitude and appreciation the interest that Father Pagano took in my area of research, and his helpful guidance. By contrast, Father Timothy Dolan--then rector of the North American College's graduate division--was much more bureaucratic and effectively less helpful. They were both doing their respective jobs well, but from my perspective, with a slightly different pitch. Pagano papabile. B16, is doing fine, and VIVA!

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <font> <swf> <swf list>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You may use <swf file="song.mp3"> to display Flash files inline

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This is prove you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions. Solve the simple math problem.
10 + 9 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.