NCR on Kindle - NCR classifieds - YouTube - Twitter - Facebook - Email Alerts - RSS
Beyond a 'Darth Vader' view of secularism
The 67 million Catholics in the United States represent just six percent of the global Catholic population of 1.2 billion, but we sometimes have a hard time understanding how the other 94 percent lives. Beginning next week, there’s a golden opportunity to think more globally about the challenges of the early 21st century -- that is, if we’re paying attention.
The Synod of Bishops for the Middle East begins on Sunday morning in Rome with a papal Mass in St. Peter’s Basilica, and runs through Oct. 24.
| Read NCR's full coverage of the Synod of Bishops for the Middle East: Index of stories from the Synod. |
This will be the 23rd synod since the institution was launched under Paul VI in 1967. They bring together roughly 250 bishops, priests, religious women and men, and lay experts to advise the pope on some topic, and whatever else a synod may be -- an expensive talk shop to some, an experiment in collegiality for others -- they typically offer a graduate seminar in issues facing the global church.
Going in, one measure of success for this synod will be its ability to look beyond the usual bleak script about Christianity in the Middle East -- crisis, conflict, and the threat of extinction -- and also ponder the creative contributions the region can make to global Catholic reflection.
Nowhere is that potential more clear than in Christian thinking about secularism, where the churches of the Middle East could lead us beyond a one-sided “Darth Vader” perspective into a more balanced appraisal.
A Christian exodus
When Catholics in the West think about the church in the Middle East, it’s usually with a mix of pity and alarm. The “exodus” of Christians is well known: In 1948, Christians represented 20 percent of the population in what is now Israel and the Palestinian Territories; today they’re less than two percent, roughly 150,000 believers amid 7.4 million Israelis and almost 4 million Palestinians. The same pattern holds across the Middle East, where the total number of Arab Christians is thought to have dropped from 25 million in 1975 to 14 million today (out of a total population of 330 million).
Daniel Pipes, writing in the Middle East Quarterly a decade ago, predicted that within a relatively brief arc of time Christians “will effectively disappear from the region as a cultural and political force.”
NCR: February 17-March 1, 2012
Subscribe to NCR to get all the news and special features that aren't always available online. In this issue:
- Conscience Roundup
Hear what theologians, commentators, and our editors have to say about the contraception mandate
- Special Section: Religious Life
Work of missioners, past and future; African meetings; and more
- Tribute to a Peacemaker
New York's Pax Christi fetes Daniel Berrigan
The nightmare scenario is that Christianity could be extinguished in the land of its birth. When Pope Benedict XVI visited the region last year he called upon Christians to “persevere in faith, hope and love,” and to “maintain the church’s presence in the changing social fabric of these ancient lands.”
The out-migration of Christians has become an emblematic cause for currents in the West on both the right and left. For hawks, it illustrates the threat of Islamic radicalism; for doves, the urgency of ending the Israeli/Palestinian conflict, and especially putting more pressure on Israel to change its ways.
The exodus is certainly real, but talk of crisis and extinction needs to come with an industrial-sized caveat: Generalizations are the death of good analysis.
For sure, life is tougher by the day for Christians in some parts of the region, including Egypt (where the Coptic church is being targeted by Muslim radicals) and Iraq (where the once-sizeable Chaldean Christian community has been decimated). Yet there are also places where things are relatively stable, such as Syria, Jordan, and some of the smaller Gulf States. In 2008, the first new Catholic church on the Arabian peninsula since the Islamic conquest opened in Qatar, built on land donated by the Emir. Last year, the Latin Patriarch of Jerusalem announced plans to build a new Catholic University in Jordan, and right now two new parishes, one Latin and one Melkite, are being constructed at Bethany-beyond-the-Jordan.
All that suggests Christianity in the Middle East can get off life support when the conditions are right. As it happens, the synod might just have something fascinating to say about what those conditions look like.
Praising secularism, not burying it
Secularism is often the bogeyman of the Catholic imagination in the West. Say “secularism” to the typical European Catholic and they flash on the EU trying to cram liberal social policies down the throats of member nations, or the “Equality Laws” in the U.K. under Blair that made it illegal for Catholic adoption agencies not to serve same-sex couples, or the latest book attacking religion by Richard Dawkins or Christopher Hitchens.
Given those associations, secularism usually looms as the primary ideological and pastoral problem facing the church in the West.
Yet whatever one might think about it, secularism isn’t going away. Thus a towering challenge is to promote what Benedict XVI has repeatedly called a “positive secularism” -- a form of church/state separation that recognizes the positive culture-shaping role religion can play, without trying to drive it underground.
Arguably the most interesting laboratory on earth these days for Christian reflection on “positive secularism” lies in the Middle East.
Squeezed between two religiously defined behemoths -- Israel and the Muslim states which surround it -- the tiny Christian minority has no future if fundamentalism wins the day. As a result, nowhere on earth are Catholic leaders more zealous apostles of the separation of religion and state and the construction of a legal order that protects both pluralism and freedom of conscience.
In part, their advocacy reflects a basic law of religious life -- secularism always looks better to minorities who would be the big losers in a theocracy.
The working document reflects the input of Catholic bishops and other leaders across the region, and it reads like a manifesto for secular politics. It calls upon Christians to work for “an all-inclusive, shared civic order” that protects “human rights, human dignity and religious freedom.”
Twice, the document dwells on the concept of “positive laïcité” -- meaning a positive form of secularism. It cites a September 2008 speech in France by Pope Benedict, who borrowed the term “positive laïcité” from French President Nicolas Sarkozy.
“Catholics, together with other Christian citizens and Muslim thinkers and reformers, ought to be able to support initiatives at examining thoroughly the concept of the ‘positive laïcité’ of the State,” the synod document says.
“This could help eliminate the theocratic character of government and allow for greater equality among citizens of different religions,” the document asserts, “thereby fostering the promotion of a sound democracy, positively secular in nature, which fully acknowledges the role of religion … while completely respecting the distinction between the religious and civic orders.”
In forceful language, the document urges Christians not to retreat into a “ghetto,” but rather to work for the construction of a new social order across the Middle East. Perhaps to disarm Muslim criticism that secularism erodes the religious and moral fabric of a society, the document asserts that “the rights of a person are not in opposition to those of God.”
The document offers an additional argument in favor of positive secularism. If Muslims had more experience of separation of church and state, it says, they might be less inclined to blame all Christians for the perceived offenses of Western governments.
In addition to political Islam, the document also warns of another potentially toxic form of fundamentalism spreading across the region: Evangelical Christians who “use Sacred Scripture to justify Israel’s occupation of Palestine, making the position of Christian Arabs an even more sensitive issue.”
Admittedly, for the tiny Christian minority of the Middle East to try to engineer a social revolution in the direction of democracy and church/state separation is a tall order -- especially given its understandable historical reluctance to stick its head up.
“I don’t think people in the West appreciate to what extent the thematics of the synod are totally new to so much of the Church in the Middle East,” said Franciscan Fr. David Jaeger, an expert on the region.
“The whole discussion of the civic duty of the Christian ... is totally new. For thirteen centuries, Christians in the Middle East have been made to live in a kind of socio-economic ghetto,” he told Reuters Television in Rome.
Whatever its impact on Middle Eastern societies, the Christian experience in the Middle East can also help shape the culture of the global church.
Something like balance
The struggle against radical secularism -- what Benedict XVI has memorably described as a “dictatorship of relativism” -- has become an idée fixe both for the policy-making class in the church, as well as a broad swath of Catholic intellectuals and activists. Listening to some prophets of doom talk about secularism these days, all that’s missing is the “Imperial Death March” from “Star Wars” as a soundtrack.
One can certainly understand the reaction. Yet the danger is a sort of siege mentality, in which secularism is perceived primarily as a threat rather than as an opportunity for Christianity to flourish.
Properly organized, a healthy secular society means freedom for, not freedom from, religion. It offers space for a more “evangelical” form of Catholicism to develop, one not dependent on state sponsorship or legal privilege, relying instead on the attraction of the Gospel message and the boldness of those who proclaim it.
The positive Christian view of secularism boils down to this: Give us a fair and open marketplace of ideas and Christianity will be just fine.
Christians in the West sometimes think of secularism as a threat to that open marketplace of ideas, but in the Middle East secularism tends to loom instead as its last, best hope. Perhaps by combining those experiences and outlooks, Catholicism can find something approaching balance.
[John L. Allen Jr. is NCR senior correspondent. His e-mail address is jallen@ncronline.org.]
John Allen will be in Rome next week covering the Synod of Bishops for the Middle East. Watch the NCR Today blog for his regular reports. His first report is already up: Middle East synod is unique, and here's why
Editor's Note: We can send you an e-mail alert every time a All Things Catholic column is posted to NCRonline.org. Go to this page and follow directions: E-mail alert sign-up. If you already receive e-mail alerts from us, click on the "update my profile" button to add All Things Catholic to your list.







Three cheers for secularism.
Three cheers for secularism. We cannot go back to the old church slogan that error has no rights which the church used to exclude other religions. Catholicism as well as as other faiths has prospered in the US thanks to the secular nature of the society.
-3 cheers for secularism.
-3 cheers for secularism. Secularism is the active and overt agenda for the promotion of a secular and secularized society; it is not a laissez-faire attitude toward religious tolerance, i.e. religious non-favoritism by a government. Secularism strives for, ultimately, the absence of religion, not a benign plurality of religions. At first, it plays at being friendly toward all religions -- although besotted with none. But its real goal is to use churches as sheds for manure piles and tractors, as was done until 20 years ago in Russia. As the fear of God is the basis for all gifts and fruits, so is secularism the basis for embracing Satan's ways: as lucifer said "non servium", so also do secularists: they do not acknowledge God, and, if pressed, will acknowledge Him snarlingly, but then merely repeat their master's "non servium": atheism and secularism. Secularism is literally for metal robots, who have no souls. Man can do better. Man was created by God to know, love and serve Him. Our society must reflect this. The robots can go live on the moon and pretend God doesn't see them there.
"non serviAM." Satan knew his
"non serviAM." Satan knew his Latin verbs.
I was raised with secularism
I was raised with secularism as our family religion, and raised our three daughters in the same ethos. They are ethical,caring, loving, charitable, fair, intelligent adults, now raising their children in much the same mode. I totally believe in the right of any individual in any society to live by whatever creed he/she chooses. That freedom of religion should also protect the freedom to be an atheist, equally valued as a legitimate alternative. Wouldn't that be a lovely world!? It is remarkable how far from that place we are here on earth. Various religions and ethnicities have faced discrimination at some time or many times in their history.......and there is no sign of that going away. It just shifts foci every few generations. Achieving the synergy that your blog suggests should be our collective goal.
Let's hope that Western
Let's hope that Western Christia leaders can develop the same view of a progressive, healty secular society as the Eastern Christians. Unfortunately, the view of far too many Christian leaders - including many Catholic bishops and popes, has been to support secilarism whenever they represent a minority - but chnge their perspective if an when the achieve a majority. When will we learn that openness to free practice of all religions benefits all of us?
"Properly organized, a
"Properly organized, a healthy secular society means freedom for, not freedom from, religion."
Well said. The aggressive secularism of the New Atheists, as well as governments effectively shutting down Catholic adoption agencies (which doesn't help anyone), is a threat. A pluralistic world, however, that has room for people of faith is not a threat, but an opportunity for faith. Like the pope has said, the Catholic Church in such an environment can become a "creative minority." The truly faithful have always been and will always be a minority.
"Governments effectively
"Governments effectively shutting down Catholic adoption agencies"? No government has done such. Some bishops have chosen to serve no one if they have to serve gay citizens. They are perfectly free to make such a morally obtuse chioce. No government is forcing them to do otherwise, only their own misguided fundamentalism.
If "secularism always looks
If "secularism always looks better to minorities who would be the big losers in a theocracy", then a healthy secular society would mean freedom for and FROM, religion. Else a majority can trample the religious minorities through the legal system. Think of the blue laws that prohibited everyone from shopping on Sunday. Think of the attempts to define civil marriage by the rules of a few churches. I cherish my right to eat pork, regardless of what Jews do.
No, a healthy secular society
No, a healthy secular society absolutely does not mean freedom FROM religion.
After all, the only way to actually get that is to expel religion from the public square. Doing so raises serious problems regarding discrimination against the religious. After all, philosophical and ideological reasons for action aren't excluded.
As for the blue laws, I've lived in places with blue laws. They are inconvenient, but in general they can be easily lived around. Attacking them for being philosophically unacceptable is a waste of time. If the locals don't care they can be gotten rid of because of the inconvenience. If they do care you just mark yourself as a self-righteous prick, which is bad because it can lead people to ignore the Church improperly.
A most balanced evaluation of
A most balanced evaluation of secularism may be found in "Secularity and the Gospels" ed. by Ronald Rolheiser, 2006. Based on a series of conferences by Rolheiser's religious community between 2002 and 2005 participants explored secularity - it's positive dimensions and more problematic aspects. At the same time they discussed how both liberal and conservative wings of the church have approached secularity suggesting both strengths and blind spots in both approaches.
It's not the great evil shunned by conservatives nor the panacea embraced by liberals.
Before the triumph of
Before the triumph of secularism is the West, the Church could and regularly did torture and burn people who dared to question her doctrines, dogmas, and practices as well as advocate for scientific principles that today we know to be truths. The Church isn't allowed to do that anymore. Thank God for secularism!
Fact check, please: "This
Fact check, please:
"This will be the 23rd synod since the institution was launched under Paul VI in 1967."
Actually,
"The Synod of Bishops is a permanent institution established by Pope Paul VI, 15 September 1965, in response to the desire of the Fathers of the Second Vatican Council to keep alive the positive spirit engendered by the conciliar experience."
cf. http://www.vatican.va/news_services/press/documentazione/documents/sinod...
And I quote:
At the conclusion of a discourse beginning the last session of the Council (14 September 1965), Pope Paul VI himself made public his intention to establish the Synod of Bishops in the following words: “The advanced information that We Ourselves are happy to share with you is that We intend to give you some institution, called for by this Council, a ‘Synod of Bishops’, which will be made up of bishops nominated for the most part by the Episcopal Conferences with our approval and called by the Pope according to the needs of the Church, for his consultation and collaboration, when for the well-being of the Church it might seem to him opportune.
http://www.vatican.va/news_services/press/documentazione/documents/sinod...
Of course, historically speaking, the SYNOD was a remarkably powerful body, until papal power began to be centralized in Rome with the likes of Gregory VII et al. Unfortunately, they continue to be merely a CONSULTATIVE body, with little or no DELIBERATIVE function, thanks largely in part to John-Paul II's usurpation of power in the revised Code of Canon Law in 1983:
http://www.vatican.va/news_services/press/documentazione/documents/sinod...
http://www.jstor.org/pss/27677749
http://www.jstor.org/pss/27678230
Separation of church and
Separation of church and state is the only truly vital, serious, and sane way for freedom and liberty to be protected for all religions, including atheism. Only religious fundamentalism causes the need for wars, persecution, genocide, misogyny, child-abuse, pedophilia and ephebophilia, murder, rape, and all other horrific examples of Man's abuse of Man (and, most often, of women & children.
Hitler's Naziism, the Soviet Union's Totalitarianism, Stalin's and Lenin's Communism, Mussolini's Fascism, Marxism, and all other deadly "isms" result from the transformation of government leaders' beliefs into state religions enforced by violence, torture, and death. Tolerance is obliterated and is replaced by religious fervor/frenzy that is blind to human pain and suffering.
Any leader who claims to know what God wants him to do and that he is doing God's will is an audacious fool and should be regarded as insidious,insane,and dangerous. It is the first symptom of governmental insanity.
If you wish to be free to practice your religion in a true democracy, then it is essential that you learn to abide and protect atheism, agnosticism, and secularism. Otherwise, your particular "ism" might be next.
Thank you John Allen for a
Thank you John Allen for a refreshing (and authentically Catholic) perspective on secularism! I share your conviction that, all things being equal on the Public Square, Catholics have nothing to fear save their own cowardice to live out and defend the Gospel, for the Gospel faithfully shared is irresistible. Perhaps we too easily forget that it is the Holy Spirit who brings Conversion, and not our mortal compulsion.
The question is if secularism
The question is if secularism can reach a 'balance'. The Churche's opposition of secularism is not at all unreasonable as many 'secularists' are fanatics in their own right, trying to force THEIR view upon people who did not share it...
Former USSR and today's China are also 'secularized countries'... still they are not particularly shining for protecting the people's freedom of religion...
I agree that state and Church should be separated and there should be a degree of secularism, not to fall back into 'theocracies', yet even secularism can easily become an oppressive regime... and in the West sometimes it is more oppressive than it should be.
Don't forget that secularism
Don't forget that secularism comes at the cost of a strong community. For all the dirt that the Middle Ages received, the ancient concept of the city has a type of caritas that we will never know in an integrated, secularized society.
You mean we have to have
You mean we have to have slaves, outcasts, kings, serfs, clerical lords, bubonic plague,illiteracy and little food to eat so we'll be a more happy society?
"Don't forget that secularism
"Don't forget that secularism comes at the cost of a strong community. For all the dirt that the Middle Ages received, the ancient concept of the city has a type of caritas that we will never know in an integrated, secularized society."
Your concept of a strong community strikes me as an anti-Christian community: one that excludes those children of the One God who are not members of that community. The Christ that I have found in the Scriptures, and in Catholic teachings, is a person who constantly exhorts His followers to reach out with love to those considered outsiders.
Advise the Pope, you've got
Advise the Pope, you've got to be kidding...You must remember, that for all the nice,nice, talk; Rome still wants to control the Political future of ALL Nations,and to make all eastern rites of the Chruch cease and submit to the Latinization that is the Romen Model.
By casting off the Historical tittle of "Patriach of the West," in his first month as Pope, Benne has disqualified and demoted all of the other Historical Patrircial Sees; it is just another step in his consolidation of Imperial/Divine power. (oh! for the good old days when a pope could keep an Emperor, waitng in the snow, bare footed.)
Do you have any idea,of how many rites, Rome has supressed,in the last three Hundered years? Rites established by the Apostles and their successors? Sic semper tyranntus!
Well, Mr. Allen, I'm glad to
Well, Mr. Allen, I'm glad to read this "more balanced reflection" on secularism. Intensely I agree that seeing issues from more than our own restrictions frees them from the one-sidedness which has been promoted to us for many years. After all everything in reality is really muli-faceted. Plurality, common-ground, connectedness, solidarity, beauty arising out of opposites are immensely more preferable in helping to better things in our world. Cheers for the voices of minorities who allow us to see value in other sides of many important issues (one of which I think of is apparent lack of respect by the hierarchy for the voices of Asian laity in a recent "lay synod" held in South Korea where the planning and execution of which FABC was apparently left out)! Now may this new preference by the powers-that-be spread to other members of the household, ecclesia as well. Again I say "Cheers for the voices of minorities, vulnerable!"
A few years ago I saw a
A few years ago I saw a memorable news photo of a young woman at a rally against Hindu fundamentalism holding a sign saying "Preserve Secular India" adorned with a crucifix on top!
This comment is precious! I
This comment is precious! I will think of it all day!
Nothing is secular;
Nothing is secular; everything Sacred!
I REFUSE to believe either e
I REFUSE to believe either e coli or HIV are sacred!
When and where the Catholic
When and where the Catholic church has had total power it has abused it, and not just the Catholic church. Look at the Moslem fundamentalists today. The European kings of yesteryear.
I once took a business class wherein the teacher said "Power abused is power lost".
The Catholic church losing its total control over society is not something to be sorrowful over, it is to be celebrated. In this new reality the Catholic church is in its rightful place. It is there for people who choose to listen to it, but people who don't care for it aren't forced to pay it "no heed".
Why can't we just love one
Why can't we just love one another?
Post new comment