Benedict's 'Quiet Revolution', and a check-up on Catholic health care

A funny thing has happened as the story of a recent Vatican crackdown on a legendary monastery in Rome has made its way into the English-language press. I mean that literally -- the story has been turned into a joke, thereby obscuring its real significance.

For those with eyes to see, the suppression of the Cistercian abbey at the Basilica of the Holy Cross in Jerusalem, one of the traditional seven major pilgrimage sites in Rome, rates far more than placement in a "news of the weird" column. Instead, it's the latest chapter in what might be called a "Quiet Revolution" under Pope Benedict XVI, referring to a reform in clerical culture beginning in Rome and radiating beyond.

The essence of it is this: it's the end of the "by their fruits, you shall know them" logic that once translated into a free pass, or at least a strong benefit of the doubt, for superstar clerics and high-profile groups charged with misconduct. Once upon a time, the working assumption in officialdom often was that if someone is doing great good for the church, then allegations of sexual or financial impropriety against them were likely bogus, and taking them too seriously risked encouraging the enemies of the faith.

Without great fanfare, Benedict XVI has made it clear that today a new rule applies. No matter how accomplished a person or institution may be, if they're also involved in what the pontiff once memorably called the "filth" in the church, they're not beyond reach.

That's the deep significance of the Vatican's recent action vis-à-vis the Cistercians at the Basilica of Holy Cross in Jerusalem, though you certainly wouldn't get the point from most English-language coverage. A BBC headline on Thursday was typical: "Pope shuts down lap-dancing monastery," it said, playing off the fact that an ex-nightclub performer turned Catholic nun, Anna Nobili, once performed something called "the holy dance" in front of an audience at the basilica that included Vatican dignitaries.

In reality, however, the basilica was hardly a running joke.

First of all, the Cistercians have been at the basilica for almost five centuries, since 1561, and at one stage the Abbot of Holy Cross was also the Abbot General of the entire order. Given Benedict XVI's keen sense of tradition, as well as his reverence for the monastic life, it would take more than a dancing nun to trigger the suppression of the entire abbey.

Further, until quite recently the basilica was actually seen as a major success story. The consensus was that a renaissance was unfolding under Cistercian Abbot Simone Maria Fioraso, an ecclesiastical mover and shaker if ever there was one. Vocations were growing, and the basilica had become a crossroads for Italian nobility, political VIPs and pop culture icons.

Subscribe to NCR

Want to read more about important issues in the life of the Church? A subscription to NCR will keep you up to date and informed.

Subscribe now!

In the autumn of 2008, Fioraso scored his greatest PR coup. He organized a six-day reading of the entire text of the Bible, called "The Bible Day and Night," carried live on Italian state TV. The marathon was kicked off by Benedict XVI, and concluded by the Vatican's Secretary of State, Italian Cardinal Tarcisio Bertone. A slew of other Vatican potentates took part, along with celebrities such as actor Roberto Benigni and the former president of Italy, Carlo Azeglio Ciampi. (American Cardinals William Levada, Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, and Daniel DiNardo of Houston also participated. DiNardo was in town for a Synod on the Bible, which was the occasion for the Bible-reading festival.)

It's tough to overestimate what a media sensation the event constituted in Italy. Headlines proclaimed, "Holy Cross in Jerusalem becomes a superstar."

Yet around the same time, rumors began to swirl that something wasn't quite right. Some critics charged that Fioraso seemed more interested in cozying up to social elites than in the traditional disciplines of the monastic life, while others raised questions about money management, especially given that the monks ran a successful boutique and hotel, apparently without clear accounting of the revenue flows. More darkly, there were rumors of "inappropriate relationships" carried on by some of the monks, understood to be code for some sort of sexual misconduct.

All that might once have been dismissed as envy or defamation, especially given Fioraso's reputation as a rising star, but not this time. The Vatican's Congregation for Institutes of Consecrated Life and Societies of Apostolic Life launched an Apostolic Visitation, which ended in the dramatic decision to suppress the abbey entirely and to send its roughly 30 monks packing. The decree was signed by Brazilian Archbishop João Braz de Aviz, Prefect of the Congregation for Institutes of Consecrated Life and Societies of Apostolic Life, and by American Archbishop Joseph Tobin, his secretary. It was approved by Benedict XVI.

As is its practice, the Vatican hasn't provided a public explanation; in typically euphemistic argot, officials say only there were "numerous allegations of conduct incompatible with the vowed life." The gist is that there were real problems at the abbey, in terms of both financial accountability and personal morality.

As one official put it, "It was not a good scene."

The suppression is part of a pattern under Benedict XVI, which began with crackdowns against high-profile clerics such as Gino Burresi, founder of the Servants of the Immaculate Heart of Mary, and Marcial Maciel Degollado, founder of the Legionaries of Christ. More recently, in September 2008 Benedict laicized a well-known priest in Florence, Lelio Cantini, whose Queen of Peace parish was regarded as among the more dynamic in the country. Earlier this year, Benedict permanently removed Fernando Karadima from ministry, a legendary priest in Chile known as a spiritual guide to a large swath of the clergy and episcopacy.

All those cases, and others like them one could mention, pivoted on charges of sexual misconduct and abuse.

Also part of the picture are Benedict's policy moves to expedite procedures for weeding abusers out of the priesthood, including a recent set of revisions to canon law, as well as his decision earlier this year to create a new financial watchdog authority with the power to ride herd over once-untouchable entities such as the Vatican Bank or Propaganda Fide. The overall impression is that this is a pope weary of scandal, doing what he can to clean house.

Critics, of course, will object that this quiet revolution remains incomplete until it reaches into the episcopacy -- that is, until the bishops who presided over the sexual abuse crisis, or various financial scandals, or other forms of "filth" in the church, are themselves brought to account.

Whatever one makes of that objection, the fact remains that even an incomplete revolution is still a revolution. And that's no joke.

* * *
On Monday, I was in Fort Lauderdale to speak at a governance and management conference of Catholic Health East, a sprawling health care system employing some 54,000 people in facilities up and down the East Coast, ranging from Maine to Florida. Ranked by the number of visits, Catholic Health East is also the largest provider of home health care services in the nation.

While there, I had the chance to listen to presentations by four representatives of the sponsors of CHE facilities and systems. Together, they offered some valuable insights about the challenges facing Catholic health care, and how leaders in the field are thinking about them.

Sisters and sponsorship

First up was Mercy Sr. Barbara Wheeley, who coordinates the sponsors' council for Catholic Health East.

Wheeley observed that the idea of "sponsorship" of Catholic health care systems is, historically speaking, a novelty, having arisen only in the past 40 years. America's Catholic hospitals were largely built by religious women, but these days there simply aren't enough sisters to staff and administer them -- hence the notion of "sponsoring," rather than directly running, a hospital or system.

As Wheeley explained, many religious orders have erected institutions under church law, called "public juridical persons," to act as sponsors of their health care operations. Generally these "PJPs" are composed of a few sisters, along with laity who have both professional expertise as well as knowledge of the order's tradition.

Since these institutions are erected under church law and approved by Rome, Wheeley said, "We have a canonical responsibility to preserve the Catholic identity and integrity of our ministries."

Wheeley noted that quite often, the laity who serve on these sponsoring bodies are drawn from the ranks of "lay associates" of religious orders, which she called "a kind of new movement in the church." (A recent study by the Center for Applied Research in the Apostolate at Georgetown confirms that lay associates are indeed a growth industry. The total number of associates in America grew from around 15,000 in 1995 to more than 25,000 in 2007.)

Most women's orders expect to be able to continue sponsoring their health care systems "for at least a few more years," Wheeley said. Yet given the rising average age and declining membership of many communities, she said, they have to prepare for a time when they may not even be in a position to supply a handful of sisters to serve on a sponsoring body.

To prepare for that future, Wheeley said, Catholic Health East has developed a new institution called "Hope Ministries," a joint venture among the orders which make up the CHE system, which is itself a public juridical person under canon law. The idea is that Hope Ministries can take over sponsorship "when and if a religious community moves on, or just can't do it anymore," thereby preserving both the Catholic identity of the facility and at least something of the original order's tradition.

New sponsors: Hope Ministries

Wheeley's remarks provided a segue to Stanley Urban, a veteran Catholic health care executive who currently serves as the chairperson of Hope Ministries.

Urban explained that as a public juridical person, Hope Ministries has direct accountability to the Vatican. (Generally, approval to erect a public juridical person on behalf of a religious order is granted by the Vatican's Congregation for Institutes of Consecrated Life and Societies of Apostolic Life, popularly known as the "Congregation for Religious.")

Each year, Urban said, Hope Ministries files a "comprehensive written report" with the Vatican, outlining "how Catholic identity is being nurtured in these organizations and how Gospel values permeate them."

The governing board for Hope Ministries, Urban said, includes five lay persons and three women religious, representing the elected leadership of their communities. Urban said their internal conversations demonstrate "the true integration of laity into the ministry of sponsorship," because "you couldn't tell who's laity and who's religious based on the nature of the discussions or the contributions that people make."

On the whole, Urban said, the emergence of vehicles such as Hope Ministries suggest a viable future for Catholic health care, even beyond the possible eclipse of some of the founding women's orders.

"The Holy Spirit is indeed alive and well within our ministries," he said.

Partnerships, mergers and new models

Mercy Sr. Lorraine LaVigne tackled the changing business climate for hospitals and health care systems, noting that "various models of partnership" are emerging, often involving both Catholic and non-Catholic providers, which is inevitably a prescription for "complex relationships."

LaVigne ticked off five different forms these cooperative arrangements are taking:

  • Joint operating agreements
  • Joint ventures
  • Mergers
  • Affiliations
  • Contracts for specific areas of collaboration

All of the above, she said, can pose thorny "Catholic identity issues."

LaVigne pointed to a recent merger in New York, centering on St. Peter's Hospital in Albany, as an example of the "very creative partnering experiences" being pioneered these days.

(In late April, the Federal Trade Commission approved a three-way merger among St. Peter's Health Care Services in Albany, Northeast Health and Seton Health, with full integration expected to take roughly three years. Seton Health is a Catholic system, while Northeast Health is secular. The company resulting from the merger will be a member of Catholic Health East and has pledged to abide by the "Ethical and Religious Directives" of the U.S. bishops, but will not itself be a Catholic entity. Northeast Health will remain secular, while St. Peter's and Seton will retain their Catholic identities.)

LaVigne said that sponsoring orders are well aware that given the changing nature of the market, hospitals and health systems "will be exploring a variety of opportunities" along these lines. The key, she said, is to make sure that the sponsors are involved in the conversation from the beginning.

She suggested that in evaluating possibilities, the following key questions be asked:

  • Will the proposed new structure or agreement advance the mission and values of Catholic health care?
  • Will it meet an unmet need in the community, or increase the range of services?
  • Does the agreement have financial value for the hospital or system?
  • Are the possible partners aligned with the vision and strategy of Catholic Health East?

Women religious and the Apostolic Visitation

Finally, Sr. Kathleen Popko, President of the Sisters of Providence, offered a perspective on the relationship between women's religious communities and the official structures of the church, with a special eye to lessons learned from the current Vatican-sponsored "Apostolic Visitation" of women religious in America.

Popko defined women's orders as "a prophetic life form in the church," insisting that they are not to be seen as a "workforce for ecclesial projects." Religious orders "do not receive their mission from the church," Popko said, but rather each order "articulates its own."

Women religious "strive to work collaboratively with the ordained leadership of the church," Popko said. That said, she insisted they "are not agents of the church enforcing its teachings and policies," and they "must not be co-opted for institutional purposes."

Popko conceded that putting the accent on the "prophetic" role is in some ways a prescription for conflict, but insisted that's nothing new. Even casual perusal of the lives of founders in centuries past, she said, reveals that some were forced to leave their dioceses or removed from leadership, while their fledging communities had their assets taken away or faced other sanctions for "insubordination to the clergy."

Such tension, she said, continues to this day. In that context, she offered five lessons from the experience of the Apostolic Visitation which, she said, are also relevant to the challenges facing Catholic health care.

First, she said, the visitation has taught women religious to "look inward." In responding to the Vatican investigation, she said, women's orders found a deeper "sense of dignity" and of their own "competence," rooted in their history and accomplishments. That experience, she said, has fueled "a sense of cohesiveness and solidarity" that will outlast the visitation itself.

Second, Popko said, it's important "to network and collaborate," adapting a "flexible but common approach" when confronted with new challenges. Today, she said, the spirit among women's orders is "the most unified it's ever been in U.S. history," a unity which she said "happened at the grassroots."

Third, Popko urged, "Do not stand alone." Instead, she said, women's orders have drawn upon canon lawyers, theologians, and other experts, who have helped them develop a better-informed response to the visitation -- including, for instance, how to reply to requests for financial data and other internal information.

Fourth, Popko said, "Maintain engagement," including with the clergy, the bishops, and various currents within the laity. In responding to the visitation, she said, women's orders "did not rupture relationships. We've kept the conversation going."

Fifth, Popko said, the bottom line is "to remain faithful to the Gospel call." That has involved much soul-searching, she said, as women religious have struggled to maintain unity with church leaders, while remaining determined that "we must be true to ourselves, to our consciences, wherever that may lead us."

"In the history of the religious orders, we see that much positive change was initially rejected by the church but eventually accepted," Popko said, implying that the same trajectory may well play itself out again today.

* * *

As this column was going to press, we got the news that NCR Publisher Joe Feuerherd had lost a battle with cancer he'd been fighting since October 2009. He was just 48 years old.

The newspaper has already published an obituary of Joe, who was my friend, colleague, and boss over the years, winning my admiration and respect in each of those roles. I ask prayers for Joe, his family, and for the extended network of all who knew and cherished Joe's passion, his loyalty to his friends, his keen reporter's nose, and his unfailing sense of humor.

For myself, my sadness is mixed with faith that Joe is now part of the Communion of Saints. As a cardinal recently told me in Rome, apropos of the beatification of Pope John Paul II, "It's good to have friends in Heaven!"

I'm interested in the

I'm interested in the suppression of the Cistercian Abbey story. While I find his stand on various issues hard to take, I have always suspected that Benedict would not turn a blind eye to gross misconduct, the way his predecessor did, and that his PR people are a bit slack in showing us the positive side of the man's papacy. I am troubled, however, at the idea of '30 monks being sent packing'. Sent packing to where? If there are sexual abusers among these men, are they just being released into the community, or are the police informed of their whereabouts, so that their behaviour can be monitored? What about the good men among their number, and there must be some? Have they also been sent packing?

From another story, I think

From another story, I think they were spread out among other abbeys of their order. It SEEMS (again, I'm not sure) as though those allegations of sexual misconduct may not be abuse of minors, but rather inappropriate voluntary relationships with other adults. In any case, considering how Pope B16 responded to other abuse cases, I doubt he'd just move abusers around now.

I think Benedict should be

I think Benedict should be commended for his actions regarding the elite in the Church who believe that the rules don't apply to them. Though he shows a remarkable tin ear to many issues, it appears that he has gotten the message that the institutions of the church must walk the path preached. Now if he just would focus on the hierarchy itself i.e. bishops and cardinals...

"Critics, of course, will

"Critics, of course, will object that this quiet revolution remains incomplete until it reaches into the episcopacy -- that is, until the bishops who presided over the sexual abuse crisis, or various financial scandals, or other forms of "filth" in the church, are themselves brought to account."

Yes, until Bernard Law and his ilk are called to account, we have little confidence that there is any real change. The cycle of scandal will continue. That Law, Justin Rigali and Raymond Burke are the people who choose the new American bishops gives us very little confidence indeed.

OIL versus WATER, the

OIL versus WATER, the “Petrine” versus the “Marian”
============================================
The crisis of global energy is a metaphor for the crisis of religious relevance. The subordination of value, of right order, of oil over water, is tantamount to the subordination of female priesthood to male and the reversal of the “Naturalis Sacramentum Ordinis.” [google]

The reversal of this order by Roman Catholic culture is the triumph of ignorance over faith and arrogance over reason. Distrust and violence feed off each other as trust (faith) and humility (reason) feed off each other. Where oil presumes ordination over water, distrust and violence prevail over faith and reason.

The alienation of women from ordination in church culture effectively alienates people from each other and human culture from respect for nature, from the COSMIC ORDINATION of nature. The Order of Nature depends from/on cosmic resonances in this order: evolution, biology and theology; except for evolution, there is no life; except for life, there is no conscious biology; and except for rightly informed consciousness there is no authentic theology, no cultural conscience, no compassionate love. When theology denies evolution, it denies its own causality. Absent respect for natural order, communication fails faith, consciousness fails hope, and conscience fails love.

The frustration of faith, hope and love is the antithesis to Trinitarian Harmony, the realm of the anti-Christ, the frustration of the divine co-ordination of natural necessity and spiritual sanity. The Dark Ages hold power over light in the culture of female/ male alienation, i.e, in the culture of the “Petrine” over the “Marian,” of “oil” over “water.” This is the crisis of Roman Catholicism, the global crisis of nature; neither will be corrected "except both are corrected together." [Walter Brueggemann] http://www.gather.com/viewArticle.action?articleId=281474977542405

Sylvester "Pat", 1. I had to

Sylvester "Pat",
1. I had to make sure this was not some "robo" response. After reading it carefully, I realized it, unfortunately, was not.
2. I tried to envision you saying this aloud in a gathering of the Lord, His Disciples, and followers as they were walking. I tried.
3. Can we please stop agonizing over "women can't be priests" dilemma? The "faithfull" who want to keep pushing this really could spend their time more productively. Like it or not, Blessed John Paul II put this one to bed, case closed.
4. There are many women happily leading parishes, ministries, etc. that I and millions of Catholics are thanking God for and praying for.
5. You obviously are a person of great talents yourself. I sincerely pray and hope that you also use your talents to make a positive difference in the Church and other's lives. "It is better to light a candle than curse the darkness."

Truly, I pray and say to you, let us all build up the Church, of which we are brothers and sisters through Christ. As the darkness in this world grows, we are the light of the world and we must shine before all.

"3. Can we please stop

"3. Can we please stop agonizing over "women can't be priests" dilemma? The "faithfull" who want to keep pushing this really could spend their time more productively. Like it or not, Blessed John Paul II put this one to bed, case closed."

Skydan, would that be like the same way he ended the sexual abuse crisis?

Skydan Mystic, thank you for

Skydan Mystic, thank you for your well-intentioned bit of advice. With equal fervor, “I pray and say to you, let us all build up the Church, of which we are brothers and sisters through Christ. As the darkness in this world grows, we are the light of the world and we must shine before all.” My effort is “to make a positive difference in the Church and other’s lives.” How “can we … stop agonizing over "women can't be priests" dilemma?” Not by sweeping it under the carpet, but by dealing with it with compassion and honesty.

My concern is greater than the “women can’t be priests dilemma,” it has to do with the alienation of women from Church and with Roman Catholicism’s penchant for “entangling itself in knots of its own making.” [Rilke] My greater concern has to do with the “Law of Personal Conscience,” and its equivalent application to women and men alike, and for which patriarchal culture has little regard. It’s more than “little regard,” it is outright disregard.

The patriarchal expectation of fideism in Roman Catholic tradition is that its institutional dogma stands over and above personal conscience, even though the underlying premises are found to be without credence in the mind of the faithful — specifically in regard to the female/ male relationship.

Males of the human species have inherited the instinct to dominate and control (“herd”) females. In patriarchal culture this instinct is radicalized as a dogma of divine preference of males over females, i.e., Eve created from the rib of Adam. This “theological” presumption is radically flawed because maleness is an evolved differentiation that originates in femaleness. Fideistic patriarchy is flawed in its primary presumption. Inherited, presumptive male entitlement over females is at the root of cultural alienation.

I would be interested to know what specific misdirection I am guilty of that I should change in the interest of making a positive difference in the Church and other’s lives. I invite you to google “the law of personal conscience sylvester steffen” and tell me specifically how I am wrong and act in a way that does not build up the Church and makes a negative difference rather than a positive one.

Your political correctness

Your political correctness and emphasis on the evolution of culture and cultural norms, in other words "what other people think" deny the importance of what God thinks as communicated through His Holy Spirit. What's popular is not always what's good or right.

So, are you saying God does

So, are you saying God does not enable the evolutionary ascendance of culture and cultural norms? Do you believe that "grace supposes nature?"

Excellent article. Pope

Excellent article. Pope Benedict is indeed a reform Pope who is not afraid to do what is necessary. I hope that the Cistercians will be able to refound the monastery someday. I would remind Popko that fidelity is primarily to Christ and the Church. The reason there was a visitation of this monastery and the religious orders is because there were problems. Insubordination is one thing, theological heresy and moral problems are another. The Church is not going to accept the errors of radical feminism. Instead the religious orders need to do some soul searching so that they can be true to Christ, not just themselves.

I am curious to know what

I am curious to know what errors of radical feminism you are speakinhg of? Especially as pertains to orders of consecrataed women? Please do elaborate on your statement, Fr. J. That is rather a broad statement with no specifics and would be very interested in the specifics you apparently have in mind.

ALL of "RADICAL FEMINISM" IS

ALL of "RADICAL FEMINISM" IS AN ERROR.
Not several errors, one error: "I Will Not Serve"!
After listening to the harange of the feminazis for the past 50 years, it's just so old & strident! Go dance around an oak tree, maybe you'll feel better!

ALL of "RADICAL FEMINISM" IS

ALL of "RADICAL FEMINISM" IS AN ERROR.
Not several errors, one error: "I Will Not Serve"!
After listening to the harange of the feminazis for the past 50 years, it's just so old & strident! Go dance around an oak tree, maybe you'll feel better!

Excellent comment Fr. J. Oh,

Excellent comment Fr. J. Oh, incidentally, I have a bridge in New York to sell you.

I do not at all share your

I do not at all share your blanket statement of "...the errors of radical feminism." Not all feminism is radical, and not all feminism is composed of errors. These are the kinds of statements from (male) clergy that serve only to polarize and set up conflicts, while ignoring the central place of some women, as told in the Gospels at the very least, in Christ's ministry. It seems to me that, in Christian charity, perhaps Fr. J, you should heed your own advice for some soul searching.

Anon, I will be happy to give

Anon, I will be happy to give you some specifics. Womens ordination. It can't and won't happen. However, far too many womens religious communities regard it as an infallible doctrine. Another issue is abortion. In Arizona we had a sister who approved an abortion at a Catholic hospital. I can go on and mention homosexuality, liturgical insanity, and much much more. But you already knew all of this anyway didn't you? Often they seem to base their faith on feminism rather then the gospel.

Jordon, if you don't think that womens religious communities are in trouble then I have some swampland in Florida you might want to buy.

OHther, I am sure you don't share my view. You agree with radical feminism. For example mentioning "male" clergy as if that is a dirty word. Is it necessary to denigrate men in order to raise women up? As for polarization and conflicts, well women religious have been masters at that for decades now. I have experienced some of the charity exhibited by these radicalized sisters. The charity I offer them is the truth. They need to get their acts together and either be Catholic or be gone. I pity the poor sisters who are faithful and have watched their orders die. I remember one good sister who said she had to be careful because she was bedridden and when she pushed the call button "it was the others who decide whether or not to answer." How sad is that and how charitable is that? The visitation should have been 20 years ago.

You really can't help

You really can't help yourself from inserting adjectives into your writing, can you, even when it is unwarranted? I never said I agree with "radical" feminism, just like I do not agree with radical anything, such as your radical orthodoxy. And how about that term "radicalized sisters?" And claiming that women's religious communities regard female ordination as "infallible doctrine?" My comment about "(male) clergy" was in no way denigrating, but you have personally put that value on it. You mention the situation of an abortion being performed at an Arizona hospital - and of course you leave out that the sister was a member of an Ethics Board that considered the case and that there were ethical and theological issues considered in the process (even if one does not like the outcome). So, what this all comes out to is that you are a bigot, a hate-filled man who prefers to attack others, a distorter of the truths you purport to hold so dear, and with a distorted and twisted sense of being a Christian. You should learn how to express opinions that do not include attempts to slur others and do the kind of wholesale stereotyping that is so ingrained in your thinking. That way, you could start to really uderstand more about how to be an example to Christian charity. Right now you are just a pissed-off cleric (male - and I mean that in a nice way).

OHthor, don't be

OHthor, don't be disingenuous. Dissenters love to use the word "radical." You use some neat adjectives yourself in reference to me: "bigot, hate-filled, distorter, twisted..." This is yawn provoking typical of how "progressive" Catholics talk about others. I am sure you didn't mean to "slur" or "stereotype" me. I do stand in awe of your "charity." I have experienced it before from some of those women religious.

As to the "situation" of the murder of a child which the sister considered "ethical." I am sure the baby did not like the outcome. I guess my temerity of questioning the dissent in women's religious communities is more offensive then a Catholic religious who condones the murder of an innocent child in a Catholic hospital. I tend to see that as a perfect example of why they need the visitation and some suppressions to follow. Killing babies is pretty "radical." Those who support it...well you would not like the adjectives that I would use for such a villainy.

How about the error of

How about the error of deeply-ingrained, underlying (i.e., radical) misogyny, Father? Any observations on that?

I thought not.

G, sure I have some

G, sure I have some observations. One is that anytime you point out the errors or problems in religious communities you get accused of misogyny. This is a nifty way to avoid having to answer for ones misbehavior. Another is that it is no misogyny to disagree with the errors of radical feminism or to defend the Church's teaching on ordination. The real hate is experienced by those who dare to question women religious who undermine the faith of the Church.

Father J, I will pray for you

Father J,
I will pray for you and your fellow priests. Satan has many helpers who have singled you and your brothers out for especially vicious attacks. Liberalism, immorality, relativism, and hedonism rule the day. The Seven Deadly Sins seem to be a rite of passage for many and are hailed as virtuous in many circles. This "wicked generation" and it's ways shall pass away. The good works you and others do will, to varying degrees, bear fruit now and in future generations. The souls that priests guide, help save, lead to conversion and repentance, and provide the Sacraments to make the Devil furious and spark rage in his followers. We, the faithful and loyal to the Magisterium, know our prayers are not in vain. Christ has already won victory for us. Maybe those who are so quick to attack Father J and his brothers should search the blue cover Pieta prayer book to see what Jesus says about those who attack "My Priests".

I have some news for you. The

I have some news for you. The Pope does not believe in God or creation. He said so himself to the astronauts of the Space Shuttle Endeavour.Describing their mission as, quote, " an adventure to discover the origins of humanity." unquote. You have all been fooled by someone who pretends to know God. Geoffrey Strickland

when i want give a comment

when i want give a comment sometime i am joint with sleeping with wrote something

no one trouble when some

no one trouble when some people mother tonque english speaking ,much learn other foreign language .

this story a type liberalitation thinker.try make other no price.
while liberal always devils

Perhaps sometimes

Perhaps sometimes "revolutions" need to a bit noisier than quieter, to make certain that everyone gets the message. Think what the removal of an occasional bishop who'd knowingly covered up abuse would do. Not only would his episcopal colleagues get the message, but the faith of many in Rome's willingness to address such problems might even be restored.
At least, don't reward them with comfy sinecures (like St. Mary Major) -- that sends an entirely different messaage, both to the faithful and to the episcopacy.

John Allen's at it again:

John Allen's at it again: trying to make the Pope look good. From the article, "it's the latest chapter in what might be called a'"Quiet Revolution' under Pope Benedict XVI, referring to a reform in clerical culture beginning in Rome and radiating beyond."

Who is John Allen trying to kid? The words "reform in clerical culture beginning in Rome and radiating beyond" could never apply to Benedict. He has done his utmost to DESTROY the presence of any decent members of the clergy and instead appoint the lowest standard clergy that he can find, as long as they pledge obedience to him. The most recent, successful "quiet revolution" I know of was in the Province of Quebec where "quiet revolution" referred to Catholics' complete abandonment of the Catholic Church and all its pomps and control of Quebec's citizens and Quebec's government.

There is nothing "quiet" about Benedict XVI. Stealthy, yes. Underhanded, yes. I refer to the recent book by Fr. Matthew Fox, "The Pope's War," where there is a "wailing wall" of some 92 priests, religious and laity that were summarily dismissed from their teaching and ministerial positions by Ratzinger both as Cardinal and Pope for trumped charges of "non compliance with the Vatican Magisterium." A very lame excuse was 'rumored': "You are not promoting my kingdom of no-gospel values, Opus Dei, the Legionnaires of Christ and obsequious religious sisters."

When Benedict XVI disassociates himself from Opus Dei and the Legionnaires of Christ, and when he stops appointing Opus Dei bishops and cardinals, then and only then is it appropriate to talk about a "quiet revolution."

In addition the John Allen article states that the monastery was closed because "there were rumors of "inappropriate relationships" carried on by some of the monks, understood to be code for some sort of sexual misconduct."

Rumors! Really? What do you call what is 'rumored' to be going on among the Vatican clergy and other dignitaries in the so-called 'hallowed halls'? Will they close down the Vatican?

ONE CAN ONLY HOPE!!

May I suggest Jordan of

May I suggest Jordan of Saxony that you read some of Pope Benedicts astounding works like the 'Jesus of Nazareth' volumes instead of the malignant rubbish written by dissenters. In Pope Benedict XVI we have a model of virtue in his stand for truth, something that only angers those who cannot cope with humility. The Holy Father continues to sweep the Church from all that soils Her integrity and beauty.It is clear that you have a deep bitterness or that you are trying to be more Catholic than the Church. Please leave the broom in Pope Benedict's hands, he knows exactly where and when to use it.

May I suggest, Paula C, that

May I suggest, Paula C, that you read the Gospels. Then you will see how far the Vatican has moved away from the the teaching of Jesus of Nazareth. In all things, I prefer to follow Jesus. In all ways, I seek God.

May the Blessing of God, Father, Son and Holy Spirit be upon you, now and always!

And let us not forget other

And let us not forget other noteworthy examples of that quiet revolution:

- the firing of Bishop Morris, culpable of writing that he would ordain women if the Vatican allowed it
- the last-minute rescinding of an invitation for Father Radcliffe to speak at the Caritas International meeting, replacing him by the papal household homilist
- the last-minute rescinding, as requested by the Nuncio, of an invitation by Archbishop Kelly for Methodists to hold an ordination ceremony in the Catholic Cathedral.

In other words, we are witnessing centralization of power at the Vatican in all areas.

I don't see Law's name , or a

I don't see Law's name , or a dozen or more Bishops throughout the world...

"The suppression is part of a pattern under Benedict XVI, which began with crackdowns against high-profile clerics such as Gino Burresi, founder of the Servants of the Immaculate Heart of Mary, and Marcial Maciel Degollado, founder of the Legionaries of Christ. More recently, in September 2008 Benedict laicized a well-known priest in Florence, Lelio Cantini, whose Queen of Peace parish was regarded as among the more dynamic in the country. Earlier this year, Benedict permanently removed Fernando Karadima from ministry, a legendary priest in Chile known as a spiritual guide to a large swath of the clergy and episcopacy."

. That the Pope is

.

That the Pope is micromanaging morals problems away is very good news.

That American Catholic health-care facilities are compromising in major ways in order to retain rhe name "Catholic" is not good news. In my experience, when the nuns are no longer managing the care directly, bad things can happen. This is something that needs to be watched *very* closely. Patients and staff can easily suffer. I've seen that happen, and it's ugly.

.

An incomplete revolution is a

An incomplete revolution is a suspect revolution. Until Benedict takes bishops who throw our children to the sexual wolves among the clergy, to task, I'd say that this much ado about nothing. Except that this is a church where PR coups seem to have been mistaken for mission.

will someone please stop

will someone please stop Allen defending the indefensible.
Benedict's revolution will begin when he and the other hierarchs who protected abusers assume tier responsibility .
A revolution? Only in Allen's prejudiced mind.

NO PITY HERE! If

NO PITY HERE! If then-Cardinal Ratzinger had had the cojones to stand up to the globetrotting Santo Subito and his myopic PR machine years ago, he wouldn't have all this religious crap to be sweeping under his papal rugs today. And please don't spin these messes to try and turn him into either a VICTIM or a HERO! He is neither.

A funny thing happened on the

A funny thing happened on the way to this obscure analysis. John Allen did a checkup on Catholic healthcare. Way to go, mate.

If he was a faithful

If he was a faithful Christian, then he was always a part of the Communion of Saints! It's a fellowship of holy people, on earth, in purgatory, and on heaven. The Church.

Is that annual report made to

Is that annual report made to the Vatican also available to the public, at least the financial parts???
Accountability and transparency have not always been hallmarks of Curial methods, even today...

Sounds good to me. Pope

Sounds good to me. Pope Benedict is doing some good "weeding". Others want to set the entire field on fire because they have another agenda.

In addition to the Caritas

In addition to the Caritas situation and the Abbey, don't forget that he's removed three bishops since the beginning of the year! It looks like he's on the move! Deo gratias.

The Legionaries of Christ

The Legionaries of Christ (Catholic Moonies in my opinion) had a visitation once the founder's mistresses and children started to go public and starting money fights. A Commissioner, who is one of the Vatican's top financial men was appointed to reform the Legion. A year later, the same leaders remain in place; priests continue to be ordained and women to be "consecrated" in Regnum Christi, becoming virtual slaves with no human rights, no health insurance, absolutely no power in fact no free will and whose every thought emotion and action is tightly controlled. They do have a 7 year plan to tweak the constitutions so maybe that is the revolution.
It is good however to see even a miniscule change in direction.

Without meaning to, the real

Without meaning to, the real agenda of the progressive Catholic movement has been brought to light. Regardless of whether Dilbert is progressive or not, but he has nonetheless done us all a favor by telling truth about the progressive agenda. Dilbert says that priests and sisters in Regnum Christi have, "no human rights, no health insurance, absolutely no power". There it is, summed up neatly. Power. That is what the progressive or liberal Catholic wants, that's what it's all about. Power.

Thanks, Dilbert, for unwittingly exposing the true agenda and motivation behind the liberal or progressive movement in the Church. Power.

Please, John Allen, do you

Please, John Allen, do you really believe... "it's the latest chapter in what might be called a'Quiet Revolution' under Pope Benedict XVI, referring to a reform in clerical culture beginning in Rome and radiating beyond."

When he starts to clean up the secretive culture of the Curia and his own ultramontanism, that might be true.

In the meantime, he is cracking down on ANY diverse thinking within the global church, very little of which is related to sexual or other abuse. The sacked Bishop Bill Morris was a leader in cleaning up the abuse scandal in Australia and in positive pastoral leadership. His crime was to honestly explore different ways of ministering in a modern but remote region of the world.

So let's not confuse Ratzinger's behaviours on these two issues - centralism of power and reform of sexual abuse.

It is a case of "physician, heal thyself".

PROPHETIC LIFE FORM... YES

PROPHETIC LIFE FORM... YES !!!
MOST POSITIVE for Catholic Church are WOMEN.
WOW !! MOVE OVER... Here is Church of future.

Sr. Kathleen Popko, President of the Sisters of Providence, offered a perspective on the relationship between women's religious communities and the official structures of the church, with a special eye to lessons learned from the current Vatican-sponsored "Apostolic Visitation" of women religious in America.

Popko defined women's orders as "a prophetic life form in the church," insisting that they are not to be seen as a "workforce for ecclesial projects." Religious orders "do not receive their mission from the church," Popko said, but rather each order "articulates its own."
INTEGRITY - HOLY SPIRIT FILLED - CONSCIENCE BOUND
ALLELUIA !! ALLELUIA !! LISTEN TO THE WOMEN... AMEN !!

Once again, John Allen shows

Once again, John Allen shows that he is the one bright spot in a publication that, while still calling itself Catholic, devotes most of its energies to attacking the Church, the Pope, and the Magisterium. Nothing Pope Benedict did would satisfy the dissidents who lie in wait to attack him for anything he does, even when it is clearly designed to clean out the clerical 'filth' from the church.

Thank you to Allen for his very informative report on the closing of the Cistercian abbey which, as he says, has been described in the press as about a dancing nun. To find such a fair and accurate report in NCR about our Holy Father and his 'Quiet Revolution' is a special treat.

"we must be true to

"we must be true to ourselves, to our consciences, wherever that may lead us."
Is Benedict's "revolution" a sign of evolution? One can only hope. Evolution is Re-Membering Sacred Things, the basis of conscionable enlightenment.
========================================
The word SACRAMENT means “sacred remembrance” — and the process of intentional agency in remembering sacred things. All of nature is sacred because of ever-present “divine instance.” Vitality is about "re-membering," psychically, physically.

It’s in the order of nature (femaleness) to re-member; the evolved mechanism of two sexes (female-male) is the enabling basis of higher consciousness. In the higher order of consciousness the two sexes are mutually complementary and co-essential.

In the natural order of sacred remembrance, the sequence of connection is: evolution, biology and theology. Except for evolution, there is no biology, no theology. The higher order of consciousness could not be except for the lower foundational orders of evolution and biology.

Evolution is the working agency that gives memory connection (DNA) to sacred existence (divine instance), and is the essential process and precondition of the continuing work of biology (web-life connections) and theology (conscionable reflectivity.) Faith grounds in evolution; hope grounds in life; and love grounds in theology — Trimorphic Resonance.

C’mom hierarchy! C'mon Pope Benedict! Get in the game of life and rise above obsessive ignorance and arrogance. Don’t be spooked by the word evolution; just start mouthing it, and eventually you will catch on and get in the flow of life's ongoing process of re-membering. Benedict's "revolution" is no more than tampering around the fringes, unless it opens up to evolution. EVOLUTION ROCKS!

Ifind it unnerving that

Ifind it unnerving that someone can call catching up with few sexual predators with friends in high places is something we can call a "revolution." Some few clerics who deserve milstones around their necks got punished. How many more are there? Why did they get away with it for so long?

We really do not know what

We really do not know what went wrong at the Cistercian abbey at the Basilica of the Holy Cross. All we have is rumor which could be wrong. So we do not know if there is a quiet revolution. There is too much supposition and speculation. Were all 30 monks involved? We do not know. I am uneasy not knowing because secrecy can hide many kinds of abuse.

Has anyone followed the 30 monks and asked any of them what happened? What were the responses? Did any leave religious life? If there was conduct that was inappropriate with persons outside the abbey, did anyone contact these people and what were the responses?

I am uneasy when rumors are cited because no one takes responsibility for the statements. The rumors are put out so the unsophisticated reader jumps to conclusion.

To me the story is incomplete and the conclusions of the writer are not supported from the information.

I'll begin to believe it when

I'll begin to believe it when Bp. Finn goes.

I am uncomfortable with

I am uncomfortable with people being dismissed for vague reasons. I wonder if some innocent people with irritating political views are being tarred with a brush of sexual innuendo. Maybe all the examples John Allen named are in fact guilty of unsavory relationships, but we may never know.

It's hard to take this Pope

It's hard to take this Pope seriously as a man determined to get rid of sexual corruption in the church until he begins addressing the rampant sexual misconduct of priests molesting children all over the world and the church officials who spent years covering it up.

i am glad that someone above

i am glad that someone above in "comments" regarding the Cistercian Circus
menioned that Benedict has in fact done something: but the comment adds
a short and sharp spear at the Memorial edifice of Cardinal Law. Whatever the
merit of such "snippets" there is always merit in genuine wrath or spurts
of same.
CARDINAL LAW is esconced in Mary Major as a ceremonial pastor meaning
nothing except a plush circumstance and legal immunity: how does this square with
priests who get tossed out with no pension or health care for even the allegation
of misconduct and no opportunity for appeal.
LAW deserves the justice Benedict talks about--and these days in america, justice in
jail for a pedophile means death. Certainly all of us can come up with better answers
since a famous, reckless Jew said once WITH WHATSOEVER MEASURE YOU MEASURE,
IT SHALL BE MEASURED UNTO YOU.
James McCormick, mere Christian, KC MO

Post new comment

NCR Comment code:

  1. Be respectful. Do not attack the writer. Take on the idea, not the messenger.
  2. Use appropriate language. Avoid vulgarities and slurs.
  3. Keep to the point. Deliberate digressions don't aid the discussion.

For more detailed guidelines, visit our User Guidelines page.

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
(if you have one; if not, leave this blank)
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <font> <swf> <swf list>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You may use <swf file="song.mp3"> to display Flash files inline

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This is to prove you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.