NCR on Kindle - NCR classifieds - YouTube - Twitter - Facebook - Email Alerts - RSS
Faith saved by a mix of old and new
RECLAIMING CATHOLICISM:
TREASURES OLD AND NEW
Edited by Thomas H. Groome and Michael J. Daley
Published by Orbis Books, $22
I was born in 1975, well after the Second Vatican Council. My Catholic parish in the suburbs of St. Louis was a vibrant place of contemporary Christian music, Marian devotions, progressive dinners, eucharistic adorations and adult Bible studies. It was a mix of old and new, tradition and innovation.
This rather chaotic environment suited me in many ways, as it seemed, for the most part, that anything was possible. If there were two things that troubled my young mind, it was my inability to participate in church life as fully as the boys and my marginalization as a mixed Japanese-American girl in a parish that was largely white.
When we became old enough, the boys who wished to become altar servers were excused from class in order to be trained. I was crushed that I couldn’t join the boys. I was told instead to devote myself to the Blessed Mother -- but I could not see myself in her. At our church, Mary was a gorgeous, blond-haired, blue-eyed woman, and I was a chubby brown girl. It seemed just as impossible for me to identify with her as it was for me to follow the boys.
It would be a combination of old and new that would save my faith.
Could it be that retrieving our pre-Vatican II past is key for the church in the 21st century? So contend the authors of the fascinating book Reclaiming Catholicism. Thomas H. Groome, theology and religious education professor at Boston College, and Michael J. Daley, columnist and religious studies teacher at St. Xavier High School in Cincinnati, retrieve the past without critical nostalgia and make suggestions for future directions in the church.
Full of autobiographical reflections of a time prior to Vatican II, with narratives on important Catholic figures of the era, and examinations of Catholic practices past and present, the book is a valuable collection of story theology for the new millennium.
The volume’s authors are some of the most prominent Catholic theologians of the late 20th and early 21st centuries, including Richard McBrien, Ada María Isasi-Díaz, Susan Ross, Avery Dulles, Charles Curran, Mary Hines, Luke Timothy Johnson and Christine Gudorf. Those writers reflect on a wide range of people and issues, from Jesus, the Mass, Thomas Merton and Catholic schools, to Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, the Bible, Dorothy Day, Peter Maurin, parish life, the priesthood, contraception, and many more.
(Newscom)Familiar concerns emerge: the dwindling numbers of men and women religious, the lack of basic catechetical knowledge among the faithful, the loss of a Catholic cultural identity, and the declining significance of religious practices such as fasting, feasts and devotionals. However, this book does not propose regression. The authors argue that many of the changes initiated by Vatican II have been essential for making the church viable in the modern world, not least the church’s approach to religious freedom, to other religious traditions, and to science.
Vatican II made the church viable for me.
My Japanese-American mother had converted to Catholicism when she married my father, but she still had many Buddhist relatives. I was taught in school that only Christians were saved, and I feared for my Buddhist family. Luckily, my father had gone to a Catholic university in the years just after Vatican II. He helped me to understand the church’s more open stance toward persons from other traditions. And so, I became captivated by my grandmother’s family altar and learned to serve my ancestors through it. This love of the dead made me ripe for learning to love the saints.
Even if I still felt marginalized as a biracial girl, this connection among Buddhism, ancestors and saints allowed me to find a home in the church. Devotion to the saints may have been lost in many quarters of American Catholicism, but it is an aspect of my spirituality that has endured.
The book does an excellent job offering essays by and about women, both in appreciation for how women have been active members of the church and in critique for how they have also been shut out. There are fewer chapters dedicated to Catholics from underrepresented racial and ethnic communities. However, Cyprian Davis’ standout piece on the contributions of African Americans to the pre-Vatican church speaks well to the largely unknown history of black Catholics. And Isasi-Díaz’s touching chapter on devotion to Mary illustrates the ongoing significance of Marian devotion for contemporary struggles for liberation in Latin America and beyond.
Finally, there is little treatment of the church in relation to other religious traditions, though Mary Boys does an excellent job in her essay, particularly in regards to the church’s approach to Judaism.
Certainly, not all post-Vatican II American Catholics have the same concerns. The students I teach are incredibly diverse -- racially, ethnically, religiously, politically, economically -- and their concerns are just as diverse. However, I do see some convergences. Most of my graduate students are laypersons who work in parishes or teach religion in Catholic schools. Many struggle to be heard and fear that their church is regressing. For them, the process of reclamation is therefore fraught with risk.
My undergraduate students, however, seem less suspicious of religious authority. They simply ignore church teachings they find useless. If my graduate students tend to be concerned with the priest sex-abuse scandal and the visitation of women religious, my undergraduates tend to be concerned with the church’s approach to same-sex marriage and the environment.
Although the preoccupations of the past are not always the preoccupations of the present, reflecting on the past can teach us about who we are and where we are going. Reclaiming Catholicism is a wonderful collection of meditations on the church that invites us all to appreciate our past and imagine our future.
[Tracy Sayuki Tiemeier is assistant professor of theological studies at Loyola Marymount University, Los Angeles.]






Sounds like a great book.
Sounds like a great book. I'm ordering it today.
Please consider carefully
Please consider carefully this kernel from the review by Professor Sayuki-Tiemeier:
"Vatican II made the church viable for me. My Japanese-American mother had converted to Catholicism when she married my father, but she still had many Buddhist relatives. I was taught in school that only Christians were saved, and I feared for my Buddhist family. Luckily, my father had gone to a Catholic university in the years just after Vatican II. He helped me to understand the church’s more open stance toward persons from other traditions. And so, I became captivated by my grandmother’s family altar and learned to serve my ancestors through it. This love of the dead made me ripe for learning to love the saints. Even if I still felt marginalized as a biracial girl, this connection among Buddhism, ancestors and saints allowed me to find a home in the church. Devotion to the saints may have been lost in many quarters of American Catholicism, but it is an aspect of my spirituality that has endured."
Have you prayed with your immediate ancestors today?
In the Powerful Communion of Saints?
Nor have I, and so I read this again . . .
frère charles du désert OSB OBLAT (Congrégation de Subiaco)
After just reading this book
After just reading this book that was sent to me by a friend I must comment on how shallow is its assessment of the pre-Vatican II Catholic church and how
really un-appreciative of what has been lost, perhaps forever, of its beauty and culture in liturgical expression and general sense of the sacred and holy.
I am weary of this pre and post Vatican II analysis that only serves to further divide the faithful into factions and divisions within what is truly the Mystical Body of Christ...mostly initiated by those claiming the tenants of liberation theology. These heretics want to serve humanity claiming their "Catholicity" all the while decapitating the Mystical Body in refusing the Magisterium and the basic tenets of Truth. This book is a compilation of just such dissidents. They write about men and women of the past Church who
serve their purposes of twisting the faith, not by quoting them but by their
own interpretation of those holy lives. It is revisionist thinking at its best and it is mis-leading to add their names to its contentpages. Re-claiming
Catholcism is a mis-nomer...it should be more appropriately titled Re-inventing Catholicism. Thinking Catholics as well as observant Catholics should beware of the content in this book...it serves up the usual fakery and twisted theology of the McBrides, the Currans, the Boys, the Rohrs, the
Rolheisers, etc of the liberal left. Don't be misled by the inclusion of more sterling spokespersons of the past Church e.g. Fulton Sheen, Sister Madeleva, even Chesterton, who cannot raise their their objecting voices from their graves. The use of religion to serve nefarious political aims is a theme as old as the hills. To treat our Lord and Savior as politically motivated is blasphemous and to claim we can bring about the Kingdom of God here and now is about as false and idolotrous as it gets. It is all exposed here in this one volume, the falsity of liberation theology.
Nostalgia for something you
Nostalgia for something you obviously never experienced. I was there, raised in the midst of it, when Joe McCarthy was a Catholic hero. I remember Bishop Sheen speaking of married priests as "dogs returning to their vomit." Great theology, that! But beyond nostalgia, fear of what you obviously do not understand. Nothing new there. You have not been well-served by those who shape your mind.
'The use of religion to serve
'The use of religion to serve nefarious political aims is a theme as old as the hills. To treat our Lord and Savior as politically motivated is blasphemous'.
Does this apply to the right of the Republican Party too? If not, why not?
Wow!What prejudice, Adele.
Wow!What prejudice, Adele. Do you have any historical, biblical, theological background to make these statements? Please give them to us or I will continue to see you as a very prejudiced, narrow, "un-Catholic" person! Thanks!
This is a really interesting
This is a really interesting review you got here.
I have not read this book yet but i'll definitely going to order it !
Voici le site autocleaner, qui est consacré au lavage auto en France. AUTO CLEANER est une entreprise spécialisée dans le nettoyage de voitures à domicile.
Very interesting thoughts. It
Very interesting thoughts. It is a pity that people study theology and religion, if I may say so, when they are young and it is the last thing they care about. The same is with the books they read. From my own experience I see that with years I understand everything more deeply. I make different conclusions, I'm looking for the answers to the questions about our Universe. I think that people are interested in these questions when they are older. By the way, there are lots of new religious trends nowadays. I've watched about them a film. I found it at http://filecraft.com shared files SE . Modern religious movements try to combine science and theology. As for me, I don't like them. I think that we should look for the truth in main religions such as Christianity and Buddhism.
It is a misunderstanding -
It is a misunderstanding - often deliberately - some of my Protestant brothers and sisters in Christ. They tend to say that Catholics are based on works for salvation. This is not true, but does not seem to do much good to tell them, they persist in their false testimony.
Catholics know that salvation is based on faith, but we also know that faith without works is dead faith and works without faith are empty gestures.
Faith Christian extremists just say that profess faith in Jesus is all you have to do. After that, you can sit and watch http://paraorkut9.org/ for the rest of his life and still be "saved." You do not have to do anything. Catholics understand that profess faith is doing something, and that a Christian who does not act on their faith (doing things) is like having a beautiful new car that never leaves the garage.
Both are necessary for salvation, and both depend on each other for spiritual growth.
This article shows how
This article shows how important religion & culture is in human life. It’s not so easy to understand it. It cannot be changed as easily as some people think. When families are made within the same cultural groups both the couple find very homely environment. Not only the couple but also the children face problems in a intercultural families. Though the aim of all the religions is betterment of human life and liberation of soul but divergent cultural practices make us difficult to adjust. But when we can do it we really grow greater.
Padam @
Women Magazine
Sounds like a good experience
Sounds like a good experience thanks for sharing.