NCR on Kindle - NCR classifieds - YouTube - Twitter - Facebook - Email Alerts - RSS
Religion in Europe: Christianity on the defensive/Christianity under siege
Newscom: A stained-glass window in the Oude Kerk, a church surrounded by the red-light district of Amsterdam, the NetherlandsUntil recently, Amsterdams Oude Kerk, or Old Church, seemed the perfect symbol for Europes religious situation. Founded in the 13th century, when such massive cathedrals expressed the faith of an entire continent, the Oude Kerk is today surrounded by the Dutch citys infamous red-light district.
In Old Church Square visitors can choose from among at least a half-dozen brothels or sit down for a perfectly legal smoke in a hash bar. A bronze statue just outside the main door portrays a scantily clad woman in a provocative pose and carries the inscription, Respect sex workers around the world.
Inside the cathedral, the atmosphere is hardly any more conducive to prayer. Today the church is a museum and tourist destination. Like kudzu swallowing up crops in the American South, secularism has all but enveloped the Oude Kerk -- and with it, or so a longtime consensus once held, religious faith and practice across much of the old continent.
Thats the way things seemed until 2004, when Amsterdam offered a shocking new metaphor for the collision between the sacred and the secular in todays Europe: the murder of Dutch filmmaker Theo van Gogh by a Muslim radical named Mohammed Bouyeri, the son of Moroccan immigrants to Holland.
Though most Muslims insist that such violence cannot be justified by Islamic belief, the van Gogh murder, in tandem with bombings by Muslim radicals in Madrid in 2004 and London in 2005, has nonetheless generated a new look at secular European assumptions about the public irrelevance of religion. Launching a global interfaith project, former British Prime Minister Tony Blair recently asserted, Religious faith will be of the same significance to the 21st century as political ideology was to the 20th.
Id buy Christianity
No one knows exactly how many Muslims are in Europe today, in part because some are undocumented, and in part because several European nations dont include religion on their national census. Drawing upon various sources, the U.S. National Intelligence Council estimates that the Muslim population rose from 5 million in 1985 to 15 million in 2005, representing 200 percent growth. By 2050, the council expects 40 million Muslims in Europe, which would represent 15 percent of a population of roughly 500 million. (Thats without factoring in the possible admission of Turkey to the European Union.)
At one level, the anxieties unleashed by this rising tide are basically cultural -- that the erstwhile cradle of Christendom could find itself transformed into part of the dar al-Islam, or the global house of Islam. More recently, worries have surfaced that a secular backlash against Muslim demands for special treatment could erode traditional privileges for established Christian churches across Europe.
For some, this all means that Christianity in Europe will increasingly find itself on the defensive. Others, however, see opportunity.
If you are the type of person who buys stocks and bonds, Id buy Christianity, said Odon Vallet, a professor of religion at the Sorbonne in Paris. The price now is very low, so I think it has to go up.
Looking down the line at the implications of Europes growing Muslim presence, observers say at least three trajectories for Christianity seem plausible: Depending upon whos doing the forecasting, the rapid rise of Islam in Europe could be the final nail in the coffin for institutional Christianity or the harbinger of a surprising Christian revival. Still others believe that an aroused Christianity and Islam could pool forces against the dominant secular milieu.
One of these three trajectories is outlined in the Feb. 14 issue of the U.K.-based newsmagazine The Economist: new ambivalence about religion across the board. As an example of things to come, the story pointed to a 2001 decision from the European Court of Human Rights refusing to sanction an annulment issued by a Catholic tribunal in Italy.
Thats a worrisome prospect for many Christian leaders, and its not hard to understand why. Despite centuries of secularization, their patchwork of prerogatives across Europe remains extensive.
Dean Pictures/Francis Dean: A muslim woman on a street in Copenhagen, DenmarkFor example, although just 8 percent of Germans now attend religious services on a weekly basis, the German government still collects a mandatory church tax that nets 8.5 billion euros each year, with the lions share going to Lutherans and Catholics. The Catholic church uses that income to fund massive worldwide charitable operations such as Misereor and Adveniat, works it would struggle to support if it had to rely on voluntary donations.
The long-held prerogatives arent just about money, but also political clout. The British House of Lords, for example, sets aside 26 seats for diocesan bishops from the established Church of England. That privilege reflects an assumption that Anglican clergy are the nations conscience -- a questionable proposition these days, some might say, given a 2004 poll finding that just 44 percent of Brits say they believe in God, and 55 percent say they never go to church.
Such forms of state support for religion have long been criticized by European secularists, who say theyre relics of a bygone age. Today, that objection is being amplified by alarm that such perks may set a precedent for Islamic radicals to demand the right to apply Shariah or to otherwise seek exemptions from civil law. Archbishop of Canterbury Rowan Williams recently triggered fierce debate by suggesting that England may need to allow a limited application of Shariah to marital and financial matters, as Orthodox Jews are currently permitted to apply Jewish law to such questions.
Perhaps ironically, some European leftists are sounding alarms about an excess of tolerance, arguing that the values of the Enlightenment must be defended against religious fanaticism. In 2006, 12 left-leaning intellectuals, including Salman Rushdie, put out a manifesto suggesting that the real European fault line runs between theocrats and democrats. The thrust was to press for more thorough church/state separation. Although intended to curb Islamic extremism, such proposals could hit Christian churches the hardest, since they generally have the most to lose.
These conflicts wont always put Christianity on the losing side. Observers point to a case in Italy, where an Islamic firebrand in 2003 demanded that crucifixes be removed from a local public school. Virtually the entire political class rallied to the schools defense, and an appeals court in 2006 held that the crucifixes can stay as an expression of Italian national identity.
Nonetheless, some forms of Christian church belief can run up against an emerging European consensus on human rights.
In 2004, for example, a Pentecostal pastor was convicted in Sweden under laws against hate speech for declaring that homosexuality is a deep, cancerous tumor on all of society. The countrys Supreme Court later set aside the conviction under provisions in the European Convention on Human Rights concerning freedom of religion, but Swedish prosecutors have vowed to revisit the issue. In the same year in France, anti-gay comments were added to a class of prohibited speech, prompting Catholic leaders to express concern that the law might prevent bishops from opposing gay marriage. In 2007, the English government determined that any adoption agency that does not allow gay couples to adopt is in violation of English law.
From a juridical point of view, Christianity in Europe today thus finds itself between a rock and a hard place -- between concerns about coddling Islam, and an equally strong current of liberal secular opinion.
Vicarious religion
A second trajectory for European Christianity in this modern age, some observers believe, is that anxieties about religion in the public sphere could stimulate a Christian revival.
For one thing, experts say theres still a vestigial identification with Christianity in Europe that flares up under pressure. British sociologist Grace Davie calls this vicarious religion, pointing to Sweden in 1994, when a ferry sank en route from Estonia to Stockholm, killing more than 800 Swedish passengers. As the news broke, ultrasecular Swedes flocked to local churches. In moments of crisis, Davie concludes, even secular people instinctively want churches to perform their traditional roles.
AP/PA Wire/Stefan Rousseau: An anti-Shariah protester interrupts Archbishop Rowan Williams' Easter sermon March 23 at Canterbury Cathedral in Kent, England.The more Europeans perceive Islam as a threat, some analysts say, the more likely they are to fall back on this vicarious Christianity.
Theres a growing contingent of what one might call Christian atheists in todays Europe, meaning nonbelievers nevertheless committed to a strong defense of Christian culture. The German philosopher Jürgen Habermas, for example, describes himself as a secular nonbeliever, yet in a 2004 essay he declared: Christianity, and nothing else, is the ultimate foundation of liberty, conscience, human rights and democracy, the benchmarks of Western civilization. ... Everything else is idle postmodern chatter.
Hints of a revival also occasionally sprout up at the grass roots. In England, St. Georges Day is making a comeback. In Holland, books on Christian spirituality sold at record levels in 2007, and a prayer-in-the-workplace movement has been surprisingly popular. Crucifixes have been reintroduced to Catholic schools in the country. Also last year, Der Spiegel ran a story about a Christian revival in Germany headlined Religion, Born Again.
If Islam prods European Christianity into a more muscular posture, some experts say it could reap an identity dividend.
American sociologist Rodney Stark, for example, argues that globally it is religious movements with the clearest boundaries and the highest demands of members that flourish, a strategy he calls high-tension religion. Low-tension groups, he says, tend to be dissolved into the cauldron of secularism.
Christianitys best friend
Over time, yet a third outcome seems possible: Muslims and Christians could come to see secularism, rather than each other, as the real enemy. Under that scenario, Islam would be transformed from a threat into Christianitys best friend.
As counterintuitive as that might presently seem, theres precedent for it. The Vatican and Islamic nations, for example, joined forces in opposing abortion during United Nations conferences on population and women in the mid-1990s -- efforts dubbed an unholy alliance by critics from the European Union. More broadly, the Catholic church and Islamic leaders in Europe may find themselves shoulder to shoulder in defending the right of religious communities to express themselves in public debates.
In politics, some analysts believe the natural home of a Muslim middle class will ultimately be center-right parties, many of Christian origin, that defend traditional morality and a strong role for religion in public life. To some extent the future is now in Germany, where a small but growing number of Muslims are becoming Christian Democrats, the party chaired by Chancellor Angela Merkel.
Whether Christians and Muslims in Europe learn to think of themselves as allies, experts say, depends on how things develop on both sides. Muslims need to rein in the radicals, but Christians also need to be open-minded, according to the Rev. Johan Candelin of Finland, a pastor in the Swedish Lutheran church and head of the Religious Liberty Commission for the World Evangelical Alliance, a body that represents 420 million evangelical Christians in 128 nations.
Candelin recently led a delegation of Christian leaders to Greece to promote the religious freedom of Muslim Turkish immigrants. He conceded, however, that the prospects for collaboration remain uncertain.
Far from all Christians, Candelin said, are open-minded.
Some things wont change
These three trajectories are sometimes presented as either/or alternatives -- either partnership or conflict, either revival or demise. Reality, however, is usually more complicated. Most experts believe Europe will see some combination of all three scenarios.
Amid the uncertainty, it seems safe to bet that Christianity isnt going to disappear. The 8 million pilgrims who flock each year to the shrine of Padre Pio at San Giovanni Rotondo in southern Italy, for example, or the 12,000 worshipers who show up each Sunday at the Pentecostal church of Kingsway in London, may represent a subculture, but hardly one that seems headed for extinction.
Another bet among many is that Islam will be an important presence in tomorrows Europe, but is unlikely to set the cultural tone. Ralph Peters, a former American military intelligence official and longtime observer of European trends, summed up the argument that the continents liberal secular traditions are simply too strong to be extinguished.
There is zero chance of Europe becoming Eurabia, or of parts of Europe being governed formally by Shariah law, Peters said. The whole Muslims-are-taking-over hysteria is nuts.
Even if Swedes will no longer fight for Lutheranism, he said, by God, theyll kill without remorse to keep their saunas.
John L. Allen Jr. is NCR senior correspondent. His e-mail address is jallen@ncronline.org.
National Catholic Reporter June 13, 2008





There is a fourth
There is a fourth trajectory: a healthy separation of Church and State where secularism is not the enemy, Religion need not be the enemy, Religion, in all its forms, thrives, and so does the State. A major reason Christianity is in decline and secularism has been on the rise in Europe is that the Catholic Church was both Church and State for so long and was so oppressive in both arenas. Jesus had it right: give unto Caesar what is Caesar's and unto God what is God's.
Ed Gonzalez, you've got it
Ed Gonzalez, you've got it exactly back to front. The Catholic Church invented the idea of separating religion from the State and has always kept them strictly separate. Calvin, Henry VIII and the German princes who sponsored Luther were the first people in the history of Christianity to combine the church with the State.
Its sad that Mr. Allen
Its sad that Mr. Allen resorts to using Militaristic terms in his story
"Christianity under siege". I hope he gets his wish and Christianity increases
its defense spending. He writes all about threats, as if it would be somehow bad if Christianity were to end tomorrow. If it did, it only means, more people have become wiser then they were today.
This is one of the many reasons all religions, whether they wish to admit it or not, are by nature agents of Conflict. If we have a vast group of vanilla lovers, they will then, by definition be at odds with the Chocoloate lovers.
Why does this "club" even have to exist. You want to pray to the holy Spaghetti god in your house, do it. Just don't tell me about it, or argue that
your spaghetti is better, or more deserving of prayer than mine.
"Secularism is the enemy"... With this subtle comment Mr. Allen indicates that the real enemy of the people is....its own a-religious government. Nice going, lets create more antagonism.."PEOPLE OF ALL RELIGIONS, REBEL AGAINST YOUR GOVERNMENTS". What a peaceful idea.
Shameful, and sad.
It is sad that you resort to
It is sad that you resort to ridiculous and petty analogies: "chocolate" vs "vanilla lovers,” holy Spaghetti" in attempt to criticize (before understanding) matters you did not take time to consider seriously.
You keep attacking Christianity but do not dare using the term "islam" or "muslim" even once in your comment. Could it be out of fear that they would chop your head of along with all its secular beliefs?
Finally, you pertain to be a peace advocate. Did you even think twice about what kind of peace you are idealizing? The peace you are talking about is an "unjust peace," peace at the cost of liberty and most importantly truth. Is this kind of peace really worth advocating? I would suggest you reflect on what Allen has to say (and on the value of Christianity ) before making impulsive attacks on him. If you still are opposed to it, make a better argument !
The problem is that some
The problem is that some brands of “spaghetti gods” want to cut the throats of all those who dine on other brands, while other brands just want to argue the superiority of ingredients. The Communist brand spaghetti claimed no influence from any deity, yet slaughtered and tormented millions.
The Islamic brand of spaghetti, once it becomes the major brand, will convert every factory into their brand by violent military force. If you don’t believe me, just read Mohammed’s spaghetti recipe in the Koran.
Anonymous' comments from
Anonymous' comments from June 19 demonstrate the most apalling error of secularism: the idea that everything is relative and there is no such thing as objective Truth. Hence we get comments regarding worshiping spaghetti and how that is just as good as worshiping God or anything else.
What Anonymous fails to see or understand is that the "club" (as he or she calls it) is here to guide us toward the Truth and save us from ourselves. We are children, and we want what we want. Like children, what we want is not necessarily what is best for us. God is the parent setting the rules for us. We all know what happens when children are left unsupervised for too long: chaos reigns. Unfortunately, the kids seem more and more to be running the place.
The saddest part of all this is the sheer number of people turning away from God and therefore condeming themselves for eternity.
The least shameful thing is the fact that the Church still fights to save us. Thank God for that.
"Virtually the entire
"Virtually the entire political class rallied to the school’s defense, and an appeals court in 2006 held that the crucifixes can stay as an expression of Italian national identity."????????????????????????????
I'm a Italian High school teacher, I can assure you we don't have any crucifixes hang up in my public school, or in the other schools of my town.
All is not lost. We still
All is not lost. We still see sanctity in Europe. The finest example perhaps is the Novena at Clonard in Belfast.
Catholicism has always thrived in poverty and as a matterof fact religion has too. After this world wide depression most countries in Europe will 'get' religion again. This country is in exactly the same position. There will be a rennaisance of both writing and religion for they both seem to thrive in times like these.
I agree that ther might be a coalition between Islam and Christianity that will offset the power of the secularism. The media are saturated with what I call Idolatry of the body [Paris Hilton etc, Idolatry of the dollar [the Donald,Bill Gates etc] and idolatry of the inanity [ dog saves duck in pond or book disproves the existence of God]. The media has no anchor in anything except Idolatry. I agree with freedom of speech and freedom of religion of course bu I don't agree with freedom from reason and sanity. I could well imagine a day of protest in any country that would underline the need for sanity in government and in the media.
The problem is that some
The problem is that some brands of “spaghetti gods” want to cut the throats of all those who dine on other brands, while some brands just want to argue the superiority of ingredients. The Communist brand spaghetti claimed no influence from any deity, yet slaughtered and tormented millions.
The Islamic brand of spaghetti, once it has the largest market share, will convert every factory into their brand by violent military force. If you don’t believe me, just read Mohammed’s spaghetti recipe in the Koran.
Modernity with its inherent
Modernity with its inherent "creations of man" has allowed us the arrogance of worshiping ourselves!! When we will be, literally, hit with the limit of our so called "discoveries" with its inherent costs (whether easily visible or not) many of us, will easily come to understand that we are not the final arbiters of truth, and good judgment, and that we have come to more resemble Mr. HYDE -- harbinger of contortions and distortions of truth and good sense for the sake of self, giving rise to inventions, which work to engulf us all. Perhaps then, we might, more humbly, consider the possibility of an Ultimate source of energy, -- GOD.
Mr Ralph Peter's comment
Mr Ralph Peter's comment that "the continent’s liberal secular traditions are simply too strong to be extinguished" is seriously deluded.
European liberal secularism is possibly the weakest ideology that has ever appeared in the world. It has absolutely no chance against Islam, one of the most powerful ideologies of all time.
There is only one other ideology capable of standing up to Islam, and that is Catholicism, regrettably in full retreat in modern Europe.
Each and all of you, as read
Each and all of you, as read above, has a truth to tell. My own understanding is best expressed in the works of GK Chesterton on "Islam and Christianity," After one hundred years, GK is well worth his readings for continuing to be noted as the "apostle of common sense" in all ages. Now hear this:
1)Study and scruitinize Mohammadism for yourselves, later named Islam as expressed by and within itself from its own inception. Then read and recognize what terrible and bloody price has been exacted and un-easily won for with what we now still hopefully know as Western Civilization and Judeo-Christendom. With this came the terrible and wonderful divine empowerment of the birth of the person within the human individual--and most importantly, for the sovereignty of the self (SOUL)! All of this: inspired by constitutional framers who knew the lightness and darkness of human nature and the ever prevalent shadow of regression and degeneration.
2)Back to the caliph's, these 6th-10th century interpreter-elders themselves often became the very "killers of the holy word and killers of their holy book." The question is: WHY kill the very words that just came forth from your mouth according to a holy book? Because the caliph's themselves were not holy, the same with all clergy, religious, ministers and interpreters of God's word. Now remember Isaiah's words: "my Word will not return to me void."
3)The likes of Abraham's followers got smitten, scattered and sown in all directions, the likes of the Gallilean Jesus's followers got alientated, ridiculed and scouraged--unto a beyond the body saving resurrection, the likes of Allah are now ferociously vexing with an unconsolable and unquentiable thirst, wandering the vast deserts and corners of the earth--in search of, drawn to and yet innately hostile toward the flowing abundance of the spiritual and healing symbol of water itself, the spiritual rivers of life, of creation-centeredness (Judeo-Chritianity).
4)For the Mohammadan, the enemy-concept of finding a spiritual oasis in the desert, one where the waters themselves are flowing and never fixed (read the Word), is translated in caliph's terms as engaging with the infidel, the infidel's blood IS his water, the phantom river of no water that he/she will never find. Worse, it is like terminally wanting--what you can never have. Illumination, Enlightenment, Renaissance, seeing with new eyes, not pouring old wine into new wine skins, shedding ancient old skins--is all painfully necessary to the body-soul's life and psychic-spiritual well-being.
5)From my view, I have no doubt that the millions of peace-abiding Muslims are probably eons more religious, self-giving and charitable than the ho-hum Christian or Jew. Yet, it seems to be without the moving, mysterious, mystical waters of life (creation-centeredness). It is all fire, without water anywhere in its 14 centuries old memory.
Where is the hope and the bridge to one another? I have an idea that in this age of religious tri-angulation, that there is still the one conversation that all of the above might explore, engage in and mutually respect: that of the existence of mystery, mysticism and human good manners.
I doubt very much that
I doubt very much that "Christianity" can be "on the defensive", although many church organizations are. That is, if these words are still true:
"For he that made thee shall rule over thee, the Lord of hosts is his name: and thy Redeemer, the Holy One of Israel, shall be called the God of all the earth." That's Isaiah 54:5, from a 'restoration' chapter of the prophet often quoted by Jesus. (Lu 4:16ff) And Chapter 53 is the well-known tale of the "Despised, and the most abject of men, a man of sorrows, and acquainted with infirmity", who becomes a conqueror:
"Therefore will I distribute to [Jesus] very many [says God], and he shall divide the spoils of the strong, because he hath delivered his soul unto death."
The White Horseman of Revelation is pictured on the offensive; perhaps his nominal followers should have more faith in him.
. Any Christian Church that
.
Any Christian Church that "goes on the defensive" has lost its bearing, for the principal role of such a church is to evangelize or spread the Gospel -- a dynamic task (in your lingo, an "offensive" mission). And so, ought really to lay moribund and die.
Any Christian nation/society that depends on maintaining or riviving its animo from the emergence or growing deminance of a counter-force, idea or competitive religious or anti-religious factor has reached the depth of being a living lie, its church-edifices so many sepulchers or tombs that may still be resplendant outside but houses living corpses inside (to paraphrase the bible). In honesty, they should be torn down or sold for other purposes (as many have been turned to museaums, etc.)
For Christian Churches, by and large: In veritably all places on earth, one sees these twin phenomena spreading out like shadows on earth cast by a setting sun. The causes? There are many, but a major one is: the failure to keep its evangelization abreast with changing times, of the development of sciences and technologies and growth of libertarian, humanistic awareness of mankind. They have turned too much inward looking and concerned with preservations rather than missioning. They rely on antiquated modes of doing things and with issues that are so passe they need constant resusitating. In short, their "gospel" having been curved in marbles or etched in gold plaques speak of ancient wisdom rather than vibrant visions of the future much less living wisdom for the present. They have, in the first place, given up their role of shepherding their flocks actively and proactively on where and how they live. Had they been doing so, then the Gospel would have maintained its guiding light on the lives of the same.
"Born again churches"? Only if profoundly laiticized.
Secularism and such are not the causes of the churches decline in influence and meaning to the world. These be not the enemies, as that wonderful cartoon would put it, the enemies "are us," Christians (and Muslims, etc.)
yangelopu@gmail.com
.
The sad thing is that the
The sad thing is that the recession has begun in America. Obama saying he will observe National Prayer Day in private is but a small example of the times. My high school is full of human intellectual vanity. We say science is where we shall put our trust. We know NOTHING! Was it not 2500 years ago we all believed the world was flat? 500 years ago that we all believed the Earth was the center of the universe? Today we see a fire in science because of modern technology. We are in another science revolution but only one in observance (not comprehension), one that will change our understanding of the world. To rely on your senses as the portal to the external world is absolutely ludicris. Why it even contradicts most atheistic ideologies I have come across and that is to rely on sensory perception. It is also funny that science usually explains how but not why.
Now I know the church was in power during the helocentric years, but it was most definitely not in the flat years. Christianity also happened to be the birth of the Reniassance. Hmmm it's own poison. But knowledge has always been our enemy (for you nonbelievers just look at wars not a religious perspective on a power rage).
Post new comment