NCR on Kindle - NCR classifieds - YouTube - Twitter - Facebook - Email Alerts - RSS
U.S. women religious unclear about study
American women religious say they are cautiously optimistic that the two-year study of their life, ordered by the Vatican late last month, will give a truthful picture of their dedication and service to God, the church and the world, and that it will promote greater understanding of the lives of religious women in the United States.
But they are also expressing concern about not being consulted in the process, about the way in which it will be handled and about the confidentiality of the visitation reports.
Meanwhile, a U.S. women religious group Feb. 12th called the study “confusing, questionable, and biased.”
“The Vatican's expressed concern about the ‘quality of life’ of women's communities causes us to wonder why they are not equally concerned about communities of men religious. This double standard puzzles and perplexes us,” read the statement by the National Coalition of American Nuns.
Other sisters were asking: Why try to solve a problem that doesn’t exist?
“My response is difficult because we’ve had no direct communication” about the study, said Sr. Mary Ann Zollmann, president of the Blessed Virgin Mary (BVM) sisters of Dubuque, Iowa. Zollmann said that other than two messages from the Leadership Conference of Women Religious, of which she is a past president, “my only information has come from the media. … It has a different feel about it when you hear about it in the media. It remains quite tentative,” she told NCR in a telephone interview Feb. 10.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
'Next time, Let's have the Women study the Men:' A Commentary by NCR Editor Tom Fox
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zollmann said the BVMs, who comprise 556 sisters in the United States, Ecuador, Guatemala and Ghana, “have a wonderful story to tell of how our sisters have responded to the church’s invitation at Vatican II.”
She thought each congregation needed to “respond faithfully out of its own integrity” to the visitation process.
NCR: February 3-16, 2012
Subscribe to NCR to get all the news and special features that aren't always available online. In this issue:
- US News: Bishops Host Conference on Immigration
Conference fields advocates' questions on law, policy
- Special Section: Deacons. Serving as parish administrator; roles of wives; and more
- Study: Black Catholics are more engaged
New study by Notre Dame researcher about parish involvement in America
The BVMs are in a leadership team with Presentation, Franciscan, Dominican and Humility sisters in the Dubuque area. “Our approach [to the study] will be one of being connected” to these sister communities, she said.
Zollmann said it was “most important” to guarantee the confidentiality of each visit. It was her hope that the reports coming from the visits of Mother Mary Clare Millea and Sr. Eva-Maria Ackerman be shared and discussed among the sisters so that “we can all deepen our understanding” of religious life as it is lived in the United States.
In Newton, Mass., Sr. Suzanne Fondini, who heads the Missionary Franciscans of the Immaculate Conception, told NCR that her nuns look forward to Mother Clare’s visit so that sisters, associates and coworkers can share “the good works done in spreading the Gospel message, as well as living our evangelical call in our 21st-century world. The Franciscans are based in the United States and in Peru, Britain, Ireland, Papua New Guinea and Australia.
Sinsinawa Dominican Sr. Donna Quinn of Chicago wants the National Coalition of American Nuns, of which she is a cofounder and officer, to launch a women’s summit in response to the Vatican’s call for an apostolic visitation of congregations.
“This summit would share our lived experience as women,” she told NCR. It would also call for the ending of gender discrimination, which Quinn called the most deeply rooted, destructive and violent of all “isms” in organized religions and the world today.
She urged Rome to end “its continued educating, promoting and perpetuating this violence.” Before reviewing “our lived experience as nuns,” Quinn thought the Vatican ought first to apologize “for its complicity in refusing to build a church for our daughters and sons,” one that is devoid of sexism and uses inclusive language in its sacraments, liturgy and teaching, she said.
Most “grass-roots sisters” who have talked to Margaret Thompson since the Vatican study was disclosed in a Washington press conference Jan. 30 are “concerned, even disgusted, that the Leadership Conference of Women Religious was ignored and kept out of the loop” by the surprise announcement. “Most sisters are used to being involved in a process … and to a certain amount of transparency,” she told NCR.
Thompson, a professor of history and women’s studies at Syracuse University in New York, is the author of Nuns: A Vanishing Species in the Catholic Church? and is also an associate of the Monroe, Mich., Immaculate Heart of Mary community.
The professor thought Rome’s review order had arisen from a “quantitative, rather than a qualitative evaluation” of U.S. nuns. It is evident that nuns are graying and not growing, with some 120,000 fewer U.S. sisters today than at the end of Vatican II.
She pointed to the Vatican’s recent investigation of U.S. Catholic seminaries, which she said was prompted by the pedophilia crisis. “What is the comparable problem that has impelled this study?” she asked, noting, “Why is the Vatican trying to solve a problem that doesn’t exist?
Thompson, who said she was speaking for herself and not representing the views of any sisters or congregation, wondered why Millea and Ackerman were picked to run the visitation process. “We haven’t seen their credentials.
“I would have thought we could have assembled a committee of experts from among the many sisters who have demonstrated real scholarship in theology and sociology,” she said.
Neither Millea nor Ackerman comes from a large congregation. Both “bring the vision of a traditional community,” Thompson said, adding that such a vision is welcomed. However, she wondered if the Vatican meant to imply that such orders were to become “normative” for consecrated life.
“I hope I’m wrong, but I don’t think this is anything but a very reactionary attempt on the part of the hierarchy to impose its own solutions to problems they have been thinking about for decades.”
With the average age of American nuns being above 70, retired sisters are reserving their responses to the Vatican's Apostolic Visitation until more information is received - either directly to their leaders from Mother Mary Claire or through the LCWR, according to one sister who is in touch with several others through e-mail and daily living. Dominican Sr. Adrian Hofstetter, 89, who lives with some 50 sisters in the assisted living Motherhouse in St. Catherine, Ken., is still active in peace work and in helping sisters in the care center. The nuns share small resident communities of seven members and eat their meals together.
Conversation about the proposed Sister Visitation is ongoing with several of the sisters expressing hope that it will be worthwhile, but not an attempt to reverse changes in religious life that have occurred since the close of Vatican II, Hofstetter told NCR.
She thought a focus on the mission activities of religious orders "could be beneficial." Hofstetter said the four-to-five-year reconfiguration of the Kentucky community will end in April when the 200 sisters merge with six other Dominican congregations to become the Dominican Sisters of Peace. The new body will comprise 800 sisters and 500 aassociates. "We are intent on discovering the mission or missions we are being called to at this time," Hofstetter said.
Patricia Lefevere is a frequent NCR contributor.







Sister Zollmann is wrong. It
Sister Zollmann is wrong. It is not "most important" to guard the confidentiality of each visit. On the contrary, it is of vital importance that as much as light (media coverage?) be shone as possible on the entire PROCESS. FIAT LUX! and the brighter the better.
After reading the rants of
After reading the rants of some women religious in the Church, I can only conclude that they are totally out of touch with the needs and desires of the majority of women in the Church. "Inclusive language" and the end of "sexism" are concerns that only a person sitting in a faculty office has the luxury of fuming about. I am the mother of four children. I am 30 years old and grew up in a Church that completely failed to properly cathecize its youth. The Catholic education that many of these religious were privileged to recieve is becoming unattainable for many. The education and care of children has become denigraded in our society and deemed as low servile work.
We are called as a church to be one, united, to be hospitable and to act with charity. If these sisters truly believe they have nothing to hide from the Vatican, its puzzles me why they are so irritated that they will be evaluated. It can only be that some are too proud to recieve criticism. Let's face it. Most of these orders are dying.
I think it is not about
I think it is not about hiding the secrets. I think it is about 1) why this investigation? 2)how this is done? 3)who is doing it? They are not angry about the concern of the Church, but angry there is no transparency whatsoever in the process. It feels like police is questioning you without even letting you why you are questioned. Or maybe even worse. Those investigators seem not to have the convincing credentials to carry this out. It's like picking two kind garden kids to survey family problems. sort of.
"After reading the rants of
"After reading the rants of some women religious in the Church,......" Is this statement of yours one of the "acts of charity" to which our church calls us? Just because you don't agree with some statement, does not make it a "rant."
"they are totally out of touch with the needs and desires of the majority of women in the Church." Quite a statement to make; could you give me the facts and figures, the study upon which you base your claim?
""Inclusive language" and the end of "sexism" are concerns that only a person sitting in a faculty office has the luxury of fuming about." Again, how do you know that? Is there some kind of study that supports your claim?
There is plenty of room for those sisters who prefer a more traditional lifestyle; they do wonderful work and they are needed. Nevertheless, we also need those who are pioneering different religious lifestyles and charismas. A study of the history of religious life will make clear that religious life has never been static. What we now call "traditional" was once regarded as revolutionary, something that made the men in Rome nervous.
For 52 years I have been
For 52 years I have been Catholic. I have seen many sides of the Catholic church. The longer I live in the church the sadder I get at what I see happening. I applaud the women of the church who desire a greater role in the church. I shudder as the good old boy system of the church tightens the noose around women and the laity. What are they afraid of? People studying, growing, learning, deepening their love and relationship with God? The Church is a big Church, comprised of many people. The message I get from Church leadership is that those considered worthy is a very narrow group. Increasingly I see the line drawn in the sand. Is that how the heirarchy sees the women of the church? I know many of the BVM sisters. They have gone out of the traditional, taking the Gospel to many people in many new ways. There are hundreds of congregations like theirs doing similar works. Thank God for the women of the Church. May we continue to grow in appreciation of them. May our liturgical language become more inclusive. May we ALL answer God's call to us to enter into a fuller participation in the liturgy, the Church and the world.
I don't know why these nuns
I don't know why these nuns are so worried about the apostolic visit. The fact is that their commumities are dying out. In 20 years most will be extinct. What the visitation will find are religious who are mostly retired and/or living in nursing homes. Vocations are rare in most of the communities. I believe what these women fear is that the truth about their communities will be made public. The American public will finally become aware of these communities' liberal theologies based on feminism, social activism, eco-spirituality, new are ideologies, and a hunger for power. This may result in many withdrawing their financial support from the religious communities.
"Hunger for power?" Good
"Hunger for power?" Good heavens. I have never seen that in any of the sisters I have had dealings with. What I do see is women who are trying to carry the love of Christ to the world in new ways, to meet new needs. Tht will always get you in trouble (remember Jesus?) Power? Yes, I do think it is about power, the power to follow the Holy Spirit. I think women are much better at that then a lot of men. I think the Vatican is very, very afraid of women and any sign of independence they may show...it scares them.....God forbid....now they want to be priests. I think the sisters would have a lot less problem with this visitation if EXACTLY the same type of visitation and method was applied to men's congregations. But don't expect that. And inclusive language! The things said and written about that are unbelievable. If the opponents would only realize that "man" is no longer generic they would come a long way in understanding the importance of praying inclusively. It is intersting that the things the Vatican has issue with regarding the active sisters are things many, many contemplative nuns already do....yet the Vatican does not stop them.....maybe it is that the active sisters are out there in front of us all and have wider influence, I don't know. I just hope the good sisters don't get discouraged with all this.....they are sharing in the passion of Christ....sometimes it is the 'leaders' that cause us the greatest problems in following the GOspel.
If you are following the
If you are following the teachings of Christ in word and deed?
Post new comment