Asian women religious caught between ideals, realities

Theological education viewed as critical to the advance of Catholic women

Nov. 02, 2009
AMOR XV delegates meet with local Buddhists
Printer-friendly versionPrinter-friendly versionSend to friendSend to friendPDF versionPDF version

Samphran, Thailand

Analysis

Asian Catholic women religious leaders find themselves entering an uncertain limbo, caught between their church's gospel teachings and lofty pro-women rhetoric, on the one hand; and limiting, social, cultural and ecclesial realities, on the other.

It seems this is a place where countless educated Catholic women throughout the world find themselves, but it is a special reality in Asia where centuries of patriarchal religious customs resistant to change clash with Catholic women who are increasingly being exposed to contemporary spirituality and feminist theological thought.

The tensions between Christian ideals and Catholic realities, between gospel imperatives and more traditional women's roles in Asian societies, were on display during nine days of talks and reflections at AMOR XV, a gathering here of 115 women religious leaders from throughout Asia and Oceania.

When the women concluded their meeting with great enthusiasm and hope they issued a statement pledging radical shifts in the way they carry out their missions, and another offering prayerful solidarity with U.S. women religious facing two Vatican investigations.

AMOR stands for Meeting of Asia and Oceania Religious and the women gather every few years to listen, share stories and encourage each other. In the process, many of their common frustrations come to light as they talk about ways in which church structures limit their contributions as active agents of the gospel.

Echoing a passage in Mark's gospel (7:24-29) in which a Syro-Phoenician Woman challenged Jesus, the women pledged to "move beyond" and renew their internal spiritual centers as they gather strength to challenge external structures and habits.

The gathering was held Oct. 13-21 and the theme, "Called to Move Beyond," was the primary motif of the meeting and the women took it seriously throughout their discussions, which included many spiritual reflections.

Notably, AMOR XV was held in Thailand, a nation characterized by ancient patriarchal religious structures but a nation in which women have made great social strides in recent decades. Thailand mirrors much of the rest of Asia, where conservative traditions have come into conflict with outside forces, some for the good, and others for the bad.

Throughout this change, women in Asia have had greater access to education and with it have come more demands for gender equity. Moves in the direction of equity have gained foothold in politics, social and financial structures. A notable exception has been within the ranks of the Catholic church.

Several years ago, for example, Korean women, after having had virtually no role in the nation's political life, pushed hard and won a 30 percent quota in the Seoul parliament. Following suit, Catholic women pushed for a 30 -- then a 20 -- percent quota on church committees, including parish councils. The Korean bishops, however, have ignored these requests.

Indian Catholic women have also pressed hard for more open dialogue with the church hierarchy on women's roles within the church. These requests have also largely been ignored.

When the Federation of Asian Bishops Conference met in Manila last August reportedly of the 60 people who addressed the assembly only one was a woman.

Educated Asian women religious, pious by nature and characteristically reluctant to challenge authority, nevertheless, feel pinched between the liberating mandates of the gospel, as they have begun to see them, and the more restrictive habits of local bishops.

The pot has been simmering for four decades now.

It was in 1970, in the wake of Vatican II that the Asian bishops formed the Federation of Asian Bishops Conferences, (FABC) a pan-Asian umbrella organization aimed at increasing dialogue. This dialogue eventually was to include women.

When the FABC met in a plenary session Tokyo in 1986 enough women's voices had been heard to pressure the bishops is address the issue. They wrote that it is "not just a human necessity but a gospel imperative that women are recognized and their dignity restored, and that they are allowed to play their rightful role in the world and in the church."

The FABC, meeting in Malaysia in 1993, recommended setting up a women's commission and encouraged the national bishops' conferences to do the same, with one of the objectives to promote "encounters and dialogue between women and men in the church, especially in decision-making."

The FABC, meeting in Manila in 1995, said it was "an urgent pastoral imperative" for women "to exercise their right to co-responsibility and mutuality with men -- in society and in the church."

The Asian bishops called for women's commission to be set up within the office of the laity and in the years that followed women and bishops came together, but out of this little changed.

For its part, AMOR was part of the spiritual awakening and justice response that followed Vatican II and the 1971 synod on justice at which the bishops of the church stated that "action on behalf of justice is constitutive of the gospel." Asian women recognized that a call for justice could not exclude the church itself. There have now been 15 AMOR gatherings.

It was, meanwhile, in November 2002 that the Asian women took discourse and organizing to a new level. Fifty-five Asian women theologians that month gathered in Bangkok to create an organization called "Ecclesia of Woman in Asia" (EWA). The idea for the organization was given birth a year earlier in India at an Asian theological conference held to reflect on the document, "Ecclesia in Asia," issued in 1999 by Pope John Paul II, following the 1998 Asian synod held in Rome.

Reflecting the growing frustration of Asian women theologians, the title of the five-day 2002 gathering was "Ecclesia of Women in Asia: Gathering the Voices of the Silenced." Their aim was to build a more inclusive church.

That first EWA conference drew 60 women from 18 Asian nations: China, Hong Kong, Taiwan, Korea, Japan, Vietnam, Philippines, Malaysia, Singapore, Indonesia, East Timor, Thailand, Myanmar, Pakistan, Bangladesh, India, Sri Lanka and Australia.

Neither AMOR nor EWA have canonical status. Both have provided platforms for Asian women

Asian women religious, meanwhile, have quietly found ways to take their missions increasingly into their own hands, breaking out of models of religious congregations that have worked to keep clerical institutions running.

An example of this self-determination is evident in the opening earlier this year by Indian women religious of a new theology research institute whose purpose is to empower women religious.

The ideas for the center came out of a meeting last year of some 350 women religious superiors, representing more than 90,000 women religious. Its stated aim is to carry out research on gender issues and women's studies, with special emphasis on theological and religious perspectives. The Indian women religious say they recognize education and particularly theological education, is key to advancing women in the church.

Asian women religious, as the AMOR XV assembly showed, increasingly are finding the need to become active agents of their own journeys. No congregation has mentioned bolting from the ranks, but many are increasingly vocal about perceived injustices outside -- and inside the church – and together they are working to respond to a call to "move beyond."

Tom Fox is NCR editor and can be reached at tfox@ncronline.org.

After five years of teaching

After five years of teaching in Asia (Japan, mainland China, Taiwan and Hong Kong) I am still extremely reluctant to presume to be able to speak intelligently on the ways and means of Asian peoples - in or out of church. And I remain highly suspicious of any other Westerners trying to interpret, see patterns or predict directions especially when it involves imposing Occidental paradigms or identifying parallels to Oriental manifestations of religious life.

Jesuit missionary Li Madou (Matteo Ricci, 1552-1610) spent the better part of his life in China and even after mastering both spoken and written Mandarin realized that he had barely scratched the surface of understanding.

http://www.chinaculture.org/gb/en_aboutchina/2003-09/24/content_24689.htm

Ricci was certainly humble

Ricci was certainly humble and modest in his approach to China, its Emperor, culture and people, saying he had come to learn, rather than teach. The first European to write a book in Chinese, he is the prime model of sensitive missionary outreach to other cultures.

Today millions of Asians express themselves - even write highly acclaimed books in excellent English. Consequently I don't doubt Tom's ability to understand, express and comment on Asian religious women's hopes, problems, aspirations and frustrations as conference members expressed them -- in English !

Ricci's story highlights a different problem. Rome decided it knew more about the correct Chinese name for God than either Ricci or the Chinese Emperor ! The late Julia Ching helped Hans Kung write on this (Kung: Does God Exist ? pp. 588 - 594) Only centuries later (in 1940 - when the world's attention was on Poland, rather than China) did Pius XII apologize for an error with enormous consequences.

Dear Mr. McKee, as you

Dear Mr. McKee, as you mentioned five years of teaching in (essentially) Chinese contexted venues (with the exception of your Japanese sojourn)is hardly enough for an outsider to adequately convey the depth & breadth of extremely diverse modes of living. However, your conclusion that if you can't, then it's probable that no "Occidental" will succeed either. Your one example Fr. Ricci, genius that he was, realized his perceptions (though not limited in time as yours)were confined to a particular segment of Chinese culture due to personal, sociological and historical conditions. When it comes to this I think his kind perceptions probably were similar to the Jesuits who came to the Americas at around the same time: I'm sure they realized they "barely scratched the surface of understanding" the hows and whys of the indigenous people with whom they walked.

However, I find your suspicions a bit dismaying. I'm put off by a sidewise put down of the meat of this article, that Asian women religious are growing restive and desirous for change as well as beginning to raise their voices in ways accessible to them. For my part I'm more than willing to accept Tom Fox's conclusions. His Asian experience covers much more than limited teaching experiences over a mere five years. Perhsps it'd be good if you'd check out his professional and personal backgrounds as well as his previous literary contributions.

As woman, I have another problem with your statements about paradigms and parallel movements - of Asian women religious and of "Occidental" women religious. Perhaps you're not aware that internet has helped women all over the world to better convey to each other long-repressed hurts and desires, passion and rage, and finding ways to alleviate these following the Gospels. Perhaps you're not aware of these particular Asian women, from many countries, who've learned of trouble facing their sisters in faith and gender. They've sympathized with and committed, in solidarity, to support and walk with their counterparts in the U.S.A. This has nothing to do with "imposing paradigms or identifying parallels" between these sisters. It has everything to do with women finding commonalities and acting on these. Following your lead, I am also highly suspicious of a male who portends to tell us women that we're mistaken in wanting some say in how we live as Baptized followers of Jesus Christ. Like Matteo Ricci, a hero of mine by the way, I hope that you come someday to say that your relationships with women have yet to "scratch the surface" of who we are and what we want.

When you

Mea culpa, Ms. Krebs, My main

Mea culpa, Ms. Krebs,

My main fear in reading this article is that Asian women religious will become victims of "guilt by association" by linking their hopes and aspirations together with currently being investigated U.S. women by Mr. Fox's astute observations -albeit couched in rather Western polemical language- and thereby "connecting the dots" for less perspicacious Curial types and placing them on Rode and Levada's hit list as well.

That being said, I took your advice and have further researched Mr. Fox's most impressive East-West credentials and journey (cf. http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1141/is_12_41/ai_n9510523/pg_5/?t... ) and while I was already aware of his Orbis opus "Pentecost in Asia," I have just ordered it (discovering that his name is spelled wrong on the amazon listing!!) and will read it for Advent.

http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/157075442X/ref=pd_luc_mri?...

Not afraid to admit mistakes here in Hong Kong, and always willing to listen to a voice of reason such as yours.

It would be interesting to

It would be interesting to have the leadership of LCWR and AMOR spend time together.

God bless our Asian Sisters.

God bless our Asian Sisters.

It's pretty clear that the

It's pretty clear that the root of the problem is the education of women. This has caused all kinds of problems of disobedience, dissent and division, and it's time to put an end to it. Further theological education of women should be banned, and no woman with tertiary qualifications should be allowed to write or speak publicly. This done, in a generation we'll return to the prelapsarian Eden we lived in before Vatican II. (By the way, can anyone remember that Eden? The details are vague in my mind, though I was there. Perhaps I shouldn't have had that brain surgery to remove my own theology degree...) Sorry for the heavy and lumbering sarcasm - I'm not feeling particularly gruntled at the moment!

Perhaps the key words are :

Perhaps the key words are : "their rightful place in the world and the church." Maybe the definition of that statement by the bishops and by the women is different. We Catholics are so great with words, but walking the walk seems to be beyond us.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <font> <swf> <swf list>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You may use <swf file="song.mp3"> to display Flash files inline

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This is prove you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions. Solve the simple math problem.
7 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.