Twitter - Facebook - Email Alerts - RSS
Bishops on health care: Abortion out, immigrants in
WASHINGTON -- As a Senate committee considered a range of amendments on many of the same issues, bishops representing three committees of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops called on senators to insist that any final health reform bill exclude mandated coverage of abortion, protect conscience rights, safeguard the health of immigrants and protect "the life, dignity and health of all."
In a Sept. 30 letter to members of the Senate, the three bishops also said affordability should be a major consideration, so that health reform would be "truly universal and genuinely affordable."
The letter was signed by Bishop William F. Murphy of Rockville Centre, N.Y., chairman of the Committee on Domestic Justice and Human Development; Cardinal Justin Rigali of Philadelphia, chairman of the Committee on Pro-Life Activities; and Bishop John C. Wester of Salt Lake City, chairman of the Committee on Migration.
The bishops made their comments as the Senate Finance Committee continued its markup of the health reform plan proposed by Sen. Max Baucus, D-Mont., the committee chairman. By a 13-10 vote Sept. 30, the committee rejected an amendment proposed by Sen. Orrin G. Hatch, R-Utah, that would have required women who wanted coverage for abortions to purchase it and pay for it separately.
The committee also turned down a proposal by Sen. Charles E. Grassley, R-Iowa, that would have required those applying for Medicaid or a children's health insurance program to present a photo ID. Sen. Jon Kyl, R-Ariz., offered a similar amendment that would have required a photo ID with applications for tax-credit subsidies for health insurance.
In their letter, the bishops said none of the health reform proposals considered in committee, including the Baucus bill, has "met President (Barack) Obama's challenge of barring use of federal dollars for abortion and maintaining current conscience laws."
"These deficiencies must be corrected," they added.
In his Sept. 9 address to a joint session of Congress on health care reform, Obama said, "Under our plan, no federal dollars will be used to fund abortions, and federal conscience laws will remain in place."
On immigrants, the bishops' letter suggested several "effective ways to safeguard the health of immigrants, their children and all of society," including:
-- "An adequate safety net for those who remain uncovered."
-- Elimination of the five-year waiting period before legal immigrants can enroll in Medicaid.
-- An end to barriers, such as waiting periods to obtain subsidies, when immigrants seek to obtain private health insurance.
-- Health coverage of pregnant women giving birth to U.S. citizen children, no matter what the women's legal status.
"Immigrants pay the same taxes as citizens, and their health needs cannot be ignored," the bishops said. "Leaving them outside a reformed system is both unfair and unwise."
On the issue of affordability, the USCCB letter said the debate over health care reforms "must begin with the principle that decent health care is not a privilege, but a right and a requirement to protect the life and dignity of every person."
Health coverage should not be dependent on an individual's "stage of life, where or whether they or their parents work, how much they earn, where they live or where they were born," the bishops said.
But for lower-income families, "significant premiums and cost-sharing charges can serve as barriers to obtaining coverage or seeing a doctor," they added.
The Baucus bill received specific criticism on affordability from the bishops, who said it could require families living just above the federal poverty line to pay up to 25 percent of their income on out-of-pocket health care costs.
"We urge Congress to limit premiums or to exempt families earning less than 200 percent of the federal poverty level from monthly premiums," the bishops said. "We also recommend limiting co-payments and other costs which could discourage needed care. ... We support the increase in eligibility levels in Medicaid to no less than 135 percent of the federal poverty level for all citizens and immigrants residing lawfully in the United States."
In 2009, the federal poverty level for a family of four in the continental United States was $22,050.
In their letter, the bishops reminded senators that "health care choices are not just political, technical or economic, but also moral."
"This legislation is about life and death, who can take their children to the doctor and who cannot, who can afford decent health care coverage and who are left to fend for themselves," they added. "Health care reform especially needs to protect those at the beginning of life and at its end, the most vulnerable and the voiceless."




The only point the bishops
The only point the bishops should have made, but didn't, is that there is no reason for the health reform to include the insurance industry. Insurance is neither the only nor the best way to make sure that everyone gets affordable health care. Insurance protects financial assets, not health.
You are correct Marie. When
You are correct Marie. When Senator Grassley made the remark the other day that "a government run plan will ultimately force private insurers out of business" you can easily see what side his bread his buttered on. From 2003-2008, three of the five top industries who contributed to the Senator were in health care. And those contributions totaled $1,809,942.00 (Center for Responsive Politics, on the web- www.opensecrets.org). The principle concern of any health care reform should be the people, and how best to provide affordable health care to all. What value do the insurance companies bring to the table? Marie has answered that question very well, and yet people who have insurance can still end up filing for bankruptcy. So what value do they really have?
Peace and blessings.
What kind of immigrants are
What kind of immigrants are the bishops talking about anyway, legal or illegal? Of course legal immigrants should be included in the health care plans. Of course illegal immigrants should not be.
It always makes me laugh when people are talking about the American bishops as Republicans, to me they are warmed over Marxists like Paul VI, the worst Pope of the modern era! Although that was more true in the Bernadin/Weakland era, it is still true now.
God's design for humanity in economic affairs is the free market. The invisible hand in the market place which Adam Smith spoke of is divine providence.
I don't think that from the
I don't think that from the bishop's point of view that illegal immigrants should be excluded from receiving health care at a price they can afford. However, as a practical matter, illegal immigrants are unlikely to come forward to enroll in a national health care program.
God's design for humanity, by your reasoning, would be for it to do nothing but tolerate inhumanity because God will intervene when it gets too bad. There really is no such thing as a free market. The market is a set of rules agreed upon by the power players. They call it free when the rules do not give one of them an advantage over another of them, but it has absolutely no regard for those who are not part of the game at that level.
All illegal immigrants should
All illegal immigrants should be arrested & deported after spending six months in jail. This will be after Obama issues a proclamation that all illegals have six months in which they will have complete immunity from prosecution if they come forward and agree to return to their home country. That is paulte's solution to the problem.
The free market- God's
The free market- God's design? C'mon - give the Deity a break. He already gets blamed for floods, hurricanes, young children dying of cancer and the Cubs' 100-year drought. Now you want to blame Him for capitalism, too? I don't recall reading the part of the OT where the Lord asked Moses to set up the first commodity exchange. Who removed "Blessed are the sellers of derivatives" from the final draft of the Sermon on the Mount?
I know that capitalists have always wanted to inherit the "divine right" that they took away from the kings, but this is a bit much.
Again we see bishops exposing
Again we see bishops exposing their Ultra Liberal Socialist agenda with this blather about health care, aliens and the "rights" of poor (lazy) people. What about the rights of Affluent Anglo Americans? Who speaks for us? Our ancestors spoke ENGLISH and built our Free Market Society. Sadly we seem to have only a handful of Faithful Bishops who understand the church's obligation to preserve our Capitalist Christian Way of Life against the Socialist Godless Agenda of Obama and other Aliens, Tree Huggers and America Haters who seek to destroy us. I dare anyone to show me where the Bible says anything about health insurance! It's simply a convenient excuse to raise taxes on those of us who are Productive Members of Society and are very satisfied with our current Free Marklet health care system. Aliens--not only illegals but all of them--need to go. They are what's wrong with America, those strange brown people jabbering in foreign tongues and robbing Real Americans of lucrative jobs. Aliens have cornered the market on cow pokes, rest room attendants, cab drivers, fruit pickers and slaughter house workers. They are taking over the economy! Aliens are the cause of our problems! Throw them out and prosperity will return for Real Americans.
Psst, Authentically Orthodox,
Psst, Authentically Orthodox, but just who are the REAL Americans? I am a first generation American, and my parents spoke Italian. Does that make them or me less an American than one with English-speaking ancestors? Actually we are the interlopers-ask the Native Americans. Are you for real, or is this an audition to become a writer for Stephen Colbert? If so, it's pretty good, otherwise, you really need some help, and soon. I will pray for you.
Peace and blessings.
AO, You've pretty well stated
AO,
You've pretty well stated the capitalist's argument for denying health care to illegal aliens. I just fail to see where your philosophy overlaps at all with Christianity.
By the way, some time you must tell us all what marvelous thing you did in order to deserve to be born in the US - that one brilliant moment of accomplishment from your infancy that made you superior to all the folks who come here, any way they can, looking for a better deal for themselves and their families.
May I humbly submit that you
May I humbly submit that you are mistaken about some facets of the illegal immigrant healthcare issue. Extending health insurance coverage to every single person who manages to enter the United States - legally or otherwise - would do nothing more than create the largest motive POSSIBLE (!!) for more and more illegal immigrants to enter the country en masse in addition to the 10,000,000 - 12,000,000who are already here, AND overwhelm every aspect of our medical system. I agree that as a society it is our moral obligation to care for ANY human being who needs immediate medical attention. This has been understood and practiced nation-wide for quite some time. Emergency Rooms in the United States treat every single person who walks through the door to the best of their ability regardless of the patient's legal status, and shall continue to be practiced on pain of legal action.
The question that we must ask ourselves is whether or not our intent/goal is to provide health CARE to illegal immigrants, or do we want to provide health INSURANCE to them? Providing health CARE is what is important. The promise of free health INSURANCE to anyone who can make their way across the Rio Grande, will do nothing more than act as the largest lure imaginable for would be illegal immigrants, thus resulting in more and more people trying to enter the country by any means possible. This will only take a bad situation and expand it into an all-out catastrophe.
Post new comment