NCR on Kindle - NCR classifieds - YouTube - Twitter - Facebook - Email Alerts - RSS
Twenty nuclear weapons activists found guilty
Convictions come after Vatican diplomat calls weapons 'no longer morally justified'
Jul. 20, 2011KANSAS CITY, Mo. -- Twenty peace activists opposing the country’s first new nuclear weapons facility in 33 years were found guilty of trespass yesterday for a May action which saw 53 arrested for a nonviolent action here.
But the convictions, handed down by Municipal Judge Elena Franco, were just part of a two-hour court drama that saw activists place their action in the context of the continued funding of U.S. nuclear weapons and a recent statement by a key Vatican diplomat questioning nuclear deterrence.
Speaking in Kansas City July 1, Archbishop Francis Chullikatt, the Vatican’s ambassador to the U.N., said “there is no justification today for the continued maintenance of nuclear weapons.”
Steve Jacobs, one of those convicted yesterday, echoed the archbishop’s words in a statement before Franco.
“Catholic bishops tell us these weapons are immoral because if used they will continue to kill the innocent year after year from the effects of nuclear fallout and contamination,” said Jacobs, a member of the Columbia, Mo. Catholic Worker community.
“I am guilty of believing them.”
Jacobs and the other 52 activists were arrested May 2 after blocking the gate to the construction site for the new nuclear facility, which is to replace an existing one here that makes approximately 85 percent of the non-nuclear components for the U.S. nuclear arsenal. It is one of three major new nuclear weapons facilities planned in the U.S., and its construction is part of an investment of $80 billion in the arsenal announced by President Obama last year.
Before their arrests, protestors walked onto the main road leading onto the Kansas City construction site and formed a circle around a construction vehicle. After about ten minutes there, officers arrested them one by one.
Fifteen of those convicted yesterday -- which included Catholic Workers from as far away as Pittsburgh, Penn., and a number of members of religious congregations -- pleaded guilty and were sentenced to 25 hours of community service, a suspended sentence of 10 days in jail, and two years probation for the action.
Four others who pleaded guilty received fines of $500, along with court costs. Another who pleaded guilty, Nicholas Pickrell, was sentenced to two days in jail after he told Franco that he would not pay a fine, or complete community service, because he “lives with the poor” and “practices community service every day.”
Preview NCR's Family Life Issue
Watch this video from NCR Editor Dennis Coday for highlights from our annual Family Life special section.

You won't find these articles on our website. Subscribe now to receive all the content from each biweekly issue.
Five pleaded not guilty and were given a Sept. 28 trial date.
Before issuing one of the convictions yesterday, Franco told the defendants they were “preaching to the choir.”
In his statement before the court, Frank Cordaro, a member of the Des Moines Catholic Worker community, told Franco that he would not pay any fines levied against him as a way to be open to jail time to “stand in solidarity with the poor,” who, he said, were disproportionately represented in prison populations.
Responding that she had been a defense lawyer before becoming a judge, Franco told Cordaro she had lobbied to increase funding for legal services to the mentally ill and wished activists would work within legal means to express their concerns.
“If you would connect with us,” said Franco, “we would connect with you.”
As she announced Cordaro’s sentence -- $500 fine, to be paid within 90 days -- Franco smiled and, referring to the activist’s unwillingness to pay fines, said “But I’m sure that you’ll eventually be found in contempt of court.”
Cordaro, who has been arrested twice before in actions over the Kansas City facility and has refused to pay fines, held his hands up and replied: “I already am, Your Honor.”
Speaking after the proceedings, Cordaro said he walked way from the courtroom with an understanding that he and Franco “have a lot of common values and concerns.”
While waiting for officers to place him into custody, Pickrell, a member of the local Cherith Brook Catholic Worker community, told NCR he was willing to serve jail time instead of doing community service because “I still don’t feel what I did was wrong.”
“Why would I do community service for something I didn’t think was wrong?” he asked.
The activist, who said this would be his first stint in jail alone -- he and the other 52 activists arrested in May were placed in holding cells together for a number of hours -- also said he saw his time in jail as a “statement of solidarity.”
“People fear jail, yet our guests go regularly in and out of them. So this is just as much an act of solidarity as it is an act of exploration.”
Twenty-three of the activists who did not go before the judge yesterday also had their cases continued to the Sept. 28 date. Five remaining activists didn’t show up for the hearing or request a continuance. Warrants were issued for their arrest.
The May action was part of a series of efforts hosted by local people opposed to the construction of the $673 million nuclear weapons plant, known simply as the Kansas City Plant. Construction is being subsidized by the city with $815 million in municipal bonds.
Activists recently gathered enough signatures for a local ballot measure they say, if passed, would compel the operator of the plant to cease nuclear work in favor of green energy production. Barring legal challenges, it is due to appear on a Nov. 8 ballot.
[Joshua J. McElwee is an NCR staff writer. His e-mail address is jmcelwee@ncronline.org.]
Related reporting from NCR:
- 52 arrested protesting nuclear weapons plant
- Opposing nuclear weapons plant, activists arrested at city meeting
- Activists arrested at nuclear weapons plant groundbreaking
- Kansas City Bishop questions local nuclear weapons plant
- Catholic activists arrested at Kansas City nuclear weapons facility
- Hiroshima Day marked by Kansas City activist sentencing
Editor's Note: For more photos of the May 2 action, take a look at Joshua McElwee's photos in the slideshow below.





I agree in principle with the
I agree in principle with the decision to find them guilty because "trespass" on nuclear sites poses a real threat to our national security... and in fact to the world's security. They should have found a more meaningful and legal way to protest other than criminal trespass.
It's not a nuclear site -
It's not a nuclear site - yet. Right now it's a construction site.
Our Security cannot be based
Our Security cannot be based in fear and enmity. The only security comes from the love that pours into us from the spirit and should pour out of us. Otherwise, we are just masquerading.
Anne, Thanks so much for your
Anne,
Thanks so much for your simple, clear and wonderful words! By the time I read the last sentence I had a lump in my throat and tears in my eyes.
I can't help but think that if Jesus were here, right now, standing before us, HE would say exactly the same!!!
Blessings, and all the best to you and yours--
bob
OMG, Jesus was here!!! YOU stood for HIM. In your great words HE lives among us, AGAIN, NOW, STILL.
When I think of the Theo-Fascism that has so totally consumed our nation and suppressed those of us who think as you do, I am given to tears and deep emotions.
Again, many thanks and all the best--
bob
How exactly does it pose a
How exactly does it pose a "real threat" to national and world security?
Criminal trespass, yes, but a
Criminal trespass, yes, but a "real threat to national security" is frankly absurd.
In May 2011 construction was ongoing for the fabrication and manufacturing building, the central plant and the main office (there are five buildings in the entire project).
The site is still yet a few years away from housing sensitive materials.
Look at aerial views from kcp.com, promo shots on the NNSA flickr feed and JEDunn website and reevaluate the likelihood of what you're suggesting.
Your definition of what constitutes a national security breach is expansive, but I'll give the benefit of the doubt that you are unfamiliar with the details.
You obviously stand with the
You obviously stand with the status-quo and actually have no idea what you are talking about...
It's time for an end to
It's time for an end to 'MAD.' The U.S. public has been kept in the dark about the effects of nuclear weapons. The 'Civil Defense' programs on nuclear preparedness were empty fire extinguishers, and one of several areas about which our govenment lied to us.
Our Catholic Church in
Our Catholic Church in action, at long last, and where was Chaput?
May our God of Peace bless
May our God of Peace bless and protect these highly, truly, faithfully courageous young people in their hard and oppressive pilgrimage ahead
nuclear weapons are the most
nuclear weapons are the most cowardly, immoral and diabolical instruments ever created by man, and only we have used them, and stockpile the greatest number, and continue to build them, even after The Challenge of Peace.
Praise God. I don't agree
Praise God. I don't agree with these folks, but at least they have the courage of their convictions, instead of sitting on their rear ends and simple-minded writing blogs about what everyone else should do.
I appreciated Joshua's
I appreciated Joshua's presence and insightful coverage of this event. My hope is that through such reporting many more will be awakened to the unacceptable and growing dangers, costs, and immorality of nuclear weapons. These weapons are no longer a credible deterrent, and instead are an incentive to their proliferation, which inevitably will lead to horrific consequences--either by accident or design. Humanity must ban these weapons if we and our planet are to survive.
I want to thank all those
I want to thank all those unselfish protestor for their demonstration. I worked at that facility for 32 years, making part for the weapons, also I am a Vietnam Veteran who was assigned to a combat aviation battalion. Yes, I have many emotions on the issue of how to protest the making of those weapons of mass destruction, I do protest. I portest by speaking the truth of what it takes to manufacture the weapons, truth is for step one of production, it harms the environment and the individuals in the production of these weapon. The denial from the government of the human contamination, and the destruction done to the environment is well known. Secretary of Energy Bill Richardson years ago admitted the fault of the government in protecting the workers and the surrounding communities of where weapons are manufactured. I am enternally thankful for those demonstrators that have the commitment and courage to step up and defy this construction project. Kansas Citians do not know the back door, underhanded things that have gone on to make this project happen. The citizens of Kansas City do not know the issues of remediation of the new site is very unclear as it relates to clean up resonsibility. The facility being replaced has decades of clean up issues ahead of it, also a legacy of issues related to the workers and their health, that it is reluctant to deal with in a manner of concern to the workers and the community. I am praying harder than I have ever prayed in my life, even when I was in Vietnam, that the government will realize that these weapon are of NO USE TO HUMANITY, THEY WILL NOT BE USED, THEY ARE NOT A DETERENNCE, THEY ARE A LURE FOR WAR.
The legal challenge mentioned
The legal challenge mentioned in the last paragraph may play out as a cunning dragging-of-the-feet by City Council. Its next action on our ballot initiative against the new nuke-parts plant in KC is posted for the Council's Aug. 25 meeting, the last meeting that month. The problem: if the Council blocks the initiative from the ballot, our lawyer has only a few working days to file a court action to oppose the Council decision. All issues going to the Nov. 8 ballot must be finalized by late August. Mighty forces are arrayed against our ballot initiative, "Production of Nuclear Weapons Components Prohibited." Thanks to our resisters for their bold actions, for their hope!
It would appear today's more
It would appear today's more destructive form of nuclear device is that of the power station assemblage. That beautiful nuclear device in the sky is my favorite.
We need many more people with
We need many more people with the courage to take a stand. All baby boomers grew up with the "threat" of nuclear weapons. It didnt solve a thing! It wont solve a thing! The U.S. should keep their word & start disarming now.
So I see what the punishment
So I see what the punishment is for trespassing, let's see what the punishment is for lying to Federal investigators. I am one the the sick worker that the government witheld information from so I could get proper treatment for my illnesses. The government apologizes for lying, and people died. What kind of sentence does that deserve?
GSA official apologizes as audit finds Bannister agency misled ...
Nov 8, 2010 ... GSA official apologizes as audit finds Bannister agency misled ... “I do apologize on behalf of GSA,” said GSA Regional Administrator Jason Klumb at a ... The report indicates shortly after NBC Action News uncovered the ...
www.nbcactionnews.com/dpp/news/local_news/investigations/gsa-of... - Similarto GSA official apologizes as audit finds Bannister agency misled ...
I disagree with the comment:
I disagree with the comment: "'trespass' on nuclear sites poses a real threat to our national security... and in fact to the world's security. They should have found a more meaningful and legal way to protest other than criminal trespass."
Non-violent resister Steve Jacobs of Columbia, MO said in court yesterday:
"I am guilty of trespass the like a firefighter or a policeman is guilty of trespass when entering onto property in order to prevent a greater crime from occuring. You may believe the danger of nuclear annihilation is not imminent or that building these weapons of mass destruction are legal but I believe that any weapon that indiscriminately kills hundreds of thousands of innocents along with those who are targeted are immoral and have no right to exist. Creating more makes their use more imminent so we have a duty to stop their production now."
Criminal trespass is a symbolically appropriate and safe protest option in this case. One entrance to the nuclear plant construction site was blocked for about 30 minutes; there was no imminent risk to national security and world security because of their actions. Rather, it is the production of new nuclear weapons that puts our country and world at greater risk.
So they won't feel left
So they won't feel left out--
The popes Republicans must be screaming their USUAL reply to these kinds of issues and EVERY other evil they do, for that matter: abortion, abortion, abortion.
Okay, now paulte, CWG, pete the greek, Southern Catholic, Texas and a few others can feel they have been represented. I guess they, the pope and most of the hierarchs feel they are just being realistic, in a real world.
Surely, they streeeetch(read that as twist) the teachings of Jesus Christ and the laws of God(Commandments)in a Rovian(Karl, Frank Luntz and Lee Atwater) way and far beyond ALL recognition.
But they have BIG Business and BIG Religion on their side. So does Satan!
I say: may GOD the Holy Spirit bless these protesters.
This is fantastic! Thank you,
This is fantastic! Thank you, ncr, for this story and please continue to cover any developments!
Thank you for your
Thank you for your informative article about the nuclear weapons activists. I attended the court hearings on Tuesday and have to credit these activists for their courage. When the law actively supports a project, which directly contradicts human welfare and justice, it is a matter of conscience to make a stand.
When the prosecution urged a higher fee for an activist because of the “costs to the city,” I wondered how this could possibly compare with the cost of $700 million in municipal bonds to purchase “blighted” agricultural land for about $26,000 an acre (well over the going price of $2,000 to $4,000 an acre). I also wondered how building a nuclear weapons parts plant – an earlier version of which has polluted the environment and likely caused cancers and other occupational exposure illness among workers – could possibly be seen to be “necessary in the interest of the public, health safety, morals or welfare…” of the residents of the city as required by state law for such bonds?
I am grateful to these people for speaking out, and I am grateful to the National Catholic Reporter for covering this issue.
Whether Mr. Pickrell thinks
Whether Mr. Pickrell thinks he did nothing wrong is irrelevant. He broke the law by committing criminal trespass. Frankly, he should be glad that he got off as light as he and his co-conspirators did. Such a light consequence is unlikely to provide incentive for him and others like him to obey the law in the future.
These attempts to hearken back to the "good old days" of the 1960s protests is cute, but even the most liberal President in more than 40 years believes that these weapons are vital to the national security of the United States. The lesson we can draw from this is that radicals simply do not live in the real world.
Catholic Worker movement
Catholic Worker movement rocks!! My prayers go out to all the peacemakers out there!
Post new comment