NCR on Kindle - NCR classifieds - YouTube - Twitter - Facebook - Email Alerts - RSS
Obama disarmament speech 'a world changing moment'
Promise of unprecedented change on most dangerous world threat
Apr. 07, 2009
In a remarkable speech for any American leader,President Obama, speaking in Prague on April 5, 2009, provided new hope for a world free of nuclear weapons.
“I state clearly and with conviction,” he said, “America’s commitment to seek the peace and security of a world without nuclear weapons.” He told his audience that America, as the only country to have used nuclear weapons, “has a moral responsibility to act.”
For many years the Nuclear Age Peace Foundation has been calling for US leadership for a nuclear weapons-free world, based on the understanding that if the US does not lead, significant progress will not be possible. For the past two presidential terms this leadership has been largely lacking.
During the George W. Bush presidency, the US was the leading obstacle to nuclear disarmament. Now, with President Obama, there is a dramatic shift and the goal of US leadership for a nuclear weapons-free world that once seemed far distant, if not impossible, appears at hand.
President Obama’s speech in Prague was a world changing moment, a promise of unprecedented historical change on the most profoundly dangerous issue confronting not only America but the world. In this speech he recognized the imperative for our common security of eliminating nuclear weapons and of America’s unique moral responsibility to lead this effort.
He made it clear that while America cannot do it alone, it will lead by its actions. He called for “concrete steps,” including reducing the role of nuclear weapons in US national security strategy and urging other nuclear weapons states to do the same, reducing the number of nuclear weapons in its arsenal, working aggressively for US ratification of the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty, seeking a new treaty to end production of fissile materials for weapons, strengthening the Non-Proliferation Treaty, creating an international fuel bank to reduce the risks of proliferation, assuring that nuclear weapons will not be acquired by terrorists, and leading an international effort to gain control of vulnerable nuclear materials throughout the world within four years.
President Obama recognized that a world without nuclear weapons “will not be reached quickly.” He cautioned that such a world may not occur within his lifetime, and that achieving it will require “patience and persistence.” But this was not a speech about timeframes or deadlines. It was a speech setting forth a much needed vision and providing a promise of US leadership. He has taken an important step toward the goal of a nuclear weapons-free world by articulating this vision and committing to work toward it. Now a more comprehensive plan must be formulated and implemented.
Preview NCR's Family Life Issue
Watch this video from NCR Editor Dennis Coday for highlights from our annual Family Life special section.

You won't find these articles on our website. Subscribe now to receive all the content from each biweekly issue.
With the political will that President Obama has provided, it is possible that we could move far more rapidly toward a world of zero nuclear weapons than could previously be imagined. Political will and US leadership have been the most significant missing elements for achieving a world free of nuclear weapons. Now that these elements are in place, we may be surprised by how quickly the planning and implementation process can proceed toward the total global elimination of these unconscionable weapons.
President Obama is a man of great vision, a leader that sees beyond the horizon. When he encounters a problem requiring change, he addresses it and proposes solutions. His leadership on the issue of a nuclear weapons-free world comes none too soon. In his speech, he has faced the threat of nuclear weapons squarely. The vision and the initial steps toward achieving it that he has articulated deserve our strong support.
As President Obama noted, there will be many who will say that it cannot be done. But these naysayers cannot steal the future from those who seek a world free of nuclear threat or those committed to building a world at peace. The President will need the American people standing with him and saying, “Yes, we can.”
David Krieger is President of the Nuclear Age Peace Foundation.





The president knows this wont
The president knows this wont work. He makes vague promises for the distant future, to distract us from his wars.
A fatal flaw is outfits like North Korea. Say they build an atomic bomb, for blackmailing the Japs. They've been our best friends, for 60 years. How do we help them? Send the infantry against an atomic bomb?
Chaynes, so you are saying
Chaynes, so you are saying that the US and every other country should just continue building up nuclear arms without restraint?
"He makes vague promises for the distant future, to distract us from his wars?"
Please explain yourself and what you mean by "distract us from his wars" because I have no idea what you are talking about. It really sounds like pure speculation and based in fear from your demonization of Obama than from any real truth.
It seems to me the only fatal flaw is the type of reasoning that rejects working for peace, which rejects the Holy Spirit, rejects leaders that want to eliminate a terrible threat to us all which is nuclear weapons.
You say "the type of
You say "the type of reasoning that refects working for peace, which refects the Holy Spirit"? Are you serious? I know you're not referring to the Biblical Holy Spirit that comes upon one who receives Christ. Have you ever read your Bible? Jesus said in Matthew 10:34, "Do not suppose that I come to bring peace to the earth. I do not come to bring peace, but a sword".In Luke 12:49 Jesus says, "I have come to bring fire on the earth (not peace), and how I wish it were already kindled! But I have a baptism to undergo, and how distressed I am until it is completed!" Jesus is distressed that His vengence on the wicked of the earth is not quick enough for Him. God is not a radical for either side (righteous or wicked), He is equally divided for both. He LOVES righteousness, and will bring peace and eternal life to His own. God HATES wickedness, and will punish the wicked with a feirceness no human can imagine. Don't be so arrogent as to assume you know the heart of the President or ANYONE else for that matter. Even those who beleive they are saved Christians will go to hell. Jesus says in Matthew 7:21 "Not everyone who says to me, 'Lord, Lord,' will enter the kingdom of heaven, but only he who does the will of my Father who is in heaven. 22Many will say to me on that day (of judgment), 'Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name, and in your name drive out demons and perform many miracles?' 23Then I will tell them plainly, 'I never knew you. Away from me, you evildoers!' These were not ppl we would have thought to be wicked. He said they prophesied in Jesus name and performed miracles in His name and even called Him Lord, However only Jesus knew their hearts and called them evildoers. So do not think for one second that you know of someone b/c they promise to bring peace to the world. The Bible also prophesies as to the one who comes claiming peace. That person is known in Revelation as the AntiChrist. If I were you, I'd pull out my Bible asap and do some reading.
I wouldn't think that the
I wouldn't think that the President's ideas on disarmament would be quite as naive and simplistic as yours. I also don't think he'd be using the term, "Japs".
Its really unfair to say that
Its really unfair to say that "...the George W. Bush presidency, the US was the leading obstacle to nuclear disarmament..". It is simply not an accurate statement. Be careful of swallowing all of the political rhetoric coming out of the current Administration. Beware of "received" wisdom from any political leader of every stripe. Look in to the facts for yourself. Try taking North Korea and Iran nuclear situation as a starting point and work back to Hiroshima....come to your own conclusion. Finally, don't get the impression that I think that Bush was a saint. What I am saying is think for yourself. Sadly, our news sources and our academics are too polarized. Pray always! in Christ...
Anonymous, then what did
Anonymous, then what did George W. Bush do about nuclear disarmament? Please cite for us here documentation of GW Bush's specific actions regarding US nuclear disarmament.
As much as I enjoy and
As much as I enjoy and respect the hard work of the good folks at NCR, I have to disagree entirely with the premise of this article. It is irresponsible, incorrect, and downright naive to argue that under any previous administration it was the United States that was the greatest obstacle to nuclear disarmament.
The greatest obstacle isn't the United States, it's those rogue nations and terrorist organizations who will gladly use a nuclear device if they get the opportunity. And even if they refrain from using it, to possess such a weapon will give them a literal, explosive "bully pulpit" from which to wield power and influence.
Imagine North Korea and Iran with nukes. They are close. Iranian observers even witnessed the recent launch in North Korea from nearby the launch pad. With nuclear threatening power, how will THEY change the world? Whom will they bully into sending terrorists or troops into areas of tension? Will the people of the United States stand quietly by as we sing "Kumbaya" and speak about our love for peace? Do we owe it to our friends and even to our own citizens to remain a power for good? And, if so, if we unilaterally disarm and continue to look the other way as nukes are proliferated among dangerous regimes, are we caring for our citizenry or that of those other nations that are our friends?
Speeches don't change the
Speeches don't change the world. Actions change the world.
Post new comment