Signs of a dawning new era of lay initiative

Living the Catholic faith I

Apr. 24, 2009
Worshipers stream into the new Cathedral of Christ the Light during the dedication ceremony in Oakland, Calif., Sept. 25, 2008. (CNS/Greg Tarczynski)

For decades, sociologists have tracked the trends of American Catholics in demographics, religious behavior and attitudes toward traditional values and church authority.

In 1997, James Davidson and colleagues identified three cohorts of Catholics -- pre-Vatican II, Vatican II and post-Vatican II -- each with its characteristic set of religious tendencies. Likewise, for 30 years William D'Antonio and his colleagues traced changes in attitudes and behavior among Roman Catholics. These studies have generated a relatively clear and consistent picture of U.S. Catholics. In general, they are becoming more autonomous, less observant of traditional practices and more like self-interested consumers of pastoral goods.

However, beneath the surface, what do these studies really mean? Or better, what does it feel like to live out of these categories in the concrete? Jerome Baggett, professor of religion and society at the Jesuit School of Theology in Berkeley, decided to try to find that out by interviewing almost 300 Catholic parishioners in six parishes in California's San Francisco-Oakland area. These six parishes provide a diversity of race, class and religious attitudes that mirrors remarkably well the church's national profile.

SENSE OF THE FAITHFUL: HOW AMERICAN CATHOLICS LIVE THEIR FAITH By Jerome P. Baggett (Oxford University Press, $29.95)SENSE OF THE FAITHFUL: HOW AMERICAN CATHOLICS LIVE THEIR FAITH By Jerome P. Baggett (Oxford University Press, $29.95) For instance, one parish has become a haven for homosexual Catholics, another a base for the traditionalist right; several of these parishes are models of multicultural diversity, and two of them include significant upper-middle- class and upper-class parishioners.

Baggett chose to interview people who are strongly attached to these parishes, hoping to appreciate how these distinct communities understand and live their ways of being Catholic.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Read another review of this book: American Catholics, diverse and holy
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Preview NCR's Family Life Issue

Watch this video from NCR Editor Dennis Coday for highlights from our annual Family Life special section.

You won't find these articles on our website. Subscribe now to receive all the content from each biweekly issue.

While the national surveys referred to above suggest a picture of the church rent by painful disunity and polarization, Baggett's study, by contrast, provides sketches of parishes that develop meaningful, life-giving ministries for the people who find their spiritual home there. In part, this effect is explained by the voluntary choice of a congenial pastoral setting by people who are aware of the cultural and ideological variety available to them and who search for a place that fits their own idea of sacramental and community life.

This general picture is refined by Baggett's descriptions of "hometown parishes" where caring and emotional support are the attractive element, "multicultural parishes" that "cushion the pain" of being outsiders for those who are still finding their way in an unfamiliar culture, or "oppositional parishes" where a resistance to social wrongs provides the motivation for belonging. It is noteworthy that the two extreme examples of the gay church, on the one hand, and the traditionalist parish, on the other, are both "oppositional" from the perspective of sociological analysis -- the first opposing homophobia and the second irreverence.

Baggett hopes that the perspectives of those interviewed will stimulate further research into the actual pastoral scene and into the theological challenges of their ideas. He describes these respondents as "negotiating" their own proper place within the pastoral environment and selectively appropriating the religious culture that they find available to them. The faithful in these six parish settings seem to understand church membership as principally "therapeutic," seeking above all personal meaning and spiritual comfort for themselves without much awareness of their potential role as witnesses or evangelists of a Christian life that is symbolic of the kingdom of God.

Maybe the strongest single contribution of this book is Baggett's chapter about the conundrum of the stillbirth of Catholic social teaching in the U.S. church. He explains this in terms of "civic underachieving," shown by Catholics' above-average socioeconomic status but notorious low levels of giving and volunteering; in terms of "civic narrowing" through the inward focus of activities and moral concerns in parishes; and "civic silencing," illustrated by the clergy's reticence to alienate parishioners by speaking out on delicate, demanding or controversial social issues.

I have one regret about the author's approach. Nowhere does a discussion of age cohorts enter significantly into his analysis of social factors. His interview subjects are largely middle-aged and elderly, which does not diminish the cogency of the views they express, but does not say enough about the future of these communities.

Nevertheless, this careful, highly readable and fascinating book is a treasure for our moment of pastoral evolution. It presents and explains valuable sociological ideas that allow for the reframing of behaviors and attitudes in terms of cultural influences and social forces.

Baggett claims correctly, I believe, that the faithful today are different in how they practice their faith, but are not significantly less religious than their American Catholic ancestors. In his view, we are witnessing the end of an era of "devotional Catholicism" marked by nostalgia and authoritarianism, and the onset of a new era of lay initiative that will be marked by their critical appropriation of the Catholic tradition and a lively and creative autonomy.

Whether this prospect is correct or not, Baggett's thoughtful analysis of the lives of the faithful in six Catholic parishes representative of the national pastoral landscape provides depth and texture for reflecting on the U.S. pastoral scene that will interest any reader and critically inform the church's leadership.

Dominican Fr. Paul Philibert is a resident scholar at the Collegeville Institute at St. John's University in Minnesota.

I would question whether

I would question whether these surveyed parishes truly represent the "national pastoral landscape" -- What about the thousands of parishes that are NOT "upper" middle class and "upper" class? What would those parishes reveal??

Pax. Aristophilos

That is just wonderful- now

That is just wonderful- now all I need is a book about how "American catholics" make known their dislike of the USA governmental policies at home and abroad that discriminate against catholics and promote anti-catholic ideas. The anti-catholics are very well organized and have been since the time of Martin Luther and Henry VIII have supported a world -wide effort in an attempt to destroy The Church, ie, conquest of america by force of arms, WWI, WWII, This is especially evident today in Latin and South America. One group, the Mormons claim to have more Mormons in South America than there are in the USA and publicly not a word of dissent or complaint is heard. Why?
Keep up your great reporting!
John Vondra

I take the position that the

I take the position that the Church was founded by Christ-God come in the flesh. That Jesus is the Head of the Church and that the Pope together with the Magisterium was provided to His Church to shepherd His people (flock). That primarily, the Church is gift. That it is composed of Church Militant, Church Suffering, and Church Triumphant. Therefore to break down the Church in to the "American" Church, or the "English" Church is simply wrong given what the Church actually is. Beyond that, mystically the Body of Christ is the Church.

Living and ministering in the

Living and ministering in the Bay Area I am familiar with the two parishes one gay and the other taditionalist mentioned . What we experience in the more progressive and more so in the gay parishes is the presence of self appointed 'temple police' who report to the chancery and to their traditional movements any deviations in what they deem are the errors in liturgy and orthodoxy..This practice is demoralizing to parish staff and must be stamped out if the church is survive..
The progressives do not have 'temple police'..

Hi, Ed, I don't know if this

Hi, Ed,

I don't know if this will be of any consolation to you or not,
but the "temple police" are all over the world. If you click onto
Australian catholic websites---they will write of the same problems.

The "temple police" harken back to a day when the Church resisted
human nature because human nature was seen as 'ungodly'.

And they dream about church life in the "good old days" but have forgotten
about all the pain inflicted on people when they came to confession
and were dealt with harshly by confessors.

The temple police also long for the good old days when, Catholics were taught to avoid contat with Protestants and Jews, out of the fear that association with them, discussing 'religion' with them might taint the Catholic somehow.

Homosexuals were (and in the minds of many still are) among the lowest class of persons and were/are guilty of unspeakable sins and vices which cannot be be forgiven easily.

How they love one another and express that love throught the gift of sexuality was/is nover a serious consideration for the Church. It focus, instead, on its rulings that such persons are simply disordered human beings.

And also, unmarried pregnant women were/are given very little slack and often trucked off to special "homes" for them.

Ah, yes, and the temple police still believe in all of the less-than-glorious guilt (that the truly orthodox Catholics always wear like a religious medal).

These people feel that unless everyone understands the Church with their understanding---that somehow, the Holy Spirit blowing on the sails of the Barque of Peter, will cease to blow. Gee, we can't have Catholic worship seem to resemble Protestant worship (even though what Luther had originally wanted for the Church in the sixteenth century is probably what the Church really needs today).

I would further recommed that

I would further recommed that the author take guidance from the recent talk that Pope Benedict made to the Congregation of Clergy Plenary Meeting on St Patrick's Day. It really addresses the heart of the matter-Eucharist. Notably this following:

"As Church and as priests we proclaim Jesus of Nazareth Lord and Christ, crucified and resurrected, sovereign of time and history, in the joyful certainty that this truth coincides with the profoundest hopes of the human heart. In the mystery of the Incarnation of the Word, namely, in the fact that God became a man like us, is both the content as well as the method of the Christian proclamation. The mission has here its propellant center: precisely in Jesus Christ. The centrality of Christ brings with it the correct appreciation of the ministerial priesthood, without which neither the Eucharist nor, consequently, the mission and the Church herself would exist. In this connection it is necessary to watch so that the "new structures" of pastoral organizations are not thought out for a time in which the ordained ministry is "undervalued," starting from an erroneous interpretation of the correct promotion of the laity, because in such a case the premises would be established for an ultimate dissolution of the ministerial priesthood and the eventual presumed "solutions" would coincide dramatically with the real causes of the current problems linked to the ministry."

More info is available at: http://www.zenit.org/article-25391?l=english

Happy Easter! Christ is Risen. Alleluia! Alleluia!

Dear, dear Snowdrop, that

Dear, dear Snowdrop, that which is morally bankrupt cannot offer moral guidance, even on the ministerial priesthood. It is not a question of how ministerial priesthood functions in the church. It is, however, a question of idolatry regarding that same priesthood and the corresponding celibacy. This idolatry has caused so much sinfulness and moral degradation in the church. This is the reason why these other faith communities look for a true and honest way to celebrate the risen Christ. Surely you see that, Snowdrop, or would if you would stop simply repeating what the church says and think about it for yourself. Use the reason that God gave you.

Religious pluralism WITHIN

Religious pluralism WITHIN the Roman Catholic Church has always been a great strength, not something to be feared, fettered or ferreted out. This was masterfully constructed on an extra-mural, ecumenical level by Fr. Philibert's own Parisian confrere Yves Congar, O.P. in his book DIVERSITY AND COMMUNION.

My dear mother taught me a

My dear mother taught me a wise thing that applies both to spirituality, and to mathematics:
REDUCE THINGS TO THEIR SIMPLEST LEVEL, WHEN YOU NEED CLARITY IN COMPREHENSION.

1. Jesus, as our role model, actually practiced a lot of pluralism. He talked to a Samaritan woman (doubly going against the social "rules" of his time: a Samaritan "oooh," and a woman double "oooh".) And then...Jesus went so far as to talk to the Samaritan woman ALONE at the well. SCANDAL: So God talked to a woman in private, at a well while she was on-task getting water.
2. Now that that's settled, next: The "less-than-glorious guilt" comment is too funny, good job LittleBear in nailing it!
3. Thanks Craig McKee for the great reference to a worthy tome in this discussion: DIVERSITY AND COMMUNION.
4. Last and oh-so-very not least: The quote on Eucharist by Snowdrop (which I don't have time to look up, but I will give Snowdrop lots of credit for, for patiently typing up. Yes, I do know who wrote it.) It's a good enough quote, the only problem is, face it people, it's TOO WORDY, triple "oooh".

Post new comment

NCR Comment code:

  1. Be respectful. Do not attack the writer. Take on the idea, not the messenger.
  2. Use appropriate language. Avoid vulgarities and slurs.
  3. Keep to the point. Deliberate digressions don't aid the discussion.

For more detailed guidelines, visit our User Guidelines page.

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
(if you have one; if not, leave this blank)
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <font> <swf> <swf list>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You may use <swf file="song.mp3"> to display Flash files inline

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This is to prove you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.