Does U.S. culture really care about 'family values'?

Apr. 27, 2009
Boxes of breakfast cereal featuring “High School Musical” and “Hannah Montana” characters on supermarket shelves (NCR photo/Toni-Ann Ortiz)
Printer-friendly versionPrinter-friendly versionSend to friendSend to friendPDF versionPDF version

Remember those parenting promises you made before you had children? “I won’t let my kid act up in public” or “I will feed my baby only organic fruits and vegetables” or “I will calmly discipline my child without yelling.”

Mine was: “I will not allow my children to become walking billboards.” No Scooby-Doo T-shirts; no Spider-Man shoes; no Dora the Explorer underpants. That includes Disney diaper bags and Winnie the Pooh shampoo, too.

One day, some seven months into parenthood, after changing my son’s diaper, I realized that blazoned across his little butt was none other than Elmo, the red, furry Muppet of “Tickle Me” fame. How had I missed that his Pampers were already prepping him to be a “Sesame Street” fan?

Apparently children as young as 6 months can recognize logos and brands -- a fact marketers are all too happy to exploit with cradle-to-grave strategies to encourage brand loyalty to their products. But children under 18 are not just future customers, they’re current ones -- spending some $40 million annually and influencing another $700 billion, often by nagging their parents to purchase these cookies or that minivan, according to the Media Education Foundation’s video “Consuming Kids.”

Researchers estimate that children are bombarded with 3,000 commercial messages a day, starting in the morning with their Flintstones Fruity Pebbles served in a Thomas the Tank Engine bowl until evening when they’re tucked under a Little Mermaid comforter clutching an American Girl doll.

What’s wrong with that? After all, my generation had Holly Hobbie and Hot Wheels, and the previous one had Barbie and Superman. But back then it was just dolls and toys, maybe lunchboxes. Today children’s brands are plastered on everything from their Happy Meals to, well, their diapers. And it all sends the message that the most important thing a child can do is buy things. No wonder kids today, when asked what they want to be when they grow up, tend to answer, “Rich.”

Even scarier, they are increasingly getting these commercial messages at school, where they should be learning to be media-literate, not media-saturated. “Drink Coke,” says the cafeteria vending machine. “Eat Skittles,” says the Channel One television commercial. And now, “Watch the WB Network,” says the commercial BusRadio, which has a truly captive audience of kids on their way to and from school.

No wonder America’s soda-chugging, candy-munching, TV-watching young couch potatoes are fatter and even obese, not to mention now suffering from adult-onset diabetes at an earlier and earlier age. But the commercialization of childhood is not just a physical danger to children. It’s an emotional and spiritual one, too.

Youth marketing companies, like Fuse and 4Kids Entertainment, are better versed in child psychology than even the most experienced and best-read parents. These child marketing specialists leverage kids’ natural inclinations to bond to characters and their natural urge to act older than they are -- all to sell products and make money. Does a culture that is willing to deregulate advertising aimed at exploiting children’s developmental differences really care about family values?

Instead, parents are on their own to fight a multimillion-dollar industry. It’s an uphill, countercultural battle that many eventually tire of waging. Too many parents I know who have tried to beat back the onslaught of kids’ consumerism end up throwing up their hands and taking their kids to Disney World and Hannah Montana concerts.

Believe me, I’m as guilty as the next shopper. I’ve purchased Harry Potter and “High School Musical” paraphernalia as Christmas gifts for friends and family. I don’t want to be the uncool godparent. And I have a soft spot for Grover (c’mon -- The Monster at the End of This Book is a classic). But, idealistic new parent that I still am, I hope and pray my husband and I can protect our children from the compulsion to buy things -- and only the coolest and most expensive things at that -- to feel like they are worthy and loved.

Because a habit formed in childhood can last all life long. Parents who don their infants in Baby Gap and purchase only Baby Einstein videos raise toddlers who get the “gimmes” for everything Elmo, who become school-age kids who insist they celebrate their birthday at the (now defunct, thank God!) Club Libby Lu, a makeover salon for “tween” girls as young as 4. Then they become teenagers who wear Abercrombie shirts and Lucky jeans (though they don’t have to wait until adolescence, since Lucky offers baby and toddler jeans for $49-$69).

Eventually they fall in love and decide to marry on a Disney cruise rather than in a church. In a word, they have absorbed the lesson that happiness comes from something outside of themselves, and it ain’t cheap.

Of course, our faith teaches that true happiness comes from something inside, from our relationship with God and others, especially the poor who are too busy trying to survive to celebrate the release of the latest Wii. Our parish communities could and should be a support to parents in teaching this valuable lesson to our children, and many parishes and Catholic schools are. But they can do more. How about raising the topic during baptism or first Communion classes, or at PTA meetings? Maybe offering alternatives to wildly expensive toddler birthday bashes? Or here’s a thought: addressing it from the pulpit now and then.

My son acts up in public all the time, and many of the fruits and veggies he eats are not organic. But I’m going to try to find a new brand of diapers, sans Elmo.

Heidi Schlumpf teaches communications at Aurora University in the Chicago suburbs.

Related Web sites

Media Education Foundation
www.mediaed.org

Commercial Alert
www.commercialalert.org

Campaign for a Commercial-Free Childhood
www.commercialexploitation.org

Its interesting that the

Its interesting that the possibility of responding to the Media challenge "in kind" and putting our own Catholic message out there isn't considered. After all didn't the late Catholic Media Guru Marshall McLuhan nail it when he said "The Medium is the Messsage". Just imagine consenting to the possibility of a Catholic child wearing a t-shirt with "proud Catholic" or "I believe in Jesus". Doesn't even hit the proverbial "Radar" of the typical NCR reader. So well ensconced in their comfortable pews; so drained of their passion that even moderate Catholic witness is deemed inconvenient or even socially offensive. Christ is risen! Alleluia! Alleluia!

Hey Snowdrop. I am a proud

Hey Snowdrop. I am a proud NCR reader. You know nothing about my level of passion. Don't claim that you do.

Peace,
Steve

Heidi is part of our problem.

Heidi is part of our problem. Obviously her friends are the people she rales against. A lot of us common ordinary parents don't anguish over these things because we can ignore them, and there are kids that are turned off by this stuff.
When I was a child there were "heros" like this. Dora the Explorer at least is a girl hero; they didn't have these when I was a girl. Is she anti-Christian? No. Get real Heidi. Stand up for what you believe in quietly in your own family. You won't make a lot of money doing this but you will be happy.

Not really, or we would be

Not really, or we would be more generally willing to pay taxes to support family-favored policies. What we care about is the appearance of caring about family values.

It was 1975 and I gave a talk

It was 1975 and I gave a talk at the Newman Club mass at a Big Ten University. I said very much the same things the writer says in this article. The reaction from the students was that I was some out-of-touch dreamer who needed to return to the real world. People have been saying this for years (My talk was 34 years ago.) but the marketing din goes on and on. Until we see materialism, status, and power as contradicting our true values, a similar article in 2043 will speak a similar message with the same effect as my own.

Jack

Dear Heidi, It's called

Dear Heidi,
It's called buying "generic" rather than by "brands", if you can't make "homemade". A lot cheaper as well...

Home schooling, coupled with

Home schooling, coupled with the elimination of television and other mass media influences, is a great antidote to these problems.

The article and the comments

The article and the comments are both right. The Catholic message is important and can be 'sold' exactly like cereal. Rather than 'proud Catholic' I would happily see the message of Christ. The substance of being truly Christian is the necessary message.

We sent our boy to a Waldorf

We sent our boy to a Waldorf pre-school (we now live in Bolivia, where, alas, there is no Waldorf), and I was constantly struck by the ways in which Catholic schools might learn from Waldorf. While Catholic school communities tend to be made up of families who share a common faith, the values of that faith are not often translated into the kinds of practical lifestyle decisions the author discusses here. With Waldorf, our son was not only surrounded by kids at school who wore no logos and used imagination in their play rather than simply re-creating things they'd seen on tv; we also became part of a community of families who were deeply committed to the same kinds of values at home. No tv. Natural toys. Rituals, play, and stories that instill a sense of the sacred. And among parents, we were able to offer one another moral and practical support in our counter-cultural options. That's one of the main practical roles of a good faith community. From books to parent workshops and to regular volunteering in the classroom, we were offered many ways to learn the whys and hows of Waldorf educational philosophy. My experience suggests that Catholic schools absolutely would and could (and should, in my opinion) be the locus for precisely the kind of media-filtering, culture-countering, values-living community the author hopes for.

By the way, I highly

By the way, I highly recommend the book "The (Magic) Kingdom of God" by Michael Budde for a good explanation of why beating the media marketers at their own game is not such a good idea. In short, it is precisely because "the medium is the message." Ours is a narrative, sacramental, living tradition, and tv and sloganeering run counter to the way the Gospels are necessarily transmitted if they are to remain intact.

You can ignore this

You can ignore this ridiculous stuff, you can turn off the TV, you can read books with your kids, you can discuss news with them, you can pray with them and teach them how to do this. When I was in high school I noticed that the kids that were obviously raised by parents that knew what they were doing and participated in their lives were liked by the teachers. Because they ate the right cereal, wore message shirts? Of course not; it was because these kids had something to say and were great to talk to. You don't have to home school, just "home parent".

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <font> <swf> <swf list>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You may use <swf file="song.mp3"> to display Flash files inline

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This is prove you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions. Solve the simple math problem.
6 + 9 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.