Vatican studies genetically modified crops

Vatican science academy pushes GMOs as safe way of feeding the hungry

May. 18, 2009
More than half of all U.S.-grown soybeans are from genetically modified crops. (CNS file photo)

Rome

Sandwiched amid Pope Benedict XVI's trip to the Middle East and President Barack Obama's commencement address at Notre Dame, a behind-closed-doors "study week" in Rome sponsored by the Pontifical Academy for Sciences on genetically modified organisms, or GMOs, has so far flown largely below radar.

Yet the May 15-19 event could help drive the Vatican toward a pro-GMO stance, disappointing some social justice activists, as well as a cross-section of Catholic bishops and theologians, who see genetically altered crops as risks to the environment and human health as well as a boondoggle for giant agribusiness corporations.

To date, the Vatican has not taken an official position on GMOs. In recent years, both pro- and anti-GMO forces have clamored for Vatican support, on the theory that a statement could be crucial in framing moral debate.

The "study week" is unlikely to produce immediate conclusions, and the Academy for Sciences is essentially a think tank that does not issue authoritative church teaching. Nonetheless, the thrust of the event seems to mobilize support for GMOs as a safe way of combating poverty, feeding the hungry, and protecting the environment.

Read Rich Heffern's backgrounder What are GMO foods?.

The driving force behind the study week is Ingo Potrykus, a German-born scientist credited with being the inventor of "golden rice," a genetically modified rice plant which produces high levels of a precursor to vitamin A. Proponents claim that "golden rice" could save up to a million lives a year, mostly in the developing world, from illnesses due to vitamin A deficiency, but others charge its benefits have been over-sold. Potrykus is a Catholic and a member of the Academy of Sciences.

The formal title of the study week is "Transgenic Plants for Food Security in the Context of Development," which is taking place at the headquarters of the Pontifical Academy for Sciences in the Vatican's Casina Pio IV.

Well before the event even began, it stirred contrasting reactions.

"Spinwatch," an independent body in the United Kingdom that monitors the role of public relations, has described the study week as a "total farce," charging that the speakers are "all GMO supporters, with many well known for their extreme pro-GMO views or having vested interests in GMO adoption." A May 13 release from the group asserts that several speakers have financial ties to Monsanto, an American agricultural company that is the world's largest producer of genetically engineered seed.

Preview NCR's Family Life Issue

Watch this video from NCR Editor Dennis Coday for highlights from our annual Family Life special section.

You won't find these articles on our website. Subscribe now to receive all the content from each biweekly issue.

In an April 19 issue of the Irish Catholic, environmental writer Fr. Sean McDonagh, a Columban missionary, charged that the Academy of Sciences event is "silent" about the role that "massive profits" for biotech companies play in influencing pro-GMO arguments.

McDonagh told NCR he's planning to hold a small demonstration in Rome on Monday to provide an alternative point of view.

Potrykus wrote a letter to the editor of the Irish Catholic insisting that "it should be obvious that this study week is truly in the interest of the poor." Piero Morandi, an Italian scientist and another study week participant, wrote that anti-GMO regulation "is excessive, very costly, not science-based and therefore not only useless, but damaging the interests of people, especially the poorest."

In one sign of concern about the appearance of corporate influence, sources told NCR that plans for the study week originally called for a couple of Monsanto employees to discuss public/private partnerships in the delivery of GMO technology. Roughly a month ago, however, the Monsanto officials were quietly advised not to attend.

Though the sessions are not open to the public, preparatory materials for the conference, including abstracts of presentations published on the Web site of the Academy for Sciences, offer a flavor of the discussions.

An introduction refers to GMOs as "life-sustaining and lifesaving technologies," and asserts that "no substantiated environmental or health risks have been noted." It charges that "extreme precautionary regulation," especially in Europe, has limited the spread of GMOs, thereby restricting "the huge potential of plant biotechnology to produce more, and more nutritive, food for the poor."

The introduction says the study week is "not a standard science meeting," but rather has the goal of developing "strategies to inform the media, the public, the regulatory authorities and governments that it is unjustified, even immoral, to continue with current attitudes and processes."

Judging from the abstracts, virtually all of the official speakers at the conference share that view.

Andrew Apel, who edits a biotech news outlet called "GMObelus," charged that opposition to GMOs comes from "an international "protest industry which serves its own interests, and the interests of its funders." Henry Miller, of the Hoover Institution at Stanford University, wrote that failure to adopt wider use of GMOs is the result of a "public policy miasma," and amounts to "one of the great societal tragedies of the past quarter century."

Baron Marc Van Montagu, president of the European Federation of Biotechnology, said that "refusing GM technology will hold back efforts to alleviate poverty and hunger, to save biodiversity and protect the environment." Robert Paarlberg of Wellesley College charged that the anti-GMO movement is an "imperialism of rich tastes imposed on the poor."

Though his name does not appear on the published program, Swiss Cardinal Georges Cottier, former theologian of the papal household under Pope John Paul II, has also addressed the study week.

While conference materials frequently refer to anti-GMO sentiments among politicians, NGOs, and the media, they do not directly avert to one other source: Catholic leaders, including several bishops' conferences in the developing world.

In February 2003, the Catholic Bishops' Conference of the Philippines asked then-President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo to postpone use of a genetically modified corn, citing possible health risks. In 2002, the Catholic Bishops of South Africa declared, "It is morally irresponsible to produce and market genetically modified food."

In 2003, 14 Brazilian bishops put out a "declaration on transgenic crops," in which they condemned the cultivation and consumption of GMOs. The bishops cited three risks: 1) health consequences, including increased allergies, resistance to antibiotics, and an increase in toxic substances; 2) environmental consequences, including erosion of bio-diversity; and 3) damage to the sovereignty of Brazil, "as a result of the loss of control of seeds and living things through patents that become the exclusive property of multinational groups interested only in commercial ends."

While few of these voices are on the program, organizers did invite Bishop George Nkuo of Cameroon after a working paper for this fall's Synod of Bishops for Africa contained critical language about GMOs. The document warns that a pro-GMO push "runs the risk of ruining small landholders, abolishing traditional methods of seeding, and making farmers dependent on the production companies."

The Academy of Sciences has long been favorably inclined to GMOs. In 2004, it released a study document praising the role that GMOs could play in combating world hunger.

How far the study week may go in resolving the broader Catholic debate, however, remains to be seen. A May 1 editorial in L'Osservatore Romano, the Vatican newspaper, said that for now GMOs remain "an open question."

[John L. Allen Jr. is NCR senior correspondent. His e-mail address is jallen@ncronline.org.]

Other stories:

John Allen interviews:

Fr. Sean McDonagh: GMOs are going to create famine and hunger

Professor Bruce Chassy: Resistance to GMOs works against the hungry and poor

Bishop George Nkuo of the Kumbo diocese in Cameroon: Lone African bishop at pro-GMO meet unsure what to believe

GMOs do not combat world

GMOs do not combat world hunger...they kill crops that are narrowly suited to small & specific environmental locations...we need to stop feeding our food to animals and using our food for fuel; we need to stop the trade agreements that put a country's farmers out of work (NAFTA's sad legacy in Mexico); we need to eat enough and stop indulging...there is a difference between our bodies being satisfied and being overstuffed & popping Pepcid. GMOs can cause allergic reactions, because the person eating them has no idea of what snippet of allergen DNA has been spliced into the food's own native DNA.

We were given dominion (loving care) over animals and given plants for food...we were given to care for our planet and all upon that planet...GMOs don't fit into that mandate.

International scientists

International scientists raise concerns over genetically modified food

By Keith Lee and Richard Tyler
17 February 1999
http://www.wsws.org/articles/1999/feb1999/food-f17.shtml

The Labour government has been rocked by a dispute over the possible health dangers posed by genetically modified food. Last week 20 scientists from 13 countries issued a memorandum supporting their colleague Dr. Arpad Pusztai's research into the possible harmful effects of genetically modified (GM) food.

They oppose attempts by his former employers, the Rowett Research Institute in Scotland, to undermine his research and tarnish his reputation as a scientist, and are calling for his reinstatement.

Dr. Pusztai, a world authority on plant proteins called lectins, has written three books on the subject and published 270 research papers. He worked at the Rowett Institute for 35 years. His research involved feeding GM potatoes to rats and looking for changes in their physiology, particularly the gut, metabolic process and immune systems. This showed that the size of several organs decreased, including the brain, and that their immune system was weakened after the feeding trials.

Last year, Pustzai was abruptly removed from his research project at the Rowett Institute and forced to retire after raising his concerns in the media. In April Pusztai appeared on Granada TV's World in Action programme, with the consent of the Rowett Institute. In the course of the documentary, he remarked that he would not eat GM food and that he found it "very, very unfair to use our fellow citizens as guinea pigs".

Two days later, Professor Philip James, director of the Rowett Institute, suspended Pusztai and forced him to retire. Pusztai's supporters say that his removal was the result of industry and political pressure on the institute to silence him. Following his dismissal, Pusztai was gagged from speaking in his own defence, while his scientific methodology was publicly questioned and he was all but accused of cheating.

An internal audit carried out by the Rowett Institute into Dr. Pusztai's research denies the rats suffered any physiological abnormalities as a result of being fed the GM potatoes. The audit report did exonerate his experimental method and approach, and Professor James told the press that the investigation found absolutely no misconduct on Dr. Pusztai's part. However, the Institute has only made a summary of its findings available.

Dr. Stanley Ewen of the pathology department at Aberdeen University repeated the experiments and reached similar conclusions to Dr. Pusztai. He submitted his findings to a meeting of COST 98 Action (European Union Programme) in Lund, Sweden, in November 1998. The organisers also invited both Professor James and Dr. Chesson, the chairman of the Audit Committee, to present and justify the conclusions in the Rowett Institute's audit report to this gathering of senior scientists. Neither James nor Chesson attended or even responded to the invitation.

On February 12, professor Edilbert van Driessche and professor Thorkild C. Bøg-Hansen, joint organisers of the COST 98 meeting, issued a memorandum supported by over 20 other leading scientists who had studied Dr. Pusztai's findings.

Their memorandum states, "Those of us who have known Dr. Pusztai's work or have collaborated with him, were shocked by the harshness of his treatment by the Rowett and even more by the impenetrable secrecy surrounding these events. It is an unacceptable code of practice by the Rowett and its Director, Professor James, to set themselves up as arbiters or judges of the validity of the data which could have such a profound importance not only for scientists, but also for the public and its health."

The memorandum concludes, "There is no doubt in our minds that the reviews will remove the stigma of alleged fraud and will restore Dr. Pusztai's scientific credibility."

One of the scientists who reviewed Pustzai's work, Dr. Vyvyan Howard, foetal and infant toxico-pathologist at the University of Liverpool, told the World Socialist Web Site, "I am working on some features of lectin toxicity and that is how I came to know Arpad Pusztai, who is certainly one of the world's experts in this field."

Dr. Howard said that he believed Dr. Pusztai's data was sound. "We think it would pass peer review and be published and we are at a loss to really explain why the Rowett Institute came to the conclusion it did." Dr. Howard added that Pusztai's findings "are of considerable importance in the current debate on the safety and hazard assessment of genetically modified foods".

Professor S. Pierzynowski, from the Department of Animal Physiology, Lund University, Sweden, said, " I must stress that there is enough strong evidence that the work of the audit group was not objective and per se dangerous, not only for Dr. Pusztai, but generally for free and objective science."

Joe Cummins, Emeritus Professor of Genetics at the University of Western Ontario, Canada described the Rowett Institute's treatment of Pusztai as "a great injustice", adding that the "Institute continues to look inward to cover up its mistakes".

These eminent scientists have not only raised serious concerns about the way research into GM food is being conducted, but that those who have dissenting voices are being suppressed and have had their careers ruined, and sometimes their health. Dr. Pusztai has suffered a mild heart attack brought on by the stress caused by trying to restore his scientific reputation and the credibility of his research.

These concerns were echoed by Dr. Kenneth Lough, FRSE, a former principal scientific officer at the Rowett Institute between 1956 and 1987. He said, "In my view the evidence presented in the audit report must be considered as unsafe and is without justification for use against the scientific reputation of Dr. Pusztai. The Institute is at risk in sending the wrong signals to scientists in this field of research that any sign of apparent default will be treated with the utmost severity. The awareness will of course act as strong deterrent to those who wish to conduct research in this vitally important field."

Thank you, John Allen for

Thank you, John Allen for raising our awareness of GMOs and framing the debate regarding them.

If nothing else, the Vatican

If nothing else, the Vatican is starting to realize that once they have saved all those babies from abortion, they do have to be fed. Or is this just another diversionary wrinkle in the seamless garment of life? Perhaps they can mobilize some of the 74 (and counting...) USCCB "abortion bishops" to aid their research, now that Obama's Notre Dame speech has come and gone. Nah, that would be making a POSITIVE contribution for a change. Much easier for them to just keep saying NO!

So, will genetically

So, will genetically engineered wheat and grapes be acceptable? And will we pay royalties for their use in the Eucharist?

Those interested in a

Those interested in a scientific analysis of the claims for the benefits of genetically modified crops for increasing yield, should read the analysis done by the Union of Concerned Scientists. This can be found at
http://ucsusa.org/food_and_agriculture/science_and_impacts/science/failu...

Required

Required Reading
http://ucsusa.org/food_and_agriculture/science_and_impacts/science/failu...

It is time that these Cardinals and Archbishops get themselves "educated" on this too, so that they are not "caught uninformed" during their next trip to the VATICAN:

1. Cardinal Justin Rigali - Philadelphia, PA; Chairman, USCCB Pro-Life Committee
2. Cardinal Francis George - Chicago, IL; President, USCCB
3. Cardinal Anthony Bevilacqua (Archbishop Emeritus) - Philadelphia, PA
4. Cardinal Daniel DiNardo - Houston, TX

5. Archbishop Donald Wuerl - Washington, D.C.
6. Archbishop Daniel E. Pilarczyk - Cincinnati, OH
7. Archbishop Edwin O'Brien - Baltimore, MD
8. Archbishop John C. Nienstedt - St. Paul-Minneapolis, MN
9. Archbishop Joseph Naumann - Kansas City, KS
10.Archbishop John J. Myers - Newark, NJ
11.Archbishop Alfred Hughes - New Orleans, LA
12.Archbishop José Gomez - San Antonio, TX
13.Archbishop Timothy Dolan - New York, NY
14.Archbishop Charles Chaput - Denver, CO
15.Archbishop-Elect Robert Carlson - St. Louis
16.Archbishop Eusebius Beltran - Oklahoma City, OK
17.Archbishop Daniel Buechlein - Indianapolis, IN

Does this come under the

Does this come under the category of "faith" or "morals"? With all that is wrong within the Catholic Church, I am disturbed that time and energy are being wasted on such an issue.

Cancer and asthma rates are

Cancer and asthma rates are rising at alarming levels in the U.S. where most of what we eat is modified in some form. The rates aren't as high in Europe where they limit modified foods. Why in the world do we have to have them? Yes, if we stop eating as much meat and stop the use of corn (how about using all the grass trimmings from the suburbs) for ethanol we could continue to feed all of the worlds poor. When we don't eat real food we suffer for it eventually. Why hoist the same problems on the poor of the world?

Sounds like the official

Sounds like the official church is poised on the brink of a grave error that has high potential to do serious harm to all of God's creation. The Vatican should not be an advocate, however unintended or indirectly, for Monsanto and other multinationals whose only concern is making as much money as they can. The alleged benefits of developing, growing and eating GMO's are fiction. GMO work is nothing less than playing God with the human food supply and with the environment. They must be carefully monitored and fully tested, and even then they might escape into nature and wreck havoc in ways we can only imagine. Shame on the church for buying into this BS.

The Gmo Trilogy And Seeds of

The Gmo Trilogy And Seeds of Deception Set (Paperback)
by Jeffrey M. Smith

Yes! Books; DVD edition (September 15, 2006)
ISBN-10: 0972966536; ISBN-13: 978-0972966535

Now Jeffrey M. Smith’s best-selling book is paired with a new DVD and CD set that shows how genetically modified organisms (GMOs) put our health and environment at risk. This set will impact consumer perceptions and buying habits.

DVD 1: Unnatural Selection

This stunning, award-winning documentary by Bertram Verhaag and Gabriele Kröber reveals harsh consequences of genetic engineering on three continents. Vandana Shiva, Andrew Kimbrell, Percy Schmeiser and others, describe uncontrollable, self-replicating GM contamination, failed crops, farmer suicides, and new GM animals that threaten natural populations.

"Best Film," (CineEco, Portugal), "Best Long Production," (IEFF, Brazil), and "Best Journalistic Achievement," (IEFF, Germany).

"Meticulously researched, excellently photographed" –Ökomedia

DVD 2: Hidden Dangers in Kids’ Meals: Genetically Engineered Foods

Shocking research results, inadequate regulations and warnings from eminent scientists explain why GM foods are dangerous and should be removed from kids’ meals. The dramatic story of how student behavior in a Wisconsin school was transformed with a healthy diet provides added motivation to make a change. It features Jeffrey Smith and more than a dozen scientists and experts.

"Hidden Dangers pierces the myth that our government is protecting our food supply."

–John Robbins, Diet for a New America

"It will change the way you look at food forever."

–Howard Lyman, Mad Cowboy

Audio CD: You’re Eating WHAT?

Jeffrey Smith’s riveting one-hour talk.

"The most powerful presentation I have ever heard on the issue of genetically engineered foods.

–Craig Winters, The Campaign to Label Genetically Engineered Foods
****************************************************************************

Seeds of Deception

This is the top-rated, best selling book in the world on GM foods. Smith exposes the serious health dangers of genetically modified foods and the corporate cover-up. A fast-paced thriller of industry manipulation and political collusion, combined with lucid descriptions of genetic engineering and guidance on how to protect yourself and your family.

From the Publisher
From Publishers Weekly

Recent news headlines have focused on the disagreement between the U.S. and Europe over genetically modified foods: the U.S. exports them, but the European Union doesn't want to import them, believing their safety remains unproven.

Are genetically modified foods safe? Longtime anti-GM foods campaigner Smith presents the "opposing" case. He offers cases where GM produced results that were at best unexpected (increased starch content in potatoes), at worst grotesque (pigs without genitals).

He describes how one corporation reportedly tried to bribe Canadian government scientists into approving genetically engineered bovine growth hormones they deemed unsafe;
How some scientists have reported their careers were threatened as a result of their refusal to approve certain GM products in the U.S.; and How "conflicts of interest, sloppy science, and industry influence" can distort the approval process.

The cases Smith presents are scary and timely.

HAIL to POTRYKUS! HAIL to FAO!!! HAIL to the VATICAN!!! - the THREE STOOGES for MONSANTO

Potrykus wrote a letter to

Potrykus wrote a letter to the editor of the Irish Catholic insisting that "it should be obvious that this study week is truly in the interest of the poor."

Potrykus is "TRULY" interested in promoting "HIMSELF" and DEFINITELY NOT the POOR, as this TIME MAGAZINE STORY shows:

For about a year now--ever since Potrykus and his chief collaborator, Peter Beyer of the University of Freiburg in Germany, announced their achievement--their golden grain has illuminated an increasingly polarized public debate. At issue is the question of what genetically engineered crops represent. Are they, as their proponents argue, a technological leap forward that will bestow incalculable benefits on the world and its people? Or do they represent a perilous step down a slippery slope that will lead to ecological and agricultural ruin? Is genetic engineering just a more efficient way to do the business of conventional crossbreeding? Or does the ability to mix the genes of any species--even plants and animals--give man more power than he should have?

http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,997586,00.html

Another typical example of the "WHITE MAN KNOWS IT ALL"

Switzerland (which does not EXPORT RICE!!) telling the regions that grow rice (ASIA, AFRICA and AMERICA) as to HOW TO IMPROVE their RICE!!

One does not go to a BUTCHER instead of a BARBER for a Haircut.

But that is precisely what VATICAN is doing "DELVING" into an area where it had "ZERO" EXPERTISE.

VATICAN has been "BOUGHT BY MONSANTO" for a "mess of pottage" - POTRYKUS

GOD SAVE THE VATICAN from MONSANTO!!

GOLDEN RICE MADE IN

GOLDEN RICE MADE IN SWITZERLAND

I wonder if Papa Ratzi knows that POTRYKUS is "MANIPULATING the VATICAN" on the behalf of MONSANTO to repeat the mistakes of another Conference:

THE Berlin Conference (1884)
The Berlin Conference (German: Kongokonferenz or "Congo Conference") of 1884–85 regulated European colonization and trade in Africa during the New Imperialism period, and coincided with Germany's sudden emergence as an imperial power. Called for by Portugal and organized by Otto von Bismarck, the first Chancellor of Germany, its outcome, the General Act of the Berlin Conference, is often seen as the formalization of the Scramble for Africa. The conference ushered in a period of heightened colonial activity on the part of the European powers, while simultaneously eliminating most existing forms of African autonomy and self-governance.King Leopold II was able to convince France and Germany that common trade in Africa was in the best interests of all three countries. On the initiative of Portugal, Otto von Bismarck, German Chancellor, called on representatives of Austria–Hungary, Belgium, Denmark, France, the United Kingdom, Italy, the Netherlands, Portugal, Russia, Spain, Sweden-Norway (union until 1905), the Ottoman Empire, and the United States to take part in the Berlin Conference to work out policy. However, the United States did not actually participate in the conference.

***************************************************************************

Switzerland (which does not EXPORT RICE!!) is telling the regions of the world that grow rice (ASIA, AFRICA and AMERICA) as to HOW TO IMPROVE their RICE!!

WHAT a JOKE! Only POTRYKUS can "believe" that he can "SAVE AFRICA" with his golden rice, MADE IN SWITZERLAND.

The Potrykus episode is no

The Potrykus episode is no different from the episode of another SWISS company, NESTLE that applied enormous pressure,reported on April 24, 2005 in the BOSTON GLOBE:

http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2005/04/24/ex_empl...

In the letter, Finney said she was an attorney-adviser in the General Counsel's Office working on policies involving the UN Development Program when Bolton called her into his office in late 1982 or early 1983. She wrote that Bolton asked her to persuade delegates from other countries to vote with the United States to weaken World Health Organization restrictions on marketing of infant formula in the developing world.

Finney said she refused because improper use of the formula can be deadly. For example, mothers in the developing world sometimes mix it with contaminated water or dilute it to make it last longer, humanitarian groups say.

Finney said that Bolton ''shouted that Nestle was an important company and that he was giving me a direct order from President Reagan." The Swiss company is among the top makers of formula.

''He yelled that if I didn't obey him, he would fire me," she wrote. ''I said I could not live with myself if even one baby died because of something I did. . . . He screamed that I was fired."

Bolton has declined to comment on allegations during the confirmation process.

Hail to NESTLE! HAIL to POTRYKUS!!
Who cares about the THIRD WORLD?
The FIRST WORLD knows what is best for the Third World.

For more info on this topic

For more info on this topic check out The Fast Draw! http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2009/06/03/fastdraw/entry5058630.shtml

Thical/moral? or Monetary

Thical/moral? or Monetary interests?.It is the Pontifical Athenaeum Regina Apostolorum which is run by the Legion of Christ .The school of Bioethics is a subdivision of this institution and it is from there that the Legion always has a spokesman present and commenting to the media on these GMO summits.zenit News is also owned by the Legion....the question is ......Is any of this Ethical?

http://archives.foodsafety.ksu.edu/agnet/2003/11-2003/agnet_nov_30.htm.top
GMO development: a moral duty ?
November 28, 2003
Crop Biotech Update
If genetically modified organisms represent an opportunity for development, especially for poor countries, it might be a moral duty to develop and disseminate them.
Father Gonzalo Miranda, dean of the School of Bioethics of the Regina Apostolorum Pontifical Athenaeum, expressed this view at a symposium held at

the Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace.
Father Miranda spoke about biotechnology?s role in the development of the poorer countries and emphasized that ?the Church invites us to go beyond mere justice and equity and undertake the path of solidarity. He said that "solidarity" should ?facilitate not only the dissemination of seeds for improved crop varieties but also the dissemination of knowledge and technology.
With regard to Christian ethics, Father Miranda stressed that "God has put man as a gardener of creation, who must act with responsibility to cultivate and take care of creation." "Some people think that genetic manipulation of living beings is an ethically reprehensible act because it tends to alter what is natural, but the Church's anthropological view leads to different conclusions," Father Miranda explained. If man intervenes, without abusing or harming nature, it can be said that "he intervenes not to modify nature, but to help it to develop according to its essence, that of creation, that willed by God."

http://www.junkscience.com/nov03.html.

"Using Genetically Modified Organisms Could Be a Duty, Says Bioethicist, If They Pose Opportunity for Development" - "ROME, NOV. 21, 2003 - If genetically modified organisms represent an opportunity for development, especially for poor countries, it might be a moral duty to disseminate them, says a bioethicist. Father Gonzalo Miranda, dean of the School of Bioethics of the Regina Apostolorum Pontifical Athenaeum, expressed this idea last week when addressing the symposium held at the Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace, on "Genetically Modified Organisms and the Social Doctrine of the Church." In an interview with ZENIT, Father Miranda spoke about the function that biotechnology might have in the development of the poorer countries and emphasized that "the Church invites us to go beyond mere justice and equity and undertake the path of solidarity." "If GMOs represent a real opportunity to foster the development of all countries, especially the neediest, it would be a real moral and solidaristic duty to favor their dissemination," he said. "To block them a priori in virtue of merely ideological postures or disgraceful economic interests would not only be a lack of solidarity but also a grave injustice," the priest noted." (Zenit.org)
"Friday, September 24, 2004
Venue: The Pontifical Gregorian University, Piazza della Pilotta, 4, Rome, Italy.
The Vicar General Luis Garza LC has family fortune interests in GMOs. Therefore, how is it this conference, as the one in 2004, continues to portray positive ethical and moral views concerning the GMO debate from the LC run School of Bioethics,subdivision of the Legion run Pontifical Athenaeum Regina Apostolorum. is that Ethical?
http://www.pmac.net/romo.html
http://www.rickross.com/reference/loc/loc55.html
http://blog.beliefnet.com/viamedia/2005/05/questions-about-lc_comments.html
http://dirtsecrets.wordpress.com/2009/03/30/chapter-17/
http://wapedia.mobi/en/Alfonso_Romo
http://www.gene.ch/info4action/2000/Feb/msg00001.html
http://books.google.com/books?id=8aiTuzKYZu8C&pg=PA93&lpg=PA93&dq=alfons...

aight

aight

Post new comment

NCR Comment code:

  1. Be respectful. Do not attack the writer. Take on the idea, not the messenger.
  2. Use appropriate language. Avoid vulgarities and slurs.
  3. Keep to the point. Deliberate digressions don't aid the discussion.

For more detailed guidelines, visit our User Guidelines page.

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
(if you have one; if not, leave this blank)
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <font> <swf> <swf list>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You may use <swf file="song.mp3"> to display Flash files inline

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This is to prove you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.