Money paved way for Maciel's influence in the Vatican

Apr. 06, 2010
Fr. Marcial Maciel Degollado greets Pope John Paul II in St. Peter's Square in this 2000 file photo. (CNS)

First of Two Parts

In his time, the late Fr. Marcial Maciel Degollado was the greatest fundraiser of the modern Roman Catholic church. He was also a magnetic figure in recruiting young men to religious life in an era when vocations were plummeting. Behind that exalted façade, however, Maciel was a notorious pedophile, and a man who fathered several children by different women. His life was arguably the darkest chapter in the clergy abuse crisis that continues to plague the church.

The saga of the disgraced founder of the Legion of Christ, a secretive, cult-like religious order now under Vatican investigation, opens into a deeper story of how one man's lies and betrayal dazzled key figures in the Roman curia and how Maciel's money and success helped him find protection and influence. For years, the heads of Vatican congregations and the pope himself ignored persistent warnings that something was rotten in the community where Legionaries called their leader Nuestro Padre , "Our Father," and considered him a living saint.

The charismatic Mexican, who founded the Legion of Christ in 1941, sent streams of money to Roman curia officials with a calculated end, according to many sources interviewed by NCR: Maciel was buying support for his group and defense for himself, should his astounding secret life become known.

This much is well established from previous reporting: Maciel was a morphine addict who sexually abused at least 20 Legion seminarians from the 1940s to the '60s. Bishop John McGann of Rockville Centre, N.Y., sent a letter by a former Legion priest with detailed allegations to the Vatican in 1976, 1978 and 1989 through official channels. Nothing happened. Maciel began fathering children in the early 1980s -- three of them by two Mexican women, with reports of a third family with three children in Switzerland, according to El Mundo in Madrid, Spain. Concealing his web of relations, Maciel raised a fortune from wealthy backers, and ingratiated himself with church officials in Rome.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Related story, April 13: Commissioner likely to oversee Legion of Christ

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

"What I can say about Fr. Maciel is that he was a consummate con artist," Fr. Stephen Fichter, a sociologist and former Legion official, told NCR. "He would use any means to achieve his end, even if that meant lying to the pope, or any of the cardinals in Rome."

NCR: February 3-16, 2012

Subscribe to NCR to get all the news and special features that aren't always available online. In this issue:

- US News: Bishops Host Conference on Immigration
Conference fields advocates' questions on law, policy

- Special Section:Deacons.Serving as parish administrator; roles of wives; and more

- Study: Black Catholics are more engaged
New study by Notre Dame researcher about parish involvement in America

Subscribe now!

When Maciel died on Jan. 30, 2008, the Legion leadership announced that the 87-year-old founder had gone to heaven. While God alone knows Maciel's fate, the Legion's statement stands in hindsight as one final act of deception by a figure whose legacy is still wreaking havoc from the grave. In February 2009, the Legionaries revealed that Maciel had a daughter. Late last month, the Legionaries issued a vaguely worded statement of regret to unnamed victims of Maciel -- four years after Pope Benedict XVI banished him from active ministry to "a life of prayer and repentance" for abusing seminarians.

Maciel left a trail of wreckage among his followers. Moreover, in a gilded irony for Benedict -- who prosecuted him despite pressure from Maciel's chief supporter, Cardinal Angelo Sodano, Vatican secretary of state from 1990 to 2006 -- Maciel left an ecclesiastical empire with which the church must now contend. The Italian newsweekly L'espresso estimates the Legion's assets at 25 billion euros, with a $650 million annual budget, according to The Wall Street Journal .The order numbered 700 priests and 1,300 seminarians in 2008. On March 15 of this year, five bishops, called visitators, from as many countries, delivered their reports to the pope after a seven-month investigation. A final report is expected by the end of April.

Not in centuries has a scandal in the church had such complexity as this one. A huge financial operation is in the hands of a religious order many critics have likened to a cult, a group whose leadership is suspected of hiding its superior's corrupt life. As the Vatican grapples with the Legion -- and thorny legal questions as to whether the Holy See can intervene in the Legion's far-flung financial operations -- three of Maciel's sons and their mother in Mexico demand compensation, claiming they were cut off by the Legion when Maciel died.

Besides the complex questions of whether to dismantle or "reform" the Legion, Benedict is under pressure from a resurgent sex abuse scandal in Ireland, and cases from years back in Germany, Wisconsin and Arizona, in which he reportedly failed to discipline abusive priests.

The Legion scandal stands out for another reason: The Maciel case and the trail of money he reportedly gave cardinals raises profound ethical questions about how money circulates in the Vatican.

In an NCR investigation that began last July, encompassing dozens of interviews in Rome, Mexico City and several U.S. cities, what emerges is the saga of a man who ingratiated himself with Vatican officials, including some of those in charge of offices that should have investigated him, as he dispensed thousands of dollars in cash and largesse.

Maciel built his base by cultivating wealthy patrons, particularly widows, starting in his native Mexico in the 1940s. Even as he was trailed by pedophilia accusations, Maciel attracted large numbers of seminarians in an era of dwindling vocations. In 1994 Pope John Paul II heralded him as "an efficacious guide to youth." John Paul continued praising Maciel after a 1997 Hartford Courant investigation by Gerald Renner and this writer exposed Maciel's drug habits and abuse of seminarians. In 1998, eight ex-Legionaries filed a canon law case to prosecute him in then-Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger's tribunal. For the next six years, Maciel had the staunch support of three pivotal figures: Sodano; Cardinal Eduardo Martínez Somalo, prefect of the Congregation for Institutes of Consecrated Life and Societies of Apostolic Life; and Msgr. Stanislaw Dziwisz, the Polish secretary of John Paul. During those years, Sodano pressured Ratzinger not to prosecute Maciel, as NCR previously reported. Ratzinger told a Mexican bishop that the Maciel case was a "delicate" matter and questioned whether it would be "prudent" to prosecute at that time.

In 2004, John Paul -- ignoring the canon law charges against Maciel -- honored him in a Vatican ceremony in which he entrusted the Legion with the administration of Jerusalem's Notre Dame Center, an education and conference facility. The following week, Ratzinger took it on himself to authorize an investigation of Maciel.

John Paul's support gave Maciel credibility as he moved with seamless ease among the ultra-wealthy. At a 2004 fundraiser in New York, a video cameraman filmed him running his fingers down the tuxedo lapel of the Mexican billionaire Carlos Slim, a major Legion supporter. Besides donations, Legion schools in Mexico with high tuitions and low salaries subsidized the operations in Rome, say men familiar with the order's finances.

As questions swirl about how Maciel misled so many people, his ability to attract the powerful and influential is beyond dispute. Legion supporters ranged from Steve McEveety, producer of Mel Gibson's "The Passion of the Christ" (Legion priests advised on the film), to Thomas Monaghan, founder of Domino's Pizza and Ave Maria University in Florida. Others who supported the Legion include former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush and former Pennsylvania Sen. Rick Santorum, who spoke at Legion conferences; Spanish opera singer Placido Domingo, who performed at a fundraiser; and the late Fr. Richard John Neuhaus, editor of First Things, who wrote that he believed with "moral certainty" that the charges against Maciel were "false and malicious."

Harvard Law Professor and former U.S. ambassador to the Vatican Mary Ann Glendon taught at Regina Apostolorum Athenaeum, the Legion's university in Rome, and advised in the planning that led to the order's first university in America, University of Sacramento, Calif. In a 2002 letter for the Legion Web site she scoffed at the allegations against him and praised Maciel's "radiant holiness" and "the success of Regnum Christi [the order's lay wing] and the Legionaries of Christ in advancing the New Evangelization."

Author and conservative activist George Weigel also endorsed the Legion in 2002 on its Web site: "If Fr. Maciel and his charism as a founder are to be judged by the fruits of this work, those fruits are most impressive indeed." Weigel has since called on the Vatican to investigate the order.

CNN commentator William Bennett spoke at Legion gatherings and also said: "I am fortunate enough to know and trust the priests of the Legionaries of Christ. ... The flourishing of the Legionaries is a cause for hope in a time of much darkness." Former CNN religion correspondent Delia Gallagher spoke at a Legion fundraiser, and William Donohue, president of the New York-based Catholic League for Religious and Civil Rights, defended Maciel in a letter to the Hartford Courant , after a 1997 article that exposed Maciel's history of pedophilia.

Two Legion priests are TV news celebrities: Jonathan Morris on FOX, and Tom Williams, a theology professor at the Legion university in Rome, for NBC during Katie Couric's coverage of the 2005 conclave and again with Couric at CBS.

Consequences came late

In April 2005, Ratzinger was elected pope. In 2006, as Benedict, he banished Maciel from ministry to a "life of prayer and penitence." Maciel left Rome in disgrace, though the Legionaries mounted a defense of his innocence.

In the last week of January 2008, Maciel's 21-year-old daughter and her mother reportedly traveled from Spain to the Miami hospital where he lay dying. That pleased him, while jarring several Legionaries; but the women did not go on to Mexico for the funeral. His three sons and their mother in Mexico avoided the funeral too. His chosen Legion successors gathered in his remote hometown, Cotija de la Paz, for burial at a family crypt, far from his previously designated tomb at Rome's Our Lady of Guadalupe Basilica, which he built in the 1950s.

Besides Fichter, who has a parish in New Jersey, two priests still serving the church who left the Legion several years ago drew on detailed knowledge of Maciel's financial practices in lengthy interviews, answering questions in continuing telephone calls and e-mails. These priests -- and two priests in Rome who are members of the Legion -- spoke on background, fearing repercussions to their careers were they to be identified.

This story also relies on international press accounts, works by Spanish and Mexican researchers, and attorneys who are piecing together information on Maciel's financial strategy and his families.

NCR made repeated efforts to seek comment from the three cardinals who allegedly received substantial payments under Maciel's auspices, by speaking with Vatican spokesman Fr. Federico Lombardi on the telephone and via follow-up e-mails. Besides calls to the residences of the two cardinals in Rome, the paper made an extensive effort to contact now-Cardinal Dziwisz, in Krakow, Poland. Iowana Hoffman, a Polish journalist in New York, translated a letter with questions for the cardinal, faxed it to Dziwisz's press secretary, but was told that the cardinal "does not have time for an interview."

Sodano, the former secretary of state and now dean of the College of Cardinals, and Martínez Somalo, former papal chamberlain, did not respond to messages left with Lombardi. A receptionist who answered Sodano's residential number said to call the Vatican. The woman answering Martínez Somalo's phone, when asked in Spanish if he would speak with a journalist, said emphatically, " No entrevista! " -- "No interview."

Had Sodano, Martínez Somalo and Dziwisz responded, the cardinals might have answered one question that hovers over this baroque financial drama: How do Vatican officials decide what to report, and to whom, if they are given large sums of money? The Vatican has no constitution or statutes that would make such transactions illegal. But those familiar with the strategy say it was Maciel's goal to insulate himself from the Vatican's archaic system of secret tribunals by making friends with men in power.

For most of his life, it worked.

Making friends in the right places

The Vatican office with the greatest potential to derail Maciel's career before 2001 -- the year that Ratzinger persuaded John Paul to consolidate authority of abuse investigations in his office – was the Congregation for Religious, which oversaw religious orders such as the Dominicans, Franciscans and Legionaries, among many others.

According to two former Legionaries who spent years in Rome, Maciel paid for the renovation of the residence in Rome for the Argentine cardinal who was prefect of religious from 1976 to 1983, the late Eduardo Francisco Pironio. "That's a pretty big resource," explains one priest, who said the Legion's work on the residence was expensive, and widely known at upper levels of the order. "Pironio got his arm twisted to sign the Legion constitution."

The Legion constitution included the highly controversial Private Vows, by which each Legionary swore never to speak ill of Maciel, or the superiors, and to report to them anyone who uttered criticism. The vows basically rewarded spying as an expression of faith, and cemented the Legionaries' lockstep obedience to the founder. The vows were Maciel's way of deflecting scrutiny as a pedophile. But cardinals on the consultors' board at Congregation for Religious balked on granting approval.

"Therefore, Maciel went to the pope through Msgr. Dziwisz," said the priest. "Two weeks later Pironio signed it."

Dziwisz was John Paul's closest confidante, a Pole who had a bedroom in the private quarters of the Apostolic Palace. Maciel spent years cultivating Dziwisz's support. Under Maciel, the Legion steered streams of money to Dziwisz in his function as gatekeeper for the pope's private Masses in the Apostolic Palace. Attending Mass in the small chapel was a rare privilege for the occasional head of state, like British Prime Minister Tony Blair and his family. "Mass would start at 7 a.m., and there was always someone in attendance: laypeople, or priests, or groups of bishops," Dziwisz wrote in a 2008 memoir, A Life With Karol: My Forty-Year Friendship With the Man Who Became Pope.

"When the guests came in (there were never more than 50)," Dziwisz wrote, "they often found the pope kneeling in prayer with his eyes closed, in a state of total abandonment, almost of ecstasy, completely unaware of who was entering the chapel. ... For the laypeople, it was a great spiritual experience. The Holy Father attached extreme importance to the presence of the lay faithful."

One of the ex-Legionaries in Rome told NCR that a Mexican family in 1997 gave Dziwisz $50,000 upon attending Mass. "We arranged things like that," he said of his role as go-between. Did John Paul know about the funds? Only Dziwisz would know. Given the pope's ascetic lifestyle and accounts of his charitable giving, the funds could have gone to a deserving cause. Dziwisz's book says nothing of donations and contains no mention of Maciel or the Legion. The priest who arranged for the Mexican family to attend Mass worried, in hindsight, about the frequency with which Legionaries facilitated funds to Dziwisz.

"This happened all the time with Dziwisz," said a second ex-Legionary, who was informed of the transactions.

Fr. Alvaro Corcuera, who would succeed Maciel as director general in 2004, and one or two other Legionaries "would go up to see Dziwisz on the third floor. They were welcomed. They were known within the household."

Struggling to give context to the donations, this cleric continued: "You're saying these laypeople are good and fervent, it's good for them to meet the pope. The expression is opera carita -- 'We're making an offering for your works of charity.' That's the way it's done. In fact you don't know where the money's going." He paused. "It's an elegant way of giving a bribe."

Recalling those events, he spoke of what made him leave the Legion. "I woke up and asked: Am I giving my life to serve God, or one man who had his problems? It was not worth consecrating myself to Maciel."

What's a bribe?

In terms of legal reality, does "an elegant way of giving a bribe" add up to bribery? The money from Maciel was given to heads of congregations in the early 1990s and the newspaper exposure of Maciel did not occur until 1997, and the canon law case in 1998.

Further, such exchanges are not considered bribes in the view of Nicholas Cafardi, a prominent canon lawyer and the dean emeritus of Duquesne University Law School in Pittsburgh. Cafardi, who has done work as a legal consultant for many bishops, responded to a general question about large donations to priests or church officials in the Vatican.

Under church law (canon 1302), a large financial gift to an official in Rome "would qualify as a pious cause," explains Cafardi. He spoke in broad terms, saying that such funds should be reported to the cardinal-vicar for Rome. An expensive gift, like a car, need not be reported.

"That's how I read the law. I know of no exceptions. Cardinals do have to report gifts for pious causes. If funds are given for the official's personal charity, that is not a pious cause and need not be reported."

Because the cardinals did not respond to interview requests, NCR has been unable to determine whether they reported to Vatican officials the money they allegedly received from the Legion.

"Maciel wanted to buy power," said the priest who facilitated the Mexican family's opera carita to Dziwisz. He did not use the word bribery, but in explaining why he left the Legion, morality was at issue. "It got to a breaking point for me [over] a culture of lying [within the order]. The superiors know they're lying and they know that you know," he said. "They lie about money, where it comes from, where it goes, how it's given."

When Martínez Somalo, a Spaniard, became head of the congregation overseeing religious in 1994, Maciel dispatched this priest to Martínez Somalo's home. The young priest carried an envelope thick with cash. "I didn't bat an eye," he recalled. "I went up to his apartment, handed him the envelope, said goodbye. ... It was a way of making friends, insuring certain help if it were needed, oiling the cogs."

Martínez Somalo did not respond to NCR interview requests.

Fr. Marcial Maciel Degollado, wearing glasses at center left, is pictured with young Legion of Christ students in this photo believed to be taken in Mexico in the mid-1940s. (CNS photo)Fr. Marcial Maciel Degollado, wearing glasses at center left, is pictured with young Legion of Christ students in this photo believed to be taken in Mexico in the mid-1940s. (CNS photo)

Glenn Favreau, a Legionary in Rome from 1990 to 1997, and today an attorney in Washington, D.C., recalled: "Martínez Somalo was talked about a lot in the Legion, always in the context of 'our superior' because he was our friend. Un amigo de Legion." Favreau, who knew nothing of the donation to Martínez Somalo, continued: "There were cardinals who weren't amigos. They wouldn't call them enemies, but everyone knew who they were. Pio Laghi did not like the Legion." Cardinal Laghi, former papal nuncio to the United States, was then prefect of the Congregation for Catholic Education.

Martínez Somalo's office took a new name: Congregation for Institutes of Consecrated Life and Societies of Apostolic Life. But the job description stayed the same. From 1994 to 2004, the Spanish cardinal's duties included investigating any complaints about religious orders or their leaders.

In the files of that congregation, according to several former Legionaries, sat letters that dated back many years, accusing Maciel of abusing seminarians. When the wrenching accounts of nine seminary-victims of Maciel made news in the 1997 Hartford Courant, Martínez Somalo did nothing. That was the reaction throughout the Roman curia.

John Paul named Martínez Somalo to the post of carmelango, or chamberlain, the official in charge of the conclave when a pope is elected.

Today, the cardinal in charge of the congregation that oversees religious orders is Franc Rodé. He lavished praise on Maciel, the Legion and its lay wing, Regnum Christi, for years.

One cardinal who rebuffed a Legion financial gift was Joseph Ratzinger.

In 1997 he gave a lecture on theology to Legionaries. When a Legionary handed him an envelope, saying it was for his charitable use, Ratzinger refused. "He was tough as nails in a very cordial way," a witness said.

Maciel's modus operandi

Maciel traveled incessantly, drawing funds from Legion centers in Mexico, Rome and the United States. Certain ex-Legionaries with knowledge of the order's finances believe that Maciel constantly drew from Legion coffers to subsidize his families.

For years Maciel had Legion priests dole out envelopes with cash and donate gifts to officials in the curia. In the days leading up to Christmas, Legion seminarians spent hours packaging the baskets with expensive bottles of wine, rare brandy, and cured Spanish hams that alone cost upward of $1,000 each. Priests involved in the gifts and larger cash exchanges say that in hindsight they view Maciel's strategy as akin to an insurance policy, to protect himself should he be exposed and to position the Legion as an elite presence in the workings of the Vatican.

Fichter, the former Legion member, is today pastor of Sacred Heart Parish in Haworth, N.J. He has been a diocesan priest for a decade, and serves in the Newark archdiocese. He coordinated the Legion's administrative office in Rome from February 1998 until October 2000.

"When Fr. Maciel would leave Rome it was my duty to supply him with $10,000 in cash -- $5,000 in American dollars, and the other half in the currency of the country to which he was traveling," explained Fichter. "I would be informed by one of his assistants that he was leaving and I would have to prepare the funds for him. I never questioned that he was not using it for good and noble purposes. It was a routine part of my job. He was so totally above reproach that I felt honored to have that role. He did not submit any receipts and I would have not dared to ask him for a receipt."

Fichter was reluctant to be interviewed, expressing concern that his views be fully reflected. "As Legionaries our norms concerning the use of money were very restricted," he began. "If I went on an outing I was given $20 and if I had a pizza I'd return the $15 to my superior with a receipt. The sad thing is that we were so naive. We were scrupulously trying to live our vow of poverty and yet never questioned [Maciel's] own fidelity to the same.

"So many of my old classmates are still in the Legion and I feel that they are going through such a hard time right now. I don't want to have my words misconstrued. ... Maciel hoodwinked everyone. In hindsight I regret that I and so many others were so gullible. Thankfully, for me that was many years ago."

Since earning his doctorate in sociology from Rutgers University, Fichter has worked as a research associate for the Center for Applied Research in the Apostolate (CARA) at Georgetown University in Washington.

"I am very happy as a pastor and in the research work I am doing for the good of the church. At this stage of my life, having collaborated with the Vatican investigation of the Legion, I pray each day for those who are still Legionaries. If I can help them in any way I will."

Justice delayed

After the ex-Legion victims filed a canonical case in 1998 against Maciel in the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Sodano as secretary of state -- essentially, the Vatican prime minister -- pressured Ratzinger, as the congregation's prefect, to halt the proceeding. As NCR reported in 2001, José Barba, a college professor in Mexico City and ex-Legionary who filed the 1998 case in Ratzinger's office, learned from the canonist handling the case, Martha Wegan in Rome, of Sodano's role.

"Sodano came over with his entire family, 200 of them, for a big meal when he was named cardinal," recalled Favreau. "And we fed them all. When he became secretary of state there was another celebration. He'd come over for special events, like the groundbreaking with a golden shovel for the House of Higher Studies. And a dinner after that."

The intervention of a high Vatican official in a tribunal case illustrates the fragile nature of the system, and in the Maciel case, how a guilty man escaped punishment for years.

"Cardinal Sodano was the cheerleader for the Legion," said one of the ex-Legionaries. "He'd come give a talk at Christmas and they'd give him $10,000." Another priest recalled a $5,000 donation to Sodano.

But in December 2004, with John Paul's health deteriorating by the day, Ratzinger broke with Sodano and ordered a canon lawyer on his staff, Msgr. Charles Scicluna, to investigate. Two years later, as Benedict, he approved the order that Maciel abandon ministry for a "life of penitence and prayer." Maciel had "more than 20 but less than 100 victims," an unnamed Vatican official told NCR's John Allen at the time.

The congregation cited Maciel's age in opting against a full trial.

An influential Vatican official told NCR that Sodano insisted on softening the language of the Vatican communiqué -- to praise the Legion and its 60,000-member lay wing, Regnum Christi -- despite the order's nine-year Web site campaign denouncing the seminary victims. The Legion's damage control rolled into a new phase with its statement that compared Maciel to Christ for refusing to defend himself, and accepting his "new cross" with "tranquility of conscience."

Maciel left Rome, the scandal seemingly over. Internally, the Legion insisted to its members and followers that Maciel was innocent.

In 2009, a year after Maciel's death, the Legion disclosed its surprise on discovering that he had a daughter. The news jolted the order and its lay arm, Regnum Christi. Yet in an organization built on a cult of personality, the long praise from John Paul suggested a legacy of virtue in Maciel. Legion officials scrambled to suppress skepticism.

Two Legion priests told NCR in July that seminarians in Rome were still being taught about Maciel's virtuous life. "They are being brainwashed, as if nothing happened," said a Legionary, sitting on a bench near Rome's Tiber River.

Thanks to Sodano's intervention, the order clung to a shaky defense in arguing that the Vatican never specifically said that Maciel abused anyone.

How much Legion officials knew about Maciel's other life -- the daughter with her mother in Madrid and three sons with their mother in Mexico -- is a pivotal issue in the Vatican inquiry underway.

How much money did Maciel use to support his families? How much did he siphon off for other purposes behind the guise of a religious charity?

Behind these questions loom others about money in the Vatican. Are envelopes with thousands of dollars in cash given to cardinals when they say Mass, give talks or have dinner in a religious house mere donations? The Legion of Christ raises money as a charity. How does it record such outlays? Does anyone in the Vatican have access to Legion financial records?

When Dziwisz became a bishop in 1998, the Legion covered the costs of his reception at its complex in Rome. "Dziwisz helped the Legion in many ways," said a priest who facilitated payments. "He convinced the pope to celebrate the 50th anniversary of the Legion."

In a book on Maciel published in Spain, journalist Alfonso Torres Robles calls an event on Jan. 3, 1991, "one of the most powerful demonstrations of strength by the Legion ... at St. Peter's Basilica in Rome, when John Paul II ordained 60 Legionaries into the priesthood, in the presence of 7,000 Regnum Christi members from different countries, 15 cardinals, 52 bishops and many millionaire benefactors."

Support independent Catholic journalism.

Support independent Catholic journalism

Maciel had the event filmed and a sequence used in a video the Legion sold until 2006. John Paul was a strategic image in Legion mass mailings and the video shown to potential donors when seminarians accompanied priests to their homes. The Legion no longer circulates the video.

The Legion has a presence in 23 countries, with dozens of elite prep schools, religious formation houses, and several universities.

Maciel's strategy of buying influence unrolled over five decades.

Next: How the empire was built.

[NCR contributor Jason Berry is the author of Lead Us Not into Temptation and coauthor, with the late Gerald Renner, of Vows of Silence . Berry's film documentary "Vows of Silence" explores the saga of the Vatican and Maciel. A grant from the Investigative Fund from The Nation Institute supported research for this article. www.JasonBerryAuthor.com]

Part II: How Fr. Maciel built his empire

Support independent Catholic journalism.

Support independent Catholic journalism

Benedict's Trip to Malta

John Allen is in Rome

I am wondering if it was

I am wondering if it was possible for Benedict as Cardinal to be in a position to do anything while JPII and his Polish friend were in power. Have we got the wrong man here? He got rid of Maciel == that was a good deed. I think we need to know more about how things work in Rome. At least he did not take bribes if that is what this man is telling us.

I too am driven to wonder the

I too am driven to wonder the same thing. Benedict (then-Ratzinger) was the one to blow the whistle on Maciel. Benedict has been the one doing the most to address the sex scandals, bring things out into the light and meet with victims. Benedict (then-Ratzinger) was the one who waived the statute of limitations so Murphy could be investigated in Wisconsin.

All this time we've been slamming on Benedict, when it actually seems like he's been trying to do the right thing.

Maybe its time to ease up on him and look at the 30 years that came before him.

Otherwise it's, you know, like trying to blame Obama for Bush's mistakes.

I would never blame Obama for

I would never blame Obama for Bush's mistakes...Obama has enough of his own! (But admittedly this is off topic...)

"Otherwise it's, you know,

"Otherwise it's, you know, like trying to blame Obama for Bush's mistakes"
...because obviously Obama spent years beforehand working as Bush's lackey? Surely a bit more like blaming Carl Rove for Bush's mistakes...and I do!

What was Ratzinger's role in

What was Ratzinger's role in the delay of the canonical suit by the abused seminarians.

The case was filed in 1998.

Rarzinger did not take action till 2004 and did not take action until 2008.

Why the delay? Isn't this a cover up?

The Maciel case has to be the investiagated further and must be more widely known. It is this case that reveals the awareness by both Ratzinger and John Paul II and other senior Vatican officials of a major sex abuse case, and theri unwillingness to move quickly as decency and jsutic demanded.

What about the seminarians who had to wait 10 years for justice? What about the vilification campaign against them by the Legion?

It is in the Maciel case that we see the true shadow of Ratzinger and John Paul II and the other architects of the conservative retrencment of the church.

Please keep this story on the front pages.

I think that all of the

I think that all of the Cardinals know what was going on - and they all kept quiet because it was lucrative.
The church is obviously corrupt at its highest levels.
It is time for a new Reformation.

What can You Do ???

What can You Do ???

"For years Maciel had Legion

"For years Maciel had Legion priests dole out envelopes with cash and donate gifts to officials in the curia. In the days leading up to Christmas, Legion seminarians spent hours packaging the baskets with expensive bottles of wine, rare brandy, and cured Spanish hams that alone cost upward of $1,000 each. Priests involved in the gifts and larger cash exchanges say that in hindsight they view Maciel's strategy as akin to an insurance policy, to protect himself should he be exposed and to position the Legion as an elite presence in the workings of the Vatican."

And let's not forget CARDINAL RODE's own POUND OF LC PORK:
"Religious centers typically send gifts to church officials in Rome at Christmas, said Father Giovanni Adena, an inactive priest and editor of Adista, an independent religious news service in Rome.
Adena considers the Legion extreme in gift-giving, but he said it has been encouraged by Cardinal Franc Rode, the Vatican prefect in charge of religious orders. “When Rode’s congregation asks groups for gifts, those who want the support will send money and presents. Rode loves this kind of stuff,” said Adena.
Rode has spoken glowingly of the Legion in speeches and sermons since Maciel’s dismissal. In 2007, according to a Legion insider, the cardinal was a guest at a Legion conference in Atlanta on family values, where Jeb Bush was keynote speaker. He said Rode went on to a Legion-paid vacation in Cancun."
http://ncronline.org/news/man-center-storms
http://www.globalpost.com/dispatch/italy/090717/vatican-investigates-leg...

The question that remains to be answered now is what are the results of Archbishop Chaput's official investigation of the Legionaries.

Memo to Chaput:
Are you being as diligent in your investigation of the LC as Mother Millea is in hers?
http://clericalwhispers.blogspot.com/2009/07/vatican-investigates-legion...

Craig, you are absolutely

Craig, you are absolutely correct in all that you wrote. I'd just like to add one item that you wrote about Cardinal Franc Rode and his love of gifts. Another one of the gifts that he accepted from the L.C. (in addition to the trip to Atlanta and vacation to Cancun), was a Mercedes. Hey, nothing but the best!

+Craig, For one who has

+Craig,

For one who has suffered at the hands of the LC here in Chile.How do you know so much about them?You are bang on re Rodé go to youtube and type in Cardenal Rode visits Chile...They are so much up each others arses it is awful...

Pope John Paul the Great

Pope John Paul the Great Enabler.

Money talks.

Even to a pope up for official canonization.

"Scandal," folks???

(i hear a lil' birdy chirping "stinky poo")

As they say, you couldn't

As they say, you couldn't make this up.

One correction: the cardinal who announced the election of Pope Benedict XVI was not Martinez Somalo. That role belongs to the senior cardinal deacon, who in April 2005 was Cardinal Jorge Medina Estevez, a Chilean and former prefect of the Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments. Medina was also known as "Cardinal Pinochet." He was an ally and supporter of the Chilean dictator. The cardinal now lives in retirement in Chile.

Thank you. I am NOT a fan of

Thank you. I am NOT a fan of NCR. They are way too un-faithful to the Faith and The Church.

The fact they can screw up such an easily verifiable, and very well known detail by any organization or group that puts themselves forth as experts on what is going on in Catholicism says all one really needs to know about NCR.

That said, clearly Fr Maciels' was a sick man.

AMDG
HCSKnight

You are mistaking

You are mistaking Faithfulness and Loyalty for Faith in God. Not a smart thing to do if you plan to one day face divine justice or reward.

Relax, I think you are

Relax, I think you are overacting.

Yeah right. Since when did

Yeah right. Since when did the Faithful ever take their faith in God seriously?

Let's face it, if Roman Catholics got off their backsides and started taking personal responsibility for their actions, the Church of Rome would have imploded long ago. The men at the top of any institution are the most scrutinised because they are the most visible.

But every group gets the leaders it deserves. Blaming the leaders for everything is convenient for the Faithful because it means that the Faithful can then protest:

"Well, I had nothing to do with all this! I myself am blameless! I am so shocked! How could this have happened?".

Read the actual reports coming out of Ireland about the children abused by priests and nuns over there. It's clear that in many cases the parents of the abused children either knew what was going on or had a very strong suspicion of it, but they preferred to keep quiet because they lacked the guts even to stand up for their own children. Sheep? Oh yes, sheep indeed.

Yeah right. Since when did

Yeah right. Since when did the Faithful ever take their faith in God seriously?

Let's face it, if Roman Catholics got off their backsides and started taking personal responsibility for their actions, the Church of Rome would have imploded long ago. The men at the top of any institution are the most scrutinised because they are the most visible.

But every group gets the leaders it deserves. Blaming the leaders for everything is convenient for the Faithful because it means that the Faithful can then protest:

"Well, I had nothing to do with all this! I myself am blameless! I am so shocked! How could this have happened?"

Read the actual reports coming out of Ireland about the children abused by priests and nuns over there. It's clear that in many cases the parents of the abused children either knew what was going on or had a very strong suspicion of it, but they preferred to keep quiet because they lacked the guts even to stand up for their own children. Sheep? Oh yes, sheep indeed.

Sounds to me like: "Don't

Sounds to me like: "Don't look a gift horse in the mouth." So typical of political organizations.

How utterly sad...

How utterly sad...

'Something is rotten in the

'Something is rotten in the State of ..........Vatican City? and it's associated organisations and officials?

Clear out the lot of them, they are so far removed from the teachings of Jesus that the hierarchy and most associated are criminals.

I ask myself why I remain in

I ask myself why I remain in a hierarchically controlled church that has so many, many sins that have come to light. it is the people of God who are Church and the sooner we recognize this the better.
God preserve us from these liars of iniquity!
Celine

I would hope that you remain

I would hope that you remain in the Holy Catholic Church because she was founded by Jesus Christ Himself. The Church has gone through previous times of persecution and has suffered before from the sinfulness of it's members. We are all members of the Body of Christ. Some members are more sinful. That does not excuse them, nor the church members who may have allowed their sinfulness to continue, but that does not diminish the validity of the Catholic Church. Christ promised that He would be with His Church until the end of time. They may need to clean house, but the hierarchy was set up by Jesus Christ to be led by one man - a Pope. May God Bless Benedict XVI and guide him in dealing with all of this. May God also bless and comfort the victims all over the world.

Thank you for your post. I

Thank you for your post. I enjoyed reading your perspective. In refering to the hierarchy, you mentioned that "they may need to clean house...". Yes, that clearly is true and something in which we agree, but the question remains; will they? I wish I had confidence that they will, but I can't say that I do. None-the-less, I will join with you in your prayers.

It is nonsense to say that

It is nonsense to say that Christ founded the Holy Catholic Church. He didn't set up a hierarchy. He didn't perform rituals every day in funny costumes. He didn't erect buildings called churches. And he didn't collect money to finance the whole set-up.

It is true that the Roman Catholic Church is not just the Pope and all the pomp. It is also you, the ordinary believer. Anyone who believes all the mumbo jumbo of the Roman Catholic Church is just as complicit in the whole messy shebang as any cardinal who accepts a fat envelope.

However, I know how difficult it is. I myself was brought up in a devout catholic family. It took me a long time and a lot of soul searching before I came to my present position. From where I am now, though, it is as clear as daylight.

You don't have to belong to a Church in order to be a christian.

"You don't have to belong to

"You don't have to belong to a Church in order to be a christian."

Oh, really ? And on what authority do you base that bon mot of wisdom ? Not Scripture, or anything else-- just your own rebellion and inability to commit to any authority other than your own. Christ's teaching is clear. There IS a Church. There are no Lone Ranger Christians.

I'm sorry that you lost your faith. At least you do get this : The Church is what it is. It will not be remade in the image of the Joan Chittisters and Richard McBriens of the world. Take it or leave it. I pray you will one day decide to take it.

Nonsense. The definition of a

Nonsense. The definition of a Christian is anyone who believes that Jesus, in Judaeo-Roman civil law the son of Mary and Joseph, was indeed the Christos, the Anointed One, the Messiah, whose coming was foretold by ancient prophesy; and who then himself takes up the Cross or Burden of Christ, and follows the Christos in his footsteps.

There is no requirement per se to be a member of a community of Christians, thus of a Church, and many of the most devout Christians were in fact anchorites and hermits who turned their back on the community in order to devote themselves to prayer and a life of solitude.

Of course, advocates and apologists for The Christian Church, especially for the corrupt and corrupting Church of Rome will insist that these recluses from the everyday life of others were still de facto members of the Church, but they have a self-interest in such an argument so they would, wouldn't they?

It is only through a life lived in devotion to God, in which one tears oneself away from the temptations of wealth and power, in which one embraces a life of poverty and in which one rejects all the snares presented by human intercourse, that one can come closer to God. And any so-called Church is the greatest snare of all, the invention of the Devil himself.

In 1517 there were so many

In 1517 there were so many people fed up with the years of abuse that given an oportunity they abandonded their RC church. Anything was better than what they had.

Today? Things are no different. The RCC still acts as if it owes nothing to anyone: civil, lay or lowerarchy. The ones on top tend to abuse the innocent and then further abuse even more to hide and keep themselves safe. For what? All in the name of protecting "the church"? How many broken lives, torn souls and how much lost innocence before things change? And don't forget the money as we are seeing in the Legionaries of Christ and Fr Maciel.

The 6th century, the 11th, the 16th and what do we have to show for it? When did you learn about the history of the vatican choir and young boys emasculated in hopes that some would not loose their sweet high voices? Or in my own lifetime, how many like me blindly accepted infalibility, just because they said so?

In my childhood, my parents could not receive Eucharist unless fasting from midnight. That was the rule all through the middle agesuntil the middle of the 20th centrury. Then after changing to 3 hours it was shortened to 1 hour. Do you know who, what, when, why or how? I know the how -- by fiat.

My respect and my training kept me blinded for most of my life. Now I see that the mumbo jumbo is so suspiciously pagan in its form.

I believe in God the father amighty ... I believe in Jesus the Christ ... I believe in the Holy Spirit ... Sometime I can't help but wonder about Rome, they don't seem to trust in whom they proclaim to believe in.

Just to prove I still have a sense of humor, I have a question. As a child I was taught to use the phrase "Holy Ghost" and now the phrase is "Holy Spirit". With the diversion that Rome is creating with turning back the clock on phrases in mass, will the sign of the cross go back to the "Holy Ghost"?

RJ

Funny then how the New

Funny then how the New Testament letters and Acts keep talking about a Church...

Jesus Christ did not found

Jesus Christ did not found the Catholic Church--Jesus was a Jew and died a Jew. The early gathering of followers were a Jewish sect in the beginning but eventually broke off from the Jews. The first gospel was written 40 years after Jesus died. Everything that you read in the New Testament was created by someone who was speaking to the people of his time and culture. None of the gospel writers even knew Jesus. There is no clear indication in the gospels the names of those who actually were called "apostles"--if you write down all the names from each gospel side by side, you will see that none of them agree on the names. Jesus did not set up a hierarchy because his religion already had a hierarchy and they were the called High Priests--again if you read Acts you will see that the only reason a hierarchy was formed was because of the increasing number of "little churches" that were being formed.

If you really want to be surprised, you will note that celibacy was not part of the Catholic church until around the 13th or 14th century and only because bishops were leaving the church's money and property to their families and the church was losing money.

Please read a history of the church.

cfr

Amen to that!

Amen to that!

So Jesus wrote the bylaws of

So Jesus wrote the bylaws of the Catholic Church? Says who? Maybe the Catholic Church? It would be better to try to get rid of this superstition altogether. It has already done enough harm.

Let those who are without sin

Let those who are without sin cast the first stone. We are all sinners, priests being no exception. I think that the Church should learn a lesson from all these clergy sexual scandals and reinforce the priestly formation by means of more strict and prudent screening of candidates. Also, priests should strengthen their personal relationship with the Lord through prayer, meditation, reading of the Scriptures, and mutual care and concern.

Celine, "The people of God

Celine,

"The people of God who are Church," that you mention are sinners too. We also see this displayed in the news papers. This is a part of the human condition. "The sooner we (do) recognize this the better," we will understand that we are sons of God by GRACE. The sweet grace of Christ is what makes a soul beautiful before God. This is what we see reflected in the lives of the true saints like Mother Teresa, St. Francis, etc. Christ himself said, that the weeds and the wheat will grow together until the Judgment. So we shouldn't be dismayed, nor let the evil one sow doubt within our heart about the true nature of the Church. It is still governed by the keeper of "the keys" (Mat 16:19), and "the gates of hell will not prevail against it."

Jesus guaranteed the Gates of

Jesus guaranteed the Gates of Hell would not prevail against the Church. He did not guarentee the Gates of Hell would not prevail against the Papacy or the Vatican.

You are in this Church

You are in this Church because it was founded by Christ. Remember that it is NOT the hierarchy's Church NOR is it OUR Church...it is Christ's Church. Listen, if the Church could survive the betrayal of a hand-picked Apostle (Judas), the denial by the first pope (Peter) and the running away of the others-except for John - it can survive this. We survived Good Friday and we'll survive this PRECISELY because it is CHRIST'S Church! All throughout the Old and New Testaments and the last 2000 years God has chosen and worked with very weak leaders...In Matthew 23:2 Jesus says of the corrupt Jewish leaders to do as they say but don;t follow their example...do as they say because they are on the "chair of Moses." The same follows here, the magsiterium must be followed, but if they give bad example don't follow their example. To leave the Catholic Church because of the corruption of some of its leaders would be spiritually foolish...because we are leaving Christ's Church.

Luke 9:23 "And he said to

Luke 9:23 "And he said to all: If any man will come after me, let him deny himself and take up his cross daily and follow me. " The recent reports just add to the cross.

Celine, Your asking this of

Celine,

Your asking this of yourself is the apostles self-examination on Holy Saturday; the man to whom they had given their lives--who was the Son of God!--was dead. Their trust seemed in vain! But didn't we just celebrate the Resurrection? This is the story of man: to fall, to be battered by the presence of evil in the world (which he himself introduced into the world), to trust in Christ, follow him even to Calvary, and place his hope in Christ, who took up and purified that fallen nature in his Passion, raising it once again to glory in his Resurrection!

I'm very glad you ask yourself why you remain because it shows you take this in deadly earnest--I would agree that it is among the deepest scandals the Church has seen in centuries.

I'm even MORE glad people are encouraging you to remain! The people of God are the Church, and that (vis a vis the saints of the church, like Mother Teresa) is where we can see the presence of the Holy Spirit in the Church, ever calling to you and all the people of God, the torn, bloodied, battered Body of Christ to repent their sins, and take up the redemptive Cross of Christ.

Celine, Ironically these sins

Celine,

Ironically these sins by people in the Church are a sign of the true Church. Recall the parables about "The Kingdom of Heaven" in the thirteenth chapter of Matthew. For Catholics The Kingdom of Heaven is the Catholic Church. Christ likens the Church in these parables to a field of good seed oversown with weed seeds, and to a net full of good and bad fish.

We must endure the bad with the good for now, and uproot the evil in ourselves. For the day is coming: "...at the close of the age. The angels will come out and separate the evil from the righteous, and throw them into the furnace of fire; there men will weep and gnash their teeth." Matthew 13, 49-50.

Nowhere does Christ say that his followers in the present age will all be good, quite the contrary. Thus it has ever been, beginning with Judas. Any Church that pretends to that standard cannot be the true Church.

Hang in there, and pray that you not be put to the test.

Very disturbing but not

Very disturbing but not surprising. When humans forget the divine image we bear and choose to use others for selfish purposes we sin. God forgive us for not taking a stand for good. Holy Spirit help us to be courageous.

Jason, God bless you for

Jason,

God bless you for being on this case and the whole abuse issue for what, 26 years now? You are the dean of reporters on the scandal, by far the most thorough, experienced and balanced.

Without your dogged research with the late Gerald Renner, Maciel could still be on the road to sainthood, so brainwashed are his partisans. Your book prompted the reopening of the canon case against Maciel and the documentary is outstanding. So glad it will be on Irish television shortly. Why doesn't any American media run it?? Come on, Frontline! Wake up.

NOTEWORTHY: I can find no instance where PLACIDO DOMINGO, RICK SANTORUM, MARY ANN GLENDON, WILLIAM BENNETT, JEB BUSH, WILLIAM DONOHUE, CNN reporter DELIA GALLAGHER, and all the other luminaries have publicly disavowed their former support of Maciel and the Legion --- particularly GLENDON. Every one of them owes a meaningful apology to Maciel's survivors (no quickie press statement either). Their silence is deafening and shameful.

And why in hell is the media using Maciel's good-looking priests as commentators? Call Jason Berry instead if you want the truth.

You are assuming that these

You are assuming that these people knew that Maciel was doing these things. They probably feel as betrayed as we all do. Maybe you also noticed that the reporters are well spoken and knowledgeable as well. Judge not lest you be judged.

It is past time to put the

It is past time to put the aura of royallty and royal privlege aside - The emphasis on money, prestiege, pomp and the royal trappings have go to go. When those in authority are so corrupt and unable to actually see the clericalism that creates this corrupiton, it is time for the church to say: enoughQ!!!!!!

This fascination of standing in the shadows of the royal figure is enough to make one sick. Corruption breeds corruption and as power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absoultely. Enough.

I agree with your sentiments

I agree with your sentiments that is why I am a Lutheran.

Unbelievable! I can't

Unbelievable! I can't believe the corruption in the Roman Church. This goes beyond the pale! Disgusting!

Deacon, when you find the

Deacon, when you find the perfect church, join up...aware that once you put your foot in, it will no longer be the perfect church because you are in it.
Sin is disgusting, especially when you can see it in the mirror. There are two options: leave and go somewhere else or stay and work to build the kingdom. Each person must make up their own mind with their own heart. The system stinks but it doesn't have to if we learn as well as criticize.

Anonymous on Apr. 07,

Anonymous on Apr. 07, 2010.

You stated:

"Deacon, when you find the perfect church, join up...aware that once you put your foot in, it will no longer be the perfect church because you are in it.
Sin is disgusting, especially when you can see it in the mirror. There are two options: leave and go somewhere else or stay and work to build the kingdom. Each person must make up their own mind with their own heart. The system stinks but it doesn't have to if we learn as well as criticize."
-----------------------------------------------

My dear Anonymous, you sound like one of the spokespersons for the "stinking system."

What ARE we to learn? Are we to sit in silence and wait for the "stinking system" to correct itself? If it were not for the world-wide media, the lawyers, groups of people and individuals, like the Deacon---speaking up-----NOTHING would be corrected---absolutely nothing. And yet the spokespersons for the "stinking system" keep on criticizing the world media, and everyone else for speaking up---accusing them of being imperfect (just as you accused the Deacon), of not pointing to other sectors of society that are guilty of child/youth abuse, etc.

Considering all the claims the official Church makes about its corner on all revealed truth, that it was founded on the Apostles (all imperfect men---including Peter--not infallible), etc.---it does not operate as a PERFECT Church. Everyone from the Pope on down is a sinner---in need of the grace and salvation generously given by Jesus' redemptive death and resurrection. But that does not mean that this church of our cannot strive to live up to Jesus' expectations of us. It does not mean that we cannot cooperate more fully with the actions of the Holy Spirit. It does not mean that we cannot grow to be the sons and daughters that God has created us to be.

Sitting back like frightened sheep, or being like the "little people" that Pope Benedict likes to envision us as---is not responding to the urgings of the Holy Spirit. She, who is the SPIRIT OF WISDOM that is guiding this Church of ours---is doing major spring house-cleaning. She is inspiring people from all over the world to assist her in cleaning out "the filth" that is clinging to our Church. And if She inspired the good Deacon to speak his mind---who are you to tell him to find another church? He, like many others, has rolled up his sleeves and is assisting the SPIRIT OF WISDOM to clean up the Church from within.

My dear Anonymous, you sound

My dear Anonymous, you sound like one of the spokespersons for the "stinking system."

What ARE we to learn? Are we to sit in silence and wait for the "stinking system" to correct itself? If it were not for the world-wide media, the lawyers, groups of people and individuals, like the Deacon---speaking up-----NOTHING would be corrected---absolutely nothing. And yet the spokespersons for the "stinking system" keep on criticizing the world media, and everyone else for speaking up---accusing them of being imperfect (just as you accused the Deacon), of not pointing to other sectors of society that are guilty of child/youth abuse, etc.

Considering all the claims the official Church makes about its corner on all revealed truth, that it was founded on the Apostles (all imperfect men---including Peter--not infallible), etc.---it does not operate as a PERFECT Church. Everyone from the Pope on down is a sinner---in need of the grace and salvation generously given by Jesus' redemptive death and resurrection. But that does not mean that this church of our cannot strive to live up to Jesus' expectations of us. It does not mean that we cannot cooperate more fully with the actions of the Holy Spirit. It does not mean that we cannot grow to be the sons and daughters that God has created us to be.

Sitting back like frightened sheep, or being like the "little people" that Pope Benedict likes to envision us as---is not responding to the urgings of the Holy Spirit. She, who is the SPIRIT OF WISDOM that is guiding this Church of ours---is doing major spring house-cleaning. She is inspiring people from all over the world to assist her in cleaning out "the filth" that is clinging to our Church. And if She inspired the good Deacon to speak his mind---who are you to tell him to find another church? He, like many others, has rolled up his sleeves and is assisting the SPIRIT OF WISDOM to clean up the Church from within.

There would be much less of what you call "accusing" if we did not demand of others what we do not ask of ourselves. The "good deacon" judges but offered nothing learned, except the freedom to publish a judgement of his own. He is certainly free to do that if he also accepts the response of those who seek more.

LittleBear, Thank you for

LittleBear, Thank you for this comment. Check out Oakland, CA Fr. Tim Stier. He's another who has got the courage and is speaking out.

The Holy See has been in the

The Holy See has been in the hands of corrupt gang. It decay has started with increasing speed. This is good. I prefer even Islam more healhty than sick roman catholic church

As the numbers are showing

As the numbers are showing Catholic priests are accused of abuse at only half (or less)the rate of average men; and as the Catholic Church is shown to have no greater rate of sexual abuse than other Christian communities; and as the Catholic Church has already begun rapid reform, screening procedures, and methods of reporting in the United States; and as most of the abuse allegations come from leftist era of Church theology and governance in the 60s-90s, it would seem that we might conclude that the Catholic Church is now becoming ever more pure and healthy. Don't be afraid to hope!

Isn't that an incredible

Isn't that an incredible story. One important lesson to be learned is that Marcel, a man of charisma, wealth, and power, could even dupe the pope himself. Now we must ask the hard questions: What about the other cult-like religious groups JPII supported? What about Opus Dei, Divine Mercy, and others? Let them be audited now to avoid asking ourselves in several years time, why didn't we know enough to check them all outback in 2010?

Brother Ed, Why do you think

Brother Ed,

Why do you think JPII was 'duped?'

I am a bit concerned and very interested in the huge push for JPII's canonization. Why the rush?

Sorry to be so Thomistic (as in the Apostle) but little that comes from Church Leadership over the past 20 years or so is especially encouraging.

GHFisher: JPII was duped by

GHFisher: JPII was duped by Fr. Maciel because he accepted him at face value as a holy man and a efficacious guide to youth - when Fr. M was anything BUT. JPII also didn't heed the tales told about Fr. M but continued to support him, appear in videos with him, etc. JPII was a victim just like the others who trusted this blackguard Maciel. Now, I say, let's check out the others JPII supported "just to be safe."

Excellent point Bro. Ed -

Excellent point Bro. Ed - better to purify as much as possible now, as it will all come out eventually. Thank you for that important addition to the discussion.

Thank you, Jason Berry, for a

Thank you, Jason Berry, for a stunning and bold investigation. Your 1997 article began my exodus from Regnum Christi and I've been watching as the whole enterprise revealed itself as fouler and bigger than anyone had ever imagined. I heard from more than a few former Legionaries that they will "target" someone they want to "win over" and go after him, repeatedly, and from many angles. They do not stop until he has become their "friend." In this way, the late Fr. Neuhaus was "conquered" (their word). I wrote to Fr. Neuhaus and told him of my negative experiences with the Legion; he wrote back that I was "spreading feathers of scandal" which were base slander against a holy man and calamny against an order that did so much good in the world. I asked him in reply if he would have said the same thing to Alexander Solzhenitsyn when he wrote of the horrible evil that was hidden behind the pleasant fake-facades of Communist Russia's "potemkin villages"? It was grievous to see a good priest like Fr. Neuhaus, who defended truth all of his life, having been dupped by the Legionary lie. The lie continues behind the hundreds of "front organizations" that are to be found on the Regnum Christi sites; it looks so good and continues to raise money and to recruit. How long will this travesty continue? Our Pope Benedict XVI has one shot to get this right -- for those who helped Maciel build this Evil Empire continue to threaten the world and to have designs on the Papacy. Yet, he alone has been man enough to defend the Church against this systemic evil. Viva il Papa! Hooray for him for being a true father and Vicar of Christ!

Perhaps Fr. Neuhaus was also

Perhaps Fr. Neuhaus was also given envelopes for his 'charitable' work.

This is a disgraceful comment

This is a disgraceful comment damaging the good name of an excellent priest, about whom there is no trace of scandal. Fr Neuhaus was clearly deceived,and many good people like him also were. Please substantiate or withdraw this comment.

CDH, thank you for your

CDH, thank you for your comment. Yet, I see Fr Neuhaus's defense of the founder a bit of a scandal ("moral certainity"). And if that wasn't enough, the venom of his personal attacks to those who were sexually abused and to those who first reported this is, indeed, a scandal. It is one of the problems with a cult-like vereration of someone, which it seems that Fr. Neuhaus had for the founder of the Legion.

"Yet, I see Fr Neuhaus's

"Yet, I see Fr Neuhaus's defense of the founder a bit of a scandal ("moral certainity")."

Interesting. I think the words Neuhaus used were "morally defensible" when giving his imprimatur to the Vatican and USCCB opposed Bush stem-cell compromise in 2001. This compromise made possible the federal funding of stem-cell research for the very first time and was most certainly both a scandal and an embarrassment to serious Catholics everywhere. In his haste to offer moral cover to his political allies at the time, Neuhaus appears conveniently to have overlooked the clear instructions of Donum Vitae, to wit:

"The corpses of human embryos and foetuses, whether they have been deliberately aborted or not, must be respected just as the remains of other human beings."

There was simply is no way for Neuhaus to wiggle out of that dilema, yet he and his pals at First Things valiently tried. Yet no amount of rationalizing about the embryos being dead at the time of the experimentation, no facile dealing with the complicity question, can ever excuse what he endorsed at that time: The dismemberment and desecration of human corpses. It would seem that his defense of child abusers was considerably more comprehensive than anyone might have suspected.

Well, if funding for the

Well, if funding for the First Things project is any measure there certainly have been "envelopes" sent Neuhaus' way, not necessarily from Marciel or his agents, but certainly from neo-con foundations, from 1990 to 2005 alone, $8,217,500, to be exact. And you've been scratching your head, perhaps, as to why Neuhaus so enthusiastically shilled for the aggression against Iraq and couldn't quite find an critical word to say about the Vatican opposed Bush stem-cell compromise in 2001? If in recent years we've seen the rise of a kind of latter day ReichsChurch in this country, you'd certainly have to consider Neuhaus one of its charter members. A strange sort of "orthodoxy", his.

He's still milking money out

He's still milking money out of people! How do I get my 84 year-old father to quit sending money to them when all their literature shows dozens of seminarians, children, who are being taken from their homes and brain washed? Do they still take the "Private vows" that no one can criticize the order? Are their seminaries being scrutinized and visited?

That private vow has been

That private vow has been abolished by Benedict XVI.

What can we do if the fence

What can we do if the fence itself eats the crop ? I think there is no way of stpping the pervertions of people. Can we find fault with Jesus or the Church ? Men have become a sort of devil lovers. Simple life style, avoidance of luxuries, abstinence from sex outside marriage a willingness to uphold truth and justice at all cost are the ways for a reform of persons and society. Who will propagate this ? At least in principle only catholic church is the advocate

And the Vatican dares to

And the Vatican dares to investigate the American religious sisters?
Good God.
No wonder Jesus wept.

The logic leap here is

The logic leap here is astounding. More like bizarre.

These are American Sisters

These are American Sisters who are acting as "deathscorts" for abortion clinics, lobbying for taxpayer funding of abortion, practicing Reiki, promoting contraceptives and calling for female ordination. They deserve the investigation.

Dear Deni, A few things need

Dear Deni,

A few things need reality-check in your comment. First and foremost you seem to link "taxpayer funding of abortion" to a public endorsement of the health care bill recently made law. This appears to be a logical gaffe. It has been demonstrated repeatedly that the health care bill and abortion-funding are not inclusive of each other.

Secondly you assume that each of the items you list are universally considered morally odious. Not so. Like so many things in our times, most are issues of moral complexity and not settled or simple issues. Good people everywhere differ on their "take" of them. How can you single out U.S. Sisters in this regard? Why they only need "investigation?"

The link between support for

The link between support for taxpayer funding of abortion and the public endorsement of the Health care bill is unmistakable. The U.S. sisters who supported the bill knew full well and were complicit in the Government's lies to Americans and American Catholics that the bill does fund abortions through accounting tricks.

As for the other matters that Joan seems to think are morally ambiguous, certainly they are morally ambiguous in a morally ambiguous world, but the Catholic Church has set doctrines and beliefs and the Church does declare these things are morally odious in spite of what some rebellious nuns, baptized pagans, and people who are enemies of Christ and the Church say.

In the instance of one sister who fought against the investigations into her order because she chooses to believe that vows of celibacy don't extend to her if she's engaged in sexual unions with people of the same sex, it was her stated opinion that what she believed was in violation of Church teaching but it was NOT in violation of her conscience.

The so-called logic in this whole sub-thread is that no sin should be investigated and brought into subjection to Christ and the Church if any other sin has been hidden which in a word is STUPID. And the second flaw in this sub-thread is the notion that God's rules as given through Christ, the Apostles, and the Prophets in the magisterium, in the Traditions of the Church, and in the Bible are subject to the individual whims and "votes" of people at any point in history. In addition,the document Dei Verbum makes it very clear in its opening statements that the common argument used today that "times change" has no bearing on our notions of morality. Very plainly, for those who say "If the Bible were written today, it wouldn't be so dogmatic", the various parts of the Bible were written for all time at the specific time in history of God's choosing. When Joan claims that "good people everywhere" disagree on the issues mentioned, I take offense. Heretics are NOT due the honor of the title "GOOD people".

Deni... GET REAL!!! How many

Deni...

GET REAL!!! How many Religious woman do you know who escort women to
abortion clinics and lobby for taxpayer funding for abortion? As for
"Reike" do you even know what Reike is? For the few "deathscorts" you
know...American Religious thoughout the county deserve "The Inqisition" ????
I don't think so!!!

Thank You for this needed

Thank You for this needed exposee.

Post new comment

NCR Comment code:

  1. Be respectful. Do not attack the writer. Take on the idea, not the messenger.
  2. Use appropriate language. Avoid vulgarities and slurs.
  3. Keep to the point. Deliberate digressions don't aid the discussion.

For more detailed guidelines, visit our User Guidelines page.

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
(if you have one; if not, leave this blank)
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <font> <swf> <swf list>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You may use <swf file="song.mp3"> to display Flash files inline

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This is to prove you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.