Twitter - Facebook - Email Alerts - RSS
Mass. man sues Catholic bishops over sex abuse
NORTHAMPTON, Mass. -- A Massachusetts man is suing two former bishops of the Springfield, Mass., diocese and another church administrator for allegedly allowing him to be molested by a priest who had admitted to sexually abusing other boys.
Lawyers for the alleged victim say it is perhaps the first U.S. case that involves a defendant who is an accused molester charged with overseeing another accused molester.
Andrew Nicastro, 38, of Williamstown, said the former Rev. Alfred Graves sexually molested him between 1982 and 1984, when Nicastro was 11 to 13 years old. Graves, who has been named as an abuser in other suits filed against the diocese, was suspended from active ministry in the 1990s and officially defrocked by the Vatican in 2006.
The suit names as defendants Bishop Joseph Maguire, who led the Springfield diocese at the time of the allegations, Bishop Thomas Dupre, who was chancellor and third in command, and Richard Sniezyk, who was vicar for priests and had a supervisory role over Graves.
Dupre resigned after he was indicted in 2004 on charges of abusing two boys during the 1970s. The cases were dropped when prosecutors determined they were too old to prosecute. Dupre is currently at a Maryland treatment center for troubled priests.
Mark Dupont, a spokesman for the diocese, said it would be imprudent to comment on the specifics of the case prior to a thorough review.
According to the suit, the parents of a young boy told Maguire in 1976 that their son had been sexually molested by Graves while he was assigned to Our Lady of Hope Church in Springfield. Although Graves admitted to Maguire that he had molested the boy, the bishop merely warned him "to not do it again," the suit states. Graves was subsequently transferred, eventually ending up at St. Patrick's in Williamstown in 1981, where he served as the pastor.
Nicastro's lawyer, John Stobierski, said his investigation has uncovered writings that show Maguire knew about Graves' history of molesting boys.
"For the first time, we have solid proof that the hierarchy of the diocese knew Alfred Graves molested children before he was assigned to a parish where Mr. Nicastro and others were located," he said.
After a barrage of lawsuits earlier this decade, the suit is one of the few civil complaints filed against the diocese in the last four years. The diocese paid out $7.7 million to dozens of claimants in 2004 and another $4.5 million to 59 alleged abuse victims last year. Those costs were offset by an $8.5 million settlement between the diocese and three insurance companies.




The bishops need to be
The bishops need to be investigated, charged if guilty and punished. We must not forgo charging and convicting guilty clergy. Being a cleric must not give those men a free pass to victimize our youth, our children and our vulnerable adults (less powerful church employees, seminarians, younger priests, schoolboys, altar boys,orphans, catechist students, church activity children that have fallen victim to these abusers).
If the abusers were librarians, or retail workers, or schoolteachers, or factory workers they would be charged. Why do clergy continue to get away with this predation of others, so they can re-offend again with new victims.
And I'm sure that the money
And I'm sure that the money he may get if he wins, or the diocese settles, will heal him from his abuse and make everything right. And, I'm sure that they money he may get will be better used by him and his lawyers than by the diocese in working to feed the hungry, clothe the naked, educate the young, care for the sick, etc.
But, then again, what are the works of mercy compared to making a fast buck off of your childhood suffering?
How dare you respond with
How dare you respond with such callousness!! Your attitude is absolutely as despicable as the attitude of bishops and priests who took exactly the same attitude when it came to protecting children against sex abusers. They thought that protecting the reputation of the church was far more important than protecting children. Paying money is exactly the first step in healing and in making amends, whether you see it or not. What he does with the money is his business. But money is not the last step. Those bishops and priests have so much more to pay for the sex crimes they committed, not only against children, but against the entire church. They cannot pay out too much as far as I'm concerned. They stole from these children, just as much as they stole from the very poor you are so concerned about.
This post is really mean
This post is really mean spirited. Truly the most unCatholic thing I have ever read... Please refraze in a more morally compelling manor. Think of your adversary as someone in need of the Spiritual Works of Mercy - yourself as well.
From your comment, Clint
From your comment, Clint Green, I would not be surprised to find out you are an American Catholic Bishop using a psuedonym. When I contacted my bishop about the depravity and arrogance of the priests and bishops involved in this sexual abomination perpetrated upon the young, his official priest-spokesman said the exact same words as you used! It is probably too late now, but all bishops, and I mean ALL, should resign their bishoprics in an attempt to restore some shred of credibility to what pretends to be Christian leadership. Let's be honest, those bishops who were not involved in the cover-up themselves personally, knew what their fellow bishops were doing and did NOTHING. So, with this lack of action were they defending the reputation of "Holy Mother the Church" or trying to keep their high office? The Jesus who was trying to teach us different ways of being spiritual, would have his "Holy Mother the Church" on the phone calling the police to have these offenders arrested.
You're sure pretty glib about
You're sure pretty glib about dismissing the sufferings of others. How dare you lay the needs of the poor at this victim's feet? Can these bishops make this person whole again? Can they take the suffering away? No - they've shown themselves pretty much incapable of even doing the administrative part of their jobs. Money is the only thing these guys have to offer their victim. Money is probably the only lesson they will understand.
If the church has to pay for the mistakes/negligence of its leaders in addition to the needs of the poor - well then, perhaps it may learn to choose its leaders more wisely. Then again, it may not learn anything.
...and Judas said: why waste
...and Judas said: why waste this ointment, it could be sold & the money given to the poor. (he said this because he was in charge of the purse & stole money from it)...Jesus ansuwered: Leave her alone......
Post new comment