Cloyne Report fallout: Vatican recalls nuncio from Ireland

Jul. 25, 2011
Archbishop Giuseppe Leanza was received in Dublin as papal nuncio to Ireland in 2008. (CNS)

VATICAN CITY -- In an exceptional move, the Vatican recalled its nuncio to Ireland so that he could participate in meetings aimed at drafting the Vatican's formal response to an Irish government report on clerical sex abuse.

Following the publication July 13 of the so-called Cloyne Report "and, particularly, after the reactions that followed, the secretary of state has recalled the apostolic nuncio in Ireland, Archbishop Giuseppe Leanza, for consultations," the Vatican said in a statement July 25.

Passionist Father Ciro Benedettini, vice director of the Vatican press office, said recalling the nuncio "denotes the seriousness of the situation, the desire of the Holy See to face it with objectivity and determination, as well as a certain note of surprise and disappointment over some excessive reactions" to the report and its accusations against the Vatican.

The Cloyne Report, which examined how the Diocese of Cloyne handled accusations of clerical sexual abuse, said the bishop paid "little or no attention" to child safeguarding as recently as 2008 and that he falsely told the government his diocese was reporting all allegations of abuse to the civil authorities.

The report also accused the Vatican of being "entirely unhelpful" to Irish bishops who wanted to implement stronger norms for dealing with accusations and protecting children.

Addressing parliament July 20, Irish Prime Minister Enda Kenny said the Cloyne Report "exposes an attempt by the Holy See to frustrate an inquiry in a sovereign, democratic republic as little as three years ago."

"And in doing so, the Cloyne Report excavates the dysfunction, disconnection, elitism and the narcissism that dominate the culture of the Vatican to this day," the prime minister said.

After the prime minister spoke, Jesuit Father Federico Lombardi, Vatican spokesman, issued a statement calling for greater objectivity in discussing "topics so dramatic" because the first concern of all should be "the safeguarding of children and of young people and the renewal of a climate of trust and collaboration" between church and state.

In announcing the recall of the nuncio, Father Benedettini said the Vatican Secretariat of State wanted to ensure its response to the Cloyne Report was serious and complete, and to do that it was necessary that "the person on the scene," Archbishop Leanza, take part in drafting discussions along with officials from the congregations for the doctrine of the faith, religious, clergy and bishops.

Preview NCR's Family Life Issue

Watch this video from NCR Editor Dennis Coday for highlights from our annual Family Life special section.

You won't find these articles on our website. Subscribe now to receive all the content from each biweekly issue.

He said the Vatican expects to forward its formal response to the Irish government before the end of August.

In a statement July 25, Irish Foreign Minister Eamon Gilmore said, "The decision to recall the papal nuncio to the Vatican for consultations is a matter for the Holy See. The government is awaiting the response of the Holy See to the recent report into the Catholic Diocese of Cloyne and it is to be expected that the Vatican would wish to consult in depth with the nuncio on its response."

A day earlier, Kenny told a crowd during a visit to County Donegal he had received "thousands of messages from around the world" supporting his comments.

"The numbers of members of the clergy who have been in touch in the last few days, to say it is about time somebody spoke out about these matters in a situation like you are, has astounded me," Kenny added.

"I have haven't made any other comments except to say that we await the response from the Vatican," he said.

[Contributing to this story was Michael Kelly in Dublin. ]

Archbishop Leanza was

Archbishop Leanza was "recalled", as he was probably about to be expelled
from Irish soil, as he should be!

Rome will respond to

Rome will respond to "excesses" with "obhectivity and determination"
How good of them.

Yes, Rome should respond with

Yes, Rome should respond with objectivity, because Kenny’s statement lacked any objectivity, and lacked genuine concern for the victims. Kenny is an opportunist and hypocrite as many politicians are these days. He is presiding over a country where child sexual abuse is pretty much an epidemic, 30.4% of girls and 23.6% of boys are sexually abused prior to their age of 18 (SAVI Report, 2002), and he is singling out the Catholic Church for not complying with a nonexistent law of mandatory reporting.

I know it is easy to score political points these days by attacking the Church and the Vatican, bust such blatant opportunism I find revolting. Kenny, as the prime minister of the country, should feel responsible for the ongoing abuse in Ireland, for the many victims who are suffering from it as we speak, instead, he is trying to make an example of a few deranged priests in the past. He is not really concerned about the victims. He is concerned about political gain.

When the church loses the

When the church loses the Irish, brother and sister, you'd better pray.

No, if the Irish lose the

No, if the Irish lose the Church, brother and sister, you'd better pray.

No, if the Irish lose the

No, if the Irish lose the Church, brother and sister, you'd better pray.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

No, after 15 centuries of superstition, blasphemy, idolatry, and authoritarianism, "brother and sister" should be singing glad Hosannas followed by a solemn Te Deum that they're losing the Church.

Many of the Irish would

Many of the Irish would probably tell you they've already run to safety...but perhaps they're just being "excessive" about protecting children.

I don't see how any reaction

I don't see how any reaction to clergy sexual abuse anywhere can be deemed "excessive". An excessive reaction might be to move Bernard Law from the US to the Vatican and then put him in charge of one of the 4 major basilicas in Rome. Now that was a little excessive.

Iuvenis, Law got the new job

Iuvenis, Law got the new job because he probably brought a bag full of Boston money with him and bought the best job money could buy.

The faithful Irish have the

The faithful Irish have the courage to stand for the truth. The Vatican is Cosa Nostra, not Christ. This must change or the Catholic Church as desired by the reactionaries will be a dead dinosaur. In the meanwhile, the Holy Spirit is gently blowing through the community of believers and will hopefully prevail soon. Eve

The "Catholic population", as

The "Catholic population", as a group--- are neither "the people of God" nor a "community of believers."

If they were so--- they wouldn't claim to be Roman Catholics.

I love it, how everybody is

I love it, how everybody is referring to the Holy Spirit to call others names and promote their own, often bigoted, personal political agendas. They love to forget that one of the first sign of the presence of the Spirit is unity.

Unity is also a sign of a

Unity is also a sign of a people who are soporific and find comfort in consensus. Closing their eyes and their minds to evil all around. Always a fertile ground for the likes of a Hitler.

Premier Kenny's break with Rome illustrates how 1500 years of ignorance, superstition, and idolatry have finally caught up with the Catholic Church. With the devout suddenly waking up from their slumbers induced by the crafty machinaitons of priests and bishops.

And they're heading your way

And they're heading your way for the Eucharistic Congress, it has just been released, irrespective of the call for postponement due to the Cloyne Report.
Surely this isn't Benedicts idea, if it is the message to just bullock on regardless, and never give up is loud and clear.

"After the prime minister

"After the prime minister spoke, Jesuit Father Federico Lombardi, Vatican spokesman, issued a statement calling for greater objectivity in discussing "topics so dramatic" because the first concern of all should be "the safeguarding of children and of young people and the renewal of a climate of trust and collaboration" between church and state.".... The Vatican "first concern" is the safeguarding of children? Hahahahaha. That's the best laugh I've gotten in many a year. Safeguarding children has never been the Vatican's or the Bishops first concern. It's always been about protecting themselves and their power.

"And in doing so, the Cloyne

"And in doing so, the Cloyne Report excavates the dysfunction, disconnection, elitism and the narcissism that dominate the culture of the Vatican to this day," the prime minister said.

IT WOULD SEEM FROM THE PRIME MINISTER'S STATEMENT THAT THE WORLD (IRELAND AT LEAST) IS BEGINNING TO REALIZE THE TRUTH ABOUT THE "GOOD 'OL BOY" CULTURE IN THE VATICAN. I SINCERELY BELIEVE WE NEED CONCECRATED RELIGIOUS WOMEN RUNNING THE CHURCH. THEY ARE MUCH MORE IN TOUCH WITH THE PEOPLE OF GOD THAN THE POPE, CARDINALS AND BISHOPS WHO HAVE LITTLE, IF ANY CONTACH WITH THE EVERY DAY CATHOLIC.

BROTHER LUKE

Excuse me, but haven't you

Excuse me, but haven't you noticed how well women religious have also responded to the abuse that their members have engaged in over the years? It just isn't the ol' boys who are protecting their...assets...the ol' gals are pros at it too! It's not a male or female thing...it's a "we're special" mentality among many priest and religous regardless of their gender!

Is this not what is called

Is this not what is called sexism?

Perhaps it is time to

Perhaps it is time to withdraw recognition of the Vatican and re-call the Irish ambassador until such time that the Vatican becomes more open and honest.

There is no need for a

There is no need for a temporary suspension of diplomatic relations - it needs to be permanent. What purpose does it serve to have an ambassador from this tinpot little theme park of dinosaurs?
Peter Downie, Australia

The "surprise" that I

The "surprise" that I experience, although I should know better by this time, is the Vatican's continuing attitude of not seeming to understand the depth of this child abuse crisis. I seem to note that there is always a tone of being victimized, persecuted, from the Vatican. When, in fact, the situation is quite the opposite. Indeed, the church authorities have protected abusers for many long decades, while little children have suffered horribly. Yet the Vatican still does not completely acknowledge the pain it has caused.

I'm going to keep writing

I'm going to keep writing this until my fingers bleed.

The Vatican (the whole Roman hierarchy) will never truly understand deep and heart-wrenching parental concern because they themselves have not chosen to be parents. In addition to the natural love that accompanies bearing/adopting/rearing children, there is the overwhelming factor of the responsibility inherent in becoming a parent.

Excluding those sad individuals with deep psychoses and those who have never known a healthy family life and thus are unable to create one of his/her own, "most" parents will literally lay down their lives to protect their children from serious harm. I doubt this can be said by many celibate men who have taken another road, no matter how beckoned and blessed they may have been on their journey.

Without experiencing this unique bond between parent and child, the abuse situation remains just a bit too abstract to provide real understanding. Indeed, their closest bonds may be with their peers, which may simply reinforce the culture of clericalism and even abuse.

Sometimes in-depth psychological studies just plain ignore common sense and common experience.

Your point is without merit.

Your point is without merit. You try to set up parents as a class who wouldn't abuse. Nothing could be further from the truth. Being a parent doesn't stop a person from abusing some one else's child. I don't dispute the special bond between parent & child. I believe that abuse by parents of their genetic children in a marriage situation is very rare indeed.

But so what? Most abuse is done by married men. The second category is abuse by the live-in boyfriend. I've often read of live-in boyfriends killing children. Celibate males are a distant third. Why focus on the celibate male? So you can attack the Church? It is said that 25% of girls are abused before the age of 18. Most of this abuse occurs within families.

Those who abuse have problems & these problems override the natural concern anyone should feel for a child. So from this angle too, your point is irrelevant.

Indeed any celibate person has known the parent child relationship in reverse. Usually this is a very strong relationship. Only from a family of deep love would a person choose a religious vocation. So the celibate leadership is attuned to the horror of abuse, much more so than many married people who more often than not, do not have a good relationship with their own parents.

You try to set up parents as

You try to set up parents as a class who wouldn't abuse. Nothing could be further from the truth. Being a parent doesn't stop a person from abusing some one else's child. I don't dispute the special bond between parent & child. I believe that abuse by parents of their genetic children in a marriage situation is very rare indeed.

But so what? Most abuse is done by married men. The second category is abuse by the live-in boyfriend. I've often read of live-in boyfriends killing children. Celibate males are a distant third. Why focus on the celibate male? So you can attack the Church? It is said that 25% of girls are abused before the age of 18. Most of this abuse occurs within families.

Let the heavens now prepare to open and the sky to fall, because I find myself in almost (I stress almost) total agreement with Paulte in the above quoted statement.

Whence, therefore, all your previous vindictive comments trying to link child abuse to homosexuality?

People are disgusted with

People are disgusted with "the Vatican", they just don't get it.

Whether or not PM Kenny of

Whether or not PM Kenny of Ireland is right in his denunciations of the "dysfunction, disconnection, elitism and the narcissism that dominate the culture of the Vatican to this day," he is unfortunately not alone. It remains to be seen whether Rome will take this opportunity to learn why so many people continue (rightly or wrongly) to distrust it. In any case, it should at least ask itself seriously why such misapprehensions (if that's what they are) are possible. The reaction to the Cloyne report once again presents the Vatican with an opportunity to learn something useful from the outside world -- and indeed from many of the Catholic faithful. Whether it chooses to listen, or once again to harden its heart, is, of course, its own choice.

Thank God someone has has the

Thank God someone has has the guts to stand up to the Vatican bullying. The Church will be stronger and spiritually richer as a result.

It seems that it is about

It seems that it is about time to let go of the Holy Roman Empire and all of the trappings that go with it; Ambassadors, Nuncios, and all of the titles of royalty. We are a church - a community of the faithful - the people of God. All of this other stuff is a sign of Constantine and the church that arose during the middle ages, owning almost all of Italy, crowing kings, etc. We are a community of sinners - all raised to new life; transformed into the body and blood of Christ to feed the world starving for life. The credibility of the Church seems to demand a transformation in the institution.

Amen

Amen

You have a great insight

You have a great insight Charles into what is at the root of the problems of the church leaders. They do not accept that the church is the "People of God". All of us sinners. No other class here. The Vatican and Bishops live out an erroneous church self definition. I am not sure all of that will not have to die of it's heretical errors. Only the lowly will be saved in a renewed ecumenical church. Or as you said so much better, "all raised to new life; transformed into the body and blood of Christ to feed the world starving for life.

It is not transformation of

It is not transformation of institutions that Christ gave us the gospel of grace for, but the transformation of men and women, boys and girls.

Well said, Charles Bolser,

Well said, Charles Bolser, you have gone right to the heart of the matter. Peter Downie, Australia

Very well spoken!

Very well spoken!

Great points Charles Bolser.

Great points Charles Bolser. The Church hierarchy never feels more secure than when it can succeed in maintaining secrecy at all levele of decision-making, carefully nurtures a culture of unquestioning obedience, and surrounds anti-democratic institutions with an aura of sanctity, indispensable to the Faith, and firmly in the hands of the pope and the bishops.

This obtuse, ancient, rigid system is crumbling. We see it happening in the pope's own backyard and in Spain and Ireland. Once THE most Catholic countries in Europe.

Modernity and reform will be slow in coming, but the match has been lit and we're seeing the greatest revolution since Luther and the reformers spreading like a firestorm.

Good for the Irish! Maybe,

Good for the Irish! Maybe, just maybe these horrible issues will be addressed and the Vatican will finally get it and begin the reform it needs to regain our trust. We can only hope.

"After the prime minister

"After the prime minister spoke, Jesuit Father Federico Lombardi, Vatican spokesman, issued a statement calling for greater objectivity in discussing "topics so dramatic" because the first concern of all should be "the safeguarding of children and of young people and the renewal of a climate of trust and collaboration" between church and state."

There has been no collaboration except for hollow words between the Vatican and anyone when it comes to protecting children. The Vatican has proven itself untrustworthy over and over as it ignores innocent children while only trying to protect pedophile priests. I hope more governments become involved in the crimes of the Vatican and its pedophile protectors. In a court of law or public opinion, repeatedly being caught in lies undermines ones credibility. I can't wait to see the Vatican bull machine's response to the Irish prime minister report?

Enda Kenny's speech has been

Enda Kenny's speech has been a needed beacon, finally an elected official who speaks truth to the power of the Vatican.

I feel saddened by this whole

I feel saddened by this whole world wide problem of sex abuse, and hope the church has learned you don.t solve serious problems by trying to cover up the crime and protecting the guilty. The clergy, like everyone else, have to be ready to face the consequences for their actions.

Like everyone else -- you

Like everyone else -- you mean the nuns, right? The nuns who molested thousands of children in Ireland, the USA, etc.? You believe in being inclusive, don't you? Of course, you do.

A very strong, welcome and

A very strong, welcome and much appreciated message was delivered by Prime Minister Enda Kenny of Ireland. It is very welcome indeed. I have sent the article by Maureen Dowd in the New York Times (The End of Awe)to many people. I have listened to the speech by Kenny on Youtube. It is something that needed to be said. The Vatican should realize that with the world of communication that we have now, we are going to need a church that responds to criticism by dialogue and reflection rather than defense and punishment.

The laity is being educated, reading scripture, reading the newpaper and the internet, and is instantly aware of some change or conflict. It is a changing world and there should be a changing church to keep up.

Virginia Edman

Please God, may the Vatican

Please God, may the Vatican reply with humility and shame instead of going all defensive. If it does not, then its image of power and arrogance and being out of touch is further enhanced instead of humble and concerned service in the manner of Christ being presented. The damage to the body of Christ is mirrored in the abuse of the bodies of Christ's little ones.

"Holy" See?

"Holy" See?

A good house cleaning is long

A good house cleaning is long overdue at the Vatican, and it is time for the silence of the priests--especially in the United States--to be broken. Why are they so afraid to speak truth to power? Fidelity is due to God/Christ not the pope and the hierarchy who have long abandoned the Gospel example of Jesus as He lived it.

If a priest speaks out to

If a priest speaks out to 'confront power' he will be immediately 'thrown under the bus'. His job and his means of survival will be taken away in the speediest manner possible. It is clear that the vast majority of Catholics have little knowledge of how the RCC hierarchy operates in relation to its own priests. There are approximately 500 priests in limbo,right now, with no formal assignment because they dared to speak even in a mildly critical way. Some live in old trailers or in monasteries where they have no jurisdiction of any kind. It is a lot more like the Mafia than anything Jesus Christ had in mind.

Power corrupts and absolute

Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Is there something about the color purple that brings about the worst in some men? The stories of arrogance and insensitivity on the part of the Church's elete are so often repeated that we are now getting used to it. Their credibility as moral stewards is in shambles. Men and women of conscience are speaking out. We need to listen to them and let their voice be ours. Evil cannot exist in the bright light of the truth.

Cheers to Prime Minister

Cheers to Prime Minister Kenny! At last there is a leader with enough courage to stand up to the Vactican. This is especially significant coming from one who is a member of the Roman Catholic church and telling the Pope that the Irish government is not going to put up with their antics.

Ratzinger, Bertone, Levada,

Ratzinger, Bertone, Levada, Hoyos, Law.... c'mout wi yer hands up!!!

:}

:}

Up to this time and for many

Up to this time and for many many years the all-powerful liberal lobby within the Church continues to steadily downplay sin and its terrible consequences in favor of episcopal independence and self-described "unbiased listening". This crisis hits, and the same folks shout that Rome should act with all force and that they co-incident shout that such sin is worthy of hellfire. Liberal minded folks seem by their teachings as well as published catechetical materials to have removed the terrible truth of reality of hell these past 40 years in favor of a kind of metaphor. If honest, these folks might as well publicly acknowledge that they have actually embraced post-modernism and are ready to say goodbye to philosophical realism.. In layperson's words "I'm OK Jack, tough on you beloved..." I find this to be a betrayal of the idea of a common-sense up-to-date and vital Catechetical encompassing catholic faith and morals which is deeply embued with Apostolic Tradition, Magisterial Teaching and Biblical. Pray for all concerned...

Somehow I think you are

Somehow I think you are trying to equate your perceived "sin" that knowledgable Catholics disagree with interpretation of certain areas of catechesis as being the moral equivalent of bishops tolerating serial child rape by their priests over most if not all of the 20th century and on into today. If that is the case, you are thinking and reasoning much more like bishop than a parent.

Snowdrop, what liberals are

Snowdrop, what liberals are you talking about? John Paul II? Ratzinger? Bernard Law? Fr. Maciel?

. . . . and your point is???

. . . . and your point is???

Surely you jest when you

Surely you jest when you speak of an "all powerful liberal lobby"!

How do you find "post-modernism" and "philosophical realism" to be contraries? You seem to have a unique viewpoint on each of these.

The same can be said about your uses of "published catechical materials" linked to "Liberal-minded folks" - and - "common-sense-up-to-date and vital Catechetical...." For the life of me I find it hard to understand your intentions in these phrases.

"....Jesuit Father Federico

"....Jesuit Father Federico Lombardi, Vatican spokesman, issued a statement calling for greater objectivity in discussing "topics so dramatic" because the first concern of all should be "the safeguarding of children and of young people and the renewal of a climate of trust and collaboration" between church and state."
Fr. Lombardi, the Bishops, Cardinals and Vatican, the ones who should be at the Vanguard of safeguarding children and young people, are the very ones who have not done so. It is not their first concern. Self-protection of the Roman Catholic Church was foremost for them. Not only have they not protected them, they have often refused to hear their pleas, turned them away, protected priest pedophiles instead and transferred known criminals. They ought to be ashamed of themselves....There will be no climate of trust until they stop apologizing and admit their guilt, resign or be fired, open their files to the criminal justice system and if they're found guilty, serve their time. It's easy to say "I'm Sorry"....doesn't hurt at all, but it doesn't heal the deep wounds they have inflicted. Let's go back to what our Catechism said:

".....Mortal sin is a sin of grave matter
Mortal sin is committed with full knowledge of the sinner
Mortal sin is committed with deliberate consent of the sinner
This means that mortal sins cannot be done "accidentally." A person who commits a mortal sin is one who knows that their sin is wrong, but still deliberately commits the sin anyway. This means that mortal sins are "premeditated" by the sinner and thus are truly a rejection of God’s law and love.

The first condition, that a mortal sin is of grave matter, means that certain premeditated offenses against God are more severe than others." And Jesus told us what he has in store for those who harm children.

May I suggest that the

May I suggest that the Vatican alo recall about 50 U.S. bishops for starters and hold a training session on, "What can I do for a living, after I"m held accountable for all the damage I've done to the Catholic Church."

I'm afraid this is really

I'm afraid this is really what it's all about. What do you do for a pension, for a sense of who you are and how you will live out your life when you are 60 or 70 or 80? It will be painful to admit you have made grave mistakes. It is difficult to give up power to those that are younger than you but this is happening all the time in the business world; the 35-45 year old are making many decisions. This is painful to us 50+ folks but Jesus was just 33 when he died and his disciples probably the same; we seem to trust and rely on their teachings and judgements. So too must any bishop or cardinal or pope who ever looked the other way in favor of clergy over a child. The disciples took great risks giving up their families, goods and livelihoods to follow Jesus. They trusted God. So too must the current hierarchy trust that God will be with the younger clergy to discern God's plan for the Church. The old hierarchy can again become simple and humble servants in the parishes.

Alternatively, if there are priests, bishops and cardinals who feel that the Church has overstepped and want to pull away, we the laity must let them know that we will provide for them financially & emotionally if they decide that they can no longer support the Vatican.

Amen!

Amen!

If you want to learn about

If you want to learn about the true extent of the Vatican's failure to respond to the sexual abuse of children by priests read the book "Render Unto Rome" by Jason Berry. I am appalled at what I have learned.

Anonymous, i agree - i am

Anonymous, i agree - i am greatly saddened by what i read - what of Jesus Christ do these people believe?

I only wish that Catholics

I only wish that Catholics from the U.S. were as clear sighted and as brave as those of Ireland. I pray that the manipulations of the Vatican will not be tolerated.

Excessive? The usual

Excessive? The usual patronizing sneers from the monarchical Vatican to its serfs.

If people think they have

If people think they have been wronged criminally, then why not go directly to the Civil authorities? I think you know the answer; those authorities are still deferring to the Church. Now you know why China is fighting have bishops appointed solely by Rome. It creates the situation where a bishop owes his position to Rome.

"Recall" seems to be an

"Recall" seems to be an officious, dire and serious diplomatic term to say that the nuncio was going to Rome to attend a meeting to discuss a response to the report. Could the nuncio not simply have "flown to Rome for a meeting", or have read the report and forwarded a draft to Rome for review?

The courage of the Irish is

The courage of the Irish is outstanding; the courage of the PM overwhelming. Ah! how the Holy Spirit broods over the Irish. We may now want to pray to Catherine of Siena to beg her assistance in papal reform. I'm sure she's blessed the PM.

One of the crucial questions

One of the crucial questions in all of this is whether the Vatican was telling the Bishops to keep quiet. The actual phrasing of the pertinent sentence in the Nuncio's letter to the Irish Bishops, is being debated.

Its not as if the Vatican is going to put it in black and white, is it?

But a huge non-verbal communication, inviting all Cardinals and Bishops to remain silent has been out there for years - the continuing protection afforded to Cardinal Bernard Law! 'Your silence will be rewarded, gents!' is the clear message.

I think that it's hard for

I think that it's hard for most of us to understand how the catholic church functions historically. The Vatican thinks it has been extremely forthcoming and honest in its dealing with the abuse of children by priests. The usual response of the church is " we'll get back to you in a hundred years". The Vatican will also hem and haw about any complicated problem that the press brings to its attention. It will gradually over time make more and more simple statements about the matter, but nothing radical or pertinent. As times goes by, the issue fades from the public discourse, and the church is let off the hook. This is the way the catholic church has dealt with abuses of power in its past, and this is exactly what it's doing right now. It's true that they think in terms of hundreds of years. The institution is not designed to respond quickly or clearly to its critics. The Vatican feels it will be around for another 2000 years, so why worry?

Or did Prime Minister Kenny

Or did Prime Minister Kenny just cynically jump on a band wagon. That's not to defend child abuse, something Irish Governments have also been willing partners in during the past. Its not to defend Bishops and priests who have let the Church down. There is still a Christian Faith to be upheld and it felt to me that Mr Kenny was not unhappy to attack the good along with the bad.

Bravo to Enda Kenny for

Bravo to Enda Kenny for standing up to the self proclaimed "Holy See." The "Holy See" refuses to see. The "Holy See" only sees itself as the victim.

The "Holy See" is trying to rescue its lost authority, when the "Holy See" has squandered its credibility. The "Holy See" is afraid to admit the truth. The "Holy See" is still doing and saying things in public while doing and saying different things in secret.

The "Holy See" wants everyone to believe that this worldwide cover up of scandals in every diocese across the globe occurred randomly and accidentally without any knowledge of Rome. The "Holy See" doesn't want to admit that every bishop is mandated by the Vatican to keep secret all scandals because then Rome would have to accept responsibility for enabling the abuse of children.

The "Holy See" is not holy because it fears the truth. The secrecy of the hierarchy has been exposed. Their lies have been exposed. The fact that the "Holy See" doesn't get it exposes a pope who is out of touch with the real world. The "Holy See" cannot see because Pope Benedict cannot see.

The papal nuncio going back to Rome will not change the fact that the
"Holy See" is both blind and unholy!

Is this PM Catholic? He wants

Is this PM Catholic? He wants to introduce legislation to imprison priests who refuse to break the seal of the confessional. If he is Catholic then he should be excommunicated as soon as that legislation is introduced. Any Catholic MP who votes for it should be excommunicated as well.

So Paulte, I bet they

So Paulte, I bet they reintroduce general confessions.

Post new comment

NCR Comment code:

  1. Be respectful. Do not attack the writer. Take on the idea, not the messenger.
  2. Use appropriate language. Avoid vulgarities and slurs.
  3. Keep to the point. Deliberate digressions don't aid the discussion.

For more detailed guidelines, visit our User Guidelines page.

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
(if you have one; if not, leave this blank)
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <font> <swf> <swf list>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You may use <swf file="song.mp3"> to display Flash files inline

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This is to prove you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.