Healing the wounds

There are three simple words that have the power to heal wounds. We teach them to our children. We share them with the ones we have hurt. We say: “I am sorry.”

In the last year church officials have said “I am sorry” a number of times and in various ways; more apologies for current wrongs than I have ever heard in one year from an institution that has traditionally prided itself on certitude and even infallibility. The words “I am sorry” may have the power to reconcile, but they are meaningless without a corresponding conversion of heart. While I welcome the recent apologies, I worry they are just covering the wounds. The real change in behavior has yet to come.

In July 2008, Pope Benedict XVI apologized to survivors of clergy sexual abuse in Australia saying, “I am deeply sorry for the pain and suffering the victims have endured and I assure them that as their pastor I too share in their suffering.”

Last month, Archbishop Raymond Burke, the former St. Louis archbishop who now oversees the Vatican’s Apostolic Signatura, made an apology after a video was released showing him condemning his fellow bishops for not denying certain politicians communion. Burke issued a statement saying, “I am deeply sorry for the confusion and hurt which the wrong use of the videotape has caused to anyone, particularly, to my brother bishops.”

Another Vatican official, Archbishop Rino Fisichella, president of the Pontifical Academy for Life, criticized the “hasty” excommunication of a 9 year-old girl’s mother who helped her get an abortion to save her life. Fisichella is quoted as saying, “Before thinking about excommunication, it was necessary and urgent to protect her innocent life. … Unfortunately, this is not what happened.”

Pope John Paul II was known for his series of apologies for historical wrongs but admission of current mistakes by church officials is rare. One wonders what has prompted these and other recent apologies? I venture to say it has to do less with contrition of heart and more with playing defense.

There are two meanings for the word “apology.” The word traced to its Greek root, apologia, refers to a verbal or written defense; a refutation of charges. The term “apologetics” is associated for many Christians with the field of theology in which one defends the faith.

However, over time there grew a second meaning attached to the word “apology.” Our modern understanding of “apology” is that of an expression of sorrow or contrition over an admitted wrong.

NCR: February 3-16, 2012

Subscribe to NCR to get all the news and special features that aren't always available online. In this issue:

- US News: Bishops Host Conference on Immigration
Conference fields advocates' questions on law, policy

- Special Section: Deacons. Serving as parish administrator; roles of wives; and more

- Study: Black Catholics are more engaged
New study by Notre Dame researcher about parish involvement in America

Subscribe now!

Every recent apology from a church official has come from a position of defense: Benedict did not apologize for the sexual abuse crisis until six years after the massive revelations when he was faced with media scrutiny and upset laity on his trips abroad. Archbishop Burke did not apologize until the videotape was released at a press conference. Fisichella did not make his contrite comments until the excommunication story made global headlines and caused outrage among Catholics.

Many church officials have expressed their apologies and regrets but I see little contrition on their part; little has been done to rectify the underlying problems that necessitated the apologies in the first place.

Pope John Paul II, in his exhortation on “Reconciliation and Penance,” wrote “… reconciliation itself will be complete and effective only to the extent that [people] reach -- in order to heal it --that original wound which is the root of all other wounds: namely sin.”

I am waiting for the bishops to create true reconciliation by following their verbal apologies with behavior that would correct the wrongs done; that would not just cover, but truly heal the wounds.

Happy Easter! Christ is

Happy Easter! Christ is Risen! Alleluia! Alleluia! - That dear friends is probably the only uplifting comment you will read in these "Young Voices" pages. Definitely not "Easter" kind of "Young Voices". Mind you, from my reckoning, all of the NCR choices as "straw" representatives of "Young Voices" tend to regurgitate the very doctrinaire points of view of the cheerless "Sponsors" that recommended them to NCR...

When will this author be

When will this author be ready to apologize for her promotion of women's ordination, gay marriage, birth control, and her associations with anti-Catholic groups like Call to Action, and dignity. Her voice here is one that unfortunately is followed by some, will she apologize to them for leading them away from Christ and his church? She's great at questioning what's in the hearts of others when they apologize, but can she even see her own sins for what they are?

For those of us who live in

For those of us who live in 2009, opposing womens ordination is anti-Catholic. Opposing gay marriage is anti-Catholic. Wake up and smell the coffee. When you die you're going to have to answer to God for your promotion of injustice, not some power hungry, prideful bishop.

How soon until opposing

How soon until opposing polygamy or pederasty is anti-Catholic?

The public's approval of sin doesn't make it STOP being sin. The Scriptures cannot be broken. Or have you not read them?

Now the works of the flesh are plain: fornication, impurity, licentiousness, idolatry, sorcery, enmity, strife, jealousy, anger, selfishness, dissension, party spirit, envy, drunkenness, carousing, and the like. I warn you, as I warned you before, that those who do such things shall not inherit the kingdom of God. (Gal 5:19-21)

Do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived; neither the immoral, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor sexual perverts, nor thieves, nor the greedy, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor robbers will inherit the kingdom of God. (1 Cor 6:9-10)

God gave them up in the lusts of their hearts to impurity, to the dishonoring of their bodies among themselves, because they exchanged the truth about God for a lie and worshiped and served the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed for ever! Amen.
For this reason God gave them up to dishonorable passions. Their women exchanged natural relations for unnatural, and the men likewise gave up natural relations with women and were consumed with passion for one another, men committing shameless acts with men and receiving in their own persons the due penalty for their error. And since they did not see fit to acknowledge God, God gave them up to a base mind and to improper conduct.
They were filled with all manner of wickedness, evil, covetousness, malice. Full of envy, murder, strife, deceit, malignity, they are gossips, slanderers, haters of God, insolent, haughty, boastful, inventors of evil, disobedient to parents, foolish, faithless, heartless, ruthless. Though they know God's decree that those who do such things deserve to die, they not only do them but approve those who practice them. (Rom 1:24-32)

Great article, Nicole. After

Great article, Nicole. After reading about the boycott at Notre Dame by some of the the bishops and their statements regarding the practice of Reiki, they have lost credibility with me until they apologize for that as well.

These young people are doing

These young people are doing exactly what Jesus did: challenging the authority of a lifeless, unthinking, monolithic and highly politicized hierarchy whose time had passed. I commend them for their intelligence and their generous dedication to the people of God. Without these dedicated and courageous members of the younger generation, our church would die out with those who are currently corrupting it. Alleluia, Christ is risen yet again.

I am a "semi-old' voice, but

I am a "semi-old' voice, but I think Nicole Sotelo is totally right.

Just like the criticism of White House officials of being INSULATED from the real world, this is the only practical explanation that makes sense with these out-of-touch Vatican/hierarchical pronouncements.

The hierarchy need to go visit their brothers' and sisters', nieces', and nephews' homes and experience real life. They need to change diapers, clean some toilets, hand-wash dishes for a couple of weeks, take out garbage; plant and weed a garden, and go minister in nursing homes all night, for a couple of months.

They would change their tunes, after getting out of their SAFE, PROTECTED, ivory tower lives.

Yes, the apologies from the

Yes, the apologies from the leadership of the Catholic Church raise questions of their actual motivation - to recover public relations or to personally acknowledge regrets and contrition which then can lead to change in behaviors. The leadership appears to prefer "confrontation" as the foundation of their approach to problems. In their "nakedness" of doing so, the bishops reveal their limitations of guiding the People of God.

Yes, Nicole. From a lay

Yes, Nicole.

From a lay Dominican graduate seminarian---per Aquinas, "seldom affirm, never deny, always distinguish." If there is no credible evidence of self-giving loving (or in the case of the hierarchy, footwashing---which evidences humbly giving self as the Christ did), the Spirit is not as actively present as She (gender as historically characterized in Scripture) should be in the activity of the Church (regardless of whom is being examined)... ALL of the Church is wounded by our original wound (sin), and ALL of us should own it and work with it (none of us is holier than another because ALL of us are equally graced---mindless worship of the hierarchy can be idolatrous); and talk is cheap, actions provide the close reading of the human text!

Not to mention that the hierarchy certainly has NOT modelled the collaboration of Paul's kin-dom, either within the college of bishops or with the entire Body of Christ... unfortunately they appear to model power over, not power with, which is how the Christ ministered...

yes, mirrors hurt and often they lead to true conversion...

Nicole does not believe that

Nicole does not believe that these apologies are heart-felt? Such arrogance! How can she know? Pope Benedict XVI also pologized to victims in the United States (how quickly we forget that!) and scheduled a meeting with victim representatives during his pastoral visit last year. He apologized then because he was here -- his apology could be given directly to the victims and to the local Church so damaged and hurt by the acts of a few sick priests.

The US bishops have instituted policies in every diocese to screen out potential abusers. At least they are trying! It is totally impossible to screen out every potential abuser, after all we cannot read minds (though, clearly, some people expect that of the Church and her leaders). What the bishops have not done is to open the door to every possible lawsuit imaginable.

The reality is that the bishops have offered help when they can and are able, but they also have the responsibility of insuring that their dioceses can still function, that schools can remain open, parish churches still operate, the poor and needy can still be helped, seminarians still be educated. The truth is that for every penny the Church has spent on legal defense and in payouts to lawyers and victims, that means one less penny the Church can spend on students, parishes, soup kitchens, shelters, seminarians, young adults, elderly and infirm parishioners, etc. I applaud the bishops for saying that, despite the fact that we have an obligation to try to atone for the sins of our priests, we also have an obligation to see to the other ministries of the Church, ministries that benefit a far larger number of people than payouts do.

As for the rest, Nicole, like so many writers for NCR, seems to think that, if the Church does not bend to her will and create God in her image, then the Church and its leaders are not being honest, they are not genuinely interested in forgiveness. The truth is that the Church has been teaching and preaching the message of Christ for 2000 years. The Church has been safeguarding that message, a message that does not change, though its method of delivery may. Women have never been ordained priests. Gay marriage has never been permitted. Abortion has always been condemned as a moral evil, and on and on. When will writers like Nicole apologize for their arrogance, for their lack of humility in accepting the wisdom of God's Church? When will they apologize for the nails that they drive into the hands of Jesus by their intentional efforts to rend His Body, the Church, asunder?

I'm not holding my breath.

"The marvel of all history is

"The marvel of all history is the patience with which men and women submit to burdens unnecessarily laid upon them by their churches."

Slightly modified comment attributed to William H. Borah

Post new comment

NCR Comment code:

  1. Be respectful. Do not attack the writer. Take on the idea, not the messenger.
  2. Use appropriate language. Avoid vulgarities and slurs.
  3. Keep to the point. Deliberate digressions don't aid the discussion.

For more detailed guidelines, visit our User Guidelines page.

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
(if you have one; if not, leave this blank)
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <font> <swf> <swf list>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You may use <swf file="song.mp3"> to display Flash files inline

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This is to prove you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.