Here's the basic problem with war: It's planned by politicians and fought by the rest of a country. At this point, over 90 percent of the victims of war, the United Nations reports and researchers confirm, are not soldiers. They are civilians -- and most of them women and children.
From Where I Stand
As a citizen of this country, I am concerned about the way the
government has treated the Constitution and the Congress.
As a Christian, I am equally concerned about the way this country has
conducted the war against Iraq, now euphemistically called "The Global
War Against Terror."
We are a country held hostage by fear.
It’s difficult to go through an airport these days -- and I go through
lots of them here and around the world -- without doing some serious
soul-searching about it. The famous question repeats itself over and over
again in the tiniest of ways in me: Are we better off today than we were
five years ago?
While Sunnis were fighting Shi'as and Arab
Palestinians were fighting Jewish Israelis and U.S. Christians were
fighting Iraqi Muslims, I was sitting in a Buddhist monastery on the top
of a mountain in Taiwan. From the mountain top, the city in the distant
valley below was barely a memory, a phantom of another kind of life. Noise
and tumult, smoke and car horns had yet to touch this place.
Sounds idyllic, doesn't it? Shades of Shangri-la. A refuge. A hiding
place from life. A moment out of time.
Here, on the top of this mountain, I heard something that made me
think. "Nowadays," I heard a young woman say, "People take on religion
just to hurt one another."
Who are we fooling -- except maybe
The national myth is that we hold a common moral ethic, free of
cooptation by any particular religious group and devoted to religious
equality. Materialistic, secular USA, that blind behemoth of national
equality, child of the Enlightenment and beacon of freedom to all,
promises the world to leave faith to the faithful and legislate justice
About eight weeks ago, I dedicated this column to the meeting of Iraqi-American women in New York City. (Iraqi
ttwomen: Confused, maybe, but clear nevertheless) The problem with articles like that, of course, is that though they give us a filter through which we can view, interpret, and evaluate the hard news that plays on the front pages of our newspapers or on our newscasts, we are seldom able to follow up on either the people involved or the events to which they referred.
I read one Memorial Day speech after another this weekend, from one end
ttof this country to the next. Every one of them was incomplete. One question
ttwent unanswered, in fact, unasked, in all of them: What are we supposed to do
ttwhen the numbers of war dead continues to climb? How does a person handle so
ttmuch death by cable television?
Two issues consumed me this week: one an interview, the other a
ttconference. They are distinct events but, I am convinced, very deeply
ttconnected, as well.
Theres something intergalactic about hearing world news --
ttU.S. news -- in another country. Last week, for instance, I listened to the
ttnews in Tokyo. In the space of 24 hours, I heard a series of dizzying
Heres a story we might need to worry about a bit. In 1918 during World War I, The New York Times reports, 79 Montanans were convicted of sedition for speaking out in ways deemed critical of the United States.