65 years with the atomic bomb: A gathering storm for hope

"Tonight's theme is the momentum from a gathering storm for hope which I believe will one day bear fruit in abolishing all nuclear weapons." That's how Bishop Gabino Zavala, President of Pax Christi USA, launched our two-day observance last weekend of the 65th anniversary of the U.S. atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

He went on and offered us his clear-eyed view. "April of 2009 represented a sea change from the former administration," he said, referring to Obama's speech in Prague. "It clearly laid out our president's vision and commitment to nuclear disarmament," toward "a nuclear free world."

But then Obama's glaring contradiction. The bishop took him to task for allocating more national treasure for nukes than his predecessor. In many documents over the past decades, the bishop reminded us, nuclear weapons have inspired official condemnation from the Catholic Church. And he urged us to take it seriously, to keep building our grassroots movement. Make your hopes for peace come true, he concluded.

Bishop Zavala's presence felt like a breath of fresh air to those of us in New Mexico who've been speaking out for disarmament for years. Not every day does one hear a Catholic bishop speaking clearly and eloquently about this crucial matter -- especially here, where nuclear weapons were first built and a new generation of them is in the works, thanks to Obama. Bishop Zavala's presence heightened our hope.

It was in that spirit of hope that we ascended the narrow road along the mountain cliff up to Los Alamos the next afternoon. We assembled ourselves at Ashley Pond, the park in the center of town where, 65 years ago, "Little Boy" and "Fat Man" were built -- carnival euphemisms to mask their impending horror.

There we passed out sackcloth and bags of ashes, then blessed them and the people of Los Alamos. In a spirit of prayer and repentance, more than a hundred of us then set off in silence along Trinity Road. At the appointed time we stopped and scattered the ashes and donned our sackcloth, and for 30 minutes we sat in prayer. We repented of our own role in the mortal sin of war and nuclear weapons, and we begged the God of peace to convert our nation to nonviolence and give us the gift of nuclear disarmament.

A weird sight to be sure. Over a dozen drivers that I saw revved by in a fit of aggression, hurling curses and insults and abuse. But processing back to the pond, friends shared how moved they were to take part in an action so imbued with the spirit of Jesus and Gandhi. And the tradition of the book of Jonah.

NCR: February 3-16, 2012

Subscribe to NCR to get all the news and special features that aren't always available online. In this issue:

- US News: Bishops Host Conference on Immigration
Conference fields advocates' questions on law, policy

- Special Section: Deacons. Serving as parish administrator; roles of wives; and more

- Study: Black Catholics are more engaged
New study by Notre Dame researcher about parish involvement in America

Subscribe now!

"Who are you trying to speak to?" an ABC TV reporter asked me just before we set off.

I said, of course, we call upon the employees and people of Los Alamos to stop designing, building and maintaining nuclear weapons. And we're speaking, as well, to the people of New Mexico, and perhaps to the world, about the need to abolish these weapons. But ultimately, I said, we're here to speak to God, to beg the God of peace for the gift of a world without war and nuclear weapons.

His eyes widened. I saw in them a fusion of wonder, amusement and surprise. "God?," he probably wanted to ask. "What does God have to do with this?" He had, I surmise, expected the usual -- a seething peace demonstration full of hysteria and anger. And here was one of penitence and sorrow, faith and hope. It was clear he was going to have some fresh thinking to do.

And all the more so because among us were representatives of the largest youth-led movement for disarmament in the country -- "Think Outside the Bomb." One doesn't often associate young people with anti-nuclear sentiments -- at least if you believe the media. But here was Jennifer, who happily told us, once we gathered back at Ashley Pond, of the group's upcoming week-long encampment and vigils in the town. They are planning a nonviolent direct action for later this week. These young folks, as the good bishop did, renewed our hope.

Miki Taylor was also among us, a doctor who grew up and spent her life in Hiroshima. She recently moved with her husband to Santa Fe, and she thanked us for our public stand. Later she told me that, while we need to remember Hiroshima and Nagasaki, we must understand that the same dark spirit which first created these weapons remains among us. The willingness to eliminate millions in a flash still lingers in the air. That evil spirit is alive and well in our military institutions, corporations, and government, and somehow, we need to change that spirit.

To our happy surprise, Ann Wright also joined us. A former army colonel and State Department official, she famously resigned in protest in 2003 in opposition to the Iraq War. Today she is one of the great leaders in the international peace movement, and travels tirelessly to promote peace and reconciliation. She was aboard one of the boats in the recent flotilla with relief supplies to Gaza when Israeli soldiers attacked, killing nine. Currently on a national speaking tour, she is also working to raise funds for a U.S. boat to Gaza.

Last year she made a pilgrimage to Hiroshima, where she tried to take in the destruction and open her heart to the pain. As for Los Alamos, the feeling is different, she said. "It feels eerie to be here." It was her first visit to the city of the Bomb.

In that eeriness -- spectacular vistas darkened by an evil purpose -- Ann encouraged us. "Continue your work for disarmament and peace," she said, "Don't give up. While the national movement seems dead, the local movements are strong. Everywhere, small grassroots groups are organizing and holding vigils and bringing in speakers. People are doing what they can. So keep doing what you can," she said with a smile, "Together, we can make a difference."

Sixty-five years ago our nation killed civilians on an incalculable scale. And in somber commemoration, a hundred of us this past weekend took to Trinity Road with heads bowed in sorrow. The weekend has passed, but not the opportunity. Accordingly, I invite everyone to join in that spirit of prayer, repentance, and nonviolence, and to do what you can to promote nuclear disarmament, as well as an end to our nation's senseless wars.

A word of caution, however -- don't do it with anger. Anger gains little; rulers shrug it off. Their constantly being embroiled in power struggles makes them adept at thwarting it. Grief is another matter altogether. Genuine grief can't be withstood. Rulers stand helpless before it. It leaves them flustered and confounded -- and in the best of scenarios, sets their own tears flowing too. It can be an opening to compassion and nonviolence.

And so I offer the following prayer, one used at previous vigils, to help us enter into grief, to help us convert our hearts, our church, and our nation. To help us cry out for God's gift of justice, disarmament and peace. As we "storm heaven" for the gift of peace, may it generate new hope among us.

God of peace, as we remember our sisters and brothers killed in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, we repent of the atomic bomb, of those horrific acts, of all the death and destruction that we have wrought.

As our country continues to design, build and maintain these genocidal weapons of mass destruction, we repent of our mortal sin.

As our country threatens the whole human race and the entire planet, we repent of our willingness to destroy the gift of your creation.

As we continue to hold the world hostage and commit the ultimate act of terrorism by threatening to use these nuclear weapons, we repent of nuclear terrorism and the fear, distrust and infidelity we spread.

For our silence, indifference, fear and despair, we repent. For all the violence we have personally committed, and for our own complicity with the culture of war and nuclear weapons, we repent.

Disarm our hearts, disarm our cities, disarm our military and our nation, disarm our world. Give us the gift of a world without war, poverty or nuclear weapons, a new world of peace.

And so we pledge--
In this world of hatred, indifference, fear and anxiety, to be instruments of your love;
In this world of selfishness, greed and materialism, to be instruments of your selfless service and generosity;
In this world of revenge, retaliation and resentment, to be instruments of your mercy, compassion and forgiveness;
In this world of doubt and despair, to be instruments of faith and hope;
In this world of lies and darkness, to be instruments of truth and light;
In this world of war, nuclear weapons and death, to be instruments of your peace, nonviolence and life.

Strengthen us to rebuild your global grassroots movement of nonviolence, that we will inspire more and more people to work for the abolition of war, poverty and nuclear weapons, that we might welcome your reign of nonviolence, love and peace everywhere. We ask this in the name of the nonviolent Jesus. Amen.

*****

John's column will return Sept. 7. His latest book, Daniel Berrigan: Essential Writings (Orbis), along with other recent books, A Persistent Peace and Put Down Your Sword, as well as Patricia Normile's John Dear On Peace, are available from www.amazon.com. To contribute to Catholic Relief Services' "Fr. John Dear Haiti Fund," go to: http://donate.crs.org/goto/fatherjohn. For further information, or to schedule a lecture or retreat on Gospel Nonviolence, go to www.johndear.org.

With all due respect to his

With all due respect to his Excellency, the Bishop is misinformed. Obama is NOT a change from Bush. In no way are they different in any meaningful way. Obama continues to push on the war in Afghanistan, shows no signs of coming out of Iraq, the president can now order the killing of basically anyone he decides is a threat to the nation for pretty much any reason, Bush's warrentless wiretaps have not been got rid of, etc. etc...

Obama is owned, lock, stock and barrel, just like Bush was (and is still).

I think the Bishop knows this, at least by the opening two paragraphs. First he states basically how Obama talked great about how everything would be different. Then his Excellency goes on to note how, basically, Obama has done nothing of the sort.

Obama has sold himself to the same interests that purchased his predecessor. To those of you who put such messianic 'hope' in him, a mere politician, I ask: how you could possibly be so naive in this day in age to put such trust in princes of this world?

Anger is the cause of all

Anger is the cause of all suffering. It is impossible to be angry without blame, and we do so, by way of explanation and in doing so uphold our egos.Jd uses the word storm albeit from a quote. Let us in the process of seeking Gods loving transformation of our anger, into love, through Gods love the intended, understand that the language of heroic imagery such as storm is a construction of egos anger. Let us understand that when ever a person becomes angry, it stops being about, anyone or anything else and becomes about the individuals point of view, their ego. So let not our efforts for peace, become about our individual egos, but rather for the peace of love we all seek. There is no peace in anger it is peace i seek. Fulfill the intended

While it’s popular to give

While it’s popular to give observances on the anniversary of the atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, no one seems to remember the firebombing of Tokyo on March 10th, 1945. Just as many people were killed from the fire we rained down on Tokyo that night as were killed in Hiroshima and Nagasaki from atomic bombing.

AGREE! We should never have

AGREE! We should never have opposed Japan. After the bombing of Pearl Harbor, we should have bowed low, turned the other cheek, and surrendered.

John Dear is right. We are evil.

we should never have

we should never have established an obviously highly provocative and deadly military base in Pearl Harbor aimed only at a nation with whom we were then at peace.

What Japan did would now be excused under present military standards as a surgical air strike taking out an obviously offensive target, hitting only those military targets and nothing else.

There can be no excuse for all that followed, particularly the incineration of these two cities after Japan was already suing of surrender, not to mention the forgotten firebombing of Tokyo and civilians sheltered there.

There is no excuse for war.
Thou shalt not kill.

Love thy enemy.

All we can do to find spiritual healing is to pray for forgiveness, and to repent,

to beat our swords into plowshares, as the Rev. Phillip Berrigan taught us, and gave example, courageously and consistently.

YES! Japan SHOULD have

YES! Japan SHOULD have bombed Pearl Harbor, and we SHOULD have surrendered most humbly to the Divine Emperor of Japan, Heir of the Sun Goddess!

As John Dear points out so eloquently, we are evil! Our fathers and grandfathers who fought at Okinawa, Guadalcanal, the Coral Sea, Bataan, Corregidor, Iwo Jima, etc., are paying for their crimes against the Divine Emperor in HELL!

http://library.thinkquest.org/18106/battles.html

let us pray for peace

let us pray for peace

Gosh, you guys are the clever

Gosh, you guys are the clever ones. OK, then. let's state the obvious. There's a difference (whether you want to admit it or not) between fighting aggression and unleashing all-out destruction on innocent civilians, as happened in Tokyo, Hiroshima, Nagasaki, Dresden, Hamburg, and , to a lesser extent, London. I suppose, if you're planning on a 20 year war, you'd want to kill off the next generation of soldiers while they're still helpless infants - but that seems a bit cynical - even for you.

I beg forgiveness not only of

I beg forgiveness not only of God but also of the Reverend Father John Dear SJ, who has my most profound respect and admiration and envy, as that Friday after a full week of work, now with forty 4years-olds who mostly cross the border and back each day for me nearly alone, these old bones crunched at the thought of several hours behind the wheel of the old pickup to get to Los Alamos, these bones which remember well the youngsters revving an Audi into our rear end last time we went. The bones remember, and revolt.

And so we instead caught the comfort of a smooth, sleepy Greyhound (actually an Omnibus of Mexico) to ride, to arise to rest within the war zone of Ciudad Juarez and there to pray in unity with you brave, prophetic walkers in Los Alamos for peace, and to work with you but in Juarez, for peace and for hope and nonviolence meeting those who suffer intense violence, physically, emotionally, financially, psychologically, spiritually, in Ciudad Juarez, yet who heroically give example of continuing in peace and joy and cooperation even under these extremes.

I beg Fr. John to know, and to accept, and to forgive therefore that I could not go anatomically to Los Alamos; these dry old bones were not in agreement, these dry old bones like those of the ancient prophet in the desert, waiting to be made Known, to arise and rejoice, these bones which had every desire to be with Fr. John and companions, kneeling along the road in Los Alamos, yet I knelt with you all in an old wooden pew in the cathedral of Ciudad Juarez, praying for peace, and along the Rio Bravo where Sergio Hernandez was shot, and among the blessed People of God, learning to pray and to work and to live in peace, with joy and with hope in the teeth of desperation.

sorry I could not make it, and I am very grateful to read this excerpt of the sermon of this great Roman Catholic Bishop, and all of Father John's works, which fall like blessed drops of living rains into this scorching, bitter and violent desert of war.

Goodness, what a load of self

Goodness, what a load of self pity. (Your old bones didn't keep you from planting your campaign signs in the church yard, hoping to give voters the impression that the church endorsed your candidacy.)

oh, real cool, now I have an

oh, real cool, now I have an internet stalker close to home!

stop by sometime for a prayer and some mango!

You consider someone who

You consider someone who reads your posts a "stalker"?

Does that mean you're a stalker of McBrien, Dear, et al.?

well, heck, I certainly don't

well, heck, I certainly don't keep tales of what might or might not have happened OUTSIDE of a church yard years ago in a tiny village where there is not much, outside of the church yard . . .

come to think of it, someone far away could have googled obscure and village blogs from years ago, sure, but yet, and still, kinda creepy, dude . . .

Palmonas, I like your posts

Palmonas, I like your posts and always look forward to reading them, but sometimes a confession has a bit too much vanity. I think the above is one of those times. Yet, please continue to post, as you often educate me and help me on my own journey. Peace and prayers.

just a private prayer, or as

just a private prayer, or as you correctly call it, confession, to Father John.

Sorry you had to suffer through reading it. I had no other way.

It's OK, but is palomas and

It's OK, but is palomas and Charles Scanlon the same? Either way, I do often enjoy your posts.

I think that "Frère Charles

I think that "Frère Charles du Désert OSB OBLAT (Congrégation de Subiaco)" has returned as "Palomas."

no way . . .

no way . . .

AH my, Palomas and anonymous

AH my, Palomas and anonymous we need a non violent movement to end he war between them. And both have a great deal of contrition to do in the process. Enough already.

As for Hiroshima and Nagasaki - they are symbols of the height to which we will go to destroy ourselves and each other. Actually more civilians were killed in the fire bombing ot Dresden and of Tokyo that at both Nagasaki or Hiroshima. The point is this - nuclear weapons continue to proliferate, they represent the worse of what we can do, not the best of what we can do and tha is why a place like Los Alamos is important. It is after all where Oppenheimer worked - the same man who at Trinity ( what a horrible parody on our Lord) stated that “Today I am become death, the destroyer of world.” And later even Oppenheimer and many of those who worked on the first bombs turned away from what they did.

Man , in his pride may have become death but Christ is life the creator of world so we do need to face what we have done.

I agree with Matt to a point - Pride is the first step to all sin and pride - the belief that we have become God is our death.

That is why we all need to stop trying to prove our point in our pride. I respect that Fr. John marched in silence and repentance. Its a sacrament we need to return to in all areas of our lives.

You're the one who has "a

You're the one who has "a great deal of contrition to do".

(Is contrition something that is done, or something that is felt?)

We each have much reparation

We each have much reparation to do.

For precision in this discourse, read Jonah in Nineveh, once he finally got there. See for instance the Anchor Bible commentary on this book.

Read as well the powerful meditations on the old testament prophets from the Reverend Father Daniel Berrigan SJ to learn what it is to be contrite, to do an act of contrition.

This we each must do, first to know our sin and then to repent and to repair.

To rebuild and to beg forgiveness.

To Love our enemy. To love the ones we do not love. To love the ones who cannot love us by being love, by begging forgiveness, by building the bridges, by fulfilling real needs.

Let us love, contritely, repentantly, with all self-sacrifice and humility, never expecting but ever hoping for love, and for mercy, in return for our overwhelming investment.

We would do well to recall

We would do well to recall the Catholic congregation attending mass at the great Cathedral the moment that bomb exploded over the city of Nagasaki..it
would seem at that instant they all became martyrs for their faith as their
bodies were totally incinerated! In spite of all that the Bishop commemorates here today the world is still making the same mistakes..only now it is Iran and NOrth Korea. Will the good Bishop and all the peaceniks here speak to their
planned atrocities that have yet to happen?agaist Israel? It is safe to go
after our dead war heroes of past wars and blame them in retrospect but if peace for the world is really the intention here why do we hear only silence about those countries that today would wreak even greater nuclear havoc on the present world.. where are the Bishop(s) and the peaceniks on this current front? I hear nothing of significance from them. Only the past "sins" of the United States seem worthy of their ire!

I hear the Reverend Father

I hear the Reverend Father John Dear SJ calling for the closure of the wasteful, costly, immoral, evil, new plutonium plant in Los Alamos.

Hear him.

"we should never have

"we should never have established an obviously highly provocative and deadly military base in Pearl Harbor aimed only at a nation with whom we were then at peace.

What Japan did would now be excused under present military standards as a surgical air strike taking out an obviously offensive target, hitting only those military targets and nothing else."

No,that is not what Japan did. Too much self hatred is not good. The same day the Japanese attacked Peal Harbor,

-They invaded the Phillipines and subjugated the Philipino people. 100,000 Filipino hostages were murdered in Manila.
-They invaded Malaysia and Singapore and murdered thousands of Chinese "sub humans" after British forces surrendered
-Continued to advance deeper into China operating under the "Burn all, Kill All, Loot all" orders. Millions of Chinese "sub humans" died under Japanese occupation
-Invaded Burma. To their credit, Japanese treatd non tribal Burmese relatively well. But they encouraged the Burmese to slaughter Chinese immigrants
-Occupied the Pacific Islands. The Japanese quickly deemed the indigenous people to be "forest monkeys" and exploitable.

The Japanese operated on much the same "master race" and "superior nation" principles that the Germans did. They just used "Son of Heaven" instead of "Aryan".

and what do we operate on, in

and what do we operate on, in our present imperial wars?

Historians note that if Japan had also bombed the extensive fuel tanks on shore, they would have delayed any US operations for months.

Instead they disabled only the provocative military targets, the battleships pointed only at Japan, with whom we were at peace, which were set up there in order for Roosevelt to gain the politically acceptable excuse to go to war, which America did not want.

We did not use such discrimination nor proportionality when we incinerated Hiroshima this day in 1945.

peace.

Good post. Unfortunately,

Good post. Unfortunately, those who prefer Dear's revisionist history are not interested in facts.

I'm interested. Where are the

I'm interested. Where are the facts?

busy day, Tex. And what did

busy day, Tex.

And what did we do to the indigenous people of Bikini Island? How did our boys treat the people of Vietnam? What do we now with our superior firepower call the people of Iraq, who never invaded us in any way - rag monkeys?

I'm amused. You will forgive

I'm amused.
You will forgive me for not wallowing in all of the above emotions.

My father was drafted in 1942 and landed Christmas Eve during the battle of Cassablanca, fought in North Africa, landed at Omaha beach, fought in the battle of the bulge, fought his way into Berlin only to be readied to be shipped to fight in Japan. The odds are he would have been killed and I wouldn't exist. Those are the facts.

Tell me, how many of you protestors at los Alamos visited Manchuria where the Japanese raped and murdered over 1 million civilians, Indonesia, and other atrocities committed by those so very civilized Japanes. How about visiting Korean women held as prostitutes for the Japanese military, how about shedding light on those so called poor civilians killed by the atomic bombings who were preparing for war by making weapons out of household items to kill those American invadors?
Nope, your hypocricy is palpable.
As far as Palomas aka Frere Charles, he critizes Americans but overlooks the murders, killings, mass graves and hangings from bridges in his beloved Mexico. Remove that beam from your eye first, Frere.

Those who are

Those who are clueless/dishonest about what an invasion of the home islands would have meant should do some reading.

Paul Fussell's "Thank God for the Atom Bomb" is a good place to start.

http://www.amazon.com/Thank-Atom-Bomb-Paul-Fussell/dp/0345361350/ref=sr_...

http://www.google.com/#hl=en&source=hp&q=arming+civilians+for+invasion+o...

And exterminating Japanese

And exterminating Japanese civilians was proper punishment for the crimes of the Japanese military? By that logic, perhaps you and i should have both been shot to make up for Mi Lai.

Baloney. Japanese civilians

Baloney.
Japanese civilians were at the heart of the Japanese war machine.
They were preparing for the invasion making weapons out of household items.
The Japanese government were first warned before the first bombing and did nothing, then after Hiroshima they were warned again and did nothing for 3 days. Nagasaki was bombed and they were prepared to not surrender until the emperor stepped in.

Oh please! Yeah those old

Oh please! Yeah those old women and 9-yr-olds were just layin' for us. I only wonder why we waited 3 days for the 2nd bomb. They were dropped on japan, but they were intended for the Soviet Union.

Yeah, just old women and 9

Yeah, just old women and 9 year olds in Hiroshima. Funny, no condemnation of the rape on Nanking where about 1 million died at the hands of the Japanese.
Your grasping for straws.
The old Soviet Union theory, yeah more straws.

500,000 thousand American lives would have been lost when using the casuality percentages from Okinawa along with about 1.5 million dead Japanese if an invasion occured.

If one of YOUR relatives was drafted in the military you wouldn't be so quick to sacrifice him/her in a war that was started by the Japanese. And those innocent civilians were preparing for the invasion by making weapons I might add.
BTW, my dad was drafted as well as 4 uncles. One uncle died and was the first from my state to die. One other suffered shell shock, missing in action on an island off the Philippines.

Until YOU know first hand what that does to innocent American families, drafted to fight a war they didn't start then you don't know what you're talking about. Whatever it took to end that war was justified.
They got what they deserved.

they got what they

they got what they deserved?
and into which church did you get yourself baptized, doc?

read The Challenge of Peace in its points of proportionality and discrimination, at least.

Read the continuous papal condemnations of nuclear weapons, and why.

you earler here write:
"Japanese civilians were at the heart of the Japanese war machine.
They were preparing for the invasion making weapons out of household items."

What, chopsticks?
that's about all there was left, with little left to use them to eat.

you claim to have a doctorate.
use your research skills

The Japanese peole were pleadng to surrender, but Truman wanted to spook Stalin by proving what a big bad boy he was.

nothing to do with the already defeated Japanese.

You don't even know what

You don't even know what you're talking about.
But keep posting, the more you do the more you make you look foolish.

BTW, I'm a physician and I've treated some patients who have LIVED through the atrocities of the Japanese and Nazi's. Some of these are not pretty.
To eliminate EVIL we did what we needed to do.

Again,
They got what they deserved.

Jesus was correct, those who live by the sword perish by the sword.

The Nazi's and Imperial Japanese lived by the sword, murdering tens of millions and they perished by the sword.

Well, we didn't actually

Well, we didn't actually eliminate evil. It clearly is still with us and never fully left. I agree with your position of the horrors of the Nazis and the Japanese during the war, but I'am taken aback by your remark "they got what they deserve"? It may empower you in your righteousness, but is this the way we respond to Jesus's directive to pray for our enemies, to to good to those who persecute us? What does that mean to you and how many of us have prayed for these enemies?

Ok, how would you have ended

Ok, how would you have ended the war?
Invaded Japan? Kill 500000 American soldiers and 1.5 million Japanese?
I'm empowered by truth. So tell me how you would do it before you accuse me of self righteousness.
You complain without providing answers.

by admitting that as much as

by admitting that as much as truman and generals did not want it to, to was over, and accept Japan's plea to surrender before throwing the evil of the bombs, and the immoral firebombing of Tokyo

no invasion needed, simply admit victory, whatever that means, and sign on the dotted line and go home.

self-righteously

to peace.
whatever that means . . .

Dr Dale, the issue I raised

Dr Dale, the issue I raised was about how one holds onto gospel directives of loving ones neighbor;ones enemy and remains comfortable with statements such as "they got what they deserved". How I would have ended the war is a different discussion.

And I might add John

And I might add John David:
Historian Richard B.Frank, who is writing a three-volume history of the Pacific war, based on recent declassified Soviet documents along with American and Japanese documents, said that ultimate responsibility for what happened lay with Japan's government and Hirohito, who had decided in June to draft almost the entire population, men and most women, to fight to the death.
Frank has argued that as terrible as the atomic bombs were, they saved hundreds of thousands of American soldiers and millions of Japanese troops and civilians who would have perished if the conflict had gone on until 1946.

polemicist, not historian,

polemicist, not historian, but revisionist . . .
better book sales that way . . .

Actually, charles, you're

Actually, charles, you're wrong on one point.

The main reason the nukes were dropped was not to 'spook' Stalin, although I'm sure Truman would have enjoyed that had Stalin not already known basically everything already (they're spy network was already vast an effective).

The main reason was to force Japan into UNCONDITIONAL surrender. You are correct that they had feelers out to have peace, but peace with conditions was NOT on Truman's mind.

Once the goal of unconditional surrender was set, there was nothing left to do but either invade and butcher until the ground choked on the gore, or start nuking city after city.

I was demanding unconditional surrender that caused to the mass nuke killing.

Actually, it wasn't

Actually, it wasn't unconditional.
We wanted the emperor removed and tried. The Japanese wanted the emperor to remain and refused to have him tried for war crimes and crimes against humanity.
We decided that to end the war we would capitulate and compromise. Otherwise, we would have either had to invade or continue using atomic weapons against them.
He's actually wrong on most points. The American death/casualty rate continued to be the same and was just as lethal to American soldiers up to the atomic bombings. The Kamakazi kill rate was 1.8/1.0, 1.8 Americans killed to 1 suicide Japanese killed. Most forget to include naval death rates, the Indianapolis sinking, as an example.

source this doc realiably and

source this doc realiably and validly
and read
Atomic Tragedy: Henry L. Stimson and the Decision to Use the Bomb Against Japan by Sean L. Malloy

The odds are he would not

The odds are he would not have been killed as Japan was already defeated and none were left to kill him.

If you are betting the odds.

In a half hour I am heading for Ciudad Juarez to relax and go to Church. I will revisit your question there and let you know, doc.

Hey, lots of ill there need your services, even if you do only eyes, doctor.

Frere states: "Japan was

Frere states: "Japan was already defeated and none were left to kill him."
You definitely need a history lesson frere. You're in the Tequila again.

well, okay, so let's start

well, okay, so let's start the history lesson with

Hiroshima by John Hersey

or something you might grasp, as even I did

Barefoot Gen, Vol. 1: A Cartoon Story of Hiroshima by Keiji Nakazawa, Art Spiegelman, and Project Gen

or

Hibakusha: Survivors of Hiroshima and Nagasaki by Gaynor Sekimori, Naomi Shohno, and George Marshall

or perhaps best in this present context
Hiroshima: Why America Dropped the Atomic Bomb by Ronald Takaki

read this product description from amazon.com
=============================================================================
From Publishers Weekly
Ethnic studies professor Takaki argues that racism and a desire to intimidate the Soviet Union were important factors in the decision to use the atomic bomb on Japan.
Copyright 1996 Reed Business Information, Inc.
Product Description
The bombing of Hiroshima was one of the pivotal events of the twentieth century, yet this controversial question remains unresolved. At the time, General Dwight Eisenhower, General Douglas MacArthur, and chief of staff Admiral William Leahy all agreed that an atomic attack on Japanese cities was unnecessary. All of them believed that Japan had already been beaten and that the war would soon end. Was the bomb dropped to end the war more quickly? Or did it herald the start of the Cold War? In his probing new study, prizewinning historian Ronald Takaki explores these factors and more. He considers the cultural context of race - the ways in which stereotypes of the Japanese influenced public opinion and policymakers - and also probes the human dimension. Relying on top secret military reports, diaries, and personal letters, Takaki relates international policies to the individuals involved: Los Alamos director J. Robert Oppenheimer, Secretary of State James Byrnes, Secretary of War Henry L. Stimson, and others... but above all, Harry Truman.

====================================================================

You say, doc, that I am in the tequila again?

funny story about that . . .

years and years ago when I came to this region, I used to sit at a place in Mexico, order mineral water with lime and read commentaries on James Joyce, or on Jesus Christ.

Because, you know, I was not a drinker.

Well, one day I was really curious to see what all of the excitement was all about, and thought I would ask the guy to bring me a shot of tequila.

The barmaid came by before I had a chance to sip at it tentatively, or even sniff at it cautiously, and she knocked it over and hollered long and loud at me.

Never gone near any kind of alcohol again, except for when receiving Holy Communion under both species unavoidably.

so
funny story there
tequila?
barmaid wouldn't let me.
and we still we pray for one another's intentions.
especially now in the feast of San Lorenzo

go figure

Hmm.... Articles

Hmm....
Articles by

Nakazawa,

Sekimori,

Shohno,

Takaki,

Sorry but these authors, all Japanese, aren't expected to give a balanced view anymore that reading about Catholicism by Protestants or Mexican history written by the Spaniards.

Why not on the feast pray for those soldiers who fought and died to save us from Nazism and Japanese Imperialism that sought to enslave and thatkilled TENS of Millions. And pray for my dead relatives who were killed by them.

I'll close by saying you won't. Because you dress yourself up in self righteousness, develop a bleeding heart and defend the Japanese, etc. But, you do this to alleviate your guilt over your own bigotry, your anti American bigotry.
I pray for your deliverance from your own self deception.

read them as their

read them as their perspective is far more accurate than what you have been force fed.

They are academic and objective in their research and presentation.
Even Barefoot Gen.
Read it and find healing from your deep wounds and scars, and find peace at last with your demons.

Wait, and Hershey, too?

How about:
Original child bomb: Points for meditation to be scratched on the walls of a cave (A New Directions paperbook) by Thomas Merton

Peace In The Post-christian Era by Thomas Merton

Thomas Merton on Nuclear Weapons by Ronald E. Powaski

Cold War Letters by Thomas Merton

The Nonviolent Alternative by Thomas Merton and Gordon C. Zahn

Christian morality and nuclear war by Thomas Merton

Suffering Made Real: American Science and the Survivors at Hiroshima by M. Susan Lindee

and try this for starters as you trust no other sources according to the race of the recorders:

Atomic Tragedy: Henry L. Stimson and the Decision to Use the Bomb Against Japan by Sean L. Malloy

Read the new SCHOLARLY text

Read the new SCHOLARLY text about the invasion of Japan by the Russian army AFTER the bombs were dropped (reported by the AP this weekend)
BASED ON RECENT DECLASSIFIED SOVIET, JAPANESE AND AMERICAN DOCUMENTS.

I immediately thought of you because it completely shreds all of your arguments.

From by Tsuyoshi Hasegawa, whose recently published "Racing the Enemy" examines the conclusion of the Pacific war and is based on recently declassified Soviet archives as well as U.S. and Japanese documents by a professor at University of California, Santa Barbara.

.....Operation August Storm was launched Aug. 9, 1945, as the Nagasaki bomb was dropped, and would claim the lives of 84,000 Japanese and 12,000 Soviet soldiers in two weeks of fighting. The Soviets ended up just 50 kilometers (30 miles) from Japan's main northern island, Hokkaido. Tsuyoshi Hasegawa, whose recently published "Racing the Enemy" examines the conclusion of the Pacific war and is based on recently declassified Soviet archives as well as U.S. and Japanese documents.

"The emperor and the peace party (within the government) hastened to end the war expecting that the Americans would deal with Japan more generously than the Soviets," Hasegawa, a Russian-speaking American SCHOLAR, said in an interview.

Despite the death toll from the atomic bombings — 140,000 in Hiroshima, 80,000 in Nagasaki the Imperial Military Command believed it could hold out against an Allied invasion if it retained control of Manchuria and Korea, which provided Japan with the resources for war, according to Hasegawa and Terry Charman, a historian of World War II at London's Imperial War Museum.

Secretary of War Henry Stimson, (the bombs) were the 'least abhorrent choice' of a dreadful array of option facing American leaders," he said in an interview. "Alternatives to the atomic bombs carried no guarantee as to when they would end the war and carried a far higher price in human death and suffering."

MOST IMPORTANTLY:

*****Frank, who is writing a three-volume history of the Pacific war, said that ultimate responsibility for what happened lay with Japan's government and Hirohito, who had decided in June to draft almost the entire population, men and most women, to fight to the death.
Historian Richard B. Frank has argued that as terrible as the atomic bombs were, they saved hundreds of thousands of American soldiers and millions of Japanese troops and civilians who would have perished if the conflict had gone on until 1946.
"Since no provision had been made to place these people in uniform, invading Allied troops would have not been able to distinguish combatants from noncombatants, effectively turning each village in Japan into a military target," Frank said.

So Frere, continue to read your little paper pamphlets all you want and bathe yourself in ignorance. I doubt if Soviet, American and Japanese declassified documents will create a dent in your preconceived anti-American bigotry.

BTW, still waiting for your condemnation of Japanese Imperialism.

I do not intend to waste my time to respond further to someone as contemptuous as yourself.

wait a minute, I grow

wait a minute, I grow confused, Doc, and help me in my confusion.

You earlier wrote this:

"Hmm....
Articles by

Nakazawa,

Sekimori,

Shohno,

Takaki,

Sorry but these authors, all Japanese, aren't expected to give a balanced view anymore that reading about Catholicism by Protestants or Mexican history written by the Spaniards."

yet now push this work (with which I am familiar) by Tsuyoshi Hasegawa?

Incidentally you strongly and seriously misrepresent the careful academic work and conclusions of Professor Tsuyoshi Hasegawa, using unsourced quotes from "an interview" and disconnected paragraphs with your own polemics.

BTW, still waiting for your Credo, your profession and declaration of Catholic belief, including the rejection of Satan and all of his works, including the atom bomb, consistently condemned as evil and inherently immoral by our hierarchy, both the USCCB and our papacy.

please see the comments under

please see the comments under this article by Josh here

http://ncronline.org/news/peace/hiroshima-day-marked-kansas-city-activis...

especially the one entitled 5) General Dwight Eisenhower
and of the Maryknoll Father at My father,a combat engineer

odds are your father would have observed the same, and repented

Repented for what? If these

Repented for what?
If these brave Americans hadn't fought, my dear Frere, you would be goose stepping to German victory marches and singing the praises of the Japanese sun god emperor. Christianity, along with Judaism only a faint memory.

Rather, you need to thank them.

geesh, Doc, and now we got

geesh, Doc, and now we got Newt saying the same malarkey about sharia law . . .

Happy Ramadan, doc, dude . . .

I do not recall which consitution of the Second Vatican Council calling for interfaith dialogue went: Nuke'em all; let God sort them out!

please tell me

WHAT are you talking

WHAT are you talking about???
You're not making any sense.
What does Newt, Sharia law, Ramadan and interfaith dialogue have to do with thanking soldiers for fighting in a war against Nazism and Japanese Imperialism have to do with that?

doc, if you cannot see that

doc, if you cannot see that dropping nuclear bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki and firebombing Tokyo was intrinsically and profoundly morally wrong then you cannot connect these dots either.

sorry
pray for peace
and for our conversion to Catholicism.

But what you fail to see is

But what you fail to see is that those bombings brought the war to an end and saved millions.

On this point, it depends

On this point, it depends pretty much on who you believe. But if what you say is true then you are saying that one can do an evil act to prevent evil. My understanding is that is not the position of The Church.

As far as the position of the

As far as the position of the church, well, it blows and changes with the direction of the wind. You could be burned at the stake for teaching that the earth revolves around the sun. You can fill a library with errors the church has put forward.

So it would be wrong to bomb and kill the guards at Auschwitz? Could you live with your CONSCIENCE if innocents died because YOU refused to attack and kill their oppressors?

Ratzinger (Pope B16) in his capacity as theological adviser to the Second Vatican Council:

“Over the Pope as expression of the binding claim of ecclesiastical authority, there stands one’s own conscience which must be obeyed before all else, even if necessary against the requirement of ecclesiastical authority. This emphasis on the individual, whose conscience confronts him with a supreme and ultimate tribunal, and one which in the last resort is beyond the claim of external social groups, even the official Church, also establishes a principle in opposition to increasing totalitarianism”.
(Joseph Ratzinger in: Commentary on the Documents of Vatican II ,Vol. V., pg. 134 (Ed) H. Vorgrimler, New York, Herder and Herder, 1967).

why not read "Ratzinger" now

why not read "Ratzinger" now as Pope condemning forever nuclear weapons, like his immediate predecessor before him as well . . .

no blowing in the wind there but consistent dogmatic pronouncements.

but then perhaps you are not a doctor of divinity, nor even, as you first paragraph evidences, a practicing Catholic?

I fail to share your

I fail to share your delusion. I fail to see what is not there.

Read Atomic Tragedy: Henry L. Stimson and the Decision to Use the Bomb Against Japan by Sean L. Malloy

and begin to see.

busy day, Tex. And what did

busy day, Tex.

And what did we do to the indigenous people of Bikini Island? How did our boys treat the people of Vietnam? What do we now with our superior firepower call the people of Iraq, who never invaded us in any way - rag monkeys?

I do not hide American atrocities. Of course, there are criminals in every organization. This includes the U.S. military, teachers and the clergy. And yes, the Iraq war is a monument to stupidity.

As to how our boys treated the people of Vietnam... I would say pretty good on average(judging from the number of boat people who fled the communist "liberators" and the number of Vietnamese currently waiting years to immigrate to the uhmmm.. "oppressive" United States)

Did any of you nay-sayers

Did any of you nay-sayers catch the powerful witness of my Bishop Ricardo Ramirez in his statement published in Michael Sean Winter's Distinctly Catholic column here August 4, in which after praising immigrants and the Second Vatican Council at length, with its collegiality and involvement of laity, this great statement comes, powerfully and prophetically: "the Church continues to have a strong prophetic voice. Here in New Mexico, for example, we worked hard and succeeded together at getting the death penalty eliminated in the state. We will continue to promote life and other issues such as nuclear deterrence, immigration reform and health care."

"Every act of war directed to

"Every act of war directed to the indiscriminate destruction of whole cities or vast areas with their inhabitants is a crime against God and man, which merits firm and unequivocal condemnation."110 A danger of modern warfare is that it provides the opportunity to those who possess modern scientific weapons—especially atomic, biological, or chemical weapons—to commit such crimes.

Left wing peacenik propaganda? No, Catechism of the Catholic Church.

I was watching a documentary

I was watching a documentary about the Bataan Death March yesterday.
As the description of the horrible things the Japanase did to men who
surrendered (of course the men who surrendered were weak for not dying on the battle field) should be treated like small lab mice and butchered and abused at the Japanese soldiers whim.

I took satisfaction in knowing what happened only a few short years later via the Enola Gay and Jimmy Doolittle.

Justice would be a good word!!

Mother does not sound quite

Mother does not sound quite blessed, not nearly enough
oremus

Dear Fr. John Dear SJ: "We

Dear Fr. John Dear SJ:
"We repent of the atomic bomb, of those horrific acts, of all the death and destruction that we have wrought."
I respect fully that you are an arduous pacifist in promoting peace.
I don't know if you were born when the two hombs were dropped on Japan.
Why were they dropped on Japan? Who has stated the war unilaterally anyway?
How were the conditions of the people oppressed under that war imposed on them decades before the two bombs finnaly stopped it? They are all true histories indivisibly connected.
Besides lamenting the effects of the two preventing further war crimes bombs, instructions on the true histories of the war from the beginning to the end also be necesarily propagated. It is pitiful to being one sideded and deliberately omitting the other major side of the cause of the why dropping those two bombs.
Pcifist without compassion to the ten millinons and hundred millions of Chinese and Asians and South Asian people who died, suferred and endured years of physical and emotional pains, to my personal opinon, is a simplicist.

The Bataan Death March made

The Bataan Death March made the atomic bomb justice?

Killing tens of thousands of children in Hiroshima and Nagasaki is justice? Just like those who say abortion is okay in the case of rape.

Deaer Anonymous: I really

Deaer Anonymous:
I really don't understand your logic of "the Bataan Death March ........."
Would you tell me your feeling of the millions and millions who suffered and died under tha Janeses cruelties, brutaliesand, atrocities in Asia that finally stoped by the two bomb on Japan?
We regret the histories but not ignore one part and focus the other part of one's own choice.

Post new comment

NCR Comment code:

  1. Be respectful. Do not attack the writer. Take on the idea, not the messenger.
  2. Use appropriate language. Avoid vulgarities and slurs.
  3. Keep to the point. Deliberate digressions don't aid the discussion.

For more detailed guidelines, visit our User Guidelines page.

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
(if you have one; if not, leave this blank)
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <font> <swf> <swf list>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You may use <swf file="song.mp3"> to display Flash files inline

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This is to prove you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.